pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20974 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Element-deletion-enhanced digital image correlation for automated crack detection and tracking in lattice materials

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords digital image correlationlattice materialscrack detectionelement deletionarchitected materialsdamage trackingdisplacement measurementmode I fracture
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A digital image correlation method adapted for lattice structures uses element deletion to automatically detect and track cracks during failure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a global digital image correlation technique that operates directly on the mesh of lattice materials instead of assuming a continuous solid. Damaged elements are identified and removed using a data-driven residual criterion as the analysis proceeds. The approach resolves highly localized deformations around slender beams and the formation of discontinuities during cracking. It matters because standard optical methods fail for these discrete architectures, limiting insight into how cracks initiate and grow in materials designed for high toughness. Validation on 3D-printed triangular lattices under mode-I loading shows it captures both initiation and propagation accurately while providing an estimate of critical failure strain.

Core claim

The method solves the correlation problem on the lattice mesh and automatically removes damaged elements during the analyses based on a residual criterion, enabling physically consistent displacement field measurements on the evolving intact lattice topology and resolving the crack path over time.

What carries the argument

Element-deletion-enhanced global DIC framework solved directly on the lattice mesh with a data-driven residual criterion for damage detection.

Load-bearing premise

The data-driven residual criterion reliably identifies truly damaged elements without introducing false positives or negatives that would distort the displacement field or crack path on the evolving mesh.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that the automatically detected crack path deviates from the actual failure path observed through independent high-resolution imaging or sectioning of the tested lattice would falsify the accuracy of the method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20974 by Alessandra Lingua, Arturo Chao Correas, David S. Kammer, Fran\c{c}ois Hild.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Compact tension specimen design with triangular equilateral cell topology and lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Full-field measurements over the lattice mesh during crack propagation up to the end [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Analysis of the maximum residual variation to identify a threshold that distinguishes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: End-of-test ρ and ε1 fields for the lattice-based mesh with integrated element deletion based on ∆ρth = 7.3 gl. The damaged element deletion yields a significant reduction in the residuals (a) and local deformations (b) maxima compared with the values obtained via an analysis undertaken without element deletion ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Damaged elements identified using the residual-based criterion and the average critical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of global DIC residuals with and without element deletion and estimated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Strain field at the end of test for a specimen with imperfections in the form of missing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Strain-threshold identification from the critical deformations of elements removed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: End-of-test ρ and ε1 fields by DIC with integrated element deletion based on the threshold εth = 1.2. The damaged element deletion yields a reduction in the residuals (a) and local deformations (b) maxima compared with the analysis without element deletion ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of RMS residuals and evolution of the number of broken struts found [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Evolution of the crack-tip position as a function of frame number measured using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Analysis of the impact of the strain threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Architected materials can exhibit remarkable combinations of stiffness, strength, and toughness, yet their application is currently limited by an incomplete understanding of how cracks initiate and propagate through their discrete architecture. Elucidating the mechanisms that underpin these processes is challenging because lattice failure is governed by highly localized deformations of slender beams, which fall outside the resolution and assumptions of optical methods developed for continuum solids, such as digital image correlation (DIC). Thus, characterizing crack propagation within lattice materials requires measurement strategies capable of resolving lattice-scale deformations while accounting for both the intrinsic discreteness of lattice architectures and the progressive formation of material discontinuities during failure. This work introduces a global DIC framework tailored to architected materials, in which the correlation problem is solved directly on the lattice mesh and damaged elements are automatically removed during the analyses. Damage detection, which relies on a data-driven residual criterion, enables the robust tracking of localized deformation and crack-tip motion under different testing conditions. The method provides physically consistent displacement field measurements on the evolving intact lattice topology and resolves the crack path over time. Validations on 3D-printed regular and imperfect triangular lattices under mode-I loading demonstrate that the approach accurately captures both damage initiation and crack propagation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that identifying damaged elements provides an estimate of the critical failure strain, which can be used directly in numerical models or adopted as an alternative element-deletion threshold in DIC analyses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a global DIC framework for architected lattice materials that solves the correlation problem directly on the lattice mesh and automatically deletes damaged elements during analysis using a data-driven residual criterion. This enables physically consistent displacement measurements on the evolving intact topology and tracking of crack-tip motion. Validations on 3D-printed regular and imperfect triangular lattices under mode-I loading are presented to demonstrate accurate capture of damage initiation and propagation, along with an estimate of critical failure strain for use in numerical models.

