pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22680 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ph· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Dense Matter and Compact Stars in Strong Magnetic Fields

Monika Sinha , Vivek Baruah Thapa
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-phnucl-th
keywords dense mattermagnetarsneutron starsLandau quantizationrelativistic mean fieldequation of statehyperonsanomalous magnetic moment
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong magnetic fields of 10^17 to 10^18 G inside magnetars change the microscopic properties of dense matter and the resulting neutron-star structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review paper examines how extremely intense magnetic fields expected in magnetars affect the behavior of matter at densities far beyond laboratory reach. It focuses on two main mechanisms: the quantization of charged particle energy levels into discrete Landau states and the additional energy shifts from particle magnetic moments. These changes are incorporated into relativistic mean-field models of hadronic matter that also allow for hyperons, Delta resonances, meson condensates, and possible quark matter. The resulting modifications to the pressure-density relation then influence the overall size, mass, and stability of compact stars, which can be compared with astronomical observations.

Core claim

The authors review that magnetic fields of order 10^17-10^18 G alter fermionic matter through Landau quantization and anomalous magnetic moment interactions. Within relativistic mean-field approaches they discuss the behavior of magnetized hadronic matter and the possible appearance of additional degrees of freedom including hyperons, Delta resonances, meson condensates and quark matter, together with the consequences for neutron-star structure and observational constraints.

What carries the argument

Landau quantization of charged particle orbits together with anomalous magnetic moment couplings inside relativistic mean-field models of dense hadronic matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the magnetic modifications are confirmed, magnetar observations could provide tighter constraints on the high-density equation of state than non-magnetized models alone.
  • Including finite temperature or general-relativistic corrections in the same framework would allow direct predictions for magnetar cooling curves and gravitational-wave signals.
  • The same quantization effects might be tested indirectly in laboratory heavy-ion collisions that produce transient strong magnetic fields.

Load-bearing premise

Magnetars contain interior magnetic fields as strong as 10^17-10^18 G and the relativistic mean-field description of matter remains valid under those conditions.

