arxiv: 2604.23327 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 💻 cs.RO

Recognition: unknown

An Efficient Beam Search Algorithm for Active Perception in Mobile Robotics

Kaixian Qu , Han Wang , Victor Klemm , Cesar Cadena , Marco Hutter

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO

keywords active perceptionbeam searchpath planningmobile robotsfrontier explorationgraph constructionrobot navigationautonomous systems

0 comments

The pith

Node-wise beam search with expected gain and random annulus graphs outperforms prior methods for active perception in robots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to improve how mobile robots decide their paths to gather the most useful sensor data for tasks like mapping or detection. Existing solutions either compute expensive traveling salesman tours over selected points or restrict paths to tree structures that may miss good options. The authors replace these with a node-wise beam search that keeps multiple promising paths ending at each location, an expected gain score that accounts for unexplored frontiers, and a new way to build the underlying graph using random annuli that keeps orientation choices open and stays connected even in obstacles. A sympathetic reader would care because this promises faster, more effective planning that works on real hardware without heavy parameter tuning or excessive compute.

Core claim

The central claim is that a node-wise beam search (NBS) algorithm, which preserves the top-B candidate paths per node instead of globally, combined with an expected gain metric incorporating frontiers and a rapidly-exploring random annulus graph (RRAG) for constructing the search graph, delivers the highest performance on three standard active perception tasks and beats existing algorithms by at least 20 percent in at least one metric.

What carries the argument

Node-wise beam search (NBS), which maintains the top-B paths ending at each individual node to explore the solution space more effectively than standard beam search while remaining computationally tractable.

If this is right

NBS maintains strong performance even when the beam width is kept small, improving scalability.
The expected gain metric balances exploration of new areas with exploitation of known information better than prior path selection rules.
RRAG constructs graphs that preserve full orientation sampling and guarantee connectivity via a fallback planner in cluttered spaces.
The full NBS-plus-RRAG pipeline works on physical robots across varied real-world scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the per-node beam maintenance generalizes, it could replace TSP solvers in other robotic planning domains where global optimality is intractable.
Combining the expected gain with learned predictors of information could further reduce the need for explicit frontier computation.
RRAG's annulus sampling might extend to higher-dimensional state spaces for more complex robot platforms.

Load-bearing premise

That keeping the best paths per node rather than globally will consistently yield higher-quality final paths without creating new local optima or demanding per-scene retuning of the beam width parameter.

What would settle it

An experiment on a fixed set of benchmark graphs and environments where the NBS-plus-RRAG combination produces lower information gain or success rates than a standard TSP-based planner or global beam search at equivalent compute limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23327 by Cesar Cadena, Han Wang, Kaixian Qu, Marco Hutter, Victor Klemm.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Surface reconstruction in hardware experiments. view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Paper organization overview. Circled numbers indicate the corresponding sections. In the graph a priori and online perception settings, the environment is represented as a graph, either fully known or partially known. In contrast, active perception necessitates graph construction from the collision-free state space. The path selection strategy encompasses both selection criteria and replanning frequencies,… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Examples of IPP graphs. Each node has an associated gain, each edge a cost, and vs denotes the start node. Revisiting nodes can be advantageous. For example, the optimal solution in (b) requires multiple traversals of v3. 3.1 Graph A Priori Formulation We first consider the case in which the environment is fully known in advance and represented as a directed simple graph as in Equation (3). In this formula… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The illustration of path selection criteria. view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Repeated edges can be removed to construct a view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Illustrations of four types of graphs used for benchmarking. view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Average computation time in the graph a priori experiments. view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The range of final collected gain in the graph a priori scenario. view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The range of final collected gain in the graph online perception scenario. view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The necessity of the FLS in narrow passages. view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Example of the RRAG with all orientations preserved. view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Eight HSSD scenarios used in the active perception simulation environment. view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Visualization of an agent navigating to collect points represented as golden rings. view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Qualitative comparison of surface reconstruction for scene 102816852. view at source ↗

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: The mean and half the standard deviation of accumulated gain across large HSSD scenarios. view at source ↗

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: The mean and half the standard deviation of accumulated gain across small HSSD scenarios. view at source ↗

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: Comparison of normalized gain across methods and tasks. view at source ↗

