pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19215 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Pseudogap and Condensation in Cuprate Superconductors from NMR Shifts

Abigail Lee , Juergen Haase This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords NMR shiftscuprate superconductorspseudogaphyperfine couplingsspin singlet pairingcondensationoptimal Tc
0
0 comments X

The pith

NMR shifts in cuprates separate into A and B components whose coupling sets the pseudogap temperature and guides spin-singlet condensation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that planar copper NMR shifts disentangle into two components based on the symmetry of hyperfine couplings: anisotropic A and isotropic B. Metallic B-spins form above the pseudogap temperature, which is shared with A-spins and measures the A-B coupling strength that suppresses shifts without affecting relaxation. With further doping the pseudogap falls while B-spins increase faster than A-spins; above x=0.20 both become superconducting metals that vanish at Tc. Spin-singlet pairing follows three simple rules involving A and B, and optimal Tc requires a special match between them in systems that still show a pseudogap. A sympathetic reader cares because this supplies a coherent, data-driven picture of the pseudogap and its link to superconductivity across many cuprates using only symmetry arguments and existing NMR measurements.

Core claim

Based only on symmetry of the two Cu hyperfine couplings, an anisotropic A_alpha and isotropic B, the Cu shifts are disentangled, and two different shift components emerge. Upon doping the cuprates, metallic B-spins are created above the pseudogap temperature which is shared with metallic A-spins. Further doping decreases the pseudogap temperature and increases the B-spin, but less so the A-spin. The apparent linear rate of increase in density of states of the B-spin with doping increases nearly threefold above about x=0.20, where the pseudogap has disappeared and A and B turn into superconducting metals, i.e. they disappear rapidly at Tc. The pseudogap temperature is a measure of the A-B, A

What carries the argument

Disentanglement of Cu NMR shifts into anisotropic A_alpha and isotropic B hyperfine components that reveal independent doping behaviors and their coupling.

If this is right

  • Pseudogap temperature falls with doping as B-spins increase faster than A-spins.
  • Above x approximately 0.20 both A and B components become superconducting metals that vanish rapidly at Tc.
  • Optimal Tc requires a special match between A and B and occurs in systems that retain a pseudogap.
  • Highest Tc values are not carried by the shifts but appear in nuclear relaxation rates and charge sharing between planar Cu and O.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If A-B coupling sets the pseudogap scale, modest structural changes that alter this coupling could raise Tc at fixed doping.
  • The three condensation rules might supply a minimal template for pairing in other doped Mott insulators.
  • Combined shift and relaxation measurements could rank candidate cuprate compositions by predicted Tc before synthesis.

Load-bearing premise

The two Cu hyperfine couplings can be cleanly separated into a single anisotropic A_alpha and isotropic B form that remains valid for all cuprates and doping levels.

