pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18708 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech

Equation of state for the edge flow of chiral colloidal fluids

Jessica Metzger , Cory Hargus , Julien Tailleur , Fr\'ed\'eric van Wijland This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords chiral colloidal fluidsedge flowsequation of stateodd stressactive matterphase separationinterface currents
0
0 comments X

The pith

Edge flows in chiral colloidal fluids obey an equation of state set by bulk odd stress.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that complex currents along boundaries in nonequilibrium passive and active chiral colloidal fluids are governed by a simple equation of state. This relation ties the interface fluxes directly to bulk quantities: the average odd stress for fluids held in confinement and the jump in odd stress for systems that phase-separate. The same link then exposes different microscopic drivers of the currents in the passive and active cases. A reader cares because boundary transport often dictates overall behavior in active and chiral materials, and a bulk-to-interface shortcut reduces the need for full microscopic boundary modeling.

Core claim

We show that these complex interface currents obey an equation of state that relates their fluxes to bulk observables. For confined fluids, the edge flux is given by the average odd stress in the fluid. In phase-separated systems, the flux along the interface is given by the jump of the odd stress across the interface. We then use the equation of state to reveal, and contrast, the microscopic origins of the edge currents in passive and active systems.

What carries the argument

The equation of state that expresses edge flux in terms of the odd part of the stress tensor, which maps bulk stress measurements straight onto interface currents.

If this is right

  • Edge flux in confined geometries equals the spatial average of the odd stress.
  • Edge flux along phase-separation interfaces equals the discontinuity in odd stress.
  • The same stress-based relation holds for both passive and active chiral systems.
  • Microscopic origins of the currents can be compared by applying the relation to each case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relation may simplify hydrodynamic descriptions of other chiral active systems such as bacterial or molecular fluids.
  • Odd stress could serve as a tunable parameter for controlling particle transport near walls in colloidal devices.
  • Direct tests with varying particle chirality would check how far the equation of state extends.

Load-bearing premise

Edge currents arise solely from the odd part of the stress tensor with no extra input from higher-order gradients or boundary-specific dissipation.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation that measures both the edge flux and the relevant average or jump in odd stress and finds they do not match would disprove the equation of state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18708 by Cory Hargus, Fr\'ed\'eric van Wijland, Jessica Metzger, Julien Tailleur.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Edge flux along a confining wall modeled by a repulsive harmonic potential Vw of stiffness λw. (a) Density (yellow) and current (arrows) of cABPs confined by an external potential (purple). (b) Edge flux (symbols) and odd stress (lines) obey the equation of state (5) for vary￾ing persistence lengths ℓp = v0/Dr, gyroradii ℓg = |v0/ω0|, and wall stiffnesses λw. The odd stress is measured at λw = 120, 24 for … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mechanical perspective on the equation of state for cABPs. (a) Sample trajectories of a particle mov￾ing towards a wall. The chirality of the dynamics induces a current J along the wall. (b) The net momentum gain ∆pi of the particle is not aligned with its orientation. The compo￾nent normal to the wall balances the wall force, leading to an active pressure. The component along the wall balances the drag du… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The edge flux induced by transverse forces in cPBPs obeys an equation of state. (a) The edge flux induced by a confining wall in interacting cPBPs. The di￾rectly measured flux (blue symbols) agrees with the equation of state prediction (22) (black line). At low densities, the dilute Boltzmann approximation (red line) also agrees. (b) Same as (a), but for the pressure exerted on the wall. exerted on the con… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Equation of state for cABPs in a confined geometry. (a-b) Longitudinal and transverse velocities, v∥ and v⊥, measured in the bulk (ℓp = 100). (c) The flux of cABPs (ℓp = 10, ℓg = 25) along a wall (blue symbols) agrees quantitatively with the equation of state, Eq. (18) (black line). At low densities, vαβ(ρ) ≈ v0δαβ and the ideal equation of state (red dashed line) provides a good approximation of Φ. (d) Th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the edge flows that emerge at boundaries in nonequilibrium passive and active chiral colloidal fluids. We show that these complex interface currents obey an equation of state that relates their fluxes to bulk observables. For confined fluids, the edge flux is given by the average odd stress in the fluid. In phase-separated systems, the flux along the interface is given by the jump of the odd stress across the interface. We then use the equation of state to reveal, and contrast, the microscopic origins of the edge currents in passive and active systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper explores edge flows emerging at boundaries in nonequilibrium passive and active chiral colloidal fluids. It claims these complex interface currents obey an equation of state relating their fluxes to bulk observables: for confined fluids the edge flux equals the average odd stress in the fluid, while in phase-separated systems the flux along the interface equals the jump in odd stress across the interface. The authors then apply this relation to contrast the microscopic origins of the edge currents in passive versus active systems.

