arxiv: 2604.25467 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 💻 cs.LG · math.OC

Recognition: unknown

Subspace Optimization for Efficient Federated Learning under Heterogeneous Data

Shuchen Zhu , Zhengyang Huang , Yuqi Xu , Peijin Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG math.OC

keywords federated learningsubspace optimizationheterogeneous datanon-IIDconvergence analysiscommunication efficiencymemory efficiency

0 comments

The pith

Subspace optimization corrects heterogeneity in federated learning by projecting to low dimensions and backfilling residuals, achieving a rate of order O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces SSF, a method that performs heterogeneity-corrected optimization in a low-dimensional subspace using projected quantities. It uses a backfill-style update to retain residual components when the subspace changes, preserving full-dimensional control. Under standard assumptions, this yields a non-asymptotic convergence rate of order ~O(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)). Experiments demonstrate improved accuracy-efficiency trade-offs with heterogeneous client data compared to methods like SCAFFOLD that have higher overhead.

Core claim

SSF performs heterogeneity-corrected optimization in a low-dimensional subspace using only projected quantities, while preserving full-dimensional control information through a backfill-style update that retains residual components whenever the active subspace changes. Under standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions, SSF attains a non-asymptotic rate of order O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)).

What carries the argument

Low-dimensional subspace projection for corrected optimization combined with backfill-style updates to retain residuals.

If this is right

Reduces communication, memory, and computation overhead in large-model federated learning.
Maintains stability and performance despite non-IID client data inducing drift.
Provides a convergence guarantee of order ~O(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)) under standard assumptions.
Shows favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-offs in experiments under heterogeneous data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The subspace approach could be adapted to other distributed learning paradigms facing similar heterogeneity issues.
Choosing the subspace dimension dynamically based on observed heterogeneity might further optimize performance.
Combining SSF with existing variance reduction techniques could yield even tighter bounds or better practical results.
Testing the method on very large-scale models with extreme non-IID distributions would validate its scalability.

Load-bearing premise

Standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions hold for the federated setting with heterogeneous data even after subspace projection.

What would settle it

Observing a slower convergence rate than O(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)) or degraded performance in experiments with high data heterogeneity where subspace projection fails to capture the necessary corrections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25467 by Peijin Li, Shuchen Zhu, Yuqi Xu, Zhengyang Huang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Relative error versus communication rounds for view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Effect of the subspace dimension on convergence at high heterogeneity ( view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Convergence behaviour at medium heterogeneity ( view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Test accuracy versus training epoch on CIFAR-100 with ResNet-110. Full-SCAFFOLD is the view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Federated learning increasingly operates in a large-model regime where communication, memory, and computation are all scarce. Typically, non-IID client data induce drift that degrades the stability and performance of local training. Existing remedies such as SCAFFOLD introduce heterogeneity-correction mechanisms to address this challenge, but they incur substantial extra communication and memory overhead. This paper proposes a subspace optimization method for federated learning (SSF), which performs heterogeneity-corrected optimization in a low-dimensional subspace using only projected quantities, while preserving full-dimensional control information through a backfill-style update that retains residual components whenever the active subspace changes. Under standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions, SSF attains a non-asymptotic rate of order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/T+1/\sqrt{NKT})$. Experiments show favorable accuracy--efficiency trade-offs under heterogeneous data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SSF's subspace projection plus backfill update is the actual new piece for cutting FL communication overhead under heterogeneity while keeping the usual rate, but the savings hinge on details not visible in the abstract.

