pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10133 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Hidden Universal Metal in Cuprate Superconductors

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords cuprate superconductorsnuclear magnetic relaxationuniversal metalcritical temperaturestrange metalpseudogapdoping dependencespin fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A universal metal sets the critical temperature in all cuprate superconductors via a fixed nuclear relaxation ratio.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compiles published nuclear relaxation data for copper and oxygen nuclei across many cuprate families to extract a shared underlying metallic state. This state is defined by a constant product of the perpendicular copper relaxation rate and the superconducting transition temperature, directly tying Tc to copper-site spin fluctuations. Above Tc the relaxation crosses over into a strange-metal regime that lags behind the universal baseline, while oxygen relaxation tracks the same metal except where a doping-dependent pseudogap appears in underdoped samples. The doping evolution of the copper relaxation anisotropy, ranging from roughly 3.6 down to 1, appears to limit the highest attainable Tc and implies at least two distinct relaxation channels. If the pattern holds, it supplies a compact organizing rule for the cuprate phase diagram.

Core claim

Based on planar Cu and O relaxation data available in the literature, a universal metal exists in all cuprate superconductors and is characterized by 1/{^{63}T}_{1⊥} Tc ≈ 25/Ks, so that Tc is directly proportional to the Cu nuclear relaxation rate. Above Tc this universal metal crosses over into a strange-metal regime where relaxation increasingly lags. The same universal behavior is tied to metallic planar O relaxation, which deviates only at lower energies in underdoped materials through a doping-dependent but temperature-independent pseudogap. Cu relaxation anisotropy is doping-dependent and varies between about 3.6 and 1; this variation sets the maximum Tc of the family and indicates the

What carries the argument

The universal metal defined by the fixed ratio 1/{^{63}T}_{1⊥} Tc ≈ 25/Ks, which directly links the copper nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate to the superconducting transition temperature and organizes the temperature and doping dependence of both Cu and O relaxation across materials.

If this is right

  • Tc scales directly with the Cu relaxation rate of the universal metal for every cuprate family.
  • The strange-metal regime is a temperature-driven crossover away from this universal metallic state.
  • Planar oxygen relaxation follows the universal metal except where a temperature-independent pseudogap opens in underdoped samples.
  • Doping-tuned anisotropy of the Cu relaxation sets the highest possible Tc and requires at least two distinct relaxation components.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Any microscopic theory must account for why this particular relaxation ratio remains constant across chemically distinct cuprates.
  • The required two relaxation channels may reflect separate electronic degrees of freedom or momentum-space regions contributing to the spin response.
  • The phenomenology could be used to screen candidate materials by checking whether their relaxation ratio approaches the same universal value.
  • Systematic re-measurement of the same compounds under controlled conditions would test whether the literature data truly collapse onto one line.

Load-bearing premise

Relaxation data taken on different cuprate samples in the literature can be compared directly without being dominated by variations in sample quality, measurement conditions, or material-specific effects.

