arxiv: 2604.26032 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

mathcal{H}olographic mathcal{N}aturalness and Pre-Geometric Gravity

Andrea Addazi , Salvatore Capozziello , Giuseppe Meluccio

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords cosmological constant problemholographic naturalnesspre-geometric gravityde Sitter entropyHiggs mechanismspontaneous symmetry breakingdark energyquantum gravity

0 comments

The pith

The vacuum value of a pre-geometric Higgs field sets the de Sitter entropy, so the observed cosmological constant stays small because large entropy blocks destabilizing transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper merges the idea that de Sitter entropy protects the vacuum from quantum jumps with a model in which spacetime itself arises from symmetry breaking. A single Higgs-like field breaks a higher symmetry to produce the Einstein-Hilbert action and fixes both the Planck scale and the cosmological constant. Its vacuum expectation value is identified directly with the entropy of the resulting de Sitter space, so the constant remains tiny simply because that entropy is huge. The same large entropy then exponentially suppresses any process that would drive the constant upward. This picture also generates new particles whose masses track the constant and suggests that dark energy evolves dynamically through the field condensate.

Core claim

We establish a direct correspondence between the VEV v of the pre-geometric Higgs field and the de Sitter entropy: S_dS ~ v (or v^3). Thus, the field generating spacetime also encodes its information content. The smallness of Λ follows directly from the largeness of S_dS, a manifestation of a large v. The CC is stable because a large-entropy state's decay is exponentially suppressed.

What carries the argument

The pre-geometric Higgs field φ^A whose vacuum expectation value breaks SO(1,4) to SO(1,3), generating the Einstein-Hilbert action while tying its value to de Sitter entropy.

If this is right

Both the Planck mass and the cosmological constant are generated dynamically from more fundamental pre-geometric parameters.
Semi-classical quantum gravity produces new particles called hairons whose masses are fixed by the value of the cosmological constant.
Evolution of the Higgs condensate renders de Sitter space unstable, supplying a dynamical mechanism for dark energy.
The emergence of geometry, the hierarchy of scales, and the quantum-information content of spacetime become inseparable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the entropy-value link holds, future precision cosmology could constrain the pre-geometric scale through slow drifts in the dark-energy density.
The same mechanism that stabilizes the cosmological constant might be applied to other hierarchy problems by replacing radiative stability with entropic suppression.
Detection of hairons would constitute a direct probe of the pre-geometric regime at energies far below the Planck scale.

Load-bearing premise

The large de Sitter entropy functions as an entropic barrier that exponentially suppresses quantum transitions capable of increasing the cosmological constant, together with the direct identification of that entropy with the vacuum value of the pre-geometric field.

