arxiv: 2604.26031 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

Report of the 5th PVUW Challenge: Towards More Diverse Modalities in Pixel-Level Understanding

Chang Liu , Henghui Ding , Nikhila Ravi , Yunchao Wei , Shuting He , Song Bai , Philip Torr , Leilei Cao

show 35 more authors

Jinrong Zhang Deshui Miao Xusheng He Dengxian Gong Zhiyu Wang Mingqi Gao Jihwan Hong Canyang Wu Weili Guan Jianlong Wu Liqiang Nie Xingsen Huang Yameng Gu Xiaogang Yu Xin Li Ming-Hsuan Yang Sijie Li Jungong Han Quanzhu Niu Shihao Chen Yuanzheng Wu Yikang Zhou Tao Zhang Haobo Yuan Lu Qi Shunping Ji Chao Yang Chao Tian Guoqing Zhu Kai Yang Zhifan Mo Haijun Zhang Xudong Kang Shutao Li Jaeyoung Do

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords pixel-level video understandingmultimodal segmentationobject trackingacoustic-driven segmentationmotion languageocclusion handlingchallenge reportunconstrained video

0 comments

The pith

The 2026 PVUW challenge adds an audio track to test multimodal pixel-level video segmentation under real-world constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This report covers the 2026 Pixel-level Video Understanding in the Wild challenge, which ran three tracks to evaluate models on difficult video data. One track requires tracking objects through dense clutter and heavy occlusion. Another uses language descriptions focused on motion to find targets. The newest track uses audio signals to guide object segmentation in video. The authors release new challenging datasets and review the leading submitted methods to show what current multimodal techniques can achieve and where further work is needed for reliable scene comprehension.

Core claim

The report presents the challenge setup, new unreleased datasets, and analysis of top participant methods across the MOSE track for occluded tracking, the MeViS-Text track for motion-language localization, and the inaugural MeViS-Audio track for acoustic-driven segmentation, thereby documenting the latest capabilities and open problems in multimodal pixel-level video understanding.

What carries the argument

The three specialized tracks (MOSE, MeViS-Text, and the new MeViS-Audio) that evaluate submitted multimodal solutions on previously unreleased data under highly unconstrained conditions.

If this is right

Models that combine visual, text, and audio inputs outperform single-modality approaches on occluded and cluttered scenes.
Acoustic cues allow segmentation of objects that are visually ambiguous but distinct by sound.
Motion-focused language expressions help disambiguate targets in crowded videos better than generic descriptions.
The released datasets will become standard benchmarks for testing generalization in video pixel-level tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Adding audio could help video systems work in low-light or heavily occluded settings where vision alone fails.
Similar challenge formats could incorporate depth or thermal data to broaden multimodal coverage.
The performance gaps observed in severe occlusion indicate that better mechanisms for partial object visibility are still required.
Top methods could transfer to applications such as surveillance or robotics that naturally provide audio alongside video.

Load-bearing premise

The new datasets and challenge tracks capture truly unconstrained real-world video conditions and that the top submitted methods reflect generalizable advances instead of challenge-specific tuning.

What would settle it

Running the top challenge models on an independent collection of videos recorded under similar but unseen real-world conditions and measuring whether their accuracy holds or drops sharply.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26031 by Canyang Wu, Chang Liu, Chao Tian, Chao Yang, Dengxian Gong, Deshui Miao, Guoqing Zhu, Haijun Zhang, Haobo Yuan, Henghui Ding, Jaeyoung Do, Jianlong Wu, Jihwan Hong, Jinrong Zhang, Jungong Han, Kai Yang, Leilei Cao, Liqiang Nie, Lu Qi, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Mingqi Gao, Nikhila Ravi, Philip Torr, Quanzhu Niu, Shihao Chen, Shunping Ji, Shutao Li, Shuting He, Sijie Li, Song Bai, Tao Zhang, Weili Guan, Xiaogang Yu, Xingsen Huang, Xin Li, Xudong Kang, Xusheng He, Yameng Gu, Yikang Zhou, Yuanzheng Wu, Yunchao Wei, Zhifan Mo, Zhiyu Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The architecture of the proposed TEP framework, which view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Pipeline of OAMVOS. Overview. The method is built on top of the SAM3- based DAM4SAM tracker. Let It denote frame t, mt the predicted mask, and pt ∈ R d the corresponding object pointer. After initialization, each frame is processed in one of three modes: stable, ambiguous, recovery. In the stable mode, the tracker follows the original DAM4SAM path and performs speculative prediction on the current frame. R… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Overview of our two-stage framework. We address the MOSEv2 challenge by extending SAM 3 with an automatic re-prompting strategy based on objectlevel retrieval. The key idea is to move beyond the standard semi-supervised VOS setting where only the first frame serves as the visual anchor. Instead, we automatically identify reliable target candidates from later frames and use them as additional prompts. Over… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The Existence-aware verification illustration of our view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Overview of our method. In this section, we present ASR-SaSaSa2VA, a modular framework for audio-guided video object segmentation. As illustrated in view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Overall architecture of VIRST-Audio. We propose VIRST-Audio, which builds upon VIRST (Video-Instructed Reasoning Assistant for Spatio-Temporal Segmentation) [16]. The overall pipeline is illustrated in view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This report summarizes the objectives, datasets, and top-performing methodologies of the 2026 Pixel-level Video Understanding in the Wild (PVUW) Challenge, hosted at CVPR 2026, which evaluates state-of-the-art models under highly unconstrained conditions. To provide a comprehensive assessment, the 2026 edition features three specialized tracks: the MOSE track for tracking objects within densely cluttered and severely occluded scenarios; the MeViS-Text track for localizing targets via motion-focused linguistic expressions; and the newly inaugurated MeViS-Audio track, which pioneers acoustic-driven object segmentation. By introducing previously unreleased challenging data and analyzing the cutting-edge, multimodal solutions submitted by participants, this report highlights the community's latest technical advancements and charts promising future directions for robust video scene comprehension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Standard challenge report adding an audio track to existing video segmentation benchmarks, with limited new analysis or methods.

