pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24835 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

JWST Constraints on Primordial Magnetic Fields

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords pmfsfieldsmagneticprimordialreionisationabundanceactingapprox
0
0 comments X

The pith

JWST UV luminosity function calibration of reionization history bounds primordial magnetic fields to √<B²> < 0.27 nG (n_B=-2) and < 0.18 nG (n_B=2) at 95% CL by ruling out double reionization at z≈24.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Primordial magnetic fields are weak magnetic fields thought to have existed since the Big Bang. They exert a Lorentz force on charged gas particles, helping tiny clumps collapse into the first galaxies earlier than they otherwise would. The authors model how this extra early structure speeds up reionization—the process that made the universe transparent again. Using JWST measurements of early galaxies to fix the reionization timeline, they find that strong fields produce two separate reionization episodes, one at very high redshift. This double episode would leave a signature in the cosmic microwave background that is not observed, so the fields cannot be too strong.

Core claim

strong PMFs induce a characteristic double reionisation at z ≈ 24 that is incompatible with CMB measurements of the optical depth, yielding √<B²> < 0.27 nG and < 0.18 nG for n_B = -2 and n_B = 2 respectively at 95% CL using Planck priors on τ.

Load-bearing premise

The reionisation history is accurately calibrated solely with the UV luminosity function from JWST data, and the modeled boost to low-mass halo abundance from the Lorentz force on baryons contains no significant unaccounted systematics or alternative explanations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24835 by Juan Urrutia, Malcolm Fairbairn, Mar\'ia Olalla Olea-Romacho, Ville Vaskonen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. UVLFs for CDM best fit (black dashed) and for the view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Posteriors from the UVLF fit. The contours show the view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Posteriors the reionization fit for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Reionisation histories varying the PMF strength view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Same as Fig view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) enhance small-scale structure formation through the Lorentz force acting on baryons, boosting the abundance of low-mass halos and their hosted galaxies. We show that the reionisation history calibrated with the UV luminosity function (UVLF) provides stringent bounds: strong PMFs induce a characteristic double reionisation at $z \approx 24$ that is incompatible with CMB measurements of the optical depth, yielding $\sqrt{\left\langle B^2 \right\rangle} < 0.27\,{\rm nG}$ and $< 0.18\,{\rm nG}$ for $n_B = -2$ and $n_B = 2$ respectively at $95\%\,{\rm CL}$ using Planck priors on $\tau$. This establishes early galaxy observables as among the most sensitive probes of PMFs in Gaussian, non-helical scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard cosmological modeling of reionization and the Lorentz-force effect of PMFs on baryons; no new entities are postulated, but several domain assumptions are required.

free parameters (2)
  • n_B
    Magnetic field power spectrum index; fixed to discrete values -2 and 2 rather than fitted continuously.
  • B amplitude
    Field strength amplitude; the quantity being bounded rather than fitted, but its effect is modeled through halo abundance.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Standard Lambda-CDM cosmology governs structure formation and reionization
    Invoked throughout the modeling of halo abundance and reionization history.
  • domain assumption PMFs are Gaussian and non-helical
    Explicitly stated as the scenario under which the bounds apply.
  • domain assumption UV luminosity function from JWST accurately traces the reionization photon budget
    Used to calibrate the reionization history that is then compared to CMB τ.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5463 in / 1553 out tokens · 48897 ms · 2026-05-07T17:56:18.589743+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Stevenson,Planetary Magnetic Fields: Achievements and Prospects,Space Sci

    D.J. Stevenson,Planetary Magnetic Fields: Achievements and Prospects,Space Sci. Rev.152(2010) 651

  2. [2]

    Reiners,Observations of Cool-Star Magnetic Fields, Living Rev

    A. Reiners,Observations of Cool-Star Magnetic Fields, Living Rev. Sol. Phys.9(2012) 1 [1203.0241]

  3. [3]

    Beck,Galactic and Extragalactic Magnetic Fields, AIP Conf

    R. Beck,Galactic and Extragalactic Magnetic Fields, AIP Conf. Proc.1085(2009) 83 [0810.2923]

  4. [4]

