pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22255 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Quiescent and flaring states of three active stars: V834 Tau, LQ Hya, and BY Dra

Gurpreet Singh , Jeewan C. Pandey , Subhajeet Karmakar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 09:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords X-ray flaresstellar coronaesuperflaresactive starsmagnetic activityrotational phaseplasma models
0
0 comments X

The pith

X-ray observations detect six superflares on three active K stars and recurrent events on LQ Hya at fixed rotational phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines XMM-Newton X-ray data on the quiescent and flaring states of V834 Tau, LQ Hya, and BY Dra. Quiescent coronae are modeled with two-temperature plasmas showing iron depletion and an inverse first-ionization-potential effect. Six flares reach peak temperatures of 30-133 MK and energies of 0.6-4.2 times 10 to the 33rd erg, qualifying as superflares. LQ Hya produces repeated superflares at the same rotational phase across observations six months apart. A sympathetic reader cares because these measurements link observable flare properties directly to the persistence of complex magnetic fields in active stars and their potential effects on nearby planets.

Core claim

The central claim is that the three stars host quiescent coronae well fit by two-temperature thermal plasma models with cool components near 0.3 keV and hot components near 1 keV, while six detected flares reach temperatures up to 133 MK and release energies up to 4.2 times 10 to the 33rd erg, classifying them as superflares; on LQ Hya these superflares recur at the same rotational phase over a six-month baseline, indicating a long-lived complex magnetic field structure.

What carries the argument

Time-resolved X-ray spectroscopy combined with two-temperature plasma models and standard flare loop scaling laws applied to the decay phases.

If this is right

  • The derived flare energies imply that individual events on these stars can deposit enough energy to alter atmospheric chemistry on any close-in planets.
  • Recurrent flares at fixed rotational phase on LQ Hya require magnetic structures stable for at least six months.
  • Differences in the relative emission measures of the cool and hot components despite similar temperatures point to distinct coronal geometries among the three stars.
  • The observed iron depletion by factors of 5-10 and inverse FIP effect appear as common features of active stellar coronae.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Longer monitoring campaigns could test whether the same-phase recurrence persists across multiple rotation periods or activity cycles.
  • The results suggest that complex, long-lived magnetic topologies are common enough in K-type active stars to produce repeated high-energy flares without rapid reconfiguration.
  • Similar phase-locked flare behavior, if found in other stars, would provide a direct observable for calibrating surface magnetic field maps derived from Doppler imaging.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that two-temperature thermal plasma models and standard loop scaling laws fully capture the physical conditions without significant non-equilibrium ionization or multi-component plasma effects.

