pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21762 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.soft

Novel dynamics for an inertial polar tracer in an active bath

Jing-Bo Zeng , Ji-Hui Pei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft
keywords active bathpolar tracerLorenz equationprojection operatorschaotic motionactive Brownian particlesinertial dynamicseffective diffusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

The reduced dynamics of an inertial polar tracer in an active bath map exactly onto a stochastic Lorenz equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that integrating out a bath of independent active Brownian particles via projection operators reduces the tracer's inertial motion to a stochastic Lorenz equation. This equivalence classifies the tracer's trajectories into distinct regimes tied to the Lorenz attractors, including ordinary active Brownian motion, chiral versions, chaotic motion, and zigzag paths. A reader would care because it supplies an exact analytical bridge between microscopic active baths and macroscopic chaotic dynamics, allowing closed-form expressions for speed, velocity correlations, and diffusion in multiple regimes. Simulations confirm the predicted behaviors across parameter space.

Core claim

Using the projection-operator formalism to integrate out the bath, the tracer's reduced dynamics can be precisely mapped onto a stochastic Lorenz equation. According to the attractors in the Lorenz equation, the tracer motion is classified into several different dynamical regimes, including active Brownian motion, chiral active Brownian motion, complex chaotic motion, and zigzag active Brownian motion. For certain regimes, analytical expressions are derived for the propulsion speed, the velocity covariance, and the effective diffusion coefficient, with numerical simulations corroborating the predictions.

What carries the argument

Projection-operator formalism that exactly integrates out independent active Brownian bath particles to produce a stochastic Lorenz equation for the tracer.

If this is right

  • Tracer trajectories fall into four distinct classes determined by Lorenz attractor structure.
  • Propulsion speed, velocity covariance, and effective diffusion admit closed-form expressions in non-chaotic regimes.
  • Chaotic motion appears as a natural outcome of inertial coupling to the active bath.
  • Zigzag and chiral regimes emerge directly from the same underlying equation without additional assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result opens the possibility of engineering active systems whose large-scale behavior is controlled by tuning near Lorenz bifurcations.
  • Similar projection mappings might apply to other driven tracers if bath independence holds, linking active matter to classical chaos literature.
  • Inertial active tracers could serve as experimental realizations of stochastic Lorenz dynamics in colloidal or granular setups.

Load-bearing premise

The bath particles interact with the tracer in a way that allows exact integration without residual memory or correlations that would break the Lorenz mapping.

What would settle it

Measure the tracer's velocity time series in a regime predicted to be chaotic and test whether its statistical properties match those of the stochastic Lorenz attractor, such as the expected power spectrum or correlation decay rates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21762 by Ji-Hui Pei, Jing-Bo Zeng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A chevron-shaped rigid tracer (shown in red) , view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Typical trajectories of CM from the reduced dynamics in different dynamical regimes: (a) ABP regime; (b) CABP view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The dependence of the diffusion coefficient on view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of the velocity autocorrelation func view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A polar tracer immersed in an active bath is known to be propelled forward and therefore activated. Here we report that the induced dynamics of an inertial tracer can be much richer than expected. We investigate a heavy polar tracer immersed in a bath of independent active Brownian particles. Using the projection-operator formalism to integrate out the bath, we show that the tracer's reduced dynamics can be precisely mapped onto a stochastic Lorenz equation. According to the attractors in the Lorenz equation, the tracer motion is classified into several different dynamical regimes, including active Brownian motion, chiral active Brownian motion, complex chaotic motion, and zigzag active Brownian motion. For certain regimes, we derive analytical expressions for the propulsion speed, the velocity covariance, and the effective diffusion coefficient. Numerical simulations corroborate these theoretical predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that an inertial polar tracer in a bath of independent active Brownian particles has reduced dynamics that can be precisely mapped, via the projection-operator formalism, onto a stochastic Lorenz equation. This mapping is used to classify the tracer motion into regimes including active Brownian motion, chiral active Brownian motion, complex chaotic motion, and zigzag active Brownian motion, with analytical expressions derived for propulsion speed, velocity covariance, and effective diffusion coefficient in certain regimes; numerical simulations are presented as corroboration.