    Beck and R

    R. Beck and R. Wielebinski,Magnetic Fields in the Milky Way and in Galaxies, (2013), DOI [1302.5663]

  5. [5]

    Vogt and T.A

    C. Vogt and T.A. Ensslin,A Bayesian view on Faraday rotation maps - Seeing the magnetic power spectra in galaxy clusters,Astron. Astrophys.434(2005) 67 [astro-ph/0501211]

  6. [6]

    Osinga, R.J

    E. Osinga, R.J. van Weeren, F. Andrade-Santos, L. Rudnick, A. Bonafede, T. Clarke et al.,The detection of cluster magnetic fields via radio source depolarisation, Astron. Astrophys.665(2022) A71 [2207.09717]

  7. [7]

    Robishaw, E

    T. Robishaw, E. Quataert and C. Heiles,Extragalactic Zeeman Detections in OH Megamasers,Astrophys. J. 680(2008) 981 [0803.1832]

  8. [8]

    McBride and C

    J. McBride and C. Heiles,An Arecibo Survey for Zeeman Splitting in OH Megamaser Galaxies, Astrophys. J.763(2013) 8 [1211.2023]

  9. [9]

    Bernet, F

    M.L. Bernet, F. Miniati, S.J. Lilly, P.P. Kronberg and M. Dessauges-Zavadsky,Strong magnetic fields in normal galaxies at high redshifts,Nature454(2008) 302 [0807.3347]

  10. [10]

    Geach, E

    J.E. Geach, E. Lopez-Rodriguez, M.J. Doherty, J. Chen, R.J. Ivison, G.J. Bendo et al.,Polarized thermal emission from dust in a galaxy at redshift 2.6, Nature621(2023) 483 [2309.02034]

  11. [11]

    Schober, D.R.G

    J. Schober, D.R.G. Schleicher and R.S. Klessen, Magnetic Field Amplification in Young Galaxies, Astron. Astrophys.560(2013) A87 [1310.0853]

  12. [12]

    Martin-Alvarez, J

    S. Martin-Alvarez, J. Devriendt, A. Slyz, D. Sijacki, M.L.A. Richardson and H. Katz,Towards convergence of turbulent dynamo amplification in cosmological simulations of galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 513(2022) 3326 [2111.06901]

  13. [13]

    Hanayama, K

    H. Hanayama, K. Takahashi, K. Kotake, M. Oguri, K. Ichiki and H. Ohno,Biermann mechanism in primordial supernova remnant and seed magnetic fields, Astrophys. J.633(2005) 941 [astro-ph/0501538]

  14. [14]

    S. Sur, C. Federrath, D.R.G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee and R.S. Klessen,Magnetic field amplification during gravitational collapse - Influence of initial conditions on dynamo evolution and saturation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423(2012) 3148 [1202.3206]

  15. [15]

    Biermann, ¨Uber den Ursprung der Magnetfelder auf Sternen und im interstellaren Raum (miteinem Anhang von A

    L. Biermann, ¨Uber den Ursprung der Magnetfelder auf Sternen und im interstellaren Raum (miteinem Anhang von A. Schl¨ uter),Zeitschrift Naturforschung Teil A5 (1950) 65

  16. [16]

    Turner and L.M

    M.S. Turner and L.M. Widrow,Inflation Produced, Large Scale Magnetic Fields,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 2743

  17. [17]

    Ratra,Cosmological ’seed’ magnetic field from inflation,Astrophys

    B. Ratra,Cosmological ’seed’ magnetic field from inflation,Astrophys. J. Lett.391(1992) L1

  18. [18]

    Vachaspati,Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions,Phys

    T. Vachaspati,Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Lett. B265(1991) 258

  19. [19]

    Sigl, A.V

    G. Sigl, A.V. Olinto and K. Jedamzik,Primordial magnetic fields from cosmological first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 4582 [astro-ph/9610201]

  20. [20]

    Enqvist and P

    K. Enqvist and P. Olesen,On primordial magnetic fields of electroweak origin,Phys. Lett. B319(1993) 178 [hep-ph/9308270]

  21. [21]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, M. Lewicki, V. Vaskonen and A. Wickens,Intergalactic Magnetic Fields from First-Order Phase Transitions,JCAP09(2019) 019 [1907.04315]