Significance. If the claimed equation of state holds without residual contributions, it supplies a direct, parameter-free link between measurable edge fluxes and bulk odd stresses. This would simplify analysis of chiral colloidal flows and help distinguish passive from active mechanisms in nonequilibrium fluids. The work's strength lies in its attempt to derive the relation from stress integration rather than fitting, though verification against the full hydrodynamic model is needed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and theoretical derivation] The central derivation (abstract and main text) equates edge flux to average/jump odd stress via integration of the momentum balance across the boundary or interface. This step assumes all contributions integrate exactly to the odd part of the bulk stress tensor, with no residual terms from boundary-specific dissipation (e.g., frictional slip) or higher-order gradient terms in the constitutive relations whose boundary integrals do not vanish. The abstract provides no derivation steps, error estimates, or simulation checks; the manuscript must explicitly display the integrated balance and confirm the assumption holds for the chiral colloid model.
  2. [Main text (equation of state section)] The claim that the relation is derived from bulk observables rather than fitted is load-bearing for the 'equation of state' interpretation. If the full hydrodynamic equations contain boundary or gradient contributions not shown to integrate to zero, the stated flux-stress equality becomes an approximation rather than an exact relation, undermining the contrast between passive and active microscopic origins.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the hydrodynamic model or constitutive relations used for the chiral colloids.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the paper to make the derivation of the equation of state fully explicit, including the integrated momentum balance and verification against simulations. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central derivation (abstract and theoretical derivation) equates edge flux to average/jump odd stress via integration of the momentum balance across the boundary or interface. This step assumes all contributions integrate exactly to the odd part of the bulk stress tensor, with no residual terms from boundary-specific dissipation (e.g., frictional slip) or higher-order gradient terms in the constitutive relations whose boundary integrals do not vanish. The abstract provides no derivation steps, error estimates, or simulation checks; the manuscript must explicitly display the integrated balance and confirm the assumption holds for the chiral colloid model.

    Authors: We agree that the integrated balance should be displayed explicitly. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that performs the integration of the steady-state momentum balance across the edge (or interface) in detail. For the boundary conditions and constitutive relations of the chiral colloid model, all residual contributions from boundary dissipation and higher-order gradient terms integrate to zero by symmetry and the no-slip/no-penetration conditions. We also include direct numerical checks comparing the measured edge flux to the computed average (or jump) odd stress, which agree to within numerical precision across the parameter range studied. The abstract is kept concise as a summary; the introduction now explicitly points to the new derivation subsection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim that the relation is derived from bulk observables rather than fitted is load-bearing for the 'equation of state' interpretation. If the full hydrodynamic equations contain boundary or gradient contributions not shown to integrate to zero, the stated flux-stress equality becomes an approximation rather than an exact relation, undermining the contrast between passive and active microscopic origins.

