arxiv: 2604.26721 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · physics.optics· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Fast, powerful, low-noise optical pumping of an atomic vapor with semiconductor optical amplifiers

Diana M\'endez-Avalos , Th\'eo Louzada Meireles , Morgan W. Mitchell , Aleksandra Sierant

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph physics.opticsquant-ph

keywords optically pumped magnetometersemiconductor optical amplifieratomic vaporoptical pumpingcoherence timesensitivityrubidiumfree induction decay

0 comments

The pith

A semiconductor optical amplifier for amplitude modulation enables higher power optical pumping of rubidium vapor without added noise, achieving environment-limited sensitivities of 80 fT per square root hertz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares three methods for generating pulsed optical pumping light for a rubidium atomic vapor used in an optically pumped magnetometer: frequency-modulated lasers, acousto-optic modulator amplitude modulation, and semiconductor optical amplifier amplitude modulation. With the same degree of spin polarization, the methods yield similar sensitivity in Bell-Bloom operation, showing that the SOA does not introduce extra noise despite being an active device. In free-induction-decay operation, the SOA method provides longer coherence times, and its higher available power allows reaching environment-limited sensitivities of 80 fT/sqrt(Hz) at 600 Hz and 200 fT/sqrt(Hz) at 4 kHz, one to two orders of magnitude better than the other methods.

Core claim

Using the higher power available from the SOA for amplitude-modulated pumping, the ensemble operates as a free-induction-decay OPM with an environment-limited sensitivity of 80 fT/sqrt(Hz) at 600 Hz and 200 fT/sqrt(Hz) at 4 kHz. This is one to two orders of magnitude beyond what was achievable with frequency-modulated or AOM-based pumping at equal spin polarization, while the SOA-AM method also yields longer unpumped coherence times.

What carries the argument

The semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) performing amplitude modulation on the optical pumping beam, enabling higher intensities without adding measurable noise to the atomic spin dynamics.

If this is right

The SOA-AM pumping strategy supports longer coherence times in free-induction decay OPMs compared to FM pumping.
Higher optical power from the SOA allows the magnetometer sensitivity to be limited by environmental factors rather than the pumping process.
The three pumping methods give equivalent performance when limited to the same spin polarization level in Bell-Bloom OPMs.
Semiconductor optical amplifiers can serve as low-noise, high-power alternatives for pulsed optical pumping in atomic sensors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This pumping approach could be combined with other techniques to further improve OPM performance in varying magnetic field conditions.
Similar benefits might appear in other applications of optical pumping, such as atomic clocks or quantum memory, where high power and low noise are needed.
Integration of SOA technology may facilitate miniaturization of high-sensitivity magnetometers for field use.

Load-bearing premise

The observed improvements in coherence time and sensitivity result specifically from the SOA-AM pumping method and its ability to deliver higher power, rather than from other unmentioned variations in the experimental apparatus or analysis.

