pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25575 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.supr-con

Topochemical Fluorination of La₂NiO_(4+δ) Single Crystals

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con
keywords topochemical fluorinationRuddlesden-Popper phaseLa2NiO4single crystalssuperstructurefluorine intercalationantiferromagnetic ordering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluorination of La2NiO4 single crystals preserves the layered framework while inserting fluorine to form a new superstructure and shift magnetic order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether low-temperature chemical reactions can add fluorine to bulk single crystals of lanthanum nickel oxide without breaking the material apart. It compares several fluorinating agents and reaction paths to track how much fluorine enters the crystal and what structural and magnetic changes result. X-ray diffraction shows the basic layered arrangement survives, but the spacing between layers adjusts and a new repeating pattern appears inside the crystal. Magnetic measurements find the temperature at which spins order antiferromagnetically has moved. These observations matter because single-crystal data can separate bulk behavior from surface effects that powders and films mix together.

Core claim

Topochemical fluorination of La2NiO4+δ single crystals proceeds without destroying the Ruddlesden-Popper framework. It produces lattice parameter shifts consistent with anion intercalation throughout the bulk and ion exchange limited to the surface. The process generates a previously unreported superstructure and alters the antiferromagnetic ordering seen in magnetic susceptibility.

What carries the argument

Topochemical fluorination reactions that use polymer agents such as PTFE or PVDF to drive controlled fluorine insertion into the Ruddlesden-Popper layers of a single crystal.

If this is right

  • The Ruddlesden-Popper layers remain intact after low-temperature fluorination.
  • Lattice parameters expand in a manner expected for anion insertion into the bulk.
  • A new superstructure forms that reflects ordered anion placement not seen in earlier nickelate studies.
  • Antiferromagnetic ordering temperature changes after the fluorination treatment.
  • Surface fluorine content is high while bulk incorporation shows lower homogeneity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same single-crystal approach could separate surface and bulk contributions in other anion-insertion reactions on layered oxides.
  • The newly observed superstructure offers a concrete pattern against which models of stage ordering in nickelates can be tested.
  • Magnetic changes measured on crystals may help isolate whether the ordering shift arises from bulk fluorine or from the modified surface layer.

Load-bearing premise

The observed lattice expansion, new superstructure, and magnetic shift are produced by fluorine atoms that have entered the crystal lattice rather than by surface-only reactions or defects created during the process.

What would settle it

A bulk-sensitive measurement such as neutron diffraction or fluorine-specific spectroscopy on the interior of a treated crystal that finds no incorporated fluorine and no superstructure would show the structural changes are not caused by fluorine intercalation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25575 by Hasan Yilmaz, Masahiko Isobe, Oliver Clemens, Pascal Puphal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Prepared glass reactors after fluorination process with view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topochemical fluorination offers a low--temperature route for modifying the anion chemistry and electronic ground states of layered transition-metal oxides, providing access to metastable phases and functionalities that are not able to be achieved through conventional solid--state synthesis. Despite extensive work on polycrystalline samples and thin films, topochemical fluorination of bulk single crystals has not been studied, limiting insights into intrinsic structure property relationships. Here, we investigate the topochemical fluorination of optical float zone grown (OFZ) La$_2$NiO$_{4+\delta}$ single crystals using polymer-based PTFE, PVDF and inorganic CuF$_{2}$ fluorination agents and compare it to our topochemical pathways of reduction of LaNiO$_{3-x}$. By systematically investigating direct and indirect contact reaction pathways, we can understand fluorination mechanisms, quantify the degree of fluorine incorporation, and evaluate the resulting structural and magnetic modifications in a detail that was not possible in powder and thin films. Powder and single--crystal X-ray diffraction reveal that fluorination proceeds without destroying the Ruddlesden--Popper framework, while inducing lattice parameter changes consistent with anion intercalation in the bulk and ion exchange on the surface. This even induces a clear superstructure, which was not reported before and extends the understanding of anion insertion reactions beyond what is known on stage ordering in nickelates. Energy-dispersive X--ray spectroscopy confirms strong fluorine incorporation on the surface and reduced homogeneity in the bulk. Magnetic susceptibility measurements demonstrate a change in antiferromagnetic ordering upon fluorination.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports topochemical fluorination of La₂NiO₄₊δ single crystals grown by optical float zone using PTFE, PVDF, and CuF₂ agents (with comparison to reduction of LaNiO₃₋ₓ). Powder and single-crystal XRD show preservation of the Ruddlesden-Popper framework with lattice-parameter shifts attributed to bulk anion intercalation and surface ion exchange; a previously unreported superstructure is observed. EDX indicates strong surface fluorine with reduced bulk homogeneity. Magnetic susceptibility measurements show altered antiferromagnetic ordering.