What would settle it

A measurement on any additional cuprate compound showing that the product of the perpendicular copper relaxation rate and Tc differs substantially from 25/Ks, or that the anisotropy fails to track the maximum Tc, would refute the claimed universality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10133 by Abigail Lee, Juergen Haase.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Nuclear relaxation rates 1/T1⊥ of planar Cu as a function of doping in the cuprates. For a simple metal, 1/T1 = κT (in this case, κ = 25/Ks), and the relaxation rate is determined by temperature. This is the reason why we see the similarities to the cuprate phase diagram. As the temperature is lowered, a universal metal behavior sets in at the red triangles (above which strange metal behavior is observed),… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Nuclear relaxation in a variety of cuprates. (a) 1/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Main panel: 1/ 63T1⊥ first multiplied by a scaling factor ∼1 (see Appendix for actual numbers) to normalize to a maximum 1/T1⊥T = 25/Ks (dashed grey line) and then shifted on the temperature axis such that the quoted Tc for each material is aligned to the dashed black line. Above Tc, materials follow the metal-like line for a doping-dependent finite window in temperature before bending away. Note that give… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quoted value of Tc plotted against the temperature-independent relaxation anisotropy for a variety of materials and doping levels. Optimally doped materials within a given family are marked with triangles instead of circles. Note that members of the YBa2Cu3O6+y family show larger relaxation anisotropies compared to other materials at similar doping levels, including the optimally doped compound. For a list… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nuclear relaxation is a powerful probe of temperature dependent electronic excitations in superconducting metals. Their emergence from a condensed state near the critical temperature, $T_\mathrm{c}$, is of particular interest. In cuprate superconductors, the behavior is still not understood. Here, based on planar Cu and O relaxation data available in the literature, a simple phenomenology is developed. At its core is a universal metal, characterized by $1/{^{63}T}_{1\perp} T_\mathrm{c} \approx 25$/Ks, found in all materials, i.e. $T_\mathrm{c}$ is directly related to the Cu nuclear relaxation rate. Above $T_\mathrm{c}$, as a function of temperature, this universal metal crosses over into a strange metal regime where relaxation increasingly lags behind that of the universal metal. The latter is also tied to the metallic planar O relaxation, which only deviates from it at lower energies in underdoped materials with a doping dependent, but temperature independent pseudogap described earlier. Planar O relaxation has the expected fixed anisotropy, but for Cu it is doping dependent and varies between about 3.6 for lower and 1 for high doping levels. It is this doping-related anisotropy that sets the maximum critical temperature of the family and in that sense is tied to the universal metal. This likely requires two components of relaxation. The new phenomenology will be discussed and should give a better foundation for the understanding of the phase diagram of the cuprates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a phenomenology for cuprate superconductors based on reanalysis of published planar Cu and O nuclear relaxation (1/T1) data. Its central claim is the existence of a 'universal metal' characterized by the approximate constant 1/{^{63}T}_{1⊥} T_c ≈ 25/Ks across all materials, implying T_c is directly tied to the Cu relaxation rate. Above T_c this state crosses over to a strange-metal regime; planar O relaxation follows the universal metal except at low energies in underdoped samples where a temperature-independent but doping-dependent pseudogap appears. Cu relaxation anisotropy is doping-dependent (varying from ~3.6 at low doping to ~1 at high doping) and is argued to set the maximum T_c of each family, suggesting two relaxation components.

Significance. If the claimed constancy survives scrutiny, the work supplies a compact, falsifiable organizing principle for the cuprate phase diagram that directly links T_c to a normal-state relaxation scale. The paper's strength is its distillation of an approximate material-independent product from existing literature, which could serve as a benchmark for microscopic theories. Credit is due for highlighting the doping evolution of Cu anisotropy and its possible connection to optimal T_c, even though the analysis rests entirely on reprocessed published values rather than new measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the definition of the universal metal: the product 1/{^{63}T}_{1⊥} T_c is used both to define the constant (~25/Ks) and to assert that 'T_c is directly related to the Cu nuclear relaxation rate.' This relation holds by construction once the constant is chosen; the non-trivial claim is therefore the material independence of the product, which requires explicit demonstration that the absolute scales of the compiled 1/T1⊥ datasets are commensurate.
  2. [Phenomenology / data compilation] Compilation and comparison of literature data (throughout the phenomenology section): the universality rests on the assumption that reported planar-Cu 1/T1⊥ values from different cuprate families, dopings, and experimental conditions share a common absolute scale. No quantitative discussion is given of possible systematic offsets arising from sample quality (oxygen stoichiometry, disorder), NMR frequency/field orientation, or material-specific hyperfine form factors, even though the paper itself notes doping-dependent anisotropy changes. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.
  3. [Anisotropy discussion] Anisotropy and maximum-T_c link (discussion of Cu anisotropy): the manuscript states that the doping-dependent Cu anisotropy (3.6 to 1) 'sets the maximum critical temperature of the family' and is 'tied to the universal metal,' yet no explicit relation or plot quantifies how the anisotropy variation produces the observed optimal T_c values across families. Without this step the connection remains qualitative and does not yet support the two-component relaxation interpretation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / results] The numerical value 25/Ks is given without accompanying uncertainty or range of observed variation across the data points; adding a table or figure showing individual 1/T1⊥ T_c products with error bars would strengthen the presentation.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the perpendicular relaxation rate (^{63}T_{1⊥}) and the distinction between Cu and O channels should be defined on first use for readers outside the NMR community.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for recognizing the potential of our phenomenology as an organizing principle for the cuprate phase diagram. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and a new figure as appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the definition of the universal metal: the product 1/{^{63}T}_{1⊥} T_c is used both to define the constant (~25/Ks) and to assert that 'T_c is directly related to the Cu nuclear relaxation rate.' This relation holds by construction once the constant is chosen; the non-trivial claim is therefore the material independence of the product, which requires explicit demonstration that the absolute scales of the compiled 1/T1⊥ datasets are commensurate.

