pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25833 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Four-Loop Gluon Anomalous Dimension of General Lorentz Spin: Transcendental Part

B.A. Kniehl , S.-O. Moch , V.N. Velizhanin , A. Vogt
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords four-loop QCDgluon anomalous dimensionzeta(3)splitting functionsparton distribution functionsMellin momentstwist-two operatorssupersymmetric Yang-Mills
0
0 comments X

The pith

The zeta(3) contribution to the four-loop gluon anomalous dimension gamma_gg^(3)(N) is constructed in analytic form for arbitrary Lorentz spin N.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper determines the part proportional to zeta(3) of the four-loop anomalous dimension of the twist-two gluon operator in the quark singlet sector for any spin N. It does so by feeding known low-N moments into the Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovasz lattice algorithm, then supplementing the result with generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity, new self-tuning relations among singlet anomalous dimensions, and data from supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories. The same approach supplies the rational piece proportional to C_F^2 n_f^2. These pieces translate directly into exact terms of the four-loop splitting function P_gg^(3)(x) after inverse Mellin transformation. The resulting expressions tighten the theoretical uncertainty on how parton distributions evolve with scale in QCD.

Core claim

We construct the contribution proportional to zeta(3) to the four-loop anomalous dimension gamma_gg^(3)(N) of the twist-two gluon operator for arbitrary N in the singlet sector by applying the Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovasz algorithm to available low-N moments, exploiting generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity and new self-tuning relations for the singlet anomalous dimension matrix, and injecting information from N=1 and N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories; we also give the rational contribution with color factor C_F^2 n_f^2. Exact pieces of the four-loop splitting function P_gg^(3)(x) obtained via inverse Mellin transformation reduce theoretical uncertainties in the scaling violations of parton

What carries the argument

The Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovasz lattice reduction algorithm applied to low-N moments of the anomalous dimension, augmented by generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity and self-tuning relations for the singlet sector.

If this is right

  • Exact transcendental and rational contributions to the four-loop splitting function P_gg^(3)(x) become available for the gluon channel.
  • Theoretical uncertainties on the scale evolution of parton distribution functions in QCD are reduced.
  • The method supplies a template that can be repeated for other color structures or higher transcendental weights at four loops.
  • The resulting splitting functions can be inserted directly into global PDF fits and DGLAP evolution codes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reciprocity relations continue to hold, the same lattice-reduction approach could isolate the zeta(5) or higher-weight terms at four loops or beyond.
  • Numerical lattice or Monte-Carlo evaluations of moments at moderate N could provide an immediate cross-check of the constructed expression.
  • The results improve the precision frontier for predictions of scaling violations at the LHC and future colliders.

Load-bearing premise

Generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity and the new self-tuning relations for the singlet anomalous dimension matrix remain valid at four loops so that supersymmetric Yang-Mills information can be used without uncontrolled errors.

What would settle it

An independent four-loop computation of the anomalous dimension at a sufficiently high specific N (such as N=12) that yields a zeta(3) coefficient differing from the analytic expression obtained here.

read the original abstract

We consider the anomalous dimension $\gamma_{gg}^{(3)}(N)$ of the twist-two gluon operator of arbitrary Lorentz spin $N$ in the quark flavor singlet sector of a general gauge theory at four loops and construct its contribution proportional to $\zeta(3)$ in analytic form by applying the Lenstra-Lenstra-Lov\'{a}sz algorithm to the available low-$N$ moments. We exploit generalized Gribov-Liptov reciprocity, establish new self-tuning relations for the anomalous dimension matrix of the singlet sector, and inject information from $\mathcal{N}=1,4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories. We also present the contribution to the rational part of $\gamma_{gg}^{(3)}(N)$ with color factor $C_F^2n_f^2$. Exact contributions to the four-loop splitting function $P_{gg}^{(3)}(x)$ hence resulting via inverse Mellin transformation help us to reduce theoretical uncertainties in scaling violations of parton distribution functions in QCD.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the contribution proportional to ζ(3) to the four-loop gluon anomalous dimension γ_gg^(3)(N) for arbitrary Lorentz spin N in the quark flavor singlet sector. This is achieved by applying the Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovász (LLL) algorithm to low-N moments, while exploiting generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity, establishing new self-tuning relations for the singlet anomalous dimension matrix, and incorporating information from N=1 and N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories. Additionally, the rational part with color factor C_F² n_f² is presented, leading to exact contributions to the four-loop splitting function P_gg^(3)(x) via inverse Mellin transform.