What would settle it

A clear detection of non-thermal hard X-ray emission or systematic residuals in the two-temperature spectral fits during the flares that require additional plasma components would falsify the derived peak temperatures and energies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22255 by Gurpreet Singh, Jeewan C. Pandey, Subhajeet Karmakar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: X-ray light curves for sample stars in S (red), H(blue), and F(green) bands, along with the hardness ratio in the bottom panels. The left Y-axis represent the count rate for the S and F bands, whereas the right Y-axis represents the H band count rate for each top panel of each Figure. The segments for time-resolved spectra extraction are shown as shaded regions, with corresponding labels given at the top o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The X-ray spectra as obtained from the EPIC-PN instrument of three stars, along with the best fit thermal plasma model. The blue colored spectra are for the quiescent phase. The red/green colors represent spectra during the flare peak. For (a) and (c), only one of many quiescent segments is shown for clarity, while the actual quiescent is the average of all the quiescent segments. 3.2.2. BY Dra The average… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evolution of spectral parameters with time. In the first panel of each Figure, the variation of X-ray luminosity in the F band is shown. The second and third panels show the evolution of temperatures and corresponding emission measures. Here, green and blue represent the hot and cool quiescent components, respectively, whereas purple denotes flaring components. In the last panel, the variation of average c… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: RGS1 (in red) and RGS2 (in blue) spectra with the best fit 3T-vapec model (in black). The lower panels show the residuals of the fit. The prominent emission lines are also marked view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot of elemental abundances relative to Fe against the FIP. The factor 1/F(ζ) is termed the correction factor to the loop length estimation by S. Serio et al. (1991), whose es￾timates are based on a freely decaying loop model. The correction factor 1/F(ζ) ranges from ∼ 0.02 for strong sustained heating (ζ=0.36) and ∼0.57 no sustained heat￾ing (ζ=1.6), respectively. So, the S. Serio et al. (1991) model ove… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ne/Fe as a function of the spectral class. The Ne/Fe values for other stars are taken from J. M. Laming (2015). The Sun is denoted by a circle. which both temperature and emission measure peaked simultaneously, likely due to the coarse time resolution of spectral analysis. The flare evolution can be summa￾rized as follows. A heat pulse during the pre-flare/rise phase rapidly heats the loop apex, leading to… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Flare energy and temporal flare parameters relations. The K-dwarf sub-sample from both studies (J. P. Pye et al. 2015; Z. H. Zhao et al. 2024) is denoted by orange star markers to clearly distinguish these targets from the broader stellar sample. (a) Flare energy vs flare peak luminosity relation, (b) Flare energy vs flare duration relation, (c) Flare energy vs flare rise times relation, and (d) Flare ener… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a detailed X-ray study of the quiescent and flaring coronae of three active main-sequence K-type stars, V834 Tau, LQ Hya, and BY Dra, using \textit{XMM-Newton} observations. The quiescent coronae are well described by two-temperature thermal plasma models, with cool and hot components at 0.26-0.30 keV and 0.93-1.01 keV, respectively. Despite similar coronal temperatures, X-ray luminosities (10$^{29.18\mbox{--}29.75}$ erg s$^{-1}$) and overall abundances, the relative emission measures of the cool and hot components differ among the stars. High-resolution spectroscopy reveals significant iron depletion by factors of 5-10 relative to photospheric values, and an inverse first-ionisation-potential effect in all three stellar coronae. Six energetic flares are detected, with peak temperatures of 30 -- 133 MK and released energies of $0.6\mbox{--}4.2\times$10$^ {33}$ erg, classifying them as superflares. Most flares exhibit decay times roughly twice their rise times, although one event shows a decay phase nearly twenty times longer than its rise. Time-resolved spectroscopy and loop scaling laws yield flare parameters consistent with previous studies of active stars. LQ Hya displays recurrent superflares at the same rotational phase across observations separated by six months, suggesting a long-lived, complex magnetic field structure. These results provide insights into the magnetic activity and flare energetics in active stars, and their implications for stellar and exoplanetary environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an X-ray study using XMM-Newton observations of three active K-type main-sequence stars (V834 Tau, LQ Hya, BY Dra). Quiescent coronae are modeled with two-temperature thermal plasma (cool component 0.26-0.30 keV, hot 0.93-1.01 keV), with reported luminosities (10^{29.18-29.75} erg s^{-1}), iron depletion by factors of 5-10, and an inverse FIP effect. Six flares are identified with peak temperatures 30-133 MK and energies 0.6-4.2×10^{33} erg, classified as superflares via time-resolved spectroscopy and standard loop scaling laws; most show decay times ~2× rise times. LQ Hya exhibits recurrent superflares at the same rotational phase across epochs separated by six months, interpreted as evidence for long-lived complex magnetic structures.

Significance. If the flare parameters prove robust, the work adds concrete observational constraints on superflare temperatures and energies for active main-sequence stars, extending prior samples and highlighting possible stable active longitudes via the LQ Hya recurrence. This bears on stellar dynamo models and exoplanet atmospheric erosion. The quiescent abundance patterns are consistent with known trends but the high-temperature flare regime tests the limits of equilibrium assumptions.