Significance. If the validations hold, the work would provide a useful experimental tool for resolving lattice-scale deformations and progressive failure in discrete architected materials, where standard continuum DIC methods are limited by assumptions of continuity. The element-deletion approach could improve fidelity of measured fields and facilitate direct comparison to simulations, addressing a key gap in characterizing toughness and crack paths in lattices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the method 'accurately captures both damage initiation and crack propagation' depends on the data-driven residual criterion reliably identifying physical beam ruptures. However, no independent ground-truth validation (such as post-test microscopy, acoustic emission, or comparison to FE models with prescribed fracture locations) is described to rule out systematic bias from false positives/negatives that could distort the tracked crack path.
  2. [Methods] Methods (residual criterion description): The residual threshold is a free parameter whose selection and sensitivity are not detailed; because it is derived from the same correlation residuals used for displacement computation, this risks circularity where the criterion reinforces assumed failure modes rather than reflecting independent physical evidence.
  3. [Validation results] Validation results: Quantitative support is limited; the abstract and described experiments lack error bars on displacement fields, metrics for crack-path accuracy versus visual or alternative measurements, or direct comparisons to standard DIC on the same specimens, leaving the strength of the accuracy claim only moderately defensible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'Different testing conditions' are referenced but only mode-I loading on triangular lattices is specified in the validation summary; clarify the range of conditions actually demonstrated.
  2. [Notation] Notation: Ensure the term 'data-driven residual criterion' is defined consistently and distinguished from any post-hoc tuning steps when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation and address concerns about validation and quantitative support.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the method 'accurately captures both damage initiation and crack propagation' depends on the data-driven residual criterion reliably identifying physical beam ruptures. However, no independent ground-truth validation (such as post-test microscopy, acoustic emission, or comparison to FE models with prescribed fracture locations) is described to rule out systematic bias from false positives/negatives that could distort the tracked crack path.

    Authors: We agree that independent ground-truth would further bolster the claim. The current validations rely on consistency between detected damage locations and direct visual observation of beam ruptures in the 3D-printed specimens under mode-I loading, as well as agreement with expected crack paths in both regular and imperfect triangular lattices. In the revised manuscript we will expand the validation section to include explicit post-test photographic comparison of the final crack paths against the element-deletion history, thereby providing additional visual corroboration. Acoustic emission and prescribed-fracture FE comparisons were outside the scope of this methods-focused study but will be noted as valuable directions for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (residual criterion description): The residual threshold is a free parameter whose selection and sensitivity are not detailed; because it is derived from the same correlation residuals used for displacement computation, this risks circularity where the criterion reinforces assumed failure modes rather than reflecting independent physical evidence.

    Authors: The threshold is chosen from the statistical distribution of residuals computed on the initial intact topology in regions that remain undamaged throughout the test; elements whose residuals exceed this value are then removed, allowing the correlation to be re-solved on the updated mesh. This is not circular because the residual is evaluated under the assumption of an intact element; a large residual signals that the assumption has been violated by physical rupture. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the referee’s concern and will add a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section detailing the exact percentile-based selection procedure together with a sensitivity study showing that moderate variations in the threshold produce only minor changes in the tracked crack path and critical strain estimate. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Validation results] Validation results: Quantitative support is limited; the abstract and described experiments lack error bars on displacement fields, metrics for crack-path accuracy versus visual or alternative measurements, or direct comparisons to standard DIC on the same specimens, leaving the strength of the accuracy claim only moderately defensible.

