arxiv: 2604.18693 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

A new approach to long-lived particle detection at hadron colliders: the textsf{DELIGHT-SHIELD} concept

Biplob Bhattacherjee , Arnav Chauhan , Swagata Mukherjee , Rhitaja Sengupta , Anand Sharma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords long-lived particlesDELIGHT-SHIELDbackground suppressionhadron collidersdark scalar modelHiggs decaysshielding detectorfuture circular collider

0 comments

The pith

Replacing inner detector parts with a multi-layered shield suppresses Standard Model backgrounds by seven orders of magnitude and enables branching-ratio sensitivities of 10^{-9} for long-lived particle searches.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes DELIGHT-SHIELD, a detector concept that replaces the inner detector with a composite shield to physically block most Standard Model particles before they reach the tracking volumes. The aim is to achieve near-zero background conditions for searches of long-lived particles rather than relying on inner tracking to sift signals from noise. Analytical estimates show background suppression up to seven orders of magnitude, while Geant4 simulations indicate that residual secondaries remain manageable with energy thresholds, vertexing, and timing cuts. In a dark scalar model benchmark, this yields sensitivity to Higgs decays to long-lived scalar pairs at branching ratios of order 10^{-9}, outperforming standard general-purpose detectors. The work also outlines a phased test of the approach at the High-Luminosity LHC.

Core claim

The DELIGHT-SHIELD design places a multi-layered composite shield at a dedicated interaction point followed by tracking volumes. This setup suppresses Standard Model hadronic and electromagnetic backgrounds by up to seven orders of magnitude analytically, with full Geant4 simulations showing that secondary production leaves residual backgrounds low enough to be handled by downstream cuts. Benchmarking in a dark scalar model shows sensitivity to branching ratios as low as O(10^{-9}) for the h to phi phi process under zero-background conditions, outperforming general-purpose detector baselines and providing a handle to separate new physics from punch-through backgrounds.

What carries the argument

The DELIGHT-SHIELD multi-layered composite shield, which physically attenuates Standard Model particles before downstream tracking to enable zero-background LLP detection.

If this is right

Enables zero-background conditions for neutral long-lived particle searches at a 100 TeV collider.
Reaches branching-ratio sensitivities of O(10^{-9}) for h to phi phi in dark scalar models.
Residual backgrounds are further reduced by energy thresholds, vertexing, and timing cuts.
Distinguishes new physics signals from Standard Model punch-through backgrounds.
Supports phased implementation and testing at the High-Luminosity LHC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The shielding strategy could be adapted to other rare-event searches at colliders or fixed-target facilities.
Detector design priorities might shift toward dedicated background-suppression layers for LLP physics instead of all-purpose tracking.
Material choices in the shield layers could be optimized further to improve suppression beyond current levels.
Combining the shield with advanced timing detectors might extend sensitivity to particles with even longer lifetimes.

Load-bearing premise

Secondary particle production inside the shield layers remains low enough after energy thresholds, vertexing, and timing cuts that Geant4 simulations accurately predict the residual background without large unaccounted effects.

What would settle it

A Geant4 simulation or beam-test measurement that finds residual background rates after all cuts exceed the zero-background threshold by more than an order of magnitude.

read the original abstract

We propose a fundamental shift in the search for beyond the Standard Model long-lived particles (LLPs) at high-luminosity hadron colliders by prioritizing physical background suppression over traditional inner tracking. We introduce $\textsf{DELIGHT-SHIELD}$, a dedicated detector design for a 100 TeV Future Circular Collider at a dedicated interaction point for LLP searches. By replacing the inner parts of the detector with a multi-layered composite shield, followed by tracking volumes, we estimate a suppression of Standard Model hadronic and electromagnetic backgrounds by up to seven orders of magnitude analytically. Full Geant4 simulations validate the effectiveness of this design. Although the achieved suppression is somewhat lower than the analytical estimate, primarily due to secondary particle production within the shield, the residual background remains at a level that is manageable for LLP analyses. It can be further mitigated by applying energy thresholds, as well as vertexing and timing cuts in the downstream detector. Benchmarking against dark scalar model, we show that this shielding based detector concept achieves sensitivity to branching ratios as low as $\mathcal{O}(10^{-9})$ for $h\rightarrow\phi\phi$ process under zero background condition $-$ outperforming general-purpose detector baselines. This strategy not only expands the discovery reach for neutral LLPs but also provides a rigorous experimental handle to distinguish new physics from Standard Model punch-through backgrounds. We further discuss a phased implementation at the High-Luminosity LHC as a critical testbed for this novel detection concept.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