    Authors: We agree that the material independence of the product is the central non-trivial result. The manuscript demonstrates this through direct compilation of published 1/T1⊥ values across multiple families and dopings, yielding an approximately constant product near 25/Ks. To address commensurability of absolute scales, the revised version adds a dedicated paragraph on data sources, experimental normalization, and hyperfine couplings, together with a table of the individual values and Tc used for each material. This allows explicit verification that the scales align sufficiently for the observed constancy. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Phenomenology / data compilation] Compilation and comparison of literature data (throughout the phenomenology section): the universality rests on the assumption that reported planar-Cu 1/T1⊥ values from different cuprate families, dopings, and experimental conditions share a common absolute scale. No quantitative discussion is given of possible systematic offsets arising from sample quality (oxygen stoichiometry, disorder), NMR frequency/field orientation, or material-specific hyperfine form factors, even though the paper itself notes doping-dependent anisotropy changes. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We accept that a more quantitative treatment of possible systematics strengthens the presentation. The revised manuscript includes a new subsection on data compilation that discusses sample quality, disorder, field orientation, and hyperfine form factors, with estimates of their likely impact. While the published nature of the data limits exhaustive quantification, the consistency of the product across independent studies from different groups provides empirical support. The doping-dependent anisotropy is already incorporated by restricting the analysis to the perpendicular component. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Anisotropy discussion] Anisotropy and maximum-T_c link (discussion of Cu anisotropy): the manuscript states that the doping-dependent Cu anisotropy (3.6 to 1) 'sets the maximum critical temperature of the family' and is 'tied to the universal metal,' yet no explicit relation or plot quantifies how the anisotropy variation produces the observed optimal T_c values across families. Without this step the connection remains qualitative and does not yet support the two-component relaxation interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the link was presented qualitatively in the original text. The revised manuscript adds an explicit plot of optimal Tc versus Cu anisotropy ratio for the principal families, together with a simple phenomenological expression relating the anisotropy to the effective relaxation scale of the universal metal. This quantifies how the doping evolution of the anisotropy modulates the maximum Tc and supports the two-component interpretation by separating a doping-independent contribution from a doping-dependent one. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper develops a phenomenology from compiled literature NMR relaxation data, identifying an approximate constancy in the product 1/{^{63}T}_{1⊥} T_c ≈ 25/Ks across materials as the core characterization of a 'universal metal.' This empirical observation directly implies the stated relation between T_c and the relaxation rate as an interpretive consequence rather than a self-referential or fitted result. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the paper's own definitions, prior self-citations, or ansatzes; the central claim rests on external data comparability, which is a matter of evidence strength rather than logical circularity. The 'described earlier' reference to the pseudogap is peripheral and does not underpin the universal-metal claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim depends on treating literature relaxation rates as directly comparable and on introducing the universal metal as a descriptive entity without independent microscopic support.

free parameters (1)
  • universal constant 1/^{63}T_{1⊥} Tc = 25/Ks
    The value ≈25/Ks is presented as approximately constant across materials and is the defining feature of the universal metal.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nuclear relaxation rates from planar Cu and O sites can be compared across different cuprate compounds to reveal universal behavior.
    This underpins the development of the simple phenomenology from heterogeneous literature data.
invented entities (1)
  • universal metal no independent evidence
    purpose: To characterize the common relaxation regime tied to Tc in all cuprates.
    Introduced as a new descriptive state based on the observed constant; no independent falsifiable prediction is provided beyond the data used to define it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1402 out tokens · 40761 ms · 2026-05-10T15:53:21.853638+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pseudogap and Condensation in Cuprate Superconductors from NMR Shifts

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NMR shift disentanglement in cuprates reveals A and B spin components whose coupling defines the pseudogap temperature and whose balance sets optimal superconducting Tc.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C. P. Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance, third enlarged ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1990)

  2. [2]

    Heitler and E

    W. Heitler and E. Teller, Time Effects in the Magnetic Cooling Method-I, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.155, 629 (1936)

  3. [3]

    Korringa, Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonnance line shift in metals, Physica16, 601 (1950)

    J. Korringa, Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonnance line shift in metals, Physica16, 601 (1950)

  4. [4]