Significance. If the results hold, this provides valuable analytic expressions for higher-order QCD corrections to anomalous dimensions and splitting functions. Such results are significant for reducing theoretical uncertainties in the evolution of parton distribution functions, which is crucial for precision phenomenology at colliders like the LHC. The combination of moment-based reconstruction with symmetry relations and SUSY inputs represents a powerful approach in the field.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section describing the LLL ansatz construction] The completeness of the basis of possible transcendental structures (products of harmonic sums and zeta values) used in the LLL reconstruction must be explicitly demonstrated. An incomplete basis risks producing a compact but incorrect analytic form that fits the given moments but does not represent the true expression.
  2. [Section on self-tuning relations] The newly established self-tuning relations for the anomalous dimension matrix are load-bearing for constraining the ansatz. Their derivation should be shown to be independent of the low-N moment data used in the reconstruction to avoid potential circularity.
  3. [Discussion of generalized reciprocity] The extension of generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity to four loops is assumed; a clear statement or proof of its validity in this context is needed, as it underpins the reduction of the parameter space for the ζ(3) term.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'exact contributions' but the main result is only the ζ(3) part plus one rational term; clarify the scope of what is fully determined.
  2. [Notation] Ensure consistent use of superscripts for loop order and subscripts for color factors throughout the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and the insightful comments. We respond to each major comment in turn below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The completeness of the basis of possible transcendental structures (products of harmonic sums and zeta values) used in the LLL reconstruction must be explicitly demonstrated. An incomplete basis risks producing a compact but incorrect analytic form that fits the given moments but does not represent the true expression.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to include a more explicit demonstration of the basis completeness in the section describing the LLL ansatz. The basis is constructed from all terms allowed by the weight and the known analytic properties of the anomalous dimensions at lower orders. We have performed checks by extending the basis with additional structures, which result in inconsistent systems for the given moments, indicating that the chosen basis is complete within the constraints. A full mathematical proof of completeness is not feasible without the exact result, but this is the standard approach used in similar reconstructions in the literature. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The newly established self-tuning relations for the anomalous dimension matrix are load-bearing for constraining the ansatz. Their derivation should be shown to be independent of the low-N moment data used in the reconstruction to avoid potential circularity.

    Authors: The self-tuning relations are derived purely from the general properties of the singlet sector anomalous dimension matrix and do not depend on the low-N moments. We will add an appendix with the full derivation, which starts from the definition of the evolution operator and the required algebraic constraints on the matrix elements. This ensures there is no circularity in the application to the LLL reconstruction. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The extension of generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity to four loops is assumed; a clear statement or proof of its validity in this context is needed, as it underpins the reduction of the parameter space for the ζ(3) term.

    Authors: We will include a clear statement in the revised manuscript explaining that the generalized reciprocity is extended based on its established validity through three loops and its consistency with the supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories considered. While a rigorous proof at four loops is not provided here, as it would require a separate investigation, the assumption is validated by the agreement with independent results in the N=4 SYM limit. We believe this addresses the concern. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; reconstruction uses independent inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central step applies the LLL algorithm to independently computed low-N moments (presumed external) to recover the analytic zeta(3) contribution, after constraining the ansatz via generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity and newly established self-tuning relations. Supersymmetric Yang-Mills information is injected from external sources. No quoted equation or self-citation chain reduces the final analytic form to a tautological fit of the same data by construction; the low-N moments and SYM inputs remain independent benchmarks, and the result is presented as an interpolation whose validity can be checked via inverse Mellin transform against higher-N behavior. This is the normal, non-circular case for moment-based reconstructions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on domain assumptions about reciprocity and self-tuning relations plus external supersymmetric data; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Generalized Gribov-Lipatov reciprocity holds for the four-loop gluon anomalous dimension
    Exploited to constrain the functional form from moments
  • domain assumption Self-tuning relations exist for the singlet-sector anomalous dimension matrix at four loops
    New relations established and used to reduce unknowns
  • domain assumption Results from N=1 and N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories can be directly injected into QCD expressions
    Used to fix remaining coefficients after LLL reconstruction

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5486 in / 1486 out tokens · 44562 ms · 2026-05-07T15:56:37.438270+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Properties and implications of the four-loop non-singlet splitting functions in QCD

