pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21654 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Causal Disentanglement for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment

Zhen Zhang , Jielei Chu , Tian Zhang , Fengmao Lv , Tianrui Li
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords image quality assessmentfull-reference IQAcausal disentanglementrepresentation learningdegradation estimationcross-domain generalizationlabel-free learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Causal disentanglement separates image content from distortions to enable accurate full-reference quality assessment even without labels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reframes full-reference image quality assessment as the problem of isolating degradation effects from unchanged image content. It does this by treating the separation as a causal process that intervenes on latent representations and adds a masking step to capture how content influences visible distortions. Quality scores are then read out from the resulting degradation features, either by regression when labels exist or by simple dimensionality reduction when they do not. The approach matches or exceeds standard methods on ordinary benchmarks while showing stronger results on unusual image types where labeled quality data is scarce.

Core claim

Degradation estimation is formulated as a causal disentanglement process guided by intervention on latent representations. Content invariance between reference and distorted images is exploited to decouple degradation and content representations. A masking module models the causal relationship between content and degradation features to extract content-influenced degradation features. Quality scores are predicted from these features via supervised regression or label-free dimensionality reduction, yielding competitive performance on standard IQA benchmarks in fully supervised, few-label, and label-free regimes and superior cross-domain generalization on non-standard natural image domains.

What carries the argument

Causal disentanglement process that intervenes on latent representations to separate degradation features from content, using a masking module to capture content-influenced degradations.

If this is right

  • Quality prediction remains effective in the complete absence of labeled scores by reducing the dimensionality of the extracted degradation features.
  • The same pipeline can be retrained on any new image domain without requiring human quality ratings for that domain.
  • Cross-domain results improve on underwater, radiographic, medical, neutron, and screen-content images relative to existing training-free baselines.
  • Fully supervised, few-shot, and unsupervised variants all reach competitive accuracy on standard IQA benchmarks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same content-degradation split could be reused for related tasks such as blind image restoration or distortion-specific editing where labels are also scarce.
  • Extending the invariance assumption to video frames or multi-view images would allow the method to handle temporal or viewpoint changes without new labels.
  • Controlled synthetic experiments that vary only one distortion type while holding scene content fixed could directly measure how cleanly the masking module isolates each degradation.

Load-bearing premise

The content shown in the reference image stays exactly the same in the distorted version, so any difference can be cleanly attributed to degradation alone.

