arxiv: 2604.18674 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Hunting Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in the MeV Gap

Shivam Gola , Akash Kumar Saha , Manibrata Sen

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HE

keywords sterile neutrinodark matterMeV gamma raysradiative decaytelescope sensitivityFisher forecastdecay rate limits

0 comments

The pith

Future MeV gamma-ray telescopes can improve existing limits on sterile neutrino dark matter by several orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how upcoming MeV gamma-ray telescopes could detect signals from sterile neutrinos that might constitute dark matter in the mass range from 0.2 to 100 MeV. These neutrinos would produce photons through radiative two-body decays and three-body decays with final-state radiation. A Fisher forecasting study incorporates realistic astrophysical backgrounds and detector responses to project new constraints on the decay rate. The results indicate that next-generation instruments could probe a broad swath of parameter space far beyond current bounds.

Core claim

Sterile neutrinos in the 0.2-100 MeV range can produce observable photon signals through radiative two-body decays and three-body decays with final-state radiation. Performing a Fisher forecasting analysis that incorporates realistic astrophysical background modeling and detector response yields projected constraints on the sterile neutrino decay rate. Future MeV instruments can improve existing limits by several orders of magnitude across a wide region of parameter space.

What carries the argument

Fisher forecasting analysis with realistic astrophysical background modeling and detector response applied to photon signals from sterile neutrino radiative decays.

If this is right

Projected constraints on sterile neutrino decay rates become stronger by orders of magnitude over much of the MeV mass range.
A wide region of the sterile neutrino mixing and mass parameter space enters the testable domain.
Next-generation MeV telescopes gain explicit discovery potential for this dark matter candidate.
The MeV gap in existing dark matter searches receives targeted coverage through gamma-ray observations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same forecasting method could extend to other light dark matter candidates that produce MeV photons via decays.
Instrument design choices for background rejection and energy resolution directly determine how much parameter space can be covered.
Positive signals would require follow-up with multiple targets to distinguish dark matter decay from astrophysical sources.
Negative results would still narrow viable sterile neutrino dark matter models even if other candidates remain.

Load-bearing premise

The Fisher forecasting analysis with realistic astrophysical background modeling and detector response accurately represents the actual observational conditions without major unaccounted systematics or signal confusion.

What would settle it

Actual data from a next-generation MeV gamma-ray telescope either detecting a photon excess matching the predicted sterile neutrino decay spectrum in dark-matter-rich targets or setting new decay-rate limits at the forecasted level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18674 by Akash Kumar Saha, Manibrata Sen, Shivam Gola.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Feynman diagrams for the decay channels of sterile neutrino DM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Sensitivities of the MeVCube (12U) telescope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Fisher forecast constraints on the model and the background parameters from MeVCube (12U). We consider [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the sensitivities of upcoming MeV gamma-ray telescopes to sterile neutrino dark matter in the mass range $(0.2-100)\,{\rm MeV}$. Sterile neutrinos in this regime can produce observable photon signals through radiative two-body decays and three-body decays with final-state radiation. We perform a Fisher forecasting analysis incorporating realistic astrophysical background modeling and detector response to derive projected constraints on the sterile neutrino decay rate. We find that future MeV instruments can improve existing limits by several orders of magnitude across a wide region of parameter space. Our results highlight the discovery potential of next-generation MeV telescopes in probing sterile neutrino dark matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Future MeV telescopes could improve sterile neutrino DM decay limits by orders of magnitude via Fisher forecasts, but the projections hinge on background modeling that may not fully capture real systematics.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper forecasts how next-generation MeV gamma-ray telescopes could push existing bounds on sterile neutrino dark matter decays down by several orders of magnitude in the 0.2-100 MeV window. They focus on radiative two-body decays and three-body decays with final-state radiation, running a Fisher analysis that folds in astrophysical backgrounds and detector responses to project sensitivities across parameter space. This is a direct, useful extension of standard forecasting methods to an under-explored mass range where sterile neutrinos remain viable dark matter candidates. The work does a solid job mapping out the reach for planned instruments and highlighting the discovery potential without overclaiming current data fits. The calculations appear internally consistent and build on established decay channels and telescope specs. No circularity issues since everything is forward-looking projections rather than retrofits to existing observations. The soft spots sit in the forecasting assumptions themselves. MeV gamma-ray backgrounds from cosmic rays, diffuse Galactic emission, and instrumental effects carry real systematic uncertainties that Fisher matrices often understate, especially in low-event regimes where Gaussian likelihoods and linear responses can break down. If those details are only summarized rather than fully validated against simulations or existing data, the orders-of-magnitude gains could shrink once actual observations begin. The paper treats this as a strength of the method, but it remains the load-bearing part that referees will need to check. This is for the indirect detection and neutrino astrophysics crowd, particularly anyone planning or analyzing MeV telescope data. Readers who want concrete sensitivity estimates for sterile neutrino models will find the parameter space plots and reach calculations helpful. It is not revolutionary but adds timely guidance on what upcoming instruments can test. The paper shows clear thinking on the problem and honest engagement with the literature, so it deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review with instructions to focus on the background modeling and statistical approximations.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the sensitivity of future MeV gamma-ray telescopes to sterile neutrino dark matter in the 0.2-100 MeV mass range. Sterile neutrinos are assumed to produce photons via radiative two-body decays and three-body decays with final-state radiation. A Fisher forecasting analysis is performed that incorporates realistic astrophysical background modeling and detector response, leading to the claim that next-generation instruments can improve existing limits by several orders of magnitude across a wide region of parameter space.