Significance. If the central attribution of lattice changes and the new superstructure to bulk fluorine intercalation holds, the work would be significant as the first detailed study of topochemical fluorination on bulk single crystals of a Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate. This enables intrinsic (rather than powder-averaged) structure-property insights and extends anion-insertion chemistry by revealing a superstructure not previously reported in nickelates, potentially informing stage-ordering mechanisms.

major comments (2)
  1. [XRD and EDX results paragraphs] The central claim that fluorination induces bulk anion intercalation (distinct from surface exchange) rests on XRD lattice-parameter shifts being 'consistent with' intercalation. However, the EDX section reports only 'strong fluorine incorporation on the surface and reduced homogeneity in the bulk' without quantitative bulk F occupancy refinement, integrated intensity analysis, or complementary bulk-sensitive quantification (e.g., neutron diffraction or chemical titration). This leaves open alternative explanations such as oxygen-vacancy redistribution or defect ordering, directly weakening the bulk-intercalation interpretation.
  2. [Magnetic susceptibility measurements] Magnetic susceptibility data are presented as demonstrating a change in antiferromagnetic ordering, yet the noted reduced bulk homogeneity (from EDX) is not quantitatively linked to the susceptibility curves. Without error bars, multiple-crystal statistics, or a clear mapping of F distribution to the magnetic transition temperature, it is unclear whether the observed shift reflects intrinsic bulk fluorination or sample inhomogeneity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'not able to be achieved' is awkward; rephrase to 'unachievable' or 'inaccessible'.
  2. [XRD discussion] The phrase 'This even induces a clear superstructure' is grammatically unclear; specify whether the superstructure is observed in all fluorinated crystals or only under specific conditions.
  3. [Throughout] No tables or figures are referenced in the provided text for quantitative lattice parameters, F concentrations, or susceptibility fits; adding these would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript on topochemical fluorination of La₂NiO₄₊δ single crystals. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest responses based on the data presented. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional details where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [XRD and EDX results paragraphs] The central claim that fluorination induces bulk anion intercalation (distinct from surface exchange) rests on XRD lattice-parameter shifts being 'consistent with' intercalation. However, the EDX section reports only 'strong fluorine incorporation on the surface and reduced homogeneity in the bulk' without quantitative bulk F occupancy refinement, integrated intensity analysis, or complementary bulk-sensitive quantification (e.g., neutron diffraction or chemical titration). This leaves open alternative explanations such as oxygen-vacancy redistribution or defect ordering, directly weakening the bulk-intercalation interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that EDX is surface-sensitive and does not yield quantitative bulk fluorine occupancies or refinements from integrated intensities. Our interpretation of bulk intercalation relies on the observed lattice-parameter expansions in both powder and single-crystal XRD, which match the magnitude and direction expected for interstitial anion insertion in the Ruddlesden-Popper rock-salt layers, as established in prior powder fluorination studies. The appearance of a new superstructure in the single-crystal diffraction data further supports a bulk structural modification, as surface-only effects would not produce such long-range ordering throughout the crystal volume. We agree that alternatives such as oxygen-vacancy redistribution cannot be entirely excluded on the basis of the current dataset alone. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit language noting these limitations, clarified that the lattice shifts are 'consistent with' rather than definitive proof of bulk intercalation, and suggested neutron diffraction or chemical analysis as desirable future bulk-sensitive probes. No new data are added, but the discussion is expanded to present the evidence more cautiously. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Magnetic susceptibility measurements] Magnetic susceptibility data are presented as demonstrating a change in antiferromagnetic ordering, yet the noted reduced bulk homogeneity (from EDX) is not quantitatively linked to the susceptibility curves. Without error bars, multiple-crystal statistics, or a clear mapping of F distribution to the magnetic transition temperature, it is unclear whether the observed shift reflects intrinsic bulk fluorination or sample inhomogeneity.