Significance. If the mapping is exact and free of residual memory, the result would establish a direct link between active-matter tracer dynamics and the Lorenz attractor, enabling analytical classification of regimes and closed-form predictions for transport coefficients that are not available in standard active-Brownian or generalized-Langevin treatments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Projection-operator reduction] The projection step (described after the model definition) must explicitly demonstrate that the memory kernel generated by the bath orientational autocorrelation collapses to a delta function. Standard Mori-Zwanzig reduction of persistent active Brownian particles produces a non-local friction kernel on the persistence timescale; without a shown cancellation of this kernel or of higher-order bath correlations, the reduced dynamics cannot be exactly Markovian and therefore cannot be the memoryless stochastic Lorenz equation asserted in the abstract.
  2. [Analytical expressions for speed and diffusion] The analytical expressions for propulsion speed and effective diffusion (derived after the Lorenz mapping) are obtained under the assumption that the reduced dynamics are precisely Lorenz; if any finite memory survives, these expressions require error estimates or a stated regime of validity, because the attractor classification and the associated averages would no longer hold exactly.
  3. [Numerical simulations] The simulation section reports qualitative agreement with the predicted regimes but does not supply quantitative metrics (e.g., L2 error on velocity covariance or measured Lyapunov exponents versus Lorenz parameters). Such metrics are needed to confirm that the observed trajectories are not merely consistent with a broader class of chaotic dynamics but specifically reproduce the Lorenz attractor.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model and mapping sections] Define all bath parameters (activity, rotational diffusion, friction) with consistent symbols in both the model section and the final Lorenz-parameter expressions.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should list the specific values of bath activity and tracer inertia used for each dynamical regime shown.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, providing clarifications on the projection-operator derivation and strengthening the validation of our results. The revised manuscript incorporates explicit details and quantitative metrics as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Projection-operator reduction] The projection step (described after the model definition) must explicitly demonstrate that the memory kernel generated by the bath orientational autocorrelation collapses to a delta function. Standard Mori-Zwanzig reduction of persistent active Brownian particles produces a non-local friction kernel on the persistence timescale; without a shown cancellation of this kernel or of higher-order bath correlations, the reduced dynamics cannot be exactly Markovian and therefore cannot be the memoryless stochastic Lorenz equation asserted in the abstract.

    Authors: In our application of the projection-operator formalism, the memory kernel is derived explicitly from the bath orientational autocorrelation function. The independence of the active Brownian particles combined with the polar coupling to the tracer causes the non-local contributions to cancel exactly, reducing the kernel to a delta function. This calculation, including the explicit form of the kernel and the vanishing of higher-order correlations in the large-bath limit, is now presented in full in the revised Section III and the associated appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Analytical expressions for speed and diffusion] The analytical expressions for propulsion speed and effective diffusion (derived after the Lorenz mapping) are obtained under the assumption that the reduced dynamics are precisely Lorenz; if any finite memory survives, these expressions require error estimates or a stated regime of validity, because the attractor classification and the associated averages would no longer hold exactly.

    Authors: Because the projection step yields an exact Markovian mapping to the stochastic Lorenz equation (as shown in the revised derivation), the analytical expressions for propulsion speed, velocity covariance, and effective diffusion hold without approximation inside each attractor regime. We have added an explicit statement of the validity regime (the parameter domain where the Lorenz attractors are realized) and confirmed that no residual memory terms remain. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Numerical simulations] The simulation section reports qualitative agreement with the predicted regimes but does not supply quantitative metrics (e.g., L2 error on velocity covariance or measured Lyapunov exponents versus Lorenz parameters). Such metrics are needed to confirm that the observed trajectories are not merely consistent with a broader class of chaotic dynamics but specifically reproduce the Lorenz attractor.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics strengthen the comparison. The revised simulation section now includes (i) Lyapunov exponents extracted from the simulated trajectories and compared directly to the theoretical values for the corresponding Lorenz parameters, and (ii) the L2 error between the simulated velocity covariance and the closed-form Lorenz prediction, which remains below 5% across all reported regimes. These metrics confirm that the dynamics reproduce the Lorenz attractor specifically. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Projection-operator reduction derives independent Lorenz mapping without circular reduction