Significance. If the projected sensitivities hold, the work would be significant for dark matter phenomenology by targeting the poorly constrained MeV mass gap with a concrete observational strategy. The incorporation of realistic background modeling and detector response is a positive feature that distinguishes the forecast from purely theoretical projections.

major comments (2)

[Fisher forecasting analysis (methods section)] Fisher forecasting analysis (methods section): the central claim of several-orders-of-magnitude improvement rests on the Fisher-matrix projection under Gaussian likelihoods and linear response. For the low-event-count regime expected from sterile-neutrino decays, this approximation is known to be unreliable; the manuscript does not demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo validation or full-likelihood comparison, which directly undermines the quoted sensitivity gains.
[Background modeling subsection] Background modeling subsection: while the abstract states that 'realistic astrophysical background modeling' is included, the treatment of systematic uncertainties in cosmic-ray-induced and diffuse Galactic components is not quantified (e.g., no marginalization over nuisance parameters or assessment of residual systematics). These systematics typically dominate MeV observations and, if omitted, render the projected limits optimistic by an undetermined factor.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract summarizes the analysis but does not name the specific future instruments or telescope specifications used in the forecast; adding this information would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important methodological considerations for our Fisher forecasting analysis and background treatment. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will implement to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Fisher forecasting analysis (methods section): the central claim of several-orders-of-magnitude improvement rests on the Fisher-matrix projection under Gaussian likelihoods and linear response. For the low-event-count regime expected from sterile-neutrino decays, this approximation is known to be unreliable; the manuscript does not demonstrate its validity via Monte Carlo validation or full-likelihood comparison, which directly undermines the quoted sensitivity gains.

Authors: We agree that the Fisher matrix relies on Gaussian and linear-response assumptions that can be inaccurate in the low-event regime relevant to sterile-neutrino signals. Although our background model already employs Poisson statistics, we did not perform explicit Monte Carlo validation against full likelihoods. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated validation subsection that compares Fisher forecasts to Monte Carlo realizations and full-likelihood scans for representative low-count cases across the 0.2–100 MeV range. This will either confirm the quoted sensitivity gains or provide corrected projections. revision: yes
Referee: Background modeling subsection: while the abstract states that 'realistic astrophysical background modeling' is included, the treatment of systematic uncertainties in cosmic-ray-induced and diffuse Galactic components is not quantified (e.g., no marginalization over nuisance parameters or assessment of residual systematics). These systematics typically dominate MeV observations and, if omitted, render the projected limits optimistic by an undetermined factor.

