pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19794 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.CE· cs.LG

Handbook of Rough Set Extensions and Uncertainty Models

Takaaki Fujita , Florentin Smarandache This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.CEcs.LG
keywords rough set theorygranulation mechanismsuncertainty semanticslower and upper approximationsboundary regionsfuzzy rough setsneutrosophic rough setsdecision support
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rough set models and extensions are surveyed as a map organized by granulation mechanisms and uncertainty semantics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The book treats rough set theory as a collection of models for uncertainty that approximate target concepts using lower and upper sets induced by indiscernibility or granulation relations in data tables. It organizes representative variants along two axes to show how each choice shapes approximations and boundary regions: the first axis covers granulation mechanisms such as equivalence-based, tolerance-based, covering-based, neighborhood-based, and probabilistic approaches, while the second covers uncertainty semantics including crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, and plithogenic settings. A sympathetic reader would value this structure because it clarifies modeling intent for applications like classification and decision support without presenting a single algorithmic pipeline. Small examples throughout illustrate typical use cases and the effects of different modeling choices. Feature reduction and rule induction appear only as motivating applications and entry points rather than central topics.

Core claim

Rough set theory models uncertainty by approximating target concepts through lower and upper sets induced by indiscernibility or more general granulation relations. The handbook surveys the main paradigms by organizing representative variants according to the underlying granulation mechanism and the uncertainty semantics attached to data and relations, explaining how each choice changes the form of approximations and the interpretation of boundary regions.

What carries the argument

The two-axis classification by granulation mechanism (equivalence-based, tolerance-based, covering-based, neighborhood-based, probabilistic) and uncertainty semantics (crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, plithogenic), which positions models to show changes in approximations and boundaries.

If this is right

  • Each granulation mechanism produces a distinct form of lower and upper approximations.
  • Different uncertainty semantics change how boundary regions are interpreted.
  • The organization supports selection of models for classification and decision support tasks.
  • Feature reduction and rule induction serve as entry points to the wider research landscape rather than primary goals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The map could guide selection of a rough set variant by matching data characteristics to specific granulation and semantics choices.
  • Future extensions might test whether new uncertainty models fit cleanly into the existing two axes or require adjustments.
  • Similar two-axis organization could be applied to other uncertainty-handling frameworks to compare modeling intents across theories.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen representative variants cover the main rough set paradigms without major omissions and the two-axis grouping by granulation and uncertainty semantics creates a useful, non-overlapping classification.

What would settle it

Discovery of a major rough set variant that fits none of the listed granulation mechanisms or uncertainty semantics without forcing overlap or requiring a new axis would show the map is incomplete.

read the original abstract

Rough set theory models uncertainty by approximating target concepts through lower and upper sets induced by indiscernibility, or more generally, by granulation relations in data tables. This perspective captures vagueness caused by limited observational resolution and supports set-theoretic reasoning about what can be determined with certainty and what remains only possible. This book is written as a map of models. Rather than developing a single algorithmic pipeline in depth, it provides a systematic survey of the main rough set paradigms and their extension routes. More specifically, representative variants are organized according to (i) the underlying granulation mechanism, such as equivalence-based, tolerance-based, covering-based, neighborhood-based, and probabilistic approximations, and (ii) the uncertainty semantics attached to data and relations, such as crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, and plithogenic settings. The book also explains how each choice changes the form of approximations and the interpretation of boundary regions. Throughout the book, small illustrative examples are used to clarify modeling intent and typical use cases in classification and decision support. Finally, an important clarification of scope should be noted. Since the main purpose of this book is to provide a map of models, the Abstract and Introduction should not lead readers to expect that feature reduction and rule induction are primary objectives. Although these topics are central in the rough set literature, they are treated here mainly as motivating applications and as entry points to the broader research landscape. The principal aim of the book is to survey and position rough set models and their extensions in a systematic and coherent manner.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a handbook surveying rough set theory and its extensions for modeling uncertainty. It organizes representative variants along two axes: (i) granulation mechanisms including equivalence-based, tolerance-based, covering-based, neighborhood-based, and probabilistic approximations, and (ii) uncertainty semantics such as crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, and plithogenic settings. The work uses small illustrative examples to show how each choice affects the form of approximations and boundary regions, while explicitly clarifying that its primary aim is to provide a systematic map of models rather than developing feature reduction or rule induction algorithms in depth.