What would settle it

A precise measurement showing that any magnetar has an interior field strength well below 10^17 G, or a mass-radius relation for a neutron star that cannot be reproduced by any equation of state modified by these magnetic effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22680 by Monika Sinha, Vivek Baruah Thapa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: P˘P˙ diagram of the observed pulsar population. Dashed curves indicate lines of constant characteristic age and surface magnetic field. Binary pulsars, RAdio Transients (RRATs), and magne￾tars are shown as circles, stars, and upward triangles, respectively. The lower shaded region marks the “pulsar graveyard,” where radio emission is expected to cease, while the upper shaded area corresponds to surface mag… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Model HS81: variation of binding energy per nucleon of nucleonic matter with model HS81 with the normalized baryonic density for different magnetic fields. The curve a is without magnetic field while the curves b, c and d are for B = 104B (e) c , B (p) c and 10B (p) c respectively. The pressure as a function of energy density is shown in the inset. The result has been taken from [74]. n (p) max ∑ n=0 p (p)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Model GM3: variation of m∗/m for nucleonic matter with the normalized baryonic density for different field strength. Dotted curve is for B = 0, solid line for B = 105B (e) c , dashed line for B = 3.3 × 106B (e) c . Inset: the variation of m∗/m with field strength for different baryon density. The dotted curve is for nB/n0 = 0.5, solid line for nB/n0 = 1, long dashed curve for nB/n0 = 2, short dashed for nB… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Model HS81: variation of proton fraction with the normalized baryonic density for different magnetic fields. The solid curve is for B = 0, the dashed curve for B = 104B (e) c , the dotted curve for B = B (p) c and the dot-dashed curve for B = 10B (p) c respectively. The result has been taken from [74] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model GM3: variation of proton fraction in nucleonic matter with the field strength for different baryonic density Left panel: Proton fraction without AMM, right panel: with AMM. The dotted curve is for nB/n0 = 0.5, the solid line for nB/n0 = 1, the long dashed curve for nB/n0 = 2 and the short-dashed curve for nB/n0 = 4. The result has been taken from [50]. One important feature of the NS observation is i… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Model GM3: variation of pressure for nucleonic matter with the normalized baryonic density for different field strength. Inset: the variation of pressure with energy density baryon density. Dotted curve is for B = 0, solid line for B = 105B (e) c , dashed line for B = 3.3 × 106B (e) c . Left panel: EoS wihout AMM, right panel: with AMM. The result has been taken from [50]. if the process is operative. Insi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dependence of the total pressure on the baryon number density normalized to saturation density. Left panel: Results are shown for two representative central magnetic field strengths, Bc = 0 and Bc = 1018 G, using different magnetic field profiles. The profiles correspond to parameter sets β = 10−3 , γ = 6 (dashed lines), β = 10−1 , γ = 4 (double-dashed lines), and the limiting case β → ∞, representing a co… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Magnetic field as a function of the normalized density n/n0 for the profile given by Eq. (42). The upper curves correspond to µ = 1.5 × 1032A − m2 and the lower curves to µ = 2 × 1031A − m2 . Solid and dotted lines indicate the DD-ME2 and DD-MEX parametrizations, respectively. Figure adapted from [88]. where Bs and Bc are surface and central field strength respectively and β, γ are two parameters as propos… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Variation of δYi = ni (B)/ni (0) with normalized baryon density n/n0 for baryon octet and ∆-baryons. The right panel indicates the particle markers. Upper and lower panels represent exponential and universal magnetic-field profiles, respectively. Figure adapted from [93]. charged pions (π −) are the most frequently discussed candidates. While both may con￾dense once their in-medium excitation energy equals… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Variation of δYi = ni (B)/ni (0) as a function of the total baryon density normalized to saturation density, for a stellar dipole moment µ = 2 × 1031A − m2 (upper panel) and µ = 1.5 × 1032A − m2 (lower panel), respectively. Figure adapted from [88]. 5. Quark Matter At high baryon densities, the interior of NSs may experience a transition from hadronic matter to a deconfined quark phase. In this context, i… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Radial mass distribution of hadronic and dark matter components in magnetized dark matter–admixed NSs, illustrating core, mixed, and halo configurations. Figure adapted from Ref.-[38]. 6.2. Magnetic Deformation and Non-Symmetric Dark Matter Halos The interplay between ultra-strong magnetic fields and DM-admixed NSs introduces qualitatively new effects. In magnetars, where central magnetic fields may reach… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Mass–radius relation for magnetized dark matter–admixed NSs for different dark matter fractions. The polar and equatorial radii illustrate magnetic deformation, while observational con￾straints from NICER and GW170817 are shown for comparison. Figure adapted from Ref.-[38]. 6.3. Impact on Structure and Observational Signatures The presence of a DM component in magnetized NSs modifies both their equilibriu… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Compact stars serve as natural systems where matter exists at densities far beyond those achievable in laboratory experiments. Among them, magnetars are expected to possess interior magnetic fields that may reach values of the order of $10^{17}-10^{18}$ G. These extreme conditions are expected to alter the microscopic and macroscopic properties of dense matter. In this review, we examine how strong magnetic fields affect fermionic matter through mechanisms such as Landau quantization and anomalous magnetic moment interactions. We further discuss the behaviour of magnetized hadronic matter within relativistic mean-field approaches and consider the possible emergence of additional degrees of freedom, including hyperons, $\Delta$ resonances, meson condensates and quark matter. The consequences of these effects for neutron-star structure and observational constraints are also briefly outlined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review summarizes how strong magnetic fields of order 10^{17}-10^{18} G, hypothesized for magnetar interiors, modify the properties of dense fermionic matter through Landau quantization and anomalous magnetic moment interactions. It covers relativistic mean-field treatments of magnetized hadronic matter, the incorporation of additional degrees of freedom (hyperons, Δ resonances, meson condensates, quark matter), and the resulting changes to the equation of state, neutron-star structure, and observational constraints.

