High-energy photon hologram of a photon gas

A.A. Sokolov; P.O. Kazinski

arxiv: 2604.21835 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

High-energy photon hologram of a photon gas

P.O. Kazinski , A.A. Sokolov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph

keywords photon gasphoton hologramcoherent scatteringbirefringencedielectric susceptibilitypair creationQED

0 comments

The pith

A photon gas and a single photon act as a birefringent medium in coherent scattering, transparent below the pair-creation threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the photon hologram of a one-particle density matrix for a photon gas, including cases where the probe photon energy exceeds the electron-positron pair creation threshold. It establishes that both the gas and an individual photon induce linear and circular birefringence during coherent photon scattering. The resulting medium transmits probes unchanged below the pair threshold but absorbs them above it. At high energies where the center-of-mass energy greatly exceeds twice the electron mass, the effective response matches a birefringent plasma except for a slow logarithmic scaling. The authors also provide explicit holograms for Gaussian and lattice states and note that these effects could be measured with current facilities.

Core claim

The photon hologram is derived from the one-particle density matrix of a photon gas. Explicit expressions are obtained for states given by a single Gaussian and by coherent and incoherent lattices of Gaussians, along with the conditions for resonant cones of coherent scattering, which differ between the coherent and incoherent cases. The dielectric susceptibility tensor on the probe photon mass shell is obtained for arbitrary quantum states of the gas or a single photon. This tensor shows that the gas and the single photon behave as a medium with linear and circular birefringence that is transparent below the pair-creation threshold and absorbing above it; in the high-energy limit it reduces

What carries the argument

The dielectric susceptibility tensor of the photon gas (or single photon) on the probe photon mass shell, which encodes the induced linear and circular birefringence.

Load-bearing premise

The one-particle density matrix of the photon gas is restricted to single Gaussian or coherent/incoherent lattice forms, the probe photon lies on its mass shell, and the QED calculation remains valid above the pair-creation threshold.

What would settle it

An experiment that scatters GeV-scale photons through a dense eV-scale photon gas and measures polarization-dependent deflection or absorption would falsify the claim if the birefringence pattern or the sharp onset of absorption at the pair threshold is absent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21835 by A.A. Sokolov, P.O. Kazinski.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The parameters η/ρh (left panel), η ′ 1/ρh (middle panel), and η ′ 3/ρh (right panel) determining a variation of the Stokes parameters of the density matrix of a probe photon in scattering by Gaussian in head-on configuration. The mean values of momenta: k 0 s = (0, 0, 1.55) eV and k 0 h = (0, 0, −7) GeV. The matrices of inverse dispersions have the form (96) with σ s ⊥/|k 0 s| = 10−2 , σ s ∥/|k 0 s| = 10−… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The parameters η/ρh (left panel), η ′ 1/ρh (middle panel), and η ′ 3/ρh (right panel) determining a variation of the Stokes parameters of the density matrix of a probe photon in scattering by a coherent lattice. The mean values of momenta: k 0 s = (0, 0, 1.55) eV and k 0 h = (0, 0, −7) GeV. The matrices of inverse dispersions have the form (96) with σ s ⊥/|k 0 s| = 10−3 , σ s ∥/|k 0 s| = 10−3 , σ h ⊥/|k 0 … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The parameters η/ρh (left panel), η ′ 1/ρh (middle panel), and η ′ 3/ρh (right panel) determining a variation of the Stokes parameters of the density matrix of a probe photon in scattering by an incoherent lattice. The mean values of momenta: k 0 s = (0, 0, 1.55) eV and k 0 h = (0, 0, −7) GeV. The matrices of inverse dispersions have the form (96) with σ s ⊥/|k 0 s| = 10−3 , σ s ∥/|k 0 s| = 10−3 , σ h ⊥/|k… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The eigenvalues (165) of the the tensors χ ′ ij (main plot) and χ ′′ ij (inset) as functions of the probe photon energy for the different polarizations of the photon gas. The mean values of momenta: k 0 s = (0, 0, 1.55) eV and k 0 h = (0, 0, −|k 0 h|) eV. The undulator strength parameter Ku = 1. The solid line is for λ+ and the dashed line corresponds to λ−. where we have used the definition of the undulat… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The photon hologram of a one-particle density matrix of a photon gas is derived including the case where the energy of a probe photon is above the electron-positron pair creation threshold. The explicit expressions for the holograms of a photon gas with one-particle density matrix in the form of a single Gaussian and of coherent and incoherent lattices of Gaussians are obtained. The conditions for resonant cones of coherent scattering by coherent and incoherent lattices are found. These conditions turn out to be different. The explicit expression for the dielectric susceptibility tensor of a photon gas and of a single photon prepared in arbitrary quantum states are derived on the probe photon mass-shell. It is established that a photon gas and a single photon behave in coherent photon scattering as a medium with linear and circular birefringence. This medium is transparent below the electron-positron creation threshold and is absorbing otherwise. In the high-energy limit, $\sqrt{s}\gg 2m$, it has the dielectric susceptibility tensor of a birefringent plasma except for a slow logarithmic scaling. It is shown that, for the probe photon energies of order $1$ GeV and higher, the energies of target photons of order $1$ eV and higher, and the photon gas density such that the classical intensity parameter is of order unity, the hologram of the photon gas can be measured with existing experimental facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper works out explicit hologram expressions and the on-shell dielectric tensor for photon gases in Gaussian and lattice states, showing birefringence and absorption above pair threshold with a plasma-like high-energy limit.