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Autonomous surface reconstruction using surface frontiers as the gain. view at source ↗

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: Autonomous volumetric exploration using unknown voxels as the gain. view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Active perception is a fundamental problem in autonomous robotics in which the robot must decide where to move and what to sense in order to obtain the most informative observations for accomplishing its mission. Existing approaches either solve a computationally expensive traveling salesman problem over heuristically selected informative nodes, or adopt a more efficient but overly constrained shortest path tree formulation. To address these limitations, we explore beam search algorithms as scalable alternatives. While the standard beam search provides scalability by preserving the top-B paths at each depth level, it is prone to local optima and exhibits parameter sensitivity. Our first contribution is a node-wise beam search (NBS) algorithm, which maintains top-B candidates per node to enable more effective exploration of the solution space. Systematic benchmarking on graphs shows that NBS consistently outperforms other baselines and maintains strong performance even at low beam widths. As a second contribution, we integrate the concept of frontiers into the path selection criterion, introducing the expected gain metric, which better balances exploration and exploitation compared to existing alternatives. Our third contribution proposes the rapidly-exploring random annulus graph (RRAG), a novel graph construction method that preserves full orientation sampling and ensures connectivity in cluttered environments through a fallback local sampling-based planner. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NBS combined with RRAG achieves the highest performance across all three representative active perception tasks, outperforming state-of-the-art algorithms by at least 20% in one or more tasks. We further validate the approach on real robotic platforms in different scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces node-wise beam search plus an expected-gain frontier and RRAG graph construction as practical fixes for active perception planning, and the reported experiments show it beating TSP baselines by noticeable margins on the tested tasks.

read the letter

The core advance here is replacing depth-wise beam search with a node-wise version that keeps the top B candidates at each node, then scoring paths with an expected-gain metric that incorporates frontiers, and building the underlying graph with RRAG to keep connectivity in clutter. These pieces are presented as direct responses to the computational cost of TSP formulations and the rigidity of shortest-path trees. The graph benchmarks indicate NBS holds performance even when B is small, and the real-robot runs on three tasks back the claim of at least 20% improvement in some metrics over the baselines they compare against.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes node-wise beam search (NBS), which maintains the top-B candidate paths per node rather than per depth level, an expected-gain path-selection metric that incorporates frontier information, and the rapidly-exploring random annulus graph (RRAG) construction that preserves orientation sampling with a fallback local planner for connectivity. It claims that NBS+RRAG yields the highest performance on three representative active-perception tasks, outperforming prior TSP and shortest-path-tree baselines by at least 20% in one or more tasks, while remaining effective at low beam widths, and validates the approach on physical robots.

Significance. If the reported gains prove robust, the work supplies a practical, scalable alternative to expensive TSP formulations and overly constrained tree structures for active perception. Systematic graph benchmarking and real-robot experiments are strengths; the introduction of per-node beam maintenance and a frontier-aware selection criterion could improve exploration-exploitation balance in cluttered environments.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim that NBS+RRAG 'outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms by at least 20% in one or more tasks' is presented without any quantitative detail on experimental controls, baseline implementations, statistical significance tests, or data-exclusion rules, making it impossible to verify robustness of the headline performance numbers.
[Experimental Evaluation] Experimental section (benchmarking and task results): the comparison to standard beam search and TSP formulations must include explicit checks that node-wise pruning does not discard globally optimal combinations when informative nodes are sparsely connected or when frontier estimates are noisy; without such analysis the claim that NBS avoids new local-optima traps remains untested.
[Method] Method (expected-gain metric definition): the metric is asserted to balance exploration and exploitation better than alternatives, yet the manuscript provides no derivation or sensitivity analysis showing how small errors in frontier prediction affect path quality; this directly bears on whether the method truly mitigates the local-optima problem identified for vanilla beam search.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract lists three representative active-perception tasks but does not name them or cite the corresponding evaluation environments; adding these references would improve clarity.
Notation for beam width B and the expected-gain function should be introduced once with a single consistent symbol and then used uniformly in all equations and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim that NBS+RRAG 'outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms by at least 20% in one or more tasks' is presented without any quantitative detail on experimental controls, baseline implementations, statistical significance tests, or data-exclusion rules, making it impossible to verify robustness of the headline performance numbers.