What would settle it

NMR shift data from one more cuprate compound that cannot be decomposed into consistent A and B components matching the reported doping trends or where pseudogap temperature fails to track the inferred A-B coupling strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19215 by Abigail Lee, Juergen Haase.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The cuprate normal state properties, outside the antiferromagnetic (AF) and supercon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two Cu shift components, from two hyperfine coefficients. (a,b) Sketch of how the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) High-temperature BχB for single-, bi-, and multilayer materials plotted against doping. Inset: High-temperature −A∥χA plotted against doping (note the lack of clear doping dependence). (b) High-temperature BχB plotted against high-temperature −A∥χA for a number of different families. BχB is never smaller than −A∥χA. A few families have been connected with dashed lines as guide to the eye to show their … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature-implicit plot of −A∥χA(T) vs BχB(T). Dashed lines are guides to the eye to indicate the typical slopes according to (3) to (5), see main text for details. At high doping levels, both components are nearly indistinguishable from superconducting metals (the B-component is significantly larger than the A-component), i.e., both show a high-temperature plateau above Tc and rapidly disappear below Tc… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: How the formation of Fermi surface arcs/and or pockets in the underdoped regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: High-temperature spin components and Tc. (a) Given the dependence of Tc and BχB on doping, it is not surprising that the evolution of BχB traces out the superconducting dome. (b) A relationship between Tc and −A∥χA is not readily apparent. [27] relate to the overall change in DOS and the pseudogap [28, 29] remains to be seen. As expected, the high-temperature B-spin draws the superconducting dome when plot… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative isotropic shift suppression squared vs maximum in 1/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The electronic properties of the high-temperature superconducting cuprates are encoded in complex sets of NMR data, but without microscopic theory, reliable NMR phenomenologies are in demand. Early analyses of NMR could only focus on very few materials and discovered spin singlet pairing and the enigmatic pseudogap. However, a coherent phenomenology of shift and relaxation could not be established, as incoming data from other cuprates complicated the picture. Today, due to work of many groups worldwide, planar copper and oxygen NMR data are available for most cuprates. Here, based only on symmetry of the two Cu hyperfine couplings, an anisotropic $A_\alpha$ and isotropic $B$, the Cu shifts are disentangled, and two different shift components emerge. Upon doping the cuprates, metallic B-spins are created above the pseudogap temperature which is shared with metallic A-spins. Further doping decreases the pseudogap temperature and increases the B-spin, but less so the A-spin. The apparent linear rate of increase in density of states of the B-spin with doping increases nearly threefold above about $x=0.20$, where the pseudogap has disappeared and A and B turn into superconducting metals, i.e. they disappear rapidly at $T_\mathrm{c}$. The pseudogap temperature is a measure of the coupling between A and B, which suppresses the shifts but not nuclear relaxation. Spin singlet pairing involves A and B according to three simple rules for condensation which will be discussed. The optimal $T_\mathrm{c}$ demands a special match between A and B and involves systems with a pseudogap. However, the highest $T_\mathrm{c}$ of all cuprates is not encoded in the shift, but rather in nuclear relaxation and charge sharing between planar Cu and O. Relations to other probes are discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to develop a coherent NMR phenomenology for cuprates by disentangling Cu shifts into two components (A-spins and B-spins) using symmetry of anisotropic A_α and isotropic B hyperfine couplings. It identifies the pseudogap temperature as a measure of A-B coupling suppressing shifts (but not relaxation), describes doping evolution of B-spin DOS with a change at x≈0.20, and proposes three rules for spin-singlet condensation where optimal Tc requires a special A-B match in pseudogap systems. Highest Tc relates to relaxation and Cu-O charge sharing.

Significance. This could be significant as it unifies data from many cuprates without microscopic theory, offering simple rules for condensation and explaining pseudogap as inter-component coupling. It gives credit to extensive experimental data. If the separation is robust, it provides a new framework for interpreting NMR in superconductors. However, its impact hinges on whether the hyperfine assumption holds.

major comments (1)
  1. [Shift disentanglement (based on symmetry arguments)] The disentanglement into independent A and B components assumes that the hyperfine form factors A_α (anisotropic) and B (isotropic) are doping-independent and the same for all cuprates. This is load-bearing for identifying metallic B-spins above T*, the suppression by coupling, and the condensation rules. If covalency or transferred hyperfine fields vary with doping (as suggested by changes at x≈0.20), the linear combination used to isolate components would mix A and B, making the claimed distinction an artifact rather than physical. No quantitative check against doping-dependent hyperfine literature is referenced.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to 'three simple rules for condensation which will be discussed' without specifying their location or providing equations; this makes it difficult to evaluate their derivation from the shift data.
  2. Notation for A_α and B should be defined explicitly with reference to standard hyperfine Hamiltonian early in the text for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The disentanglement into independent A and B components assumes that the hyperfine form factors A_α (anisotropic) and B (isotropic) are doping-independent and the same for all cuprates. This is load-bearing for identifying metallic B-spins above T*, the suppression by coupling, and the condensation rules. If covalency or transferred hyperfine fields vary with doping (as suggested by changes at x≈0.20), the linear combination used to isolate components would mix A and B, making the claimed distinction an artifact rather than physical. No quantitative check against doping-dependent hyperfine literature is referenced.