    Authors: We will augment the results section with error bars on the reported displacement components (derived from the covariance of the global correlation solution) and will introduce a quantitative crack-path metric: the average Euclidean distance between the automatically detected crack front and a manually traced reference path obtained from high-resolution images at selected load steps. Direct side-by-side application of continuum DIC on the same lattice specimens is inherently limited by the continuity assumption that our method is designed to relax; we will nevertheless add a brief qualitative discussion and example illustrating the artifacts that arise when standard DIC is applied across broken beams. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; method relies on external experimental validation

full rationale

The paper presents a DIC framework solved on lattice meshes with element deletion driven by a residual-based criterion. Central claims of accurate crack detection and propagation tracking rest on direct validations against physical 3D-printed lattice specimens under mode-I loading, which constitute independent external data rather than fitted inputs or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are shown to reduce outputs to inputs by construction; the derivation chain remains self-contained against the reported experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard DIC assumptions adapted to discrete meshes plus a data-driven residual threshold whose exact form and fitting procedure are not specified in the abstract; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • residual threshold for element deletion
    The data-driven residual criterion requires a cutoff value to decide when an element is damaged; this is not derived from first principles and must be chosen or fitted.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The lattice mesh accurately represents the physical geometry and connectivity throughout loading until damage occurs.
    Invoked when solving the correlation directly on the mesh and deleting elements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5564 in / 1275 out tokens · 22524 ms · 2026-05-09T22:42:18.156527+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mechanical metamaterials and beyond.Nature Communications, 14:69–80, 2023

    Jiao Pengcheng, Mueller Jochen, Raney Jordan R., Zheng Xiaoyu, and Alavi Amir H. Mechanical metamaterials and beyond.Nature Communications, 14:69–80, 2023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41679-8. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41679-8

  2. [2]

    Modulate stress distribution with bio-inspired irregular architected materials towards optimal tissue support.Nature Communications,

    Zhang Xiaojia Shelly Jia Yingqi, Liu Ke. Modulate stress distribution with bio-inspired irregular architected materials towards optimal tissue support.Nature Communications,

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47831-2

  4. [4]

    Engineering the crack path in lattice cellular materials through bio-inspired micro-structural alterations.Extreme Mechanics Letters, 26:8–17, 2019-01

    Riccardo Manno, Wei Gao, and Ivano Benedetti. Engineering the crack path in lattice cellular materials through bio-inspired micro-structural alterations.Extreme Mechanics Letters, 26:8–17, 2019-01. ISSN 23524316. doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2018.11.002. URLhttps: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352431618301627

  5. [5]

    Design and fabrication of architected multi-material lattices with tunable stiffness, strength, and energy absorption

    Denizhan Yavas, Qingyang Liu, Ziyang Zhang, and Dazhong Wu. Design and fabrication of architected multi-material lattices with tunable stiffness, strength, and energy absorption. Materials & Design, 217:110613, 2022. ISSN 0264-1275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.matdes.2022.110613. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0264127522002349

  6. [6]

    Acoustic and mechanical metamate- rials for energy harvesting and self-powered sensing applications.Materials Today Energy, 37:101387, 2023

    Geon Lee, Seong-Jin Lee, Junsuk Rho, and Miso Kim. Acoustic and mechanical metamate- rials for energy harvesting and self-powered sensing applications.Materials Today Energy, 37:101387, 2023. ISSN 2468-6069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2023.101387. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468606923001430

  7. [7]

    U.et al.Mechanical Metamaterials and Their Engineering Applications.Adv

    James Utama Surjadi, Libo Gao, Huifeng Du, Xiang Li, Xiang Xiong, Nicholas Xu- anlai Fang, and Yang Lu. Mechanical metamaterials and their engineering applica- tions.Advanced Engineering Materials, 21(3):1800864, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1002/adem.201800864. URLhttps://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/ 10.1002/adem.201800864. 24

  8. [8]

    Montemayor Lauren, Chernow Victoria

    Greer Julia R. Montemayor Lauren, Chernow Victoria. Materials by design: Using archi- tecture in material design to reach new property spaces.MRS Bulletin, 40, 2015. ISSN 1938-1425

  9. [9]

    The toughness of mechanical metamaterials.Nature Materials, 21(3):297–304, 2022

    Angkur Jyoti Dipanka Shaikeea, Huachen Cui, Mark O’Masta, Xiaoyu Rayne Zheng, and Vikram Sudhir Deshpande. The toughness of mechanical metamaterials.Nature Materials, 21(3):297–304, 2022. ISSN 1476-1122, 1476-4660. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01182-1. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-021-01182-1