What would settle it

Repeating the free-induction-decay measurements using FM or AOM pumping at the same high optical powers as the SOA and checking whether the sensitivity reaches the same 80 fT/sqrt(Hz) level at 600 Hz.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26721 by Aleksandra Sierant, Diana M\'endez-Avalos, Morgan W. Mitchell, Th\'eo Louzada Meireles.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: A 3 cm-long glass cell containing isotopically enriched 87Rb and 100 torr of N2 buffer gas is heated to 105 ◦C to achieve an atomic density of 8.2 × 1012 atoms/cm3 . A constant magnetic field along the xaxis is generated using a low-noise current source (Twinleaf CSUA300). A linearly-polarized probe beam, propagating along z axis, detuned by 20 GHz to the blue of the 87Rb D1 transition experiences Fara… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) BOA characterization setup. A waveform gen view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of Faraday-rotation noise properties with FM and SOA-AM pumping modulation strategies. (a) SOA view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetic-field sensitivity for BB-OPM, calculated view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We use a $^{87}\text{Rb}$ atomic vapor, suitable for an optically-pumped magnetometer (OPM) in Earth-field conditions, to study the noise properties of three strategies for generating pulsed optical pumping. We compare a frequency-modulated (FM) laser, amplitude modulation (AM) via an acousto-optic modulator (AOM), and amplitude modulation via a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA). Pumping the ensemble to operate as a Bell-Bloom OPM, and with an equal degree of spin polarization, the three methods give nearly identical sensitivity, showing that the SOA, despite being an active device, can introduce negligible additional noise. Pumping the ensemble to operate as a free-induction-decay OPM, we observe longer unpumped coherence times with the SOA-AM method than with the FM method. Finally, using the higher power available from the SOA, we demonstrate an environment-limited sensitivity of $80\text{fT}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ at $600\text{Hz}$ and 200fT$200\text{fT}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$ at $4\text{kHz}$, one to two orders of magnitude beyond what was achievable with the other pumping methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SOA amplitude modulation matches FM and AOM on noise at equal polarization but delivers one-to-two-order sensitivity gains in this Rb OPM via higher available power.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that SOA-AM pumping for this 87Rb vapor OPM performs essentially the same as FM or AOM methods on sensitivity when spin polarization is held fixed, yet the extra optical power from the SOA pushes the device into an environment-limited regime with reported sensitivities of 80 fT/sqrt(Hz) at 600 Hz and 200 fT/sqrt(Hz) at 4 kHz. That is the concrete advance over prior pumping approaches in the same apparatus. They also note longer unpumped coherence times in free-induction-decay mode with the SOA method compared to FM. The side-by-side comparisons in one setup are the right way to isolate the effect, and the equal-polarization control directly addresses whether the active SOA adds noise. The numbers line up with the power increase rather than some hidden variable, which makes the environment-limited claim hold up. The work is straightforward experimental atomic physics with quantitative results tied to the measurements. Minor soft spots include wanting a bit more explicit detail on how polarization equality was verified across methods and on the precise power levels in each run, but these are not load-bearing. The central comparisons and sensitivity figures appear internally consistent and reproducible from the description. This paper is aimed at people building or optimizing Earth-field OPMs and related atomic sensors. Anyone working on practical magnetometry or low-noise optical pumping will find the direct method comparison useful. It deserves peer review because the experimental design is clean, the controls are appropriate, and the result is actionable for applications without relying on unverified modeling.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally compares three strategies for pulsed optical pumping of a 87Rb atomic vapor in an optically-pumped magnetometer (OPM) under Earth-field conditions: frequency-modulated (FM) laser, amplitude modulation (AM) via acousto-optic modulator (AOM), and AM via semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA). With equal spin polarization, the methods produce nearly identical sensitivities, demonstrating that the SOA introduces negligible additional noise. In free-induction-decay operation, SOA-AM yields longer unpumped coherence times than FM. Using the higher available SOA power, environment-limited sensitivities of 80 fT/√Hz at 600 Hz and 200 fT/√Hz at 4 kHz are reported, one to two orders of magnitude better than the other methods.

Significance. If the results hold, the work shows that SOA-AM provides a practical, low-noise, high-power pumping option for OPMs that achieves environment-limited performance without the noise penalties sometimes associated with active devices. This is supported by direct side-by-side comparisons at matched polarization and the quantitative sensitivity figures, offering a compact route to improved magnetometer performance in applications such as geophysical sensing where higher optical power is advantageous.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the sensitivity value is written as '200fT200 fT/√Hz'; this typographical error should be corrected to '200 fT/√Hz'.
[Results] The manuscript would benefit from a summary table (perhaps in §4 or §5) listing coherence times, sensitivities, and polarization levels for all three methods under matched conditions to facilitate direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the summary of our experimental comparisons between FM, AOM-AM, and SOA-AM pumping strategies, and for recognizing the significance of achieving environment-limited sensitivities with the SOA approach. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely experimental results

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study comparing three optical pumping methods (FM, AOM-AM, SOA-AM) in a 87Rb vapor for OPM use. It reports direct measurements of sensitivity, noise, and coherence times under controlled conditions with equal spin polarization, without any derivations, equations, predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. Claims such as the 80 fT/sqrt(Hz) sensitivity follow from the reported data and side-by-side comparisons, not from any reduction to fitted parameters or prior author results by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is experimental and relies on standard atomic-physics models for Rb-87 vapor and OPM operation; no new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard quantum optics and atomic physics apply to the 87Rb vapor and its interaction with the pumping light.
Invoked to interpret spin polarization, coherence times, and magnetometer sensitivity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1152 out tokens · 33993 ms · 2026-05-07T12:30:42.068131+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Fast, powerful, low-noise optical pumping of an atomic vapor with semiconductor optical amplifiers

employ stroboscopic optical pumping, i.e., pump- ing with low duty-cycle pulses spaced by one Larmor period. At the∼500 kHz Larmor frequencies typical of Earth-field operation, this requires sub-µs pulse du- rations. With sufficient pumping, it is also possible to reach the so-called light-narrowing regime [34–36], which boosts coherence time and sensitiv...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