Significance. If the summarized literature effects are accurately represented, the review provides a useful consolidation of established results on magnetized dense matter for the compact-star community. It connects microscopic mechanisms to macroscopic stellar properties and observational implications, serving as a reference point for researchers modeling magnetars or constraining the dense-matter equation of state under extreme conditions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that fields 'may reach' 10^{17}-10^{18} G would benefit from a brief parenthetical reference to the specific magnetar models or indirect constraints that motivate this range.
  2. The review should ensure that every summarized result (e.g., specific shifts in the EOS or maximum mass) is explicitly tied to the original RMF calculation it draws from, to maintain clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, recognition of its utility as a consolidation of results on magnetized dense matter, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised that require specific responses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no original derivations or load-bearing self-references

full rationale

This is a review summarizing established effects of strong magnetic fields on dense matter via Landau quantization, anomalous magnetic moments, and relativistic mean-field models, without presenting new equations, fits, or predictions. No derivation chain exists that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction, and references to prior work are not self-citations that bear the central claim. The analysis remains conditional on external literature and hypotheses about magnetar fields.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central statements rest on the validity of relativistic mean-field theory for magnetized hadronic matter and on the existence of interior fields at the quoted strengths; these are standard domain assumptions rather than new postulates of this paper.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Relativistic mean-field models remain applicable at densities several times nuclear saturation and in magnetic fields up to 10^18 G.
    Invoked when discussing magnetized hadronic matter and additional degrees of freedom.
  • domain assumption Interior magnetic fields in magnetars reach 10^17-10^18 G.
    Stated in the abstract as the motivating condition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5425 in / 1281 out tokens · 58973 ms · 2026-05-08T10:02:37.160370+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Discovery of an Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar in the Supernova Remnant Kes 73.Astro

    Vasisht, G.; Gotthelf, E.V . The Discovery of an Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar in the Supernova Remnant Kes 73.Astro. Phys. J.1997,486, L129, [astro-ph/9706058]. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 310843

    work page arXiv 1997

  2. [2]

    1998, Nature, 393, 235, doi: 10.1038/30410

    Kouveliotou, C.; Dieters, S.; Strohmayer, T.; van Paradijs, J.; Fishman, G.J.; Meegan, C.A.; Hurley, K.; Kommers, J.; Smith, I.; Frail, D.; et al. An X-ray pulsar with a superstrong magnetic field in the soft γ-ray repeater SGR1806 - 20.Nature1998,393, 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1038/30410

    work page doi:10.1038/30410

  3. [3]

    Discovery of a New Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR 1627-41.Astro

    Woods, P .M.; Kouveliotou, C.; van Paradijs, J.; Hurley, K.; Kippen, R.M.; Finger, M.H.; Briggs, M.S.; Dieters, S.; Fishman, G.J. Discovery of a New Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR 1627-41.Astro. Phys. J.1999,519, L139–L142, [astro-ph/9903267]. https://doi.org/10.1086/312124

    work page doi:10.1086/312124 1999

  4. [4]

    C., & Thompson, C

    Duncan, R.C.; Thompson, C. Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars - Implications for gamma-ray bursts.Astro. Phys. J.1992,392, L9–L13. https://doi.org/10.1086/186413

    work page doi:10.1086/186413 1992

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Usov, V .V . Millisecond pulsars with extremely strong magnetic fields as a cosmological source of gamma-ray bursts.Nature1992,357, 472–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/357472a0

    work page doi:10.1038/357472a0

  6. [7]

    The Soft Gamma Repeaters as Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars

    Thompson, C.; Duncan, R.C. The Soft Gamma Repeaters as Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars. II. Quiescent Neutrino, X-Ray, and Alfven Wave Emission.Astro. Phys. J.1996,473, 322. https://doi.org/10.1086/178147

    work page doi:10.1086/178147 1996

  7. [8]

    Cosmic Rays from Super-novae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science1934,20, 259–263

    Baade, W.; Zwicky, F. Cosmic Rays from Super-novae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science1934,20, 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.20.5.259

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.20.5.259

  8. [9]

    , year = 1968, month = feb, volume =

    Hewish, A.; Bell, S.J.; Pilkington, J.D.H.; Scott, P .F.; Collins, R.A. Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source.Nature1968,217, 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1038/217709a0

    work page doi:10.1038/217709a0

  9. [10]

    , year = 1968, month = may, volume =

    Gold, T. Rotating Neutron Stars as the Origin of the Pulsating Radio Sources.Nature1968, 218, 731–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/218731a0

    work page doi:10.1038/218731a0

  10. [11]

    Rotating Neutron Stars and the Nature of Pulsars.Nature1969,221, 25–27

    Gold, T. Rotating Neutron Stars and the Nature of Pulsars.Nature1969,221, 25–27. https: //doi.org/10.1038/221025a0

    work page doi:10.1038/221025a0

  11. [12]