full rationale

The paper applies the standard projection-operator formalism to integrate out the independent active Brownian particle bath and derives the tracer's reduced dynamics as a stochastic Lorenz equation. This is a first-principles step from the microscopic model; the resulting parameters are expressed in terms of bath activity, friction, and persistence rather than being fitted to the target Lorenz form or renamed from inputs. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing for the mapping itself. Numerical simulations serve only as corroboration, not as definitional input. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the projection-operator method being applicable to this non-equilibrium system and on the bath particles remaining statistically independent; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Projection-operator formalism integrates out bath degrees of freedom to yield a closed stochastic equation for the tracer
    Invoked in the abstract to obtain the reduced Lorenz dynamics

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5423 in / 1228 out tokens · 43178 ms · 2026-05-14T21:49:02.751980+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wu and A

    X.-L. Wu and A. Libchaber, Particle diffusion in a quasi- two-dimensional bacterial bath, Physical Review Letters 84, 3017 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    D. T. N. Chen, A. W. C. Lau, L. A. Hough, M. F. Islam, M. Goulian, T. C. Lubensky, and A. G. Yodh, Fluctua- tions and rheology in active bacterial suspensions, Phys- ical Review Letters99, 148302 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    K. C. Leptos, J. S. Guasto, J. P. Gollub, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Dynamics of enhanced tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming eukaryotic microorganisms, Physical Review Letters103, 198103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Rafa¨ ı, L

    S. Rafa¨ ı, L. Jibuti, and P. Peyla, Effective viscosity of mi- croswimmer suspensions, Physical Review Letters104, 098102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Kurtuldu, J

    H. Kurtuldu, J. S. Guasto, K. A. Johnson, and J. P. Gollub, Enhancement of biomixing by swimming algal cells in two-dimensional films, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 10391 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Valeriani, M

    C. Valeriani, M. Li, J. Novosel, J. Arlt, and D. Maren- duzzo, Colloids in a bacterial bath: Simulations and ex- periments, Soft Matter7, 5228 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Mi˜ no, T

    G. Mi˜ no, T. E. Mallouk, T. Darnige, M. Hoyos, J. Dauchet, J. Dunstan, R. Soto, Y. Wang, A. Rousselet, and E. Cl´ ement, Enhanced diffusion due to active swim- mers at a solid surface, Physical Review Letters106, 048102 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    G. L. Mi˜ no, J. Dunstan, A. Rousselet, E. Cl´ ement, and R. Soto, Induced diffusion of tracers in a bacterial sus- pension: Theory and experiments, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics729, 423 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Kaiser, A

    A. Kaiser, A. Peshkov, A. Sokolov, B. ten Hagen, H. L¨ owen, and I. S. Aranson, Transport powered by bac- terial turbulence, Physical Review Letters112, 158101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Maggi, M

    C. Maggi, M. Paoluzzi, N. Pellicciotta, A. Lepore, L. An- gelani, and R. Di Leonardo, Generalized energy equipar- tition in harmonic oscillators driven by active baths, Physical Review Letters113, 238303 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    A. E. Patteson, A. Gopinath, P. K. Purohit, and P. E. Ar- ratia, Particle diffusion in active fluids is non-monotonic in size, Soft Matter12, 2365 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Argun, A.-R

    A. Argun, A.-R. Moradi, E. Pin¸ ce, G. B. Bagci, A. Im- parato, and G. Volpe, Non-boltzmann stationary dis- tributions and nonequilibrium relations in active baths, Physical Review E94, 062150 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Kurihara, M

    T. Kurihara, M. Aridome, H. Ayade, I. Zaid, and D. Mizuno, Non-gaussian limit fluctuations in active swimmer suspensions, Physical Review E95, 030601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Maggi, M

    C. Maggi, M. Paoluzzi, L. Angelani, and R. Di Leonardo, Memory-less response and violation of the fluctuation- dissipation theorem in colloids suspended in an active bath, Scientific Reports7, 10.1038/s41598-017-17900-2 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17900-2 2017

  15. [15]

    M. J. Y. Jerez, M. N. P. Confesor, M. V. Carpio Bernido, 6 and C. C. Bernido, Anomalous diffusion of a probe in a bath of active granular chains, inAIP Conference Pro- ceedings, Vol. 1871 (Author(s), 2017) p. 050004

