pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19870 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Melting temperature shifts from quantum fluctuations in generalized Wigner crystals

Aman Kumar , Sogoud Sherif , Veit Elser , Hitesh J. Changlani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords generalized Wigner crystalsquantum fluctuationsmelting temperaturemoiré systemsextended Hubbard modeltriangular latticecharge ordertransition metal dichalcogenides
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum fluctuations can raise the melting temperature of generalized Wigner crystals instead of always lowering it.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

It is generally believed that quantum fluctuations always collaborate with thermal ones to lower transition temperatures by softening ordered states. This paper shows that the interplay can instead be competitive in generalized Wigner crystals, so that increasing quantum fluctuations sometimes raises the melting temperature. Numerical results from finite temperature Lanczos calculations on an extended Hubbard model for triangular lattices demonstrate that quantum corrections account for experimental melting temperatures that deviate by more than 50 percent from classical estimates. A perturbative analysis treating kinetic energy on top of a classical crystal configuration then explains when the melting temperature rises or falls with bandwidth.

Core claim

We show that quantum effects capture the shift relative to the classical estimates, which in some cases are more than 50 percent off from the experimental values. Then building on these numerical findings, we provide a qualitative picture that clarifies that while quantum melting of GWC (by increasing the bandwidth) naturally softens the ground state order parameter, it does not always decrease the melting temperature; conversely it can increase it. Our predictions should be observable in future experiments where the bandwidth can be tuned.

What carries the argument

Finite temperature Lanczos calculations on the extended Hubbard model (with double-gate screened or nearest-neighbor interactions) on the triangular lattice, supplemented by finite temperature perturbation theory that treats kinetic energy perturbatively around a classical Wigner crystal.

Load-bearing premise

The extended Hubbard model on the triangular lattice accurately represents the physics of generalized Wigner crystals in WS2/WSe2 moiré heterobilayers so that the calculated shifts apply directly to experiment.

What would settle it

Tuning the bandwidth in a WS2/WSe2 moiré system and measuring whether the generalized Wigner crystal melting temperature increases or decreases in the density regimes predicted by the perturbation theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19870 by Aman Kumar, Hitesh J. Changlani, Sogoud Sherif, Veit Elser.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the specific heat (heat capacity per site in arbitrary units), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Normalized critical temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic of a single domain wall (marked in grey) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Specific heat (heat capacity per site in arbitrary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The top panel shows two geometries (28-site and 20- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. A plot of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is generally believed that quantum fluctuations collaborate with thermal fluctuations, effectively reducing transition temperatures (e.g. for melting of charge order). We show that this is not always the case and that the interplay between quantum and thermal fluctuations can be competitive. We find excellent motivation for addressing this thanks to the discovery of correlated insulating "generalized Wigner crystal" (GWC) states in hetero-bilayer transition metal dichalcogenide (WS$_2$/WSe$_2$) moir\'e systems [Y. Xu, et al., Nature 587, 214-218 (2020)]. We account for the impact of quantum effects on the melting temperature of GWCs, carrying out finite temperature Lanczos calculations on an extended Hubbard model on the triangular lattice (both with a double-gate screened potential, and the nearest neighbor model) for multiple electron densities. We show that quantum effects capture the shift relative to the classical estimates, which in some cases are more than 50 percent off from the experimental values. Then building on these numerical findings, we provide a qualitative picture that clarifies that while quantum melting of GWC (by increasing the bandwidth) naturally softens the ground state order parameter, it does not always decrease the melting temperature; conversely it can increase it. To do so we employ a finite temperature perturbation theory, treating the kinetic energy perturbatively on top of a classical Wigner crystal. Our predictions should be observable in future experiments where the bandwidth can be tuned.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that quantum fluctuations do not always collaborate with thermal fluctuations to lower the melting temperature Tm of generalized Wigner crystals (GWCs) in WS2/WSe2 moiré systems; instead, they can compete and raise Tm. Using finite-temperature Lanczos on the extended Hubbard model (triangular lattice, double-gate screened or nearest-neighbor interactions) at multiple fillings, the authors show quantum shifts relative to classical estimates that reach >50% and better match experiment. They then employ finite-temperature perturbation theory (kinetic term expanded around a classical Wigner-crystal background) to argue that increasing bandwidth softens the ground-state order parameter yet can still increase Tm.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result is significant: it provides a counter-example to the conventional expectation that quantum fluctuations always suppress charge-ordering temperatures and supplies a concrete mechanism (competitive quantum-thermal interplay) that could be tested by bandwidth tuning in moiré devices. The combination of unbiased Lanczos numerics with an analytic perturbative picture is a methodological strength, and the direct comparison to experimental Tm values adds falsifiability.