read the letter

The core result is a set of concrete formulas for the photon hologram of a one-particle density matrix when the probe sits above the pair-creation threshold. For a single Gaussian and for both coherent and incoherent lattices of Gaussians, they give the scattering pattern and the resonant-cone conditions, which differ between the two lattice types. They also extract the dielectric susceptibility tensor on the probe mass shell and show that the gas acts as a linearly and circularly birefringent medium that is transparent below threshold and absorbing above it; in the ultra-high-energy limit the tensor reduces to that of a birefringent plasma apart from a slow logarithmic factor. The experimental note that the effect could be visible at GeV probe energies with eV target photons and classical intensity parameter of order one is a useful anchor. These explicit expressions and the distinction between coherent and incoherent cases are the genuinely new pieces; they follow from the forward-scattering amplitude in QED applied to the chosen density matrices. The derivations appear self-contained once the states are fixed, and the birefringence claim is a direct consequence of the polarization dependence in the amplitude rather than an added assumption. The main limitations are the restriction to Gaussian forms for the density matrix, the on-shell condition for the probe, and the assumption that ordinary perturbative QED remains adequate above threshold without extra non-perturbative or higher-order contributions. The logarithmic scaling in the high-energy regime will need explicit verification in the full calculation to confirm it is not an artifact of the cutoff or approximation scheme. No circular fitting is visible from the stated steps. This work is aimed at theorists who already think about forward scattering, photon gases in strong fields, or diagnostics in laser-plasma and accelerator environments. A reader who wants ready-to-use expressions for specific states will find them here; someone looking for general theorems or broad phenomenology will get less. The paper is coherent on its own terms and supplies falsifiable predictions for scattering patterns, so it merits a serious referee even though the experimental section is brief and the assumptions are narrow.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives the photon hologram of a one-particle density matrix for a photon gas in coherent scattering, including above the electron-positron pair-creation threshold. Explicit expressions are obtained for a single Gaussian density matrix and for coherent and incoherent lattices of Gaussians; resonant-cone conditions are found and shown to differ between the coherent and incoherent cases. The dielectric susceptibility tensor is derived on the probe-photon mass shell for arbitrary states. The central results are that a photon gas (and a single photon) behaves as a linearly and circularly birefringent medium that is transparent below the pair threshold and absorbing above it; in the high-energy limit √s ≫ 2m the susceptibility reduces to that of a birefringent plasma up to a slow logarithmic factor. Experimental accessibility for GeV-scale probe photons, eV-scale target photons, and classical intensity parameter of order unity is asserted.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies concrete, state-dependent expressions that connect QED forward-scattering amplitudes to effective optical properties (birefringence, absorption, plasma-like response) for photon gases. The explicit treatment of Gaussian and lattice states, the differing resonant conditions, and the high-energy logarithmic correction are technically useful; the claim of measurability with existing facilities supplies a falsifiable prediction that could be tested.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the susceptibility 'has the dielectric susceptibility tensor of a birefringent plasma except for a slow logarithmic scaling,' but the precise form of the logarithmic term and its coefficient are not quoted; including the leading high-energy expression (presumably in §4 or §5) would make the claim immediately verifiable.
[§2] The one-particle density matrices are restricted to single Gaussians and coherent/incoherent lattices; the text should clarify whether the susceptibility formula (Eq. (X)) remains valid for a general density matrix or requires additional assumptions beyond those stated in §2.
Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate the kinematic regime (e.g., √s/2m) and the value of the intensity parameter used for the plotted holograms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of its central results, and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained from standard QED and density-matrix inputs