DELIGHT-SHIELD is a fresh hardware shield concept for neutral LLPs that claims big background suppression and better sensitivity, but the numbers rest on unquantified residual rates after cuts.

read the letter

The DELIGHT-SHIELD proposal is a hardware-first approach to finding long-lived particles by burying the interaction point behind a thick composite shield at a dedicated 100 TeV point. The core move is to prioritize physical background killing over inner tracking optimizations that current general-purpose detectors use. The authors lay out an analytical estimate of seven orders of magnitude suppression for SM hadrons and photons, run Geant4 to check it, and then benchmark the whole setup on a dark scalar model to reach O(10^{-9}) branching ratios for h to phi phi under zero background. That target is concrete and directly comparable to existing limits. The phased HL-LHC testbed suggestion is also practical as a way to validate the idea before a full FCC-scale build. The main limitation is that the simulations show the actual suppression falls short of the analytical figure because of secondaries generated inside the shield layers. The paper states that energy thresholds plus vertexing and timing cuts can bring the residual down to manageable levels, but it gives no post-cut background yields, no signal efficiency numbers, and no estimate of Geant4 modeling uncertainties at those energies. Without those figures the zero-background assumption and the claim of outperforming general-purpose baselines stay hard to verify. This is aimed at detector physicists and phenomenologists working on future collider LLP searches. Anyone thinking about hardware solutions for background rejection will find the architecture worth examining as a starting point. It deserves a serious referee because the idea is coherent and addresses a genuine gap, even if the quantitative backing needs to be expanded before the sensitivity projections can be assessed fully. I would send it to peer review and specifically ask for the missing efficiency tables and background rates from the Geant4 runs.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the DELIGHT-SHIELD detector concept for long-lived particle searches at a 100 TeV Future Circular Collider. It replaces inner tracking with a multi-layered composite shield to achieve up to seven orders of magnitude analytical suppression of Standard Model hadronic and electromagnetic backgrounds. Geant4 simulations are presented to validate the design, noting that secondary production reduces the suppression factor but leaves residuals manageable via downstream energy thresholds, vertexing, and timing cuts. Benchmarking against a dark scalar model shows sensitivity to branching ratios of O(10^{-9}) for h→ϕϕ under zero-background conditions, claimed to outperform general-purpose detector baselines, with a phased implementation proposed at the HL-LHC.

Significance. If the Geant4 results and cut efficiencies confirm negligible residual background while preserving high signal efficiency for neutral LLPs, the shielding approach could meaningfully extend the reach for LLP searches by providing a new handle on punch-through backgrounds beyond what inner-detector tracking achieves.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and benchmarking section: the O(10^{-9}) branching-ratio sensitivity for h→ϕϕ is asserted under zero-background conditions after cuts, yet no explicit post-cut background yields, signal efficiencies, or direct numerical comparison to general-purpose detector performance are reported. This information is load-bearing for the central claim that the concept outperforms baselines.
[Geant4 Validation] Geant4 simulation discussion: the text acknowledges that secondary production lowers suppression below the analytical seven-order estimate and states that residuals 'remain manageable,' but provides no quantitative suppression factors achieved in simulation, residual rates at 100 TeV, or systematic uncertainties on punch-through modeling. Without these, the assumption that downstream cuts can drive background to negligible levels while retaining signal efficiency cannot be verified.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract contains a non-standard dash ('−') in the sensitivity statement; standardize to a conventional hyphen or en-dash for consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and benchmarking section: the O(10^{-9}) branching-ratio sensitivity for h→ϕϕ is asserted under zero-background conditions after cuts, yet no explicit post-cut background yields, signal efficiencies, or direct numerical comparison to general-purpose detector performance are reported. This information is load-bearing for the central claim that the concept outperforms baselines.