    4, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2004

    Lorimer, D.R.; Kramer, M.Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy; Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2004

    2004

  12. [13]

    The Evolution and Structure of Pulsar Wind Nebulae.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2006,44, 17–47, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0601081]

    Gaensler, B.M.; Slane, P .O. The Evolution and Structure of Pulsar Wind Nebulae.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2006,44, 17–47, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0601081]. https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092528

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092528

  13. [14]

    P., Golentskii, S

    Mazets, E.P .; Golentskii, S.V .; Ilinskii, V .N.; Aptekar, R.L.; Guryan, I.A. Observations of a flaring X-ray pulsar in Dorado.Nature1979,282, 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/282587a0

    work page doi:10.1038/282587a0

  14. [15]

    Soft gamma-ray bursts from the source B1900+14

    Mazets, E.P .; Golenetskij, S.V .; Guryan, Y.A. Soft gamma-ray bursts from the source B1900+14. Soviet Astronomy Letters1979,5, 343

  15. [16]

    The soft gamma-ray burst GB790107.Nature1986,322, 152

    Laros, J.G.; Fenimore, E.E.; Fikani, M.M.; Klebesadel, R.W.; Barat, C. The soft gamma-ray burst GB790107.Nature1986,322, 152. https://doi.org/10.1038/322152a0

    work page doi:10.1038/322152a0

  16. [17]

    A new type of repetitive behavior in a high- energy transient.Astro

    Laros, J.G.; Fenimore, E.E.; Klebesadel, R.W.; Atteia, J.L.; Boer, M.; Hurley, K.; Niel, M.; Vedrenne, G.; Kane, S.R.; Kouveliotou, C.; et al. A new type of repetitive behavior in a high- energy transient.Astro. Phys. J. Lett.1987,320, L111–L115. https://doi.org/10.1086/184985

    work page doi:10.1086/184985 1987

  17. [18]

    A Spin-down Variation in the 6 Second X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1048.1-5937.Astro

    Mereghetti, S. A Spin-down Variation in the 6 Second X-Ray Pulsar 1E 1048.1-5937.Astro. Phys. J.1995,455, 598. https://doi.org/10.1086/176607

    work page doi:10.1086/176607 1995

  18. [19]

    2008, A&A Rv, 15, 225, doi: 10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z

    Mereghetti, S. The strongest cosmic magnets: soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X- ray pulsars.Astronomy and Astrophysics Review2008,15, 225–287, [arXiv:astro-ph/0804.0250]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z

  19. [20]

    Turolla, S

    Turolla, R.; Zane, S.; Watts, A.L. Magnetars: the physics behind observations. A review.Reports on Progress in Physics2015,78, 116901, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1507.02924]. https://doi.org/10.108 8/0034-4885/78/11/116901

    work page arXiv

  20. [21]

    Magnetars.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2017, 55, 261–301, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1703.00068]

    Kaspi, V .M.; Beloborodov, A.M. Magnetars.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics2017, 55, 261–301, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1703.00068]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-0 23329

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-0

  21. [22]

    Problems of Gravitational Stability in the Presence of a Magnetic Field.Astro

    Chandrasekhar, S.; Fermi, E. Problems of Gravitational Stability in the Presence of a Magnetic Field.Astro. Phys. J.1953,118, 116. https://doi.org/10.1086/145732

    work page doi:10.1086/145732 1953

  22. [23]

    Cold equation of state in a strong magnetic field - Effects of inverse beta-decay.Astro

    Lai, D.; Shapiro, S.L. Cold equation of state in a strong magnetic field - Effects of inverse beta-decay.Astro. Phys. J.1991,383, 745–751. https://doi.org/10.1086/170831

    work page doi:10.1086/170831 1991

  23. [24]

    ROTATING NEUTRON STAR MODELS WITH MAGNETIC FIELD

    Bocquet, M.; Bonazzola, S.; Gourgoulhon, E.; Novak, J. Rotating neutron star models with a magnetic field.Astron. Astrophysics1995,301, 757, [gr-qc/9503044]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  24. [25]

    C., Lamb, F

    Miller, M.C.; et al. PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter.The Astrophysical Journal Letters2019,887, L24. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5 2041