  22. [22]

    Balaji, M

    S. Balaji, M. Fairbairn and M.O. Olea-Romacho, Magnetogenesis with gravitational waves and primordial black hole dark matter,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075048 [2402.05179]

  23. [23]

    Olea-Romacho,Primordial magnetogenesis in the two-Higgs-doublet model,Phys

    M.O. Olea-Romacho,Primordial magnetogenesis in the two-Higgs-doublet model,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015023 [2310.19948]

  24. [24]

    Olea-Romacho, M

    M.O. Olea-Romacho, M. Fairbairn and P. Ralegankar, Can WIMPs survive the legacy of a magnetised early Universe?,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 044 [2507.18692]

  25. [25]

    Donnert, K

    J. Donnert, K. Dolag, H. Lesch and E. Muller,Cluster Magnetic Fields from Galactic Outflows,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.392(2009) 1008 [0808.0919]

  26. [26]

    Vazza, M

    F. Vazza, M. Br¨ uggen, C. Gheller and P. Wang,On the amplification of magnetic fields in cosmic filaments and galaxy clusters,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.445(2014) 3706 [1409.2640]

  27. [27]

    Govoni, E

    F. Govoni, E. Orr` u, A. Bonafede, M. Iacobelli, R. Paladino, F. Vazza et al.,A radio ridge connecting two galaxy clusters in a filament of the cosmic web, Science364(2019) 981–984

  28. [28]

    Evidence for strong extragalactic magnetic fields from Fermi observations of TeV blazars

    A. Neronov and I. Vovk,Evidence for strong extragalactic magnetic fields from Fermi observations of TeV blazars,Science328(2010) 73 [1006.3504]

  29. [29]

    Broderick, P

    A.E. Broderick, P. Chang and C. Pfrommer,The Cosmological Impact of Luminous TeV Blazars I: Implications of Plasma Instabilities for the Intergalactic Magnetic Field and Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background,Astrophys. J.752(2012) 22 [1106.5494]

  30. [30]

    Wasserman,On the origins of galaxies, galactic angular momenta, and galactic magnetic fields., ApJ 224(1978) 337

    I. Wasserman,On the origins of galaxies, galactic angular momenta, and galactic magnetic fields., ApJ 224(1978) 337

  31. [31]

    E.-j. Kim, A. Olinto and R. Rosner,Generation of density perturbations by primordial magnetic fields, Astrophys. J.468(1996) 28 [astro-ph/9412070]

  32. [32]

    Subramanian and J.D

    K. Subramanian and J.D. Barrow, Magnetohydrodynamics in the early universe and the damping of noninear Alfven waves,Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 083502 [astro-ph/9712083]

  33. [33]

    Gopal and S.K

    R. Gopal and S.K. Sethi,Large Scale Magnetic Fields: Density Power Spectrum in Redshift Space,Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy24(2003) 51

  34. [34]

    Ralegankar, E

    P. Ralegankar, E. Garaldi and M. Viel,Matter power spectrum induced by primordial magnetic fields: from the linear to the non-linear regime,JCAP08(2025) 011 [2410.02676]

  35. [35]

    Ralegankar, M

    P. Ralegankar, M. Paviˇ cevi´ c and M. Viel,Primordial magnetic fields: consistent initial conditions and impact on high-z structures,JCAP07(2024) 027 [2402.14079]

  36. [36]

    Castellano et al.,Pushing JWST to the extremes: Search and scrutiny of bright galaxy candidates at z≃ 15–30,Astron

    M. Castellano et al.,Pushing JWST to the extremes: Search and scrutiny of bright galaxy candidates at z≃15−30,Astron. Astrophys.704(2025) A158 7 [2504.05893]

  37. [37]

    P´ erez-Gonz´ alez et al.,The Rise of the Galactic Empire: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions atz∼17and z∼25Estimated with the MIDIS+NGDEEP Ultra-deep JWST/NIRCam Data Set,Astrophys

    P.G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez et al.,The Rise of the Galactic Empire: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions atz∼17and z∼25Estimated with the MIDIS+NGDEEP Ultra-deep JWST/NIRCam Data Set,Astrophys. J.991(2025) 179 [2503.15594]