    Authors: The separation into A and B components is grounded in the distinct symmetry properties of the hyperfine couplings (anisotropic on-site A_α versus isotropic transferred B), as originally established by Mila and Rice and validated across multiple cuprate families in the experimental literature. These symmetry-based distinctions remain robust even if modest doping variations in covalency exist, because the extracted components display consistent doping trends and cross-material patterns that would be disrupted by significant mixing. The feature at x≈0.20 reflects a change in the B-spin density of states rather than a hyperfine discontinuity. We nevertheless agree that an explicit discussion of possible doping dependence would strengthen the presentation. In revision we will add references to key studies on the doping evolution of Cu hyperfine constants (showing variations are small relative to the observed shift changes) together with a brief quantitative estimate of the impact any such variation would have on the linear combinations. This directly addresses the concern that the distinction could be an artifact. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; phenomenological analysis under explicit symmetry assumptions

full rationale

The paper starts from an explicit symmetry-based assumption that the two Cu hyperfine couplings can be written as a fixed anisotropic A_α plus isotropic B form factor pair, then uses this to linearly disentangle observed shifts into two components. All subsequent statements (doping evolution of B-spin density of states, T* as a measure of A-B coupling, three condensation rules, optimal-Tc matching condition) are direct interpretations or re-descriptions of the disentangled data sets. No equation or claim is shown to reduce by construction to a parameter fitted from the same shifts, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained once the initial hyperfine-form assumption is granted; it does not loop back to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The analysis rests on the assumption that hyperfine couplings are strictly separable into one anisotropic and one isotropic term for all cuprates; no new particles or forces are introduced, but the two spin components are treated as distinct entities whose coupling is inferred from the data.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Planar copper hyperfine couplings consist of an anisotropic A_alpha term and an isotropic B term whose symmetry allows clean separation of observed shifts.
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the basis for disentangling the Cu shifts.
invented entities (2)
  • A-spins no independent evidence
    purpose: Direction-dependent spin component extracted from anisotropic hyperfine coupling.
    Introduced to explain one part of the disentangled shift data.
  • B-spins no independent evidence
    purpose: Isotropic spin component extracted from isotropic hyperfine coupling.
    Introduced to explain the second part of the disentangled shift data and its doping dependence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1590 out tokens · 42051 ms · 2026-05-10T01:55:45.567041+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    For example, planar O and Y show a superconducting metal for YBa 2Cu3O7 (just beyond optimal doping aty= 0.96)

    NMR. For example, planar O and Y show a superconducting metal for YBa 2Cu3O7 (just beyond optimal doping aty= 0.96). This means that aboveT c the shifts are temperature independent, and the relaxation is proportional to temperature, connected by the Korringa relation. A missing Hebel-Slichter peak just belowT c points to unconventional supercon- ductivity...

  2. [2]

    As expected, the high-temperature B-spin draws the superconducting dome when plotted againstT c, as Fig

    relate to the overall change in DOS and the pseudogap [28, 29] remains to be seen. As expected, the high-temperature B-spin draws the superconducting dome when plotted againstT c, as Fig. 5 shows. The variation in the A-component might be related to family dependent corrugation of the plane [30, 31]. The size of the pseudogap can be determined, from the c...

  3. [3]

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge financial support from Leipzig University, in particular Roger Gl¨ aser, and stimulating discussions with Nabeel Aslam

    to other probes’ findings in greater detail. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We acknowledge financial support from Leipzig University, in particular Roger Gl¨ aser, and stimulating discussions with Nabeel Aslam. Author contributions A.L. performed all data analysis. A.L. and J.H. contributed equally to preparing the manuscript. J.H. had the overall leadership. Competing ...

  4. [4]

    C. P. Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance, third enlarged ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1990)

    1990

  5. [5]

    Korringa, Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonnance line shift in metals, Physica16, 601 (1950)

    J. Korringa, Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonnance line shift in metals, Physica16, 601 (1950)

    1950

  6. [6]

    L. C. Hebel and C. P. Slichter, Nuclear Spin Relaxation in Normal and Superconducting Aluminum, Phys. Rev.113, 1504 (1959). 13

    1959

  7. [7]

    Yosida, Paramagnetic Susceptibility in Superconductors, Phys

    K. Yosida, Paramagnetic Susceptibility in Superconductors, Phys. Rev.110, 769 (1958)

    1958

  8. [8]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible HighT c Superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O System, Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter193, 189 (1986)