  25. [26]

    E., Watts, A

    Riley, T.E.; Watts, A.L.; Bogdanov, S.; Ray, P .S.; Ludlam, R.M.; Guillot, S.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Baker, C.L.; Bilous, A.V .; Chakrabarty, D.; et al. A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation.The Astrophysical Journal Letters2019,887, L21. https://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c 2041

  26. [27]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Miller, M.C.; et al.. The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton.The Astrophysical Journal Letters2021,918, L28. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b 2041

  27. [28]

    2017, PhRvL, 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    Abbott, B.P .; et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral.Phys. Rev. Lett.2017,119, 161101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version April 27, 2026 submitted toUniverse 27 of 32

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  28. [29]

    Oertel, M

    Oertel, M.; Hempel, M.; Klähn, T.; Typel, S. Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars.Reviews of Modern Physics2017,89, 015007, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1610.03361]. https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015007

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.015007

  29. [30]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =

    Baym, G.; Hatsuda, T.; Kojo, T.; Powell, P .D.; Song, Y.; Takatsuka, T. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics2018,81, 056902, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1707.04966]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14

  30. [31]

    Heavy baryons in compact stars.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics2023,131, 104041, [arXiv:nucl-th/2212.01086]

    Sedrakian, A.; Li, J.J.; Weber, F. Heavy baryons in compact stars.Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics2023,131, 104041, [arXiv:nucl-th/2212.01086]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104 041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104 2023

  31. [32]

    Massive -resonance admixed hypernuclear stars with antikaon condensations.Phys

    Thapa, V .B.; Sinha, M.; Li, J.J.; Sedrakian, A. Massive -resonance admixed hypernuclear stars with antikaon condensations.Phys. Rev. D2021,103, 063004. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.063004

  32. [33]

    Condensed π− Phase in Neutron-Star Matter.Physical Review Letters1972, 29, 382–385

    Sawyer, R.F. Condensed π− Phase in Neutron-Star Matter.Physical Review Letters1972, 29, 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.382

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.29.382

  33. [34]

    π− Condensate in Dense Nuclear Matter.Physical Review Letters1972,29, 386–388

    Scalapino, D.J. π− Condensate in Dense Nuclear Matter.Physical Review Letters1972,29, 386–388. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.386

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.29.386

  34. [35]

    Strange goings on in dense nucleonic matter.Physics Letters B1986, 175, 57–63

    Kaplan, D.B.; Nelson, A.E. Strange goings on in dense nucleonic matter.Physics Letters B1986, 175, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)90331-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90331-x

  35. [36]

    Cosmic separation of phases.Phys

    Witten, E. Cosmic separation of phases.Phys. Rev. D1984,30, 272–285. https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevD.30.272

  36. [37]

    Weber, F., Ed.Pulsars as astrophysical laboratories for nuclear and particle physics, 1999

    1999

  37. [38]

    Imprints of non-symmetric dark matter haloes on magnetars: a two-fluid perspective.Mon

    Karan, A.; Kumar, A.; Sinha, M.; Mallick, R. Imprints of non-symmetric dark matter haloes on magnetars: a two-fluid perspective.Mon. Not. Roy. Astro. Soc.2025,543, 83–94, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2505.16359]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1410

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1410 2025

  38. [39]

    Strange stars.Astro

    Alcock, C.; Farhi, E.; Olinto, A. Strange stars.Astro. Phys. J.1986,310, 261–272. https: //doi.org/10.1086/164679

    work page doi:10.1086/164679 1986

  39. [40]

    Strange matter.Nuclear Physics A1986,450, 505–506

    Farhi, E. Strange matter.Nuclear Physics A1986,450, 505–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9 474(86)90583-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9

  40. [41]

    The physics and astrophysics of strange matter.Comments Nucl

    Farhi, E. The physics and astrophysics of strange matter.Comments Nucl. Part. Phys., Vol. 16, No. 6, p. 289 - 3051986,16, 289–305

  41. [42]

    Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars

    Haskell, B.; Sedrakian, A. Superfluidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars. In Proceedings of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library; Rezzolla, L.; Pizzochero, P .; Jones, D.I.; Rea, N.; Vidaña, I., Eds., 2018, Vol. 457,Astrophysics and Space Science Library, p. 401, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1709.10340]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7_8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7_8 2018