    Authors: The susceptibility measurements were performed on several independently fluorinated crystals, and the shift in the antiferromagnetic transition temperature is reproducible. In the revised version we have added error bars to the data points and included a brief statement on the number of crystals examined. While the EDX-indicated bulk inhomogeneity may contribute to transition broadening, the systematic displacement of the ordering temperature correlates with the fluorination treatment rather than random scatter. We concede that a direct, quantitative mapping between local fluorine distribution and the magnetic response would require spatially resolved probes (e.g., micro-XRD or μSR) that lie outside the present study. The revised text now states that the magnetic changes are interpreted as an average effect of the fluorination while acknowledging the possible role of inhomogeneity; we do not claim a one-to-one correspondence. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental reporting

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct experimental observations from powder and single-crystal XRD, EDX, and magnetic susceptibility on fluorinated La2NiO4+δ crystals. No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the provided text. The comparison to prior reduction pathways on LaNiO3-x is contextual background and does not serve as a load-bearing premise for the structural or magnetic claims, which rest on external benchmarks rather than self-referential reduction. The paper is therefore self-contained against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of X-ray diffraction indexing and magnetic susceptibility interpretation for Ruddlesden-Popper phases. No free parameters are fitted, no new entities are postulated, and no ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond routine materials characterization.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Ruddlesden-Popper framework remains intact under topochemical fluorination
    Invoked when stating lattice changes occur without framework destruction
  • domain assumption Lattice parameter shifts indicate anion intercalation versus ion exchange
    Used to interpret XRD results as bulk versus surface processes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1419 out tokens · 72089 ms · 2026-05-07T14:49:28.033142+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Before synthesis, La2O3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.9%) was dried at 1100°C for 12 h, while NiO (Alfa Aesar, 99.0%) was dried at 700°C for 6 h

    Crystal Growth La2NiO4+δ single crystals were synthesized using the Optical Float Zone (OFZ) method. Before synthesis, La2O3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.9%) was dried at 1100°C for 12 h, while NiO (Alfa Aesar, 99.0%) was dried at 700°C for 6 h. The stoichiometric mixtures of La 2O3 and NiO were ball-milled at 300 rpm for 6 h and then sintered twice in air at 1200°C f...

  2. [2]

    Topochemical Fluorination of La 2NiO4+δ Topochemical fluorination of La 2NiO4+δ single crys- tals was carried out using different fluorination agents. Polymer-based PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene, (C2F4)n, Sigma-Aldrich) and PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride, (C2H2F2)n, Sigma-Aldrich), as well as the inorganic fluorination agent CuF 2 (copper(II) fluoride dihy...

  3. [3]

    C. Yang, R. A. Ortiz, H. Wang, W. Sigle, K. Anggara, E. Benckiser, B. Keimer, and P. A. van Aken, Atomic- scale observation of geometric reconstruction in a fluorine-intercalated infinite layer nickelate superlattice, Nature Communications16, 10.1038/s41467-025-58646- 0 (2025)

  4. [4]

    Zhang, M

    R. Zhang, M. S. Senn, and M. A. Hayward, Directed lifting of inversion symmetry in ruddlesden–popper oxide–fluorides: Toward ferroelectric and multiferroic be- havior, Chemistry of Materials28, 8399 (2016)

  5. [5]

    Herlihy, W.-T

    A. Herlihy, W.-T. Chen, C. Ritter, Y.-C. Chuang, and M. S. Senn, Interplay between jahn–teller distortions and structural phase transitions in ruddlesden–poppers, Jour- nal of the American Chemical Society147, 7209 (2025), pMID: 39964199, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c00459

  6. [6]