    1986

  9. [9]

    R. E. Walstedt, J. W W Warren, R. F. Bell, G. F. Brennert, G. P. Espinosa, R. J. Cava, L. F. Schneemeyer, and J. V. Waszczak, Anisotropic nuclear relaxation in YBa 2Cu3O7, Phys. Rev. B38, 9299 (1988)

    1988

  10. [10]

    M. Mali, D. Brinkmann, L. Pauli, J. Roos, H. Zimmermann, and J. Hulliger, Cu and Y NQR and NMR in the superconductor YBa2Cu3O7-[delta], Phys. Lett. A124, 112 (1987)

    1987

  11. [11]

    Alloul, T

    H. Alloul, T. Ohno, and P. Mendels, 89Y NMR evidence for a Fermi-liquid behavior in YBa2Cu3O6+x, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1700 (1989)

    1989

  12. [12]

    C. P. Slichter, Magnetic Resonance Studies of High Temperature Superconductors, inHand- book of High-Temperature Superconductivity, edited by J. R. Schrieffer and J. S. Brooks (Springer, New York, 2007) pp. 215–256

    2007

  13. [13]

    Haase, C

    J. Haase, C. P. Slichter, and G. V. M. Williams, Evidence for two electronic components in high-temperature superconductivity from NMR, J. Phys. Condens. Matter21, 455702 (2009)

    2009

  14. [14]

    Haase, D

    J. Haase, D. Rybicki, C. P. Slichter, M. Greven, G. Yu, Y. Li, and X. Zhao, Two-component uniform spin susceptibility of superconducting HgBa 2CuO4+δ single crystals measured using 63Cu and 199Hg nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B85, 104517 (2012)

    2012

  15. [15]

    Rybicki, J

    D. Rybicki, J. Kohlrautz, J. Haase, M. Greven, X. Zhao, M. K. Chan, C. J. Dorow, and M. J. Veit, Electronic spin susceptibilities and superconductivity in HgBa 2CuO4+δ from nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B92, 081115(R) (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    Hidden Universal Metal in Cuprate Superconductors

    A. Lee and J. Haase, Hidden universal metal in cuprate superconductors, arXiv: 2604.10133v1 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Haase, M

    J. Haase, M. Jurkutat, and J. Kohlrautz, Contrasting Phenomenology of NMR Shifts in Cuprate Superconductors, Condens. Matter2, 16 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Avramovska, D

    M. Avramovska, D. Pavi´ cevi´ c, and J. Haase, Properties of the Electronic Fluid of Supercon- ducting Cuprates from 63Cu NMR Shift and Relaxation, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.32, 3761 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Avramovska, J

    M. Avramovska, J. Nachtigal, S. Tsankov, and J. Haase, Planar Cu and O NMR and the Pseudogap of Cuprate Superconductors, Condens. Matter7, 21 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Nachtigal, M

    J. Nachtigal, M. Avramovska, A. Erb, D. Pavi´ cevi´ c, R. Guehne, and J. Haase, Temperature- 14 Independent Cuprate Pseudogap from Planar Oxygen NMR, Condens. Matter5, 66 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Bandur, A

    D. Bandur, A. Lee, J. Nachtigal, S. Tsankov, and J. Haase, Tow-Carrier Description of Cuprate Superconductors from NMR, Condens. Matter11, 5 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    R. E. Walstedt,The NMR Probe of High-T c Materials, 1st ed. (Springer, 2007)

    2007

  23. [23]

    Mila and T

    F. Mila and T. M. Rice, Analysis of magnetic resonance experiments in YBa 2Cu3O7, Phys. C: Supercond.157, 561 (1989)

    1989

  24. [24]

    Takigawa, P

    M. Takigawa, P. C. Hammel, R. H. Heffner, Z. Fisk, J. L. Smith, and R. B. Schwarz, Anisotropic Cu Knight shift and magnetic susceptibility in the normal state of YBa 2Cu3O7, Phys. Rev. B39, 300 (1989)

    1989

  25. [25]

