arxiv: 2604.18733 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Gauging in superconductors and other electronic systems

Marcus Berg , Andrea Cappelli , Riccardo Villa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords superconductorstopological orderBF theoryspin_c connectiongravito-magnetic anomalyHiggs modelbosonizationgauging

0 comments

The pith

The Higgs model for superconductors reduces at low energies to BF theory with a spin_c gauge field, endowing them with a gravito-magnetic anomaly that forbids trivial massive phases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Ordinary s-wave superconductors are topological phases of matter where the dynamical gauge field produces less understood global features. The paper shows that at very low energies the Higgs model reduces to BF theory exhibiting topological order, with the gauge field required to be a spin_c connection to capture the spin of fermions in Cooper pairs. Although gauging renders the systems bosonic, they retain a gravito-magnetic anomaly as a remnant of fermionic origin, linked to bosonization through gauging of fermion parity. This anomaly applies broadly to gauged electronic matter in three and four spacetime dimensions, ruling out trivial massive phases at low energy, and it extends beyond the Higgs model to other superconductors and the massless phase of three-dimensional electrodynamics.

Core claim

At very low energies, the Higgs model reduces to the BF theory, which exhibits topological order. Furthermore, the gauge field must be a spin_c connection, to describe the spin of fermions forming Cooper pairs. Gauging implies that superconductors are inherently bosonic systems, yet they are endowed with a gravito-magnetic anomaly that is the remnant of their fermionic origin. This anomaly is related to the bosonization achieved via gauging fermion parity, now included in the gauge dynamics, and characterizes gauged electronic matter in three and four dimensions, forbidding trivial massive phases at low energy.

What carries the argument

Reduction of the Higgs model to BF theory with spin_c gauge connections that carry a gravito-magnetic anomaly from gauged fermion parity.

If this is right

The anomaly persists in other kinds of superconductors beyond the s-wave Higgs model.
It appears in the nontrivial massless phase of three-dimensional electrodynamics.
Trivial massive phases are forbidden at low energy for gauged electronic matter in three and four dimensions.
The description holds beyond the validity of the Higgs model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The anomaly may serve as a general obstruction to trivial gapped phases in any gauged electronic system in low dimensions.
Low-energy experiments on superconductors could search for indirect signatures of this gravito-magnetic anomaly through response functions tied to topological order.
The spin_c requirement suggests that similar structures could appear in other paired fermionic systems when gauged.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy limit of the Higgs model is exactly BF theory with the stated spin_c structure, and the gravito-magnetic anomaly survives beyond the Higgs regime without additional cancellations.

What would settle it

An experimental or computational demonstration that a gauged superconductor enters a trivial massive phase at low energies without topological signatures or anomaly indicators would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18733 by Andrea Cappelli, Marcus Berg, Riccardo Villa.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: In the fusion of two G defects, an A defect is also emitted, as in (3.3). It is convenient here to think about G as defining a principal G bundle over X, which is specified by a map, which we call G again, G : X → BG [49, 50], so that G ∗α ∈ Z 2 (X; A) is the pullback of α. G is a source for A: the symmetry defects of A can end on G-defects and thus the gauge field of A is no longer closed when G ̸= 0. Ano… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Gauging U(1)f in (3.22) and (3.23) in one and two steps. Direct gauging is the top arrow, the two-step gauging is the two-arrow lower path, where one first gauges Z f 2 (bosonization) and then gauges the residual bosonic U(1)b, recovering the same final theory and gravito-magnetic anomaly. Therefore, the bosonic symmetry Z (d−2) 2 is part of the topological data of the magnetic symmetry U(1)(d−3) m of U(1)… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Ordinary, s-wave superconductors have been recognized as being topological phases of matter, in which the dynamical gauge field implies less understood global features. Using the tools of topological field theories and generalized symmetries, we provide an updated description of these systems. At very low energies, the Higgs model reduces to the BF theory, which exhibits topological order. Furthermore, the gauge field must be a spin$_c$ connection, to describe the spin of fermions forming Cooper pairs. Gauging implies that superconductors are inherently bosonic systems, yet they are endowed with a gravito-magnetic anomaly that is the remnant of their fermionic origin. We recognize that this anomaly is related to the Gaiotto-Kapustin-Thorngren bosonization, achieved via gauging fermion parity $(-1)^F$, now included in the gauge dynamics. This anomaly characterizes gauged electronic matter in great generality in three and four spacetime dimensions, forbidding trivial massive phases at low energy. It holds beyond the validity of the Higgs model, nd in other kinds of superconductors as well. It also appears in the nontrivial massless phase of three-dimensional electrodynamics, recently understood.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper frames superconductors via BF theory reduction and a gravito-magnetic anomaly from gauging (-1)^F, but the key steps remain stated rather than derived in detail.