What would settle it

Constructing a test set of reference-distorted pairs where the underlying scene content is deliberately altered between the pair and checking whether the method's quality predictions become no better than random.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21654 by Fengmao Lv, Jielei Chu, Tianrui Li, Tian Zhang, Zhen Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) shows the typical FR-IQA architecture. Most deep FR-IQA models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Structural Causal Model (SCM) for FR-IQA. Left: distorted image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustrations of different distortion visibility. Under the same distortion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In the pre-training stage, we first construct a synthetic degraded image dataset from clear images. Subsequently, the model is pre-trained using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) represents the structure of the autoencoder, and (b) is the structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Structural causal model for predicting quality scores. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Local neighborhood relations in the feature space mainly reflect the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Visualization of the one-dimensional UMAP embedding on TID2013. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The structure of the decoder and causal layer. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Image examples from diverse domains. (a) to (f) are respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Controlled validation of visual masking for answering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Counterfactual degradation transfer for answering Q1. The degra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Scatter plot of partial low-frequency degradation assessment versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Existing deep network-based full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA) models typically work by performing pairwise comparisons of deep features from the reference and distorted images. In this paper, we approach this problem from a different perspective and propose a novel FR-IQA paradigm based on causal inference and decoupled representation learning. Unlike typical feature comparison-based FR-IQA models, our approach formulates degradation estimation as a causal disentanglement process guided by intervention on latent representations. We first decouple degradation and content representations by exploiting the content invariance between the reference and distorted images. Second, inspired by the human visual masking effect, we design a masking module to model the causal relationship between image content and degradation features, thereby extracting content-influenced degradation features from distorted images. Finally, quality scores are predicted from these degradation features using either supervised regression or label-free dimensionality reduction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves highly competitive performance on standard IQA benchmarks across fully supervised, few-label, and label-free settings. Furthermore, we evaluate the approach on diverse non-standard natural image domains with scarce data, including underwater, radiographic, medical, neutron, and screen-content images. Benefiting from its ability to perform scenario-specific training and prediction without labeled IQA data, our method exhibits superior cross-domain generalization compared to existing training-free FR-IQA models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a causal disentanglement framework for full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA). It decouples degradation and content representations by exploiting content invariance between reference and distorted images, employs a masking module inspired by human visual masking to capture causal content-degradation relationships, and predicts quality via supervised regression or label-free dimensionality reduction on the resulting degradation features. Experiments are reported to show competitive performance on standard IQA benchmarks across fully supervised, few-shot, and label-free regimes, plus superior cross-domain generalization on non-standard domains (underwater, radiographic, medical, neutron, screen-content) compared to training-free baselines.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work provides a useful new paradigm for FR-IQA that supports label-free operation and improved generalization in data-scarce specialized domains. The explicit modeling of visual masking as a causal mechanism and the dual supervised/label-free pathways are strengths that could influence future representation-learning approaches to perceptual quality.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (causal disentanglement and masking module): the intervention on latent representations is described at a conceptual level but lacks an explicit causal graph, do-operator formalization, or identifiability argument showing that content invariance plus masking isolates degradation features; this is load-bearing for the label-free dimensionality-reduction claim.
  2. [§4] §4 (experiments): the reported tables do not include error bars, statistical significance tests, or ablations isolating the masking module's contribution versus plain invariance decoupling; without these, the 'highly competitive' and 'superior cross-domain generalization' claims cannot be fully verified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] Notation for the masking module (e.g., how the content-influenced degradation feature is computed from the reference and distorted latents) should be formalized with an equation rather than prose description.
  2. [§4.3] The abstract and introduction cite 'existing training-free FR-IQA models' but the experimental section should explicitly list which specific baselines (e.g., NIQE, BRISQUE variants, or recent zero-shot methods) are used for the cross-domain comparison.
  3. [§5] A short discussion of failure cases or domains where content invariance breaks (e.g., heavy geometric distortion) would strengthen the generalization analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive overall assessment. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (causal disentanglement and masking module): the intervention on latent representations is described at a conceptual level but lacks an explicit causal graph, do-operator formalization, or identifiability argument showing that content invariance plus masking isolates degradation features; this is load-bearing for the label-free dimensionality-reduction claim.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation in §3 remains largely conceptual. In the revision we will add an explicit causal graph diagram, a do-operator formalization of the latent intervention, and a concise identifiability argument that shows how content invariance together with the masking module isolates the degradation features. These additions will directly support the label-free dimensionality-reduction pathway. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (experiments): the reported tables do not include error bars, statistical significance tests, or ablations isolating the masking module's contribution versus plain invariance decoupling; without these, the 'highly competitive' and 'superior cross-domain generalization' claims cannot be fully verified.

    Authors: We accept that error bars, significance tests, and targeted ablations would strengthen verifiability. We will augment the tables with standard deviations computed over multiple random seeds and include paired statistical significance tests for the main comparisons. We will also insert a new ablation subsection that directly compares the full model (invariance + masking) against a plain invariance-decoupling baseline, thereby isolating the masking module's contribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's core pipeline—decoupling degradation and content representations via content invariance (a standard FR-IQA premise), applying an explicit masking module to model content-degradation causality, and predicting scores via supervised regression or label-free dimensionality reduction—contains no self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The abstract and description present these as design choices with independent mechanisms (invariance exploitation, visual masking inspiration, and standard reduction techniques), not reductions to the method's own outputs by construction. No uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via prior self-work, or renamings of known results are invoked as load-bearing. The claims rest on empirical benchmarks rather than tautological derivations, making the chain self-contained against external evaluation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about content invariance and causal relationships in image representations, plus the introduction of a masking module without independent evidence beyond the proposed method itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Content invariance between reference and distorted images allows decoupling of degradation and content representations
    Invoked as the basis for the first decoupling step in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Masking module no independent evidence
    purpose: To model the causal relationship between image content and degradation features and extract content-influenced degradation features
    Designed specifically for this method, inspired by human visual masking effect, with no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1337 out tokens · 54641 ms · 2026-05-09T22:04:48.069194+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,

    Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,”IEEE transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004. 1, 10, 11

    2004

  2. [2]

    Fsim: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment,

    L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Mou, and D. Zhang, “Fsim: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2378–2386, 2011. 1

    2011

  3. [3]

    Full-reference image quality assessment by combining global and local distortion measures,

    A. Saha and Q. J. Wu, “Full-reference image quality assessment by combining global and local distortion measures,”Signal Processing, vol. 128, pp. 186–197, 2016. 1

    2016

  4. [4]

    Reduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation,

    A. Rehman and Z. Wang, “Reduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation,”IEEE Transactions on Image Pro- cessing, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 3378–3389, 2012. 1

    2012

  5. [5]

    No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,

    A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, and A. C. Bovik, “No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4695–4708, 2012. 1 15

    2012

  6. [6]

    Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity,

    K. Ding, K. Ma, S. Wang, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 2567– 2581, 2020. 1, 2, 10

    2020

  7. [7]

    Comparison of full-reference image quality models for optimiza- tion of image processing systems,

    ——, “Comparison of full-reference image quality models for optimiza- tion of image processing systems,”International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 1258–1281, 2021. 1

    2021

  8. [8]

    Image quality assessment: Measuring perceptual degradation via distribution measures in deep feature spaces,

    X. Liao, X. Wei, M. Zhou, Z. Li, and S. Kwong, “Image quality assessment: Measuring perceptual degradation via distribution measures in deep feature spaces,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 33, pp. 4044–4059, 2024. 1

    2024

  9. [9]

    Per- ceptual attacks of no-reference image quality models with human-in- the-loop,

    W. Zhang, D. Li, X. Min, G. Zhai, G. Guo, X. Yang, and K. Ma, “Per- ceptual attacks of no-reference image quality models with human-in- the-loop,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 2916–2929, 2022. 1

    2022

  10. [10]

    Topiq: A top-down approach from semantics to distortions for image quality assessment,

    C. Chen, J. Mo, J. Hou, H. Wu, L. Liao, W. Sun, Q. Yan, and W. Lin, “Topiq: A top-down approach from semantics to distortions for image quality assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 33, pp. 2404–2418, 2024. 1, 3, 10

    2024

  11. [11]

    Image quality assessment: Exploring joint degradation effect of deep network features via kernel representation similarity analysis,

    X. Liao, X. Wei, M. Zhou, H.-S. Wong, and S. Kwong, “Image quality assessment: Exploring joint degradation effect of deep network features via kernel representation similarity analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025. 1, 3, 10

    2025

  12. [12]

    Deep self- dissimilarities as powerful visual fingerprints,

    I. Kligvasser, T. Shaham, Y . Bahat, and T. Michaeli, “Deep self- dissimilarities as powerful visual fingerprints,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 3939–3951, 2021. 1, 10, 11

    2021

  13. [13]

    Image quality assessment: Investigating causal perceptual effects with abductive counterfactual inference,

    W. Shen, M. Zhou, Y . Chen, X. Wei, Y . Feng, H. Pu, and W. Jia, “Image quality assessment: Investigating causal perceptual effects with abductive counterfactual inference,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 17 990–17 999. 1, 3, 10, 11

    2025

  14. [14]

    Image quality assessment: Measuring perceptual degradation via distribution measures in deep feature spaces,