    C. H. Pennington, D. J. Durand, C. P. Slichter, J. P. Rice, E. D. Bukowski, and D. M. Ginsberg, Static and dynamic Cu NMR tensors of YBa 2Cu3O7−δ, Phys. Rev. B39, 2902 (1989)

    1989

  26. [26]

    Renold, T

    S. Renold, T. Heine, J. Weber, and P. F. Meier, Nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts and paramagnetic field modifications in La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B67, 024501 (2003)

    2003

  27. [27]

    Pavarini, I

    E. Pavarini, I. Dasgupta, T. Saha-Dasgupta, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Band-structure trend in hole-doped cuprates and correlation withT c,max, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 047003 (2001)

    2001

  28. [28]

    Avramovska, J

    M. Avramovska, J. Nachtigal, and J. Haase, Temperature independent pseudogap from 17O and 89Y NMR and the single component picture, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.35, 1761 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Putzke, S

    C. Putzke, S. Benhabib, W. Tabis, J. Ayres, Z. Wang, L. Malone, S. Licciardello, J. Lu, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, N. E. Hussey, J. R. Cooper, and A. Carrington, Reduced Hall carrier density in the overdoped strange metal regime of cuprate superconductors, Nature Physics 17, 826 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    J. Meng, G. Liu, W. Zhang, L. Zhao, H. Liu, X. Jia, D. Mu, S. Liu, X. Dong, J. Zhang, W. Lu, G. Wang, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Wang, Z. Xu, C. Chen, and X. J. Zhou, Coexistence of Fermi arcs and Fermi pockets in a high-T c copper oxide superconductor, Nature462, 10.1038/nature08521 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08521 2009

  31. [31]

    T. J. Reber, N. C. Plumb, Z. Sun, Y. Cao, Q. Wang, K. McElroy, H. Iwasawa, M. Arita, J. S. Wen, Z. J. Xu, G. Gu, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, Y. Aiura, and D. S. Dessau, The origin and non- quasiparticle nature of Fermi arcs in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, Nature Physics8, 10.1038/nphys2352 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2352 2012

  32. [32]

    Kondo, Y

    T. Kondo, Y. Hamaya, A. D. Palczewski, T. Takeuchi, J. S. Wen, Z. J. Xu, G. Gu, 15 J. Schmalian, and A. Kaminski, Disentangling Cooper-pair formation above the transition temperature from the pseudogap state in the cuprates, Nature Physics7, 10.1038/nphys1851 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys1851 2011

  33. [33]

    Chmaissem, J

    O. Chmaissem, J. D. Jorgensen, S. Short, A. Knizhnik, Y. Eckstein, and H. Shaked, Scaling of transition temperature and CuO 2 plane buckling in a high-temperature superconductor, Nature397, 10.1038/16209 (1999)

    work page doi:10.1038/16209 1999

  34. [34]

    Radaelli, J

    P. Radaelli, J. Wagner, B. Hunter, M. Beno, G. Knapp, J. Jorgensen, and D. Hinks, Structure, doping and superconductivity in HgBa 2CaCu2O6+δ (Tc ≤128 K), Physica C: Superconduc- tivity216, 10.1016/0921-4534(93)90630-9 (1993)

    work page doi:10.1016/0921-4534(93)90630-9 1993

  35. [35]

    J. W. Loram, K. A. Mirza, J. R. Cooper, and J. L. Tallon, Specific heat evidence on the normal state pseudogap, J. Phys. Chem. Solids59, 2091 (1998)

    2091

  36. [36]

    J. L. Tallon and J. G. Storey, Thermodynamics of the pseudogap in cuprates, Front. Phys. 10, 1030616 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Keller, A

    H. Keller, A. Bussmann-Holder, and K. A. M¨ uller, Jahn-Teller physics and high-Tc supercon- ductivity, Materials Today11, 38 (2008)

    2008

  38. [38]

    Bussmann-Holder and H

    A. Bussmann-Holder and H. Keller, Multiband Superconductivity, Polarons, Jahn-Teller Polarons, Heterogeneity, and High-Temperature Superconductivity, Condensed Matter9, 10.3390/condmat9040056 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/condmat9040056 2024

  39. [39]

    Wang, Physical Review B94, 10.1103/phys- revb.94.195105 (2016)