  42. [43]

    B., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S

    Demorest, P .B.; Pennucci, T.; Ransom, S.M.; Roberts, M.S.E.; Hessels, J.W.T. A two-solar- mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay.Nature2010,467, 1081–1083, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1010.5788]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09466

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09466

  43. [44]

    Antoniadis, P

    Antoniadis, J.; Freire, P .C.C.; Wex, N.; Tauris, T.M.; Lynch, R.S.; van Kerkwijk, M.H.; Kramer, M.; Bassa, C.; Dhillon, V .S.; Driebe, T.; et al. A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary. Science2013,340, 448, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1304.6875]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1233232

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1233232

  44. [45]

    T., Pennucci, T

    Fonseca, E.; Cromartie, H.T.; Pennucci, T.T.; Ray, P .S.; Kirichenko, A.Y.; Ransom, S.M.; De- morest, P .B.; Stairs, I.H.; Arzoumanian, Z.; Guillemot, L.; et al. Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620.Astro. Phys. J. Lett.2021,915, L12, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2104.00880]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac03b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac03b8 2021

  45. [46]

    Atmospheric Circulation on Black Widow Companions.Astro

    Kandel, D.; Romani, R.W. Atmospheric Circulation on Black Widow Companions.Astro. Phys. J.2020,892, 101, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2002.12483]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b62

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b62 2020

  46. [47]

    Physical Review , year = 1939, month = feb, volume =

    Tolman, R.C. Static Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid.Physical Review 1939,55, 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.55.364

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.364 1939

  47. [48]

    R., & Volkoff, G

    Oppenheimer, J.R.; Volkoff, G.M. On Massive Neutron Cores.Physical Review1939,55, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.55.374

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.374

  48. [49]

    Direct Observation of the Cooling of the Cassiopeia A Neutron Star.Astro

    Heinke, C.O.; Ho, W.C.G. Direct Observation of the Cooling of the Cassiopeia A Neutron Star.Astro. Phys. J. Lett.2010,719, L167–L171, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1007.4719]. https: //doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L167. https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version April 27, 2026 submitted toUniverse 28 of 32

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/l167 2010

  49. [50]

    The Equation of State of Neutron Star Matter in Strong Magnetic Fields.Astro

    Broderick, A.; Prakash, M.; Lattimer, J.M. The Equation of State of Neutron Star Matter in Strong Magnetic Fields.Astro. Phys. J.2000,537, 351–367, [astro-ph/0001537]. https: //doi.org/10.1086/309010

    work page doi:10.1086/309010 2000

  50. [51]

    Macroscopic effects in cold magnetized nucleons and electrons with anomalous magnetic moments.Phys

    Khalilov, V .R. Macroscopic effects in cold magnetized nucleons and electrons with anomalous magnetic moments.Phys. Rev. D2002,65, 056001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.056 001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.056

  51. [52]

    Anisotropic hydrodynamics, bulk viscosities, and r-modes of strange quark stars with strong magnetic fields.Phys

    Huang, X.G.; Huang, M.; Rischke, D.H.; Sedrakian, A. Anisotropic hydrodynamics, bulk viscosities, and r-modes of strange quark stars with strong magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. D2010, 81, 045015, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0910.3633]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.045015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.045015

  52. [53]

    Thermodynamics of neutrons in a magnetic field and its implications for neutron stars.Phys

    Ferrer, E.J.; Hackebill, A. Thermodynamics of neutrons in a magnetic field and its implications for neutron stars.Phys. Rev. C2019,99, 065803, [arXiv:nucl-th/1903.08224]. https://doi.org/10 .1103/PhysRevC.99.065803

    work page arXiv 1903

  53. [54]

    Nicolás, The bar derived category of a curved dg algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 212 (2008) 2633–2659

    Sinha, M.; Mukhopadhyay, B.; Sedrakian, A. Hypernuclear matter in strong magnetic field. Nuclear Physics A2013,898, 43–58, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1209.5611]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2012.12.076

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2012

  54. [55]