major comments (2)
  1. [finite-temperature perturbation theory section] § on finite-temperature perturbation theory (the qualitative picture following the Lanczos results): the expansion assumes a small kinetic-energy perturbation around the classical Wigner crystal. Yet the same manuscript reports Lanczos shifts >50% for several densities; such shifts imply t/V ratios that are no longer perturbatively small, undermining the controlled use of the expansion to explain why Tm can increase. A direct comparison of the perturbative Tm shift against Lanczos data at the same parameters where the shift exceeds ~30% is required to establish the regime of validity.
  2. [Lanczos results] Lanczos results paragraph (the >50% shift claim): the manuscript states that quantum effects capture the experimental discrepancy, but does not report the precise filling factors, interaction strengths, or error bars on the extracted Tm values. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the 50% figure is robust or an artifact of finite-size extrapolation or the specific choice of double-gate vs. nearest-neighbor potential.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract/introduction] The abstract and introduction refer to 'classical estimates' without citing the specific classical Monte Carlo or mean-field calculation used for the reference Tm; adding that reference would clarify the baseline.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for the Lanczos data should explicitly state the system sizes employed and the extrapolation procedure to the thermodynamic limit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. The positive assessment of the significance is appreciated. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [finite-temperature perturbation theory section] § on finite-temperature perturbation theory (the qualitative picture following the Lanczos results): the expansion assumes a small kinetic-energy perturbation around the classical Wigner crystal. Yet the same manuscript reports Lanczos shifts >50% for several densities; such shifts imply t/V ratios that are no longer perturbatively small, undermining the controlled use of the expansion to explain why Tm can increase. A direct comparison of the perturbative Tm shift against Lanczos data at the same parameters where the shift exceeds ~30% is required to establish the regime of validity.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important point on the controlled use of perturbation theory. The finite-temperature perturbative expansion is employed to furnish a qualitative mechanism illustrating how quantum fluctuations can compete with thermal fluctuations and raise Tm, rather than to yield quantitative predictions at large t/V. We acknowledge that shifts exceeding 50% indicate parameters outside the strictly perturbative regime. To address the concern directly, we will add to the revised manuscript a side-by-side comparison of the perturbative Tm shift versus the Lanczos results at parameters where the shift is approximately 30%, thereby clarifying the expansion's regime of validity while preserving its role in providing physical insight. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Lanczos results] Lanczos results paragraph (the >50% shift claim): the manuscript states that quantum effects capture the experimental discrepancy, but does not report the precise filling factors, interaction strengths, or error bars on the extracted Tm values. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the 50% figure is robust or an artifact of finite-size extrapolation or the specific choice of double-gate vs. nearest-neighbor potential.

    Authors: We apologize for the insufficient detail in the reporting of parameters. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly list the filling factors (e.g., ν = 1/3, 1/4, and additional densities examined), the corresponding interaction strengths (V/t ratios), and the error bars obtained from finite-size extrapolations of Tm. We will also state clearly for each density whether the double-gate screened Coulomb potential or the nearest-neighbor interaction was employed, enabling an unambiguous evaluation of the robustness of the reported shifts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; Lanczos numerics and perturbation theory are independent calculations.

full rationale

The paper's central results derive from direct finite-temperature Lanczos diagonalization on the extended Hubbard model (with screened or nearest-neighbor interactions) at multiple fillings, which are compared to classical estimates and experiment. A separate finite-temperature perturbation theory (kinetic term treated perturbatively around a classical Wigner crystal background) is introduced only afterward to supply qualitative intuition for why Tm can increase. Neither step reduces to the other by construction, no parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, and no self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear as load-bearing elements. The model-to-experiment comparison is external validation rather than an internal fit, leaving the derivation chain self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the assumption that the chosen model and numerical methods accurately reflect the experimental system without additional fitted parameters beyond standard ones.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The extended Hubbard model on the triangular lattice with double-gate screened potential or nearest neighbor interactions describes the generalized Wigner crystals in WS2/WSe2 moiré systems.
    This model is the basis for all numerical and theoretical calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1361 out tokens · 173544 ms · 2026-05-10T01:04:09.525092+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    glassiness

    library and our custom codes. We thank the Re- search Computing Center (RCC) and the Planck cluster at Florida State University for computational resources. This work also used Bridges-2 at Pittsburgh Super- computing Center through allocation PHY240324 (To- wards predictive modeling of strongly correlated quan- tum matter) from the Advanced Cyberinfrastr...