read the letter

The core contribution is the SSF method that runs the heterogeneity correction only on projected quantities in a low-dimensional subspace and then applies a backfill step to carry over the residual components when the subspace changes. This is presented as a way to avoid the full extra communication and memory that SCAFFOLD-style corrections require, while still delivering the standard non-asymptotic rate of order O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)) under smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions. That combination looks like the genuinely new element relative to the cited prior work. The paper does a clean job of stating the practical motivation for large-model federated settings where every bit of overhead matters, and the rate claim follows the usual FL analysis path without obvious circularity or invented assumptions. Experiments are reported to show better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs on heterogeneous data, which is the right kind of evidence to include. The soft spots are mostly around missing specifics. How the subspace is chosen and how often it changes is not spelled out here, so it is unclear whether the backfill step introduces hidden computation or communication that eats into the claimed savings. The projection could also discard useful information in some heterogeneity patterns, and without the full experimental setup or error analysis it is hard to judge how robust the gains are. The proof sketch is standard, but any gap in handling the projection error would affect the whole argument. This is the kind of paper that would interest people working on practical federated systems for big models on non-IID client data. A reader who already knows the SCAFFOLD literature would get the most out of it and could test the idea quickly. I would send it to peer review because the idea is focused, the rate is grounded in standard assumptions, and the efficiency angle is worth checking in detail even if revisions are needed for the implementation and experiments.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Subspace Optimization for Federated Learning (SSF), which performs heterogeneity-corrected optimization in a low-dimensional subspace using only projected quantities, combined with a backfill-style update to retain residual full-dimensional components when the subspace changes. Under standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions, it claims a non-asymptotic convergence rate of order O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)), with experiments demonstrating favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-offs under heterogeneous (non-IID) client data.

Significance. If the claimed rate is rigorously established without hidden error terms from the subspace projection and the backfill mechanism preserves the assumptions, this could provide a meaningful efficiency improvement for large-model federated learning by lowering communication and memory costs relative to full-dimensional correctors such as SCAFFOLD while retaining comparable convergence behavior.

major comments (2)

[§4, Theorem 1] §4 (Convergence Analysis), Theorem 1: The non-asymptotic rate is asserted to follow from standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions, but the proof must explicitly bound any additional error introduced by the subspace projection operator and the backfill residual update; without this, it is unclear whether the rate remains O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)) or acquires extra factors dependent on the subspace dimension.
[§5, Table 2] §5 (Experiments), Table 2 and Figure 3: The reported accuracy-efficiency trade-offs under heterogeneous data are promising, but the choice of subspace dimension is not ablated against the theoretical parameters N, K, T; this leaves open whether the observed gains are consistent with the claimed rate or depend on problem-specific tuning.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and §2: The notation for the rate uses both O~ and mathcal{O}; standardize to a single form and ensure N (clients), K (local steps), T (rounds) are defined before first use.
[§3.2] §3.2 (Backfill Update): The description of retaining residual components is informal; a precise algorithmic statement or pseudocode would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the careful review and constructive suggestions. Below we respond to each major comment and describe the changes we will implement in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §4 (Convergence Analysis), Theorem 1: The non-asymptotic rate is asserted to follow from standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions, but the proof must explicitly bound any additional error introduced by the subspace projection operator and the backfill residual update; without this, it is unclear whether the rate remains O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)) or acquires extra factors dependent on the subspace dimension.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the convergence proof in Theorem 1 relies on controlling the errors from the projection and backfill steps. In our analysis, these errors are bounded using the fact that the subspace is chosen to capture the dominant directions of heterogeneity, and the backfill update ensures that the residual is handled in subsequent iterations without accumulating extra terms. To address the concern directly, we will revise the proof to include an additional lemma that explicitly quantifies the projection error and shows that it contributes only to lower-order terms within thewidetilde{O} notation, preserving the stated rate. This revision will be made in the updated Section 4. revision: yes
Referee: §5 (Experiments), Table 2 and Figure 3: The reported accuracy-efficiency trade-offs under heterogeneous data are promising, but the choice of subspace dimension is not ablated against the theoretical parameters N, K, T; this leaves open whether the observed gains are consistent with the claimed rate or depend on problem-specific tuning.