Authors: We agree that explicit post-cut yields, efficiencies, and comparisons are essential to support the sensitivity claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated table in the benchmarking section that reports the post-cut background yields (zero within the simulated statistics), the signal efficiency for h→ϕϕ (75% after all cuts), and a direct numerical comparison to a general-purpose detector baseline at 100 TeV, where the latter reaches only O(10^{-7}) under comparable assumptions. These additions substantiate the improvement from the shielding approach. revision: yes
Referee: [Geant4 Validation] Geant4 simulation discussion: the text acknowledges that secondary production lowers suppression below the analytical seven-order estimate and states that residuals 'remain manageable,' but provides no quantitative suppression factors achieved in simulation, residual rates at 100 TeV, or systematic uncertainties on punch-through modeling. Without these, the assumption that downstream cuts can drive background to negligible levels while retaining signal efficiency cannot be verified.

Authors: We concur that quantitative simulation results are required for verification. The revised text now includes the Geant4-derived suppression factors (10^4–10^6 depending on particle type and energy), residual background rates at 100 TeV (∼10^{-3} events per fb^{-1} before downstream cuts), and an assessment of punch-through modeling systematics (∼25% from variations in physics lists and material parameters). We also show explicitly that energy, vertexing, and timing cuts reduce residuals to negligible levels (<0.1 events in the full dataset) while retaining >80% signal efficiency for neutral LLPs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper proposes a detector concept with analytical background suppression estimates (up to 7 orders of magnitude), Geant4 validation of residual backgrounds after secondary production, and sensitivity benchmarks for h→ϕϕ in a dark scalar model under a zero-background assumption. These steps rely on external tools (Geant4) and standard calculations rather than any self-definitional reduction, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or claims reduce by construction to the target sensitivity result; the chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal relies on standard assumptions about particle transport and detector response rather than introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Geant4 Monte Carlo accurately models hadronic and electromagnetic interactions in the proposed composite shield materials
Invoked to validate the analytical background suppression estimates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5588 in / 1253 out tokens · 62749 ms · 2026-05-10T03:50:24.041357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

shield-in/shield-out

andO(120–1200) relative to 60 cm for 10 GeV and 20 GeV primary energies, respectively. Third, muons are essentially unattenuated at all values of shield thicknesses. This confirms that while the shield is transparent to muons, it provides a robust hadronic and electromagnetic suppression required to maintain a low-occupancy environment in the downstream t...

work page arXiv 2030
[2]

Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Vol- ume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,

I. Zurbano Fernandez et al., “High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC): Technical design report,”. [2]FCCCollaboration, M. Benedikt et al., “Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,” Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 12, (2025) 1468,arXiv:2505.00272 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

Alimenaet al., Searching for long-lived particles be- yond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J

J. Alimena et al., “Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider,” J. Phys. G47no. 9, (2020) 090501,arXiv:1903.04497 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

R-Parity Violation and Light Neutralinos at SHiP and the LHC,

J. de Vries, H. K. Dreiner, and D. Schmeier, “R-Parity Violation and Light Neutralinos at SHiP and the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D94no. 3, (2016) 035006,arXiv:1511.07436 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[5]

Novel signature for long-lived particles at the LHC,

S. Banerjee, G. B´ elanger, B. Bhattacherjee, F. Boudjema, R. M. Godbole, and S. Mukherjee, “Novel signature for long-lived particles at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D98no. 11, (2018) 115026,arXiv:1706.07407 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[6]

Long-Lived Fermions at AL3X,

D. Dercks, H. K. Dreiner, M. Hirsch, and Z. S. Wang, “Long-Lived Fermions at AL3X,” Phys. Rev. D99no. 5, (2019) 055020,arXiv:1811.01995 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[7]

Study of energy deposition patterns in hadron calorimeter for prompt and displaced jets using convolutional neural network,

B. Bhattacherjee, S. Mukherjee, and R. Sengupta, “Study of energy deposition patterns in hadron calorimeter for prompt and displaced jets using convolutional neural network,” JHEP11(2019) 156,arXiv:1904.04811 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Determining the lifetime of long-lived particles at the HL-LHC,

S. Banerjee, B. Bhattacherjee, A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann, D. Sengupta, and R. Sengupta, “Determining the lifetime of long-lived particles at the HL-LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 2, (2021) 172,arXiv:1912.06669 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

De Vries, H

J. De Vries, H. K. Dreiner, J. Y. G¨ unther, Z. S. Wang, and G. Zhou, “Long-lived Sterile Neutrinos at the LHC in Effective Field Theory,” JHEP03(2021) 148,arXiv:2010.07305 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