A microfab- ricated atomic clock,

S. Knappe, V. Shah, P. D. Schwindt, L. Hollberg, J. Kitching, L. A. Liew, and J. Moreland, “A microfab- ricated atomic clock,” Applied Physics Letters85, 1460 (2004)

2004
[3]

Atomic vapor cells for chip-scale atomic clocks with improved long-term frequency stability,

S. Knappe, V. Gerginov, P. D. Schwindt, V. Shah, H. G. Robinson, L. Hollberg, and J. Kitching, “Atomic vapor cells for chip-scale atomic clocks with improved long-term frequency stability,” Opt. Lett.30, 2351 (2005). 6

2005
[4]

Improving short-term stability in optical lat- tice clocks by quantum nondemolition measurement,

D. B. Orenes, R. J. Sewell, J. Lodewyck, and M. W. Mitchell, “Improving short-term stability in optical lat- tice clocks by quantum nondemolition measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 153201 (2022)

2022
[5]

Huang,Spin squeezing and spin dynamics in a trapped-atom clock, Theses, Sorbonne Universit´ e (2019)

M.-Z. Huang,Spin squeezing and spin dynamics in a trapped-atom clock, Theses, Sorbonne Universit´ e (2019)

2019
[6]

Towards high- speed optical quantum memories,

K. Reim, J. Nunn, V. Lorenz, B. Sussman, K. Lee, N. Langford, D. Jaksch, and I. Walmsley, “Towards high- speed optical quantum memories,” Nature Photonics4, 218 (2010)

2010
[7]

Long-lived quan- tum memory,

R. Zhao, Y. Dudin, S. Jenkins, C. Campbell, D. Matsuke- vich, T. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, “Long-lived quan- tum memory,” Nature Physics5, 100 (2009)

2009
[8]

Efficient optical pumping and high optical depth in a hollow-core photonic-crystal fibre for a broadband quantum mem- ory,

M. R. Sprague, D. G. England, A. Abdolvand, J. Nunn, X.-M. Jin, W. Steven Kolthammer, M. Barbieri, B. Ri- gal, P. S. Michelberger, T. F. Champion,et al., “Efficient optical pumping and high optical depth in a hollow-core photonic-crystal fibre for a broadband quantum mem- ory,” New Journal of Physics15, 055013 (2013)

2013
[9]

Optical quantum memory,

A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, “Optical quantum memory,” Nature photonics3, 706 (2009)

2009
[10]

Medical imaging with laser polarized noble gases,

T. Chupp and S. Swanson, “Medical imaging with laser polarized noble gases,” Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys45, 1 (2000)

2000
[11]

Metastability exchange optical pumping of 3He at high pressure and high magnetic field for medical ap- plications,

A. Nikiel, T. Palasz, M. Suchanek, M. Abboud, A. Sina- tra, Z. Olejniczak, T. Dohnalik, G. Tastevin, and P.-J. Nacher, “Metastability exchange optical pumping of 3He at high pressure and high magnetic field for medical ap- plications,” The European Physical Journal Special Top- ics144, 255 (2007)

2007
[12]

A high- field 3He metastability exchange optical pumping polar- izer operating in a 1.5 T medical scanner for lung mag- netic resonance imaging,

G. Collier, T. Pa lasz, A. Wojna, B. G lowacz, M. Suchanek, Z. Olejniczak, and T. Dohnalik, “A high- field 3He metastability exchange optical pumping polar- izer operating in a 1.5 T medical scanner for lung mag- netic resonance imaging,” Journal of Applied Physics 113(2013)

2013
[13]

A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magne- tometer,

I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis, “A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magne- tometer,” Nature422, 596 (2003)

2003
[14]

High-sensitivity atomic magnetometer unaf- fected by spin-exchange relaxation,

J. C. Allred, R. N. Lyman, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, “High-sensitivity atomic magnetometer unaf- fected by spin-exchange relaxation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 130801 (2002)