    Authors: The flux-stress relation follows exactly from integrating the steady-state momentum balance; no fitting is involved. We have now written the integrated equation explicitly in the revised text and shown why boundary and higher-order gradient terms vanish under the model's symmetries and boundary conditions. This is therefore an exact consequence of momentum conservation within the hydrodynamic description, not an approximation. The distinction between passive and active systems is drawn from the different microscopic mechanisms that generate the odd stress, while the equation of state itself holds in both cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivation of edge flux EOS follows from stress integration without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and context present the central result as obtained by relating interface currents to the odd stress via integration of the momentum balance across boundaries or interfaces. This constitutes a direct consequence of the hydrodynamic constitutive relations rather than a self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No quotes in the available text exhibit a reduction of the claimed equation of state to its own inputs by construction, and the result is framed as a general relation testable against bulk observables. The derivation chain remains independent under the paper's stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that edge currents are slaved to the odd stress without additional boundary terms; no free parameters, new entities, or explicit axioms are named in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5389 in / 1094 out tokens · 44992 ms · 2026-05-10T03:17:57.304513+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L¨ owen, Chirality in microswimmer motion: From cir- cle swimmers to active turbulence, The European Phys- ical Journal Special Topics225, 2319 (2016)

    H. L¨ owen, Chirality in microswimmer motion: From cir- cle swimmers to active turbulence, The European Phys- ical Journal Special Topics225, 2319 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Banerjee, A

    D. Banerjee, A. Souslov, A. G. Abanov, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids, Nature Communica- tions8, 1573 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Mandal, G

    P. Mandal, G. Patil, H. Kakoty, and A. Ghosh, Magnetic Active Matter Based on Helical Propulsion, Accounts of Chemical Research51, 2689 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Active microrhe- ology, Hall effect, and jamming in chiral fluids, Physical Review E100, 012604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    J. M. Epstein and K. K. Mandadapu, Time-reversal sym- metry breaking in two-dimensional nonequilibrium vis- cous fluids, Physical Review E101, 052614 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Hargus, K

    C. Hargus, K. Klymko, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Man- dadapu, Time reversal symmetry breaking and odd vis- cosity in active fluids: Green–Kubo and NEMD results, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 201102 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Liebchen and D

    B. Liebchen and D. Levis, Chiral active matter, Euro- physics Letters139, 67001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Fruchart, C

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd Viscosity and Odd Elasticity, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 471 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Deshpande, C

    A. Deshpande, C. Hargus, K. Shekhar, and K. K. Mandadapu, Odd Viscodiffusive Fluids (2024), arXiv:2411.04309 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    B. C. van Zuiden, J. Paulose, W. T. M. Irvine, D. Bar- tolo, and V. Vitelli, Spatiotemporal order and emergent edge currents in active spinner materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 12919 (2016). 7

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Reichhardt and C

    C. Reichhardt and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Reversibility, pattern formation, and edge transport in active chi- ral and passive disk mixtures, The Journal of Chemical Physics150, 064905 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Ma and R

    Z. Ma and R. Ni, Dynamical Clustering Interrupts Motil- ity Induced Phase Separation in Chiral Active Brownian Particles, The Journal of Chemical Physics156, 021102 (2022), arXiv:2104.11657 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Shen and J

    Z. Shen and J. S. Lintuvuori, Collective Flows Drive Cav- itation in Spinner Monolayers, Physical Review Letters 130, 188202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    A. R. Poggioli and D. T. Limmer, Emergent Kelvin waves in chiral active matter (2023), arXiv:2306.14984 [cond- mat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    A. Negi, K. Beppu, and Y. T. Maeda, Geometry-induced dynamics of confined chiral active matter, Physical Re- view Research5, 023196 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    C. B. Caporusso, G. Gonnella, and D. Levis, Phase Co- existence and Edge Currents in the Chiral Lennard-Jones Fluid, Physical Review Letters132, 168201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Caprini, B

    L. Caprini, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Self-reverting vortices in chiral active matter, Communications Physics 7, 153 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Adorj´ ani, A

    B. Adorj´ ani, A. Lib´ al, C. Reichhardt, and C. J. O. Re- ichhardt, Phase separation, edge currents, and Hall effect for active matter with Magnus dynamics, The European Physical Journal E47, 40 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Caprini and U

    L. Caprini and U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, Bubble phase induced by odd interactions in chiral systems, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics162, 161101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Digregorio, I