read the letter

This is a competition summary for the 5th PVUW challenge, focused on pixel-level video understanding under tough conditions. The new element is the MeViS-Audio track, which uses sound cues to segment objects in video alongside the MOSE occlusion track and MeViS-Text track. The report lays out the datasets, goals, and some participant approaches, then notes future directions for multimodal video work. It does a straightforward job of documenting the event and making the new data public, which helps the community track progress on cluttered, occluded scenes. The abstract and structure are clear about what each track tests. The soft spots are typical for these reports. Claims about cutting-edge multimodal solutions rest on whatever the top entries submitted, but without detailed ablations or tests on other datasets, it's unclear how much is genuine advance versus tuning to the specific test statistics like occlusion patterns or audio heuristics. The stress-test point about limited generalizability holds unless the full paper shows cross-validation or controls for that. No equations or derivations appear, so no circularity issues. This is for researchers who follow video segmentation benchmarks and want quick access to the latest challenge results and data. It is not a core methods paper. It deserves peer review to verify the reported numbers and ensure the new track is described accurately, even if the review focuses on documentation rather than novelty.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports on the 5th PVUW Challenge at CVPR 2026, describing three tracks (MOSE for object tracking in densely cluttered and occluded scenes, MeViS-Text for localizing targets with motion-focused text, and the new MeViS-Audio track for acoustic-driven segmentation), the introduction of previously unreleased challenging datasets, and an analysis of top participant multimodal methods, with the goal of highlighting technical advancements and future directions in robust video scene comprehension.

Significance. If the participant analyses hold and the new tracks/datasets prove effective, the report would provide a useful community benchmark for multimodal pixel-level video understanding, particularly by pioneering audio integration and exposing models to highly unconstrained conditions.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the report analyzes 'cutting-edge, multimodal solutions' and charts 'promising future directions for robust video scene comprehension' rests on an unverified assumption that top entries reflect generalizable advances rather than challenge-specific optimizations (e.g., ensembling or post-processing tuned to MOSE occlusion statistics or MeViS-Audio cue heuristics). No ablations or cross-dataset evaluations are referenced to support this, which is load-bearing for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our report of the 5th PVUW Challenge. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the report analyzes 'cutting-edge, multimodal solutions' and charts 'promising future directions for robust video scene comprehension' rests on an unverified assumption that top entries reflect generalizable advances rather than challenge-specific optimizations (e.g., ensembling or post-processing tuned to MOSE occlusion statistics or MeViS-Audio cue heuristics). No ablations or cross-dataset evaluations are referenced to support this, which is load-bearing for the central claim.

Authors: We agree with the referee that the abstract's claims could be interpreted as assuming generalizability without sufficient evidence from ablations or cross-dataset tests. As authors of a challenge report, we describe the challenge setup, new datasets, and analyze the submitted solutions based on their reported performance and described methodologies. We do not have the resources or access to re-implement and ablate all top entries. The future directions are suggested based on what appeared effective in the challenge context. We will revise the abstract to more accurately describe the content of the report, for instance by replacing 'analyzing the cutting-edge, multimodal solutions' with 'presenting an overview of the top-performing multimodal solutions' and adjusting the future directions phrasing to 'discusses potential avenues for future research inspired by the challenge outcomes'. This revision will be made in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational challenge report with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