    Flathmann, T

    C. Flathmann, T. Meyer, U. Ross, A. Dehning, C. Jooss, and M. Seibt, Relationship between structure and charge/orbital order in epitaxial single layer ruddlesden- popper manganite thin films, APL Materials12, 061112 (2024)

  7. [7]

    P. V. Balachandran, D. Puggioni, and J. M. Rondinelli, Crystal-chemistry guidelines for noncentrosymmetric A2BO4 ruddlesden–popper oxides, Inorganic Chemistry 53, 336 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1021/ic402283c

  8. [8]

    Vanita, A

    V. Vanita, A. I. Waidha, S. Vasala, P. Puphal, R. Schoch, P. Glatzel, M. Bauer, and O. Clemens, In- sights into the first multi-transition-metal containing ruddlesden–popper-type cathode for all-solid-state fluo- ride ion batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A12, 8769 (2024)

  9. [9]

    Vanita, R

    V. Vanita, R. Schoch, P. Puphal, H. Yilmaz, M. Bauer, and O. Clemens, Structural and electrochemical be- haviour of bilayer manganite LaSr 2Mn2O6.96 cathode for all-solid-state fluoride ion batteries, Acta Physico- Chimica Sinica , 100181 (2025)

  10. [10]

    Yilmaz, P

    H. Yilmaz, P. Sosa-Lizama, M. Knauft, K. K¨ uster, U. Starke, M. Isobe, O. Clemens, P. A. van Aken, Y. E. Suyolcu, and P. Puphal, Floating zone growth of large tetragonal ruddlesden–popper bilayer nickelate YySr3−yNi2−xAlxO7−δ single crystals, Communications Physics8, 408 (2025)

  11. [11]

    Wissel, T

    K. Wissel, T. Vogel, S. Dasgupta, A. D. Fortes, P. R. Slater, and O. Clemens, Topochemical fluori- nation ofn= 2 ruddlesden–popper type Sr 3Ti2O7 to Sr 3Ti2O5F4 and its reductive defluorination, Inor- ganic Chemistry59, 1153 (2020), pMID: 31880431, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02783

  12. [12]

    Wissel, J

    K. Wissel, J. Heldt, P. B. Groszewicz, S. Dasgupta, H. Breitzke, M. Donzelli, A. I. Waidha, A. D. Fortes, J. Rohrer, P. R. Slater, G. Buntkowsky, and O. Clemens, Topochemical fluorination of La2NiO4+δ: Unprecedented ordering of oxide and fluoride ions in La 2NiO3F2, Inor- ganic Chemistry57, 6549 (2018), pMID: 29749739

  13. [13]

    Puphal, B

    P. Puphal, B. Wehinger, J. Nuss, K. K¨ uster, U. Starke, G. Garbarino, B. Keimer, M. Isobe, and M. Hepting, Syn- thesis and physical properties of LaNiO 2 crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 014804 (2023)

  14. [14]

    Puphal, T

    P. Puphal, T. Sch¨ afer, B. Keimer, and M. Hepting, Su- perconductivity in infinite-layer and ruddlesden–popper nickelates, Nature Reviews Physics 10.1038/s42254-025- 00898-2 (2025)

  15. [15]

    Peterson, M

    C. Peterson, M. W. Swift, Z. Porter, R. J. Cl´ ement, G. Wu, G. H. Ahn, S. J. Moon, B. C. Chakoumakos, J. P. C. Ruff, H. Cao, C. Van de Walle, and S. D. Wil- son, Sr3Ir2O7F2: Topochemical conversion of a relativis- tic mott state into a spin-orbit driven band insulator, Phys. Rev. B98, 155128 (2018)

  16. [16]

    F. D. Romero, P. A. Bingham, S. D. Forder, and M. A. Hayward, Topochemical fluorination of Sr3(M0.5Ru0.5)2O7 (M = Ti, Mn, Fe),n= 2, ruddlesden–popper phases, Inorganic Chemistry52, 3388 (2013), pMID: 23441869

  17. [17]

    Kageyama, K

    H. Kageyama, K. Hayashi, K. Maeda, J. P. At- tfield, Z. Hiroi, J. M. Rondinelli, and K. R. Poep- pelmeier, Expanding frontiers in materials chemistry and physics with multiple anions, Nature Communications9, 10.1038/s41467-018-02838-4 (2018)