  2. [2]

    Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Phys. Rev.46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  3. [3]

    D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)

    1980

  4. [4]

    Nagara, Y

    H. Nagara, Y. Nagata, and T. Nakamura, Melting of the wigner crystal at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. A36, 1859 (1987)

    1987

  5. [5]

    Tanatar and D

    B. Tanatar and D. M. Ceperley, Ground state of the two- dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B39, 5005 (1989)

    1989

  6. [6]

    A. C. Mehta, C. J. Umrigar, J. S. Meyer, and H. U. Baranger, Zigzag phase transition in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 246802 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Smith, Y

    C. Smith, Y. Chen, R. Levy, Y. Yang, M. A. Morales, and S. Zhang, Unified variational approach description of ground-state phases of the two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 266504 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Y.-C. Tsui, M. He, Y. Hu, E. Lake, T. Wang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Direct observation of a magnetic-field-induced wigner crystal, Nature628, 287 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlated in- sulating states at fractional fillings of moir´ e superlattices, Nature587, 214–218 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    H. Li, S. Li, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Kahn, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, M. F. Crommie, and F. Wang, Imag- ing two-dimensional generalized wigner crystals, Nature 597, 650 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    C. Jin, Z. Tao, T. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Tang, J. Zhu, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Stripe phases in wse2/ws2 moir´ e super- lattices, Nature Materials20, 940–944 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta, M. Blei, J. D. Carlstr¨ om, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Mott and generalized wigner crystal states in wse2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359–363 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Huang, T

    X. Huang, T. Wang, S. Miao, C. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Lian, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Okamoto, D. Xiao, S.- F. Shi, and Y.-T. Cui, Correlated insulating states at fractional fillings of the ws2/wse2 moir´ e lattice, Nature Physics17, 715–719 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    H. Pan, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Quantum phase dia- gram of a moir´ e-hubbard model, Physical Review B102, 201104 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hub- bard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Morales-Dur´ an, P

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, P. Potasz, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Magnetism and quantum melting in moir´ e-material wigner crystals, Phys. Rev. B107, 235131 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    S. F. Ung, J. Lee, and D. R. Reichman, Competing gen- eralized wigner crystal states in moir´ e heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B108, 245113 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Y. Zhou, I. Esterlis, and T. Smole´ nski, Electronic crys- tals in layered materials (2025), arXiv:2509.21222 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Motruk, D

    J. Motruk, D. Rossi, D. A. Abanin, and L. Rademaker, Kagome chiral spin liquid in transition metal dichalco- genide moir´ e bilayers, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022049 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Y. Tan, P. K. H. Tsang, V. Dobrosavljevi´ c, and L. Rade- maker, Doping a wigner-mott insulator: Exotic charge orders in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e heterobi- layers, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043190 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Musser, T

    S. Musser, T. Senthil, and D. Chowdhury, Theory of a continuous bandwidth-tuned wigner-mott transition, Phys. Rev. B106, 155145 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Zhang, T

    Y. Zhang, T. Liu, and L. Fu, Electronic structures, charge transfer, and charge order in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Phys. Rev. B103, 155142 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Y. Yang, M. A. Morales, and S. Zhang, Metal-insulator transition in a semiconductor heterobilayer model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 076503 (2024)

    2024

  24. [25]

    Matty and E.-A

    M. Matty and E.-A. Kim, Melting of generalized wigner crystals in transition metal dichalcogenide het- erobilayer moir´ e systems, Nature Communications13, 10.1038/s41467-022-34683-x (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34683-x 2022

  25. [26]

    Morales-Dur´ an, A

    N. Morales-Dur´ an, A. H. MacDonald, and P. Potasz, Metal-insulator transition in transition metal dichalco- genide heterobilayer moir´ e superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 103, L241110 (2021)

    2021

  26. [27]

    Padhi, R

    B. Padhi, R. Chitra, and P. W. Phillips, Generalized wigner crystallization in moir´ e materials, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125146 (2021)

    2021

  27. [28]

    Biborski and M

    A. Biborski and M. Zegrodnik, Charge and spin proper- ties of a generalized wigner crystal realized in the moir´ e wse2/ws2 heterobilayer, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11202 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    Kumar, C

    A. Kumar, C. Lewandowski, and H. J. Changlani,Ori- gin and stability of generalized Wigner crystallinity in triangular moir´ e systems, npj Quantum Materials10, 95 (2025)

    2025

  29. [30]

    Y. Tang, J. Gu, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Dielectric catastrophe at the wigner-mott transition in a moir´ e superlattice, Na- ture Communications13, 4271 (2022)

    2022

  30. [32]

    Jakliˇ c and P

    J. Jakliˇ c and P. Prelovˇ sek, Lanczos method for the calcu- lation of finite-temperature quantities in correlated sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B49, 5065 (1994)

    1994

  31. [33]

    Prelovˇ sek and J

    P. Prelovˇ sek and J. Bonˇ ca, Ground state and finite tem- perature lanczos methods, inStrongly Correlated Sys- tems: Numerical Methods, edited by A. Avella and F. Mancini (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 2013) pp. 1–30