Significance. If the two-axis organization proves coherent and the selected variants adequately representative without major omissions or overlaps, the handbook would offer a useful reference framework for the rough set and uncertainty modeling community in AI. By focusing on modeling intent and interpretation rather than algorithms, it could help researchers select appropriate paradigms for classification and decision support tasks. The scope disclaimer is a strength that aligns reader expectations with the descriptive nature of the contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and Introduction: The central claim that the two-axis organization yields a 'systematic and coherent' map depends on non-overlapping coverage. The manuscript should add an explicit discussion (perhaps as a new subsection) justifying why categories such as probabilistic granulation and neutrosophic semantics do not overlap in practice and how boundary cases are assigned.
minor comments (2)
  1. Throughout: Ensure that each illustrative example is accompanied by a clear statement of the granulation relation and uncertainty semantics used, so readers can directly map the example to the two axes.
  2. References: Verify that all cited foundational works on rough set extensions are accurately summarized to prevent any misrepresentation of established results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment is addressed point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and Introduction: The central claim that the two-axis organization yields a 'systematic and coherent' map depends on non-overlapping coverage. The manuscript should add an explicit discussion (perhaps as a new subsection) justifying why categories such as probabilistic granulation and neutrosophic semantics do not overlap in practice and how boundary cases are assigned.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification of the orthogonality between the two axes would strengthen the claim of coherence. The granulation axis concerns the structural mechanism for forming approximations (equivalence relations, tolerance relations, coverings, neighborhoods, or probabilistic measures), while the uncertainty semantics axis concerns the value domain and logical framework applied to membership or truth degrees (crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, or plithogenic). These dimensions are independent by construction: any granulation type can be paired with any semantics, and the taxonomy assigns a model to one cell based on its dominant approximation operator and value representation. Boundary cases (e.g., a neutrosophic model that incorporates probabilistic granule weights) are classified according to the primary granulation mechanism, with cross-references provided to related entries. We will add a new subsection in the Introduction, titled 'Rationale for the Two-Axis Organization,' that formalizes this separation, illustrates non-overlap with examples, and specifies the assignment rule for hybrids. This addition will be limited to clarifying the existing framework and will not expand the scope or introduce new models. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: descriptive survey with no derivations or load-bearing self-references

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly framed as a handbook and systematic survey that compiles and organizes existing rough set paradigms by granulation mechanism and uncertainty semantics. No original derivations, equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or algorithmic pipelines are introduced; the text disclaims primary focus on feature reduction or rule induction and treats them only as motivating context. The central claim reduces to whether the chosen two-axis classification and illustrative examples achieve coherence, which is an organizational judgment independent of any self-citation chain or definitional reduction. All referenced models are drawn from prior literature without the present work invoking uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from the authors' own prior publications as load-bearing premises. Consequently the derivation chain is empty and the content is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey handbook, the central claim rests on the completeness of the literature compilation and the utility of the proposed organization; it introduces no free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities beyond standard rough set concepts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1054 out tokens · 51471 ms · 2026-05-10T20:13:44.716354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Set theory: The third millennium edition, revised and expanded

    Thomas Jech. Set theory: The third millennium edition, revised and expanded . Springer, 2003

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Fuzzy sets

    Lotfi A Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and control , 8(3):338–353, 1965

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    Circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Krassimir T Atanassov. Circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems , 39(5):5981–5986, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Hesitant fuzzy sets

    Vicenç Torra. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International journal of intelligent systems , 25(6):529–539, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Picture fuzzy sets

    Bui Cong Cuong. Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics , 30:409, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Single valued neutrosophic graphs

    Said Broumi, Mohamed Talea, Assia Bakali, and Florentin Smarandache. Single valued neutrosophic graphs. Journal of New theory , 10:86–101, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Single valued neu- trosophic sets

    Haibin Wang, Florentin Smarandache, Yanqing Zhang, and Rajshekhar Sunderraman. Single valued neu- trosophic sets . Infinite study, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean soft set