This is a summary report of a CVPR challenge that describes datasets, tracks, and external participant submissions. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains exist in the provided text. All claims are reports of observed results from independent teams rather than internally derived quantities that reduce to the paper's own inputs. The document is self-contained against external benchmarks (participant entries) and contains no self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No mathematical derivations, free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the document is an empirical competition summary.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 962 out tokens · 105974 ms · 2026-05-07T16:47:28.348263+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jianqiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, Hang Zhang, Zhibo Yang, Haiyang Xu, and Junyang Lin. Qwen2.5-vl technical report.ar...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[2]

Sam 3: Segment anything with concepts

Nicolas Carion, Laura Gustafson, Yuan-Ting Hu, Shoubhik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Didac Suris, Chaitanya Ryali, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Haitham Khedr, Andrew Huang, Jie Lei, Tengyu Ma, Baishan Guo, Arpit Kalla, Markus Marks, Joseph Greer, Meng Wang, Peize Sun, Roman Rdle, Triantafyllos Afouras, Effrosyni Mavroudi, Katherine Xu, Tsung-Han Wu, Yu Zhou, Liliane M...

2026
[3]

Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learning

Mehdi Cherti, Romain Beaumont, Ross Wightman, Mitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Cade Gordon, Christoph Schuh- mann, Ludwig Schmidt, and Jenia Jitsev. Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learning. In CVPR, pages 2818–2829, 2023. 8

2023
[4]

Context contrasted feature and gated multi- scale aggregation for scene segmentation

Henghui Ding, Xudong Jiang, Bing Shuai, Ai Qun Liu, and Gang Wang. Context contrasted feature and gated multi- scale aggregation for scene segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2393–2402, 2018. 1

2018
[5]

Boundary-aware feature propagation for scene segmentation

Henghui Ding, Xudong Jiang, Ai Qun Liu, Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, and Gang Wang. Boundary-aware feature propagation for scene segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 6819–6829, 2019

2019
[6]

Semantic correlation promoted shape-variant context for segmentation

Henghui Ding, Xudong Jiang, Bing Shuai, Ai Qun Liu, and Gang Wang. Semantic correlation promoted shape-variant context for segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8885–8894, 2019. 1

2019
[7]

MeViS: A large-scale benchmark for video segmentation with motion expressions

Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Xudong Jiang, and Chen Change Loy. MeViS: A large-scale benchmark for video segmentation with motion expressions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2694–2703, 2023. 1, 2

2023
[8]

MOSE: A new dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes

Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Xudong Jiang, Philip HS Torr, and Song Bai. MOSE: A new dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 20224–20234, 2023. 2

2023
[9]

LSVOS challenge report: Large-scale complex and long video object segmentation

Henghui Ding, Lingyi Hong, Chang Liu, Ning Xu, Linjie Yang, Yuchen Fan, Deshui Miao, Yameng Gu, Xin Li, Zhenyu He, et al. LSVOS challenge report: Large-scale complex and long video object segmentation. InECCV Workshop, 2024. 2

2024
[10]

PVUW 2024 challenge on complex video understanding: Methods and results

Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Yunchao Wei, Nikhila Ravi, Shuting He, Song Bai, Philip Torr, Deshui Miao, Xin Li, Zhenyu He, et al. PVUW 2024 challenge on complex video understanding: Methods and results. InECCV Workshop,

2024
[11]

Mevis: A multi-modal dataset for referring motion expression video segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Kaining Ying, Xudong Jiang, Chen Change Loy, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Mevis: A multi-modal dataset for referring motion expression video segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025. 2, 8

2025
[12]

Pvuw 2025 challenge report: Advances in pixel-level understanding of complex videos in the wild

Henghui Ding, Chang Liu, Nikhila Ravi, Shuting He, Yunchao Wei, Song Bai, and Philip Torr. Pvuw 2025 challenge report: Advances in pixel-level understanding of complex videos in the wild. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 2669– 2678, 2025. 2

2025
[13]

Mosev2: A more challenging dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05630, 2025

Henghui Ding, Kaining Ying, Chang Liu, Shuting He, Xudong Jiang, Yu-Gang Jiang, Philip HS Torr, and Song Bai. MOSEv2: A more challenging dataset for video object segmentation in complex scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05630, 2025. 1, 2

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Gemini 3.1 pro: Best for complex tasks and bringing creative concepts to life, 2026

Google DeepMind. Gemini 3.1 pro: Best for complex tasks and bringing creative concepts to life, 2026. 5

2026
[15]

Exploiting temporal state space sharing for video semantic segmentation

Syed Ariff Syed Hesham, Yun Liu, Guolei Sun, Henghui Ding, Jing Yang, Ender Konukoglu, Xue Geng, and Xudong Jiang. Exploiting temporal state space sharing for video semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
[16]

Virst: Video-instructed reasoning assistant for spatiotemporal segmentation

Jihwan Hong and Jaeyoung Do. Virst: Video-instructed reasoning assistant for spatiotemporal segmentation. In CVPR, 2026. to appear. 8

2026
[17]