  10. [10]

    Capturing the impact of economic forces on the dry bulk freight market.Maritime Transport Research, 2:100018, 2021

    Elliott W. Jost, David G. Moore, and Christopher Saldana. Evolution of global and local deformation in additively manufactured octet truss lattice structures.Additive Manufacturing Letters, 1:100010, 2021. ISSN 2772-3690. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.addlet.2021.100010. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2772369021000104

  11. [11]

    Kochmann

    Kaoutar Radi, Fabian Allamand, and Dennis M. Kochmann. Deformation tracking of truss lattices under dynamic loading based on digital image correlation.Mechanics of Materials, 183:104658, 2023. ISSN 0167-6636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104658. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167663623001047

  12. [12]

    finite-element

    G. Besnard, F. Hild, and S. Roux. “finite-element” displacement fields analysis from digital images: Application to portevin–le chˆ atelier bands.Experimental Mechanics, 2006. ISSN 1741-2765. doi: 10.1007/s11340-006-9824-8

  13. [13]

    Vanderesse, A

    N. Vanderesse, A. Richter, N. Nu˜ no, and P. Bocher. Measurement of deformation heterogeneities in additive manufactured lattice materials by digital image correlation: Strain maps analysis and reliability assessment.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 86:397–408, 2018. ISSN 1751-6161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmbbm.2018.07....

  14. [14]

    Digital image and volume correlation for deformation and damage characterisation of fibre-reinforced composites: A review.Composite Structures, 315:116994, 2023

    John Holmes, Silvano Sommacal, Raj Das, Zbigniew Stachurski, and Paul Compston. Digital image and volume correlation for deformation and damage characterisation of fibre-reinforced composites: A review.Composite Structures, 315:116994, 2023. ISSN 25 0263-8223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116994. URLhttps://www. sciencedirect.com/science...

  15. [15]

    Disorder enhances the fracture toughness of 2d mechanical metamaterials.PNAS Nexus, 4(2):pgaf023, 01 2025

    Sage Fulco, Michal K Budzik, Hongyi Xiao, Douglas J Durian, and Kevin T Turner. Disorder enhances the fracture toughness of 2d mechanical metamaterials.PNAS Nexus, 4(2):pgaf023, 01 2025. ISSN 2752-6542. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf023. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf023

  16. [16]

    Strut-buckling transformation enabling anomalous density- scaling toughening law in ultralight lattice metamaterials.Advanced Materials, 37(27): 2419635, 2025

    Zewen Wang, Kaijin Wu, Jun Ding, Jianhai Jin, Ye Zhou, Min Li, Yu Yao, Linghui He, Zhaoqiang Song, and Yong Ni. Strut-buckling transformation enabling anomalous density- scaling toughening law in ultralight lattice metamaterials.Advanced Materials, 37(27): 2419635, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202419635. URLhttps://advanced. onlinelibrary.wiley...

  17. [17]

    Sutton Hubert Schreier, Jean-Jos´ e Orteu.Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements

    Michael A. Sutton Hubert Schreier, Jean-Jos´ e Orteu.Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements. Springer New York, NY, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-0-387-78747-3

  18. [18]

    Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review.Measurement Science and Technology, 20(6):062001, apr 2009

    Bing Pan, Kemao Qian, Huimin Xie, and Anand Asundi. Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review.Measurement Science and Technology, 20(6):062001, apr 2009. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001

  19. [19]

    Hild and S

    F. Hild and S. Roux. Comparison of local and global approaches to digital image correlation.Experimental Mechanics, 52(9):1503–1519, 2012. ISSN 1741-2765. doi: 10.1007/s11340-012-9603-7. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9603-7

  20. [20]

    Subset-based local vs

    Bo Wang and Bing Pan. Subset-based local vs. finite element-based global digital image correlation: A comparison study.Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 6(5):200– 208, 2016. ISSN 2095-0349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2016.08.003. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095034916300411

  21. [21]

    From pictures to extended finite elements: extended digital image correlation (X-DIC).Comptes Rendus