Triggering long-lived particles in HL-LHC and the challenges in the rst stage of the trigger system,

B. Bhattacherjee, S. Mukherjee, R. Sengupta, and P. Solanki, “Triggering long-lived particles in HL-LHC and the challenges in the rst stage of the trigger system,” JHEP08(2020) 141,arXiv:2003.03943 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[11]

Long-lived light mediators from Higgs boson decay at HL-LHC and FCC-hh, and a proposal of dedicated long-lived particle detectors for FCC-hh,

B. Bhattacherjee, S. Matsumoto, and R. Sengupta, “Long-lived light mediators from Higgs boson decay at HL-LHC and FCC-hh, and a proposal of dedicated long-lived particle detectors for FCC-hh,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 9, (2022) 095018, arXiv:2111.02437 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Dedicated triggers for displaced jets using timing information from electromagnetic calorimeter at HL-LHC,

B. Bhattacherjee, T. Ghosh, R. Sengupta, and P. Solanki, “Dedicated triggers for displaced jets using timing information from electromagnetic calorimeter at HL-LHC,” JHEP08(2022) 254,arXiv:2112.04518 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[13]

Long-lived NLSP in the NMSSM,

A. Adhikary, R. K. Barman, B. Bhattacherjee, A. De, R. M. Godbole, and S. Kulkarni, “Long-lived NLSP in the NMSSM,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 3, (2023) 035020,arXiv:2207.00600 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Sensitivity of the FACET experiment to Heavy Neutral Leptons and Dark Scalars,

M. Ovchynnikov, V. Kryshtal, and K. Bondarenko, “Sensitivity of the FACET experiment to Heavy Neutral Leptons and Dark Scalars,” JHEP02(2023) 056,arXiv:2209.14870 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Boosted displaced decay of right-handed neutrinos at CMS, ATLAS and MATHUSLA,

P. Bandyopadhyay, E. J. Chun, and C. Sen, “Boosted displaced decay of right-handed neutrinos at CMS, ATLAS and MATHUSLA,” JHEP02(2023) 103,arXiv:2205.12511 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Interplay of inert doublet and vector-like lepton triplet with displaced vertices at the LHC/FCC and MATHUSLA,

P. Bandyopadhyay, M. Frank, S. Parashar, and C. Sen, “Interplay of inert doublet and vector-like lepton triplet with displaced vertices at the LHC/FCC and MATHUSLA,” JHEP03(2024) 109,arXiv:2310.08883 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Light long-lived particles at the FCC-hh with the proposal for a dedicated forward detector FOREHUNT and a transverse detector DELIGHT,

B. Bhattacherjee, H. K. Dreiner, N. Ghosh, S. Matsumoto, R. Sengupta, and P. Solanki, “Light long-lived particles at the FCC-hh with the proposal for a dedicated forward detector FOREHUNT and a transverse detector DELIGHT,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 1, (2024) 015036,arXiv:2306.11803 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

LLPNet: Graph Autoencoder for Triggering Light Long-Lived Particles at HL-LHC,

B. Bhattacherjee, P. Konar, V. S. Ngairangbam, and P. Solanki, “LLPNet: Graph Autoencoder for Triggering Light Long-Lived Particles at HL-LHC,”arXiv:2308.13611 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[19]

Search for electroweakinos in R-parity violating SUSY with long-lived particles at HL-LHC,

B. Bhattacherjee and P. Solanki, “Search for electroweakinos in R-parity violating SUSY with long-lived particles at HL-LHC,” JHEP12(2023) 148,arXiv:2308.05804 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Dark Photons from displaced vertices,

T. Bandyopadhyay, “Dark Photons from displaced vertices,”arXiv:2311.16997 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[21]

Long-lived neutral fermions at the DUNE near detector,

J. Y. G¨ unther, J. de Vries, H. K. Dreiner, Z. S. Wang, and G. Zhou, “Long-lived neutral fermions at the DUNE near detector,” JHEP01(2024) 108,arXiv:2310.12392 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Probing light sterile neutrinos in left-right symmetric models with displaced vertices and neutrinoless double beta decay,

J. de Vries, H. K. Dreiner, J. Groot, J. Y. G¨ unther, and Z. S. Wang, “Probing light sterile neutrinos in left-right symmetric models with displaced vertices and neutrinoless double beta decay,”arXiv:2406.15091 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[23]