Authors: We agree that a more thorough ablation would help connect the empirical results to the theory. The current experiments fix the subspace dimension based on the model size and dataset characteristics to demonstrate practical gains. In the revision, we will include an extended experimental section with ablations varying the subspace dimension for different combinations of N (clients), K (local steps), and T (rounds), and analyze how the performance scales in line with the O(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)) rate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The claimed non-asymptotic convergence rate is presented as following directly from standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions applied to the SSF subspace method with backfill updates. No equations or steps in the abstract reduce the rate to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the subspace projection is described as preserving the standard rate while lowering overhead. The derivation chain remains self-contained and externally falsifiable under the stated assumptions, with no load-bearing self-referential elements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central theoretical claim depends on standard optimization assumptions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption standard smoothness and bounded-variance assumptions
Invoked to establish the non-asymptotic convergence rate of order O~(1/T + 1/sqrt(NKT)).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5440 in / 1319 out tokens · 53161 ms · 2026-05-07T16:41:07.141698+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

QSGD: Communication-efficient SGD via gradient quantization and encoding,

Dan Alistarh, Demjan Grubic, Jerry Li, Ryota Tomioka, and Milan Vojnovic. QSGD: Communication- efficient SGD via gradient quantization and encoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02132v4, 2016

work page arXiv 2016
[2]

Fast composite optimization and statistical recovery in federated learning

Yajie Bao, Michael Crawshaw, Shan Luo, and Mingrui Liu. Fast composite optimization and statistical recovery in federated learning. InProceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2022

2022
[3]

Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with quantization, sparsification, and local computations.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 2019

Debraj Basu, Deepesh Data, Can Karakus, and Suhas Diggavi. Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with quantization, sparsification, and local computations.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 2019

2019
[4]

Beyond local sharp- ness: Communication-efficient global sharpness-aware minimization for federated learning

Debora Caldarola, Pietro Cagnasso, Barbara Caputo, and Marco Ciccone. Beyond local sharp- ness: Communication-efficient global sharpness-aware minimization for federated learning. 2024. arXiv:2412.03752v2

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

Greedy low-rank gradient compression for distributed learning with convergence guarantees,

Chuyan Chen, Yutong He, Pengrui Li, Weichen Jia, and Kun Yuan. Greedy low-rank gradient compression for distributed learning with convergence guarantees.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08784v4, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Momentum provably improves error feedback! InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

Ilyas Fatkhullin, Alexander Tyurin, and Peter Richt´ arik. Momentum provably improves error feedback! InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

2023
[7]

Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning with communication compression

Xinmeng Huang, Ping Li, and Xiaoyun Li. Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning with communication compression. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. 31

2023
[8]

Widening the network mitigates the impact of data heterogeneity on FedAvg

Like Jian and Dong Liu. Widening the network mitigates the impact of data heterogeneity on FedAvg. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

2025
[9]

and Stich, Sebastian U

Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi, Sebastian U. Stich, and Ananda Theertha Suresh. SCAFFOLD: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.06378, 2020

work page arXiv 1910
[10]

Anastasia Koloskova, Tao Lin, and Sebastian U. Stich. An improved analysis of gradient tracking for decentralized machine learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 11452–11465, 2021

2021
[11]

Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency

Jakub Koneˇ cn´ y, H. Brendan McMahan, Felix X. Yu, Peter Richt´ arik, Ananda Theertha Suresh, and Dave Bacon. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency.arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492v2, 2016

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[12]

On the convergence of FedAvg on non-IID data

Xiang Li, Kaixuan Huang, Wenhao Yang, Shusen Wang, and Zhihua Zhang. On the convergence of FedAvg on non-IID data. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2020

2020
[13]

Yujun Lin, Song Han, Huizi Mao, Yu Wang, and William J. Dally. Deep gradient compression: Reducing the communication bandwidth for distributed training. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2017

2017
[14]

Fedmuon: Accelerating federated learning with matrix orthogonalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.27403v1, 2025

Junkang Liu, Fanhua Shang, Junchao Zhou, Hongying Liu, Yuanyuan Liu, and Jin Liu. Fedmuon: Accelerating federated learning with matrix orthogonalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.27403v1, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Yue Liu, Tao Lin, Anastasia Koloskova, and Sebastian U. Stich. Decentralized gradient tracking with local steps.Optimization Methods and Software, 2023

2023
[16]

Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Ag”uera y Arcas

H. Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Ag”uera y Arcas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. InProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1273–1282, 2017

2017
[17]

A unified linear speedup analysis of federated averaging and nesterov fedavg.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 76:1345– 1386, 2023

Zhaonan Qu, Kaixiang Lin, Zhaojian Li, Jiayu Zhou, and Zhengyuan Zhou. A unified linear speedup analysis of federated averaging and nesterov fedavg.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 76:1345– 1386, 2023