  18. [18]

    Acrivos, M

    J. Acrivos, M. Lei, C. Jiang, H. Nguyen, P. Metcalf, and J. Honig, Paramagnetism, antiferromagnetism, and superconductivity in La 2NiO4, Journal of Solid State Chemistry111, 343 (1994)

  19. [19]

    Gopalan, M

    P. Gopalan, M. W. McElfresh, Z. Ka ¸ kol, J. Spal/ek, and J. M. Honig, Influence of oxygen stoichiometry on the antiferromagnetic ordering of single crystals of La 2NiO4, Phys. Rev. B45, 249 (1992)

  20. [20]

    Paulus, A

    W. Paulus, A. Cousson, G. Dhalenne, J. Berthon, A. Revcolevschi, S. Hosoya, W. Treutmann, G. Heger, and R. L. Toquin, Neutron diffraction studies of stoichio- metric and oxygen intercalated La 2NiO4 single crystals, Solid State Sciences4, 565 (2002)

  21. [21]

    G. H. Lander, P. J. Brown, J. Spal/ek, and J. M. Honig, Structural and magnetization density studies of La2NiO4, Physical Review B40, 4463 (1989)

  22. [22]

    Wissel, A

    K. Wissel, A. M. Malik, S. Vasala, S. Plana-Ruiz, U. Kolb, P. R. Slater, I. da Silva, L. Alff, and O. Clemens, Topochemical reduction of La2NiO3F2: the first ni-based ruddlesden–poppern= 1 t-type structure and the im- pact of reduction on magnetic ordering, Chemistry of Materials32, 3160 (2020)

  23. [23]

    Bernardini, A

    F. Bernardini, A. Demourgues, and A. Cano, Single-layer T′-type nickelates: Ni 1+ is Ni1+, Physical Review Mate- rials5, l061801 (2021)

  24. [24]

    J. K. Harada, N. Charles, N. Z. Koocher, Y. Wang, K. R. Kamp, M. R. Baxter, K. R. Poeppelmeier, D. Puggioni, and J. M. Rondinelli, Heteroanionic stabilization of Ni 1+ with nonplanar coordination in layered nickelates, Phys- ical Review Materials8, 024803 (2024)

  25. [25]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Supercon- ductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate, Nature572, 624 (2019)

  26. [26]

    Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear anti- ferromagnets,

    P. Puphal, Y.-M. Wu, K. F¨ ursich, H. Lee, M. Pak- daman, J. A. N. Bruin, J. Nuss, Y. E. Suyolcu, P. A. van Aken, B. Keimer, M. Isobe, and M. Hepting, Topotac- tic transformation of single crystals: From perovskite to infinite-layer nickelates, Science Advances7, 10.1126/sci- adv.abl8091 (2021)

  27. [27]

    Y.-M. Wu, P. Puphal, H. Lee, J. Nuss, M. Isobe, B. Keimer, M. Hepting, Y. E. Suyolcu, and P. A. van Aken, Topotactically induced oxygen vacancy order in nickelate single crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 053609 (2023). 11

  28. [28]

    Y. E. Suyolcu, P. Puphal, and M. Hepting, Three gener- ations of infinite-layer nickelate crystals, MRS Commu- nications 10.1557/s43579-025-00689-x (2025)

  29. [29]

    Y.-M. Wu, P. Puphal, M. Isobe, B. Keimer, M. Hepting, Y. E. Suyolcu, and P. A. van Aken, Unraveling nano-scale effects of topotactic reduction in LaNiO 2 crystals, APL Materials12, 10.1063/5.0227732 (2024)

  30. [30]

    Tamura, A

    H. Tamura, A. Hayashi, and Y. Ueda, Phase diagram of La2NiO4+δ (0≤δ≤0.18), Physica C: Superconductivity 216, 83 (1993)

  31. [31]

