arxiv: 2604.25997 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Collisional energy loss distribution of a fast parton in a hot or dense QCD medium

G. Jackson , S. Peign\'e

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords collisional energy lossquenching weightquark-gluon plasmajet quenchingkinetic equationhard thermal loopelastic scatteringfinite path length

0 comments

The pith

The full probability distribution for collisional energy loss of an ultrarelativistic parton in a quark-gluon plasma has been computed from a resummed kinetic equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the probability distribution for the energy lost by a fast parton traversing a hot or dense QCD medium. Called the collisional quenching weight, it accounts for any number of elastic scatterings and includes the chance of energy gain from the medium. It is obtained by solving a kinetic equation and extends the usual treatment to finite path lengths. A sympathetic reader would care because this distribution should give more accurate input for modeling how jets lose energy in heavy-ion collisions than the average loss alone.

Core claim

The collisional quenching weight is the probability distribution for energy loss obtained from a kinetic equation that resums an arbitrary number of elastic scatterings of the energetic parton with the medium. Individual scatterings use the hard-thermal-loop approximation for soft exchanges with smooth matching to the hard domain, yielding a complete stochastic description that naturally applies to finite path lengths.

What carries the argument

The collisional quenching weight, obtained by solving the kinetic equation for the parton energy distribution after a finite path length, using a collision kernel with hard-thermal-loop soft exchanges matched to hard scatterings.

If this is right

Jet-quenching calculations can use the full distribution rather than only the average loss per unit length.
The framework applies directly to finite path lengths in light-ion, proton-nucleus, and proton-proton collisions.
Energy gain from thermal fluctuations is included, altering the low-energy tail of the distribution.
The approach supplies a baseline for isolating collisional effects from radiative ones in phenomenological studies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The distribution could be convolved with radiative loss distributions inside Monte Carlo jet-evolution codes.
Moments of the weight may relate to transport coefficients such as momentum diffusion in the medium.
The method could be extended to media with flow or anisotropy to test robustness of the matching procedure.

Load-bearing premise

The kinetic equation together with the smooth matching between soft and hard momentum exchanges correctly describes the stochastic energy exchanges for a parton traveling a finite distance.

What would settle it

A measurement of the shape or width of the energy-loss distribution for high-momentum jets in heavy-ion collisions with controlled path lengths that differs markedly from the distribution predicted by this quenching weight.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25997 by G. Jackson, S. Peign\'e.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Functions FT(ϵ) (left) and FL (ϵ) (right) defined by eq. (2.6) and using HTL gluon spectral densities. These functions are compared locally to their respective asymptotic expansions at ϵ ≪ mD , ϵ ≃ m√D 3 , and ϵ ≫ mD up to the order given in appendix B. appendix B. The functions FT (ϵ) and FL (ϵ), together with their asymptotic expansions, are shown in fig. 1. Note that FT(ϵ) remains finite when ϵ ≪ mD , F… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The matching factor R, defined in eq. (3.26), as a function of ϵ in units of the hard scale Λ = max(πT, µ). Several choices of Nf , T and µ are shown (in the Nf = 0 case, obviously µ = 0). The limiting values of 1 and 1 2 are indicated by horizontal gray lines. do not exactly coincide. Since in that case, using an “intermediate scale” ϵ ⋆ as in eq. (3.25) becomes specious, in what follows we will use eq. (… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Energy loss distribution fT =0 (x, ∆) with µ = 3mD , for several values of the dimensionless variable x¯ (defined in (4.6)). The left panel plots the distribution as a function of ∆ , in units of mD . The same curves are shown in the right panel in terms of the scaling variables appearing in eq. (4.7) (here κ defined in eq. (4.4) is κ ≈ 2.16), better illustrating how fT =0 (x, ∆) approaches the Landau dist… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Magnification of the small ∆ behaviour of fT =0 (x, ∆) (for µ = 3mD) from the left panel of fig. 3, showing the cases x¯ = {0.1, 0.2, 2}. The thin gray lines are from the two lowest order terms shown in eq. (4.13) (not counting the Dirac-δ). The accuracy of the “two-scattering” truncated expansion obviously deteriorates when ∆ or x¯ grows. limit of large ∆ for fixed x¯, where the distribution also tends to… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Illustration of the qualitative change in the distribution f when introducing thermal effects. The left panel shows the same T = 0 curve as in fig. 3 for x¯ = 0.3 , together with the distributions f(x, ∆) for small, increasing values of T (all for µ = 3mD). The latter distributions exhibit a pronounced peak near ∆ ≃ 0 , which is reminiscent of the Dirac-δ term in the T = 0 distribution. On the right panel,… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Results for the full distribution, demonstrating the feature of energy gain (∆ < 0). The same x¯ values are shown in fig. 3 for T = 0 and µ = 3 mD . Here T = 3 mD , µ = 0 and Nf = 3 . The left panel shows the distribution in units of mD and the right panel shows the same curves scaled as in eq. (4.7) (with κ ≈ 2.78 in the present case). We see how the initial distribution f(x = 0, ∆) = δ(∆) broadens when x… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The standard Bromwich contour (B) used for taking the inverse Laplace transform, as in eq. (2.7), needed to solve the kinetic equation determining f(x, ∆). In our case, B must fall within the strip of convergence 0 ≤ Re[ν] ≤ β ≡ 1/T, due to the integral defining I(ν). contour to coincide with the imaginary axis, i.e. ν0 = 0 . We thus need to evaluate I(ν) numerically for each ν lying on the imaginary axis.… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The functions G and H defined by eqs. (C.2) and (C.3) respectively. Here T = mD and µ = 3mD (with Nf = 3). For the function G we show G0 ≡ G(η) view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We compute the probability distribution for collisional energy loss of an ultrarelativistic parton crossing a quark-gluon plasma. This collisional quenching weight has not been determined previously, unlike the average collisional loss per unit distance, although it should be a more accurate quantity to use in jet-quenching phenomenology. The quenching weight is obtained from a well-known kinetic equation which resums an arbitrary number of elastic scatterings of the energetic parton with the medium, providing a complete description of the stochastic energy exchange, including the possibility of energy gain from thermal fluctuations. The formulation also naturally extends the standard treatment of collisional energy loss to finite path lengths, which could be relevant not only for heavy-ion collisions, but also for light-ion, and possibly proton-nucleus and proton-proton collisions. We predict the quenching weight in a setup where individual elastic scatterings are described using the hard thermal loop approximation for soft exchanges, with a smooth matching to the hard domain.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper computes the full collisional quenching weight distribution for finite path lengths, which is new and builds on standard kinetic theory.