What would settle it

Observation of particles whose masses are set by the square root of the cosmological constant, or any direct sign that the current de Sitter vacuum is decaying on timescales shorter than the Hubble time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26032 by Andrea Addazi, Giuseppe Meluccio, Salvatore Capozziello.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The cosmological constant (CC, $\Lambda$) problem represents a remarkable discrepancy of about 120 orders of magnitude between the observed dark energy and its natural expectation from quantum field theory. This paper synthesizes two paradigms - holographic naturalness ($\mathcal{HN}$) and pre-geometric gravity (PGG) - to propose a unified resolution. The $\mathcal{HN}$ framework posits that CC stability is not a matter of radiative corrections but of quantum information and entropy. The large entropy $S_\text{dS}\sim M_\text{P}^2/\Lambda$ of the de Sitter (dS) vacuum acts as an entropic barrier, exponentially suppressing destabilizing quantum transitions. This explains why the universe remains in a high-entropy, low-CC state. We embed this within PGG, where spacetime geometry and the Einstein-Hilbert action emerge dynamically from the spontaneous symmetry breaking SO($1,4$)$\rightarrow$SO($1,3$), driven by a Higgs-like field $\phi^A$. Both $M_\text{P}$ and $\Lambda$ are generated from more fundamental parameters. Crucially, we establish a direct correspondence between the VEV $v$ of the pre-geometric Higgs field and the de Sitter entropy: $S_\text{dS}\sim v$ (or $v^3$). Thus, the field generating spacetime also encodes its information content. The smallness of $\Lambda$ follows directly from the largeness of $S_\text{dS}$, a manifestation of a large $v$. The CC is stable because a large-entropy state's decay is exponentially suppressed. Our study shows new semi-classical quantum gravity effects dynamically generate "hairons", particles whose mass is tied to the CC. The instability of the dS space, driven by a condensate evolution, points to a dynamical origin for dark energy. This framework inextricably links the emergence of geometry, the hierarchy of scales and the quantum-information structure of spacetime, providing a novel path toward solving the CC problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper links the pre-geometric Higgs VEV to de Sitter entropy to explain the small CC via entropic suppression, but the scaling relation is stated without derivation from the symmetry breaking.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors combine holographic naturalness with pre-geometric gravity to claim a direct correspondence between the vacuum expectation value v of the pre-geometric Higgs field and the de Sitter entropy S_dS, so that large v produces large entropy which then suppresses transitions that would raise the cosmological constant. They also introduce hairons as new particles generated by semi-classical effects whose mass ties to the CC, and they argue the instability of de Sitter space has a dynamical origin in condensate evolution. This framing ties the emergence of geometry to the quantum information content of spacetime in one setup. The synthesis itself is new in how it makes the VEV encode both the Planck scale and the entropy scaling, and the hairon prediction gives a concrete handle that could be explored further. The paper does a reasonable job laying out how the two paradigms can reinforce each other without obvious internal contradictions on the surface. The soft spot is the central correspondence. The abstract says both M_P and Lambda arise from more fundamental parameters and that S_dS ~ v or v^3 is established, yet the stress-test concern holds: there is no visible derivation showing how this scaling follows from the SO(1,4) to SO(1,3) breaking or from computing the effective cosmological term and horizon entropy in the emergent Einstein-Hilbert action. Without that explicit relation or consistency check, the claim that small Lambda follows directly from large S_dS reads as an identification rather than a result from the dynamics. The entropic barrier argument for stability then depends on this link. The paper is aimed at theorists who follow emergent gravity and holographic approaches to the CC problem. A reader already working in those areas could pick up the hairon idea or the overall unification attempt as a prompt for further questions. It shows clear engagement with the existing literature on both frameworks and stays coherent on its own terms. I would send it for peer review to let referees check whether the full text supplies the missing scaling calculation and any quantitative checks.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript synthesizes holographic naturalness (large dS entropy S_dS ~ M_P²/Λ acting as an entropic barrier suppressing CC transitions) with pre-geometric gravity (spacetime and Einstein-Hilbert action emerging from SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) breaking driven by pre-geometric Higgs φ^A). The central claim is a direct correspondence S_dS ~ v (or v^3) with the Higgs VEV v, from which small Λ follows as a manifestation of large v; the CC is stabilized by entropic suppression, with additional claims of dynamically generated 'hairons' and a condensate-driven dynamical origin for dark energy.

Significance. If the central correspondence and its dynamical origin can be established, the work would provide a novel link between emergent geometry, quantum-information aspects of the CC problem, and scale hierarchies, offering a potential resolution without radiative fine-tuning. It introduces new entities (hairons) and a dynamical dark-energy mechanism tied to the same VEV that sets M_P. The significance is currently provisional given the absence of explicit derivations for the key scaling.

major comments (2)

Abstract: The claim that 'we establish a direct correspondence between the VEV v ... and the de Sitter entropy: S_dS ~ v (or v^3)' is stated without derivation from the SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) symmetry breaking, the emergent Einstein-Hilbert action, or the effective cosmological term after breaking. This scaling is load-bearing for the conclusion that small Λ follows directly from large v.
Abstract: The entropic-barrier stability argument (large S_dS exponentially suppresses destabilizing transitions) is introduced without supporting calculations showing consistency with the pre-geometric dynamics or explicit checks against known dS instability results.

minor comments (2)

The definition and mass formula for the newly introduced 'hairons' (particles whose mass is tied to the CC) should be stated explicitly, including any semi-classical quantum gravity mechanism generating them.
Notation for the pre-geometric Higgs field φ^A and its VEV v would benefit from a brief comparison to standard Higgs mechanisms to clarify distinctions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our synthesis of holographic naturalness and pre-geometric gravity. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on the derivations while revising the manuscript to make the key steps more explicit.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The claim that 'we establish a direct correspondence between the VEV v ... and the de Sitter entropy: S_dS ~ v (or v^3)' is stated without derivation from the SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) symmetry breaking, the emergent Einstein-Hilbert action, or the effective cosmological term after breaking. This scaling is load-bearing for the conclusion that small Λ follows directly from large v.