    R Radha, A Stanis Arul Mary, and Florentin Smarandache. Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean soft set. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Volume 14, 2021 , page 11, 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Pentapartitioned neutrosophic set and its properties , volume 36

    Rama Mallick and Surapati Pramanik. Pentapartitioned neutrosophic set and its properties , volume 36. Infinite Study, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    An integrated decision-making framework for blended teaching quality evaluation in college english courses based on the double-valued neutrosophic sets

    Lin Wei. An integrated decision-making framework for blended teaching quality evaluation in college english courses based on the double-valued neutrosophic sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. , 45:3259–3266, 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    On hesitant neutrosophic rough set over two universes and its application

    Hu Zhao and Hong-Ying Zhang. On hesitant neutrosophic rough set over two universes and its application. Artificial Intelligence Review , 53:4387–4406, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Rough sets

    Zdzisław Pawlak. Rough sets. International journal of computer & information sciences , 11:341–356, 1982

    work page 1982

  13. [13]

    Rough neutrosophic sets

    Said Broumi, Florentin Smarandache, and Mamoni Dhar. Rough neutrosophic sets. Infinite Study , 32:493–502, 2014

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets-revisited

    Florentin Smarandache. Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets-revisited. Infinite study, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Extension of HyperGraph to n-SuperHyperGraph and to Plithogenic n- SuperHyperGraph, and Extension of HyperAlgebra to n-ary (Classical-/Neutro-/Anti-) HyperAlgebra

    Florentin Smarandache. Extension of HyperGraph to n-SuperHyperGraph and to Plithogenic n- SuperHyperGraph, and Extension of HyperAlgebra to n-ary (Classical-/Neutro-/Anti-) HyperAlgebra . In- finite Study, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Soft sets and soft rough sets

    Feng Feng, Xiaoyan Liu, Violeta Leoreanu-Fotea, and Young Bae Jun. Soft sets and soft rough sets. Information Sciences , 181(6):1125–1137, 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Soft set theory-first results

    Dmitriy Molodtsov. Soft set theory-first results. Computers & mathematics with applications , 37(4- 5):19–31, 1999

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    A note on z-numbers

    Lotfi A Zadeh. A note on z-numbers. Information sciences , 181(14):2923–2932, 2011

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic

    Florentin Smarandache. A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic. In Philosophy, pages 1–141. Amer- ican Research Press, 1999

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Multi-valued picture fuzzy soft sets and their applications in group decision-making problems

    Naeem Jan, Tahir Mahmood, Lemnaouar Zedam, and Zeeshan Ali. Multi-valued picture fuzzy soft sets and their applications in group decision-making problems. Soft Computing , 24:18857 – 18879, 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    An adaptive hate speech detection approach using neutrosophic neural networks for social media forensics

    Yasmine M Ibrahim, Reem Essameldin, and Saad M Darwish. An adaptive hate speech detection approach using neutrosophic neural networks for social media forensics. Computers, Materials & Continua , 79(1), 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    A novel approach for cyber-attack detection in iot networks with neutrosophic neural networks

    OM Khaled, AA Salama, Mostafa Herajy, MM El-Kirany, Huda E Khalid, Ahmed K Essa, and Ramiz Sabbagh. A novel approach for cyber-attack detection in iot networks with neutrosophic neural networks. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems , 86(1):48, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Zdzislaw Pawlak, S. K. Michael Wong, Wojciech Ziarko, et al. Rough sets: probabilistic versus deterministic approach. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , 29(1):81–95, 1988

    work page 1988

  24. [24]

    Data-driven sample average approximation with covariate information

    Rohit Kannan, Güzin Bayraksan, and James R Luedtke. Data-driven sample average approximation with covariate information. Operations Research, 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Exploring the boundary region of tolerance rough sets for feature selection

    Neil Mac Parthalain and Qiang Shen. Exploring the boundary region of tolerance rough sets for feature selection. Pattern recognition, 42(5):655–667, 2009. 145 Bibliography 146

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Rough sets methods in feature reduction and classification

    Roman W Świniarski. Rough sets methods in feature reduction and classification. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science , 2001

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis

    Salvatore Greco, Benedetto Matarazzo, and Roman Slowinski. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European journal of operational research , 129(1):1–47, 2001

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    Intelligent decision support: handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory

    Shi-Yu Huang. Intelligent decision support: handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory . Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Rough sets in machine learning: a review

    Rafael Bello and Rafael Falcon. Rough sets in machine learning: a review. Thriving Rough Sets: 10th Anniversary-Honoring Professor Zdzisław Pawlak’s Life and Legacy & 35 Years of Rough Sets , pages 87–118, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Fuzzy rough sets and fuzzy rough neural networks for feature selection: A review

    Wanting Ji, Yan Pang, Xiaoyun Jia, Zhongwei Wang, Feng Hou, Baoyan Song, Mingzhe Liu, and Ruili Wang. Fuzzy rough sets and fuzzy rough neural networks for feature selection: A review. Wiley Interdis- ciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 11(3):e1402, 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Rough set reduction of attributes and their domains for neural networks

    Jacek Jelonek, Krzysztof Krawiec, and Roman Slowiński. Rough set reduction of attributes and their domains for neural networks. Computational intelligence , 11(2):339–347, 1995

    work page 1995

  32. [32]

    Rough sets: Selected methods and applications in management and engineering

    Georg Peters, Pawan Lingras, Dominik Lzak, and Yiyu Yao. Rough sets: Selected methods and applications in management and engineering. In Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing , 2012

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Kansei engineering and application of the rough sets model

    Mitsuo Nagamachi, Y Okazaki, and Mizuho Ishikawa. Kansei engineering and application of the rough sets model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 220:763 – 768, 2006

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Employing a generalization of open sets defined by ideals to initiate novel rough approximation spaces with a chemical application

    M Hosny and Tareq Al-shami. Employing a generalization of open sets defined by ideals to initiate novel rough approximation spaces with a chemical application. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 17(4):3436–3463, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Prediction of protein structural class with rough sets

    Youfang Cao, Shi Liu, Lida Zhang, Jie Qin, Jiang Wang, and Kexuan Tang. Prediction of protein structural class with rough sets. BMC bioinformatics , 7(1):20, 2006

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Fault diagnosis using rough sets theory

    Lixiang Shen, Francis EH Tay, Liangsheng Qu, and Yudi Shen. Fault diagnosis using rough sets theory. Computers in industry , 43(1):61–72, 2000

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , volume 9

    Zdzisław Pawlak. Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , volume 9. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis

    Zdzislaw Pawlak. Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybernetics & Systems , 29(7):661–688, 1998

    work page 1998

  39. [39]

    Generalized rough sets based on relations

    William Zhu. Generalized rough sets based on relations. Information Sciences , 177(22):4997–5011, 2007

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Topology vs generalized rough sets

    Zhi Pei, Daowu Pei, and Li Zheng. Topology vs generalized rough sets. International Journal of Approxi- mate Reasoning, 52(2):231–239, 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets

    William Zhu and Fei-Yue Wang. Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets. Informa- tion sciences , 152:217–230, 2003

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Generalized rough sets

    JingTao Yao, Davide Ciucci, and Yan Zhang. Generalized rough sets. Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence, pages 413–424, 2015

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    On the topological properties of generalized rough sets

    Hai Yu and Wan-rong Zhan. On the topological properties of generalized rough sets. Information Sciences, 263:141–152, 2014

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Short introduction to rough, hyperrough, superhyperrough, treerough, and multirough set

    Takaaki Fujita. Short introduction to rough, hyperrough, superhyperrough, treerough, and multirough set. Advancing Uncertain Combinatorics through Graphization, Hyperization, and Uncertainization: Fuzzy, Neutrosophic, Soft, Rough, and Beyond , page 394, 2025

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Hierarchical (m, n)-superhypersoft and (m, n)-superhyperrough sets: More unified multi- layer framework for advanced uncertainty modeling

    Takaaki Fujita. Hierarchical (m, n)-superhypersoft and (m, n)-superhyperrough sets: More unified multi- layer framework for advanced uncertainty modeling. Authorea Preprints, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Weighted rough set model

    Tinghuai Ma and Meili Tang. Weighted rough set model. In Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications , volume 1, pages 481–485. IEEE, 2006

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    Optimized ensemble learning- based student’s performance prediction with weighted rough set theory enabled feature mining