read the letter

The main thing here is that Jackson and Peigné have worked out the probability distribution for collisional energy loss of an ultrarelativistic parton in a quark-gluon plasma. Unlike the long-known average loss per unit length, this full distribution has not been available before, and they obtain it by solving a kinetic equation that resums any number of elastic scatterings. The setup includes energy gains from thermal fluctuations and extends naturally to finite path lengths, which matters for modeling in heavy-ion, light-ion, or even proton-nucleus collisions. They describe individual scatterings with hard-thermal-loop rates for soft exchanges matched smoothly to the hard domain. This is a direct step forward for jet-quenching phenomenology because the distribution should give more accurate predictions than using only the mean loss. The approach stays within established Boltzmann transport and HTL methods, so it does not introduce new free parameters or circular fits. The finite-length treatment follows from evolving the kinetic equation in time, which is a straightforward extension. A soft spot is the matching between soft and hard regimes. If that procedure is not tested against known limits such as infinite path length or zero temperature, small artifacts could appear in the tails of the distribution, though nothing in the abstract suggests an obvious inconsistency. The abstract is high-level, so explicit numerical checks and implementation details would need to be verified in the full text. This paper is for readers who build or use jet-quenching models at RHIC and LHC energies. A phenomenologist looking for a better handle on stochastic collisional losses would get concrete value from it. It deserves a serious referee because it fills a documented gap with a reproducible calculation inside a standard framework.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes the probability distribution (quenching weight) for collisional energy loss of an ultrarelativistic parton traversing a quark-gluon plasma. The distribution is obtained by solving a kinetic equation that resums an arbitrary number of elastic scatterings, incorporates both energy loss and thermal energy gain, and extends the standard treatment to finite path lengths. Individual scatterings are modeled with the hard-thermal-loop approximation for soft momentum exchanges, smoothly matched to the hard domain.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a previously unavailable collisional quenching weight that is more suitable for jet-quenching phenomenology than the mean energy loss alone. The finite-length formulation broadens applicability to light-ion, p-A, and possibly p-p collisions. Credit is due for the clean resummation via the kinetic equation, the explicit inclusion of energy gain, and the parameter-free character of the underlying transport framework once the matching is fixed.

major comments (1)

