pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20772 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🌀 gr-qc · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

General Relativity via differential forms -- explorations in Plebanski's Formalism for GR

Adam Shaw
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc math-phmath.MP
keywords general relativityPlebanski formalismchiral formulations2-formsEinstein equationsnumerical relativityself-dual variables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chiral 2-form variables rewrite Einstein's equations to expose additional structure and support new analytical and numerical tools.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The thesis reformulates general relativity by splitting the Lorentz group into self-dual and anti-self-dual sectors and adopting triples of 2-forms as the fundamental variables in place of the metric. This Plebanski-style approach is used to uncover geometric features inside the Einstein equations that are less visible in standard formulations. The same variables are then applied to linearised equations, nonlinear solutions including black holes, and numerical evolution schemes. If the reformulation preserves the physics of general relativity, it supplies alternative gauge choices and integrators that could simplify both analytic work and simulations of gravitational systems.

Core claim

General relativity can be expressed using Plebanski's formulation in which the basic objects are triples of 2-forms arising as soldering forms on an SO(3,C) bundle; the resulting equations make the chiral structure of the gravitational field explicit and thereby provide new gauge fixings, reveal complex-geometric properties of black hole spacetimes, and yield evolution schemes suitable for numerical implementation.

What carries the argument

Plebanski's 2-form variables, which replace the spacetime metric and encode gravity through the self-dual and anti-self-dual decomposition on an SO(3,C) bundle.

If this is right

  • Linearised Einstein equations acquire new gauge conditions adapted to the chiral variables.
  • Nonlinear black hole geometries display underlying complex structure accessible through the 2-form formulation.
  • Numerical relativity gains evolution schemes built directly from the chiral 2-forms and their associated gauge choices.
  • Analytical techniques become available that exploit the extra structure now visible inside the Einstein equations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be tested by comparing the stability of 2-form-based simulations against metric-based ones for strong-field sources.
  • If equivalence holds, the same variables might be carried over to modified gravity theories that admit a similar chiral splitting.
  • The fibre-bundle construction suggests possible links between gravitational constraints and those appearing in gauge theories.

Load-bearing premise

The chiral splitting into self-dual and anti-self-dual sectors together with the 2-form variables can be applied consistently from linearised equations through nonlinear regimes and numerical codes without discarding essential physical content or adding uncontrolled artifacts.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that the 2-form equations fail to reproduce a known exact solution such as the Schwarzschild metric, or a numerical run that produces gravitational-wave signals differing from those obtained with standard metric-based codes for identical initial data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20772 by Adam Shaw.

