pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20071 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.CY

Enhancing immersion in Virtual Reality sports through Physical Interactions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.CY
keywords virtual realityimmersionphysical controllersHCIsports simulationskatingtangible interaction
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A physical controller prototype using realistic tangible mapping can solve HCI problems in existing VR controllers and raise immersion levels in a skating simulation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to identify the shortcomings of current VR controllers when used for sports. It then builds and tests a custom physical controller that maps real hand and body movements more directly onto virtual skating actions. Users play the same VR game with the prototype and with off-the-shelf controllers, then rate their experience on standard scales for interactivity, perceived reality, spatial presence, and enjoyment. The goal is to show that sport-specific tangible designs produce measurably better immersion than generic controllers. The results are intended to supply practical guidelines for future controller design in other virtual sports.

Core claim

A physical controller prototype with realistic tangible mapping bridges the gap between real-world actions and virtual-world responses in a skating game, thereby overcoming the main HCI limitations of existing VR controllers and producing higher user ratings for perceived interactivity, reality, spatial presence, and enjoyment.

What carries the argument

The physical controller prototype with realistic tangible mapping, which translates actual body movements into corresponding virtual skating controls more directly than standard handheld devices.

If this is right

  • Users will report higher perceived reality and interactivity when the prototype replaces standard controllers in the skating game.
  • The prototype will increase measured spatial presence and overall enjoyment relative to market alternatives.
  • The design process will identify concrete parameters, such as mapping fidelity and physical feedback, that should guide future sport-specific VR controllers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mapping principle could be tested in other VR sports that involve repeated limb motions, such as rowing or tennis.
  • Quantitative performance data, such as lap times or fall rates, could be added to the subjective Likert ratings to check whether immersion gains also improve task outcomes.
  • Longer-term studies might reveal whether repeated use of such controllers reduces motion sickness or increases transfer of skills back to real skating.

Load-bearing premise

That translating real physical movements into the virtual skating game through a custom controller will produce noticeably higher immersion scores than existing market controllers.

What would settle it

If the same participants give equal or lower Likert-scale scores on interactivity, reality, presence, and enjoyment after using the new prototype compared with commercial controllers, the central claim is falsified.

read the original abstract

Recent discoveries in VR have opened up scope for designing physical tools and controllers to enhance immersion, through perceived reality. In a virtually simulated sports scenario it is challenging to immerse user because most of the available controllers are unable to bridge the user experience in the real world to the actions in the virtual world. My research is to identify HCI problems in existing VR controllers, design a physical controller prototype with realistic tangible mapping, trying to solve the existing problems and evaluate it in a designed VR game for skating. Its immersiveness would be graded on Likert scale on parameters like perceived interactivity and reality, spatial presence and enjoyment. The evaluation will be done after trial runs and feedback sessions by playing the game with the designed controller and comparing it with ones available in the market. The findings will help people understand what all parameters we should consider while designing futuristic controllers, customized for a particular sport.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a research proposal to enhance immersion in VR sports (specifically skating) by identifying HCI problems in existing controllers, designing a physical prototype with realistic tangible mapping, implementing it in a custom VR game, and evaluating immersion via Likert-scale ratings of perceived interactivity, reality, spatial presence, and enjoyment, with comparisons to market controllers. The findings are intended to inform parameters for future sport-specific controller design.

Significance. The proposed focus on tangible physical mapping for VR sports controllers addresses a relevant HCI challenge in bridging real-world actions to virtual environments. However, because the manuscript contains no completed prototype, no specific HCI problems identified, no game implementation, and no evaluation data or analysis, its significance is limited to outlining a conceptual plan rather than delivering validated insights or contributions.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract and overall manuscript: The central contribution is framed as identifying specific HCI problems and designing/evaluating a prototype, yet no concrete problems, design details, tangible mapping mechanisms, or preliminary results are provided, making the proposal too high-level to assess feasibility or novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript and providing constructive feedback. We acknowledge that the work is framed as a research proposal rather than a completed empirical study, and we will revise the manuscript to better reflect this scope while strengthening its conceptual contributions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and overall manuscript: The central contribution is framed as identifying specific HCI problems and designing/evaluating a prototype, yet no concrete problems, design details, tangible mapping mechanisms, or preliminary results are provided, making the proposal too high-level to assess feasibility or novelty.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript is high-level, as it describes a planned research project to identify HCI issues in VR sports controllers, design a tangible prototype for skating, and evaluate immersion through user studies. The central contribution is the proposed approach of realistic tangible mapping to bridge real-world actions with virtual environments, informed by existing literature on VR controller limitations such as inadequate haptic feedback and action mismatches. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and related work sections to explicitly position the paper as a research proposal, expand the discussion of potential HCI problems (e.g., lack of physical correspondence in commercial devices), and elaborate on the conceptual design parameters for the prototype without claiming completed implementation or results. This will improve clarity on feasibility and novelty while remaining faithful to the prospective nature of the work. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Providing concrete HCI problems identified through original analysis, specific prototype design details, tangible mapping mechanisms, or any preliminary evaluation results, as these are elements of the proposed future work that have not yet been executed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward-looking proposal with no derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is a research proposal that outlines planned steps (problem identification in existing VR controllers, design of a physical prototype with tangible mapping, Likert-scale evaluation in a skating VR game, and market comparison) without presenting any completed empirical results, equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations. No load-bearing claim reduces to its own inputs by construction, as the evaluation and findings are described as future activities rather than asserted outcomes. The text contains no mathematical derivations or renamings of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The document is a high-level research proposal with no mathematical content, fitted parameters, axioms, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5435 in / 1034 out tokens · 27869 ms · 2026-05-10T00:11:04.010152+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Background and literature review