[§3.2] §3.2 (matching procedure): the smooth interpolation between the HTL soft regime and the hard domain is load-bearing for the finite-length distribution. Without an explicit demonstration that the first moment of the resulting probability distribution reproduces the known infinite-path-length collisional dE/dx (or that higher moments remain stable under reasonable variations of the matching scale), the stochastic distribution carries an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and introduction would benefit from a one-sentence statement of the numerical method used to solve the kinetic equation (e.g., Monte Carlo sampling of the collision integral or direct discretization).
Figure captions should explicitly state the medium temperature, path length, and parton energy used for each panel so that the plots can be reproduced from the text alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comment on the matching procedure. We address the point raised below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate an explicit verification as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (matching procedure): the smooth interpolation between the HTL soft regime and the hard domain is load-bearing for the finite-length distribution. Without an explicit demonstration that the first moment of the resulting probability distribution reproduces the known infinite-path-length collisional dE/dx (or that higher moments remain stable under reasonable variations of the matching scale), the stochastic distribution carries an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration would strengthen the paper and control the systematic uncertainty. The kinetic equation is constructed from the same matched scattering kernel used to compute the standard collisional dE/dx, so the first moment satisfies the known average-loss equation by design. Nevertheless, to directly address the referee's concern for the finite-length case, we will add a verification in the revised manuscript (new figure or appendix in §3) showing that the mean extracted from the probability distribution reproduces the known infinite-path-length result in the appropriate limit, together with a stability test of higher moments under variations of the matching scale. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation follows from standard kinetic equation

full rationale

The paper computes the collisional quenching weight by solving a well-known kinetic equation that resums elastic scatterings, using HTL soft exchanges with smooth hard matching. This is a direct numerical or analytic evolution of the transport equation for finite path lengths, including energy gain. No parameter is fitted to the output distribution itself, no self-definition of the result occurs, and no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz is invoked to force the outcome. The central claim (previously uncomputed distribution) is obtained from independent first-principles inputs (Boltzmann-type transport + standard QCD rates) without reduction to the target quantity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; the ledger therefore lists only the assumptions stated at that level. No free parameters or new entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption A kinetic equation can resum an arbitrary number of elastic scatterings to give the complete stochastic energy-exchange distribution.
Invoked to obtain the quenching weight from multiple scatterings.
domain assumption Hard-thermal-loop approximation plus smooth matching to the hard domain correctly describes individual elastic scatterings.
Used for the microscopic collision rates inside the kinetic equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 1364 out tokens · 41423 ms · 2026-05-07T15:34:42.642078+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

J. D. Bjorken, Energy Loss of Energetic Partons in Quark-Gluon Plasma: Possible Extinction of High pT Jets in Hadron-Hadron Collisions, FERMILAB-PUB-82-059-THY
[2]

Suppression of Hadrons with Large Transverse Momentum in Central Au+Au Collisions at $sqrt {s sub {sub {NN}}}_ = 130 GeV

PHENIX Collaboration, K. Adcox et al. , Suppression of Hadrons with Large Transverse Mo- mentum in Central Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 022301 [nucl-ex/0109003]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[3]

PHENIX Collaboration, S. S. Adler et al. , Suppressed π0 production at Large Transverse Mo- mentum in Central Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 072301 [nucl-ex/0304022]

work page arXiv 2003
[4]

Adler et al

ST ARCollaboration, C. Adler et al. , Centrality Dependence of High- pT Hadron Suppression in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 130 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 202301 [nucl-ex/0206011]

work page arXiv 2002
[5]

PHENIX Collaboration, S. S. Adler et al. , Nuclear Modification of Electron Spectra and Impli- cations for Heavy Quark Energy Loss in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 032301 [nucl-ex/0510047]

work page arXiv 2006
[6]

ST ARCollaboration, B. I. Abelev et al. , Transverse Momentum and Centrality Dependence of High-pT Nonphotonic Electron Suppression in Au+Au Collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 192301 [nucl-ex/0607012]

work page arXiv 2007
[7]

d’Enterria, Jet quenching, Landolt-Bornstein 23 (2010) 471 [0902.2011]

D. d’Enterria, Jet quenching, Landolt-Bornstein 23 (2010) 471 [0902.2011]

work page arXiv 2010
[8]

Majumder and M

A. Majumder and M. Van Leeuwen, The Theory and Phenomenology of Perturbative QCD Based Jet Quenching, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66 (2011) 41 [1002.2206]

work page arXiv 2011
[9]

Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions: a review

S. Cao and X.-N. Wang, Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (2021) 024301 [2002.04028]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

G.-Y. Qin, J. Ruppert, C. Gale, S. Jeon, G. D. Moore, and M. G. Mustafa, Radiative and Collisional Jet Energy Loss in the Quark-Gluon Plasma at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 072301 [0710.0605]

work page arXiv 2008
[11]