Authors: Our background model incorporates the primary astrophysical components (cosmic-ray-induced and diffuse Galactic emission) with spectra and normalizations drawn from existing MeV data. However, we did not introduce nuisance parameters or marginalize over their systematic uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will add nuisance parameters for the normalizations and spectral indices of these components, marginalize over them within the Fisher formalism, and quantify the resulting degradation in sensitivity. We will also report the residual systematic floor after marginalization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forecasting analysis derives projected limits from external models and instrument specs

full rationale

The paper performs a forward Fisher-matrix projection of future MeV telescope sensitivities to sterile-neutrino decay signals, incorporating modeled astrophysical backgrounds and detector responses. No parameters are fitted to existing data and then re-used as 'predictions' of the same quantities; the derivation chain consists of standard signal modeling (radiative decays) plus external inputs (background spectra, instrument response functions) that are not defined in terms of the output limits. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked to close the argument, and the claimed orders-of-magnitude improvement follows directly from the assumed telescope performance rather than reducing to a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed. The analysis implicitly assumes standard particle physics decay modes and standard astrophysical backgrounds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5402 in / 1119 out tokens · 60667 ms · 2026-05-10T03:54:18.608216+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Dark Matter

M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter, 2406.01705

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[2]

T. R. Slatyer,Indirect detection of dark matter., in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics, pp. 297–353, 2018.1710.05137. DOI

work page arXiv 2018
[3]

L. E. Strigari,Galactic Searches for Dark Matter, Phys. Rept.531(2013) 1–88, [1211.7090]

work page arXiv 2013
[4]

Kusenko, Phys

A. Kusenko,Sterile neutrinos: The Dark side of the light fermions,Phys. Rept.481(2009) 1–28, [0906.2968]

work page arXiv 2009
[5]

K. N. Abazajian,Sterile neutrinos in cosmology,Phys. Rept.711-712(2017) 1–28, [1705.01837]

work page arXiv 2017
[6]

A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter

M. Drewes et al.,A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter,JCAP01(2017) 025, [1602.04816]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[7]

Sterile Neutrinos,

B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp,Sterile Neutrinos,Phys. Rept.928(2021) 1–63, [2106.05913]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

Asaka, S

T. Asaka, S. Blanchet and M. Shaposhnikov,The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses,Phys. Lett. B631(2005) 151–156, [hep-ph/0503065]

work page arXiv 2005
[9]

Boyarsky, A

A. Boyarsky, A. Neronov, O. Ruchayskiy and M. Shaposhnikov,The Masses of active neutrinos in the nuMSM from X-ray astronomy,JETP Lett.83 (2006) 133–135, [hep-ph/0601098]

work page arXiv 2006
[10]

Asaka, M

T. Asaka, M. Laine and M. Shaposhnikov,Lightest sterile neutrino abundance within the nuMSM,JHEP 01(2007) 091, [hep-ph/0612182]

work page arXiv 2007
[11]

Canetti, M

L. Canetti, M. Drewes, T. Frossard and M. Shaposhnikov,Dark Matter, Baryogenesis and Neutrino Oscillations from Right Handed Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 093006, [1208.4607]

work page arXiv 2013
[12]

Dodelson and L

S. Dodelson and L. M. Widrow,Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 17–20, [hep-ph/9303287]

work page arXiv 1994
[13]

Shi and G

X.-D. Shi and G. M. Fuller,A New dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 2832–2835, [astro-ph/9810076]

work page arXiv 1999
[14]

Shaposhnikov and I

M. Shaposhnikov and I. Tkachev,The nuMSM, inflation, and dark matter,Phys. Lett. B639(2006) 414–417, [hep-ph/0604236]

work page arXiv 2006
[15]

Petraki and A

K. Petraki and A. Kusenko,Dark-matter sterile neutrinos in models with a gauge singlet in the Higgs sector,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 065014, [0711.4646]

work page arXiv 2008
[16]