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Four-loop non-singlet QCD splitting functions are verified for consistency and used to finalize analytical forms for the gluon virtual anomalous dimension and N^4LL threshold resummation coefficients, revealing a new ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    for all N, we may thus analytically reconstruct tr ˆγ(3) ζ3 from the known Mellin moments ofγ (3) gg,ζ 3 [34, 39, 43, 46] and so obtainγ (3) gg,ζ 3 = tr ˆγ(3) ζ3 −γ (3)+ ns,ζ3 −γ (3) ps,ζ3 for allN. 3 The sought-aftern 1 f andn 0 f terms ofγ (3) gg,ζ 3 come with color factorsn f C 3 F ,n f CAC 2 F ,n f C 2 ACF ,n f C 3 A, nf d(4) RA/na,C 4 A, andd (4) AA/...

    2019

  2. [2]

    and similar contributions toγ (3) ps withC ACF n2 f [36] andγ (3) gq withC ACF n2 f [38]. Such terms do not yet appear inγ (2) ij [20–25], but were already observed at two loops in the coefficient functions of inclusive deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) by photon exchange [87, 88]. They emerge from D−2S−2(N−2) forN= 2 and allow us to predict that γ(3) gg,ra...

  3. [3]

    J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, Inelastic Electron- Proton andγ-Proton Scattering and the Structure of the Nucleon, Phys. Rev.185, 1975–1982 (1969) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.185.1975

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.185.1975 1975

  4. [4]

    Fritzsch, M

    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, Advan- tages of the color octet gluon picture, Phys. Lett. B47, 365–368 (1973) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90625-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90625-4 1973

  5. [5]

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Deep inelasticepscatter- ing in perturbation theory, Yad. Fiz.15, 781–807 (1972) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.15, 438–450 (1972)]

    1972

  6. [6]

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov,e +e−-pair annihilation and deep inelasticepscattering in perturbation theory, Yad. Fiz.15, 1218–1237 (1972) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.15, 675–684 (1972)]

    1972

  7. [7]

    Altarelli, G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic freedom in par- ton language, Nucl. Phys. B126, 298–318 (1977). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90384-4 1977

  8. [8]

    Yu. L. Dokshitzer, Calculation of the structure functions for deep inelastic scattering ande +e− annihilation by perturbation theory in Quantum Chromodynamics, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73, 1216–1240 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641–653 (1977)]

    1977

  9. [9]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5, 1–91 (1989) doi:10.1142/9789814503266 0001 [arXiv:hep-ph/0409313 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814503266 1989

  10. [10]

    On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

    S. Alekhin, M. V. Garzelli, S. Moch, and O. Zenaiev, De- termination of the strong coupling from high-energy data, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 161 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 026-15403-x [arXiv:2510.21435 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2026

  11. [11]

    Alekhin and S

    S. Alekhin and S. Moch, Heavy-quark deep-inelastic scattering with a running mass, Phys. Lett. B 699(2011) 345–353 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.026 [arXiv:1011.5790 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.026 2011

  12. [12]

    Alekhin, K

    S. Alekhin, K. Daum, K. Lipka and S. Moch, Deter- mination of the charm-quark mass in the MS scheme using charm production data from deep inelastic scat- tering at HERA, Phys. Lett. B718(2012) 550– 557 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.010 [arXiv:1209.0436 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.010 2012

  13. [13]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories. I, Phys. Rev. D8, 3633–3652 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.3633

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.3633 1973

  14. [14]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Asymptotically free gauge theories. II, Phys. Rev. D9, 980–993 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.980

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.980 1974

  15. [15]

    E. G. Floratos, D. A. Ross, and C. T. Sachrajda, Higher-order effects in asymptotically free gauge theo- ries: The anomalous dimensions of Wilson operators, Nucl. Phys. B129, 66–88 (1977);139, 545–546(E) (1978) doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(77)90020-7; doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(78)90367-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90020-7 1977

  16. [19]

    Furmanski and R

    W. Furmanski and R. Petronzio, Singlet parton densities beyond leading order, Phys. Lett. B97, 437–442 (1980) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90636-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90636-x 1980

  17. [21]

    S. A. Larin, P. Nogueira, T. van Ritbergen, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, The 3-loop QCD calculation of the moments of deep inelastic structure functions, Nucl. Phys. B492, 338–378 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(97)80038-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/9605317 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550- 1997

  18. [22]

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: the non- singlet case, Nucl. Phys. B688, 101–134 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.030 [hep-ph/0403192]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.030 2004

  19. [23]

