pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21969 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Dive deeper with SUBMARINE: SUB-Mev dArk matter diRect detectIon using bilayer grapheNE

Rinchen Sherpa , Anuvab Sarkar , Tarak Nath Maity , Paramita Dutta , Ranjan Laha , Anirban Das
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph cond-mat.mes-hallhep-ex
keywords bilayer graphenedark matter detectionsub-MeV dark matteranisotropic responsesidereal modulationelectronic excitationsdirect detectionmassive mediator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bilayer graphene detects sub-MeV dark matter particles through electronic excitations, reaching new parameter space with 0.5 mg-year exposure while showing sidereal-day modulation from its anisotropy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that bilayer graphene works as a target for direct detection of dark matter masses below one MeV by scattering that excites electrons. Calculations with a massive mediator demonstrate that an exposure of roughly half a milligram for one year already covers previously unexplored combinations of dark matter mass and interaction strength. The material's response varies with direction relative to the incoming particles, so the observed rate changes over each sidereal day according to the detector's orientation against the galactic dark matter wind. This built-in daily variation supplies an extra handle for confirming a real signal against steady backgrounds. The results encourage building experiments around bilayer graphene to test whether dark matter consists of light particles.

Core claim

Bilayer graphene detects sub-MeV mass dark matter via scattering with a massive mediator, where the anisotropic electronic response function produces a sidereal-day modulation in the scattering rate that depends on orientation to the galactic dark matter wind, and an exposure of approximately 0.5 mg-year is sufficient to probe new regions of parameter space.

What carries the argument

The anisotropic electronic response function of bilayer graphene, which sets the direction-dependent probability of electron excitations and thereby generates the daily modulation in detected events.

If this is right

  • Exposures of only 0.5 mg-year suffice to explore new combinations of sub-MeV dark matter mass and coupling strength.
  • The scattering rate exhibits significant sidereal-day modulation for sub-MeV masses.
  • The size of the modulation depends on the detector's orientation relative to the galactic dark matter wind.
  • Bilayer graphene provides a viable path for future direct-detection experiments targeting light dark matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Controlled beam tests with known low-energy particles could confirm the modulation pattern before scaling to underground searches.
  • The daily variation supplies an independent way to reject steady backgrounds that lack directional dependence.
  • Stacking bilayer graphene with other two-dimensional materials might improve both sensitivity and directional resolution.
  • A positive detection would directly constrain the mass and interaction type of light dark matter beyond existing bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The scattering rate calculation assumes a specific massive mediator and that the electronic response function of bilayer graphene is modeled accurately without significant uncertainties from material defects or background processes.

What would settle it

Absence of the predicted sidereal-day modulation in the scattering rate, or measured rates that fall outside the calculated range, in an oriented bilayer graphene detector exposed to sub-MeV dark matter candidates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21969 by Anirban Das, Anuvab Sarkar, Paramita Dutta, Ranjan Laha, Rinchen Sherpa, Tarak Nath Maity.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left: Lattice structure of bilayer graphene consisting of four inequivalent sites labelled by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Band structure of bilayer graphene along along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Color plot of BLG energy-loss function (ELF) as a function of in-plane momentum transfer ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Differential DM-electron scattering rate via massless (left) and massive mediator (right) in BLG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top: Projected sensitivity on the upper limit of DM-electron scattering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Illustration of rotation of the Earth and change of orientation of BLG with respect to DM wind (top). Effect of BLG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Daily modulation of DM-electron scattering rate via massless mediator (left) and massive mediator (right) in BLG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The kinematic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The kinematic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Novel target materials with anisotropic response will play a key role in detecting low-mass dark matter in upcoming experiments. Bilayer graphene is one such material that has been proposed for the detection of sub-MeV mass dark matter particles via electronic excitations. In this work, we calculate scattering rate via a massive mediator in bilayer graphene. With an exposure as small as $\sim$ 0.5 mg-year, bilayer graphene can probe new regions of the parameter space. The anisotropic response function of bilayer graphene leads to a sidereal-day modulation in the scattering rate, depending on its orientation with respect to the Galactic dark matter wind. We find significant modulation in the scattering rate for sub-MeV mass dark matter, demonstrating bilayer graphene's promise for a future experiment. We hope that our work will motivate the community to investigate bilayer graphene as a novel target material, and that it may lead us to discover the particle nature of dark matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the dark matter-electron scattering rate in bilayer graphene for a massive mediator. It claims that an exposure of ∼0.5 mg-year suffices to probe new regions of sub-MeV dark matter parameter space. The anisotropic electronic response produces a sidereal-day modulation in the rate whose amplitude depends on detector orientation relative to the galactic DM wind; this modulation is reported as significant for sub-MeV masses. The work positions bilayer graphene as a promising target and calls for experimental follow-up.