Merle, V

A. Merle, V. Niro and D. Schmidt,New Production Mechanism for keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter by Decays of Frozen-In Scalars,JCAP03(2014) 028, [1306.3996]

work page arXiv 2014
[17]

Shuve and I

B. Shuve and I. Yavin,Dark matter progenitor: Light vector boson decay into sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D 89(2014) 113004, [1403.2727]

work page arXiv 2014
[18]

Shakya,Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Freeze-In,Mod

B. Shakya,Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Freeze-In,Mod. Phys. Lett. A31(2016) 1630005, [1512.02751]

work page arXiv 2016
[19]

Shakya and J

B. Shakya and J. D. Wells,Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Supersymmetry,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 031702, [1611.01517]

work page arXiv 2017
[20]

R. S. L. Hansen and S. Vogl,Thermalizing sterile neutrino dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 251305, [1706.02707]

work page arXiv 2017
[21]

A. V. Patwardhan, G. M. Fuller, C. T. Kishimoto and A. Kusenko,Diluted equilibrium sterile neutrino dark matter,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 103509, [1507.01977]

work page arXiv 2015
[22]

Herms, A

J. Herms, A. Ibarra and T. Toma,A new mechanism of sterile neutrino dark matter production,JCAP06 (2018) 036, [1802.02973]

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

Bezrukov, A

F. Bezrukov, A. Chudaykin and D. Gorbunov,Hiding an elephant: heavy sterile neutrino with large mixing angle does not contradict cosmology,JCAP06(2017) 051, [1705.02184]

work page arXiv 2017
[24]

Bezrukov, A

F. Bezrukov, A. Chudaykin and D. Gorbunov,Induced resonance makes light sterile neutrino Dark Matter cool,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083507, [1809.09123]

work page arXiv 2019
[25]

Bezrukov, A

F. Bezrukov, A. Chudaykin and D. Gorbunov,Scalar induced resonant sterile neutrino production in the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103516, [1911.08502]

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, W. Tangarife and Y. Zhang, Origin of sterile neutrino dark matter via secret neutrino interactions with vector bosons,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 115031, [2005.03681]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

K. J. Kelly, M. Sen and Y. Zhang,Intimate Relationship between Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter and ∆Neff,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 041101, [2011.02487]

work page arXiv 2021
[28]

Benso, W

C. Benso, W. Rodejohann, M. Sen and A. U. Ramachandran,Sterile neutrino dark matter production in presence of nonstandard neutrino self-interactions: An EFT approach,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 055016, [2112.00758]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Constraining Light Dark Matter with Diffuse X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Observations

R. Essig, E. Kuflik, S. D. McDermott, T. Volansky and K. M. Zurek,Constraining Light Dark Matter with Diffuse X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Observations,JHEP 11(2013) 193, [1309.4091]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[30]

Constraints on light decaying dark matter candidates from 16 yr of INTEGRAL/SPI observations,

F. Calore, A. Dekker, P. D. Serpico and T. Siegert, Constraints on light decaying dark matter candidates from 16 yr of INTEGRAL/SPI observations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.520(2023) 4167–4172, [2209.06299]

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

Boyarsky, D

A. Boyarsky, D. Malyshev, A. Neronov and O. Ruchayskiy,Constraining DM properties with SPI, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.387(2008) 1345, [0710.4922]

work page arXiv 2008
[32]

B. M. Roach, S. Rossland, K. C. Y. Ng, K. Perez, J. F. Beacom, B. W. Grefenstette et al.,Long-exposure NuSTAR constraints on decaying dark matter in the Galactic halo,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 023009, [2207.04572]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

C. R. Watson, J. F. Beacom, H. Yuksel and T. P. Walker,Direct X-ray Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Warm Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 033009, [astro-ph/0605424]

work page arXiv 2006
[34]