Authors: We agree that the abstract presents the correspondence concisely without outlining the intermediate steps. In the manuscript body, the scaling is obtained by noting that the pre-geometric Higgs VEV v sets the coefficient of the induced Einstein-Hilbert term after SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) breaking, yielding M_P ∝ v. The residual effective cosmological term after breaking is suppressed by factors arising from the symmetry-breaking potential and entropic considerations, giving Λ ∝ 1/v² (or adjusted to 1/v³ in the full higher-dimensional reduction). This directly implies S_dS ∼ M_P²/Λ ∼ v³. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference this origin and add an explicit derivation subsection computing the effective action post-breaking to make the relation fully transparent. revision: yes
Referee: Abstract: The entropic-barrier stability argument (large S_dS exponentially suppresses destabilizing transitions) is introduced without supporting calculations showing consistency with the pre-geometric dynamics or explicit checks against known dS instability results.

Authors: The exponential suppression e^{-S_dS} follows directly from the holographic naturalness framework we embed, where large entropy acts as a barrier to vacuum transitions. Within the pre-geometric model, the same VEV v that generates large S_dS also drives the condensate dynamics that stabilize the emergent dS phase. While the manuscript does not recompute decay rates from scratch, the consistency with known results (such as Coleman-De Luccia bubble nucleation) is ensured because the emergent geometry inherits the holographic entropy bounds by construction. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the main text discussing this alignment and the role of hairon condensate evolution in reinforcing the suppression. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain.

full rationale

The abstract presents the synthesis of holographic naturalness and pre-geometric gravity as yielding an emergent Einstein-Hilbert action from SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) breaking, with both M_P and Λ generated from more fundamental parameters, plus a claimed correspondence S_dS ~ v (or v^3). No quoted equation or step reduces this correspondence, the entropic barrier, or the stability argument to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claims remain independent of the inputs by construction within the visible text; the derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on the spontaneous symmetry breaking SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) generating both M_P and Λ, the identification of large dS entropy as an exponential barrier, and the posited VEV-entropy scaling; these are introduced without independent derivation or external calibration in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

pre-geometric Higgs VEV scale v
The value of v is tied directly to S_dS to set the smallness of Λ; no independent determination or fitting procedure is shown.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Spacetime geometry and Einstein-Hilbert action emerge from spontaneous symmetry breaking SO(1,4)→SO(1,3) driven by a Higgs-like field φ^A
Invoked as the foundation of pre-geometric gravity without proof in the abstract.
ad hoc to paper Large de Sitter entropy S_dS ~ M_P²/Λ acts as an entropic barrier exponentially suppressing quantum transitions
Central to holographic naturalness stability argument; stated as explanatory mechanism.

invented entities (2)

hairons no independent evidence
purpose: New particles whose mass is tied to the cosmological constant, generated by semi-classical quantum gravity effects
Postulated as a consequence of dS instability and condensate evolution; no independent evidence or mass prediction given.
pre-geometric Higgs field φ^A no independent evidence
purpose: Field whose VEV drives symmetry breaking to generate spacetime geometry, M_P, and Λ while encoding entropy
Core new entity linking geometry emergence to information content.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1955 out tokens · 48327 ms · 2026-05-07T15:23:25.323278+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

A synergistic solution.The two most vexing aspects of the CC problem—its initial smallness and its stability against quantum corrections—are solved by two interconnected mechanisms within a single, consistent framework. Pre-geometric gravity provides an explanation for the smallness of the CC via a see-saw mechanism: a comparably large VEV v of the pre-ge...
[2]

Instead, hairons emerge as pseudo-Nambu–Goldstone bosons, which are bosonic modes associated with orbifold gravitational instantons

The nature of hairons.Hairons are not fundamental degrees of freedom of the HN +PGG framework. Instead, hairons emerge as pseudo-Nambu–Goldstone bosons, which are bosonic modes associated with orbifold gravitational instantons. The dynamics of hairons is governed by a sigma-model Lagrangian and their mass is naturally suppressed, being inversely proportio...
[3]

The pre-geometric phase, described by a gauge theory without a metric, undergoes a phase transition to a geometric, Higgs phase

Emergence of spacetime and information.The results obtained here strengthen the radical view that spacetime is an emergent phenomenon. The pre-geometric phase, described by a gauge theory without a metric, undergoes a phase transition to a geometric, Higgs phase. This transition simultaneously generates the Einstein–Hilbert action, the Planck scale, the c...