Heavy Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma

R. Rapp and H. van Hees, Heavy Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma, in Quark-gluon plasma 4 (R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang, eds.), pp. 111–206, 2010 [ 0903.1096]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[12]

Faraday and W

C. Faraday and W. A. Horowitz, Statistical analysis of pQCD energy loss across system size, flavor, √sN N, and p T , JHEP 11 (2025) 019 [2505.14568]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Khachatryan et al

CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al. , Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 193 [1606.06198]

work page arXiv 2017
[14]

Aaboud et al

A TLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al. , Measurements of long-range azimuthal anisotropies and associated Fourier coeﬀicients for pp collisions at √s = 5.02 and 13 TeV and p+Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 024908 [1609.06213]

work page arXiv 2017
[15]

Aaboud et al

A TLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al. , Measurement of long-range multiparticle azimuthal correlations with the subevent cumulant method in pp and p + P b collisions with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 024904 [1708.03559]. 35

work page arXiv 2018
[16]

Observation of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen-oxygen collisions

CMS Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al. , Observation of Suppressed Charged-Particle Pro- duction in Ultrarelativistic Oxygen-Oxygen Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (2026) 162301 [2510.09864]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[17]

Energy losses in a hot plasma revisited

S. Peigné and A. V. Smilga, Energy losses in a hot plasma revisited, Phys. Usp. 52 (2009) 659 [0810.5702]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[18]

M. H. Thoma and M. Gyulassy, Quark damping and energy loss in the high temperature QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 351 (1991) 491

1991
[19]

Braaten and M

E. Braaten and M. H. Thoma, Energy loss of a heavy fermion in a hot QED plasma, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 1298

1991
[20]

Peigné and A

S. Peigné and A. Peshier, Collisional energy loss of a fast muon in a hot QED plasma, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014015 [0710.1266]

work page arXiv 2008
[21]

Peshier, QCD Collisional Energy Loss Reexamined, Phys

A. Peshier, QCD Collisional Energy Loss Reexamined, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 212301 [hep-ph/0605294]

work page arXiv 2006
[22]

Peigné and A

S. Peigné and A. Peshier, Collisional energy loss of a fast heavy quark in a quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 114017 [0802.4364]

work page arXiv 2008
[23]

Baier, Y

R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, and D. Schiff, Quenching of hadron spectra in media, JHEP 09 (2001) 033 [hep-ph/0106347]

work page arXiv 2001
[24]

C. A. Salgado and U. A. Wiedemann, Calculating quenching weights, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 014008 [hep-ph/0302184]

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[25]

A. Huss, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Paatelainen, W. van der Schee, and U. A. Wiede- mann, Predicting parton energy loss in small collision systems, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2021) 054903 [2007.13758]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

A. Huss, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Paatelainen, W. van der Schee, and U. A. Wiedemann, Discovering Partonic Rescattering in Light Nucleus Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 192301 [2007.13754]

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

Peshier, Collisional jet quenching becomes probable, Phys

A. Peshier, Collisional jet quenching becomes probable, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 034906 [hep-ph/0607299]

work page arXiv 2007
[28]

Faraday and W

C. Faraday and W. A. Horowitz, Collisional and radiative energy loss in small systems, Phys. Rev. C 111 (2025) 054911 [2408.14426]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

L. D. Landau, On the energy loss of fast particles by ionisation, J. Phys. (USSR) 8 (1944) 201

1944
[30]

Navas et al

Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al. , Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

2024
[31]

J. F. Bak, A. Burenkov, J. B. B. Petersen, E. Uggerhøj, S. P. Møller, and P. Siffert, Large departures from Landau distributions for high-energy particles traversing thin Si and Ge targets, Nucl. Phys. B 288 (1987) 681

1987
[32]

Bichsel, Straggling in Thin Silicon Detectors, Rev

H. Bichsel, Straggling in Thin Silicon Detectors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 663 . 36

1988
[33]

S. V. Trofymenko, Chudakov effect for the most probable value of high-energy electron–positron pair ionization loss in thin targets, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 32 [2206.14247]

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

J. W. Lindeberg, Eine neue Herleitung des Exponentialgesetzes in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrech- nung, Math. Z. 15 (1922) 211

1922
[35]

G. D. Moore and D. Teaney, How much do heavy quarks thermalize in a heavy ion collision?, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 064904 [hep-ph/0412346]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[36]

Jet-Medium Interactions at NLO in a Weakly-Coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma

J. Ghiglieri, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, Jet-medium interactions at NLO in a weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasma, JHEP 03 (2016) 095 [1509.07773]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[37]

Peshier, Turning on the charm, Nucl

A. Peshier, Turning on the charm, Nucl. Phys. A 888 (2012) 7 [0801.0595]

work page arXiv 2012
[38]

P. B. Arnold and W. Xiao, High-energy jet quenching in weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 125008 [0810.1026]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[39]

O(g) plasma effects in jet quenching

S. Caron-Huot, O(g) plasma effects in jet quenching, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 065039 [0811.1603]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[40]

Blaizot, F

J.-P. Blaizot, F. Dominguez, E. Iancu, and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Probabilistic picture for medium- induced jet evolution, JHEP 06 (2014) 075 [1311.5823]

work page arXiv 2014
[41]

Boguslavski, A

K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, and J. Peuron, Jet quenching parameter in QCD kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034019 [2312.00447]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Braaten and R

E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Calculation of the quark damping rate in hot QCD, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1829

1992
[43]

R. D. Pisarski, Damping rates for moving particles in hot QCD, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5589

1993
[44]

Vanderheyden and J.-Y

B. Vanderheyden and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Damping rates of hard momentum particles in a cold ultrarelativistic plasma, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 5108 [hep-ph/9611415]

work page arXiv 1997
[45]

Le Bellac and C

M. Le Bellac and C. Manuel, Damping rate of quasiparticles in degenerate ultrarelativistic plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3215 [hep-ph/9609369]

work page arXiv 1997
[46]

Y. L. Dokshitzer, Perturbative QCD for beginners, in European School of High-Energy Physics, Dubna, Russia, 27 Aug–9 Sep 1995 (N. Ellis and M. Neubert, eds.), CERN Yellow Reports: School Proceedings, pp. 59–120, 1996

1995
[47]

Braaten and T

E. Braaten and T. C. Yuan, Calculation of screening in a hot plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2183

1991
[48]

R. D. Pisarski, Scattering Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1129

1989
[49]

Frenkel and J

J. Frenkel and J. C. Taylor, High Temperature Limit of Thermal QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 334 (1990) 199

1990
[50]

Braaten and R

E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 569

1990
[51]

H. A. Weldon, Covariant Calculations at Finite Temperature: The Relativistic Plasma, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1394 . 37

1982
[52]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskiĭ, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media . Perg- amon Press, 2nd ed., 1984

1984
[53]

J. C. Taylor and S. M. H. Wong, The Effective Action of Hard Thermal Loops in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 346 (1990) 115

1990
[54]

Blaizot and E

J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, The quark–gluon plasma: collective dynamics and hard thermal loops, Phys. Rept. 359 (2002) 355 [hep-ph/0101103]

work page arXiv 2002
[55]

Braaten and R

E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Simple effective Lagrangian for hard thermal loops, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) R1827

1992
[56]

J. I. Kapusta, Quantum chromodynamics at high temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 148 (1979) 461

1979
[57]

Laine and A

M. Laine and A. Vuorinen, Basics of Thermal Field Theory , vol. 925. Springer, 2016, [1701.01554]

work page arXiv 2016
[58]

Braaten and A

E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Next-to-Leading Order Debye Mass for the Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 2402 [hep-ph/9408273]

work page arXiv 1994
[59]

A simple sum rule for the thermal gluon spectral function and applications

P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, and H. Zaraket, A Simple sum rule for the thermal gluon spectral function and applications, JHEP 05 (2002) 043 [hep-ph/0204146]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[60]

A. D. Linde, Infrared problem in thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills gas, Phys. Lett. B 96 (1980) 289

1980
[61]

Jackson, Numerical code for the collisional energy exchange probability distribution of a fast parton in a QGP, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19438672, (2026)

G. Jackson, Numerical code for the collisional energy exchange probability distribution of a fast parton in a QGP, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19438672, (2026)

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19438672 2026
[62]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products . Academic Press, 7th ed., 2007

2007
[63]

P. V. Vavilov, Ionization Losses of High-Energy Heavy Particles, Sov. Phys. JETP 5 (1957) 749

1957
[64]

Jackson and M

G. Jackson and M. Laine, ν ¯ν production, annihilation, and scattering at MeV temperatures and NLO accuracy, JCAP 05 (2025) 054 [2412.03958]

work page arXiv 2025
[65]

Talbot, The Accurate Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms, J

A. Talbot, The Accurate Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms, J. Inst. Maths Applics 23 (1979) 97

1979
[66]

W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing . Cambridge University Press, 3rd ed., 2007. 38

2007