read the letter

The core claim is that the Abelian Higgs model at very low energies reduces to BF theory with topological order, the photon is a spin_c connection, and a remnant gravito-magnetic anomaly from fermionic origins forbids trivial massive phases in 3D/4D gauged electronic systems. This anomaly is tied to GKT bosonization and is said to hold more generally beyond the Higgs regime, including in other superconductors and massless 3D QED. The paper does a reasonable job of assembling these existing pieces—topological field theory, BF theory, spin_c structures, and anomaly matching—into a single description that explains why gauged superconductors carry global features not obvious from the microscopic fermionic starting point. The extension to general gauged matter and the link to forbidding trivial gapped phases is a clean conceptual move that could help organize thinking in the generalized-symmetries literature. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: the abstract asserts the reduction to BF theory and the survival of the anomaly without cancellations, but provides no explicit effective-action matching, anomaly-coefficient computation, or check against higher-order terms or integrated-out modes. If the full text contains those derivations and they hold, the argument strengthens; from the given material the logical chain still rests on identifications whose independence from prior work is not yet shown. This is aimed at people already working at the condensed-matter/high-energy interface who want a symmetry-language account of superconducting phases. A reader looking for new observables or falsifiable predictions will find less, but the framing itself is worth seeing in full. It deserves peer review so referees can verify whether the anomaly really persists as claimed once the calculations are on the table.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that ordinary s-wave superconductors are topological phases of matter. At very low energies the Abelian Higgs model reduces to BF theory (exhibiting topological order), the dynamical gauge field must be taken as a spin_c connection to encode the spin of the fermions forming Cooper pairs, and gauging fermion parity (-1)^F produces a gravito-magnetic anomaly (remnant of the fermionic origin and related to GKT bosonization) that characterizes gauged electronic matter in 3D and 4D, forbids trivial massive phases at low energy, and persists beyond the Higgs regime into other superconductors and the massless phase of 3D electrodynamics.

Significance. If the reduction to BF theory and the anomaly coefficient are shown to hold without cancellations, the work would supply a unified TFT-plus-generalized-symmetry description of the global features of superconductors and other gauged electronic systems, with concrete implications for the absence of trivial gapped phases. The explicit connection drawn to GKT bosonization via dynamical gauging of (-1)^F is a potentially useful organizing principle.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and § on low-energy limit] The central assertion that the Higgs model reduces exactly to BF theory at very low energies (with the stated spin_c structure) is load-bearing for the topological-order claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit effective-action matching, limit procedure, or verification that higher-order terms do not alter the topological sector.
[Abstract and § on anomaly] The claim that the gravito-magnetic anomaly survives without additional cancellations when the description is extended beyond the Higgs regime (and to general gauged electronic matter) is load-bearing for the statement that trivial massive phases are forbidden; no anomaly-coefficient calculation or check for contributions from integrated-out massive modes is supplied.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Typo in the abstract: 'nd' should read 'and'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised concern the explicitness of our derivations for the low-energy reduction and the anomaly persistence. We address each below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and § on low-energy limit] The central assertion that the Higgs model reduces exactly to BF theory at very low energies (with the stated spin_c structure) is load-bearing for the topological-order claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit effective-action matching, limit procedure, or verification that higher-order terms do not alter the topological sector.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit derivation of the effective action in the low-energy limit. In the revised version, we will add a subsection that outlines the limit procedure from the Abelian Higgs model to BF theory. This will include the integration of massive modes, confirmation that the topological sector is preserved, and the incorporation of the spin_c connection to account for the fermionic spin. While this reduction follows from standard techniques in the literature on topological phases, we agree that spelling out the steps will strengthen the presentation and address the concern directly. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and § on anomaly] The claim that the gravito-magnetic anomaly survives without additional cancellations when the description is extended beyond the Higgs regime (and to general gauged electronic matter) is load-bearing for the statement that trivial massive phases are forbidden; no anomaly-coefficient calculation or check for contributions from integrated-out massive modes is supplied.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that an explicit anomaly-coefficient calculation, including verification against contributions from integrated-out modes, would better support the claim of persistence beyond the Higgs regime. We will revise the manuscript to include such a calculation, drawing on the relation to GKT bosonization via dynamical gauging of (-1)^F. This addition will demonstrate that the gravito-magnetic anomaly remains uncancelled and continues to forbid trivial massive phases for gauged electronic systems in 3D and 4D, including in the massless phase of 3D electrodynamics. We view this as a valuable clarification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on standard TFT identifications without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The provided abstract and context assert that the Abelian Higgs model reduces to BF theory at low energies, that the gauge field is a spin_c connection, and that a gravito-magnetic anomaly (linked to GKT bosonization via gauging (-1)^F) persists and forbids trivial phases in 3D/4D gauged electronic systems. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are quoted that would make any central claim equivalent to its inputs by construction. The reductions are presented as consequences of topological field theory tools and generalized symmetries rather than tautological redefinitions or fitted inputs renamed as predictions. Since no load-bearing step reduces to a prior result by the same authors or to an ansatz smuggled via citation, and the derivation chain cannot be shown to collapse, the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks for the purpose of this circularity check.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard axioms of topological field theory and generalized symmetries without introducing new free parameters or invented entities visible at this level of detail.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The low-energy limit of the Higgs model is BF theory
Stated directly in the abstract as the starting point for the topological description.
domain assumption The gauge field for Cooper pairs is a spin_c connection
Required to encode the spin of fermions forming pairs; invoked without derivation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1434 out tokens · 21799 ms · 2026-05-10T03:43:47.099898+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Altland and B