  38. [38]

    Harikane, K

    Y. Harikane, K. Nakajima, M. Ouchi, H. Umeda, Y. Isobe, Y. Ono et al.,Pure Spectroscopic Constraints on UV Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History from 25 Galaxies at z spec = 8.61-13.20 Confirmed with JWST/NIRSpec, ApJ960 (2024) 56 [2304.06658]

  39. [39]

    X. Ding, M. Onoue, J.D. Silverman, Y. Matsuoka, T. Izumi, M.A. Strauss et al.,Detection of stellar light from quasar host galaxies at redshifts above 6, Nature 621(2023) 51 [2211.14329]

  40. [40]

    Larson, S.L

    R.L. Larson, S.L. Finkelstein, D.D. Kocevski, T.A. Hutchison, J.R. Trump, P. Arrabal Haro et al.,A CEERS Discovery of an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole 570 Myr after the Big Bang: Identifying a Progenitor of Massive z ¿ 6 Quasars, ApJ953(2023) L29 [2303.08918]

  41. [41]

    JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-Line AGNs at z=4-7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH˜10ˆ6-10ˆ7 M sun and Their Host Galaxy Properties

    Y. Harikane, Y. Zhang, K. Nakajima, M. Ouchi, Y. Isobe, Y. Ono et al.,A JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-line AGNs at z = 4-7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH 106-108 M ⊙ and Their Host Galaxy Properties, ApJ959(2023) 39 [2303.11946]

  42. [42]

    Bogdan et al.,Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z≈10 X-ray quasar,Nature Astron.8(2024) 126–133, [2305.15458]

    A. Bogdan et al.,Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z≈10 X-ray quasar, Nature Astron.8(2024) 126 [2305.15458]

  43. [43]

    Maiolino et al.,JADES - The diverse population of infant black holes at 4<z<11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty,Astron

    R. Maiolino et al.,JADES - The diverse population of infant black holes at 4<z<11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty,Astron. Astrophys.691(2024) A145 [2308.01230]

  44. [44]

    Yue, A.-C

    M. Yue, A.-C. Eilers, R.A. Simcoe, R. Mackenzie, J. Matthee, D. Kashino et al.,EIGER. V. Characterizing the Host Galaxies of Luminous Quasars at z≳6, ApJ966(2024) 176 [2309.04614]

  45. [45]

    Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Iden- tification of Low-Mass, Broad-Line AGN atz >5 with CEERS

    D.D. Kocevski, M. Onoue, K. Inayoshi, J.R. Trump, P. Arrabal Haro, A. Grazian et al.,Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Identification of Low-mass, Broad-line AGNs at z ¿ 5 with CEERS, ApJ954(2023) L4 [2302.00012]

  46. [46]

    Yang et al.,A SPectroscopic Survey of Biased Halos in the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): A First Look at the Rest-frame Optical Spectra of z>6.5 Quasars Using JWST,Astrophys

    J. Yang et al.,A SPectroscopic Survey of Biased Halos in the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): A First Look at the Rest-frame Optical Spectra of z>6.5 Quasars Using JWST,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L5 [2304.09888]

  47. [47]

    Taylor, S.L

    A.J. Taylor, S.L. Finkelstein, D.D. Kocevski, J. Jeon, V. Bromm, R.O. Amor´ ın et al.,Broad-line AGNs at 3.5 ¡ z ¡ 6: The Black Hole Mass Function and a Connection with Little Red Dots, ApJ986(2025) 165 [2409.06772]

  48. [48]

    Greene, I

    J.E. Greene, I. Labbe, A.D. Goulding, L.J. Furtak, I. Chemerynska, V. Kokorev et al.,UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z ¿ 5, ApJ964 (2024) 39 [2309.05714]

  49. [49]

    Matthee et al.,Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼ 5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys,Astrophys

    J. Matthee et al.,Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys, Astrophys. J.963(2024) 129 [2306.05448]

  50. [50]

