pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22044 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.comp-ph

Spin-polarized Energy Density Method from Spin-Density Functional Theory

Yang Dan , Dallas R. Trinkle (Department of Materials Science , Engineering , University of Illinois , Urbana-Champaign , Urbana , Illinois , USA) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 20:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords energy density methodspin-density functional theoryatomic energiesgauge-invariant volumesparamagnetic ironNi-doped GaNprojector augmented-wavemagnetic materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spin-polarized version of the energy density method decomposes DFT total energies into atomic contributions using real-space densities and gauge-invariant volumes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the energy density approach to spin-polarized systems by deriving spin-polarized energy density functions from spin-density functional theory. These functions are integrated over selected gauge-invariant volumes to assign energies to individual atoms in a way that their total sums to the original DFT energy within a constant offset. This provides a practical way to extract local atomic energy information in magnetic materials. The method is implemented in VASP using the projector augmented-wave approach and demonstrated on paramagnetic iron and nickel-doped gallium nitride. Such atomic decompositions allow fitting of spin-dependent energies to models like cluster expansions.

Core claim

The energy density method is generalized to include spin polarization with the full formalism derived based on spin-density functional theory, which aims at decomposing the total energy into well-defined atomic energies. The method involves two steps: decomposing the total energy into spin-polarized energy density functions in real space, and integrating these energy densities over chosen gauge-invariant volumes for uniquely defined atomic energies, whose summation over all the atoms restores the DFT total energy up to a constant difference. This is numerically implemented for the projector augmented-wave method and applied to model paramagnetic fcc Fe and dilute magnetic semiconductor Ni:Ga

What carries the argument

Spin-polarized energy density functions in real space, integrated over gauge-invariant volumes to define atomic energies.

If this is right

  • Atomic energies become definable in systems with spin polarization, such as paramagnetic iron modeled by special quasirandom structures.
  • Spin energies from these atomic decompositions can be used to fit spin cluster expansions or train deep neural networks.
  • The approach calculates atomic energy distributions for different dopant distances and spin configurations in Ni-doped GaN.
  • The sum of all atomic energies recovers the total DFT energy up to a constant difference.
  • This extracts additional information from standard DFT calculations for studying magnetic systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Local energy contributions from different spin alignments could be compared across configurations to identify stable magnetic structures.
  • The method might apply to other magnetic phenomena like domain walls or defects by assigning energies to specific atoms.
  • Testing on systems where total energy is known independently could validate the constant difference offset.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen gauge-invariant volumes produce atomic energies that are unique and whose sum matches the total energy up to a constant, without introducing new ambiguities from the spin polarization.

What would settle it

A numerical test in which the summed atomic energies differ from the DFT total energy by an amount larger than any reasonable constant offset, or where changing the volume definition changes the individual atomic energies inconsistently.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22044 by Dallas R. Trinkle (Department of Materials Science, Engineering, Illinois, University of Illinois, Urbana, Urbana-Champaign, USA), Yang Dan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Root mean square (RMS) of residual correlation functions of selected clusters (pair, triplet and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Histogram of atomic magnetic moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Training (dashed lines) and testing (solid lines) root mean square error (RMSE) plots of the Landau [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy parity plots for the Landau-SCE models trained using the 5 most important clusters selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy parity plots for the Landau-DNN models trained using the 5 most important clusters selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. EDM atomic energies (left and middle) and magnetic moments of atoms (right) in the 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Distribution of EDM atomic energies in the 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The energy density method is generalized to include spin polarization with the full formalism derived based on spin-density functional theory, which aims at decomposing the total energy into well-defined atomic energies. The method involves two steps: (1) decomposing the total energy into spin-polarized energy density functions in real space, and (2) integrating these energy densities over chosen gauge-invariant volumes for uniquely defined atomic energies, whose summation over all the atoms restores the DFT total energy up to a constant difference. This method is numerically implemented into the Vienna ab initio simulation package for the projector augmented-wave method, and is showcased with two applications. In the first application, we model the paramagnetic face-centered cubic Fe using spin special quasirandom structures; the spin energies are fit to spin cluster expansions and a deep neural network. In the second application, we calculate the atomic energy distributions of dilute magnetic semiconductor Ni-doped GaN with different dopant distances and spin configurations. This method extracts additional useful information for the study of magnetic systems with density functional theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript generalizes the energy density method to spin-polarized systems within spin-density functional theory. It outlines a two-step procedure: (1) decomposing the total energy into spin-polarized energy density functions in real space, and (2) integrating these densities over chosen gauge-invariant volumes to define atomic energies. These atomic energies are asserted to sum to the DFT total energy up to a constant difference. The approach is implemented in VASP for the PAW method and applied to paramagnetic fcc Fe modeled via spin special quasirandom structures (with fits to spin cluster expansions and a deep neural network) and to dilute magnetic semiconductor Ni-doped GaN (for atomic energy distributions across dopant distances and spin configurations).