A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2010

2010
[2]

Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics

E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2013

2013
[3]

Superconductivity for particular theorists,

S. Weinberg, “Superconductivity for particular theorists,”Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, vol. 86, pp. 43–53, 01 1986

1986
[4]

Superconductors are topologically or- dered,

T. Hansson, V. Oganesyan, and S. L. Sondhi, “Superconductors are topologically or- dered,”Annals of Physics, vol. 313, no. 2, pp. 497–538, 2004

2004
[5]

Generalized symmetries in condensed matter,

J. McGreevy, “Generalized symmetries in condensed matter,”Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics, vol. 14, pp. 57–82, 2023

2023
[6]

Quantum field theory anomalies in con- densed matter physics,

R. Arouca, A. Cappelli, and H. Hansson, “Quantum field theory anomalies in con- densed matter physics,”SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, p. 062, 2022

2022
[7]

Generalized global symmetries,

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized global symmetries,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 2

2015
[8]

Lecture Notes on Superconductivity: Condensed Matter and QCD,

R. Casalbuoni, “Lecture Notes on Superconductivity: Condensed Matter and QCD,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1810.11125, Oct. 2018

work page arXiv 2018
[9]

Thorngren, T

R. Thorngren, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, and A. Vishwanath, “Higgs Condensates are Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases: II.U(1) Gauge Theory and Supercon- ductors,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2303.08136, Mar. 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

Walker-wang models and axion electrody- namics,

C. W. von Keyserlingk and F. J. Burnell, “Walker-wang models and axion electrody- namics,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 91, p. 045134, Jan 2015

2015
[11]

Framed Wilson operators, fermionic strings, and gravitational anomaly in 4d,

R. Thorngren, “Framed Wilson operators, fermionic strings, and gravitational anomaly in 4d,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, p. 152, Feb. 2015

2015
[12]

Gapped boundary phases of topological insulators via weak coupling,

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Gapped boundary phases of topological insulators via weak coupling,”Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 2016, p. 12C101, Dec. 2016

2016
[13]

Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics

M. Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics. CRC press, 2018

2018
[14]

Bosonizations and dualities in 2+1 dimensions,

A. Cappelli and R. Villa, “Bosonizations and dualities in 2+1 dimensions,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2025, p. 107, July 2025

2025
[15]

Fermion path integrals and topological phases,

E. Witten, “Fermion path integrals and topological phases,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 88, no. 3, p. 035001, 2016. 55

2016
[16]

Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter,

D. Gaiotto and A. Kapustin, “Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter,”Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 31, pp. 1645044–184, Oct. 2016

2016
[17]

State sum constructions of spin-tfts and string net constructions of fermionic phases of matter,