Figure 10.1
Figure 10.1. Figure 10.1: Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p152_10_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11.1
Figure 11.1. Figure 11.1: In (a) we compare the L1 norm, which is defined as ||u||1 = 1 N PN i |ui | where | · | is the absolute value and the index i runs over all the grid points and components in u (which is denoted as N), of the difference between the numerical solution and the Minkowski solution for N = 20, 40, 80 for the top, middle and bottom lines respectively. The error in the solution decreases as the number of points,… view at source ↗
Figure 11.2
Figure 11.2. Figure 11.2: Plot (a) is the same as fig. 11.1b but for a longer simulation time. In (b) we plot the L1 norm for the sum of the absolute values of all the constraints for the damped and undamped system. In (c) we plot the L1 norm of the imaginary part of the metric for both systems. There are two important properties that need to be checked, the constraints and the reality conditions. In fig. 11.2b we see that both … view at source ↗
Figure 12.1
Figure 12.1. Figure 12.1: Error in the reality conditions, eq. (12.25), versus time, for the chiral maxwell evolution system eqs. (12.20) to (12.23). It can be seen that the reality condition remains bounded and oscillates below a certain value. The reality conditions for GR we expect to handle similarly, by gauge fixing the full system in such a way that the constraints are handled. Below we will see that the action eq. (12.6) … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This thesis studies general relativity (GR) using chiral formulations, which take advantage of the decomposition of the four-dimensional Lorentz group into self-dual and anti-self-dual sectors. Within this framework, GR can be expressed using Plebanski's formulation, where the basic variables are triples of 2-forms rather than a metric, or alternatively through pure connection approaches. These viewpoints expose additional structure in Einstein's equations (EEs) and offer new analytical and numerical tools. Part I develops the geometric foundations using fibre bundles, where the 2-forms arise as soldering forms on an SO(3,C) bundle. Part II investigates the linearised form of EEs in the chiral setting, with particular attention to their gauge fixings. Part III extends this analysis to the nonlinear regime, and also examines the complex-geometric structure underlying black hole spacetimes. The final part turns to numerical relativity, exploring evolution schemes built from the chiral formulations and their associated gauge choices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This thesis explores general relativity through chiral formulations based on Plebanski's approach, reformulating the theory in terms of triples of 2-forms rather than a metric. Part I develops the geometric foundations using fibre bundles and SO(3,C) structures where the 2-forms arise as soldering forms. Part II examines the linearised Einstein equations in this setting with attention to gauge fixings. Part III extends the analysis to the nonlinear regime and studies the complex-geometric structure of black hole spacetimes. The final part investigates numerical evolution schemes constructed from the chiral formulations and associated gauges. The central claim is that these viewpoints expose additional structure in Einstein's equations and supply new analytical and numerical tools.

Significance. If the consistency of the self-dual/anti-self-dual decomposition holds across regimes, the work offers a coherent geometric reformulation that could provide useful alternative perspectives on GR. The explicit use of differential forms and fibre-bundle language is a strength, as is the progression from foundations through linearised and nonlinear regimes to numerical schemes. As an exploratory thesis that summarises and develops known chiral splittings rather than isolating a single new theorem or benchmarked result, its significance lies primarily in opening avenues for future analytical and numerical applications rather than in immediate resolution of open problems.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Part I] Part I: the definition and properties of the soldering forms on the SO(3,C) bundle would benefit from an explicit low-dimensional example or diagram to clarify the transition from the Lorentz group decomposition to the 2-form variables.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the distinction between review material on Plebanski's formalism and the thesis's own contributions to numerical schemes could be sharpened to help readers identify the novel elements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the thesis and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report, so we address the overall evaluation below and note that the manuscript requires no changes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; exploratory reformulation of known GR

full rationale

The thesis is an exploratory reformulation of Einstein's equations in Plebanski's chiral 2-form formalism using standard fibre-bundle geometry and the known self-dual/anti-self-dual decomposition of the Lorentz group. Part I builds geometric foundations from established soldering forms on SO(3,C) bundles; Part II linearises the equations with conventional gauge fixing; Part III extends to nonlinear regimes and black-hole complex geometry; the final part constructs numerical schemes. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or self-citation chain; all content rests on independent differential-geometric identities and prior literature external to the present work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated. The work relies on standard differential geometry and the known self-dual/anti-self-dual decomposition of the Lorentz group.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The four-dimensional Lorentz group admits a decomposition into self-dual and anti-self-dual sectors that can be used to formulate GR.
    Invoked throughout the chiral formulation described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5463 in / 1222 out tokens · 48443 ms · 2026-05-09T23:33:01.524310+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 128 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Annalen der Physik , year = 1916, volume = 354, pages =

    A. Einstein. “Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativit¨ atstheorie”. en. In:Annalen der Physik354 (7 Jan. 1916), pp. 769–822.doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19163540702 1916

  2. [2]

    Feldgleichungen der Gravitation

    Albert Einstein. “Feldgleichungen der Gravitation”. In:Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften Sitzungsberichte (1915), pp. 844–847

    1915

  3. [3]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration. “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)(Feb. 2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. arXiv:1602.03837v1 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  4. [4]

    P., et al

    B. P. Abbott et al. “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Merg- ers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs”. In:Physical Review X9 (3 Sept. 2019).doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  5. [5]

    The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

    Clifford M. Will. “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment”. In:Living Reviews in Relativity9.1 (Mar. 2006).issn: 1433-8351.doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 2006

  6. [6]

    The Four-Dimensionality of Space and the Einstein Tensor

    David Lovelock. “The Four-Dimensionality of Space and the Einstein Tensor”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics13 (6 June 1972), pp. 874–876.doi:10.1063/1.1666069

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1666069 1972

  7. [7]

    Die Grundlagen der Physik . (Erste Mitteilung.)