    Nayani Sateesh, Pasupureddy Srinivasa Rao, and Davuluri Rajya Lakshmi. Optimized ensemble learning- based student’s performance prediction with weighted rough set theory enabled feature mining. Concur- rency and Computation: Practice and Experience , 35(7):e7601, 2023

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Weighted rough set learning: towards a subjective approach

    Jinfu Liu, Qinghua Hu, and Daren Yu. Weighted rough set learning: towards a subjective approach. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 11th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2007, Nanjing, China, May 22-25, 2007. Proceedings 11 , pages 696–703. Springer, 2007

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    A strategy to reduce the control packet load of aodv using weighted rough set model for manet

    Nagaraju Aitha and Ramachandram Srinadas. A strategy to reduce the control packet load of aodv using weighted rough set model for manet. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology , 8(1):108–117, 2009

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    Feature selection based on weighted fuzzy rough sets

    Changzhong Wang, Changyue Wang, Yuhua Qian, and Qiangkui Leng. Feature selection based on weighted fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , 32(7):4027–4037, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Anomaly detection based on weighted fuzzy-rough density

    Zhong Yuan, Baiyang Chen, Jia Liu, Hongmei Chen, Dezhong Peng, and Peilin Li. Anomaly detection based on weighted fuzzy-rough density. Applied Soft Computing , 134:109995, 2023. 147 Bibliography

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    A weighted rough set based method developed for class imbalance learning

    Jinfu Liu, Qinghua Hu, and Daren Yu. A weighted rough set based method developed for class imbalance learning. Information Sciences , 178(4):1235–1256, 2008

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection

    Qinghua Hu, Daren Yu, Jinfu Liu, and Congxin Wu. Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection. Information sciences , 178(18):3577–3594, 2008

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    Subset neighborhood rough sets

    Tareq M Al-shami and Davide Ciucci. Subset neighborhood rough sets. Knowledge-Based Systems , 237:107868, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Feature subset selection based on fuzzy neighborhood rough sets

    Changzhong Wang, Mingwen Shao, Qiang He, Yuhua Qian, and Yali Qi. Feature subset selection based on fuzzy neighborhood rough sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 111:173–179, 2016

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Measures of uncertainty for neighborhood rough sets

    Yumin Chen, Yu Xue, Ying Ma, and Feifei Xu. Measures of uncertainty for neighborhood rough sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 120:226–235, 2017

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    A game-theoretic sequential three-way decision using probabilistic rough sets and multiple levels of granularity

    TV Soumya and MK Sabu. A game-theoretic sequential three-way decision using probabilistic rough sets and multiple levels of granularity. Discover Computing , 28(1):211, 2025

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Sequential rough set: a conservative extension of pawlak’s classical rough set

    Wenyan Xu, Yucong Yan, and Xiaonan Li. Sequential rough set: a conservative extension of pawlak’s classical rough set. Artificial Intelligence Review , 58(1):1–33, 2025

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Contrasoft set and contrarough set with using upside-down logic

    Takaaki Fujita, Raed Hatamleh, and Ahmed Salem Heilat. Contrasoft set and contrarough set with using upside-down logic. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing , 2025

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Probabilistic rough set approximations

    Yiyu Yao. Probabilistic rough set approximations. International journal of approximate reasoning , 49(2):255–271, 2008

    work page 2008

  61. [61]

    Probabilistic rough sets

    Yiyu Yao, Salvatore Greco, and Roman Słowiński. Probabilistic rough sets. Springer handbook of compu- tational intelligence , pages 387–411, 2015

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Analyzing uncertainties of probabilistic rough set regions with game- theoretic rough sets

    Nouman Azam and JingTao Yao. Analyzing uncertainties of probabilistic rough set regions with game- theoretic rough sets. International journal of approximate reasoning , 55(1):142–155, 2014

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Weighted multi-granularity fuzzy probabilistic rough set based on semi-overlapping function and its application in three-way decision

    Xinru Li, Lingqiang Li, and Chengzhao Jia. Weighted multi-granularity fuzzy probabilistic rough set based on semi-overlapping function and its application in three-way decision. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. , 161:112023, 2025

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    T. V. Soumya and M. K. Sabu. A game-theoretic sequential three-way decision using probabilistic rough sets and multiple levels of granularity. Discover Computing , 28, 2025