Significance. If the idealized rate calculation survives realistic conditions, the result would identify a low-mass, low-exposure target with built-in directional sensitivity via daily modulation. This combination is uncommon among proposed sub-MeV detectors and could meaningfully expand the searchable parameter space while providing a falsifiable signature. The emphasis on anisotropy and modulation is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [scattering-rate calculation (post-abstract results)] The central sensitivity claim (abstract and scattering-rate results) rests on an idealized electronic response function with no accompanying error budget or simulation of material defects, adsorbates, substrate effects, or irreducible backgrounds (radiogenic electrons, cosmic-ray secondaries). Even moderate suppression would increase the required exposure and could wash out the reported sidereal modulation; this assumption is load-bearing for both the 0.5 mg-year prospect and the modulation signature.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the mediator is 'massive' but does not specify the mass range or coupling assumptions used in the rate formula; adding a brief statement would improve clarity.
  2. [figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly note the assumed DM velocity distribution and mediator mass to allow immediate comparison with other calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the major comment below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the discussion of limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [scattering-rate calculation (post-abstract results)] The central sensitivity claim (abstract and scattering-rate results) rests on an idealized electronic response function with no accompanying error budget or simulation of material defects, adsorbates, substrate effects, or irreducible backgrounds (radiogenic electrons, cosmic-ray secondaries). Even moderate suppression would increase the required exposure and could wash out the reported sidereal modulation; this assumption is load-bearing for both the 0.5 mg-year prospect and the modulation signature.

    Authors: We agree that our scattering-rate calculations and sensitivity projections assume an idealized electronic response function for pristine bilayer graphene. This is the standard starting point for theoretical proposals of novel detector materials, allowing us to isolate the intrinsic advantages of the anisotropic band structure for sub-MeV DM-electron scattering and sidereal modulation. We acknowledge that material defects, adsorbates, substrate effects, and backgrounds could suppress rates and potentially reduce the modulation amplitude. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated discussion subsection that qualitatively addresses these effects, notes that the directional modulation signature is tied to the crystal anisotropy (which may remain observable even under moderate imperfections), and emphasizes that the 0.5 mg-year figure represents an ideal-case benchmark. A full quantitative error budget or Monte Carlo simulation of backgrounds lies outside the scope of this work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A detailed quantitative error budget and simulations of defects, adsorbates, substrate effects, and irreducible backgrounds cannot be provided without experimental characterization data and dedicated modeling resources not available in this theoretical study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper computes the DM-electron scattering rate in bilayer graphene for a massive mediator, then derives sensitivity (0.5 mg-year exposure) and sidereal modulation directly from the material's stated anisotropic response function plus the standard galactic DM velocity distribution. No equations reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-definitions, no load-bearing self-citations are invoked for uniqueness or ansatze, and the central claims do not rename known results or smuggle inputs via prior work. The chain relies on external inputs (material response, astrophysics) that are independent of the target conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard dark-matter scattering kinematics, an assumed massive mediator, and a pre-existing model of bilayer graphene's anisotropic electronic response function; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dark matter follows a standard galactic velocity distribution and interacts via a massive mediator.
    Invoked to compute the scattering rate in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Bilayer graphene possesses a well-characterized anisotropic electronic response function suitable for sub-MeV excitations.
    Required for both the rate calculation and the sidereal modulation prediction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1196 out tokens · 31197 ms · 2026-05-09T21:02:39.551837+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In the pres- ence of an applied gate voltageU,ε A1 =ε B1 =−U/2 andε A2 =ε B2 =U/2, and we use other parameters as γ0 = 3.16 eV,γ 1 = 0.381 eV,γ 3 = 0.38 eV,γ 4 = 0.14 eV [77, 79]

    cos(kxa/2). In the pres- ence of an applied gate voltageU,ε A1 =ε B1 =−U/2 andε A2 =ε B2 =U/2, and we use other parameters as γ0 = 3.16 eV,γ 1 = 0.381 eV,γ 3 = 0.38 eV,γ 4 = 0.14 eV [77, 79]. By diagonalizing the matrixHof Eq. (3), we obtain the energy dispersion, which is shown along K− →Γ→K + andK + →M→K − paths in Fig. 2. The valence and conduction ban...