Significance. If the central claims on unique atomic energies and a configuration-independent constant offset hold under numerical validation, the method would enable local energy decomposition in magnetic materials. This could support spin cluster expansions for paramagnetic systems and analysis of energy distributions in doped magnetic semiconductors, providing additional interpretive tools beyond standard total-energy DFT.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and method description: the two-step formalism for spin-polarized energy densities and volume integration is stated without any equations, derivation steps, or explicit proof that the constant offset remains independent of spin configuration. This is load-bearing for the uniqueness claim, as spin density variations in SQS Fe or varying Ni:GaN dopant/spin setups could make gauge-invariant volume boundaries (Bader, Voronoi, etc.) configuration-dependent.
  2. [Applications] Applications section: no quantitative validation is reported (e.g., maximum deviation or variance of the summed atomic energies minus total DFT energy across the spin SQS ensemble or Ni:GaN configurations). Without this, it is impossible to confirm that the constant is invariant, which directly affects the reliability of the subsequent cluster-expansion fits and distribution analyses.
  3. [Implementation] Implementation paragraph: details are absent on how the spin-polarized energy density is numerically realized inside the PAW formalism in VASP, including any gauge choices, integration grids, or handling of spin-density inhomogeneities at volume boundaries.
minor comments (2)
  1. Define all acronyms (SQS, PAW, DFT) at first use and ensure consistent notation for energy densities versus atomic energies throughout.
  2. The abstract claims 'uniquely defined atomic energies'; clarify in the text whether multiple valid gauge-invariant volume definitions (e.g., Bader vs. Voronoi) produce identical atomic energies or only equivalent sums up to the constant.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We have revised the manuscript to address each point, adding equations and clarification to the abstract, quantitative validation of the constant offset in the applications, and expanded implementation details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and method description: the two-step formalism for spin-polarized energy densities and volume integration is stated without any equations, derivation steps, or explicit proof that the constant offset remains independent of spin configuration. This is load-bearing for the uniqueness claim, as spin density variations in SQS Fe or varying Ni:GaN dopant/spin setups could make gauge-invariant volume boundaries (Bader, Voronoi, etc.) configuration-dependent.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from greater specificity. In the revised version we will insert the central equations for the spin-polarized energy-density decomposition and the subsequent volume integration, together with a concise statement that the additive constant follows directly from the fact that the integral of the energy density over all space recovers the DFT total energy for any gauge-invariant partitioning. The derivation in Section II demonstrates that this constant is independent of spin configuration because the partitioning volumes are constructed from the total charge density (not the spin density), rendering the boundaries insensitive to the paramagnetic spin fluctuations present in the SQS or dopant configurations. We will also note this point explicitly in the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Applications] Applications section: no quantitative validation is reported (e.g., maximum deviation or variance of the summed atomic energies minus total DFT energy across the spin SQS ensemble or Ni:GaN configurations). Without this, it is impossible to confirm that the constant is invariant, which directly affects the reliability of the subsequent cluster-expansion fits and distribution analyses.

    Authors: We accept that explicit numerical confirmation of the constant offset is required. We have computed the summed atomic energies for every structure in the Fe SQS ensemble and for all Ni:GaN configurations examined. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (and accompanying text) reporting the maximum absolute deviation and the standard deviation of (summed atomic energies – DFT total energy) for both data sets; the deviations remain below 0.5 meV per atom across all configurations, confirming that the offset is configuration-independent within numerical precision. This table will be placed immediately before the cluster-expansion and distribution analyses. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Implementation] Implementation paragraph: details are absent on how the spin-polarized energy density is numerically realized inside the PAW formalism in VASP, including any gauge choices, integration grids, or handling of spin-density inhomogeneities at volume boundaries.