    Julien R´ ethor´ e, St´ ephane Roux, and Fran¸ cois Hild. From pictures to extended finite elements: extended digital image correlation (X-DIC).Comptes Rendus. M´ ecanique, 335 (3):131–137, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2007.02.003. 26

  22. [22]

    S. Roux, J. R´ ethor´ e, and F. Hild. Digital Image Correlation and Fracture: An Advanced Technique for Estimating Stress Intensity Factors of 2D and 3D Cracks.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 42:214004, 2009

  23. [23]

    Shaikeea, D

    A.J.D. Shaikeea, D. Hahn, V. Gandhi, H. Cui, X. Zheng, and V.S. Deshpande. The anomalous crack growth behaviour of an elastic-brittle octet-truss architected solid.Jour- nal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 190:105728, 2024. ISSN 0022-5096. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105728. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S00225...

  24. [24]

    Element-removal global digital im- age correlation for accurate discontinuous deformation field measurement in fracture mechanics.Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 290:109493, 2023

    Bin Chen, Sam Coppieters, and Erik Jungstedt. Element-removal global digital im- age correlation for accurate discontinuous deformation field measurement in fracture mechanics.Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 290:109493, 2023. ISSN 0013-7944. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109493. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0013...

  25. [25]

    dell’Isola, P

    F. dell’Isola, P. Seppecher, M. Spagnuolo, E. Barchiesi, F. Hild, T. Lekszycki, I. Giorgio, L. Placidi, U. Andreaus, M. Cuomo, S.R. Eugster, A. Pfaff, K. Hoschke, R. Langkemper, E. Turco, R. Sarikaya, A. Misra, M. De Angelo, F. D’Annibale, A. Bouterf, X. Pinelli, A. Misra, B. Desmorat, M. Pawlikowski, C. Dupuy, D. Scerrato, P. Peyre, M. Laudato, L. Manzar...

  26. [26]

    Deformation measurement in the presence of discontinuities with digital image correlation: A review.Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 137:106394,

    Ghulam Mubashar Hassan. Deformation measurement in the presence of discontinuities with digital image correlation: A review.Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 137:106394,

  27. [27]

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106394

    ISSN 0143-8166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106394. URLhttps: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816620309830

  28. [28]

    Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness

    E08 Committee. Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. Technical report, ASTM International, 2019. 27

  29. [29]

    Alessandra Lingua, Antoine Sanner, Fran¸ cois Hild, and David S. Kammer. Breaking better: How defects activate multiple toughening mechanisms in lattice materials.Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, page 105483, 2026. ISSN 0167-8442. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tafmec.2026.105483. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0167844226000492

  30. [30]

    Agence pour la Protec- tion des Programmes, Paris (France), 2015

    H Leclerc, J Neggers, F Mathieu, S Roux, and F Hild.Correli 3.0. Agence pour la Protec- tion des Programmes, Paris (France), 2015. IDDN.FR.001.520008.000.S.P.2015.000.31500

  31. [31]

    LabelRankT: Incremental Community Detection in Dynamic Networks via Label Propagation

    F. Hild and S. Roux. Digital image correlation: from displacement measurement to identification of elastic properties – a review.Strain, 42(2):69–80, 2006. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00258.x. URLhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00258.x

  32. [32]

    F. Hild, A. Bouterf, and S. Roux. Damage measurements via DIC.International Journal of Fracture, 191(1-2):77–105, 2015

  33. [33]

    Leclerc, J.N

    H. Leclerc, J.N. P´ eri´ e, S. Roux, and F. Hild. Integrated digital image correlation for the identification of mechanical properties. In A. Gagalowicz and W. Philips, editors, MIRAGE 2009, volume LNCS 5496, pages 161–171, Berlin (Germany), 2009. Springer

  34. [34]

    Rannou, N

    J. Rannou, N. Limodin, J. R´ ethor´ e, A. Gravouil, W. Ludwig, M.C. Ba¨ ıetto, J.Y. Buffi` ere, A. Combescure, F. Hild, and S. Roux. Three dimensional experimental and numerical multiscale analysis of a fatigue crack.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engi- neering, 199:1307–1325, 2010. 28