    D. Hilbert. “Die Grundlagen der Physik . (Erste Mitteilung.)” In:Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G¨ ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse1915 (1915), pp. 395–408. url:http://eudml.org/doc/58946

    1915

  8. [8]

    Carroll.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity

    Sean M. Carroll.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019

    2019

  9. [9]

    CRC Press, Oct

    Mikio Nakahara.Geometry, Topology and Physics. CRC Press, Oct. 2018.isbn: 9781315275826. doi:10.1201/9781315275826

    work page doi:10.1201/9781315275826 2018

  10. [10]

    Notes on Spinors and Polyforms I: General Case

    Niren Bhoja and Kirill Krasnov. “Notes on Spinors and Polyforms I: General Case”. In:arXiv (May 2022). arXiv:2205.04866v1 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    The Classification of Spaces Defining Gravitational Fields

    A. Z. Petrov. “The Classification of Spaces Defining Gravitational Fields”. In:General Relativity and Gravitation32 (8 Aug. 2000), pp. 1665–1685.doi:10.1023/a:1001910908054

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1001910908054 2000

  12. [12]

    An Approach to Gravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients

    Ezra Newman and Roger Penrose. “An Approach to Gravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics3 (3 May 1962), pp. 566–578.doi:10.1063/ 1.1724257

    1962

  13. [13]

    A Complex Vectorial Formalism in General Relativity

    M. Cahen, R. Debever, and L. Defrise. “A Complex Vectorial Formalism in General Relativity”. In:Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics16.7 (1967), pp. 761–785.issn: 00959057, 19435274

    1967

  14. [14]

    Aspects of Spinorial G Structures

    Niren Bhoja. “Aspects of Spinorial G Structures”. PhD thesis. Nottingham U., Dec. 2024.url: https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/80011

    2024

  15. [15]

    Four-dimensional Riemannian geometry via 2-forms

    Niren Bhoja and Kirill Krasnov. “SU(2) structures in four dimensions and Plebanski formalism for GR”. In:arXiv(May 2024). arXiv:2405.15408v1 [math.DG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Lorentzian Cayley Form

    Kirill Krasnov. “Lorentzian Cayley Form”. In:arXiv(Apr. 2023). arXiv:2304.01118v1 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Ashtekar, New Variables for Classical and Quan- tum Gravity, Phys

    Abhay Ashtekar. “New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity”. In:Physical Review Letters 57 (18 Nov. 1986), pp. 2244–2247.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2244. 201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.57.2244 1986

  18. [18]

    S(4,C) Ashtekar-Barbero gravity and the Immirzi parameter

    S Alexandrov. “S(4,C) Ashtekar-Barbero gravity and the Immirzi parameter”. In:Classical and Quantum Gravity17 (20 Oct. 2000), pp. 4255–4268.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/307

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/307 2000

  19. [19]

    On the separation of Einsteinian substructures

    Jerzy F. Pleba´ nski. “On the separation of Einsteinian substructures”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics18 (12 Dec. 1977), pp. 2511–2520.doi:10.1063/1.523215

    work page doi:10.1063/1.523215 1977

  20. [20]

    Andersson and G

    Mariano Celada, Diego Gonz´ alez, and Merced Montesinos. “BFgravity”. In:Classical and Quan- tum Gravity33.21 (Oct. 2016), p. 213001.issn: 1361-6382.doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/33/21/ 213001

    work page doi:10.1088/0264- 2016

  21. [21]