Authors: The abstract serves as a high-level summary of contributions and key results. Full details on experimental controls, baseline implementations (including TSP solvers and standard beam search), multiple-run statistics, and data handling are provided in Section 5. We did not embed p-values or exclusion criteria in the abstract due to space limits. We will partially revise the abstract to add a brief clause noting that results derive from systematic benchmarking across three tasks with standard controls, explicitly directing readers to the experimental section for verification. revision: partial
Referee: [Experimental Evaluation] Experimental section (benchmarking and task results): the comparison to standard beam search and TSP formulations must include explicit checks that node-wise pruning does not discard globally optimal combinations when informative nodes are sparsely connected or when frontier estimates are noisy; without such analysis the claim that NBS avoids new local-optima traps remains untested.

Authors: This point is well taken. Section 4 already benchmarks NBS against standard beam search and TSP on graphs of varying density, including sparse connectivity cases, where NBS shows consistent gains without apparent loss of optimal combinations. However, we have not added explicit noise injection to frontier estimates. In revision we will incorporate a new analysis subsection that tests NBS under simulated frontier noise on both synthetic sparse graphs and real-environment maps, confirming that node-wise maintenance does not create additional local-optima traps beyond those of vanilla beam search. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method (expected-gain metric definition): the metric is asserted to balance exploration and exploitation better than alternatives, yet the manuscript provides no derivation or sensitivity analysis showing how small errors in frontier prediction affect path quality; this directly bears on whether the method truly mitigates the local-optima problem identified for vanilla beam search.

Authors: We agree that additional justification would strengthen the claim. The expected-gain metric is defined in Section 3.2 as a weighted sum of information gains that incorporates frontier probabilities. While empirical results in Section 5 demonstrate improved balance over alternatives, no formal derivation or sensitivity study to frontier errors appears in the current manuscript. We will add both a short derivation and a sensitivity analysis in the revised version, quantifying the effect of small frontier-prediction perturbations on path quality and local-optima avoidance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; algorithmic definitions and empirical validation are independent

full rationale

The paper introduces novel algorithmic components (node-wise beam search, expected-gain frontier metric, and RRAG graph construction) and validates them via benchmarking on graphs and real-robot experiments across three active-perception tasks. No equations, predictions, or performance claims reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or renamed inputs within the paper. The superiority statements rest on independent empirical comparisons rather than tautological derivations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that graph-based modeling of environments is sufficient, that beam width is a tunable but non-critical hyperparameter, and that the new algorithmic components (NBS, RRAG, expected gain) deliver measurable gains without hidden fitting or selection effects.

free parameters (1)

beam width B
Controls how many candidate paths are retained at each step; performance is stated to remain strong at low values but the value itself must be chosen.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The robot's workspace can be discretized into a graph whose nodes represent informative sensing locations.
Underlies both the beam-search formulation and the RRAG construction.

invented entities (3)

Node-wise beam search (NBS) no independent evidence
purpose: Maintains top-B candidates per node rather than globally to improve exploration.
New algorithmic structure introduced to mitigate local-optima issues of standard beam search.
Expected gain metric no independent evidence
purpose: Path selection criterion that incorporates frontiers to balance exploration and exploitation.
New scoring function replacing prior alternatives.
Rapidly-exploring random annulus graph (RRAG) no independent evidence
purpose: Graph construction that preserves orientation sampling and guarantees connectivity via fallback local planning.
Novel sampling-based graph generator for cluttered environments.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5565 in / 1515 out tokens · 132494 ms · 2026-05-08T08:03:29.445310+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

[1]

Objectnav revisited: On evaluation of embodied agents navigating to objects.arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.13171, 2020

Ahuja R, Batra J and Gupta S (1983) Combinatorial optimization with rational objective functions: A communication.Mathe- matics of Operations Research8(2): 314–314. Arora S and Scherer S (2017) Randomized algorithm for informative path planning with budget constraints. In:2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 4997...

work page arXiv 1983
[2]

Cao Y , Wang Y , Vashisth A, Fan H and Sartoretti GA (2023) Catnipp: Context-aware attention-based network for informative path planning

Cao N, Low KH and Dolan JM (2013) Multi-robot informative path planning for active sensing of environmental phenomena: A tale of two algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.0723. Cao Y , Wang Y , Vashisth A, Fan H and Sartoretti GA (2023) Catnipp: Context-aware attention-based network for informative path planning. In:Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, pp. ...