    A. Vogt, S. Moch, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: the sin- glet case, Nucl. Phys. B691, 129–181 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.024 [hep-ph/0404111]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.04.024 2004

  20. [24]

    Ablinger, A

    J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, and C. Schneider, The 3-loop pure sin- glet heavy flavor contributions to the structure function F2(x, Q2) and the anomalous dimension, Nucl. Phys. B 890, 48–151 (2014) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.10.008 [arXiv:1409.1135 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.10.008 2014

  21. [25]

    Bl¨ umlein, P

    J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, C. Schneider, and K. Sch¨ onwald, The three-loop unpolarized and po- larized non-singlet anomalous dimensions from off shell operator matrix elements, Nucl. Phys. B971, 115542 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115542 [arXiv:2107.06267 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115542 2021

  22. [26]

    Bl¨ umlein, P

    J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, C. Schneider, and K. Sch¨ onwald, The massless three-loop Wilson coefficients for the deep-inelastic structure func- tionsF 2,F L,xF 3 andg 1, JHEP11, 156 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)156 [arXiv:2208.14325 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)156 2022

  23. [27]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, and T. Z. Yang, Renormalization of twist-two operators in covariant gauge to three loops in QCD, JHEP04, 041 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)041 [arXiv:2302.00022 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)041 2023

  24. [28]

    J. A. Gracey, Anomalous dimension of non-singlet Wil- son operators atO(1/N f) in deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B322, 141–146 (1994) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(94)90502-9 [arXiv:hep-ph/9401214 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1994

  25. [29]

    V. N. Velizhanin, Four loop anomalous dimension of the second moment of the non-singlet twist-2 op- erator in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B860, 288–294 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.03.006 [arXiv:1112.3954 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.03.006 2012

  26. [30]

    V. N. Velizhanin, Four-loop anomalous dimension of the third and fourth moments of the nonsinglet twist-2 op- erator in QCD, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050199 (2020) doi:10.1142/S0217751X20501997 [arXiv:1411.1331 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20501997 2020

  27. [31]

    Davies, A

    J. Davies, A. Vogt, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. A. M. Ver- maseren, Large-n f contributions to the four-loop splitting functions in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B915, 335–362 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.12.012 [arXiv:1610.07477 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.12.012 2017

  28. [32]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Four-loop non-singlet splitting functions in the planar limit and beyond, JHEP10, 041 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)041 [arXiv:1707.08315 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)041 2017

  29. [33]

    Davies and A

    J. Davies and A. Vogt, Absence ofπ 2 terms in physical anomalous dimensions in DIS: Veri- fication and resulting predictions, Phys. Lett. B 776, 189–194 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.036 [arXiv:1711.05267 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.036 2018

  30. [34]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, On quartic colour factors in splitting functions and the gluon cusp anomalous dimension, Phys. Lett. B 782, 627–632 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.017 [arXiv:1805.09638 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.017 2018

  31. [35]

    G. Das, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, Approximate four- loop QCD corrections to the Higgs-boson production cross section, Phys. Lett. B807, 135546 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135546 [arXiv:2004.00563 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135546 2020

  32. [36]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Ver- maseren, and A. Vogt, Low moments of the four- loop splitting functions in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 825, 136853 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136853 [arXiv:2111.15561 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136853 2022

  33. [37]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark- quark case, Phys. Lett. B842, 137944 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137944 [arXiv:2302.07593 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137944 2023

  34. [38]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T.-Z. Yang, CompleteN 2 f contributions to four-loop pure-singlet splitting functions, JHEP01, 029 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)029 [arXiv:2308.07958 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)029 2024

  35. [39]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and A. Vogt, Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The gluon- to-quark case, Phys. Lett. B846, 138215 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138215 [arXiv:2307.04158 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138215 2023

  36. [40]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, The double fermionic contribution to the four- loop quark-to-gluon splitting function, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138351 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138351 [arXiv:2310.01245 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138351 2024

  37. [41]

    S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Additional moments andx-space approximations of four-loop splitting functions in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138468 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138468 [arXiv:2310.05744 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138468 2024

  38. [42]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T.-Z. Yang, TheN f C 3 F contribution to the non-singlet splitting function at four-loop order, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138427 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138427 [arXiv:2310.12240 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138427 2024

  39. [43]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt, Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – The quark-to-gluon case,” Phys. Lett. B856, 138906 (2024) 7 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138906 [arXiv:2404.09701 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138906 2024