    X. Liao, X. Wei, M. Zhou, Z. Li, and S. Kwong, “Image quality assessment: Measuring perceptual degradation via distribution measures in deep feature spaces,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 33, pp. 4044–4059, 2024. 1, 10, 11

    2024

  15. [15]

    Deepdc: Deep distance correlation as a perceptual image quality evaluator,

    H. Zhu, B. Chen, L. Zhu, S. Wang, and W. Lin, “Deepdc: Deep distance correlation as a perceptual image quality evaluator,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 34, pp. 7859–7873, 2025. 1, 3, 10, 11

    2025

  16. [16]

    Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition

    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014. 1, 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for con- volutional neural networks,

    M. Tan and Q. Le, “Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for con- volutional neural networks,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 6105–6114. 1

    2019

  18. [18]

    Deepwsd: Projecting degradations in perceptual space to wasserstein distance in deep feature space,

    X. Liao, B. Chen, H. Zhu, S. Wang, M. Zhou, and S. Kwong, “Deepwsd: Projecting degradations in perceptual space to wasserstein distance in deep feature space,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2022, pp. 970–978. 1, 2, 10, 11

    2022

  19. [19]

    Deepsim: Deep similarity for image quality assessment,

    F. Gao, Y . Wang, P. Li, M. Tan, J. Yu, and Y . Zhu, “Deepsim: Deep similarity for image quality assessment,”Neurocomputing, vol. 257, pp. 104–114, 2017. 2

    2017

  20. [20]

    Deep learning of human visual sensitivity in image quality assessment framework,

    J. Kim and S. Lee, “Deep learning of human visual sensitivity in image quality assessment framework,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 1676–1684. 2

    2017

  21. [21]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,

    R. Zhang, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, E. Shechtman, and O. Wang, “The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 586–595. 2, 10, 11

    2018

  22. [22]

    Locally adaptive struc- ture and texture similarity for image quality assessment,

    K. Ding, Y . Liu, X. Zou, S. Wang, and K. Ma, “Locally adaptive struc- ture and texture similarity for image quality assessment,” inProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on multimedia, 2021, pp. 2483–2491. 2

    2021

  23. [23]

    H. D. Sikka,A Deeper Look at the Unsupervised Learning of Disen- tangled Representations inβ-VAE from the perspective of Core Object Recognition. Harvard University, 2020. 3, 6

    2020

  24. [24]

    Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    beta-vae: Learning basic visual concepts with a constrained variational framework,

    I. Higgins, L. Matthey, A. Pal, C. Burgess, X. Glorot, M. Botvinick, S. Mohamed, and A. Lerchner, “beta-vae: Learning basic visual concepts with a constrained variational framework,” inInternational conference on learning representations, 2017. 3

    2017

  26. [26]

    Causalvae: Disentangled representation learning via neural structural causal mod- els,

    M. Yang, F. Liu, Z. Chen, X. Shen, J. Hao, and J. Wang, “Causalvae: Disentangled representation learning via neural structural causal mod- els,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 9593–9602. 3, 4, 6

    2021

  27. [27]

    Scadi: Self-supervised causal disentanglement in latent vari- able models,

    H. Nam, “Scadi: Self-supervised causal disentanglement in latent vari- able models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06567, 2023. 3, 4, 6

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Luminance-model-based dct quantization for color image compression,

    A. J. Ahumada Jr and H. A. Peterson, “Luminance-model-based dct quantization for color image compression,” inHuman vision, visual processing, and digital display III, vol. 1666. SPIE, 1992, pp. 365–374. 3, 8

    1992

  29. [29]

    Measuring contrast sensitivity,

    D. G. Pelli and P. Bex, “Measuring contrast sensitivity,”Vision research, vol. 90, pp. 10–14, 2013. 3, 8

    2013

  30. [30]

    Contrast masking in human vision,

    G. E. Legge and J. M. Foley, “Contrast masking in human vision,” Journal of the optical Society of America, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1458– 1471, 1980. 3, 8