work page arXiv 2013
[3]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03669

Chen W, Liu L and Khardon R (2024b) Poam: Probabilistic online attentive mapping for efficient robotic information gathering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03669. Cherkassky BV and Goldberg A V (1999) Negative-cycle detection algorithms.Mathematical Programming85(2). Cieslewski T, Kaufmann E and Scaramuzza D (2017) Rapid exploration with multi-rotors: A front...

work page arXiv 1999
[4]

27 Conway JH and Sloane NJA (2013)Sphere packings, lattices and groups, volume

Prepared usingsagej.cls Qu et al. 27 Conway JH and Sloane NJA (2013)Sphere packings, lattices and groups, volume

2013
[5]

Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL and Stein C (2022) Introduction to algorithms

Springer Science & Business Media. Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL and Stein C (2022) Introduction to algorithms. MIT press. Dang T, Tranzatto M, Khattak S, Mascarich F, Alexis K and Hutter M (2020) Graph-based subterranean exploration path planning using aerial and legged robots.Journal of Field Robotics37(8): 1363–1388. Dantzig GB, Blattner W and Rao...

2022
[6]

In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Fu Z, Zurbr ¨ugg R, Qu K, Pollefeys M, Hutter M, Blum H and Bauer Z (2026) Funfact: Building probabilistic functional 3d scene graphs via factor-graph reasoning. In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Galhotra S, Mazumdar A, Pal S and Saha B (2019) Connectivity of random annulus graphs and the geometri...

2026
[7]

Springer

Glover F and Laguna M (1998)Tabu search. Springer. Goli L, Reading C, Sell´an S, Jacobson A and Tagliasacchi A (2024) Bayes’ rays: Uncertainty quantification for neural radiance fields. In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 20061–20070. Google (2025) Or-tools - google optimization tools. URLhttps: //deve...

1998
[8]

Fisherrf: Active view selection and uncertainty quantification for radiance fields using fisher information

IEEE, pp. 2719–2726. Huang J, Zhou B, Fan Z, Zhu Y , Jie Y , Li L and Cheng H (2023) Fael: Fast autonomous exploration for large-scale environments with a mobile robot.IEEE robotics and automation letters8(3): 1667–1674. Hutter M, Gehring C, Jud D, Lauber A, Bellicoso CD, Tsounis V , Hwangbo J, Bodie K, Fankhauser P, Bloesch M, Diethelm R, Bachmann S, Mel...

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

995–1001

IEEE, pp. 995–1001. LaValle S (1998) Rapidly-exploring random trees: A new tool for path planning.Research Report

1998
[10]

LaValle SM and Kuffner Jr JJ (2001) Randomized kinodynamic planning.The international journal of robotics research20(5): 378–400. Lawler EL (1972) Optimal cycles in graphs and the minimal cost-to-time ratio problem.Periodic Optimization: Volume I: Course Held at the Department of Automation and Prepared usingsagej.cls 28 Journal Title XX(X) Information, J...

work page arXiv 2001
[11]

In:2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA)

Popovi´c M, Hitz G, Nieto J, Sa I, Siegwart R and Galceran E (2017) Online informative path planning for active classification using uavs. In:2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 5753–5758. Popovi´c M, Vidal-Calleja T, Hitz G, Chung JJ, Sa I, Siegwart R and Nieto J (2020) An informative path planning framework fo...

work page arXiv 2017
[12]

In:2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

R¨uckin J, Jin L and Popovi ´c M (2022) Adaptive informative path planning using deep reinforcement learning for uav-based active sensing. In:2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 4473–4479. Rush AM, Chang YW and Collins M (2013) Optimal beam search for machine translation. In:Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empi...

work page arXiv 2022
[13]

Witting C, Fehr M, B ¨ahnemann R, Oleynikova H and Siegwart R (2018) History-aware autonomous exploration in confined environments using mavs

V oudouris C (1997)Guided local search for combinatorial optimisation problems.PhD Thesis, University of Essex. Witting C, Fehr M, B ¨ahnemann R, Oleynikova H and Siegwart R (2018) History-aware autonomous exploration in confined environments using mavs. In:2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 1–9. Xu ...

1997