2002
[15]

Free-induction-decay magne- tometer based on a microfabricated cs vapor cell,

D. Hunter, S. Piccolomo, J. D. Pritchard, N. L. Brockie, T. E. Dyer, and E. Riis, “Free-induction-decay magne- tometer based on a microfabricated cs vapor cell,” Phys- ical Review Applied10, 014002 (2018)

2018
[16]

High-bandwidth optical magnetometer,

R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, W. C. Griffith, S. Knappe, J. Kitching, and M. Prouty, “High-bandwidth optical magnetometer,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B29, 3398 (2012)

2012
[17]

Sub-picotesla widely tunable atomic magnetometer operating at room- temperature in unshielded environments,

C. Deans, L. Marmugi, and F. Renzoni, “Sub-picotesla widely tunable atomic magnetometer operating at room- temperature in unshielded environments,” Rev. Sci. In- strum.89, 083111 (2018)

2018
[18]

Multichannel optical atomic magne- tometer operating in unshielded environment,

G. Bevilacqua, V. Biancalana, P. Chessa, and Y. Dancheva, “Multichannel optical atomic magne- tometer operating in unshielded environment,” Applied Physics B122, 103 (2016)

2016
[19]

Miniature atomic scalar magnetometer for space based on the rubidium isotope 87rb,

H. Korth, K. Strohbehn, F. Tejada, A. G. Andreou, J. Kitching, S. Knappe, S. J. Lehtonen, S. M. London, and M. Kafel, “Miniature atomic scalar magnetometer for space based on the rubidium isotope 87rb,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics121, 7870 (2016)

2016
[20]

A multi-pass optically pumped rubidium atomic mag- netometer with free induction decay,

L. Zhang, Y. Yang, N. Zhao, J. He, and J. Wang, “A multi-pass optically pumped rubidium atomic mag- netometer with free induction decay,” Sensors22, 7598 (2022)

2022
[21]

Sensitivity comparison of mx and frequency-modulated bell-bloom cs magnetometers in a microfabricated cell,

R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, W. C. Griffith, Y. J. Wang, S. Knappe, J. Kitching, K. Smith, and M. D. Prouty, “Sensitivity comparison of mx and frequency-modulated bell-bloom cs magnetometers in a microfabricated cell,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measure- ment59, 372 (2010)

2010
[22]

Suppression of heading errors in bell- bloom optically pumped free-induction-decay alkali- metal atomic magnetometers,

S. Q. Liu, X. K. Wang, X. D. Zhang, W. Xiao, and D. Sheng, “Suppression of heading errors in bell- bloom optically pumped free-induction-decay alkali- metal atomic magnetometers,” Physical Review A111 (2025), 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.023119

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.023119 2025
[23]

All-optical atomic mag- netometry using an elliptically polarized amplitude- modulated light wave,

A. Makarov, K. Kozlova, D. Brazhnikov, V. Vish- nyakov, and A. Goncharov, “All-optical atomic mag- netometry using an elliptically polarized amplitude- modulated light wave,” Optics Communications577 (2025), 10.1016/j.optcom.2024.131369

work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2024.131369 2025
[24]

How to build a magnetometer with thermal atomic vapor: a tutorial,

A. Fabricant, I. Novikova, and G. Bison, “How to build a magnetometer with thermal atomic vapor: a tutorial,” New Journal of Physics25, 025001 (2023)

2023
[25]

Fem- totesla direct magnetic gradiometer using a single multi- pass cell,

V. Lucivero, W. Lee, N. Dural, and M. Romalis, “Fem- totesla direct magnetic gradiometer using a single multi- pass cell,” Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 014004 (2021)

2021
[26]

Femtotesla nearly-quantum- noise-limited pulsed gradiometer at earth-scale fields,

V. Lucivero, W. Lee, M. Limes, E. Foley, T. Kor- nack, and M. Romalis, “Femtotesla nearly-quantum- noise-limited pulsed gradiometer at earth-scale fields,” Phys. Rev. Appl.18, L021001 (2022)

2022
[27]

Precision magnetometers for aerospace applications: A review,

J. S. Bennett, B. E. Vyhnalek, H. Greenall, E. M. Bridge, F. Gotardo, S. Forstner, G. I. Harris, F. A. Mi- randa, and W. P. Bowen, “Precision magnetometers for aerospace applications: A review,” Sensors21(2021), 10.3390/s21165568

work page doi:10.3390/s21165568 2021
[28]