full rationale

The paper computes the photon hologram and dielectric susceptibility tensor directly from the forward-scattering amplitude in QED for a probe photon on its mass shell interacting with a photon gas whose one-particle density matrix is given in explicit forms (single Gaussian or coherent/incoherent Gaussian lattices). The birefringence, transparency below the pair-creation threshold, absorption above it, and the high-energy plasma-like limit with logarithmic correction all follow from the standard QED amplitude without any parameter fitting, redefinition of inputs as outputs, or load-bearing self-citations that would reduce the central claims to tautology. The explicit expressions for the chosen states are derived rather than presupposed, and the results remain falsifiable against external QED benchmarks or experiment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed from abstract only; the ledger therefore lists only the assumptions that can be inferred from the abstract text. The full paper may contain additional free parameters or ad-hoc choices not visible here.

axioms (2)

standard math Quantum electrodynamics governs photon-photon scattering through virtual electron-positron pairs
Invoked to obtain the dielectric susceptibility tensor on the probe-photon mass shell.
domain assumption The photon gas state is fully specified by a one-particle density matrix of Gaussian or lattice form
Required to derive the explicit hologram expressions and resonant-cone conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1436 out tokens · 64724 ms · 2026-05-09T21:08:25.197851+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

P. O. Kazinski, G. Yu. Lazarenko, Transition radiation from a Dirac-particle wave packet traversing a mirror, Phys. Rev. A103, 012216 (2021)

2021
[2]

P. O. Kazinski, T. V. Solovyev, Coherent radiation of photons by particle wave packets, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 790 (2022)

2022
[3]

P. O. Kazinski, T. V. Solovyev, Susceptibility of a single photon wave packet, Phys. Rev. D108, 016004 (2023)

2023
[4]

P. O. Kazinski, V. A. Ryakin, P. S. Shevchenko, Radiation from Dirac fermions caused by a projective measurement, Phys. Rev. D110, 116011 (2024)

2024
[5]

P. O. Kazinski, Coherent effects in scattering of particle wave packets, in Proceedings of Efim Fradkin Centennial Conference, Moscow, Russia (Lebedev Physical Insitute, Moscow, 2024). https://esf.lpi.ru/proceedings/qft/Kazinski.pdf

2024
[6]

I. M. Akimov, P. O. Kazinski, A. A. Sokolov, Plasmon-polariton modes on a single electron wave packet, Phys. Rev. D111, 036028 (2025)

2025
[7]

P. O. Kazinski, A. A. Sokolov, Coherent elastic scattering of low energy photons by neutrons, arXiv:2510.21645. 28

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[8]

Karplus, M

R. Karplus, M. Neuman, Non-linear interactions between electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev.80, 380 (1950)

1950
[9]

Karplus, M

R. Karplus, M. Neuman, The scattering of light by light, Phys. Rev.83, 776 (1951)

1951
[10]

De Tollis, Dispersive approach to photon-photon scattering, Nuovo Cim.32, 757 (1964)

B. De Tollis, Dispersive approach to photon-photon scattering, Nuovo Cim.32, 757 (1964)

1964
[11]

De Tollis, The scattering of photons by photons, Nuovo Cim.35, 1182 (1965)

B. De Tollis, The scattering of photons by photons, Nuovo Cim.35, 1182 (1965)

1965
[12]

Costantini, B

V. Costantini, B. De Tollis, G. Pistoni, Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics, Nuovo Cim. A 2, 733 (1971)

1971
[13]

A. A. Varfolomeev, Induced scattering of light by light, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.)50, 1024 (1966)

1966
[14]

J. S. Toll, The dispersion relation for light and its application to problems involving electron pairs, PhD Thesis (Princeton University, Princeton, 1952)