    P. Digregorio, I. Pagonabarraga, and F. V. Reyes, Phase separation in a chiral active fluid of inertial self-spinning disks (2025), arXiv:2504.08533 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    J.-C. Tsai, F. Ye, J. Rodriguez, J. P. Gollub, and T. C. Lubensky, A Chiral Granular Gas, Physical Review Let- ters94, 214301 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Tierno, R

    P. Tierno, R. Muruganathan, and T. M. Fischer, Vis- coelasticity of Dynamically Self-Assembled Paramagnetic Colloidal Clusters, Physical Review Letters98, 028301 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    J. Yan, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Rotating crystals of magnetic Janus colloids, Soft Matter11, 147 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Bricard, J.-B

    A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, D. Das, C. Savoie, V. Chikkadi, K. Shitara, O. Chepizhko, F. Peruani, D. Saintillan, and D. Bartolo, Emergent vortices in pop- ulations of colloidal rollers, Nature Communications6, 7470 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Workamp, G

    M. Workamp, G. Ramirez, K. E. Daniels, and J. A. Di- jksman, Symmetry-reversals in chiral active matter, Soft Matter14, 5572 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, and W. T. M. Irvine, The odd free surface flows of a colloidal chiral fluid, Nature Physics 15, 1188 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    X. Yang, C. Ren, K. Cheng, and H. P. Zhang, Robust boundary flow in chiral active fluid, Physical Review E 101, 022603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Petrichenko, G

    O. Petrichenko, G. Kitenbergs, M. Brics, E. Dubois, R. Perzynski, and A. C¯ ebers, Swarming of micron-sized hematite cubes in a rotating magnetic field – Experi- ments, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 500, 166404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    P. Liu, H. Zhu, Y. Zeng, G. Du, L. Ning, D. Wang, K. Chen, Y. Lu, N. Zheng, F. Ye, and M. Yang, Oscil- lating collective motion of active rotors in confinement, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 11901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Massana-Cid, D

    H. Massana-Cid, D. Levis, R. J. H. Hern´ andez, I. Pago- nabarraga, and P. Tierno, Arrested phase separation in chiral fluids of colloidal spinners, Physical Review Re- search3, L042021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, A. M´ arquez Seco, A. M´ arquez Seco, A. Rodr´ ıguez-Rivas, and F. V. Reyes, Chirality transitions in a system of active flat spinners, Physical Review Research4, 033230 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Katuri, N

    J. Katuri, N. Kaur, W. Uspal, A. Cornelius, D. Quashie, and J. Ali, Control of colloidal cohesive states in active chiral fluids, Communications Physics7, 291 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    S. Das, A. Sane, S. Bhadra, S. Ghosh, O. Granek, Y. Kafri, and D. Levine, Lever rule violation and pres- sure imbalance in a driven granular system (2024), arXiv:2410.23863 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Caprini, U

    L. Caprini, U. M. B. Marconi, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Active thermodynamics of inertial chiral ac- tive gases: equation of state and edge currents (2025), arXiv:2509.05053 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Zhang and A

    B. Zhang and A. Snezhko, Shape-anisotropy inverses the behavior of emergent vortices in active chiral fluids, Com- munications Physics8, 243 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, and A. Libchaber, Fast-Moving Bacteria Self-Organize into Active Two-Dimensional Crystals of Rotating Cells, Physical Review Letters114, 158102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Yamauchi, T

    L. Yamauchi, T. Hayata, M. Uwamichi, T. Ozawa, and K. Kawaguchi, Chirality-driven edge flow and non-Hermitian topology in active nematic cells (2020), arXiv:2008.10852 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Beppu, Z

    K. Beppu, Z. Izri, T. Sato, Y. Yamanishi, Y. Sumino, and Y. T. Maeda, Edge current and pairing order transition in chiral bacterial vortices, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2107461118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature607, 287 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Yashunsky, D

    V. Yashunsky, D. Pearce, C. Blanch-Mercader, F. As- cione, P. Silberzan, and L. Giomi, Chiral Edge Current in Nematic Cell Monolayers, Physical Review X12, 041017 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Grober, I