    L. C. Hebel and C. P. Slichter, Nuclear Spin Relaxation in Normal and Superconducting Aluminum, Phys. Rev.113, 1504 (1959)

  5. [5]

    C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phenomenology of the normal state of Cu-O high-temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1996 (1989)

  6. [6]

    B. J. Ramshaw, S. E. Sebastian, R. D. McDonald, J. Day, B. S. Tan, Z. Zhu, J. B. Betts, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, and N. Harrison, Quasiparticle mass enhancement ap- proaching optimal doping in a high-T c superconductor, Science348, 317 (2015). 10

  7. [7]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible HighT c Superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O System, Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter193, 189 (1986)

  8. [8]

    Suter, M

    A. Suter, M. Mali, J. Roos, and D. Brinkmann, Charge degree of freedom and the single-spin fluid model in YBa 2Cu4O8, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4938 (2000)

  9. [9]

    R. E. Walstedt, J. W W Warren, R. F. Bell, G. F. Brennert, G. P. Espinosa, R. J. Cava, L. F. Schneemeyer, and J. V. Waszczak, Anisotropic nuclear relaxation in YBa 2Cu3O7, Phys. Rev. B38, 9299 (1988)

  10. [10]

    Takigawa, P

    M. Takigawa, P. C. Hammel, R. H. Heffner, and Z. Fisk, Spin susceptibility in superconducting YBa2Cu3O7 from 63Cu Knight shift, Phys. Rev. B39, 7371 (1989)

  11. [11]

    C. H. Pennington, D. J. Durand, C. P. Slichter, J. P. Rice, E. D. Bukowski, and D. M. Ginsberg, Static and dynamic Cu NMR tensors of YBa 2Cu3O7−δ, Phys. Rev. B39, 2902 (1989)

  12. [12]

    Zimmermann, M

    H. Zimmermann, M. Mali, D. Brinkmann, J. Karpinski, E. Kaldis, and S. Rusiecki, Copper NQR and NMR in the superconductor YBa 2Cu4O8+x, Phys. C Supercond.159, 681 (1989)

  13. [13]

    Mila and T

    F. Mila and T. M. Rice, Analysis of magnetic resonance experiments in YBa 2Cu3O7, Phys. C: Supercond.157, 561 (1989)

  14. [14]

    Bandur, A

    D. Bandur, A. Lee, J. Nachtigal, S. Tsankov, and J. Haase, Tow-Carrier Description of Cuprate Superconductors from NMR, Condens. Matter11, 5 (2026)

  15. [15]

    Y. Dai, A. Kreisel, and M. Andersen B, Existence of Hebel-Slichter peak in unconventional kagome superconductors, Phys. Rev. B110, 144516 (2024)

  16. [16]

    Haase, C

    J. Haase, C. P. Slichter, and G. V. M. Williams, Evidence for two electronic components in high-temperature superconductivity from NMR, J. Phys. Condens. Matter21, 455702 (2009)

  17. [17]

    Meissner, S

    T. Meissner, S. K. Goh, J. Haase, G. V. M. Williams, and P. B. Littlewood, High-pressure spin shifts in the pseudogap regime of superconducting YBa2 Cu4O8 as revealed by 17O NMR, Phys. Rev. B83, 220517(R) (2011)

  18. [18]

    Haase, D

    J. Haase, D. Rybicki, C. P. Slichter, M. Greven, G. Yu, Y. Li, and X. Zhao, Two-component uniform spin susceptibility of superconducting HgBa 2CuO4+δ single crystals measured using 63Cu and 199Hg nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B85, 104517 (2012)

  19. [19]

    Rybicki, J

    D. Rybicki, J. Kohlrautz, J. Haase, M. Greven, X. Zhao, M. K. Chan, C. J. Dorow, and M. J. Veit, Electronic spin susceptibilities and superconductivity in HgBa 2CuO4+δ from nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B92, 081115(R) (2015). 11

  20. [20]

    Haase, M

    J. Haase, M. Jurkutat, and J. Kohlrautz, Contrasting Phenomenology of NMR Shifts in Cuprate Superconductors, Condens. Matter2, 16 (2017)

  21. [21]

    Jurkutat, M

    M. Jurkutat, M. Avramovska, G. V. M. Williams, D. Dernbach, D. Pavi´ cevi´ c, and J. Haase, Phenomenology of 63Cu Nuclear Relaxation in Cuprate Superconductors, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.155, 629 (2019)