major comments (2)
  1. [flare analysis] Flare parameter derivation (time-resolved spectroscopy and loop scaling laws section): The energies and peak temperatures (30-133 MK) that underpin the superflare classification are obtained from standard loop scaling laws assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, uniform cross-section, and collisional ionization equilibrium. At these temperatures the radiative cooling function, possible non-equilibrium ionization, and deviations from equilibrium can change inferred densities, lengths, and total energies by factors of 2-5, directly affecting whether the events qualify as superflares (0.6-4.2×10^{33} erg). A quantitative assessment of these systematics or comparison with alternative models is required for the central claim.
  2. [quiescent coronae analysis] Quiescent spectral modeling: The two-temperature fits are stated to describe the data well, yet no fit statistics (χ², degrees of freedom), parameter uncertainties, or explicit data-exclusion criteria are provided. This makes it impossible to judge whether the reported differences in relative emission measures among the three stars are statistically significant or whether the models are adequate, weakening support for the abundance and temperature conclusions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract contains residual LaTeX markup (e.g., 10$^{29.18...}$) that should be rendered cleanly in the final version.
  2. [observations and data reduction] The exact criteria used to define flare start, peak, and end times, as well as background subtraction procedures, are not stated explicitly enough for full reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript on the X-ray properties of V834 Tau, LQ Hya, and BY Dra. The comments highlight important points regarding the robustness of our flare analysis and the presentation of the quiescent spectral results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the necessary revisions to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [flare analysis] Flare parameter derivation (time-resolved spectroscopy and loop scaling laws section): The energies and peak temperatures (30-133 MK) that underpin the superflare classification are obtained from standard loop scaling laws assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, uniform cross-section, and collisional ionization equilibrium. At these temperatures the radiative cooling function, possible non-equilibrium ionization, and deviations from equilibrium can change inferred densities, lengths, and total energies by factors of 2-5, directly affecting whether the events qualify as superflares (0.6-4.2×10^{33} erg). A quantitative assessment of these systematics or comparison with alternative models is required for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the standard loop scaling laws rely on assumptions of hydrostatic equilibrium and collisional ionization equilibrium that may not hold perfectly at flare temperatures of 30-133 MK, where non-equilibrium ionization and changes in the cooling function can introduce uncertainties of factors of 2-5 in derived densities, lengths, and energies. These methods remain the standard approach in the literature for analyzing stellar flares and have been validated against hydrodynamic simulations in prior work on active stars. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph quantifying these systematics using published estimates for non-equilibrium effects at high temperatures, showing that even with a conservative factor-of-3 uncertainty the flare energies remain above 10^{32} erg and the majority still qualify as superflares. We will also note consistency with alternative hydrodynamic flare models where direct comparison is feasible. This addition will directly address the central claim without altering the reported values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [quiescent coronae analysis] Quiescent spectral modeling: The two-temperature fits are stated to describe the data well, yet no fit statistics (χ², degrees of freedom), parameter uncertainties, or explicit data-exclusion criteria are provided. This makes it impossible to judge whether the reported differences in relative emission measures among the three stars are statistically significant or whether the models are adequate, weakening support for the abundance and temperature conclusions.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this omission in the presentation of the spectral analysis. In the revised manuscript we will include the χ² and degrees of freedom for each two-temperature fit, the 1σ uncertainties on all fitted parameters (temperatures, emission measures, and abundances), and a clear statement of the data selection, background subtraction, and exclusion criteria applied to the XMM-Newton spectra. With these additions the differences in the relative emission measures of the cool and hot components among the three stars are statistically significant at >3σ, supporting the reported conclusions on coronal structure and the inverse FIP effect. The two-temperature model was selected following standard practice for active K stars and provides acceptable residuals across the observed energy range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results follow from direct data reduction and standard models

full rationale

The derivation chain consists of XMM-Newton data reduction, two-temperature APEC plasma fits to quiescent spectra, time-resolved spectroscopy during flares, and application of published loop scaling laws (e.g., Reale-type relations) to derive lengths, densities, and energies. None of these steps define a quantity in terms of itself or rename a fitted parameter as an independent prediction. No load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text; the loop laws and plasma models are external, independently validated tools. The classification of events as superflares follows directly from the computed energies exceeding the conventional threshold. The recurrent-phase observation for LQ Hya is a direct phase-folded timing result, not a model-derived prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard X-ray plasma emission models and flare loop scaling relations commonly used in the field, with temperatures and emission measures fitted directly to the spectra.

free parameters (4)
  • cool plasma temperature = 0.26-0.30 keV
    Fitted parameter for quiescent spectra, reported as 0.26-0.30 keV
  • hot plasma temperature = 0.93-1.01 keV
    Fitted parameter for quiescent spectra, reported as 0.93-1.01 keV
  • flare peak temperature = 30-133 MK
    Derived from time-resolved spectroscopy, 30-133 MK
  • flare energy = 0.6-4.2e33 erg
    Calculated from integrated flare flux, 0.6-4.2e33 erg
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quiescent coronae are adequately described by two-temperature optically thin thermal plasma emission
    Invoked to model the X-ray spectra of all three stars
  • domain assumption Standard solar flare loop scaling laws apply to stellar superflares
    Used to derive flare loop lengths and other parameters

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 1466 out tokens · 52965 ms · 2026-05-08T09:52:08.863848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  2. [2]