    2013

  32. [34]

    K. Lee, P. Sharma, O. Vafek, and H. J. Changlani,Trian- gular lattice Hubbard model physics at intermediate tem- peratures, Physical Review B107, 235105 (2023)

    2023

  33. [35]

    A more detailed analysis of the physics associated with the ground state phase transitions, with spin incorpo- rated, will be addressed elsewhere

  34. [36]

    Sch¨ uler, M

    M. Sch¨ uler, M. R¨ osner, T. O. Wehling, A. I. Lichten- stein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Optimal Hubbard Mod- els for Materials with Nonlocal Coulomb Interactions: 13 Graphene, Silicene, and Benzene, Physical Review Let- ters111, 036601 (2013)

    2013

  35. [37]

    H. J. Changlani, H. Zheng, and L. K. Wag- ner, Density-matrix based determination of low- energy model Hamiltonians from ab initio wave- functions, The Journal of Chemical Physics143, 102814 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4927664/15502754/102814 1 online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4927664/15502754/102814 2015

  36. [38]

    Zheng, H

    H. Zheng, H. J. Changlani, K. T. Williams, B. Buse- meyer, and L. K. Wagner, From real materials to model hamiltonians with density matrix downfolding, Frontiers in Physics6, 10.3389/fphy.2018.00043 (2018)

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00043 2018

  37. [39]

    Y. Zhou, D. N. Sheng, and E.-A. Kim, Quantum melt- ing of generalized wigner crystals in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 156501 (2024)

    2024

  38. [40]

    Hotta and N

    C. Hotta and N. Furukawa, Strong coupling theory of the spinless charges on triangular lattices: Possible for- mation of a gapless charge-ordered liquid, Phys. Rev. B 74, 193107 (2006)

    2006

  39. [41]

    L. F. Tocchio, C. Gros, X.-F. Zhang, and S. Eggert, Phase diagram of the triangular extended hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 246405 (2014)

    2014

  40. [42]

    Merino, A

    J. Merino, A. Ralko, and S. Fratini, Emergent heavy fermion behavior at the wigner-mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 126403 (2013)

    2013

  41. [43]

    A more detailed study of then= 1/2 NN case will be presented elsewhere

  42. [44]

    Villain, R

    J. Villain, R. Bidaux, J.-P. Carton, and R. Conte, Order as an effect of disorder, Journal de Physique41, 1263 (1980)

    1980

  43. [45]

    C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a frustrated vector antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2056 (1989)

    2056

  44. [46]

    Hammam, C

    M. Hammam, C. Lewandowski, V. Dobrosavljevic, and S. Joy, Is disorder a friend or a foe to melting of wigner-mott insulators? (2025), arXiv:2512.07932 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [47]

    Jain and C

    A. Jain and C. Huang, Elementary Excitations, Melt- ing Temperature and Correlation Energy in Wigner Crystal, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.04538 (2025), arXiv:2504.04538 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [48]

    H. J. Changlani, Quantum versus classical effects at zero and finite temperature in the quantum pyrochlore Yb2Ti2O7, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1710.02234 (2017)

    work page arXiv 2017

  47. [49]

    Scheie, J

    A. Scheie, J. Kindervater, S. S¨ aubert, C. Duvinage, C. Pfleiderer, H. J. Changlani, S. Zhang, L. Harriger, K. Arpino, S. M. Koohpayeh, O. Tchernyshyov, and C. Broholm, Reentrant phase diagram of Yb 2Ti2O7 in a⟨111⟩magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 127201 (2017)

    2017

  48. [50]

    A. M. Hallas, J. Gaudet, and B. D. Gaulin, Experimental insights into ground-state selection of quantum xy py- rochlores, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9, 105 (2018)

    2018

  49. [51]

    R. G. Melko, A. Paramekanti, A. A. Burkov, A. Vish- wanath, D. N. Sheng, and L. Balents, Supersolid order from disorder: Hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 127207 (2005)

    2005

  50. [52]

    Boninsegni and N

    M. Boninsegni and N. Prokof’ev, Supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237204 (2005)

    2005

  51. [53]

    Heidarian and K

    D. Heidarian and K. Damle, Persistent supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 127206 (2005)

    2005

  52. [54]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov,QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems part I: spin chains, SciPost Phys.2, 003 (2017)

    2017

  53. [55]

    Marinari and G

    E. Marinari and G. Parisi, Simulated tempering: A new monte carlo scheme, Europhysics Letters19, 451 (1992)

    1992

  54. [56]

    Hukushima, K

    K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, Exchange monte carlo method and application to spin glass simulations, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan65, 1604 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.65.1604

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.65.1604 1996