1952
[15]

V. A. Bednyakov, D. V. Naumov, Concept of coherence in neutrino and antineutrino scattering off nuclei, Phys. Part. Nucl.52, 39 (2021)

2021
[16]

Gabor, Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts, Proc

D. Gabor, Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A197, 454 (1949)

1949
[17]

P. W. Hawkes, J. C. H. Spence (Eds.),Springer Handbook of Microscopy(Springer, Cham, 2019)

2019
[18]

Di Piazza, K

A. Di Piazza, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, C. H. Keitel, Light diffraction by a strong standing electromagnetic wave, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 083603 (2006)

2006
[19]

Ferrando, H

A. Ferrando, H. Michinel, M. Seco, D. Tommasini, Nonlinear phase shift from photon-photon scattering in vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 150404 (2007)

2007
[20]

B. King, A. Di Piazza, C. H. Keitel, Double-slit vacuum polarization effects in ultraintense laser fields, Phys. Rev. A82, 032114 (2010)

2010
[21]

Tommasini, H

D. Tommasini, H. Michinel, Light by light diffraction in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A82, 011803(R) (2010)

2010
[22]

Battesti, C

R. Battesti, C. Rizzo, Magnetic and electric properties of quantum vacuum, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 016401 (2013)

2013
[23]

V. Dinu, T. Heinzl, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, G. Torgrimsson, Vacuum refractive indices and helicity flip in strong-field QED, Phys. Rev. D89, 125003 (2014)

2014
[24]

V. Dinu, T. Heinzl, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, G. Torgrimsson, Photon polarization in light-by-light scattering: Finite size effects, Phys. Rev. D90, 045025 (2014)

2014
[25]

Karbstein, R

F. Karbstein, R. Shaisultanov, Photon propagation in slowly varying inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D91, 085027 (2015)

2015
[26]

Bragin, S

S. Bragin, S. Meuren, C. H. Keitel, A. Di Piazza, High-energy vacuum birefringence and dichroism in an ultrastrong laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 250403 (2017)

2017
[27]

Karbstein, Vacuum birefringence in the head-on collision of x-ray free-electron laser and optical high-intensity laser pulses, Phys

F. Karbstein, Vacuum birefringence in the head-on collision of x-ray free-electron laser and optical high-intensity laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D98, 056010 (2018)

2018
[28]

Karbstein, D

F. Karbstein, D. Ullmann, E. A. Mosman, M. Zepf, Direct accessibility of the fundamental constants governing light-by-light scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 061802 (2022)

2022
[29]

Fedotov, A

A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Phys. Rep.1010, 1 (2023)

2023
[30]

Ahmadiniazet al., Detection schemes for quantum vacuum diffraction and birefringence, Phys

N. Ahmadiniazet al., Detection schemes for quantum vacuum diffraction and birefringence, Phys. Rev. D108, 076005 (2023). 29

2023
[31]

Wanget al., Exploring the quantum vacuum via ultraintense laser-induced refraction of light, New J

J. Wanget al., Exploring the quantum vacuum via ultraintense laser-induced refraction of light, New J. Phys.26, 023008 (2024)

2024
[32]

A. V. Berezin, A. M. Fedotov, Analytical formula for signal optimization in stimulated photon-photon scattering setup with three laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D110, 016009 (2024)

2024
[33]

Šmidet al., Proof-of-principle experiment for the dark-field detection concept for measuring vacuum birefringence, Phys

M. Šmidet al., Proof-of-principle experiment for the dark-field detection concept for measuring vacuum birefringence, Phys. Rev. A112, 063512 (2025)

2025
[34]

H. G. Rinderknechtet al., On measuring stimulated photon–photon scattering using multiple ultrain- tense lasers, Phys. Plasmas32, 083301 (2025)

2025
[35]

N. Ahmadiniazet al., Towards a vacuum birefringence experiment at the Helmholtz International Beamline for Extreme Fields (Letter of Intent of the BIREF HIBEF Collaboration), High Power Laser Science and Engineering13, e7 (2025)

2025
[36]

Matheron, M

A. Matheron, M. Šmid, M. Zepf, F. Karbstein, Simulating vacuum birefringence with a diffractive beam propagation code, Phys. Rev. D113, 033005 (2026)

2026
[37]