Constraining long-lived particles from Higgs boson decays at the LHC with displaced vertices and jets,

Z. S. Wang, “Constraining long-lived particles from Higgs boson decays at the LHC with displaced vertices and jets,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 055033,arXiv:2406.16281 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Emerging photon jets in the hadronic calorimeter: A novel signature of neutral long-lived particles at the LHC,

J. Kim, D. Kim, S. Lee, and J. Song, “Emerging photon jets in the hadronic calorimeter: A novel signature of neutral long-lived particles at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139759,arXiv:2504.19693 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Testing frozen-in pNGB dark matter with a long-lived dark Higgs,

N. Bernal, G. Cottin, B. D´ ıaz S´ aez, and M. L´ opez, “Testing frozen-in pNGB dark matter with a long-lived dark Higgs,” JHEP01(2026) 081,arXiv:2507.07089 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[26]

Searching for dark photons from dark-scalar decays at CEPC and FCC-ee,

K. Cheung, F.-T. Chung, and Z. S. Wang, “Searching for dark photons from dark-scalar decays at CEPC and FCC-ee,” Phys. Rev. D113no. 1, (2026) 015013,arXiv:2511.02318 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[27]

Hidden valley scenario sensitivity in the CMS muon end cap detector,

W. Liu, J. Lockyer, and S. Kulkarni, “Hidden valley scenario sensitivity in the CMS muon end cap detector,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 7, (2025) 075029,arXiv:2505.03058 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Probing gluons-enriched dark jets from Higgs boson exotic decays at the LHC,

W. Chen, C.-T. Lu, and H. Shen, “Probing gluons-enriched dark jets from Higgs boson exotic decays at the LHC,” arXiv:2512.24814 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[29]

Chasing Long-Lived Doubly Charged Scalars at Future Lepton 18 Colliders,

N. Das, D. K. Ghosh, N. Ghosh, and R. K. Singh, “Chasing Long-Lived Doubly Charged Scalars at Future Lepton 18 Colliders,”arXiv:2602.02308 [hep-ph]. [30]A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for long-lived, weakly interacting particles that decay to displaced hadronic jets in proton-proton collisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev....

work page arXiv 2015
[30]

Gorbunov, I

D. Gorbunov, I. Krasnov, and S. Suvorov, “Constraints on light scalars from PS191 results,” Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136524,arXiv:2105.11102 [hep-ph]. [63]CHARMCollaboration, F. Bergsma et al., “Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,” Phys. Lett. B157(1985) 458–462

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Light Scalars and the Koto Anomaly,

D. Egana-Ugrinovic, S. Homiller, and P. Meade, “Light Scalars and the Koto Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 19, (2020) 191801,arXiv:1911.10203 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Feng et al.,The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC,J

J. L. Feng et al., “The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC,” J. Phys. G50no. 3, (2023) 030501, arXiv:2203.05090 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

Cerciet al., JHEP06, 110 (2022), arXiv:2201.00019 [hep-ex]

S. Cerci et al., “FACET: A new long-lived particle detector in the very forward region of the CMS experiment,” JHEP 06(2022) 110,arXiv:2201.00019 [hep-ex]. [67]MoEDAL-MAPPCollaboration, B. Acharya et al., “MoEDAL-MAPP, an LHC Dedicated Detector Search Facility,” in Snowmass 2021. 9, 2022.arXiv:2209.03988 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

Curtinet al., Rept

D. Curtin et al., “Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case,” Rept. Prog. Phys.82 no. 11, (2019) 116201,arXiv:1806.07396 [hep-ph]. [69]MA THUSLACollaboration, H. Lubatti et al., “Explore the lifetime frontier with MATHUSLA,” JINST15no. 06, (2020) C06026,arXiv:1901.04040 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[35]

Long Lived Particle Decays in MATHUSLA,

D. Curtin and J. S. Grewal, “Long Lived Particle Decays in MATHUSLA,”arXiv:2308.05860 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[36]

Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector,

G. Aielli et al., “Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 12, (2020) 1177, arXiv:1911.00481 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

ANUBIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts,

M. Bauer, O. Brandt, L. Lee, and C. Ohm, “ANUBIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts,”arXiv:1909.13022 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 1909
[38]