    2025

  2. [2]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, Dark matter, (2024), arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D31, 3059 (1985)

    1985

  4. [4]

    F. Acerbiet al.(DarkSide-50, DarkSide-20k), Sensitiv- ity to low-mass WIMPs with an improved liquid ar- gon ionization response model within the DarkSide pro- gramme, (2025), arXiv:2511.13629 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Angloheret al.(CRESST), Description of CRESST- III lithium aluminate data, (2025), arXiv:2508.03770 [hep-ex]

    G. Angloheret al.(CRESST), Description of CRESST- III lithium aluminate data, (2025), arXiv:2508.03770 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys

    Z. Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 011805 (2025), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    J. Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 011802 (2025), arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Aprileet al.[XENON], Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 221003 (2025), arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Boehm and P

    C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Scalar dark matter candidates, Nucl. Phys. B683, 219 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0305261

    work page arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    S. Gori, S. Knapen, T. Lin, P. Munbodh, and B. Suter, Spin-dependent scattering of sub-GeV dark matter: Models and constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, 075019 (2025), arXiv:2506.11191 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Berlin and N

    A. Berlin and N. Blinov, Thermal Dark Matter Be- low an MeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 021801 (2018), arXiv:1706.07046 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and A. Reinert, Light(ly)- coupled dark matter in the kev range: freeze-in and constraints, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 10.1007/jhep03(2021)141 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)141 2021

  13. [13]

    K. M. Zurek, Dark Matter Candidates of a Very Low Mass, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.74, 287 (2024), arXiv:2401.03025 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Kuflik, M

    E. Kuflik, M. Perelstein, N. R.-L. Lorier, and Y.-D. Tsai, Elastically decoupling dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221302 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Hochberg, E

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky, and J. G. Wacker, Mechanism for thermal relic dark matter of strongly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 171301 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Essiget al., Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detec- tion in the next decade, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2203.08297 [hep-ph]

    R. Essiget al., Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detec- tion in the next decade, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2203.08297 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    , Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (2022) 066901 [arXiv:2108.03239]. [226]SI DM/electron scattering. R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky,\Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Mat- ter

    Y. Kahn and T. Lin, Searches for light dark matter us- ing condensed matter systems, Rept. Prog. Phys.85, 066901 (2022), arXiv:2108.03239 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Hochberg, M

    Y. Hochberg, M. Khalaf, A. Lenoci, and R. Ovadia, De- termining (All) Dark Matter-Electron Scattering Rates From Material Properties, (2025), arXiv:2510.25835 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Taufertsh¨ ofer, V

    N. Taufertsh¨ ofer, V. Zema, R. Catena, V. Olevano, and N. A. Spaldin, Excitonic contributions to dark matter- electron scattering, (2025), arXiv:2507.14345 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Liang, Y

    J.-H. Liang, Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma, and H.-L. Wang, Revis- iting general dark matter-bound-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. D110, L091701 (2024), arXiv:2405.04855 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Catena and M

    R. Catena and M. Iglicki, A general upper bound on the light dark matter scattering rate in materials, JCAP08, 088, arXiv:2501.18261 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Catena and N

    R. Catena and N. A. Spaldin, Linear response theory for light dark matter-electron scattering in materials, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033230 (2024), arXiv:2402.06817 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Catena, T

    R. Catena, T. Emken, M. Matas, N. A. Spaldin, and E. Urdshals, Crystal responses to general dark matter- electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033149 (2021), arXiv:2105.02233 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Catena, T

    R. Catena, T. Emken, N. A. Spaldin, and W. Tarantino, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron inter- actions, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033195 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Res. 7, 019001 (2025)], arXiv:1912.08204 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [26]

    Dark matter-electron scattering in dielectrics,

    S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Dark matter- electron scattering in dielectrics, Phys. Rev. D104, 015031 (2021), arXiv:2101.08275 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [27]

    R. M. Geilhufe, F. Kahlhoefer, and M. W. Winkler, Dirac Materials for Sub-MeV Dark Matter Detection: New Targets and Improved Formalism, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055005 (2020), arXiv:1910.02091 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [28]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, K. M. Zurek, A. G. Grushin, R. Ilan, S. M. Griffin, Z.-F. Liu, S. F. Weber, and J. B. Neaton, Detection of sub-MeV Dark Matter with Three-Dimensional Dirac Materials, Phys. Rev. D 18 97, 015004 (2018), arXiv:1708.08929 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  28. [29]