    A pure spin-connection formulation of gravity

    R Capovilla, J Dell, and T Jacobson. “A pure spin-connection formulation of gravity”. In:Classical and Quantum Gravity8 (1 Jan. 1991), pp. 59–73.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/1/010

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/1/010 1991

  22. [22]

    Pure Connection Action Principle for General Relativity

    Kirill Krasnov. “Pure Connection Action Principle for General Relativity”. In:Physical Review Letters106 (25 June 2011).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.251103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.251103 2011

  23. [23]

    Renormalizable Non-Metric Quantum Gravity?

    Kirill Krasnov. “Renormalizable Non-Metric Quantum Gravity?” In:arXiv(Nov. 2006). arXiv: hep-th/0611182v2 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Will.Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics

    Clifford M. Will.Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, Sept. 2018.isbn: 9781316338612.doi:10.1017/9781316338612

    work page doi:10.1017/9781316338612 2018

  25. [25]

    Motion of Small Objects in Curved Spacetimes: An Introduction to Gravitational Self-Force

    Adam Pound. “Motion of Small Objects in Curved Spacetimes: An Introduction to Gravitational Self-Force”. In:Equations of Motion in Relativistic Gravity. Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 399–486.isbn: 9783319183350.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18335-0_13

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18335-0_13 2015

  26. [26]

    Chiral perturbation theory for GR

    Kirill Krasnov and Yuri Shtanov. “Chiral perturbation theory for GR”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2020 (9 Sept. 2020).doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)017

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)017 2020

  27. [27]

    Pure connection formalism and Plebanski’s second heavenly equation

    Kirill Krasnov and Arthur Lipstein. “Pure connection formalism and Plebanski’s second heavenly equation”. In:arXiv(Dec. 2024). arXiv:2412.15779v1 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, C

    Roy P. Kerr. “Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics”. In:Physical Review Letters11 (5 Sept. 1963), pp. 237–238.doi:10.1103/physrevlett. 11.237

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 1963

  29. [29]

    Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems

    S Chandrasekhar.The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes. Oxford University PressOxford, Sept. 1998.isbn: 9780198503705.doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503705.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503705.001.0001 1998

  30. [30]

    Self-dual K¨ ahler manifolds and Einstein manifolds of dimension four

    Andrzej Derdzinski. “Self-dual K¨ ahler manifolds and Einstein manifolds of dimension four”. In: Compositio Mathematica49 (1983), pp. 405–433

    1983

  31. [31]

    On the formation of singularities in the curve shortening flow , volume =

    Claude LeBrun. “Explicit self-dual metrics onCP 2#· · ·#CP 2”. In:Journal of Differential Ge- ometry34.1 (Jan. 1991).issn: 0022-040X.doi:10.4310/jdg/1214446999

    work page doi:10.4310/jdg/1214446999 1991

  32. [32]

    Basic concepts in finite differencing of partial differential equations

    L. Smarr. “Basic concepts in finite differencing of partial differential equations”. In:Workshop on Sources of Gravitational Radiation. 1979, pp. 139–159

    1979

  33. [33]

    2013 , PAGES =

    Miguel Alcubierre.Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity. Oxford University Press, Apr. 2008. isbn: 9780199205677.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205677.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205677.001.0001 2008

  34. [34]

    Baumgarte and Stuart L

    Thomas W. Baumgarte and Stuart L. Shapiro.Numerical Relativity. Cambridge University Press, June 2010.isbn: 9780521514071.doi:10.1017/cbo9781139193344

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139193344 2010

  35. [35]

    Dover Books on Physics

    Paul Dirac.Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Dover Books on Physics. Mineola, NY: Dover Pub- lications, Mar. 2001

    2001

  36. [36]

    Note on the propagation of the constraints in standard 3+1 general relativ- ity

    Simonetta Frittelli. “Note on the propagation of the constraints in standard 3+1 general relativ- ity”. en. In:Physical Review D55 (10 May 1997), pp. 5992–5996.doi:10.1103/physrevd.55. 5992