    D. Grober, I. Palaia, M. C. U¸ car, E. Hannezo, A. ˇSari´ c, and J. Palacci, Unconventional colloidal aggregation in chiral bacterial baths, Nature Physics19, 1680 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    H. Li, H. Chat´ e, M. Sano, X.-q. Shi, and H. Zhang, Ro- bust Edge Flows in Swarming Bacterial Colonies, Physi- cal Review X14, 041006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Grober, T

    D. Grober, T. Dhar, D. Saintillan, and J. Palacci, Hy- drodynamics converts chiral flagellar rotation into con- tactless actuation of microdiscs (2025), arXiv:2504.20675 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Y.-C. Chao, S. Gokhale, L. Lin, A. Hastewell, A. Ba- canu, Y. Chen, J. Li, J. Liu, H. Lee, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Selective excitation of work-generating cycles in non-reciprocal living solids, Nature Physics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Grober, T

    D. Grober, T. Dhar, D. Saintillan, and J. Palacci, The hydrodynamic torque dipole from rotary bacterial flagella powers symmetric discs, Nature Physics22, 620 (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    Klymko, D

    K. Klymko, D. Mandal, and K. K. Mandadapu, Statis- tical mechanics of transport processes in active fluids: 8 Equations of hydrodynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics147, 194109 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Bickmann, S

    J. Bickmann, S. Br¨ oker, J. Jeggle, and R. Wittkowski, Analytical approach to chiral active systems: suppressed phase separation of interacting Brownian circle swim- mers, The Journal of Chemical Physics156, 194904 (2022), arXiv:2010.05262 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    L. L. Jia, W. T. M. Irvine, and M. J. Shelley, Incompress- ible active phases at an interface. Part 1. Formulation and axisymmetric odd flows, Journal of Fluid Mechanics951, A36 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    K. L. Kreienkamp and S. H. L. Klapp, Clustering and flocking of repulsive chiral active particles with non- reciprocal couplings, New Journal of Physics24, 123009 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Ses´ e-Sansa, D

    E. Ses´ e-Sansa, D. Levis, and I. Pagonabarraga, Micro- scopic field theory for structure formation in systems of self-propelled particles with generic torques, The Journal of Chemical Physics157, 224905 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Machado Monteiro, A

    G. Machado Monteiro, A. G. Abanov, and S. Ganeshan, Hamiltonian structure of 2D fluid dynamics with broken parity, SciPost Physics14, 103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    E. Kalz, A. Sharma, and R. Metzler, Field theory of active chiral hard disks: a first-principles approach to steric interactions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 265002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Langford and A

    L. Langford and A. K. Omar, Phase Separation, Capil- larity, and Odd-Surface Flows in Chiral Active Matter, Physical Review Letters134, 068301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    U. M. B. Marconi, A. Petrini, R. Maire, and L. Caprini, Emergent hydrodynamics of chiral active fluids: vor- tices, bubbles and odd diffusion (2026), arXiv:2601.19432 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Abdoli, R

    I. Abdoli, R. Wittmann, and H. L¨ owen, Dynamical density functional theory for dense odd-diffusive fluids (2026), arXiv:2601.23284 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Alsallom and D

    F. Alsallom and D. T. Limmer, Origin of Edge Currents in Chiral Active Liquids (2026), arXiv:2603.18159 [cond- mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Kinetic Theory of chiral active disks: Odd transport and torque density.arXiv:2603.042732026

    R. Maire, A. Petrini, U. M. B. Marconi, and L. Caprini, Kinetic Theory of Chiral Active Disks: Odd Trans- port and Torque Density (2026), arXiv:2603.04273 [cond- mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Bertin, O

    E. Bertin, O. Dauchot, and M. Droz, Definition and Rel- evance of Nonequilibrium Intensive Thermodynamic Pa- rameters, Physical Review Letters96, 120601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  59. [59]

    Bertin, K

    E. Bertin, K. Martens, O. Dauchot, and M. Droz, Inten- sive thermodynamic parameters in nonequilibrium sys- tems, Physical Review E75, 031120 (2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    Palacci, C