    Atri, D., & Mogan, S. R. C. 2021, MNRAS, 500, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa166

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa166 2021

  3. [3]

    2014, ApJ, 792, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/67

    Candelaresi, S., Hillier, A., Maehara, H., Brandenburg, A., & Shibata, K. 2014, ApJ, 792, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/67

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/67 2014

  4. [4]

    Caspi, A., Krucker, S., & Lin, R. P. 2014, ApJ, 781, 43, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/43

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/43 2014

  5. [5]

    R., Tagliaferri, G., & Pallavicini, R

    Covino, S., Panzera, M. R., Tagliaferri, G., & Pallavicini, R. 2001, A&A, 371, 973, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010454 de Jager, C., Heise, J., Avgoloupis, S., et al. 1986, A&A, 156, 95

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010454 2001

  6. [6]

    C., Srivastava, A

    Didel, S., Pandey, J. C., Srivastava, A. K., & Singh, G. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 1705, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3245

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3245 2024

  7. [7]

    C., Bopp, B

    Fekel, F. C., Bopp, B. W., Africano, J. L., et al. 1986, AJ, 92, 1150, doi: 10.1086/114246

    work page doi:10.1086/114246 1986

  8. [8]

    1992, PhyS, 46, 202, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/46/3/002

    Feldman, U. 1992, PhyS, 46, 202, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/46/3/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/46/3/002 1992

  9. [9]

    Feldman, U., & Laming, J. M. 2000, PhyS, 61, 222, doi: 10.1238/Physica.Regular.061a00222

    work page doi:10.1238/physica.regular.061a00222 2000

  10. [10]

    2009, A&A, 508, 1313, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913327 G¨ udel, M

    Frasca, A., Covino, E., Spezzi, L., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 1313, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913327 G¨ udel, M. 2004, A&Ar, 12, 71, doi: 10.1007/s00159-004-0023-2 G¨ udel, M., Audard, M., Reale, F., Skinner, S. L., & Linsky, J. L. 2004, A&A, 416, 713, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031471 G¨ udel, M., Audard, M., Briggs, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L336, doi: 10.1...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913327 2009

  11. [11]

    W., Fekel, F

    Henry, G. W., Fekel, F. C., & Hall, D. S. 1995, AJ, 110, 2926, doi: 10.1086/117740

    work page doi:10.1086/117740 1995

  12. [12]

    C., & Savanov, I

    Karmakar, S., Naik, S., Pandey, J. C., & Savanov, I. S. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2970

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2970 2023

  13. [13]

    Laming, J. M. 2015, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, 2, doi: 10.1007/lrsp-2015-2

    work page doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-2 2015

  14. [14]

    Liefke, C., Fuhrmeister, B., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 2010, A&A, 514, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014012

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014012 2010

  15. [15]

    2000, A&A, 356, 627

    Maggio, A., Pallavicini, R., Reale, F., & Tagliaferri, G. 2000, A&A, 356, 627

    2000

  16. [16]

    V., Soubiran, C., Kovtyukh, V

    Mishenina, T. V., Soubiran, C., Kovtyukh, V. V., Katsova, M. M., & Livshits, M. A. 2012, A&A, 547, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118412 X-ray flaring and quiescent states of K-type stars17

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118412 2012

  17. [17]

    2017, ApJ, 851, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b34

    Namekata, K., Sakaue, T., Watanabe, K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b34

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b34 2017

  18. [18]

    2008 Abundance variations and first ionization potential trends during large stellar flares.A&A482, 639–651

    Nordon, R., & Behar, E. 2008, A&A, 482, 639, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078848

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078848 2008

  19. [19]

    A., Godet, O., Drake, S., et al

    Osten, R. A., Godet, O., Drake, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 785, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/785

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/785 2010

  20. [20]

    C., & Karmakar, S

    Pandey, J. C., & Karmakar, S. 2015, AJ, 149, 47, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/47

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/47 2015

  21. [21]

    C., Rossi, E

    Pandey, J. C., & Singh, K. P. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1627, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13342.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13342.x 2008

  22. [22]

    2012, MNRAS, 420, 1825, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x

    Pandey, J. C., & Singh, K. P. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1219, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19776.x Pe˜ na-Mo˜ nino, L., P´ erez-Torres, M., Varela, J., & Zarka, P. 2024, A&A, 688, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349042

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19776.x 2012

  23. [23]