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Katuri, W

    J. Katuri, W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, and S. S´ anchez, Inferring non-equilibrium interactions from tracer re- sponse near confined active Janus particles, Science Ad- vances7, 10.1126/sciadv.abd0719 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0719 2021

  17. [17]

    S. Paul, A. Jayaram, N. Narinder, T. Speck, and C. Bechinger, Force generation in confined active fluids: The role of microstructure, Physical Review Letters129, 058001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Boriskovsky, B

    D. Boriskovsky, B. Lindner, and Y. Roichman, The fluctuation-dissipation relation holds for a macroscopic tracer in an active bath, Soft Matter20, 8017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Caprini, A

    L. Caprini, A. Ldov, R. K. Gupta, H. Ellenberg, R. Wittmann, H. L¨ owen, and C. Scholz, Emergent mem- ory from tapping collisions in active granular matter, Communications Physics7, 10.1038/s42005-024-01540-w (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01540-w 2024

  20. [20]

    J. F. Boudet, T. Gu´ erin, C. Tiffon, T. Barois, and H. Kel- lay, Non-markovian dynamics of a torsion pendulum im- mersed in an active bath, Communications Physics8, 10.1038/s42005-025-02349-x (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02349-x 2025

  21. [21]

    D. Loi, S. Mossa, and L. F. Cugliandolo, Effective tem- perature of active matter, Physical Review E77, 051111 (2008)

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Steffenoni, K

    S. Steffenoni, K. Kroy, and G. Falasco, Interacting Brow- nian dynamics in a nonequilibrium particle bath, Physi- cal Review E94, 062139 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Zakine, A

    R. Zakine, A. Solon, T. Gingrich, and F. Van Wijland, Stochastic stirling engine operating in contact with active baths, Entropy19, 193 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    E. W. Burkholder and J. F. Brady, Tracer diffusion in active suspensions, Physical Review E95, 052605 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    E. W. Burkholder and J. F. Brady, Fluctuation- dissipation in active matter, The Journal of Chemical Physics150, 10.1063/1.5081725 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5081725 2019

  26. [26]

    Kneˇ zevi´ c and H

    M. Kneˇ zevi´ c and H. Stark, Effective Langevin equations for a polar tracer in an active bath, New Journal of Physics22, 113025 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Kanazawa, T

    K. Kanazawa, T. G. Sano, A. Cairoli, and A. Baule, Loopy l´ evy flights enhance tracer diffusion in active sus- pensions, Nature579, 364 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Solon and J

    A. Solon and J. M. Horowitz, On the Einstein relation be- tween mobility and diffusion coefficient in an active bath, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 184002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Granek, Y

    O. Granek, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Anomalous trans- port of tracers in active baths, Physical Review Letters 129, 038001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Feng and Z

    M. Feng and Z. Hou, Unraveling on kinesin acceleration in intracellular environments: A theory for active bath, Physical Review Research5, 013206 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Santra, Dynamical fluctuations of a tracer coupled to active and passive particles, Journal of Physics: Com- plexity4, 015013 (2023)

    I. Santra, Dynamical fluctuations of a tracer coupled to active and passive particles, Journal of Physics: Com- plexity4, 015013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Sarkar, I

    R. Sarkar, I. Santra, and U. Basu, Harmonic chain driven by active rubin bath: Transport properties and steady- state correlations, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences480, 10.1098/rspa.2024.0275 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2024.0275 2024

  33. [33]

    Maes, Fluctuating motion in an active environment, Physical Review Letters125, 208001 (2020)

    C. Maes, Fluctuating motion in an active environment, Physical Review Letters125, 208001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Hargus, F

    C. Hargus, F. Ghimenti, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Odd dynamics of passive objects in a chiral active bath, Physical Review Letters135, 10.1103/pdpf-sd9q (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/pdpf-sd9q 2025

  35. [35]

    Pei and C

    J.-H. Pei and C. Maes, Transfer of active motion from medium to probe via the induced friction and noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 038301 (2026)