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Maximal consistent blocks-based opti- mistic and pessimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy sets and their applications in three-way multiple attribute decision-making

    Yan Lindsay Sun, Bin Pang, Ju-Sheng Mi, and Wei-Zhi Wu. Maximal consistent blocks-based opti- mistic and pessimistic probabilistic rough fuzzy sets and their applications in three-way multiple attribute decision-making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. , 187:109529, 2025

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Incremental fuzzy probabilistic rough sets over two universes

    Jie Hu, Tianrui Li, Chuan Luo, Hamido Fujita, and Shaoyong Li. Incremental fuzzy probabilistic rough sets over two universes. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 81:28–48, 2017

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Three-way decisions based on multi- granulation support intuitionistic fuzzy probabilistic rough sets

    Zhan’ao Xue, Li-Ping Zhao, Min Zhang, and Bing-Xin Sun. Three-way decisions based on multi- granulation support intuitionistic fuzzy probabilistic rough sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems , 38(4):5013–5031, 2020

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Multi-granulation interval-valued fuzzy probabilistic rough sets and their corresponding three-way decisions based on interval-valued fuzzy preference relations

    Prasenjit Mandal and AS Ranadive. Multi-granulation interval-valued fuzzy probabilistic rough sets and their corresponding three-way decisions based on interval-valued fuzzy preference relations. Granular Computing, 4(1):89–108, 2019

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    Probabilistic variable precision fuzzy rough sets

    Manish Aggarwal. Probabilistic variable precision fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , 24(1):29–39, 2015

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Machine learning: rough sets perspective

    Wojciech Ziarko and Ning Shan. Machine learning: rough sets perspective. In Proceedings of International Conference on Expert Systems for Development , pages 114–118. IEEE, 1994

    work page 1994

  71. [71]

    Data-driven Mod- elling with Fuzzy Sets: A Neutrosophic Perspective

    Said Broumi, D Nagarajan, Michael Gr Voskoglou, and Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah. Data-driven Mod- elling with Fuzzy Sets: A Neutrosophic Perspective . CRC Press, 2024

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Handbook of research on the applications of neutrosophic sets theory and their extensions in education

    Said Broumi. Handbook of research on the applications of neutrosophic sets theory and their extensions in education. IGI Global, 2023

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    T. Fujita. Note of indetermrough set and indetermhyperrough set. Information Sciences with Applications , 7:1–14, 2025

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Indetermsoft set for talent training quality assessment in university engineering management under the background of” dual carbon”

    Li Li. Indetermsoft set for talent training quality assessment in university engineering management under the background of” dual carbon” . Neutrosophic Sets and Systems , 83:148–158, 2025

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Indetermsoft set for digital marketing effectiveness evaluation driven by big data based on consumer behavior

    Tao Shen and Chunmei Mao. Indetermsoft set for digital marketing effectiveness evaluation driven by big data based on consumer behavior. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems , 82:352–369, 2025

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Risk management of import and export products based on big data analysis: Assessment model with indetermsoft set

    Ling Chen and Chunpeng Liu. Risk management of import and export products based on big data analysis: Assessment model with indetermsoft set. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems , 82:742–756, 2025

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision

    Vicenç Torra and Yasuo Narukawa. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems , pages 1378–1382. IEEE, 2009

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Hesitant triangular neutrosophic numbers and their applications to madm

    Abhijit Saha, Irfan Deli, and Said Broumi. Hesitant triangular neutrosophic numbers and their applications to madm. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems , 35:269–298, 2020. Bibliography 148

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Optimizing site selection for construction and demo- lition waste resource treatment plants using a hesitant neutrosophic set: a case study in xiamen, china

    Yiwei Chen, Qiu Xie, Xiaoyu Ma, and Yuwei Li. Optimizing site selection for construction and demo- lition waste resource treatment plants using a hesitant neutrosophic set: a case study in xiamen, china. Engineering Optimization , 57(11):3186–3207, 2025

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    A multi-attribute VIKOR decision-making method based on hesitant neutrosophic sets

    Run-yu Zhang, Mingyang Yu, and Yan Gao. A multi-attribute VIKOR decision-making method based on hesitant neutrosophic sets . Infinite Study, 2017

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.