    Huang, C

    Z. Huang, C. Lane, S. E. Grefe, S. Nandy, B. Fauseweh, S. Paschen, Q. Si, and J.-X. Zhu, Dark Matter Detection with Strongly Correlated Topological Materials: Flat- band Effect, (2023), arXiv:2305.19967 [cond-mat.str- el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [30]

    Essig, J

    R. Essig, J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, H. Ramani, and O. Slone, Direct Detection of Spin-(In)dependent Nuclear Scat- tering of Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using Molecular Ex- citations, Phys. Rev. Research.1, 033105 (2019), arXiv:1907.07682 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  30. [31]

    Blanco, B

    C. Blanco, B. Lillard, and J. D. Shergold, A Numerical Method for the Efficient Calculation of Scattering Form Factors, (2025), arXiv:2512.18010 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    Blanco, Y

    C. Blanco, Y. Kahn, B. Lillard, and S. D. McDer- mott, Dark Matter Daily Modulation With Anisotropic Organic Crystals, Phys. Rev. D104, 036011 (2021), arXiv:2103.08601 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [33]

    , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 056001 [arXiv:1912.02822]. J. I. Collar,\Search for a nonrelativistic component in the spectrum of cosmic rays at Earth

    C. Blanco, J. I. Collar, Y. Kahn, and B. Lillard, Dark Matter-Electron Scattering from Aromatic Or- ganic Targets, Phys. Rev. D101, 056001 (2020), arXiv:1912.02822 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [34]

    S. A. Hertel, A. Biekert, J. Lin, V. Velan, and D. N. McKinsey, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter us- ing a superfluid 4He target, Phys. Rev. D100, 092007 (2019), arXiv:1810.06283 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [35]

    Anthony-Petersenet al.(SPICE, HeRALD), Demon- stration of the HeRALD superfluid helium detec- tor concept, Phys

    R. Anthony-Petersenet al.(SPICE, HeRALD), Demon- stration of the HeRALD superfluid helium detec- tor concept, Phys. Rev. D110, 072006 (2024), arXiv:2307.11877 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    H. J. Maris, G. M. Seidel, and D. Stein, Dark Matter De- tection Using Helium Evaporation and Field Ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 181303 (2017), arXiv:1706.00117 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2017

  36. [37]

    Blanco, I

    C. Blanco, I. Harris, Y. Kahn, B. Lillard, and J. P´ erez- R´ ıos, Molecular Migdal effect, Phys. Rev. D106, 115015 (2022), arXiv:2208.09002 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [38]

    Liang, C

    Z.-L. Liang, C. Mo, F. Zheng, and P. Zhang, Phonon-mediated Migdal effect in semiconductor de- tectors, Phys. Rev. D106, 043004 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 106, 109901 (2022)], arXiv:2205.03395 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [39]

    K. V. Berghaus, A. Esposito, R. Essig, and M. Shola- purkar, The Migdal effect in semiconductors for dark matter with masses below∼100 MeV, JHEP01, 023, arXiv:2210.06490 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  39. [40]

    Coskuner, T

    A. Coskuner, T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Directional detectability of dark matter with single phonon excitations: Target comparison, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015010 (2022), arXiv:2102.09567 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [41]

    Detection of Light Dark Matter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials,

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, M. Pyle, and K. M. Zurek, De- tection of Light Dark Matter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials, Phys. Lett. B785, 386 (2018), arXiv:1712.06598 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  41. [42]

    Multi-Channel Direct Detection of Light Dark Matter: Theoretical Framework,

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, K. M. Zurek, K. Inzani, and S. M. Griffin, Multi-Channel Direct Detection of Light Dark Matter: Theoretical Framework, JHEP03, 036, arXiv:1910.08092 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1910

  42. [43]

    Stratman and T

    C. Stratman and T. Lin, Daily modulation of low-energy nuclear recoils from sub-GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 043030 (2025), arXiv:2411.03433 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    Mitridate, K

    A. Mitridate, K. Pardo, T. Trickle, and K. M. Zurek, Effective field theory for dark matter absorption on single phonons, Phys. Rev. D109, 015010 (2024), arXiv:2308.06314 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [45]

    , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 201801 [arXiv:1905.13744]. [244]Absorption of light DM. H. An, M. Pospelov and J. Pradler,\Dark Matter Detectors as Dark Pho- ton Helioscopes