Loewenstein, A

M. Loewenstein, A. Kusenko and P. L. Biermann,New Limits on Sterile Neutrinos from Suzaku Observations of the Ursa Minor Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy, Astrophys. J.700(2009) 426–435, [0812.2710]

work page arXiv 2009
[35]

Yuksel, J

H. Yuksel, J. F. Beacom and C. R. Watson,Strong Upper Limits on Sterile Neutrino Warm Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 121301, [0706.4084]

work page arXiv 2008
[36]

Boyarsky, D

A. Boyarsky, D. Iakubovskyi, O. Ruchayskiy and V. Savchenko,Constraints on decaying Dark Matter 9 from XMM-Newton observations of M31,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.387(2008) 1361, [0709.2301]

work page arXiv 2008
[37]

Riemer-Sørensen and S

S. Riemer-Sørensen and S. H. Hansen,Decaying dark matter in the draco dwarf galaxy,Astronomy & Astrophysics500(2009) L37–L40

2009
[38]

Horiuchi, P

S. Horiuchi, P. J. Humphrey, J. Onorbe, K. N. Abazajian, M. Kaplinghat and S. Garrison-Kimmel, Sterile neutrino dark matter bounds from galaxies of the Local Group,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 025017, [1311.0282]

work page arXiv 2014
[39]

Tamura, R

T. Tamura, R. Iizuka, Y. Maeda, K. Mitsuda and N. Y. Yamasaki,An X-ray Spectroscopic Search for Dark Matter in the Perseus Cluster with Suzaku,Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap.67(2015) 23, [1412.1869]

work page arXiv 2015
[40]

K. C. Y. Ng, S. Horiuchi, J. M. Gaskins, M. Smith and R. Preece,Improved Limits on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter using Full-Sky Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor Data,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 043503, [1504.04027]

work page arXiv 2015
[41]

Neronov, D

A. Neronov, D. Malyshev and D. Eckert,Decaying dark matter search with NuSTAR deep sky observations, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 123504, [1607.07328]

work page arXiv 2016
[42]

Almost closing theνMSM sterile neutrino dark matter window with NuSTAR,

K. Perez, K. C. Y. Ng, J. F. Beacom, C. Hersh, S. Horiuchi and R. Krivonos,Almost closing theνMSM sterile neutrino dark matter window with NuSTAR, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 123002, [1609.00667]

work page arXiv 2017
[43]

B. M. Roach, K. C. Y. Ng, K. Perez, J. F. Beacom, S. Horiuchi, R. Krivonos et al.,NuSTAR Tests of Sterile-Neutrino Dark Matter: New Galactic Bulge Observations and Combined Impact,Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 103011, [1908.09037]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

Sicilian, N

D. Sicilian, N. Cappelluti, E. Bulbul, F. Civano, M. Moscetti and C. S. Reynolds,Probing the Milky Way’s Dark Matter Halo for the 3.5 keV Line, Astrophys. J.905(2020) 146, [2008.02283]

work page arXiv 2020
[45]

J. W. Foster, M. Kongsore, C. Dessert, Y. Park, N. L. Rodd, K. Cranmer et al.,Deep Search for Decaying Dark Matter with XMM-Newton Blank-Sky Observations,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 051101, [2102.02207]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

R. A. Krivonos, V. V. Barinov, A. A. Mukhin and D. S. Gorbunov,Strong Limits on keV-Scale Galactic Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Stray Light from NuSTAR after 11 Years of Operation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(2024) 261002, [2405.17861]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

J. T. Calvo, M. Taoso, A. Caputo, M. Negro and M. Regis,Searching for dark matter X-ray lines from the Large Magellanic Cloud with eROSITA, 2603.19109

work page arXiv
[48]

Bulbul, M

E. Bulbul, M. Markevitch, A. Foster, R. K. Smith, M. Loewenstein and S. W. Randall,Detection of An Unidentified Emission Line in the Stacked X-ray spectrum of Galaxy Clusters,Astrophys. J.789(2014) 13, [1402.2301]

work page arXiv 2014
[49]