    Vanzella, F

    E. Vanzella, F. Loiacono, P. Bergamini, U. Meˇ stri´ c, M. Castellano, P. Rosati et al.,An extremely metal-poor star complex in the reionization era: Approaching Population III stars with JWST, A&A678(2023) A173 [2305.14413]

  51. [51]

    Visbal, R

    E. Visbal, R. Hazlett and G.L. Bryan,LAP1-B is the First Observed System Consistent with Theoretical Predictions for Population III Stars,Astrophys. J. Lett. 993(2025) L17 [2508.03842]

  52. [52]

    Mu˜ noz, J

    J.B. Mu˜ noz, J. Mirocha, J. Chisholm, S.R. Furlanetto and C. Mason,Reionization after JWST: a photon budget crisis?,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.535(2024) L37 [2404.07250]

  53. [53]

    Austin et al.,Resolving the ionizing photon budget crisis with JWST/NIRCam HII clumping constraints at z=6,2512.10839

    D. Austin et al.,Resolving the ionizing photon budget crisis with JWST/NIRCam HII clumping constraints at z=6,2512.10839

  54. [54]

    Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov,Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.21(2013) 62 [1303.7121]

  55. [55]

    Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function

    D.J. Eisenstein and W. Hu,Baryonic features in the matter transfer function,Astrophys. J.496(1998) 605 [astro-ph/9709112]. [56]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A13 [1502.01589]

  56. [56]

    Reionization, UV Luminosity and 21$\,$cm Sensitivity to Primordial Magnetic Fields: Impact of Energy Losses

    G. Facchinetti, A. Korochkin, L. Lopez-Honorez and J. Schwagereit,Reionization, UV Luminosity and 21 cm Sensitivity to Primordial Magnetic Fields: Impact of Energy Losses,2604.22703

  57. [57]

    Relative velocity of dark matter and baryonic fluids and the formation of the first structures

    D. Tseliakhovich and C. Hirata,Relative velocity of dark matter and baryonic fluids and the formation of the first structures,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 083520 [1005.2416]

  58. [58]

    J.R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou and N. Kaiser, Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations,Astrophys. J.379(1991) 440

  59. [59]

    Sheth, H.J

    R.K. Sheth, H.J. Mo and G. Tormen,Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.323(2001) 1 [astro-ph/9907024]

  60. [60]

    Sheth and G

    R.K. Sheth and G. Tormen,An Excursion Set Model of Hierarchical Clustering : Ellipsoidal Collapse and the Moving Barrier,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.329 (2002) 61 [astro-ph/0105113]

  61. [61]

    Sethi and K

    S.K. Sethi and K. Subramanian,Primordial magnetic fields in the post-recombination era and early reionization,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.356(2005) 778 [astro-ph/0405413]

  62. [62]

    Schleicher, D

    D.R.G. Schleicher, D. Galli, S.C.O. Glover, R. Banerjee, F. Palla, R. Schneider et al.,The influence of magnetic fields on the thermodynamics of primordial star formation,Astrophys. J.703(2009) 1096 [0904.3970]

  63. [63]

    Urrutia, J

    J. Urrutia, J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn and V. Vaskonen, Starlight from JWST: Implications for star formation and dark matter models,Astron. Astrophys.702(2025) A109 [2504.20043]

  64. [64]

    Barkana and A

    R. Barkana and A. Loeb,In the beginning: The First sources of light and the reionization of the Universe, Phys. Rept.349(2001) 125 [astro-ph/0010468]

  65. [65]

    Bouwens, P.A

    R.J. Bouwens, P.A. Oesch, M. Stefanon, G. Illingworth, I. Labb´ e, N. Reddy et al.,New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant Star Formation Efficiency, AJ162(2021) 47 [2102.07775]

  66. [66]

    Harikane, Y

    Y. Harikane, Y. Ono, M. Ouchi, C. Liu, M. Sawicki, T. Shibuya et al.,GOLDRUSH. IV. Luminosity Functions and Clustering Revealed with 4,000,000 8 Galaxies at z 2-7: Galaxy-AGN Transition, Star Formation Efficiency, and Implication for Evolution at z ¿ 10, ApJS259(2022) 20 [2108.01090]

  67. [67]