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Detecting Light Dark Matter with Magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 201801 (2020), arXiv:1905.13744 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [46]

    Esposito and S

    A. Esposito and S. Pavaskar, Optimal antiferromag- nets for light dark matter detection, Phys. Rev. D108, L011901 (2023), arXiv:2210.13516 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [47]

    Marocco and J

    G. Marocco and J. Wheater, Spin-dependent dark mat- ter scattering in quasi-two-dimensional magnets, Phys. Rev. D112, 035030 (2025), arXiv:2501.18120 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    Berlin, A

    A. Berlin, A. J. Millar, T. Trickle, and K. Zhou, De- termining spin-dependent light dark matter rates from neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. D112, 035021 (2025), arXiv:2504.02927 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    O. A. Ashour and S. M. Griffin, Pressure-Tunable Tar- gets for Light Dark Matter Direct Detection: The Case of Solid Helium, (2024), arXiv:2409.02439 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [50]

    Hochberg, M

    Y. Hochberg, M. Khalaf, N. Kurinsky, A. Lenoci, and R. Ovadia, Probing Dark Matter-Electron In- teractions with Superconducting Qubits, (2026), arXiv:2601.02474 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [51]

    A. Das, N. Kurinsky, and R. K. Leane, Dark Matter Induced Power in Quantum Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 121801 (2024), arXiv:2210.09313 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [52]

    A. Das, N. Kurinsky, and R. K. Leane, Transmon Qubit constraints on dark matter-nucleon scattering, JHEP 07, 233, arXiv:2405.00112 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  52. [53]

    Crisler, R

    M. Crisler, R. Essig, J. Estrada, G. Fernandez, J. Tiff- enberg, M. Sofo haro, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu (SEN- SEI), SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Constraints on sub-GeV Dark Matter from a Surface Run, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061803 (2018), arXiv:1804.00088 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2018

  53. [54]

    Arnquistet al.(DAMIC-M), First Constraints from DAMIC-M on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Particles Interact- ing with Electrons, Phys

    I. Arnquistet al.(DAMIC-M), First Constraints from DAMIC-M on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Particles Interact- ing with Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 171003 (2023), arXiv:2302.02372 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [55]

    T. K. Buiet al.(TESSERACT), First Limits on Light Dark Matter Interactions in a Low Threshold Two- Channel Athermal Phonon Detector from the TESSER- ACT Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 161002 (2025), arXiv:2503.03683 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    Angloheret al., The CRESST experiment: towards the next-generation of sub-GeV direct dark matter de- tection, (2025), arXiv:2505.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    G. Angloheret al., The CRESST experiment: towards the next-generation of sub-GeV direct dark matter de- tection, (2025), arXiv:2505.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [57]

    Alkhatibet al.(SuperCDMS), Light Dark Matter Search with a High-Resolution Athermal Phonon De- tector Operated Above Ground, Phys

    I. Alkhatibet al.(SuperCDMS), Light Dark Matter Search with a High-Resolution Athermal Phonon De- tector Operated Above Ground, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 061801 (2021), arXiv:2007.14289 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [58]

    M. M. Aroraet al.(NEWS-G), Search for Light Dark Matter with NEWS-G at the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Using a Methane Target, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 141002 (2025), arXiv:2407.12769 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [59]

    Baudiset al., First Sub-MeV Dark Matter Search with the QROCODILE Experiment Using Supercon- ducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors, Phys

    L. Baudiset al., First Sub-MeV Dark Matter Search with the QROCODILE Experiment Using Supercon- ducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 081002 (2025)

    2025

  59. [60]

    Schwemmbaueret al., First direct search for light dark matter interactions in a transition-edge sensor, (2025), arXiv:2506.18982 [physics.ins-det]

    C. Schwemmbaueret al., First direct search for light dark matter interactions in a transition-edge sensor, (2025), arXiv:2506.18982 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [61]

    J. Gao, Y. Hochberg, B. V. Lehmann, S. W. Nam, P. Szypryt, M. R. Vissers, and T. Xu, Detecting Light Dark Matter with Kinetic Inductance Detectors, (2024), arXiv:2403.19739 [hep-ph]. 19

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    SPLENDOR: a novel detector platform to search for light dark matter with narrow-gap semiconductors,