    1980

  31. [31]

    Perceptually-friendly h. 264/avc video coding based on foveated just-noticeable-distortion model,

    Z. Chen and C. Guillemot, “Perceptually-friendly h. 264/avc video coding based on foveated just-noticeable-distortion model,”IEEE Trans- actions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 806–819, 2010. 3, 8

    2010

  32. [32]

    Visual interaction perceptual network for blind image quality assessment,

    X. Wang, J. Xiong, and W. Lin, “Visual interaction perceptual network for blind image quality assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 8958–8971, 2023. 3

    2023

  33. [33]

    Cdinet: Content distortion interaction network for blind image quality assessment,

    L. Zheng, Y . Luo, Z. Zhou, J. Ling, and G. Yue, “Cdinet: Content distortion interaction network for blind image quality assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 7089–7100, 2024. 3

    2024

  34. [34]

    Image database tid2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives,

    N. Ponomarenko, L. Jin, O. Ieremeiev, V . Lukin, K. Egiazarian, J. Astola, B. V ozel, K. Chehdi, M. Carli, F. Battistiet al., “Image database tid2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives,”Signal Processing: Image Com- munication, vol. 30, pp. 57–77, 2015. 4, 5, 10

    2015

  35. [35]

    A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms,

    H. R. Sheikh, M. F. Sabir, and A. C. Bovik, “A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3440–3451, 2006. 4, 5, 10

    2006

  36. [36]

    Weakly supervised disentangled generative causal representation learning,

    X. Shen, F. Liu, H. Dong, Q. Lian, Z. Chen, and T. Zhang, “Weakly supervised disentangled generative causal representation learning,”Jour- nal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 23, no. 241, pp. 1–55, 2022. 4, 6

    2022

  37. [37]

    Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations,

    F. Locatello, S. Bauer, M. Lucic, G. Raetsch, S. Gelly, B. Sch ¨olkopf, and O. Bachem, “Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations,” ininternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 4114–4124. 5

    2019

  38. [38]

    Pearl,Causality

    J. Pearl,Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009. 6

    2009

  39. [39]

    Counterfactual fairness,

    M. J. Kusner, J. Loftus, C. Russell, and R. Silva, “Counterfactual fairness,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30,

  40. [40]

    Degae: A new pretraining paradigm for low-level vision,

    Y . Liu, J. He, J. Gu, X. Kong, and C. Dong, “Degae: A new pretraining paradigm for low-level vision,”Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 23 292–23 303, 2023. 6

    2023

  41. [41]

    Blind image quality assessment based on geometric order learning,

    N.-H. Shin, S.-H. Lee, and C.-S. Kim, “Blind image quality assessment based on geometric order learning,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 12 799–12 808. 7

    2024

  42. [42]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778. 8

    2016

  43. [43]

    Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution,

    J. Johnson, A. Alahi, and L. Fei-Fei, “Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution,” inEuropean conference on computer vision. Springer, 2016, pp. 694–711. 9

    2016

  44. [44]

    Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network,

    C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz ´ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wanget al., “Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 4681–4690. 9

    2017

  45. [45]

    Image-to- image translation with conditional adversarial networks,

    M. Tahmid, M. S. Alam, N. Rao, and K. M. A. Ashrafi, “Image-to- image translation with conditional adversarial networks,” in2023 IEEE 9th International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE), 2023, pp. 1–5. 9

    2023

  46. [46]

    Most apparent distortion: full- reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy,

    E. C. Larson and D. M. Chandler, “Most apparent distortion: full- reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy,”Journal of electronic imaging, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 011 006–011 006, 2010. 10

    2010

  47. [47]

    Kadid-10k: A large-scale artificially distorted iqa database,

    H. Lin, V . Hosu, and D. Saupe, “Kadid-10k: A large-scale artificially distorted iqa database,” in2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–3. 10