    Donnan, R.J

    C.T. Donnan, R.J. McLure, J.S. Dunlop, D.J. McLeod, D. Magee, K.Z. Arellano-C´ ordova et al.,JWST PRIMER: a new multifield determination of the evolving galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z≃9−15, MNRAS533(2024) 3222 [2403.03171]

  68. [68]

    P., Oesch, P

    R.P. Naidu et al.,A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy atz spec = 14.44Confirmed with JWST,2505.11263

  69. [69]

    Madau, F

    P. Madau, F. Haardt and M.J. Rees,Radiative Transfer in a Clumpy Universe. III. The Nature of Cosmological Ionizing Sources, ApJ514(1999) 648 [astro-ph/9809058]

  70. [70]

    Shull, A

    J.M. Shull, A. Harness, M. Trenti and B.D. Smith, Critical Star Formation Rates for Reionization: Full Reionization Occurs at Redshift z≈7, ApJ747(2012) 100

  71. [71]

    Llerena, L

    M. Llerena, L. Pentericci, L. Napolitano, S. Mascia, R. Amor´ ın, A. Calabr` o et al.,The ionizing photon production efficiency of star-forming galaxies at z∼ 4–10, A&A698(2025) A302 [2412.01358]

  72. [72]

    Papovich et al.,Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization Are All Bark and No Bite – Plenty of Ionizing Photons, Low Escape Fractions,2505.08870

    C. Papovich et al.,Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization Are All Bark and No Bite – Plenty of Ionizing Photons, Low Escape Fractions,2505.08870

  73. [73]

    Giovinazzo, P.A

    E. Giovinazzo, P.A. Oesch, A. Weibel, R.A. Meyer, C. Witten, A. Bhagwat et al.,Breaking Through the Cosmic Fog: JWST/NIRSpec Constraints on Ionizing Photon Escape in Reionization-Era Galaxies,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2507.01096 [2507.01096]

  74. [74]

    Kageura, M

    Y. Kageura, M. Ouchi, M. Nakane, H. Umeda, Y. Harikane, S. Yoshiura et al.,Census of LyαEmission from∼600 Galaxies at z = 5–14: Evolution of the Lyα Luminosity Function and a Late Sharp Cosmic Reionization, ApJS278(2025) 33 [2501.05834]

  75. [75]

    Umeda, M

    H. Umeda, M. Ouchi, Y. Kageura, Y. Harikane, M. Nakane, T.T. Thai et al.,Probing the Cosmic Reionization History with JWST: Gunn-Peterson and LyαDamping Wing Absorption at4.5< z <13,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.04683 [2504.04683]

  76. [76]

    Nakane, M

    M. Nakane, M. Ouchi, K. Nakajima, Y. Harikane, Y. Ono, H. Umeda et al.,LyαEmission at z = 7–13: Clear Evolution of LyαEquivalent Width Indicating a Late Cosmic Reionization History, ApJ967(2024) 28 [2312.06804]

  77. [77]

    Greig et al.,IGM damping wing constraints on the tail end of reionization from the enlarged XQR-30 sample,Mon

    B. Greig et al.,IGM damping wing constraints on the tail end of reionization from the enlarged XQR-30 sample,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.530(2024) 3208 [2404.12585]

  78. [78]

    Bruton, Y.-H

    S. Bruton, Y.-H. Lin, C. Scarlata and M.J. Hayes,The Universe is at Most 88% Neutral at z = 10.6, ApJ949 (2023) L40 [2303.03419]

  79. [79]

    Mason, T

    C.A. Mason, T. Treu, M. Dijkstra, A. Mesinger, M. Trenti, L. Pentericci et al.,The Universe Is Reionizing at z∼7: Bayesian Inference of the IGM Neutral Fraction Using LyαEmission from Galaxies, Astrophys. J.856(2018) 2 [1709.05356]

  80. [80]

    Whitler, C.A

    L.R. Whitler, C.A. Mason, K. Ren, M. Dijkstra, A. Mesinger, L. Pentericci et al.,The impact of scatter in the galaxy UV luminosity to halo mass relation on Ly αvisibility during the epoch of reionization, MNRAS 495(2020) 3602 [1911.03499]

Showing first 80 references.