Bialynicka-Birula, I

Z. Bialynicka-Birula, I. Bialynicki-Birula, Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics. Photon prop- agation and photon splitting in an external field, Phys. Rev. D2, 2341 (1970)

1970
[38]

Marklund, P

M. Marklund, P. K. Shukla, Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interac- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 591 (2006)

2006
[39]

Karbstein, E

F. Karbstein, E. A. Mosman, Enhancing quantum vacuum signatures with tailored laser beams, Phys. Rev. D101, 113002 (2020)

2020
[40]

Valialshchikov, F

M. Valialshchikov, F. Karbstein, D. Seipt, M. Zepf, Back reflection in dipole fields and beyond, Phys. Rev. D112, 116012 (2025)

2025
[41]

Z. Bu, L. Zhang, S. Liu, B. Shen, R. Li, I. P. Ivanov, L. Ji, Super light-by-light scattering in vacuum induced by intense vortex lasers, Commun. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02556-0

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-026-02556-0 2026
[42]

Becker, H

W. Becker, H. Mitter, Vacuum polarization in laser fields, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.8, 1638 (1975)

1975
[43]

V. N. Baier, A. I. Milstein, V. M. Strakhovenko, Interaction between a photon and an intense electro- magnetic wave, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.69, 1893 (1975) [Sov. Phys. JETP42, 961 (1976)]

1975
[44]

Q. Yu, D. Xu, B. Shen, T. E. Cowan, H.-P. Schlenvoigt, X-ray polarimetry and its application to strong-field quantum electrodynamics, High Power Laser Science and Engineering11, e71 (2023)

2023
[45]

Nakamiya, K

Y. Nakamiya, K. Homma, Probing vacuum birefringence under a high-intensity laser field with gamma- ray polarimetry at the GeV scale, Phys. Rev. D96, 053002 (2017)

2017
[46]

Takahashiet al., Light-by-light scattering in a photon-photon collider, Eur

T. Takahashiet al., Light-by-light scattering in a photon-photon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 893 (2018)

2018
[47]

Ellis, N

J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, P. Roloff, T. You, Light-by-light scattering at futuree+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 634 (2022)

2022
[48]

Budkeret al., Expanding nuclear physics horizons with the Gamma Factory, Ann

D. Budkeret al., Expanding nuclear physics horizons with the Gamma Factory, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 534, 2100284 (2022)

2022
[49]

V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, L. P. Pitaevskii,Quantum Electrodynamics(Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 1982)

1982
[50]

F. A. Berezin, Feynman path integrals in a phase space, Sov. Phys. Usp.23, 763 (1980)

1980
[51]

G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, Polarization of high-energyγ-quanta traversing a bunch of polarized laser photons, Phys. Lett. B413, 122 (1997)

1997
[52]

V. A. Maisheev, Propagation of a beam of gamma rays in the field of a monochromatic laser wave, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.112, 2016 (1997) [JETP85, 1102 (1997)]. 30

2016
[53]

R. F. Sawyer, Collective polarization exchanges in collisions of photon clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 133601 (2004)

2004
[54]

Bellucci, V

S. Bellucci, V. A. Maisheev, Photon emission and electron-positron photoproduction processes in the planar field of a bent single crystal, Phys. Rev. A86, 042902 (2012)

2012
[55]

P. O. Kazinski, P. S. Korolev, V. A. Ryakin, Detection of twisted radiowaves with Rydberg atoms, Annals Phys.488, 170378 (2026)

2026
[56]

V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, V. M. Strakhovenko,Electromagnetic Processes at High Energies in Ori- ented Single Crystals(World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)

1998
[57]

V. G. Bagrov, G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, V. A. Bordovitsyn, A. V. Borisov, O. F. Dorofeev, V. Ya. Epp, V. S. Gushchina, V. C. Zhukovskii,Synchrotron Radiation Theory and its Development(World Scientific, Singapore, 1999)

1999
[58]

Hajima, M

R. Hajima, M. Fujiwara, Narrow-band GeV photons generated from an x-ray free-electron laser oscil- lator, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams19, 020702 (2016)

2016
[59]

Bernard, T

D. Bernard, T. Chattopadhyay, F. Kislat, N. Produit, Gamma-ray polarimetry, inHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysicsedited by C. Bambi, A. Santangelo (Springer, Singapore, 2022)