L. Bhardwaj, D. Gaiotto, and A. Kapustin, “State sum constructions of spin-tfts and string net constructions of fermionic phases of matter,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, no. 4, pp. 1–79, 2017

2017
[18]

Charge-4e superconductivity from pair- density-wave order in certain high-temperature superconductors,

E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, “Charge-4e superconductivity from pair- density-wave order in certain high-temperature superconductors,”Nature Physics, vol. 5, pp. 830–833, Nov. 2009

2009
[19]

Charge-4esuperconductor with parafermionic vortices: A path to universal topological quantum computation,

Z. Darius Shi, Z. Han, S. Raghu, and A. Vishwanath, “Charge-4esuperconductor with parafermionic vortices: A path to universal topological quantum computation,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2602.06963, Feb. 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[20]

Primary charge-4e superconduc- tivity from doping a featureless Mott insulator,

Z.-Q. Gao, Y.-Q. Wang, Y.-H. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Primary charge-4e superconduc- tivity from doping a featureless Mott insulator,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2602.03925, Feb. 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[21]

Quantum Charge-4e Superconductivity and Deconfined Pseudocriticality in the Attractive SU(4) Hubbard Model

Z.-Q. Wan, H. Jiang, X. Zou, S. Zhang, and S.-K. Jian, “Quantum Charge-4e Su- perconductivity and Deconfined Pseudocriticality in the Attractive SU(4) Hubbard Model,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2604.14289, Apr. 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[22]

Charge-4e/6e superconductivity and chiral metal from 3D chiral superconductor

C.-T. Gao, C. Lu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Pan, and F. Yang, “Charge-4e/6e superconductivity and chiral metal from 3D chiral superconductor,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2604.12328, Apr. 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[23]

Topological Charge-2ne Superconduc- tors,

Z.-Q. Gao, Y.-Q. Wang, H. Yang, and C. Wu, “Topological Charge-2ne Superconduc- tors,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2512.21325, Dec. 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Anomalies and bosonization,

R. Thorngren, “Anomalies and bosonization,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 378, no. 3, pp. 1775–1816, 2020

2020
[25]

Fermionic spt phases in higher dimensions and bosonization,

A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Fermionic spt phases in higher dimensions and bosonization,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, no. 10, pp. 1–50, 2017

2017
[26]

Coupling a qft to a tqft and duality,

A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, “Coupling a qft to a tqft and duality,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 4, pp. 1–45, 2014

2014
[27]

Applied Conformal Field Theory

P. Ginsparg, “Applied conformal field theory,”arXiv preprint hep-th/9108028, 1988

work page Pith review arXiv 1988
[28]

A web of 2d dualities:Z 2 gauge fields and arf invariants,

A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner, “A web of 2d dualities:Z 2 gauge fields and arf invariants,”SciPost Physics, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 007, 2019

2019
[29]

Boyle Smith and Y

P. Boyle Smith and Y. Zheng, “Backfiring Bosonisation,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2403.03953, Mar. 2024. 56

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

On gauging Abelian extensions of finite and U(1) groups,

R. Villa, “On gauging Abelian extensions of finite and U(1) groups,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2603.22110, Mar. 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Symmetry Breaking from Monopole Condensation in QED 3,

T. T. Dumitrescu, P. Niro, and R. Thorngren, “Symmetry Breaking from Monopole Condensation in QED 3,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2410.05366, Oct. 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

From superconductors and four-manifolds to weak interactions,

E. Witten, “From superconductors and four-manifolds to weak interactions,”Bulletin of The American Mathematical Society - BULL AMER MATH SOC, vol. 44, pp. 361– 392, 07 2007

2007
[33]

Weinberg,The quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications. Cambridge University Press, 8 2013

2013
[34]

Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking

E. Lake, “Higher-form symmetries and spontaneous symmetry breaking,”arXiv e- prints, p. arXiv:1802.07747, Feb. 2018

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[35]

Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases,

M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 115147, Sep 2019

2019
[36]

Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,

T. D. Brennan, C. Cordova, and T. T. Dumitrescu, “Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2206.15401, June 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Consequences of symmetry frac- tionalization without 1-form global symmetries,

T. D. Brennan, T. Jacobson, and K. Roumpedakis, “Consequences of symmetry frac- tionalization without 1-form global symmetries,” 2025

2025
[38]

Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,

D. G. Delmastro, J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, and Z. Komargodski, “Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,”SciPost Physics, vol. 15, p. 079, Sept. 2023