  40. [44]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, and S. Van Thuren- hout, Constraints for twist-two alien operators in QCD, JHEP11, 080 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)080 [arXiv:2409.02870 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)080 2024

  41. [45]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt, Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –, Phys. Lett. B860, 139194 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139194 [arXiv:2410.08089 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139194 2025

  42. [46]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Four-Loop Anomalous Dimension of Flavor Nonsinglet Twist- Two Operator of General Lorentz Spin in QCD: ζ(3) Term, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 131901 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.131901 [arXiv:2503.20422 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.131901 2025

  43. [47]

    B. A. Kniehl, S. Moch, V. N. Velizhanin, and A. Vogt, Flavor Nonsinglet Splitting Functions at Four Loops in QCD: Fermionic Contributions, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 071902 (2025) doi:10.1103/hkg5-88hr [arXiv:2505.09381 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/hkg5-88hr 2025

  44. [48]

    Falcioni, F

    G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni, and A. Vogt, Additional results on the four-loop flavour- singlet splitting functions in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 875, 140278 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140278 [arXiv:2512.10783 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140278 2026

  45. [49]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Four-loop anomalous dimension of flavor non-singlet quark operator of twist two and Lorentz spinNfor general gauge group: tran- scendental part, submitted to Nucl. Phys. B

  46. [50]

    The four-loop non-singlet splitting functions in QCD

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, V. Sotnikov, and T. Yang, The four-loop non-singlet splitting functions in QCD, [arXiv:2604.09534 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [51]

    Jamin and R

    M. Jamin and R. Miravitllas, Absence of even- integerζ-function values in Euclidean physical quan- tities in QCD, Phys. Lett. B779, 452–455 (2018) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.030 [arXiv:1711.00787 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.030 2018

  48. [52]

    P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin, The struc- ture of generic anomalous dimensions and no-πtheo- rem for massless propagators, JHEP06, 141 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)141 [arXiv:1804.10088 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)141 2018

  49. [53]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 2037–2076 doi:10.1142/S0217751X99001032 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806280 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x99001032 1999

  50. [54]

    A. K. Lenstra, H. W. Lenstra, and L. Lov´ asz, Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients, Math. Ann.261, 515–534 (1982) doi:10.1007/BF01457454

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01457454 1982

  51. [55]

    Albrech, D

    M. Albrech, D. Cad´ e, X. Pujol, and D. Stehl´ e (The FPLLL development team),fplll, a lattice reduction library, 2016, available at https://github.com/fplll/fplll

    2016

  52. [56]

    V. N. Velizhanin, Six-loop anomalous dimension of twist-three operators inN= 4 SYM, JHEP11, 129 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)129 [arXiv:1003.4717 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2010)129 2010

  53. [57]

    V. N. Velizhanin, Twist-2 at five loops: wrapping cor- rections without wrapping computations, JHEP06, 108 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)108 [arXiv:1311.6953 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)108 2014

  54. [58]

    Marboe, V

    C. Marboe, V. Velizhanin, and D. Volin, Six-loop anomalous dimension of twist-two operators in pla- narN= 4 SYM theory, JHEP07, 084 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)084 [arXiv:1412.4762 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2015)084 2015

  55. [59]

    Marboe and V

    C. Marboe and V. Velizhanin, Twist-2 at seven loops in planarN= 4 SYM theory: full re- sult and analytic properties, JHEP11, 013 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)013 [arXiv:1607.06047 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)013 2016

  56. [60]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Nonplanar cusp and transcendental anomalous dimension at four loops inN= 4 supersymmetric Yang- Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 061603 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.061603 [arXiv:2010.13772 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.061603 2021

  57. [61]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Non-planar uni- versal anomalous dimension of twist-two operators with general Lorentz spin at four loops inN= 4 SYM theory, Nucl. Phys. B968, 115429 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115429 [arXiv:2103.16420 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115429 2021

  58. [62]

    V. N. Velizhanin, NNNLLA BFKL pomeron eigenvalue in the planarN= 4 SYM theory, [arXiv:2106.06527 [hep- th]]

    work page arXiv

  59. [63]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Anomalous dimen- sions of twist-two operators in extendedN= 2 and N= 4 super Yang-Mills theories, Nucl. Phys. B1001, 116511 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116511 [arXiv:2312.05888 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116511 2024

  60. [64]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin, Nonplanar four-loop anomalous dimensions of twist-two oper- ators inN= 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory: Higher moment, general result, and cusp anoma- lous dimension, Phys. Rev. D111, L061902 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L061902 [arXiv:2409.09463 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.l061902 2025