2022
[60]

P. O. Kazinski, P. S. Korolev, Scattering of plane-wave and twisted photons by helical media, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 395301 (2022)

2022
[61]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz,Electrodynamics of Continuous Media(Pergamon, Oxford, 1984)

1984
[62]

I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products(Acad. Press, Boston, 1994)

1994
[63]

Liet al., High-intensity lasers and research activities in China, High Power Laser Science and Engineering13, e12 (2025)

Y. Liet al., High-intensity lasers and research activities in China, High Power Laser Science and Engineering13, e12 (2025). 31

2025

[1] [1]

P. O. Kazinski, G. Yu. Lazarenko, Transition radiation from a Dirac-particle wave packet traversing a mirror, Phys. Rev. A103, 012216 (2021)

2021

[2] [2]

P. O. Kazinski, T. V. Solovyev, Coherent radiation of photons by particle wave packets, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 790 (2022)

2022

[3] [3]

P. O. Kazinski, T. V. Solovyev, Susceptibility of a single photon wave packet, Phys. Rev. D108, 016004 (2023)

2023

[4] [4]

P. O. Kazinski, V. A. Ryakin, P. S. Shevchenko, Radiation from Dirac fermions caused by a projective measurement, Phys. Rev. D110, 116011 (2024)

2024

[5] [5]

P. O. Kazinski, Coherent effects in scattering of particle wave packets, in Proceedings of Efim Fradkin Centennial Conference, Moscow, Russia (Lebedev Physical Insitute, Moscow, 2024). https://esf.lpi.ru/proceedings/qft/Kazinski.pdf

2024

[6] [6]

I. M. Akimov, P. O. Kazinski, A. A. Sokolov, Plasmon-polariton modes on a single electron wave packet, Phys. Rev. D111, 036028 (2025)

2025

[7] [7]

P. O. Kazinski, A. A. Sokolov, Coherent elastic scattering of low energy photons by neutrons, arXiv:2510.21645. 28

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

[8] [8]

Karplus, M

R. Karplus, M. Neuman, Non-linear interactions between electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev.80, 380 (1950)

1950

[9] [9]

Karplus, M

R. Karplus, M. Neuman, The scattering of light by light, Phys. Rev.83, 776 (1951)

1951

[10] [10]

De Tollis, Dispersive approach to photon-photon scattering, Nuovo Cim.32, 757 (1964)

B. De Tollis, Dispersive approach to photon-photon scattering, Nuovo Cim.32, 757 (1964)

1964

[11] [11]

De Tollis, The scattering of photons by photons, Nuovo Cim.35, 1182 (1965)

B. De Tollis, The scattering of photons by photons, Nuovo Cim.35, 1182 (1965)

1965

[12] [12]

Costantini, B

V. Costantini, B. De Tollis, G. Pistoni, Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics, Nuovo Cim. A 2, 733 (1971)

1971

[13] [13]

A. A. Varfolomeev, Induced scattering of light by light, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.)50, 1024 (1966)

1966

[14] [14]

J. S. Toll, The dispersion relation for light and its application to problems involving electron pairs, PhD Thesis (Princeton University, Princeton, 1952)

1952

[15] [15]

V. A. Bednyakov, D. V. Naumov, Concept of coherence in neutrino and antineutrino scattering off nuclei, Phys. Part. Nucl.52, 39 (2021)

2021

[16] [16]

Gabor, Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts, Proc

D. Gabor, Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A197, 454 (1949)

1949

[17] [17]

P. W. Hawkes, J. C. H. Spence (Eds.),Springer Handbook of Microscopy(Springer, Cham, 2019)

2019

[18] [18]

Di Piazza, K

A. Di Piazza, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, C. H. Keitel, Light diffraction by a strong standing electromagnetic wave, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 083603 (2006)

2006

[19] [19]

Ferrando, H

A. Ferrando, H. Michinel, M. Seco, D. Tommasini, Nonlinear phase shift from photon-photon scattering in vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 150404 (2007)

2007

[20] [20]

B. King, A. Di Piazza, C. H. Keitel, Double-slit vacuum polarization effects in ultraintense laser fields, Phys. Rev. A82, 032114 (2010)

2010

[21] [21]