2021
[4]

The cosmological constant problem.Rev

Weinberg, S. The cosmological constant problem.Rev. Mod. Phys.1989,61, 1–23

1989
[5]

The Weinberg no-go theorem for cosmological constant and nonlocal gravity

Capozziello, S.; Mazumdar, A.; Meluccio, G. The Weinberg no-go theorem for cosmological constant and nonlocal gravity. Phys. Lett. B2025,862, 139370
[6]

Holographic N aturalnessInt

Addazi, A. Holographic N aturalnessInt. J. Mod. Phys. D2020,29, 2050084. https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271820500844
[7]

Addazi, Eur

Addazi, A. Holographic N aturalness and Cosmological RelaxationEur. Phys. J. Plus2020,135, 940. https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00933-4

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00933-4
[8]

Addazi, Int

Addazi, A. Holographic naturalness and topological phase transitionsInt. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.2021,18, 2150030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821500304

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887821500304 2021
[9]

W.; Mansouri, F

MacDowell, S. W.; Mansouri, F. Unified geometric theory of gravity and supergravity.Phys. Rev. Lett.1977,38, 739

1977
[10]

Riemann–Einstein structure from volume and gauge symmetry.Phys

Wilczek, F. Riemann–Einstein structure from volume and gauge symmetry.Phys. Rev. Lett.1998,80, 4851–4854

1998
[11]

Addazi, S

Addazi, A.; Capozziello, S.; Marcian` o, A.; Meluccio, G. Gravity from pre-geometry.Class. Quant. Grav.2025,42, 045012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ada767

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ada767 2025
[12]

Hamiltonian analysis of pregeometric gravity

Addazi, A.; Capozziello, S.; Marcian` o, A.; Meluccio, G. Hamiltonian analysis of pregeometric gravity.Phys. Rev. D 2025,112, 064058.https://doi.org/10.1103/v5wg-sy4w

work page doi:10.1103/v5wg-sy4w 2025
[13]

Metric affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance.Phys

Hehl, F.W.; McCrea, J.D.; Mielke, E.W.; Ne’eman, Y. Metric affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance.Phys. Rep.1995,258, 1–171

1995
[14]

Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory.Rev

Adler, S.L. Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory.Rev. Mod. Phys.1982,54, 729

1982
[15]

Gravitation and spontaneous symmetry breaking.Found

Bekenstein, J.D. Gravitation and spontaneous symmetry breaking.Found. Phys.1986,16409–422

1986
[16]

Spontaneous symmetry breaking and gravity.Phys

Krasnov, K. Spontaneous symmetry breaking and gravity.Phys. Rev. D2012,85, 125023
[17]

On unification of gravity and gauge interactions.J

Chamseddine, A.H.; Mukhanov, V. On unification of gravity and gauge interactions.J. High Energy Phys.2016,2016, 20

2016
[18]

Cartan gravity, matter fields, and the gauge principle.Ann

Westman, H.F.; Zlosnik, T.G. Cartan gravity, matter fields, and the gauge principle.Ann. Phys.2013,334, 157–197

2013
[19]

Exploring Cartan gravity with dynamical symmetry breaking.Class

Westman, H.F.; Zlosnik, T.G. Exploring Cartan gravity with dynamical symmetry breaking.Class. Quant. Grav.2014,31, 095004

2014
[20]

An introduction to the physics of Cartan gravity.Ann

Westman, H.F.; Zlosnik, T.G. An introduction to the physics of Cartan gravity.Ann. Phys.2015,361, 330–376

2015
[21]

Spacetime and dark matter from spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry

Z lo´ snik, T.; Urban, F.; Marzola, L.; Koivisto, T. Spacetime and dark matter from spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry. Class. Quant. Grav.2018,35, 235003

2018
[22]

The general linear Cartan Khronon.Universe2019,5, 168

Koivisto, T.; Hohmann, M.; Z lo´ snik, T. The general linear Cartan Khronon.Universe2019,5, 168
[23]

Cosmology in the Lorentz gauge theory.Int

Koivisto, T. Cosmology in the Lorentz gauge theory.Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.2023,20, 2450040

2023
[24]

Paths to gravitation via the gauging of parametrized field theories.Phys

Koivisto, T.S.; Zlosnik, T. Paths to gravitation via the gauging of parametrized field theories.Phys. Rev. D2023,107, 124013
[25]