  61. [65]

    V. N. Velizhanin, Three loop anomalous di- mension of the non-singlet transversity opera- tor in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B864, 113–140 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.06.010 [arXiv:1203.1022 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.06.010 2012

  62. [66]

    Sun Tzu Suan Ching, 3rd to 5th century AD, see,e.g., D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms, 3rd ed., Adison–Wesley, Read- ing, Massachusetts, 1997

    1997

  63. [67]

    S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, The three-Loop splitting functions in QCD: The helicity- dependent case, Nucl. Phys. B889, 351–400 (2014) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.10.016 [arXiv:1409.5131 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.10.016 2014

  64. [68]

    Yu. L. Dokshitzer, G. Marchesini, and G. P. Salam, Revisiting parton evolution and the large- xlimit, Phys. Lett. B634, 504–507 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.02.023 [arXiv:hep- ph/0511302 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.02.023 2006

  65. [69]

    Yu. L. Dokshitzer and G. Marchesini,N= 4 SUSY Yang-Mills: Three loops made simple(r), Phys. Lett. B 646, 189–201 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.016 [arXiv:hep-th/0612248 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.01.016 2007

  66. [70]

    Basso and G

    B. Basso and G. P. Korchemsky, Anomalous dimensions of high-spin operators beyond the leading order, Nucl. Phys. B775, 1–30 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.03.044 [arXiv:hep- th/0612247 [hep-th]]. 8

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.03.044 2007

  67. [71]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Non- Abelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 1343–1346 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1343 1973

  68. [72]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 1346–1349 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1346 1973

  69. [73]

    D. R. T. Jones, Two-loop diagrams in Yang-Mills the- ory, Nucl. Phys. B75(1974) 531–538 doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(74)90093-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1974

  70. [74]

    W. E. Caswell, Asymptotic Behavior of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories to Two-Loop Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33(1974) 244–246 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.244

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.33.244 1974

  71. [75]

    O. V. Tarasov, A. A. Vladimirov, and A. Yu. Zharkov, The gell-mann-low function of QCD in the three- loop approximation, Phys. Lett. B93(1980) 429–432 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90358-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90358-5 1980

  72. [76]

    S. A. Larin and J. A. M. Vermaseren, The three-loop QCDβ-function and anomalous dimensions, Phys. Lett. B303(1993) 334–336 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91441- O [arXiv:hep-ph/9302208 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91441- 1993

  73. [77]

    Buryak, P.D

    T. van Ritbergen, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and S. A. Larin, The four-loopβ-function in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B400, 379–384 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(97)00370-5 [arXiv:hep-ph/9701390 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 1997

  74. [78]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, Four-loop renormalization of QCD: Full set of renormalization constants and anomalous dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B710, 499–510 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.011 [arXiv:hep- ph/0405193 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.011 2005

  75. [79]

    Czakon, The four-loop QCDβ-function and anomalous dimensions, Nucl

    M. Czakon, The four-loop QCDβ-function and anomalous dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B710, 485–498 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.012 [arXiv:hep- ph/0411261 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.01.012 2005

  76. [80]

    Luthe, A

    T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and Y. Schr¨ oder, Towards the five-loop Beta function for a general gauge group, JHEP07, 127 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)127 [arXiv:1606.08662 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2016)127 2016

  77. [81]

    P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. K¨ uhn, Five-Loop Running of the QCD Coupling Con- stant, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 082002 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.082002 [arXiv:1606.08659 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.082002 2017

  78. [82]

    The five- loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions,

    F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, The five-loop beta function of Yang- Mills theory with fermions, JHEP02, 090 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)090 [arXiv:1701.01404 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)090 2017

  79. [83]

    The five-loop Beta function for a general gauge group and anomalous dimensions beyond Feynman gauge,

    T. Luthe, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and Y. Schr¨ oder, The five-loop Beta function for a general gauge group and anomalous dimensions beyond Feynman gauge, JHEP10, 166 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)166 [arXiv:1709.07718 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)166 2017

  80. [84]

    Chen, T.-Z

    H. Chen, T.-Z. Yang, H.-X. Zhu, and Y.-J. Zhu, Ana- lytic continuation and reciprocity relation for collinear splitting in QCD, Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 043101 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abde2d [arXiv:2006.10534 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abde2d 2021

Showing first 80 references.