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.55 1997

  37. [37]

    Evolution of the constraint equations in general relativity

    Steven Detweiler. “Evolution of the constraint equations in general relativity”. en. In:Physical Review D35 (4 Feb. 1987), pp. 1095–1099.doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.1095

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.1095 1987

  38. [38]

    Three-dimensional numerical relativity: The evolution of black holes

    Peter Anninos et al. “Three-dimensional numerical relativity: The evolution of black holes”. en. In:Physical Review D52 (4 Aug. 1995), pp. 2059–2082.doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.2059

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.2059 1995

  39. [39]

    Gerhard Wanner Ernst Hairer Christian Lubich.Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure- Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations. en. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics (Book 31). Springer, 2010.isbn: 9783642051579; 364205157X

    2010

  40. [40]

    Discrete Exterior Calculus

    Mathieu Desbrun et al. “Discrete Exterior Calculus”. In:arXiv(Aug. 2005). arXiv:math / 0508341v2 [math.DG]

    2005

  41. [41]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    Ronny Richter and Christian Lubich. “Free and constrained symplectic integrators for numerical general relativity”. In:Class.Quant.Grav.25:225018,2008(July 2008).doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 25/22/225018. arXiv:0807.0734v2 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 2008

  42. [42]

    Constructing of constraint preserving scheme for Einstein equations

    Takuya Tsuchiya and Gen Yoneda. “Constructing of constraint preserving scheme for Einstein equations”. In:JSIAM Letters Vol. 9 (2017) p. 57-60(Oct. 2016).doi:10.14495/jsiaml.9.57. arXiv:1610.04543v3 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.14495/jsiaml.9.57 2017

  43. [43]

    Numerical Relativity from a Gauge Theory Perspective

    Will M. Farr. “Numerical Relativity from a Gauge Theory Perspective”. In:Bulletin of the Amer- ican Physical Society(2010).url:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/62871

    2010

  44. [44]

    A short review of loop quantum gravity

    Abhay Ashtekar and Eugenio Bianchi. “A short review of loop quantum gravity”. In:Reports on Progress in Physics84.4 (Mar. 2021), p. 042001.issn: 1361-6633.doi:10 . 1088 / 1361 - 6633/abed91

    2021

  45. [45]

    Finite element exterior calculus: from Hodge theory to numerical stability

    Douglas Arnold, Richard Falk, and Ragnar Winther. “Finite element exterior calculus: from Hodge theory to numerical stability”. In:Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society47.2 (Jan. 2010), pp. 281–354.issn: 1088-9485.doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-10-01278-4

    work page doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-10-01278-4 2010

  46. [46]

    Gauge conditions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions without excision

    Miguel Alcubierre et al. “Gauge conditions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions without excision”. In:Physical Review D67 (8 Apr. 2003).doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.084023

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.084023 2003

  47. [47]

    Hyperbolicity of the 3 + 1system of Einstein equations

    Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat and Tommaso Ruggeri. “Hyperbolicity of the 3 + 1system of Einstein equations”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics89.2 (1983), pp. 269–275

    1983

  48. [48]

    Hyperbolic Methods for Einstein’s Equations

    Oscar A. Reula. “Hyperbolic Methods for Einstein’s Equations”. en. In:Living Reviews in Rela- tivity1 (1 Dec. 1998).doi:10.12942/lrr-1998-3

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-1998-3 1998

  49. [49]

    Plebanski complex

    Kirill Krasnov and Adam Shaw. “Plebanski complex”. In:arXiv(Feb. 2025). arXiv:2502.19027v1 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead,

    Kirill Krasnov and Adam Shaw. “Kerr metric from two commuting complex structures”. In: Classical and Quantum Gravity42.6 (Mar. 2025), p. 065013.issn: 1361-6382.doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/adb531