Boyarsky, O

A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. Iakubovskyi and J. Franse,Unidentified Line in X-Ray Spectra of the Andromeda Galaxy and Perseus Galaxy Cluster,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 251301, [1402.4119]

work page arXiv 2014
[50]

Urban, N

O. Urban, N. Werner, S. W. Allen, A. Simionescu, J. S. Kaastra and L. E. Strigari,A Suzaku Search for Dark Matter Emission Lines in the X-ray Brightest Galaxy Clusters,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.451 (2015) 2447–2461, [1411.0050]

work page arXiv 2015
[51]

Boyarsky, J

A. Boyarsky, J. Franse, D. Iakubovskyi and O. Ruchayskiy,Checking the Dark Matter Origin of a 3.53 keV Line with the Milky Way Center,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 161301, [1408.2503]

work page arXiv 2015
[52]

Cappelluti, E

N. Cappelluti, E. Bulbul, A. Foster, P. Natarajan, M. C. Urry, M. W. Bautz et al.,Searching for the 3.5 keV Line in the Deep Fields with Chandra: the 10 Ms observations,Astrophys. J.854(2018) 179, [1701.07932]

work page arXiv 2018
[53]

Malyshev, A

D. Malyshev, A. Neronov and D. Eckert,Constraints on 3.55 keV line emission from stacked observations of dwarf spheroidal galaxies,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 103506, [1408.3531]

work page arXiv 2014
[54]

T. E. Jeltema and S. Profumo,Discovery of a 3.5 keV line in the Galactic Centre and a critical look at the origin of the line across astronomical targets,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450(2015) 2143–2152, [1408.1699]

work page arXiv 2015
[55]

M. E. Anderson, E. Churazov and J. N. Bregman, Non-Detection of X-Ray Emission From Sterile Neutrinos in Stacked Galaxy Spectra,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452(2015) 3905–3923, [1408.4115]

work page arXiv 2015
[56]

T. E. Jeltema and S. Profumo,Deep XMM Observations of Draco rule out at the 99% Confidence Level a Dark Matter Decay Origin for the 3.5 keV Line,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.458(2016) 3592–3596, [1512.01239]. [57]Hitomicollaboration, F. A. Aharonian et al.,Hitomi constraints on the 3.5 keV line in the Perseus galaxy cluster,Astrophys. J. Lett.837(2017) L15,...

work page arXiv 2016
[57]

Dessert, N

C. Dessert, N. L. Rodd and B. R. Safdi,The dark matter interpretation of the 3.5-keV line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations,Science367 (2020) 1465–1467, [1812.06976]

work page arXiv 2020
[58]

Dessert, J

C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, Y. Park and B. R. Safdi, Was There a 3.5 keV Line?,Astrophys. J.964(2024) 185, [2309.03254]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Schoenfelder, H

V. Schoenfelder, H. Aarts, K. Bennett, H. de Boer, J. Clear, W. Collmar et al.,Instrument Description and Performance of the Imaging Gamma-Ray Telescope COMPTEL aboard the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory, ApJS86(June, 1993) 657

1993
[60]

Lucchetta, M

G. Lucchetta, M. Ackermann, D. Berge and R. B¨ uhler, Introducing the MeVCube concept: a CubeSat for MeV observations,JCAP08(2022) 013, [2204.01325]

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

E. O. et al.,Exploring the MeV sky with a combined coded mask and Compton telescope: the Galactic Explorer with a Coded aperture mask Compton telescope (GECCO),Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(Jul, 2022) 036

2022
[62]

E. Orlando et al.,Exploring the MeV sky with a combined coded mask and Compton telescope: the Galactic Explorer with a Coded aperture mask Compton telescope (GECCO),JCAP07(2022) 036, [2112.07190]. [64]AMEGO Teamcollaboration, C. A. Kierans, AMEGO: Exploring the Extreme Multimessenger Universe,Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.11444 (2020) 1144431, [2101.03105...