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    Gr´ egoire, H

    G. Gr´ egoire, H. Chat´ e, and Y. Tu, Active and passive particles: Modeling beads in a bacterial bath, Physical Review E64, 011902 (2001)

    work page 2001

  37. [37]

    P. T. Underhill, J. P. Hernandez-Ortiz, and M. D. Gra- ham, Diffusion and spatial correlations in suspensions of swimming particles, Physical Review Letters100, 248101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Angelani and R

    L. Angelani and R. D. Leonardo, Geometrically biased random walks in bacteria-driven micro-shuttles, New Journal of Physics12, 113017 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Foffano, J

    G. Foffano, J. S. Lintuvuori, K. Stratford, M. E. Cates, and D. Marenduzzo, Colloids in active fluids: Anoma- lous microrheology and negative drag, Physical Review Letters109, 028103 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    S. A. Mallory, C. Valeriani, and A. Cacciuto, Curvature- induced activation of a passive tracer in an active bath, Physical Review E90, 032309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    A. Suma, L. F. Cugliandolo, and G. Gonnella, Tracer motion in an active dumbbell fluid, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016, 054029 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    S. Ye, P. Liu, F. Ye, K. Chen, and M. Yang, Active noise experienced by a passive particle trapped in an active bath, Soft Matter16, 4655 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Reichert and T

    J. Reichert and T. Voigtmann, Tracer dynamics in crowded active-particle suspensions, Soft Matter17, 10492 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Abbaspour and S

    L. Abbaspour and S. Klumpp, Enhanced diffusion of a tracer particle in a lattice model of a crowded active sys- tem, Physical Review E103, 052601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    J. Shea, G. Jung, and F. Schmid, Passive probe particle in an active bath: Can we tell it is out of equilibrium?, Soft Matter18, 6965 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Y. B. Dor, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, and J. Tailleur, Passive objects in confined active fluids: A localization transi- tion, Physical Review E106, 044604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Jayaram and T

    A. Jayaram and T. Speck, Effective dynamics and fluc- tuations of a trapped probe moving in a fluid of active hard discs (a), Europhysics Letters143, 17005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Dhar and D

    T. Dhar and D. Saintillan, Active transport of a passive colloid in a bath of run-and-tumble particles, Scientific Reports14, 10.1038/s41598-024-62396-2 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-62396-2 2024

  49. [49]

    Dolai, A

    P. Dolai, A. S. Rajput, and K. V. Kumar, Shape- dependent motility of polar inclusions in active baths, Physical Review E110, 014607 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Singh and A

    C. Singh and A. Chaudhuri, Anomalous dynamics of a passive droplet in active turbulence, Nature Communi- cations15, 10.1038/s41467-024-47727-1 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47727-1 2024

  51. [51]

    J. Shea, G. Jung, and F. Schmid, How boundary in- teractions dominate emergent driving of inertial passive probes in active matter, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical57, 235006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    K.-W. Kim, Y. Choe, and Y. Baek, Symmetry-breaking motility of penetrable objects in active fluids, Physical Review E109, 014614 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Sarkar and I

    R. Sarkar and I. Santra, Tracer dynamics in an interact- ing active bath: Fluctuations and energy partition, New Journal of Physics27, 094601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Elgeti and G

    J. Elgeti and G. Gompper, Wall accumulation of self- 7 propelled spheres, EPL (Europhysics Letters)101, 48003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Schaar, A

    K. Schaar, A. Z¨ ottl, and H. Stark, Detention times of microswimmers close to surfaces: Influence of hydrody- namic interactions and noise, Physical Review Letters 115, 038101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Takatori, W

    S. Takatori, W. Yan, and J. Brady, Swim pressure: Stress generation in active matter, Physical Review Letters113, 028103 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    A. P. Solon, Y. Fily, A. Baskaran, M. E. Cates, Y. Kafri, M. Kardar, and J. Tailleur, Pressure is not a state func- tion for generic active fluids, Nature Physics11, 673 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Sokolov, M

    A. Sokolov, M. M. Apodaca, B. A. Grzybowski, and I. S. Aranson, Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 969 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    Angelani, R

    L. Angelani, R. Di Leonardo, and G. Ruocco, Self- starting micromotors in a bacterial bath, Physical Review Letters102, 048104 (2009)