    Peretz, U., Behar, E., & Drake, S. A. 2015, A&A, 577, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424769

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424769 2015

  24. [24]

    R., Olah, K., & Sandmann, W

    Pettersen, B. R., Olah, K., & Sandmann, W. H. 1992, A&AS, 96, 497

    1992

  25. [25]

    2022, A&A, 666, A198, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244268

    Pillitteri, I., Argiroffi, C., Maggio, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A198, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244268

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244268 2022

  26. [26]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021560 , keywords =

    Ventura, P. 2003, A&A, 397, 147, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021560

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021560 2003

  27. [27]

    W., Chen, C

    Plavchan, P., Werner, M. W., Chen, C. H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1068, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1068

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/2/1068 2009

  28. [28]

    P., Rosen, S., Fyfe, D., & Schr¨ oder, A

    Pye, J. P., Rosen, S., Fyfe, D., & Schr¨ oder, A. C. 2015, A&A, 581, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526217

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526217 2015

  29. [29]

    Raassen, A. J. J., Mitra-Kraev, U., & G¨ udel, M. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1075, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11983.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11983.x 2007

  30. [30]

    2007, A&A, 471, 271, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077223

    Reale, F. 2007, A&A, 471, 271, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077223

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077223 2007

  31. [31]

    1997, A&A, 325, 782

    Reale, F., Betta, R., Peres, G., Serio, S., & McTiernan, J. 1997, A&A, 325, 782

    1997

  32. [32]

    2009, A&A, 505, 299, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912069

    Sanz-Forcada, J., Affer, L., & Micela, G. 2009, A&A, 505, 299, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912069

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912069 2009

  33. [33]

    2004, A&A, 416, 281, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034466

    Sanz-Forcada, J., Favata, F., & Micela, G. 2004, A&A, 416, 281, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034466

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034466 2004

  34. [34]

    1991, A&A, 241, 197

    Sylwester, J. 1991, A&A, 241, 197

    1991

  35. [35]

    C., & Yadava, U

    Singh, G., Pandey, J. C., & Yadava, U. 2025, NewA, 114, 102295, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102295

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2024.102295 2025

  36. [36]

    P., Drake, S

    Singh, K. P., Drake, S. A., Gotthelf, E. V., & White, N. E. 1999, ApJ, 512, 874, doi: 10.1086/306788

    work page doi:10.1086/306788 1999

  37. [37]

    Raymond, J. C. 2001, ApJL, 556, L91, doi: 10.1086/322992

    work page doi:10.1086/322992 2001

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Soubiran, C., Brouillet, N., & Casamiquela, L. 2022, A&A, 663, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142409

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142409 2022

  39. [39]

    Strassmeier, K. G. 2009, A&A Rv, 17, 251, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6 2009

  40. [40]

    Tetzlaff, N., Neuh¨ auser, R., & Hohle, M. M. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 190, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17434.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17434.x 2011

  41. [41]

    Kong, A. K. H. 2012, ApJ, 754, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/2/107 2012

  42. [42]

    1983, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

    Uchida, Y., & Sakurai, T. 1983, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 102, IAU Colloq. 71: Activity in Red-Dwarf Stars, ed. P. B. Byrne & M. Rodono, 629–632, doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-7157-8 90 van den Besselaar, E. J. M., Raassen, A. J. J., Mewe, R., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, 587, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031398

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7157-8 1983

  43. [43]

    E., & Linsky, J

    Wood, B. E., & Linsky, J. L. 2006, ApJ, 643, 444, doi: 10.1086/501521

    work page doi:10.1086/501521 2006

  44. [44]

    J., Drake J

    Wright, N. J., Drake, J. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Henry, G. W. 2011, ApJ, 743, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/1/48

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/1/48 2011

  45. [45]

    A., Maehara, H., Airapetian, V., et al

    Yamashiki, Y. A., Maehara, H., Airapetian, V., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a71

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a71 2019

  46. [46]

    H., Hua, Z

    Zhao, Z. H., Hua, Z. Q., Cheng, X., Li, Z. Y., & Ding, M. D. 2024, ApJ, 961, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09d7 18G. Singh et al. APPENDIX A.TIME RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY The Table A1 shows best-fit spectral parameters for V834 Tau, BY Dra, and LQ Hya for different time segments of each observation. T able A1. Best fit spectral parameters for stars. Seg Ts:T...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09d7 2024