Swarm – an earth observation mission investi- gating geospace,

E. Friis-Christensen, H. L¨ uhr, D. Knudsen, and R. Haag- mans, “Swarm – an earth observation mission investi- gating geospace,” Advances in Space Research41, 210 (2008)

2008
[29]

Nanomagsat sta- tus: a 3x16u low-earth orbit constellation to monitor the earth magnetic field and the ionospheric environment,

F. Deconinck, G. Hulot, J.-M. L´ eger, L. B. Clausen, M. Pastena, J.-P. Lejault, J. Wilkinson, D. M. Caballero, M. V. Tostado, P. Co¨ ısson,et al., “Nanomagsat sta- tus: a 3x16u low-earth orbit constellation to monitor the earth magnetic field and the ionospheric environment,” inSmall Satellites Systems and Services Symposium (4S 2024), Vol. 13546 (SPIE, ...

2024
[30]

Quantum- assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accu- racy better than a strategic-grade ins in airborne and ground-based field trials,

M. Muradoglu, M. T. Johnsson, N. M. Wilson, Y. Co- hen, D. Shin, T. Navickas, T. Pyragius, D. Thomas, D. Thompson, S. I. Moore, M. T. Rahman, A. Walker, I. Dutta, S. Bijjahalli, J. Berlocher, M. R. Hush, R. P. Anderson, S. S. Szigeti, and M. J. Biercuk, “Quantum- assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accu- racy better than a strategic-grade ins...

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Optically pumped vector magnetometer using a strong bias magnetic field,

T. Sch¨ onau, T. Scholtes, F. Wittk¨ amper, A. Sekels, S. Hiebel, G. Oelsner, and R. Stolz, “Optically pumped vector magnetometer using a strong bias magnetic field,” Physical Review Applied23, 024006 (2025)

2025
[32]

Squeezed-light enhancement and backaction evasion in a high sensitivity optically pumped magnetometer,

C. Troullinou, R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, J. Kong, V. Lu- civero, and M. Mitchell, “Squeezed-light enhancement and backaction evasion in a high sensitivity optically pumped magnetometer,” Physical Review Letters127, 193601 (2021). 7

2021
[33]

Quantum noise scaling in continuously oper- ating multiparameter sensors,

A. Sierant, D. M´ endez-Avalos, S. T. Giraldo, and M. W. Mitchell, “Quantum noise scaling in continuously oper- ating multiparameter sensors,” (2026), arXiv:2602.05991 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[34]

Free-induction-decay magnetic field imaging with a microfabricated cs vapor cell,

D. Hunter, C. Perrella, A. McWilliam, J. P. McGilligan, M. Mrozowski, S. J. Ingleby, P. F. Griffin, D. Burt, A. N. Luiten, and E. Riis, “Free-induction-decay magnetic field imaging with a microfabricated cs vapor cell,” Optics Ex- press31, 33582 (2023)

2023
[35]

Light narrowing of rubidium magnetic- resonance lines in high-pressure optical-pumping cells,

S. Appelt, A. Ben-Amar Baranga, A. R. Young, and W. Happer, “Light narrowing of rubidium magnetic- resonance lines in high-pressure optical-pumping cells,” Phys. Rev. A59, 2078 (1999)

2078
[36]

Light-narrowed parametric resonance magne- tometer with the fundamental sensitivity beyond the spin-exchange limit,

G. Zhang, H. Zeng, R. Guo, Q. Zhang, W. Yu, and Q. Lin, “Light-narrowed parametric resonance magne- tometer with the fundamental sensitivity beyond the spin-exchange limit,” Optics Letters48, 4793 (2023)

2023
[37]

Compact, high-sensitivity atomic magnetometer utilizing the light- narrowing effect and in-phase excitation,

Y. Guo, S. Wan, X. Sun, and J. Qin, “Compact, high-sensitivity atomic magnetometer utilizing the light- narrowing effect and in-phase excitation,” Applied Optics 58, 734 (2019)

2019
[38]

Optically driven spin pre- cession,

W. E. Bell and A. L. Bloom, “Optically driven spin pre- cession,” Physical Review Letters6, 280 (1961)

1961
[39]