2023
[39]

Generalized Symmetries Phase Transitions with Local Quantum Fields,

P.-S. Hsin, “Generalized Symmetries Phase Transitions with Local Quantum Fields,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2506.07688, June 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Symmetry-enriched quantum spin liquids in (3 + 1)d,

P.-S. Hsin and A. Turzillo, “Symmetry-enriched quantum spin liquids in (3 + 1)d,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2020, p. 22, Sept. 2020

2020
[41]

SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,

E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,” inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Con- ference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200, 7 2003

2003
[42]

V erresen, U

R. Verresen, U. Borla, A. Vishwanath, S. Moroz, and R. Thorngren, “Higgs Con- densates are Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases: I. Discrete Symmetries,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2211.01376, Nov. 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Discrete gauge symmetry in continuum theories,

L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, “Discrete gauge symmetry in continuum theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 62, pp. 1221–1223, Mar 1989. 57

1989
[44]

Question of the nonlocality of the aharonov-casher ef- fect,

B. Reznik and Y. Aharonov, “Question of the nonlocality of the aharonov-casher ef- fect,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 40, pp. 4178–4183, Dec 1989

1989
[45]

A duality web in 2+ 1 dimensions and condensed matter physics,

N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang, and E. Witten, “A duality web in 2+ 1 dimensions and condensed matter physics,”Annals of Physics, vol. 374, pp. 395–433, 2016

2016
[46]

Topological gauge theories and group cohomology,

R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, “Topological gauge theories and group cohomology,”Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 129, pp. 393–429, 1990

1990
[47]

On gauging finite subgroups,

Y. Tachikawa, “On gauging finite subgroups,”SciPost Phys., vol. 8, p. 015, 2020

2020
[48]

On finite symmetries and their gauging in two di- mensions,

L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, “On finite symmetries and their gauging in two di- mensions,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, p. 189, Mar. 2018

2018
[49]

Milnor and J

J. Milnor and J. Stasheff,Characteristic Classes. Annals of mathematics studies, Princeton University Press, 1974

1974
[50]

Fomenko and D

A. Fomenko and D. Fuchs,Homotopical Topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer International Publishing, 2016

2016
[51]

Lorentz symmetry fractionalization and dualities in (2+1)d,

P.-S. Hsin and S.-H. Shao, “Lorentz symmetry fractionalization and dualities in (2+1)d,”SciPost Physics, vol. 8, p. 018, Feb. 2020

2020
[52]

A new SU(2) anomaly,

J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, “A new SU(2) anomaly,”Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 60, p. 052301, May 2019

2019
[53]

Boyle Smith and J

P. Boyle Smith and J. Davighi, “Bosonisation Cohomology: Spin Structure Summation in Every Dimension,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2511.13718, Nov. 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Products of cocycles and extensions of mappings,

N. E. Steenrod, “Products of cocycles and extensions of mappings,”Annals of Math- ematics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 290–320, 1947

1947
[55]

Generalized spin structures on four dimensional space-times,

S. Avis and C. Isham, “Generalized spin structures on four dimensional space-times,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 72, pp. 103–118, 1980

1980
[56]

Anomaly enforced gaplessness and symmetry fractionalization for SpinG symmetries,

T. D. Brennan, “Anomaly enforced gaplessness and symmetry fractionalization for SpinG symmetries,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2024, p. 65, Feb. 2024

2024
[57]

Anomalies of 4dSpin G Theories,

T. D. Brennan and K. Intriligator, “Anomalies of 4dSpin G Theories,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2312.04756, Dec. 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Hsieh, Y

C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly inflow andp-form gauge theories,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2003.11550, Mar. 2020

work page arXiv 2003
[59]

Anomalies and Invertible Field Theories,

D. S. Freed, “Anomalies and Invertible Field Theories,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1404.7224, Apr. 2014. 58

work page arXiv 2014
[60]

Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology,

A. Kapustin, “Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1403.1467, Mar. 2014

work page arXiv 2014
[61]

Bosonic Topological Insulators and Paramagnets: a view from cobor- disms,

A. Kapustin, “Bosonic Topological Insulators and Paramagnets: a view from cobor- disms,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1404.6659, Apr. 2014

work page arXiv 2014
[62]

Fermionic symmetry protected topological phases and cobordisms,

A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo, and Z. Wang, “Fermionic symmetry protected topological phases and cobordisms,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, p. 52, Dec. 2015