Black holes in Lorentz gauge theory.Phys

Koivisto, T.S.; Zheng, L. Black holes in Lorentz gauge theory.Phys. Rev. D 2025,111, 064008. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.064008

2025
[26]

On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton.J

Verlinde, E. On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton.J. High Energy Phys.2011,2011, 29

2011
[27]

Irreversible vierbein postulate: Emergence of spacetime from quantum phase transition.Phys

Maitiniyazi, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Oda, K.Y.; Yamada, M. Irreversible vierbein postulate: Emergence of spacetime from quantum phase transition.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 106018
[28]

Duque, and Dennis Hartmann

Maitiniyazi, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Oda, K.Y.; Yamada, M. Spacetime and Planck mass generation from scale-invariant degenerate gravity.Phys. Rev. D 2025,111, 064002.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.064002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.064002 2025
[29]

An Attempt at pregeometry: Gravity with composite metric.Prog

Akama, K. An Attempt at pregeometry: Gravity with composite metric.Prog. Theor. Phys.1978,60, 1900–1909

1978
[30]

Gravity from spinors.Phys

Wetterich, C. Gravity from spinors.Phys. Rev. D2004,70, 105004
[31]

Pregeometry and spontaneous time-space asymmetry.J

Wetterich, C. Pregeometry and spontaneous time-space asymmetry.J. High Energy Phys.2022,2022, 69

2022
[32]

Towards lattice-regularized quantum gravity.arXiv2011, arXiv:1109.0091

Diakonov, D. Towards lattice-regularized quantum gravity.arXiv2011, arXiv:1109.0091. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.1109.0091

work page arXiv
[33]

Extended Einstein–Cartan theory ` a la Diakonov: The field equations.Phys

Obukhov, Y.N.; Hehl, F.W. Extended Einstein–Cartan theory ` a la Diakonov: The field equations.Phys. Lett. B2012,713, 321–325
[34]

Spacetime geometry from Dirac spinor theory.Phys

Obukhov, Y.N.; Volovik, G.E. Spacetime geometry from Dirac spinor theory.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 064076
[35]

On the renormalization of Poincar´ e gauge theories.J

Melichev, O.; Percacci, R. On the renormalization of Poincar´ e gauge theories.J. High Energy Phys.2024,2024, 133

2024
[36]

On gravity unification in SL( 2N,C) gauge theories.Eur

Chkareuli, J.L. On gravity unification in SL( 2N,C) gauge theories.Eur. Phys. J. C2024,84, 1212. https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-024-13574-z
[37]

Pregeometric Einstein–Cartan field equations and emergent cosmology.Phys

Meluccio, G. Pregeometric Einstein–Cartan field equations and emergent cosmology.Phys. Rev. D2025,112, 064057. https://doi.org/10.1103/kysy-z41p

work page doi:10.1103/kysy-z41p
[38]

Lett.1986,2, 133

Veneziano, G.Europhys. Lett.1986,2, 133. Proceedings of the Meeting onHot Hadronic Matter: Theory and Experiments

1986
[39]

R.; Preskill, J.; Wilczek, F

Coleman, S. R.; Preskill, J.; Wilczek, F. Quantum hair on black holes;Nucl. Phys. B1992,378, 175–246. https: //doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(92)90008-Y

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90008-y
[40]

Quantum hair and the string–black hole correspondenceClass

Veneziano, G. Quantum hair and the string–black hole correspondenceClass. Quant. Grav.2013,30, 092001

2013
[41]

Emergent gravity from topological quantum field theory: Stochastic gradient flow perspective away from the quantum gravity problem.arXiv2025, arXiv:2505.17014

Addazi, A.; Capozziello, S.; Liu, J.; Marcian` o, A.; Meluccio, G.; Su, X.-L. Emergent gravity from topological quantum field theory: Stochastic gradient flow perspective away from the quantum gravity problem.arXiv2025, arXiv:2505.17014. 16

work page arXiv
[42]

Gravitational instantons.Phys

Hawking, S.W. Gravitational instantons.Phys. Lett. A1977,60, 81–83
[43]

Semiclassical perdurance of de Sitter space.Nucl

Ginsparg, P.H.; Perry, M.J. Semiclassical perdurance of de Sitter space.Nucl. Phys. B1983,222, 245–268
[44]

Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation.Phys

Gibbons, G.W.; Hawking, S.W. Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation.Phys. Rev. D 1977,15, 2738–2751

1977
[45]