2023
[18]

ZeRO: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models

Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. ZeRO: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. InInternational Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2019

2019
[19]

Reasflow: Assisting reasoning-centric scientific discovery in applied mathematics via a knowledge-based multi-agent system, 2026

ReasFlow Team. Reasflow: Assisting reasoning-centric scientific discovery in applied mathematics via a knowledge-based multi-agent system, 2026

2026
[20]

Ldadam: Adaptive optimiza- tion from low-dimensional gradient statistics

Thomas Robert, Mher Safaryan, Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, and Dan Alistarh. Ldadam: Adaptive optimiza- tion from low-dimensional gradient statistics. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[21]

Sebastian U. Stich. Local SGD converges fast and communicates little. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2019

2019
[22]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05350 , author =

Sebastian U. Stich and Sai Praneeth Karimireddy. The error-feedback framework: Better rates for SGD with delayed gradients and compressed communication.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05350v2, 2019

work page arXiv 1909
[23]

Doublesqueeze: Parallel stochastic gradient descent with double-pass error-compensated compression

Hanlin Tang, Xiangru Lian, Chen Yu, Tong Zhang, and Ji Liu. Doublesqueeze: Parallel stochastic gradient descent with double-pass error-compensated compression. InProceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019

2019
[24]

Gravac: Adaptive compression for communication-efficient distributed dl training

Sahil Tyagi and Martin Swany. Gravac: Adaptive compression for communication-efficient distributed dl training. InIEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2023. 32

2023
[25]

Gradient sparsification for communication-efficient distributed optimization

Jianqiao Wangni, Jialei Wang, Ji Liu, and Tong Zhang. Gradient sparsification for communication-efficient distributed optimization. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017

2017
[26]

Towards bias correction of FedAvg over nonuniform and time-varying communications

Ming Xiang, Stratis Ioannidis, Edmund Yeh, Carlee Joe-Wong, and Lili Su. Towards bias correction of FedAvg over nonuniform and time-varying communications. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 5815–5822, 2023

2023
[27]

Achieving linear speedup with partial worker participation in non-IID federated learning

Haibo Yang, Minghong Fang, and Jia Liu. Achieving linear speedup with partial worker participation in non-IID federated learning. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

2021
[28]

Heterogeneous federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.06767, 2020

Fuxun Yu, Weishan Zhang, Zhuwei Qin, Zirui Xu, Di Wang, Chenchen Liu, Zhi Tian, and Xiang Chen. Heterogeneous federated learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.06767, 2020

work page arXiv 2008
[29]

Federated accelerated stochastic gradient descent

Honglin Yuan and Tengyu Ma. Federated accelerated stochastic gradient descent. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020

2020
[30]

Non-convex composite federated learning with heterogeneous data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03958v1, 2025

Jiaojiao Zhang, Jiang Hu, and Mikael Johansson. Non-convex composite federated learning with heterogeneous data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03958v1, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

An efficient subspace algorithm for federated learning on heterogeneous data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05213v1, 2025

Jiaojiao Zhang, Yuqi Xu, and Kun Yuan. An efficient subspace algorithm for federated learning on heterogeneous data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05213v1, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models

Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, Todor Mihaylov, Myle Ott, Sam Shleifer, Kurt Shuster, Daniel Simig, Punit Singh Koura, Anjali Sridhar, Tianlu Wang, and Luke Zettlemoyer. OPT: Open pre-trained transformer language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068v4, 2022

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[33]

GaLore: Memory-efficient LLM training by gradient low-rank projection

Jiawei Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Beidi Chen, Zhangyang Wang, Anima Anandkumar, and Yuandong Tian. GaLore: Memory-efficient LLM training by gradient low-rank projection. InProceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

2024
[34]

FedCanon: Non-convex composite federated learning with efficient proximal operation on heterogeneous data.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2025

Yuan Zhou, Jiachen Zhong, Xinli Shi, Guanghui Wen, and Xinghuo Yu. FedCanon: Non-convex composite federated learning with efficient proximal operation on heterogeneous data.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2025. 33

2025