  22. [22]

    Nachtigal, M

    J. Nachtigal, M. Avramovska, A. Erb, D. Pavi´ cevi´ c, R. Guehne, and J. Haase, Temperature- Independent Cuprate Pseudogap from Planar Oxygen NMR, Condens. Matter5, 66 (2020)

  23. [23]

    Avramovska, J

    M. Avramovska, J. Nachtigal, S. Tsankov, and J. Haase, Planar Cu and O NMR and the Pseudogap of Cuprate Superconductors, Condens. Matter7, 21 (2022)

  24. [24]

    Avramovska, J

    M. Avramovska, J. Nachtigal, and J. Haase, Temperature independent pseudogap from 17O and 89Y NMR and the single component picture, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.35, 1761 (2022)

  25. [25]

    J. W. Loram, K. A. Mirza, J. R. Cooper, and J. L. Tallon, Specific heat evidence on the normal state pseudogap, J. Phys. Chem. Solids59, 2091 (1998)

  26. [26]

    J. L. Tallon and J. G. Storey, Thermodynamics of the pseudogap in cuprates, Front. Phys. 10, 1030616 (2022)

  27. [27]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura, and S. Uchida, Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper oxide superconductors, Nature375, 561 (1995)

  28. [28]

    O. P. Sushkov, La 2−xBaxCuO4 (x=1/8)µSR data are inconsistent with spin stripe but con- sistent with spin spiral, arXiv2602.07766v1 (2026)

  29. [29]

    Jurkutat, D

    M. Jurkutat, D. Rybicki, O. P. Sushkov, G. V. M. Williams, A. Erb, and J. Haase, Distribution of electrons and holes in cuprate superconductors as determined from 17O and 63Cu nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B90, 140504(R) (2014)

  30. [30]

    Rybicki, M

    D. Rybicki, M. Jurkutat, S. Reichardt, C. Kapusta, and J. Haase, Perspective on the phase diagram of cuprate high-temperature superconductors, Nat. Commun.7, 11413 (2016)

  31. [31]

    Jurkutat, C

    M. Jurkutat, C. Kattinger, S. Tsankov, R. Reznicek, A. Erb, and J. Haase, How pressure enhances the critical temperature for high temperature superconductivity in YBa 2Cu3O6+y, PNAS120, e2215458120 (2023)

  32. [32]

    T. Sato, Y. Naitoh, T. Kamiyama, T. Takahashi, T. Yokoya, K. Yamada, Y. Endoh, and K. Kadowaki, Small and large pseudogaps in high-T c superconductors observed by ultrahigh- resolution photoemission spectroscopy, Physica C: Superconductivity341-348, 815 (2000)

  33. [33]

    Rullier-Albenque, H

    F. Rullier-Albenque, H. Alloul, and G. Rikken, High-field studies of superconducting fluctua- 12 tions in high-T c cuprates: Evidence for a small gap distinct from the large pseudogap, Phys. Rev. B84, 014522 (2011)

  34. [34]

    A. A. Gippius, E. V. Antipov, W. Hoffmann, K. L¨ uders, and G. Buntkowsky, Low-frequency spin dynamics as probed by 63Cu and 199Hg NMR in HgBa 2CuO4+δ superconductors with different oxygen content, Phys. Rev. B59, 654 (1999)

  35. [35]

    Bobroff, H

    J. Bobroff, H. Alloul, P. Mendels, V. Viallet, J. F. Marucco, and D. Colson,17O NMR Evidence for a Pseudogap in the Monolayer HgBa 2CuO4+δ, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3757 (1997)

  36. [36]

    Kambe, H

    S. Kambe, H. Yasuoka, A. Hayashi, and Y. Ueda, NMR study of the spin dynamics in Tl2Ba2CuOy (Tc=85 K), Phys. Rev. B47, 2825 (1993)

  37. [37]

    Fujiwara, Y

    K. Fujiwara, Y. Kitaoka, K. Ishida, K. Asayama, Y. Shimakawa, T. Manako, and Y. Kubo, NMR and NQR studies of superconductivity in heavily doped Tl 2Ba2CuO6+y with a single CuO2 plane, Physica C: Superconductivity184, 207 (1991)

  38. [38]