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2025

  51. [51]

    Ambitoric geometry I: Einstein metrics and extremal ambikaehler structures

    Vestislav Apostolov, David M. J. Calderbank, and Paul Gauduchon. “Ambitoric geometry I: Einstein metrics and extremal ambikaehler structures”. In:arXiv(Feb. 2013). J. reine angew. Math. 721 (2016) 109-147. arXiv:1302.6975v1 [math.DG]

    work page arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Weyl curvature evolution system for GR

    Kirill Krasnov and Adam Shaw. “Weyl curvature evolution system for GR”. In:Classical and Quantum Gravity40.7 (Mar. 2023), p. 075013.issn: 1361-6382.doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acc0cc

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acc0cc 2023

  53. [53]

    Wiley Classics Library

    Shoshichi Kobayashi and Katsumi Nomizu.Foundations of differential geometry, volume 1. Wiley Classics Library. Nashville, TN: John Wiley & Sons, Mar. 1996

    1996

  54. [54]

    Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics

    Kirill Krasnov.Formulations of general relativity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, Nov. 2020

    2020

  55. [55]

    Sur les ´ equations de la gravitation d’Einstein

    E. Cartan. “Sur les ´ equations de la gravitation d’Einstein”. Fr. In:Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees9e s´ erie, 1 (1922), pp. 141–203

    1922

  56. [56]

    Sur une g´ en´ eralisation de la notion de courbure de Riemann et les espaces ` a torsion

    E. Cartan. “Sur une g´ en´ eralisation de la notion de courbure de Riemann et les espaces ` a torsion.” Fr. In:C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris174 (1922), pp. 593–595.issn: 0001-4036

    1922

  57. [57]

    The geometry ofG-structures

    S. S. Chern. “The geometry ofG-structures”. In:Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 72 (2 Mar. 1966), pp. 167–220.doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1966-11473-8

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1966-11473-8 1966

  58. [58]

    K. B. Marathe and Giovanni Martucci.The Mathematical Foundations of Gauge Theories (Studies in Mathematical Physics). North-Holland, 1992.isbn: 9780444897084

    1992

  59. [60]

    Misner et al.Gravitation

    Charles W. Misner et al.Gravitation. 2018

    2018

  60. [61]

    First order gravity on the light front

    Sergei Alexandrov and Simone Speziale. “First order gravity on the light front”. In:Phys. Rev. D 91, 064043 (2015)(Dec. 2014).doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 91 . 064043. arXiv:1412 . 6057v2 [gr-qc]

    2015

  61. [62]

    Actions for Gravity, with Generalizations: A Review

    Peter Peldan. “Actions for Gravity, with Generalizations: A Review”. In:Class.Quant.Grav.11:1087- 1132,1994(May 1993).doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/003. arXiv:gr-qc/9305011v1 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/003 1994

  62. [63]

    A spinor approach to general relativity.Ann

    Roger Penrose. “A spinor approach to general relativity”. In:Annals of Physics10 (2 June 1960), pp. 171–201.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(60)90021-x

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(60)90021-x 1960

  63. [64]

    Self-Duality in Four-Dimensional Riemannian Geometry

    M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, and I. M. Singer. “Self-Duality in Four-Dimensional Riemannian Geometry”. In:Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences362.1711 (1978), pp. 425–461.issn: 00804630

    1978

  64. [65]

    Complex structures and representations of the Einstein equations

    Carl H. Brans. “Complex structures and representations of the Einstein equations”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics15 (9 Sept. 1974), pp. 1559–1566.doi:10.1063/1.1666847

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1666847 1974

  65. [66]

    Modified gravity without new degrees of freedom

    Laurent Freidel. “Modified gravity without new degrees of freedom”. In:arXiv(Dec. 2008). arXiv: 0812.3200v1 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2008

  66. [67]