    R. Khasanov, S. Str¨ assle, D. Di Castro, T. Masui, S. Miyasaka, S. Tajima, A. Bussmann- Holder, and H. Keller, Multiple Gap Symmetries for the Order Parameter of Cuprate Su- perconductors from Penetration Depth Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.99.237601 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2007

  40. [40]

    Rybicki, M

    D. Rybicki, M. Jurkutat, S. Reichardt, C. Kapusta, and J. Haase, Perspective on the phase diagram of cuprate high-temperature superconductors, Nat. Commun.7, 11413 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Kowalski, S

    N. Kowalski, S. S. Dash, P. S´ emon, D. S´ en´ echal, and A.-M. Tremblay, Oxygen hole con- tent, charge-transfer gap, covalency, and cuprate superconductivity, PNAS118, e2106476118 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Bacq-Labreuil, B

    B. Bacq-Labreuil, B. Lacasse, A.-M. S. Tremblay, D. S´ en´ echal, and K. Haule, Toward an Ab Initio Theory of High-Temperature Superconductors: A Study of Multilayer Cuprates, Phys. Rev. X15, 021071 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Jurkutat, M

    M. Jurkutat, M. Avramovska, G. V. M. Williams, D. Dernbach, D. Pavi´ cevi´ c, and J. Haase, 16 Phenomenology of 63Cu Nuclear Relaxation in Cuprate Superconductors, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.155, 629 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura, and S. Uchida, Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper oxide superconductors, Nature375, 561 (1995)

    1995

  45. [45]

    H¨ usser, H

    P. H¨ usser, H. U. Suter, E. P. Stoll, and P. F. Meier, First-principles calculations of hyperfine interactions in La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B61, 1567 (2000)

    2000

  46. [46]

    A. A. Gippius, E. V. Antipov, W. Hoffmann, K. L¨ uders, and G. Buntkowsky, Low-frequency spin dynamics as probed by 63Cu and 199Hg NMR in HgBa 2CuO4+δ superconductors with different oxygen content, Phys. Rev. B59, 654 (1999)

    1999

  47. [47]

    Kambe, H

    S. Kambe, H. Yasuoka, A. Hayashi, and Y. Ueda, NMR study of the spin dynamics in Tl2Ba2CuOy (Tc=85 K), Phys. Rev. B47, 2825 (1993)

    1993

  48. [48]

    Fujiwara, Y

    K. Fujiwara, Y. Kitaoka, K. Ishida, K. Asayama, Y. Shimakawa, T. Manako, and Y. Kubo, NMR and NQR studies of superconductivity in heavily doped Tl 2Ba2CuO6+y with a single CuO2 plane, Physica C: Superconductivity184, 207 (1991)

    1991

  49. [49]

    Magishi, Y

    K. Magishi, Y. Kitaoka, G. q. Zheng, K. Asayama, T. Kondo, Y. Shimakawa, T. Manako, and Y. Kubo, Magnetic excitation and superconductivity in overdoped TlSr 2CaCu2O7−δ: A 63Cu NMR study, Phys. Rev. B54, 10131 (1996)

    1996

  50. [50]

    M. Mali, I. Mangelschots, H. Zimmermann, and D. Brinkmann, Nuclear magnetic resonance of plane Cu in paramagnetic YBa 2Cu3O6, Physica C: Superconductivity175, 581 (1991)

    1991

  51. [51]

    Takigawa, A

    M. Takigawa, A. P. Reyes, P. C. Hammel, J. D. Thompson, R. H. Heffner, Z. Fisk, and K. C. Ott, Cu and O NMR studies of the magnetic properties of YBa 2Cu3O6.63 (Tc=62K), Phys. Rev. B43, 247 (1991)

    1991

  52. [52]

    Takigawa, P

    M. Takigawa, P. C. Hammel, R. H. Heffner, and Z. Fisk, Spin susceptibility in superconducting YBa2Cu3O7 from 63Cu Knight shift, Phys. Rev. B39, 7371 (1989)

    1989

  53. [53]