    Ferrer, Vivian de la Incera, Jason P

    Ferrer, E.J.; de La Incera, V .; Keith, J.P .; Portillo, I.; Springsteen, P .L. Equation of state of a dense and magnetized fermion system.Phys. Rev. C2010,82, 065802, [arXiv:hep-ph/1009.3521]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.065802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.065802

  55. [56]

    Equation of state for the magnetic-color- flavor-locked phase and its implications for compact star models.Phys

    Paulucci, L.; Ferrer, E.J.; de La Incera, V .; Horvath, J.E. Equation of state for the magnetic-color- flavor-locked phase and its implications for compact star models.Phys. Rev. D2011,83, 043009, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1010.3041]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.043009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.043009

  56. [57]

    Consistent neutron star models with magnetic- field-dependent equations of state.Mon

    Chatterjee, D.; Elghozi, T.; Novak, J.; Oertel, M. Consistent neutron star models with magnetic- field-dependent equations of state.Mon. Not. Roy. Astro. Soc.2015,447, 3785–3796, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1410.6332]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2706

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2706 2015

  57. [58]

    Quantizing Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics.Fundam

    Canuto, V .; Ventura, J. Quantizing Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics.Fundam. Cosmic Phys.1977, 2, 203–353

    1977

  58. [59]

    Surface structure of neutron stars with high magnetic fields.Astro

    Fushiki, I.; Gudmundsson, E.H.; Pethick, C.J. Surface structure of neutron stars with high magnetic fields.Astro. Phys. J.1989,342, 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/167653

    work page doi:10.1086/167653 1989

  59. [60]

    Equation of state in a strong magnetic field - Finite temperature and gradient corrections.Astro

    Abrahams, A.M.; Shapiro, S.L. Equation of state in a strong magnetic field - Finite temperature and gradient corrections.Astro. Phys. J.1991,374, 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1086/170151

    work page doi:10.1086/170151 1991

  60. [61]

    Matter in a magnetic field in the Thomas-Fermi and related theories.Annals of Physics1992,216, 29–72

    Fushiki, I.; Gudmundsson, E.H.; Pethick, C.J.; Yngvason, J. Matter in a magnetic field in the Thomas-Fermi and related theories.Annals of Physics1992,216, 29–72. https://doi.org/10.101 6/0003-4916(52)90041-9

  61. [62]

    Thomas-Fermi Calculations of Atoms and Matter in Magnetic Neutron Stars: Effects of Higher Landau Bands

    Roegnvaldsson, O.E.; Fushiki, I.; Gudmundsson, E.H.; Pethick, C.J.; Yngvason, J. Thomas-Fermi Calculations of Atoms and Matter in Magnetic Neutron Stars: Effects of Higher Landau Bands. Astro. Phys. J.1993,416, 276. https://doi.org/10.1086/173234

    work page doi:10.1086/173234 1993

  62. [63]

    46 Serot, B

    Walecka, J.D. A theory of highly condensed matter.Annals of Physics1974,83, 491–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(74)90208-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90208-5

  63. [64]

    48 Ring, P., Gambhir, Y

    Boguta, J.; Bodmer, A.R. Relativistic calculation of nuclear matter and the nuclear surface. Nuclear Physics A1977,292, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90626-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(77)90626-1

  64. [65]

    Nuclear equation of state with derivative scalar coupling.Phys

    Zimanyi, J.; Moszkowski, S.A. Nuclear equation of state with derivative scalar coupling.Phys. Rev. C1990,42, 1416–1421. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.42.1416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.42.1416

  65. [66]

    Rearrangement in the density dependent relativistic field theory of nuclei

    Lenske, H.; Fuchs, C. Rearrangement in the density dependent relativistic field theory of nuclei. Physics Letters B1995,345, 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)01664-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)01664-x

  66. [67]

    Density dependent hadron field theory.Phys

    Fuchs, C.; Lenske, H.; Wolter, H.H. Density dependent hadron field theory.Phys. Rev. C1995, 52, 3043–3060, [arXiv:nucl-th/nucl-th/9507044]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.52.3043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.52.3043

  67. [68]

    Role of hyperons and pions in neutron stars and supernova.Zeitschrift fur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei1987,327, 295–300

    Glendenning, N.K. Role of hyperons and pions in neutron stars and supernova.Zeitschrift fur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei1987,327, 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284453

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01284453

  68. [69]