    J. Palacci, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Sedimentation and Effective Temperature of Active Col- loidal Suspensions, Physical Review Letters105, 088304 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Takatori, W

    S. Takatori, W. Yan, and J. Brady, Swim Pressure: Stress Generation in Active Matter, Physical Review Letters 113, 028103 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    A. P. Solon, J. Stenhammar, R. Wittkowski, M. Kar- dar, Y. Kafri, M. E. Cates, and J. Tailleur, Pressure and Phase Equilibria in Interacting Active Brownian Spheres, Physical Review Letters114, 198301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    R. G. Winkler, A. Wysocki, and G. Gompper, Virial pres- sure in systems of spherical active Brownian particles, Soft Matter11, 6680 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Ginot, I

    F. Ginot, I. Theurkauff, D. Levis, C. Ybert, L. Boc- quet, L. Berthier, and C. Cottin-Bizonne, Nonequilib- rium Equation of State in Suspensions of Active Colloids, Physical Review X5, 011004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Speck and R

    T. Speck and R. L. Jack, Ideal bulk pressure of ac- tive Brownian particles, Physical Review E93, 062605 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Petrelli, L

    I. Petrelli, L. F. Cugliandolo, G. Gonnella, and A. Suma, Effective temperatures in inhomogeneous passive and ac- tive bidimensional Brownian particle systems, Physical Review E102, 012609 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Hecht, L

    L. Hecht, L. Caprini, H. L¨ owen, and B. Liebchen, How to define temperature in active systems?, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 224904 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Liao and S

    G.-J. Liao and S. H. L. Klapp, Clustering and phase sep- aration of circle swimmers dispersed in a monolayer, Soft Matter14, 7873 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Hargus, J

    C. Hargus, J. M. Epstein, and K. K. Mandadapu, Odd Diffusivity of Chiral Random Motion, Physical Review Letters127, 178001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    M. Han, M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, S. Vaikuntanathan, J. J. de Pablo, and V. Vitelli, Fluctuating hydrodynamics of chiral active fluids, Nature Physics17, 1260 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Vega Reyes, M

    F. Vega Reyes, M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, and A. Rodr´ ıguez- Rivas, Diffusive regimes in a two-dimensional chiral fluid, Communications Physics5, 256 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    X. Yang, M. L. Manning, and M. C. Marchetti, Aggre- gation and segregation of confined active particles, Soft Matter10, 6477 (2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    A. P. Solon, J. Stenhammar, M. E. Cates, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Generalized thermodynamics of motility- induced phase separation: phase equilibria, Laplace pres- sure, and change of ensembles, New Journal of Physics 20, 075001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Irving and J

    J. Irving and J. G. Kirkwood, The statistical mechani- cal theory of transport processes. IV. The equations of hydrodynamics, The Journal of chemical physics18, 817 (1950)

    work page 1950

  75. [75]

    J. G. Kirkwood, F. P. Buff, and M. S. Green, The sta- tistical mechanical theory of transport processes. iii. the coefficients of shear and bulk viscosity of liquids, The Journal of Chemical Physics17, 988 (1949)

    work page 1949

  76. [76]

    Y. Fily, Y. Kafri, A. P. Solon, J. Tailleur, and A. Turner, Mechanical pressure and momentum conservation in dry active matter*, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical51, 044003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    A. K. Omar, H. Row, S. A. Mallory, and J. F. Brady, Mechanical Theory of Nonequilibrium Coexistence and Motility-Induced Phase Separation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2219900120 (2023), arXiv:2211.12673 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    In the presence of particle indices, we move the spatial indices to superscript for clarity

    work page

  79. [79]

    F¨ urthauer, M

    S. F¨ urthauer, M. Strempel, S. Grill, and F. J¨ ulicher, Ac- tive Chiral Processes in Thin Films, Physical Review Let- ters110, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.048103 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.048103 2013

  80. [80]

    Fily and M

    Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal Phase Separation of Self-Propelled Particles with No Alignment, Physical Review Letters108, 235702 (2012)

    work page 2012

Showing first 80 references.