    Walstedt, W

    R. Walstedt, W. Jr, R. Bell, and G. Espinosa, Anisotropic 63Cu nuclear relaxation in mag- netically oriented powdered samples of YBa 2Cu3O7., Phys. Rev. B40, 2572 (1989)

    1989

  54. [54]

    Bankay, M

    M. Bankay, M. Mali, J. Roos, and D. Brinkmann, Single-spin fluid, spin gap, and d-wave pairing in YBa 2Cu4O8: A NMR and NQR study, Phys. Rev. B50, 6416 (1994)

    1994

  55. [55]

    Zimmermann, M

    H. Zimmermann, M. Mali, M. Bankay, and D. Brinkmann, Anisotropy of 63Cu Knight shift and spin-lattice relaxation in YBa 2Cu4O8, Physica C: Supercond.185-189, 1145 (1991)

    1991

  56. [56]

    A. P. Gerashchenko, Y. V. Piskunov, K. Mikhalev, A. Ananyev, K. Okuluva, S. Verkhovskii, 17 A. Yakubovskii, L. Shustov, and A. Trokiner, The 63Cu and 17O NMR studies of spin suscep- tibility in differently doped Tl 2Ba2CaCu2O8−δ compounds, Physica C328, 163 (1999)

    1999

  57. [57]

    Shimizu, S

    S. Shimizu, S. Iwai, S.-i. Tabata, H. Mukuda, Y. Kitaoka, P. M. Shirage, H. Kito, and A. Iyo, Planar CuO2 hole density in high-T ccuprates determined by NMR Knight shift:Cu63 NMR on bilayered Ba2CaCu2O4(F,O)2 and three-layered Ba2Ca2Cu3O6(F,O)2, Phys. Rev. B83, 144523 (2011)

    2011

  58. [58]

    R. E. Walstedt, R. F. Bell, and D. B. Mitzi, Nuclear relaxation behavior of the superconducting cuprates: Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8, Phys. Rev. B44, 7760 (1991)

    1991

  59. [59]

    Piskunov, K

    Y. Piskunov, K. Mikhalev, Y. Zhdanov, A. Gerashenko, S. Verkhovskii, K. Okulova, E. Medvedev, A. Yakubovskii, L. Shustov, P. Bellot, and A. Trokiner, Influence of the doping level on the charge distribution among the inequivalent CuO 2 layers in Tl 2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10−δ - a NMR study, Physica C: Superconductivity300, 225 (1998)

    1998

  60. [60]

    Z. Han, R. Dupree, R. Liu, and P. Edwards, 63Cu NMR shift and relaxation behavior in Tl2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10−δ (Tc = 125 K), Physica C: Superconductivity226, 106 (1994)

    1994

  61. [61]

    Zheng, Y

    G.-q. Zheng, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, K. Hamada, H. Yamauchi, and S. Tanaka, NMR study of local hole distribution, spin fluctuation and superconductivity in Tl 2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10, Physica C: Superconductivity260, 197 (1996)

    1996

  62. [62]

    Julien, P

    M.-H. Julien, P. Carretta, M. Horvati´ c, C. Berthier, Y. Berthier, P. S´ egransan, A. Carrington, and D. Colson, Spin Gap in HgBa 2Ca2Cu3O8+δ Single Crystals from 63Cu NMR, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4238 (1996)

    1996

  63. [63]

    Magishi, Y

    K. Magishi, Y. Kitaoka, G.-q. Zheng, K. Asayama, K. Tokiwa, A. Iyo, and H. Ihara, Spin Correlation in High-T c Cuprate HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ withT c = 133 K An Origin ofT c-Enhancement Evidenced by 63Cu-NMR Study, J. Phys. Soc. Japan64, 4561 (1995)

    1995

  64. [64]

    Kotegawa, Y

    H. Kotegawa, Y. Tokunaga, Y. Araki, G.-q. Zheng, Y. Kitaoka, K. Tokiwa, K. Ito, T. Watan- abe, a. Iyo, Y. Tanaka, and H. Ihara, Coexistence of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in multilayered high-Tc superconductor HgBa 2Ca4Cu5Oy: Cu-NMR study, Phys. Rev. B69, 014501 (2004). 18 Appendix A: Decomposition of the two spin components For the analysis,...

    2004