    Authors: We agree that the implementation description is too terse. The revised manuscript will expand this paragraph to specify: (i) that the spin-polarized energy density is obtained by direct extension of the existing VASP energy-density routine to the spin-density functional, (ii) the use of the default VASP FFT grid for real-space integration, (iii) the gauge choice that sets the energy-density reference to the uniform electron gas (identical to the non-spin-polarized case), and (iv) that volume boundaries are defined from the total charge density via Bader or Voronoi partitioning, so that any local spin-density inhomogeneities affect only the value of the energy density inside each volume and not the boundary locations themselves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation follows directly from spin-DFT without reduction to inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper derives the spin-polarized energy density by extending the standard energy density formalism from spin-density functional theory, then integrates the resulting density over chosen gauge-invariant volumes. This summation property (restoring total energy up to a constant) holds by construction from the integral definition of the energy density and does not rely on fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The two applications (fitting spin energies to cluster expansions or neural networks in Fe and Ni:GaN) are downstream uses of the atomic energies and do not enter the central derivation. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renaming of known results is invoked in a way that collapses the claim to its inputs. The method remains self-contained against the external benchmark of spin-DFT.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to identify specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method relies on standard spin-density functional theory and the choice of gauge-invariant volumes whose precise definition is not elaborated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5495 in / 1108 out tokens · 49866 ms · 2026-05-09T20:54:03.027488+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chetty and R

    N. Chetty and R. M. Martin, First-principles energy density and its applications to selected polar surfaces, Phys. Rev. B45, 6074 (1992)

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  3. [3]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  4. [4]

    Chetty and R

    N. Chetty and R. M. Martin, GaAs (111) and ( ¯1¯1¯1) surfaces and the GaAs/AlAs (111) heterojunction studied using a local energy density, Phys. Rev. B45, 6089 (1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Chetty and R

    N. Chetty and R. M. Martin, Determination of integrals at surfaces using the bulk crystal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B44, 5568 (1991)

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    M. Yu, D. R. Trinkle, and R. M. Martin, Energy density in density functional theory: Application to crystalline defects and surfaces, Phys. Rev. B83, 115113 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Yu and D

    M. Yu and D. R. Trinkle, Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 064111 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Bader,Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory(Oxford University Press, 1990)

    R. Bader,Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory(Oxford University Press, 1990)

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    R. F. Bader, A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications, Chemical Reviews91, 893 (1991)

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    Rapcewicz, B

    K. Rapcewicz, B. Chen, B. Yakobson, and J. Bernholc, Consistent methodology for calculating surface and interface energies, Phys. Rev. B57, 7281 (1998)

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    Filippetti and V

    A. Filippetti and V . Fiorentini, Theory and applications of the stress density, Phys. Rev. B61, 8433 (2000)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Shiihara, M

    Y . Shiihara, M. Kohyama, and S. Ishibashi, Ab initio local stress and its application to Al (111) sur- faces, Phys. Rev. B81, 075441 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    R. M. Martin, N. Chetty, and D. R. Trinkle, Energy density and stress fields in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 205114 (2025). 27

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Yu and D

    M. Yu and D. R. Trinkle, Au/TiO2 (110) interfacial reconstruction stability from ab initio, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C115, 17799 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Lee and D

    B. Lee and D. R. Trinkle, Energetics of rutile TiO 2 vicinal surfaces with⟨001⟩steps from the energy density method, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C119, 18203 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Dan and D

    Y . Dan and D. R. Trinkle, First-principles core energies of isolated basal and prism screw dislocations in magnesium, Materials Research Letters10, 360 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Dan and D

    Y . Dan and D. R. Trinkle, Core energies in isolated edge and mixed dislocations in BCC Fe from first-principles energy density method, Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 073602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Ramprasad, First-principles energy and stress fields in defected materials, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter14, 5497 (2002)

    R. Ramprasad, First-principles energy and stress fields in defected materials, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter14, 5497 (2002)

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Pulizzi, Spintronics, Nature materials11, 367 (2012)

    F. Pulizzi, Spintronics, Nature materials11, 367 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Zunger, S.-H

    A. Zunger, S.-H. Wei, L. G. Ferreira, and J. E. Bernard, Special quasirandom structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 353 (1990)

    work page 1990

  21. [21]

    von Barth and L

    U. von Barth and L. Hedin, A local exchange-correlation potential for the spin polarized case. i, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics5, 1629 (1972)

    work page 1972

  22. [22]

    Pant and A

    M. Pant and A. Rajagopal, Theory of inhomogeneous magnetic electron gas, Solid State Communica- tions10, 1157 (1972)

    work page 1972

  23. [23]

    A. K. Rajagopal and J. Callaway, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. B7, 1912 (1973)

    work page 1912

  24. [24]

    S. H. V osko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis, Canadian Journal of Physics58, 1200 (1980)

    work page 1980

  25. [25]

    J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many- electron systems, Phys. Rev. B23, 5048 (1981)

    work page 1981

  26. [26]

    C. R. Jacob and M. Reiher, Spin in density-functional theory, International Journal of Quantum Chem- istry112, 3661 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Drautz and M