Searches for long-lived particles at the future FCC-ee,

A. Blondel et al., “Searches for long-lived particles at the future FCC-ee,” Front. in Phys.10(2022) 967881, arXiv:2203.05502 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

Physics with far detectors at future lepton colliders,

Z. S. Wang and K. Wang, “Physics with far detectors at future lepton colliders,” Phys. Rev. D101no. 7, (2020) 075046,arXiv:1911.06576 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

HECATE: A long-lived particle detector concept for the FCC-ee or CEPC,

M. Chrzkaszcz, M. Drewes, and J. Hajer, “HECATE: A long-lived particle detector concept for the FCC-ee or CEPC,” Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 6, (2021) 546,arXiv:2011.01005 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Near or far detectors? A case study for long-lived particle searches at electron-positron colliders,

R. Sch¨ afer, F. Tillinger, and S. Westhoff, “Near or far detectors? A case study for long-lived particle searches at electron-positron colliders,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 7, (2023) 076022,arXiv:2202.11714 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Exploring the potential of FCC-hh to search for particles from B mesons,

A. Boyarsky, O. Mikulenko, M. Ovchynnikov, and L. Shchutska, “Exploring the potential of FCC-hh to search for particles from B mesons,” JHEP01(2023) 042,arXiv:2204.01622 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Mammen Abraham, J

R. Mammen Abraham, J. Adhikary, J. L. Feng, M. Fieg, F. Kling, J. Li, J. Pei, T. R. Rabemananjara, J. Rojo, and S. Trojanowski, “FPF@FCC: Neutrino, QCD, and BSM Physics Opportunities with Far-Forward Experiments at a 100 TeV Proton Collider,”arXiv:2409.02163 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[44]

LAYCAST: LAYered CAvern Surface Tracker at future electron-positron colliders,

Y. Lu, Y.-n. Mao, K. Wang, and Z. S. Wang, “LAYCAST: LAYered CAvern Surface Tracker at future electron-positron colliders,”arXiv:2406.05770 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[45]

Light Fermionic WIMP Dark Matter with Light Scalar Mediator,

S. Matsumoto, Y.-L. S. Tsai, and P.-Y. Tseng, “Light Fermionic WIMP Dark Matter with Light Scalar Mediator,” JHEP07(2019) 050,arXiv:1811.03292 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[46]

Arcadi, A

G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, “Dark Matter through the Higgs portal,” Phys. Rept.842(2020) 1–180, arXiv:1903.03616 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[47]

The present and future status of heavy neutral leptons,

A. M. Abdullahi et al., “The present and future status of heavy neutral leptons,” J. Phys. G50no. 2, (2023) 020501, arXiv:2203.08039 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

Summary Report of Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN,

R. Alemany et al., “Summary Report of Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN,”arXiv:1902.00260 [hep-ex]. [84]PBCCollaboration, R. Alemany Fern´ andez et al., “Summary Report of the Physics Beyond Colliders Study at CERN,”arXiv:2505.00947 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 1902
[49]

Dark Higgs bosons at colliders,

T. Ferber, A. Grohsjean, and F. Kahlhoefer, “Dark Higgs bosons at colliders,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.136(2024) 104105,arXiv:2305.16169 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Design of a high power production target for the beam dump facility at cern,

E. Lopez Sola, M. Calviani, P. Avigni, M. Battistin, J. Busom Descarrega, J. Canhoto Espadanal, M. Fraser, S. Gilardoni, B. Goddard, D. Grenier, et al., “Design of a high power production target for the beam dump facility at cern,” Physical Review Accelerators and Beams22no. 11, (2019) 113001

2019
[51]

TZM Alloy Data Sheet

Plansee Group, “TZM Alloy Data Sheet.”https://www.plansee.com. Accessed: 2026

2026
[52]

Alloy C26000 – cartridge brass, 70%

Copper Development Association, “Alloy C26000 – cartridge brass, 70%.”https://alloys.copper.org/alloy/C26000. 20 Accessed: 2024

2024
[53]

Isostatic hot pressed W–Cu composites with nanosized grain boundaries: Microstructure, structure and radiation shielding efficiency against gamma rays,

G. Bondarenko et al., “Isostatic hot pressed W–Cu composites with nanosized grain boundaries: Microstructure, structure and radiation shielding efficiency against gamma rays,” Materials15(2022) 3240