    P. Abbamonteet al., SPLENDOR: a novel detector plat- form to search for light dark matter with narrow-gap semiconductors, (2025), arXiv:2507.17782 [physics.ins- det]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    Toschiet al.(DELight), Signal partitioning in super- fluid He4: A Monte Carlo approach, Phys

    F. Toschiet al.(DELight), Signal partitioning in super- fluid He4: A Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. D111, 032013 (2025), arXiv:2410.13684 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [64]

    Cheek, P

    A. Cheek, P. Figueroa, G. Herrera, and I. M. Shoe- maker, Sub-GeV Dark Matter Under Pressure from Di- rect Detection, (2025), arXiv:2507.15956 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [65]

    P. Du, R. Essig, B. J. Rauscher, and H. Xu, Direct Con- straints on Strongly Interacting Dark Matter from the James Webb Space Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 051002 (2025), arXiv:2412.13131 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    Liang, L

    Z.-L. Liang, L. Su, L. Wu, and B. Zhu, Plasmon- enhanced Direct Detection of sub-MeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 071001 (2025), arXiv:2401.11971 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [67]

    T. N. Maity and R. Laha, Cosmic-ray boosted dark mat- ter in Xe-based direct detection experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 117 (2024), arXiv:2210.01815 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [68]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Search for Light Dark Mat- ter Interactions Enhanced by the Migdal Effect or Bremsstrahlung in XENON1T, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Search for Light Dark Mat- ter Interactions Enhanced by the Migdal Effect or Bremsstrahlung in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 241803 (2019), arXiv:1907.12771 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [69]

    First Direct Detection Limits on sub-GeV Dark Matter from XENON10

    R. Essig, A. Manalaysay, J. Mardon, P. Sorensen, and T. Volansky, First Direct Detection Limits on sub-GeV Dark Matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 021301 (2012), arXiv:1206.2644 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  69. [70]

    A. Das, J. Jang, and H. Min, Sub-MeV dark matter de- tection with bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. D110, 043020 (2024), arXiv:2312.00866 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [71]

    Wang, Graphene-based detectors for directional dark matter detection, Eur

    S.-Y. Wang, Graphene-based detectors for directional dark matter detection, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 561 (2019), arXiv:1509.08801 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [72]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, C. G. Tully, and K. M. Zurek, Directional detection of dark matter with two-dimensional targets, Phys. Lett. B772, 239 (2017), arXiv:1606.08849 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  72. [73]

    Kim, J.-C

    D. Kim, J.-C. Park, K. C. Fong, and G.-H. Lee, Graphene-based super-light invisible matter par- ticle search, Phys. Rev. D112, 015002 (2025), arXiv:2002.07821 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [74]

    Catena, T

    R. Catena, T. Emken, M. Matas, N. A. Spaldin, and E. Urdshals, Direct searches for general dark matter- electron interactions with graphene detectors: Part II. Sensitivity studies, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043258 (2023), arXiv:2303.15509 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [75]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 109–162 (2009)

    2009

  75. [76]

    J. B. Oostinga, H. B. Heersche, X. Liu, A. F. Mor- purgo, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Gate-induced insu- lating state in bilayer graphene devices, Nature Materi- als7, 151–157 (2007)

    2007

  76. [77]

    T. Ohta, A. Bostwick, T. Seyller, K. Horn, and E. Rotenberg, Controlling the electronic struc- ture of bilayer graphene, Science313, 951 (2006), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1130681

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1130681 2006

  77. [78]

    McCann, Electronic properties of monolayer and bi- layer graphene, inGraphene Nanoelectronics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011) p

    E. McCann, Electronic properties of monolayer and bi- layer graphene, inGraphene Nanoelectronics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011) p. 237–275

    2011

  78. [79]

    Charlier, X

    J.-C. Charlier, X. Gonze, and J.-P. Michenaud, Graphite interplanar bonding: Electronic delocalization and van der waals interaction, Europhysics Letters28, 403 (1994)

    1994

  79. [80]

    A. B. Kuzmenko, I. Crassee, D. van der Marel, P. Blake, and K. S. Novoselov, Determination of the gate-tunable band gap and tight-binding parameters in bilayer graphene using infrared spectroscopy, Physical Review B80, 10.1103/physrevb.80.165406 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.165406 2009

  80. [81]

    C. Boyd, Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, E. D. Kramer, N. Kurinsky, B. V. Lehmann, and T. C. Yu, Directional detection of dark matter with anisotropic response functions, Physical Review D108, 10.1103/phys- revd.108.015015 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2023

Showing first 80 references.