  2. [2]

    Primary research 4.1 Oculus Rift controllers pain points 4.2 HTC Vive controllers pain points 4.3 Lessons learnt

  3. [3]

    Secondary research 5.1 Design process of Oculus Touch

  4. [4]

    Designing from User Testing 6.2

    Designing skating controller 6.1. Designing from User Testing 6.2. Final controller design prototype 6.3. Ergonomic considerations Table of contents

  5. [5]

    Designing game environment

  6. [6]

    Evaluation protocol 8.2

    Usability evaluation 8.1. Evaluation protocol 8.2. Profile of people used for evaluation 8.3. Results

  7. [7]

    User feedback and insights

  8. [8]

    Takeaway for VR Controller designer from this project

  9. [9]

    Conclusion and future works

  10. [10]

    Consent form 13.2

    Forms 13.1. Consent form 13.2. Feedback form 1

  11. [11]

    VR sports can also supplement that, by allowing virtual controls and imaginative gameplay

    Introduction Being a social creature, humans find physical/ tangible interaction and human-to-human presence essential for life [1]. VR sports can also supplement that, by allowing virtual controls and imaginative gameplay. However, present VR based sports is often limited by the lack of tangible interaction. Although considering the advancement of contro...

  12. [12]

    My study builds upon previous contributions in designing motion control devices from the past

    Design Brief The research aim of my design project is to find and analyze the specific interaction challenges which could improve the experience of sports in VR and try to address those by proposing feasible interaction models through working research proto- types. My study builds upon previous contributions in designing motion control devices from the pa...

  13. [13]

    VR is successful as an immersive gaming platform because it creates alternate realities of the environment for players to explore [5,6]

    Background and literature review Playing games in VR has always been more entertaining and delightful activity than playing in static 2D screens. VR is successful as an immersive gaming platform because it creates alternate realities of the environment for players to explore [5,6]. The immersiveness experienced by players is directly related to the ‘play ...

  14. [14]

    The experiences were so engaging that I felt like living in those virtual experiences

    Primary Research As a user, I’ve been fascinated by virtual reality’s user experience since the first time I tried it. The experiences were so engaging that I felt like living in those virtual experiences. My curiosity about this effect is the reason why I go to every VR demo that I can find. The last time I attended Vamrr- Mumbai, I started identifying s...

  15. [15]

    Oculus Touch is one of those controllers which make it possible

    Secondary Research VR is already cool but to make it truly immersive, one not only need to have their head in another world, but the hands too. Oculus Touch is one of those controllers which make it possible. The designing process of Oculus Touch is well documented and a good reference to see before designing a game controller. 5.1. Design process of Ocul...

  16. [16]

    Designing skateboard controller Throughout the development of the controller, I explored how to integrate technology into the human experience of the sport: Skateboarding. 6.1. Designing from User Testing It started with a PC game and a basic VR game with general FPS controls with keyboard and mouse inputs. Students and children were tested with this meth...

  17. [17]

    The player here is a student from IIT Bombay

    Designing game environment The potential of the IDC Run game is to operate as an effective and intuitive tangible VR interface, controlled by the movements of the player. The player here is a student from IIT Bombay. The objective of the game is to reach the department from hostel area as fast as possible by skating on a skateboard, while avoiding obstacl...

  18. [18]

    Nun chuck Bluetooth controller

    Usability evaluation The wearable controller designed was tested for usability and compared with “Nun chuck Bluetooth controller” which is already available in market. Usability study of the controller has been conducted formally with students after, them agreeing to sign the consent form (as per standards) and fill the response form ( Google Form )attach...

  19. [19]

    It was first presented in a public demo booth in HCI conference, Interact 2017

    User Feedback Though, the controller is under significant refinement process, but the assessment is done as per its completion till date. It was first presented in a public demo booth in HCI conference, Interact 2017. The controller was exhibited, near a wide range of other VR game demos. Exceptionally compelling was the level of engagement that players h...

  20. [20]

    Some of it were embedded and some were wearables

    Takeaway for future VR Controller designers the project. Some of it were embedded and some were wearables. The process of deciding the appropriate way to mount electronic sensors / devices to sense useful data, would yield good data required to perform specific task. It can also be considered in broad spectrum of designing where and how the product fits a...

  21. [21]

    in the real world

    Concluding thoughts The physical skateboard controller project has explored an alternative method of interaction with HMDs by creating an artefact capable of providing physical gesture based input and getting real time immersive experience. The potential applications of such technology is widespread and not limited to skateboard game controllers. The emph...