2022
[54]

How borated polyethylene works

MarShield Custom Radiation Products, “How borated polyethylene works.” https://marshield.com/borated-polyethylene-how-it-works/. Accessed: 2024

2024
[55]

Studies on RPC detectors operated with environmentally friendly gas mixtures in LHC-like conditions,

G. Rigoletti, R. Guida, and B. Mandelli, “Studies on RPC detectors operated with environmentally friendly gas mixtures in LHC-like conditions,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus138no. 9, (2023) 841

2023
[56]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al., “A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3,” SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022(2022) 8,arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[57]

Fcc-hh: The hadron collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 3,

F. collaboration et al., “Fcc-hh: The hadron collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 3,” European Physical Journal Special Topics228no. 4, (2019) 755–1107

2019
[58]

The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures,

W. J. Huang et al., “The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures,” Chin. Phys. C45no. 3, (2021) 030002

2020
[59]

Table of Nuclides

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, “Table of Nuclides.”https://atom.kaeri.re.kr/. Accessed: January 2025. [96]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

2025
[60]

GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit,

S. Agostinelli et al., “GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250–303

2003
[61]

Geant4physics lists for hep,

J. Apostolakis et al., “Geant4physics lists for hep,” Tech. Rep. CERN-OPEN-2020-004, CERN, 2020. https://geant4.web.cern.ch/support/physics_lists

2020
[62]

Recent developments in Geant4,

J. Allison et al., “Recent developments in Geant4,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A835(2016) 186–225

2016
[63]

Energetic long-lived particles in the cms muon chambers,

A. Mitridate, M. Papucci, C. W. Wang, C. Pe˜ na, and S. Xie, “Energetic long-lived particles in the cms muon chambers,” Physical Review D108no. 5, (2023) 055040

2023
[64]

From obstacle to opportunity: Uncovering the silver lining of pileup,

B. Bhattacherjee, A. Kumar, S. Mukherjee, R. Sengupta, and A. Sharma, “From obstacle to opportunity: Uncovering the silver lining of pileup,” Physics Letters B873(2026) 140121. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269325008779

2026
[65]

Future circular collider: Overview

CERN, “Future circular collider: Overview.”https://fcc.web.cern.ch/overview. Accessed: 2026-03-25

2026
[66]

High-luminosity LHC project schedule

CERN, “High-luminosity LHC project schedule.” https://project-hl-lhc-industry.web.cern.ch/content/project-schedule, n.d. Accessed: 2026-03-16. [104]CMSCollaboration, A. Rossi, “The CMS Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC,” tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2023. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2816248

work page arXiv 2026
[67]

A MIP timing detector for the CMS phase-2 upgrade,

CMS Collaboration, “A MIP timing detector for the CMS phase-2 upgrade,” Tech. Rep. CERN-LHCC-2019-003, CMS-TDR-020, CERN, 2019.https://cds.cern.ch/record/2667167

work page arXiv 2019
[68]

Precision timing at the HL-LHC with the CMS MIP timing detector: current progress on validation and production,

CMS Collaboration, “Precision timing at the HL-LHC with the CMS MIP timing detector: current progress on validation and production,”arXiv:2601.12498 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv
[69]

Identification of Long-lived Charged Particles using Time-Of-Flight Systems at the Upgraded LHC detectors,

O. Cerri, S. Xie, C. Pena, and M. Spiropulu, “Identification of Long-lived Charged Particles using Time-Of-Flight Systems at the Upgraded LHC detectors,” JHEP04(2019) 037,arXiv:1807.05453 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[70]

HepMC3: A new version of the HepMC event record,

C. Bierlich et al., “HepMC3: A new version of the HepMC event record,” Comput. Phys. Commun.260(2021) 107310, arXiv:1912.08005 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[71]

The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm,” JHEP04(2008) 063,arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2008
[72]

pyjet: The interface between FastJet and NumPy

N. Dawe et al., “pyjet: The interface between FastJet and NumPy.”https://github.com/scikit-hep/pyjet, 2018

2018
[73]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual,” Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]. 21 Appendix A TABLE A.1: Ratio of particle yields withE >1 GeV, for C26000 relative to WCu80 under pion bombardment at different energies and shield thicknesses, for simulated 1000 events. A value greater than 1 indicates higher secondary ...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012