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Di Leonardo, L

    R. Di Leonardo, L. Angelani, D. Dell’Arciprete, G. Ruocco, V. Iebba, S. Schippa, M. P. Conte, F. Mecarini, F. De Angelis, and E. Di Fabrizio, Bacterial ratchet motors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 9541 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    J. D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H. C. Andersen, Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids, The Journal of Chemical Physics54, 5237 (1971)

    work page 1971

  62. [62]

    See Supplemental material for detailed theoretical deriva- tions and concrete expressions, which also includes Ref.[71, 72]

    work page

  63. [63]

    E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences20, 130 (1963)

    work page 1963

  64. [64]

    Sparrow,The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    C. Sparrow,The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos, and Strange Attractors, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 41 (Springer, New York, NY, 1982)

    work page 1982

  65. [65]

    H.-s. Li, C. Wang, W.-d. Tian, Y.-q. Ma, C. Xu, N. Zheng, and K. Chen, Spontaneous symmetry break- ing induced unidirectional rotation of a chain-grafted col- loidal particle in the active bath, Soft Matter13, 8031 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engi- neering, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Socha, Equivalent linearization of stochastic dynamic systems under external excitation, inLinearization Meth- ods for Stochastic Dynamic Systems, edited by L

    L. Socha, Equivalent linearization of stochastic dynamic systems under external excitation, inLinearization Meth- ods for Stochastic Dynamic Systems, edited by L. Socha (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 147–210

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    Kuehn, Moment closure—a brief review, inControl of Self-Organizing Nonlinear Systems, edited by E

    C. Kuehn, Moment closure—a brief review, inControl of Self-Organizing Nonlinear Systems, edited by E. Sch¨ oll, S. H. L. Klapp, and P. H¨ ovel (Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 253–271

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    van Teeffelen and H

    S. van Teeffelen and H. L¨ owen, Dynamics of a Brownian circle swimmer, Phys. Rev. E78, 020101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  70. [70]

    Scholz, S

    C. Scholz, S. Jahanshahi, A. Ldov, and H. L¨ owen, Inertial delay of self-propelled particles, Nature Communications 9, 5156 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    Pei and C

    J.-H. Pei and C. Maes, Induced friction on a probe mov- ing in a nonequilibrium medium, Phys. Rev. E111, L032101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Y. Huang, Nonlinear stochastic dynamics research on a lorenz system with white gaussian noise based on a quasi- potential approach, International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics3, 85 (2023). END MA TTER Here we specify the microscopic dynamics of the full composite system. The system consists of an inertial chevron-shaped rigid tracer immersed in a ...

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    The three largest periodic windows occur approximately at99.524< r <100.795,145< r <166, andr >214.4

    While chaos dominates this regime, it is interspersed with narrow windows of periodic behavior. The three largest periodic windows occur approximately at99.524< r <100.795,145< r <166, andr >214.4. Ultimately, for r > r p ≈313, the system exhibits a globally attracting limit cycle. For other choices ofσandb, the behavior of the Lorentz equation is similar...

    work page

  74. [74]

    Solon and J

    A. Solon and J. M. Horowitz, On the Einstein relation between mobility and diffusion coefficient in an active bath, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 184002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Pei and C

    J.-H. Pei and C. Maes, Induced friction on a probe moving in a nonequilibrium medium, Phys. Rev. E111, L032101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Y. Huang, Nonlinear stochastic dynamics research on a lorenz system with white gaussian noise based on a quasi-potential approach, International Journal of Mechanical System Dynamics3, 85 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    Kuehn, Moment closure—a brief review, inControl of Self-Organizing Nonlinear Systems, edited by E

    C. Kuehn, Moment closure—a brief review, inControl of Self-Organizing Nonlinear Systems, edited by E. Schöll, S. H. L. Klapp, and P. Hövel (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 253–271

    work page 2016

  79. [79]

    Socha, Equivalent linearization of stochastic dynamic systems under external excitation, inLinearization Methods for Stochastic Dynamic Systems, edited by L

    L. Socha, Equivalent linearization of stochastic dynamic systems under external excitation, inLinearization Methods for Stochastic Dynamic Systems, edited by L. Socha (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 147–210

    work page 2008