2015
[63]

On the Cobordism Classification of Symmetry Protected Topological Phases,

K. Yonekura, “On the Cobordism Classification of Symmetry Protected Topological Phases,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 368, pp. 1121–1173, June 2019

2019
[64]

Gauge noninvariance and parity nonconservation of three-dimensional fermions,

A. N. Redlich, “Gauge noninvariance and parity nonconservation of three-dimensional fermions,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 18, 1984

1984
[65]

Parity violation and gauge noninvariance of the effective gauge field action in three dimensions,

A. N. Redlich, “Parity violation and gauge noninvariance of the effective gauge field action in three dimensions,”Physical Review D, vol. 29, no. 10, p. 2366, 1984

1984
[66]

Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,

J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, “Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,”Physical Review X, vol. 8, p. 031048, July 2018

2018
[67]

Superconductivity in a Chern band: ef- fect of time-reversal-symmetry breaking on superconductivity,

B. E. L¨ uscher and M. H. Fischer, “Superconductivity in a Chern band: ef- fect of time-reversal-symmetry breaking on superconductivity,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2506.16508, June 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

Noncommuting Flux Sectors in a Tabletop Experiment,

A. Kitaev, G. W. Moore, and K. Walker, “Noncommuting Flux Sectors in a Tabletop Experiment,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:0706.3410, June 2007

work page arXiv 2007
[69]

Interaction energy of superconducting vortices,

L. Jacobs and C. Rebbi, “Interaction energy of superconducting vortices,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 19, pp. 4486–4494, May 1979

1979
[70]

Vortex-vortex interaction in bulk superconductors: Ginzburg-landau theory,

A. Chaves, F. M. Peeters, G. A. Farias, and M. V. Miloˇ sevi´ c, “Vortex-vortex interaction in bulk superconductors: Ginzburg-landau theory,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, p. 054516, Feb 2011

2011
[71]

Measurement of the vortex pair interaction potential in a type-ii superconductor,

C.-H. Sow, K. Harada, A. Tonomura, G. Crabtree, and D. G. Grier, “Measurement of the vortex pair interaction potential in a type-ii superconductor,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, pp. 2693–2696, Mar 1998

1998
[72]

Braiding statistics and link invariants of bosonic/fermionic topological quantum matter in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions,

P. Putrov, J. Wang, and S.-T. Yau, “Braiding statistics and link invariants of bosonic/fermionic topological quantum matter in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions,”Annals of Physics, vol. 384, pp. 254–287, Sept. 2017

2017
[73]

Comments on one-form global symmetries and their gauging in 3d and 4d,

P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on one-form global symmetries and their gauging in 3d and 4d,”SciPost Phys., vol. 6, p. 039, 2019. 59

2019
[74]

Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics

T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2306.00912, June 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[75]

Theory of oblique topological insu- lators,

B. Moy, H. Goldman, R. Sohal, and E. Fradkin, “Theory of oblique topological insu- lators,”SciPost Phys., vol. 14, p. 023, 2023

2023
[76]

Fermionic Finite-Group Gauge Theories and Interacting Symmetric/Crystalline Orders via Cobordisms,

M. Guo, K. Ohmori, P. Putrov, Z. Wan, and J. Wang, “Fermionic Finite-Group Gauge Theories and Interacting Symmetric/Crystalline Orders via Cobordisms,”Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 376, no. 2, pp. 1073–1154, 2020

2020
[77]

On the groupsh(π, n), ii: Methods of computation,

S. Eilenberg and S. MacLane, “On the groupsh(π, n), ii: Methods of computation,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 49–139, 1954

1954
[78]

Topological Field Theor y on a Lattice, Discrete Theta-Angles and Conﬁnement,

A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Topological Field Theory on a Lattice, Discrete Theta-Angles and Confinement,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1308.2926, Aug. 2013

work page arXiv 2013
[79]

On 2-group global symmetries and their anoma- lies,

F. Benini, C. C´ ordova, and P.-S. Hsin, “On 2-group global symmetries and their anoma- lies,”Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2019, p. 118, Mar. 2019

2019
[80]

On simply connected, 4-dimensional polyhedra.,

J. Whitehead, “On simply connected, 4-dimensional polyhedra.,”Commentarii math- ematici Helvetici, vol. 22, pp. 48–92, 1949

1949

Showing first 80 references.