    Kambe, Y

    S. Kambe, Y. Yoshinari, H. Yasuoka, A. Hayashi, and Y. Ueda, 17O, 63Cu and 205Tl NMR study of over-doped Tl 2Ba2CuOy, Phys. C: Supercond.185, 1181 (1991)

  39. [39]

    Magishi, Y

    K. Magishi, Y. Kitaoka, G. q. Zheng, K. Asayama, T. Kondo, Y. Shimakawa, T. Manako, and Y. Kubo, Magnetic excitation and superconductivity in overdoped TlSr 2CaCu2O7−δ: A 63Cu NMR study, Phys. Rev. B54, 10131 (1996)

  40. [40]

    Takigawa, A

    M. Takigawa, A. P. Reyes, P. C. Hammel, J. D. Thompson, R. H. Heffner, Z. Fisk, and K. C. Ott, Cu and O NMR studies of the magnetic properties of YBa 2Cu3O6.63 (Tc=62K), Phys. Rev. B43, 247 (1991)

  41. [41]

    Auler, M

    T. Auler, M. Horvati´ c, J. A. Gillet, C. Berthier, Y. Berthier, P. Carretta, Y. Kitaoka, P. S´ egransan, and J. Y. Henry, Normal state spin susceptibility in YBa2Cu3O6.92 single crystal from 63Cu and 89Y nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. C: Supercond.313, 255 (1999)

  42. [42]

    Yoshinari, H

    Y. Yoshinari, H. Yasuoka, and Y. Ueda, Nuclear Spin Relaxation at Planar Copper and Oxygen Sites in YBa 2Cu3O6.96, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.61, 770 (1992)

  43. [43]

    Walstedt, W

    R. Walstedt, W. Jr, R. Bell, and G. Espinosa, Anisotropic 63Cu nuclear relaxation in mag- netically oriented powdered samples of YBa 2Cu3O7., Phys. Rev. B40, 2572 (1989)

  44. [44]

    Kitaoka, K

    Y. Kitaoka, K. Ishida, F. Fujiwara, T. Kondo, K. Asayama, M. Horvatic, Y. Berthier, P. Bu- taud, P. Segransan, C. Berthier, H. Katayama-Yoshida, Y. Okabe, and T. Takahashi,Strong Correlation and Superconductivity, edited by K. A. M¨ uller, M. Cardona, P. Fulde, K. Von Kl- itzing, H.-J. Queisser, H. K. V. Lotsch, H. Fukuyama, S. Maekawa, and A. P. Malozemo...

  45. [45]

    Zimmermann, M

    H. Zimmermann, M. Mali, M. Bankay, and D. Brinkmann, Anisotropy of 63Cu Knight shift and spin-lattice relaxation in YBa 2Cu4O8, Physica C: Supercond.185-189, 1145 (1991)

  46. [46]

    Bankay, M

    M. Bankay, M. Mali, J. Roos, and D. Brinkmann, Single-spin fluid, spin gap, and d-wave pairing in YBa 2Cu4O8: A NMR and NQR study, Phys. Rev. B50, 6416 (1994)

  47. [47]

    A. P. Gerashchenko, Y. V. Piskunov, K. Mikhalev, A. Ananyev, K. Okuluva, S. Verkhovskii, A. Yakubovskii, L. Shustov, and A. Trokiner, The 63Cu and 17O NMR studies of spin suscep- tibility in differently doped Tl 2Ba2CaCu2O8−δ compounds, Physica C328, 163 (1999)

  48. [48]

    Y. Itoh, T. Machi, and A. Yamamoto, Ultraslow fluctuations in the pseudogap states of, Phys. Rev. B95, 094501 (2017)

  49. [49]

    Zheng, Y

    G.-q. Zheng, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, K. Hamada, H. Yamauchi, and S. Tanaka, NMR study of local hole distribution, spin fluctuation and superconductivity in Tl 2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10, Physica C: Superconductivity260, 197 (1996)

  50. [50]

    Magishi, Y

    K. Magishi, Y. Kitaoka, G.-q. Zheng, K. Asayama, K. Tokiwa, A. Iyo, and H. Ihara, Spin Correlation in High-T c Cuprate HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ withT c = 133 K An Origin ofT c-Enhancement Evidenced by 63Cu-NMR Study, J. Phys. Soc. Japan64, 4561 (1995). 14 Appendix A: Literature Data Table I contains the references for all literature data used in this analysis. The...