Multiparameter quantum sensing and magnetic commu- nication with a hybrid dc and rf optically pumped mag- netometer,

M. Lipka, A. Sierant, C. Troullinou, and M. W. Mitchell, “Multiparameter quantum sensing and magnetic commu- nication with a hybrid dc and rf optically pumped mag- netometer,” Physical Review Applied21, 034054 (2024)

2024
[40]

Study of the optimal duty cycle and pumping rate for square-wave amplitude-modulated bell–bloom mag- netometers,

M.-L. Wang, M.-B. Wang, G.-Y. Zhang, and K.-F. Zhao, “Study of the optimal duty cycle and pumping rate for square-wave amplitude-modulated bell–bloom mag- netometers,” Chinese Physics B25, 060701 (2016)

2016
[41]

High-bandwidth optical magnetometer,

R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, W. C. Griffith, S. Knappe, J. Kitching, and M. Prouty, “High-bandwidth optical magnetometer,” Journal of the Optical Society of Amer- ica B29, 3398 (2012)

2012
[42]

A bell-bloom experiment with polarization-modulated light of arbitrary duty cycle,

I. Fescenko, P. Knowles, A. Weis, and E. Breschi, “A bell-bloom experiment with polarization-modulated light of arbitrary duty cycle,” Optics express21, 15121 (2013)

2013
[43]

Switching, amplifying, and chirping diode lasers with current pulses for high bandwidth quan- tum technologies,

G. Buser, “Switching, amplifying, and chirping diode lasers with current pulses for high bandwidth quan- tum technologies,” Review of Scientific Instruments95 (2024), 10.1063/5.0230870

work page doi:10.1063/5.0230870 2024
[44]

Budker and D

D. Budker and D. F. J. Kimball,Optical Magnetometry, Vol. 37 (2013)

2013
[45]

Measurement- induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system,

J. Kong, R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, C. Troullinou, V. G. Lu- civero, G. T´ oth, and M. W. Mitchell, “Measurement- induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system,” Nature Communi- cations11(2020), 10.1038/s41467-020-15899-1

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15899-1 2020
[46]

S. J. Seltzer,Developments in Alkali-Metal Atomic Mag- netometry, Ph.D. thesis (2008)

2008
[47]

Optical frequency generation using fiber bragg grating filters for applications in portable quantum sensing,

C. D. Macrae, K. Bongs, and M. Holynski, “Optical frequency generation using fiber bragg grating filters for applications in portable quantum sensing,” Optics letters 46, 1257 (2021)

2021
[48]

Response of an optical cavity to phase-controlled incom- plete power switching of nearly resonant incident light,

S. W´ ojtewicz, A. Cygan, J. Domys lawska, K. Bielska, P. Morzy´ nski, P. Mas lowski, R. Ciury lo, and D. Lisak, “Response of an optical cavity to phase-controlled incom- plete power switching of nearly resonant incident light,” Optics Express26, 5644 (2018)

2018
[49]

Sensitivity, quantum limits, and quantum enhancement of noise spectroscopies,

V. G. Lucivero, A. Dimic, J. Kong, R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, and M. W. Mitchell, “Sensitivity, quantum limits, and quantum enhancement of noise spectroscopies,” Physical Review A95, 041803 (2017)

2017
[50]

Effects of spin- exchange collisions on the fluctuation spectra of hot alkali-metal vapors,

K. Mouloudakis, G. Vasilakis, V. G. Lucivero, J. Kong, I. K. Kominis, and M. W. Mitchell, “Effects of spin- exchange collisions on the fluctuation spectra of hot alkali-metal vapors,” Phys. Rev. A106, 023112 (2022)

2022
[51]

Anomalous noise spectra in a spin-exchange- relaxation-free alkali-metal vapor,

K. Mouloudakis, J. Kong, A. Sierant, E. Arkin, M. Hern´ andez Ruiz, R. Jim´ enez-Mart´ ınez, and M. W. Mitchell, “Anomalous noise spectra in a spin-exchange- relaxation-free alkali-metal vapor,” Phys. Rev. A109, L040802 (2024)

2024
[52]

CSBA low noise bipolar current supply,

Twinleaf, “CSBA low noise bipolar current supply,” (2026), accessed: 2026-03-06

2026