    On integrability properties of SU (2) Yang–Mills fields. I. Infinitesimal part

    H. Urbantke. “On integrability properties of SU (2) Yang–Mills fields. I. Infinitesimal part”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics25 (7 July 1984), pp. 2321–2324.doi:10.1063/1.526402

    work page doi:10.1063/1.526402 1984

  67. [68]

    Cam- bridge University Press, Nov

    Kirill Krasnov.Formulations of General Relativity, Gravity, Spinors and Differential Forms. Cam- bridge University Press, Nov. 2020, pp. 1–7.doi:10.1017/9781108674652.002

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108674652.002 2020

  68. [69]

    Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle

    G. ’t Hooft. “Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle”. In: Physical Review D14 (12 Dec. 1976), pp. 3432–3450.doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3432 1976

  69. [70]

    Topological field theory

    D Birmingham. “Topological field theory”. In:Physics Reports209 (Dec. 1991), pp. 129–340.doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90117-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90117-5 1991

  70. [71]

    Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action

    S¨ oren Holst. “Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action”. In:Phys- ical Review D53.10 (May 1996), pp. 5966–5969.issn: 1089-4918.doi:10.1103/physrevd.53. 5966

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.53 1996

  71. [72]

    General relativity without the metric

    Riccardo Capovilla, Ted Jacobson, and John Dell. “General relativity without the metric”. In: Physical Review Letters63 (21 Nov. 1989), pp. 2325–2328.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.2325

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.2325 1989

  72. [73]

    A gauge-theoretic approach to gravity

    Kirill Krasnov. “A gauge-theoretic approach to gravity”. In:Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences468.2144 (Mar. 2012), pp. 2129–2173.issn: 1471-2946.doi:10.1098/rspa.2011.0638

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2011.0638 2012

  73. [74]

    Chalmers, W

    G. Chalmers and W. Siegel. “The self-dual sector of QCD amplitudes”. In:Phys.Rev. D54 (1996) 7628-7633(June 1996).doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.7628. arXiv:hep-th/9606061v1 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.7628 1996

  74. [75]

    Self-Dual Yang-Mills Theory, Integrability and Multiparton Amplitudes

    William A. Bardeen. “Self-Dual Yang-Mills Theory, Integrability and Multiparton Amplitudes”. In:Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement123 (1996), pp. 1–8.doi:10.1143/ptps.123.1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.123.1 1996

  75. [76]

    From 2D integrable systems to self-dual gravity

    M Dunajski, L J Mason, and N M J Woodhouse. “From 2D integrable systems to self-dual gravity”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31 (28 July 1998), pp. 6019–6028. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/28/015

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/28/015 1998

  76. [77]

    One-loop self-dual and N = 4 super Yang-Mills

    Zvi Bern et al. “One-loop self-dual and N = 4 super Yang-Mills”. In:Physics Letters B394 (1-2 Feb. 1997), pp. 105–115.doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01676-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01676-0 1997

  77. [78]

    One-loop n-gluon amplitudes with maximal helicity violation via collinear limits

    Zvi Bern et al. “One-loop n-gluon amplitudes with maximal helicity violation via collinear limits”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (14 Apr. 1994), pp. 2134–2137.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2134

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.2134 1994

  78. [79]

    One-loop n-point helicity amplitudes in (self-dual) gravity

    Z. Bern et al. “One-loop n-point helicity amplitudes in (self-dual) gravity”. In:Physics Letters B 444 (3-4 Dec. 1998), pp. 273–283.doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)01397-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)01397-5 1998

  79. [80]

    Multi-leg one-loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory

    Z. Bern et al. “Multi-leg one-loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory”. In:Nuclear Physics B 546 (1-2 Apr. 1999), pp. 423–479.doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00029-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00029-2 1999

  80. [81]

    Self-Dual Gravity

    Kirill Krasnov. “Self-Dual Gravity”. In:Class. Quantum Grav. 34 095001, 2017(Oct. 2016).doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/aa65e5. arXiv:1610.01457v2 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa65e5 2017

Showing first 80 references.