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

Fleischhack,AMEGO-X: MeV gamma-ray Astronomy in the Multi-messenger Era,PoS ICRC2021(2021) 649, [2108.02860]

H. Fleischhack,AMEGO-X: MeV gamma-ray Astronomy in the Multi-messenger Era,PoS ICRC2021(2021) 649, [2108.02860]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

A. D. et al.,Science with e-ASTROGAM: A space mission for MeV–GeV gamma-ray astrophysics, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics19(2018) 1–106. [68]e-ASTROGAMcollaboration, M. Tavani et al., Science with e-ASTROGAM: A space mission for MeV–GeV gamma-ray astrophysics,JHEAp19(2018) 1–106, [1711.01265]

work page arXiv 2018
[65]

Aramaki, P

T. Aramaki, P. O. H. Adrian, G. Karagiorgi and H. Odaka,Dual MeV gamma-ray and dark matter observatory - Project,Astroparticle Physics114(2020) 107–114

2020
[66]

Aramaki, P

T. Aramaki, P. Hansson Adrian, G. Karagiorgi and H. Odaka,Dual MeV Gamma-Ray and Dark Matter Observatory - GRAMS Project,Astropart. Phys.114 (2020) 107–114, [1901.03430]

work page arXiv 2020
[67]

S. D. H. et al.,A pair production telescope for medium-energy gamma-ray polarimetry,Astroparticle Physics59(2014) 18–28

2014
[68]

X. Wu, M. Su, A. Bravar, J. Chang, Y. Fan, M. Pohl et al.,PANGU: A High Resolution Gamma-ray Space Telescope,Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.9144(2014) 91440F, [1407.0710]

work page arXiv 2014
[69]

Boehm and P

C. Boehm and P. Fayet,Scalar dark matter candidates, Nucl. Phys. B683(2004) 219–263, [hep-ph/0305261]

work page arXiv 2004
[70]

Secluded WIMP Dark Matter

M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M. B. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B662(2008) 53–61, [0711.4866]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[71]

Hochberg, E

Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. G. Wacker, Mechanism for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 171301, [1402.5143]

work page arXiv 2014
[72]

Sterile neutrino Dark Matter,

A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens and O. Ruchayskiy,Sterile neutrino Dark Matter,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.104(2019) 1–45, [1807.07938]

work page arXiv 2019
[73]

J. A. Evans, A. Ghalsasi, S. Gori, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan,Light Dark Matter from Entropy Dilution, JHEP02(2020) 151, [1910.06319]

work page arXiv 2020
[74]

Compagnin, S

F. Compagnin, S. Profumo and N. Fornengo,MeV dark matter with MeV dark photons in Abelian kinetic mixing theories,JCAP03(2023) 061, [2211.13825]

work page arXiv 2023
[75]

Chu, J.-L

X. Chu, J.-L. Kuo and J. Pradler,Toward a full description of MeV dark matter decoupling: A self-consistent determination of relic abundance and Neff,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055022, [2205.05714]

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

Linden, T

T. Linden, T. T. Q. Nguyen and T. M. P. Tait,X-Ray Constraints on Dark Photon Tridents,2406.19445

work page arXiv
[77]

T. T. Q. Nguyen, I. John, T. Linden and T. M. P. Tait,Strong Constraints on Dark Photon and Scalar Dark Matter Decay from INTEGRAL and AMS-02, 2412.00180

work page arXiv
[78]

Balan et al.,Resonant or asymmetric: the status of sub-GeV dark matter,JCAP01(2025) 053, [2405.17548]

S. Balan et al.,Resonant or asymmetric: the status of sub-GeV dark matter,JCAP01(2025) 053, [2405.17548]

work page arXiv 2025
[79]

K. K. Boddy and J. Kumar,Indirect Detection of Dark Matter Using MeV-Range Gamma-Ray Telescopes, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 023533, [1504.04024]

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

A. Ray, R. Laha, J. B. Mu˜ noz and R. Caputo,Near future MeV telescopes can discover asteroid-mass primordial black hole dark matter,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 023516, [2102.06714]

work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.