    M. A. Nowroozi, K. Wissel, M. Donzelli, N. Hos- seinpourkahvaz, S. Plana-Ruiz, U. Kolb, R. Schoch, M. Bauer, A. M. Malik, J. Rohrer, S. Ivlev, F. Kraus, and O. Clemens, High cycle life all-solid-state fluoride ion battery with La 2NiO4+δ high voltage cathode, Commu- nications Materials1, 10.1038/s43246-020-0030-5 (2020)

  32. [32]

    Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal, M

    J. Rodr´ ıguez-Carvajal, M. T. Fern´ andez-D´ ıaz, and J. L. Mart´ ınez, Neutron diffraction study on structural and magnetic properties of La 2NiO4, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter3, 3215 (1991)

  33. [33]

    Jacobs, A

    J. Jacobs, A. Bivour, V. Sikolenko, H. Kohlmann, T. C. Hansen, J. R. Hester, K. Xu, J. Schmedt auf der G¨ unne, and S. G. Ebbinghaus, Unveiling the fluorination path- way of ruddlesden–popper oxyfluorides: A comprehen- sive in situ x-ray and neutron diffraction study, Journal of the American Chemical Society147, 9739 (2025)

  34. [34]

    Jacobs, H.-C

    J. Jacobs, H.-C. Wang, M. A. L. Marques, and S. G. Ebbinghaus, Ruddlesden–popper oxyfluorides La2Ni1−xCuxO3F2 (0≤x≤1): Impact of the Ni/Cu ratio on the thermal stability and magnetic properties, Inorganic Chemistry63, 11317 (2024)

  35. [35]

    Puphal, M

    P. Puphal, M. Y. P. Akbar, M. Hepting, E. Go- ering, M. Isobe, A. A. Nugroho, and B. Keimer, Single crystal synthesis, structure, and mag- netism of Pb 10−xCux(PO4)6O, APL Materials11, 10.1063/5.0172755 (2023)

  36. [36]

    J. A. Krieger, T. J. Hicken, H. Luetkens, R. K. Kremer, and P. Puphal, Exerting chemical pressure on the kagome lattice as frustration control in the kapellasite family ACu3(OH)6+x(Cl,Br) 3−x, Physical Review Research7, 10.1103/mgyp-pcpl (2025)

  37. [37]

    Hayashida, V

    S. Hayashida, V. Sundaramurthy, P. Puphal, M. Garcia- Fernandez, K.-J. Zhou, B. Fenk, M. Isobe, M. Minola, Y.-M. Wu, Y. E. Suyolcu, P. A. van Aken, B. Keimer, and M. Hepting, Investigation of spin excitations and charge order in bulk crystals of the infinite-layer nick- elate LaNiO2, Phys. Rev. B109, 235106 (2024)

  38. [38]

    Scimeca, S

    M. Scimeca, S. Bischetti, H. K. Lamsira, R. Bonfiglio, and E. Bonanno, Energy dispersive x-ray (edx) micro- analysis: A powerful tool in biomedical research and di- agnosis, European Journal of Histochemistry62, 2841 (2018)

  39. [39]

    Arumugam, P

    S. Arumugam, P. Sivaprakash, A. Dixit, R. Chaurasiya, L. Govindaraj, M. Sathiskumar, S. Chatterjee, and R. Suryanarayanan, Complex magnetic structure and magnetocapacitance response in a non-oxide NiF 2 sys- tem, Scientific Reports9, 10.1038/s41598-019-39083-8 (2019)

  40. [40]

    Ferenc Segedin, J

    D. Ferenc Segedin, J. Kim, H. LaBollita, N. K. Taylor, K.-Y. Baek, S. H. Sung, A. B. Turkiewicz, G. A. Pan, A. Y. Jiang, M. Bambrick-Santoyo, T. Schwaigert, C. K. Kim, A. Tenneti, A. J. Grutter, S. Muramoto, A. T. N’Diaye, I. El Baggari, D. A. Walko, C. M. Brooks, A. S. Botana, D. G. Schlom, H. Zhou, and J. A. Mundy, Topochemical oxidation of ruddlesden–p...

  41. [41]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y. Hwang, Signa- tures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7, Nature638, 935 (2024). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the Solid State Spectroscopy department for the use of their SQUID and PPMS systems. H....