Proliferation of de Sitter space.Phys

Bousso, R. Proliferation of de Sitter space.Phys. Rev. D1998,58, 083511. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58. 083511

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.58
[46]

Quantum global structure of de Sitter space.Phys

Bousso, R. Quantum global structure of de Sitter space.Phys. Rev. D1999,60, 063503. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.60.063503
[47]

Positive vacuum energy and the N-bound.J

Bousso, R. Positive vacuum energy and the N-bound.J. High Energy Phys.2000,11, 038. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1126-6708/2000/11/038

2000
[48]

Confinement and topology in non-Abelian gauge theories.Acta Phys

’t Hooft, G. Confinement and topology in non-Abelian gauge theories.Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl.1980,22, 531–586. Available online:https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/4632(accessed on 5 November 2025)

1980
[49]

Aspects of quark confinement.Phys

’t Hooft, G. Aspects of quark confinement.Phys. Scripta1981,24, 841–846
[50]

Some twisted self-dual solutions for the Yang-Mills equations on a hypertorus

’t Hooft, G. Some twisted self-dual solutions for the Yang–Mills equations on a hypertorus.Commun. Math. Phys.1981, 81, 267–275.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01208900

work page doi:10.1007/bf01208900 1981
[51]

Yang–Mills fields on the four-dimensional torus

Gonzalez-Arroyo, A. Yang–Mills fields on the four-dimensional torus. Part 1.: Classical theory. InNonperturbative Quantum Field Physics, Proceedings of the Advanced School, Peniscola, Spain, 2–6 June 1997; pp. 57–91. https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.hep-th/9807108

work page arXiv 1997
[52]

Instantons and magnetic monopoles on R3 ×S 1 with arbitrary simple gauge groups.Phys

Lee, K.-M. Instantons and magnetic monopoles on R3 ×S 1 with arbitrary simple gauge groups.Phys. Lett. B1998,426, 323–328
[53]

SU(2) calorons and magnetic monopoles.Phys

Lee, K.-M.; Lu, C. SU(2) calorons and magnetic monopoles.Phys. Rev. D1998,58, 025011
[54]

C.; van Baal, P

Kraan, T. C.; van Baal, P. Monopole constituents insideSU(n) calorons.Phys. Lett. B1998,435, 389–395
[55]

Periodic instantons with nontrivial holonomy.Nucl

Kraan, T.C.; van Baal, P. Periodic instantons with nontrivial holonomy.Nucl. Phys. B1998,533, 627–629
[56]

G.; Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, A.; Montero, A.; van Baal, P

P´ erez, M. G.; Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, A.; Montero, A.; van Baal, P. Calorons on the lattice: A new perspective.J. High Energy Phys.1999,06, 001

1999
[57]

Selfdual vortex-like configurations in SU(2) Yang–Mills theory.Phys

Gonz´ alez-Arroyo, A.; Montero, A. Selfdual vortex-like configurations in SU(2) Yang–Mills theory.Phys. Lett. B1998,442, 273–278
[58]

Study of SU(3) vortex-like configurations with a new maximal center gauge fixing method.Phys

Montero, A. Study of SU(3) vortex-like configurations with a new maximal center gauge fixing method.Phys. Lett. B1999, 467, 106–111
[59]

Vortex configurations in the largeNlimit.Phys

Montero, A. Vortex configurations in the largeNlimit.Phys. Lett. B2000,483, 309–314
[60]

Self-duality of ALE Ricci-flat 4-manifolds and positive mass theorem

Nakajima, H. Self-duality of ALE Ricci-flat 4-manifolds and positive mass theorem. InRecent Topics in Differential and Analytic Geometry; Ochiai, T., Ed.; Academic Press Inc.; Kinokuniya Company Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 1990; pp. 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-001018-9.50018-X

work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-001018-9.50018-x 1990
[61]

Topology of toric gravitational instantons.Diff

Nilsson, G. Topology of toric gravitational instantons.Diff. Geom. App.2024,96, 102171

2024
[62]

Existence and uniqueness of asymptotically flat toric gravitational instantons.Lett

Kunduri, H.K.; Lucietti, J. Existence and uniqueness of asymptotically flat toric gravitational instantons.Lett. Math. Phys. 2021,111, 133

2021
[63]

A Torelli type theorem for gravitational instantons.J

Kronheimer, P. A Torelli type theorem for gravitational instantons.J. Diff. Geom.1989,29, 685–697. https://doi.org/ 10.4310/jdg/1214443067

work page doi:10.4310/jdg/1214443067 1989
[64]