  22. [22]

    Bowlby, J. 1999. Attachment. Attach- ment and Loss. Basic Books, New York

  23. [23]

    Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Kim, W. W. and Patel, D. 2007. Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? And Why? In Paiva, A.C.R, Prada, R. and Picard, R.W. eds, Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume

  24. [24]

    Springer, Berlin. 102-113

  25. [25]

    E., Le Couteur, J

    Lindley, S. E., Le Couteur, J. and Berthouze, N. L. 2008. Stirring up ex- perience through movement in game play: effects on engagement and social behaviour. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05-10, 2008). CHI ’08. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 511-514. DOI= http:// doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.135713

  26. [26]

    Grodal, T. (2000). Video games and the pleasures of control. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertain- ment (pp. 197–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erl- baum

  27. [27]

    Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reali- ty: Dimensions deter- mining telepresence. Journal of Communica- tion, 42(4), 73– 93. doi:10.1111/j.1460- 2466.1992.tb00812.x

  28. [28]

    Vorderer, P. (2001). It’s all entertain- ment—sure. But what exactly is enter- tainment? Communication research, me- dia psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experien- ces. Poetics, 29 (4), 247–261

  29. [29]

    Klimmt, C., & Vorderer, P. (2003). Media psychology ‘‘is not yet there’’: Introducing theories on media entertainment to the presence debate. Presence: Teleopera- tors and Virtual Environments, 12(4), 346– 359

  30. [30]

    Grodal, T. (2000). Video games and the pleasures of control. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment (pp. 197–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

  31. [31]

    Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Frey, A. (2007). Effectance and control as determi- nants of video game enjoyment. CyberPsy - chology & Behavior, 10(6), 845–848. doi:10.1089 /cpb.2007.9942

  32. [32]

    Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Bo ¨cking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., ...Ja ¨ncke, P. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experienc- es. Media Psychol- ogy, 9(3), 493–525

  33. [33]

    McMahan, A. (2003). Immersion, engage- ment and presence. In M. J. P. Wolfe & B. Perron (Eds.), The video game theory reader (pp. 67–86). New York: Routledge

  34. [34]

    Tangible Interaction

    Hornecker, E. Tangible Interaction. Re- trieved September 10 2014, from http:// www.interaction- design.org/ encyclopedia/tangible_interaction.html

  35. [35]

    and Carlson, D

    Jung, B., Schrader, A. and Carlson, D. V

  36. [36]

    In Proceedings of the 2nd In- ternational Conference of the Digital Games Research Association

    Tangible interfaces for pervasive 30 gaming. In Proceedings of the 2nd In- ternational Conference of the Digital Games Research Association. Chang- ing Views: Worlds in Play (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 16-20, 2005)

  37. [37]

    Allwood, J. 2001. Cooperation and Flexibility in Multimodal Communica- tion. Springer Heidelberg, Berlin

  38. [38]

    C., Mazzone, E

    Xu, D., Read, J. C., Mazzone, E. and Brown, M. 2007. Designing and testing a tangible interface prototype. in Pro- ceedings of the 6th International Con- ference on Interaction Design and Children (Aalborg, Denmark, June 6- 8, 2007 ). IDC '07. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25-28. DOI= http:// doi.acm.org/10.1145/1297277.129728 2

  39. [39]

    and Clifton, P

    Mazalek, A., Chandrasekharan, S., Nitsche, M., Welsh, T., Thomas, G., Sanka, T. and Clifton, P. 2009. Giving your self to the game: transferring a player's own movements to avatars using tangible interfaces. In Proceed- ings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Sym- posium on Video Games (New Orle- ans, LA, USA, August 03-07, 2009). Sandbox '09. ACM, New York, NY, US...

  40. [40]

    Krcmar, M., Farrar, K., & McGloin, R. (2011). The effects of video game real- ism on attention, retention and ag- gressive outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 432–439. doi:10.1016/ j.chb.2010.09.005

  41. [41]

    M., & Krcmar, M

    McGloin, R., Farrar, K. M., & Krcmar, M. (2011). The impact of controller natural- ness on spatial presence, gamer enjoy- ment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence: Tele operators and Virtual Environments, 20 (4), 309–324

  42. [42]

    Vorderer, P. (2000). Interactive entertain- ment and beyond. In D. Zillmann & P. Vor- derer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 21–36). Mah- wah, NJ: Erl- baum

  43. [43]

    Persky, S., & Blascovich, J. (2008). Immer- sive virtual video game play and pres- ence: Influences on aggressive feelings and behavior. Presence: Tele operators and Virtual Environ- ments, 17(1), 57–72. doi:10.1162/pres.17.1.57

  44. [44]

    M., Carbonara, C

    Shafer, D. M., Carbonara, C. P., & Popova, L. (2011). Spatial presence and perceived reality as predictors of motion-based vid- eo game enjoyment. Presence: Teleopera- tors and Virtual Environments, 20(6), 591– 619. 31 32 33