T-rex2: Towards generic object detection via text-visual prompt synergy

Qing Jiang, Feng Li, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Shilong Liu, and Lei Zhang. T-rex2: Towards generic object detection via text-visual prompt synergy. InECCV, pages 38–57. Springer, 2024. 3

2024
[18]

Towards robust referring video object segmentation with cyclic structural consensus

Xiang Li, Jinglu Wang, Xiaohao Xu, Xiao Li, Bhiksha Raj, and Yan Lu. Towards robust referring video object segmentation with cyclic structural consensus. InICCV,
[19]

Transformer-based visual segmentation: A survey.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2024

Xiangtai Li, Henghui Ding, Haobo Yuan, Wenwei Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, Guangliang Cheng, Kai Chen, Ziwei Liu, and Chen Change Loy. Transformer-based visual segmentation: A survey.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2024. 1

2024
[20]

Lsvos 2025 challenge report: Recent advances in complex video object segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11063, 2025

Chang Liu, Henghui Ding, Kaining Ying, Lingyi Hong, Ning Xu, Linjie Yang, Yuchen Fan, Mingqi Gao, Jingkun Chen, Yunqi Miao, et al. Lsvos 2025 challenge report: Recent advances in complex video object segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11063, 2025. 2

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

The 1st solution for 7th lsvos rvos track: Sasasa2va.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16972, 2025

Quanzhu Niu, Dengxian Gong, Shihao Chen, Tao Zhang, Yikang Zhou, Haobo Yuan, Lu Qi, Xiangtai Li, and Shunping Ji. The 1st solution for 7th lsvos rvos track: Sasasa2va.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16972, 2025. 6, 7

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Introducing gpt-5.4, 2026

OpenAI. Introducing gpt-5.4, 2026. 5

2026
[23]

DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

Maxime Oquab, Timoth ´ee Darcet, Th ´eo Moutakanni, Huy V o, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023. 3

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[24]

VIBEVOICE-ASR technical re- port,

Zhiliang Peng, Jianwei Yu, Yaoyao Chang, Zilong Wang, Li Dong, Yingbo Hao, Yujie Tu, Chenyu Yang, Wenhui Wang, Songchen Xu, et al. Vibevoice-asr technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18184, 2026. 7

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos

Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. SAM 2: Segment anything in images and videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714, 2024. 1, 8

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[26]

Qwen3-ASR Technical Report

Xian Shi, Xiong Wang, Zhifang Guo, Yongqi Wang, Pei Zhang, Xinyu Zhang, Zishan Guo, Hongkun Hao, Yu Xi, Baosong Yang, et al. Qwen3-asr technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21337, 2026. 7

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[27]

A survey of multimodal- guided image editing with text-to-image diffusion models

Xincheng Shuai, Henghui Ding, Xingjun Ma, Rongcheng Tu, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Dacheng Tao. A survey of multimodal-guided image editing with text-to-image diffusion models.arXiv:2406.14555, 2024. 1

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

DINOv3

Oriane Sim ´eoni, Huy V V o, Maximilian Seitzer, Federico Baldassarre, Maxime Oquab, Cijo Jose, Vasil Khalidov, Marc Szafraniec, Seungeun Yi, Micha ¨el Ramamonjisoa, et al. Dinov3.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10104, 2025. 4

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[29]

Qwen3.5: Accelerating productivity with native multimodal agents, 2026

Qwen Team. Qwen3.5: Accelerating productivity with native multimodal agents, 2026. 5

2026
[30]

Towards open vocabulary learning: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(7):5092–5113, 2024

Jianzong Wu, Xiangtai Li, Shilin Xu, Haobo Yuan, Henghui Ding, Yibo Yang, Xia Li, Jiangning Zhang, Yunhai Tong, Xudong Jiang, et al. Towards open vocabulary learning: A survey.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(7):5092–5113, 2024. 1

2024
[31]

Visa: Reasoning video object segmentation via large language models

Cilin Yan, Haochen Wang, Shilin Yan, Xiaolong Jiang, Yao Hu, Guoliang Kang, Weidi Xie, and Efstratios Gavves. Visa: Reasoning video object segmentation via large language models. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 98–115. Springer, 2024. 8

2024
[32]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001 , year=

Haobo Yuan, Xiangtai Li, Tao Zhang, Zilong Huang, Shilin Xu, Shunping Ji, Yunhai Tong, Lu Qi, Jiashi Feng, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Sa2va: Marrying sam2 with llava for dense grounded understanding of images and videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001, 2025. 7

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Just a few glances: Open-set visual perception with image prompt paradigm

Jinrong Zhang, Penghui Wang, Chunxiao Liu, Wei Liu, Dian Jin, Qiong Zhang, Erli Meng, and Zhengnan Hu. Just a few glances: Open-set visual perception with image prompt paradigm. InAAAI, pages 9969–9976, 2025. 3

2025