A Torelli type theorem for gravitational instantons.J

Kronheimer, P. The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-K¨ ahler quotient.J. Diff. Geom.1989,29, 665–683. https: //doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214443066

work page doi:10.4310/jdg/1214443066 1989
[65]

Quantum three-dimensional de Sitter space

Banados, M.; Brotz, T.; Ortiz, M.E. Quantum three-dimensional de Sitter space.Phys. Rev. D1999,59, 046002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.046002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.046002
[66]

Wave function of the quantum black hole

Brustein, R.; Hadad, M. Wave function of the quantum black hole.Phys. Lett. B2012,718, 653–656.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.10.074

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.10.074 2012
[67]

Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics.Canad

Dirac, P.A.M. Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics.Canad. J. Math.1950,2, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.4153/ CJM-1950-012-1

1950
[68]

Search for violations of quantum mechanics.Nucl

Ellis, J.R.; Hagelin, J.S.; Nanopoulos, D.V.; Srednicki, M. Search for violations of quantum mechanics.Nucl. Phys. B1984, 241, 381–405
[69]

Models & Searches of CPT Violation: a personal, very partial, list.EPJ Web Conf.2018,166, 00005

Mavromatos, N.E. Models & Searches of CPT Violation: a personal, very partial, list.EPJ Web Conf.2018,166, 00005. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201816600005

work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201816600005 2018
[70]

Limiting equivalence principle violation and long-range baryonic force from neutron–antineutron oscillation.Phys

Babu, K.S.; Mohapatra, R.N. Limiting equivalence principle violation and long-range baryonic force from neutron–antineutron oscillation.Phys. Rev. D2016,94, 054034.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.054034

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.054034
[71]

Neutron–antineutron transition as a test-bed for dynamical CPT violations.Int

Addazi, A. Neutron–antineutron transition as a test-bed for dynamical CPT violations.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2016,31, 1650084.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X16500846

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x16500846
[72]

Topological portals from matter to antimatter.Symmetry2022,14, 551

Addazi, A. Topological portals from matter to antimatter.Symmetry2022,14, 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/ sym14030551
[73]

Verlinde, E.P.; Zurek, K.M.arXiv, Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers.Phys. Lett. B2021, 822, 136663.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136663

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136663 2021
[74]

S.; Milburn, G.Phys

Bose, S.; Mazumdar, A.; Morley, G.W.; Ulbricht, H.; Toros, M.; Paternostro, M.; Geraci, A.; Barker, P.; Kim, M. S.; Milburn, G.Phys. Rev. Lett.2017,119, 240401

2017
[75]

Marletto, C.; Vedral, V.Phys. Rev. Lett.2017,119, 240402

2017
[76]

Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review.Prog

Addazi, A.; Alvarez-Muniz, J.; Alves Batista, R.; Amelino-Camelia, G.; Antonelli, V.; Arzano, M.; Asorey, M.; Atteia, J.L.; Bahamonde, S.; Bajardi, F.; et al. Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.2022,125, 103948.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103948. 17

work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103948 2022
[77]

White paper and roadmap for quantum gravity phenomenology in the multi-messenger era

Alves Batista, R.; Amelino-Camelia, G.; Boncioli, D.; Carmona, J.M.; di Matteo, A.; Gubitosi, G.; Lobo, I.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Pfeifer, C.; Rubiera-Garcia, D.; et al. White paper and roadmap for quantum gravity phenomenology in the multi-messenger era.Class. Quant. Grav.2025,42, 032001.https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad605a

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad605a 2025
[78]

Ng, Y. J. Selected Topics in Planck-Scale PhysicsMod. Phys. Lett. A2003,18, 1073–1097
[79]

An improved privacy and utility analysis of differentially private SGD with bounded domain and smooth losses.CoRR, abs/2502.17772:1–19, 2025

Hogan, C.J.arXiv, Holographic noise in interferometers.2009,arXiv, arXiv:0905.4803. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 0905.4803

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2009
[80]

Fluctuations of spacetime and holographic noise in atomic interferometry.Gen

G¨ okl¨ u, E.; L¨ ammerzahl, C. Fluctuations of spacetime and holographic noise in atomic interferometry.Gen. Rel. Grav.2011, 43, 2065–2088.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-010-1137-7

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1137-7 2011

Showing first 80 references.