Tommasini, H

D. Tommasini, H. Michinel, Light by light diffraction in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A82, 011803(R) (2010)

2010

[22] [22]

Battesti, C

R. Battesti, C. Rizzo, Magnetic and electric properties of quantum vacuum, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 016401 (2013)

2013

[23] [23]

V. Dinu, T. Heinzl, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, G. Torgrimsson, Vacuum refractive indices and helicity flip in strong-field QED, Phys. Rev. D89, 125003 (2014)

2014

[24] [24]

V. Dinu, T. Heinzl, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, G. Torgrimsson, Photon polarization in light-by-light scattering: Finite size effects, Phys. Rev. D90, 045025 (2014)

2014

[25] [25]

Karbstein, R

F. Karbstein, R. Shaisultanov, Photon propagation in slowly varying inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D91, 085027 (2015)

2015

[26] [26]

Bragin, S

S. Bragin, S. Meuren, C. H. Keitel, A. Di Piazza, High-energy vacuum birefringence and dichroism in an ultrastrong laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 250403 (2017)

2017

[27] [27]

Karbstein, Vacuum birefringence in the head-on collision of x-ray free-electron laser and optical high-intensity laser pulses, Phys

F. Karbstein, Vacuum birefringence in the head-on collision of x-ray free-electron laser and optical high-intensity laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D98, 056010 (2018)

2018

[28] [28]

Karbstein, D

F. Karbstein, D. Ullmann, E. A. Mosman, M. Zepf, Direct accessibility of the fundamental constants governing light-by-light scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 061802 (2022)

2022

[29] [29]

Fedotov, A

A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, G. Torgrimsson, Advances in QED with intense background fields, Phys. Rep.1010, 1 (2023)

2023

[30] [30]

Ahmadiniazet al., Detection schemes for quantum vacuum diffraction and birefringence, Phys

N. Ahmadiniazet al., Detection schemes for quantum vacuum diffraction and birefringence, Phys. Rev. D108, 076005 (2023). 29

2023

[31] [31]

Wanget al., Exploring the quantum vacuum via ultraintense laser-induced refraction of light, New J

J. Wanget al., Exploring the quantum vacuum via ultraintense laser-induced refraction of light, New J. Phys.26, 023008 (2024)

2024

[32] [32]

A. V. Berezin, A. M. Fedotov, Analytical formula for signal optimization in stimulated photon-photon scattering setup with three laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D110, 016009 (2024)

2024

[33] [33]

Šmidet al., Proof-of-principle experiment for the dark-field detection concept for measuring vacuum birefringence, Phys

M. Šmidet al., Proof-of-principle experiment for the dark-field detection concept for measuring vacuum birefringence, Phys. Rev. A112, 063512 (2025)

2025

[34] [34]

H. G. Rinderknechtet al., On measuring stimulated photon–photon scattering using multiple ultrain- tense lasers, Phys. Plasmas32, 083301 (2025)

2025

[35] [35]

N. Ahmadiniazet al., Towards a vacuum birefringence experiment at the Helmholtz International Beamline for Extreme Fields (Letter of Intent of the BIREF HIBEF Collaboration), High Power Laser Science and Engineering13, e7 (2025)

2025

[36] [36]

Matheron, M

A. Matheron, M. Šmid, M. Zepf, F. Karbstein, Simulating vacuum birefringence with a diffractive beam propagation code, Phys. Rev. D113, 033005 (2026)

2026

[37] [37]

Bialynicka-Birula, I

Z. Bialynicka-Birula, I. Bialynicki-Birula, Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics. Photon prop- agation and photon splitting in an external field, Phys. Rev. D2, 2341 (1970)

1970

[38] [38]

Marklund, P

M. Marklund, P. K. Shukla, Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interac- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 591 (2006)

2006

[39] [39]

Karbstein, E

F. Karbstein, E. A. Mosman, Enhancing quantum vacuum signatures with tailored laser beams, Phys. Rev. D101, 113002 (2020)

2020

[40] [40]

Valialshchikov, F

M. Valialshchikov, F. Karbstein, D. Seipt, M. Zepf, Back reflection in dipole fields and beyond, Phys. Rev. D112, 116012 (2025)

2025

[41] [41]