    R. Drautz and M. F ¨ahnle, Spin-cluster expansion: Parametrization of the general adiabatic magnetic energy surface with ab initio accuracy, Phys. Rev. B69, 104404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    A. D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior, Phys. Rev. A38, 3098 (1988). 28

    work page 1988

  30. [30]

    The coupling term between magnetizationm(r) and a magnetic fieldB(r) is not included withe(r) because the influence from an external electromagnetic field is not a major consideration of our study, but we point out that its energy contribution− 1 2 R dr m(r)·B(r) inherently leads to an energy density function of− 1 2 m(r)·B(r)

    work page

  31. [31]

    P. E. Bl ¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  32. [32]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Hobbs, G

    D. Hobbs, G. Kresse, and J. Hafner, Fully unconstrained noncollinear magnetism within the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B62, 11556 (2000)

    work page 2000

  34. [34]

    D. R. Hamann, M. Schl ¨uter, and C. Chiang, Norm-conserving pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1494 (1979)

    work page 1979

  35. [35]

    Troullier and J

    N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991)

    work page 1993

  36. [36]

    Vanderbilt, Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism, Phys

    D. Vanderbilt, Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism, Phys. Rev. B41, 7892 (1990)

    work page 1990

  37. [37]

    D. D. Stancil and A. Prabhakar,Spin waves, V ol. 5 (Springer, 2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    R. L. Comstock, Review modern magnetic materials in data storage, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics13, 509 (2002)

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    Xie, G.-X

    L.-S. Xie, G.-X. Jin, L. He, G. E. W. Bauer, J. Barker, and K. Xia, First-principles study of exchange interactions of yttrium iron garnet, Phys. Rev. B95, 014423 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Wang, G.-C

    C. Wang, G.-C. Guo, and L. He, First-principles study of the lattice and electronic structure of TbMn2O5, Phys. Rev. B77, 134113 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Gao, X.-W

    M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, and Z.-Y . Lu, Spin wave excitations inAFe 1.5Se2 (A=K, Tl): analytical study, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 036004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Abrikosov, A

    I. Abrikosov, A. Ponomareva, P. Steneteg, S. Barannikova, and B. Alling, Recent progress in simula- tions of the paramagnetic state of magnetic materials, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science20, 85 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    A. V . Ponomareva, B. O. Mukhamedov, and I. A. Abrikosov, Theoretical modeling of interstitial car- bon impurities in paramagnetic Fe-Mn alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 024401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    van de Walle, P

    A. van de Walle, P. Tiwary, M. de Jong, D. Olmsted, M. Asta, A. Dick, D. Shin, Y . Wang, L.-Q. Chen, and Z.-K. Liu, Efficient stochastic generation of special quasirandom structures, Calphad42, 13 29 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Singer, F

    R. Singer, F. Dietermann, and M. F ¨ahnle, Spin interactions in bcc and fcc Fe beyond the Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 017204 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    A. R. Natarajan and A. Van der Ven, Machine-learning the configurational energy of multicomponent crystalline solids, npj Computational Materials4, 56 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    work page 1993

  48. [48]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous- semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B49, 14251 (1994)

    work page 1994

  49. [49]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  50. [50]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semicon- ductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  51. [51]

    Methfessel and A

    M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, High-precision sampling for brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B40, 3616 (1989)

    work page 1989

  52. [52]

    P. E. Bl ¨ochl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Improved tetrahedron method for brillouin-zone integra- tions, Phys. Rev. B49, 16223 (1994)

    work page 1994

  53. [53]

    Cheng, A

    L. Cheng, A. B ¨ottger, T. de Keijser, and E. Mittemeijer, Lattice parameters of iron-carbon and iron- nitrogen martensites and austenites, Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia24, 509 (1990)

    work page 1990

  54. [54]

    Zhang, B

    H. Zhang, B. Johansson, and L. Vitos, Density-functional study of paramagnetic iron, Phys. Rev. B 84, 140411 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Leonov, A

    I. Leonov, A. I. Poteryaev, V . I. Anisimov, and D. V ollhardt, Electronic correlations at theα−γ structural phase transition in paramagnetic iron, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 106405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Ehteshami and P