    2019

  48. [48]

    Pipal: a large-scale image quality assessment dataset for perceptual im- age restoration,

    G. Jinjin, C. Haoming, C. Haoyu, Y . Xiaoxing, J. S. Ren, and D. Chao, “Pipal: a large-scale image quality assessment dataset for perceptual im- age restoration,” inEuropean conference on computer vision. Springer, 2020, pp. 633–651. 10

    2020

  49. [49]

    Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment,

    Z. Wang, E. P. Simoncelli, and A. C. Bovik, “Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment,” inThe thrity-seventh asilomar conference on signals, systems & computers, 2003, vol. 2. Ieee, 2003, pp. 1398–1402. 10, 11 16

    2003

  50. [50]

    Image information and visual quality,

    H. R. Sheikh and A. C. Bovik, “Image information and visual quality,” IEEE Transactions on image processing, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 430–444,

  51. [51]

    Vsi: A visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment,

    L. Zhang, Y . Shen, and H. Li, “Vsi: A visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Image processing, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 4270–4281, 2014. 10, 11

    2014

  52. [52]

    Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index,

    W. Xue, L. Zhang, X. Mou, and A. C. Bovik, “Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index,” IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 684–695,

  53. [53]

    Perceptual image quality assessment using a normalized laplacian pyramid,

    V . Laparra, J. Ball ´e, A. Berardino, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Perceptual image quality assessment using a normalized laplacian pyramid,”Elec- tronic Imaging, vol. 28, pp. 1–6, 2016. 10, 11

    2016

  54. [54]

    Pieapp: Perceptual image- error assessment through pairwise preference,

    E. Prashnani, H. Cai, Y . Mostofi, and P. Sen, “Pieapp: Perceptual image- error assessment through pairwise preference,” inProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 1808–1817. 10

    2018

  55. [55]

    Projected distribution loss for image enhancement,

    M. Delbracio, H. Talebei, and P. Milanfar, “Projected distribution loss for image enhancement,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–12. 10, 11

    2021

  56. [56]

    Locally adaptive struc- ture and texture similarity for image quality assessment,

    K. Ding, Y . Liu, X. Zou, S. Wang, and K. Ma, “Locally adaptive struc- ture and texture similarity for image quality assessment,” inProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on multimedia, 2021, pp. 2483–2491. 10, 11

    2021

  57. [57]

    Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regularization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of infrared compressed images,

    O. Zelmati, B. Bond ˇzuli´c, B. Pavlovi´c, I. Tot, and S. Merrouche, “Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of infrared compressed images,”Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 73–87,

  59. [59]

    Comprehensive quality assessment method for neutron radiographic im- ages based on cnn and visual salience,

    Z. Zhang, C.-B. Meng, X.-L. Jiang, C.-Y . Zhao, S. Qiao, and T. Zhang, “Comprehensive quality assessment method for neutron radiographic im- ages based on cnn and visual salience,”Nuclear Science and Techniques, vol. 36, no. 7, p. 118, 2025. 10, 11

    2025

  60. [60]

    Scid: A database for screen content images quality assessment,

    Z. Ni, L. Ma, H. Zeng, Y . Fu, L. Xing, and K.-K. Ma, “Scid: A database for screen content images quality assessment,” in2017 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Sys- tems (ISPACS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 774–779. 10, 11

    2017

  61. [61]

    Cnn-based medical ultrasound image quality assessment,

    S. Zhang, Y . Wang, J. Jiang, J. Dong, W. Yi, and W. Hou, “Cnn-based medical ultrasound image quality assessment,”Complexity, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 9938367, 2021. 10, 11

    2021

  62. [62]

    Construction of the hyper- spectral image distortion evaluation index for low altitude uavs,

    Q. Zhao, H. Liu, W. Tian, and X. Wang, “Construction of the hyper- spectral image distortion evaluation index for low altitude uavs,”Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng, vol. 20, pp. 67–76, 2022. 11

    2022