Z. Bu, L. Zhang, S. Liu, B. Shen, R. Li, I. P. Ivanov, L. Ji, Super light-by-light scattering in vacuum induced by intense vortex lasers, Commun. Phys. (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02556-0

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-026-02556-0 2026

[42] [42]

Becker, H

W. Becker, H. Mitter, Vacuum polarization in laser fields, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.8, 1638 (1975)

1975

[43] [43]

V. N. Baier, A. I. Milstein, V. M. Strakhovenko, Interaction between a photon and an intense electro- magnetic wave, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.69, 1893 (1975) [Sov. Phys. JETP42, 961 (1976)]

1975

[44] [44]

Q. Yu, D. Xu, B. Shen, T. E. Cowan, H.-P. Schlenvoigt, X-ray polarimetry and its application to strong-field quantum electrodynamics, High Power Laser Science and Engineering11, e71 (2023)

2023

[45] [45]

Nakamiya, K

Y. Nakamiya, K. Homma, Probing vacuum birefringence under a high-intensity laser field with gamma- ray polarimetry at the GeV scale, Phys. Rev. D96, 053002 (2017)

2017

[46] [46]

Takahashiet al., Light-by-light scattering in a photon-photon collider, Eur

T. Takahashiet al., Light-by-light scattering in a photon-photon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 893 (2018)

2018

[47] [47]

Ellis, N

J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, P. Roloff, T. You, Light-by-light scattering at futuree+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 634 (2022)

2022

[48] [48]

Budkeret al., Expanding nuclear physics horizons with the Gamma Factory, Ann

D. Budkeret al., Expanding nuclear physics horizons with the Gamma Factory, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 534, 2100284 (2022)

2022

[49] [49]

V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, L. P. Pitaevskii,Quantum Electrodynamics(Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 1982)

1982

[50] [50]

F. A. Berezin, Feynman path integrals in a phase space, Sov. Phys. Usp.23, 763 (1980)

1980

[51] [51]

G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, Polarization of high-energyγ-quanta traversing a bunch of polarized laser photons, Phys. Lett. B413, 122 (1997)

1997

[52] [52]

V. A. Maisheev, Propagation of a beam of gamma rays in the field of a monochromatic laser wave, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.112, 2016 (1997) [JETP85, 1102 (1997)]. 30

2016

[53] [53]

R. F. Sawyer, Collective polarization exchanges in collisions of photon clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 133601 (2004)

2004

[54] [54]

Bellucci, V

S. Bellucci, V. A. Maisheev, Photon emission and electron-positron photoproduction processes in the planar field of a bent single crystal, Phys. Rev. A86, 042902 (2012)

2012

[55] [55]

P. O. Kazinski, P. S. Korolev, V. A. Ryakin, Detection of twisted radiowaves with Rydberg atoms, Annals Phys.488, 170378 (2026)

2026

[56] [56]

V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, V. M. Strakhovenko,Electromagnetic Processes at High Energies in Ori- ented Single Crystals(World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)

1998

[57] [57]

V. G. Bagrov, G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, V. A. Bordovitsyn, A. V. Borisov, O. F. Dorofeev, V. Ya. Epp, V. S. Gushchina, V. C. Zhukovskii,Synchrotron Radiation Theory and its Development(World Scientific, Singapore, 1999)

1999

[58] [58]

Hajima, M

R. Hajima, M. Fujiwara, Narrow-band GeV photons generated from an x-ray free-electron laser oscil- lator, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams19, 020702 (2016)

2016

[59] [59]

Bernard, T

D. Bernard, T. Chattopadhyay, F. Kislat, N. Produit, Gamma-ray polarimetry, inHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysicsedited by C. Bambi, A. Santangelo (Springer, Singapore, 2022)

2022

[60] [60]

P. O. Kazinski, P. S. Korolev, Scattering of plane-wave and twisted photons by helical media, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 395301 (2022)

2022

[61] [61]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz,Electrodynamics of Continuous Media(Pergamon, Oxford, 1984)

1984

[62] [62]

I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products(Acad. Press, Boston, 1994)

1994

[63] [63]

Liet al., High-intensity lasers and research activities in China, High Power Laser Science and Engineering13, e12 (2025)

Y. Liet al., High-intensity lasers and research activities in China, High Power Laser Science and Engineering13, e12 (2025). 31

2025