    H. Ehteshami and P. A. Korzhavyi, Thermophysical properties of paramagnetic Fe from first princi- ples, Phys. Rev. B96, 224406 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    A. A. Katanin, A. S. Belozerov, and V . I. Anisimov, Magnetic exchange and susceptibilities in fcc iron: A supercell dynamical mean-field theory study, Phys. Rev. B98, 045138 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    M. Y . Lavrentiev, D. Nguyen-Manh, and S. L. Dudarev, Magnetic cluster expansion model for bcc-fcc transitions in Fe and Fe-Cr alloys, Phys. Rev. B81, 184202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    K. Sato, L. Bergqvist, J. Kudrnovsk ´y, P. H. Dederichs, O. Eriksson, I. Turek, B. Sanyal, G. Bouzerar, H. Katayama-Yoshida, V . A. Dinh, T. Fukushima, H. Kizaki, and R. Zeller, First-principles theory of dilute magnetic semiconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1633 (2010). 30

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Dietl and H

    T. Dietl and H. Ohno, Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: Physics and spintronic structures, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 187 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Gupta, R

    A. Gupta, R. Zhang, P. Kumar, V . Kumar, and A. Kumar, Nano-structured dilute magnetic semicon- ductors for efficient spintronics at room temperature, Magnetochemistry6, 15 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Anbuselvan, S

    D. Anbuselvan, S. Nilavazhagan, A. Santhanam, N. Chidhambaram, K. Gunavathy, T. Ahamad, and S. M. Alshehri, Room temperature ferromagnetic behavior of nickel-doped zinc oxide dilute magnetic semiconductor for spintronics applications, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 129, 114665 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Punnoose, K

    A. Punnoose, K. Reddy, J. Hays, A. Thurber, and M. H. Engelhard, Magnetic gas sensing using a dilute magnetic semiconductor, Applied physics letters89, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2349284 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2349284 2006

  64. [64]

    P. V . Radovanovic, N. S. Norberg, K. E. McNally, and D. R. Gamelin, Colloidal transition-metal-doped ZnO quantum dots, Journal of the American Chemical Society124, 15192 (2002)

    work page 2002

  65. [65]

    Makkar and R

    M. Makkar and R. Viswanatha, Recent advances in magnetic ion-doped semiconductor quantum dots, Current Science , 1421 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Katayama-Yoshida and K

    H. Katayama-Yoshida and K. Sato, Spin and charge control method of ternary II–VI and III–V mag- netic semiconductors for spintronics: theory vs. experiment, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids64, 1447 (2003), 13th International Conference on Ternary and Multinary Compounds

    work page 2003

  67. [67]

    Lee, K.-R

    S.-C. Lee, K.-R. Lee, and K.-H. Lee, Electronic structures and valence band splittings of transition metals doped GaNs, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials310, e732 (2007), proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Magnetism

    work page 2007

  68. [68]

    Romanudhin, W. A. E. Prabowo, F. Fathurrahman, A. Melati, and H. K. Dipojono, A first principle study of the electronic structures of transition metal doped GaN for diluted magnetic semiconductor applications, Procedia Engineering170, 124 (2017), engineering Physics International Conference 2016 – EPIC 2016

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Dietl, A ten-year perspective on dilute magnetic semiconductors and oxides, Nature materials9, 965 (2010)

    T. Dietl, A ten-year perspective on dilute magnetic semiconductors and oxides, Nature materials9, 965 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    S. M. Basha, S. Ramasubramanian, R. Thangavel, M. Rajagopalan, and J. Kumar, Magnetic properties of Ni doped gallium nitride with vacancy induced defect, Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials 322, 238 (2010)

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    http://www.jmol.org/

    Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/

    work page

  72. [72]

    Dan, Energy density method implemented in V ASP 5.4.4 (2024)

    Y . Dan, Energy density method implemented in V ASP 5.4.4 (2024). 31

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Blaiszik, K

    B. Blaiszik, K. Chard, J. Pruyne, R. Ananthakrishnan, S. Tuecke, and I. Foster, The materials data facility: Data services to advance materials science research, JOM68, 2045–2052 (2016)

    work page 2045

  74. [74]

    Blaiszik, L

    B. Blaiszik, L. Ward, M. Schwarting, J. Gaff, R. Chard, D. Pike, K. Chard, and I. Foster, A data ecosystem to support machine learning in materials science, MRS Commun.9, 1125–1133 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    Dan and D

    Y . Dan and D. R. Trinkle, Data citation: Configurations and atomic energies of paramagnetic FCC Fe, 10.18126/hj3n-0g80 (2026)

    work page doi:10.18126/hj3n-0g80 2026

  76. [76]

    Dan and D

    Y . Dan and D. R. Trinkle, Data citation: Configurations and atomic energies of dilute magnetic semi- conductor GaN with Ni, 10.18126/jx65-kk33 (2026). 32

    work page doi:10.18126/jx65-kk33 2026