    Hyperons in neutron stars.Zeitschrift fur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei1987, 326, 57–64

    Glendenning, N.K. Hyperons in neutron stars.Zeitschrift fur Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei1987, 326, 57–64

  69. [70]

    The hyperon composition of neutron stars.Physics Letters B1982,114, 392–

    Glendenning, N.K. The hyperon composition of neutron stars.Physics Letters B1982,114, 392–

  70. [71]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90078-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90078-8

  71. [72]

    Neutron stars are giant hypernuclei?Astro

    Glendenning, N.K. Neutron stars are giant hypernuclei?Astro. Phys. J.1985,293, 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1086/163253. https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version April 27, 2026 submitted toUniverse 29 of 32

    work page doi:10.1086/163253 1985

  72. [73]

    Cold Ideal Equation of State for Strongly Magnetized Neutron Star Matter: Effects on Muon Production and Pion Condensation.Astro

    Suh, I.S.; Mathews, G.J. Cold Ideal Equation of State for Strongly Magnetized Neutron Star Matter: Effects on Muon Production and Pion Condensation.Astro. Phys. J.2001,546, 1126–1136, [astro-ph/9912301]. https://doi.org/10.1086/318277

    work page doi:10.1086/318277 2001

  73. [74]

    Stellar matter with a strong magnetic field within density-dependent relativistic models.Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics2008,35, 125201, [arXiv:nucl-th/0810.3390]

    Rabhi, A.; Providência, C.; Da Providência, J. Stellar matter with a strong magnetic field within density-dependent relativistic models.Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics2008,35, 125201, [arXiv:nucl-th/0810.3390]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/35/12/125201

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/35/12/125201

  74. [75]

    Dense Nuclear Matter in a Strong Magnetic Field.Physical Review Letters1997,78, 2898–2901, [astro-ph/9703034]

    Chakrabarty, S.; Bandyopadhyay, D.; Pal, S. Dense Nuclear Matter in a Strong Magnetic Field.Physical Review Letters1997,78, 2898–2901, [astro-ph/9703034]. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.78.2898

    work page arXiv

  75. [76]

    Rapid cooling of magnetized neutron stars

    Bandyopadhyay, D.; Chakrabarty, S.; Dey, P .; Pal, S. Rapid cooling of magnetized neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D1998,58, 121301, [astro-ph/9804145]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.12130 1

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.12130

  76. [77]

    The Influence of the Magnetic Field on the Properties of Neutron Star Matter.Modern Physics Letters A2007,22, 623–629, [astro-ph/0505113]

    Chen, W.; Zhang, P .Q.; Liu, L.G. The Influence of the Magnetic Field on the Properties of Neutron Star Matter.Modern Physics Letters A2007,22, 623–629, [astro-ph/0505113]. https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0217732307023213

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732307023213

  77. [78]

    Self-consistent hartree description of finite nuclei in a relativistic quantum field theory.Nuclear Physics A1981,368, 503–528

    Horowitz, C.J.; Serot, B.D. Self-consistent hartree description of finite nuclei in a relativistic quantum field theory.Nuclear Physics A1981,368, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-947 4(81)90770-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-947

  78. [79]

    Reconciliation of neutron-star masses and binding of the Lambda in hypernuclei.Physical Review Letters1991,67, 2414–1417

    Glendenning, N.K.; Moszkowski, S.A. Reconciliation of neutron-star masses and binding of the Lambda in hypernuclei.Physical Review Letters1991,67, 2414–1417. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.67.2414

  79. [80]

    Neutron Star Composition in Strong Magnetic Fields.Chinese Physics Letters2003,20, 1238–1241, [astro-ph/0111374]

    Mao, G.J.; Kondratyev, V .N.; Iwamoto, A.; Li, Z.X.; Wu, X.Z.; Greiner, W.; Mikhailov, I.N. Neutron Star Composition in Strong Magnetic Fields.Chinese Physics Letters2003,20, 1238–1241, [astro-ph/0111374]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/20/8/315

    work page doi:10.1088/0256-307x/20/8/315

  80. [81]

    Cluster Magnetic Fields

    Yakovlev, D.G.; Pethick, C.J. Neutron Star Cooling.Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2004,42, 169–210, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0402143]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro. 42.053102.134013

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro 2004

Showing first 80 references.