pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26958 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI

Designing Ethical Learning for Agentic AI: Toegye Yi Hwang's Ethical Emotion Regulation Framework

Ji Yeon Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AI
keywords agentic AIethical emotion regulationToegye Yi Hwangmoral-emotional alignmentAI learning designfeedback systemethical AIevaluation instrument
0
0 comments X

The pith

Toegye Yi Hwang's moral-emotional philosophy can be reconstructed as a five-stage Ethical Emotion Feedback System to regulate moral emotions across agentic AI decision cycles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reconstructs an ancient Korean philosopher's framework on ethical emotions into a practical architecture for modern autonomous AI. It claims this five-stage system aligns normative guidance with the full cycle of goal-setting and intervention rather than treating emotion as mere reactive input. Stage-specific design principles and scenario classifications give designers concrete tools for each part of the process. An evaluation instrument is added to check moral-emotional alignment systematically. A reader would care because agentic AI systems make independent choices that existing emotion-handling methods do not address with ongoing ethical standards.

Core claim

The Ethical Emotion Feedback System is reconstructed as a five-stage architecture aligned with agentic cycles, articulating stage-specific design principles and scenario classifications. An EEFS Evaluation Instrument is introduced to enable systematic assessment of moral-emotional alignment in agentic AI systems.

What carries the argument

The Ethical Emotion Feedback System (EEFS), a five-stage architecture that maps moral-emotional regulation onto the autonomous decision cycles of agentic AI.

If this is right

  • Designers gain stage-specific principles to embed ethical emotion regulation at each point in an AI's goal-setting and intervention cycle.
  • Scenario classifications let teams anticipate moral-emotional issues tied to particular phases of autonomous operation.
  • The EEFS Evaluation Instrument supplies a repeatable method for measuring alignment between AI behavior and moral-emotional standards.
  • Emotion handling in AI shifts from reactive optimization to normative regulation sustained across full decision cycles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reconstruction approach could be tested on other historical ethical traditions to generate alternative AI regulation templates.
  • If the stages prove workable, they might extend to non-learning agentic tasks such as planning or resource allocation.
  • Real deployment would likely require adjustments for cultural context and empirical validation of the five stages.
  • The framework points toward broader use of philosophical systems as structured scaffolds for AI alignment problems.

Load-bearing premise

That Toegye Yi Hwang's moral-emotional philosophy can be directly reconstructed and applied to the design of learning environments for modern agentic AI systems without significant loss of meaning or cultural mismatch.

What would settle it

A test showing that agentic AI systems built with the five-stage EEFS principles achieve no better moral-emotional alignment than those using standard reactive emotion frameworks would falsify the reconstruction's practical utility.

read the original abstract

Agentic AI systems capable of autonomous goal setting and proactive intervention introduce new challenges for regulating moral-emotional processes in learning environments. Existing frameworks typically treat emotion as reactive feedback or engagement optimization, overlooking the need for normative regulation across autonomous decision cycles.This paper proposes an ethical emotion regulation framework for agentic AI learning design inspired by Toegye Yi Hwang's moral-emotional philosophy. The Ethical Emotion Feedback System (EEFS) is reconstructed as a five-stage architecture aligned with agentic cycles, articulating stage-specific design principles and scenario classifications.An EEFS Evaluation Instrument is introduced to enable systematic assessment of moral-emotional alignment in agentic AI systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Ethical Emotion Feedback System (EEFS), a five-stage architecture for ethical emotion regulation in agentic AI learning environments, reconstructed from Toegye Yi Hwang's moral-emotional philosophy. It aligns the stages with agentic cycles (goal-setting, intervention, learning), articulates stage-specific design principles and scenario classifications, and introduces an EEFS Evaluation Instrument to enable systematic assessment of moral-emotional alignment in agentic AI systems.

Significance. If the reconstruction preserves the original philosophical meaning with high fidelity and the evaluation instrument can be operationalized, the work could offer a distinctive normative contribution to AI ethics by shifting from reactive emotion models to proactive, culturally grounded regulation across autonomous decision cycles. It explicitly credits the introduction of a structured evaluation instrument as a step toward falsifiable assessment in this domain.

major comments (2)
  1. [Framework Reconstruction (post-abstract section)] The central reconstruction of Toegye Yi Hwang's philosophy into the five-stage EEFS (detailed in the framework description following the abstract) provides no derivation steps, direct original-text citations, or fidelity checks demonstrating that the stages and design principles follow from the source rather than being retrofitted to modern agentic AI terminology. This mapping is load-bearing for the paper's claim of philosophical grounding and must be strengthened with explicit textual evidence.
  2. [EEFS Evaluation Instrument] The EEFS Evaluation Instrument is introduced to enable systematic assessment, yet the manuscript supplies no pilot data, reliability metrics, or validation against existing ethical AI benchmarks. Without these, the instrument's claimed utility for measuring moral-emotional alignment remains untested and cannot support the paper's assessment goals.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly separate the interpretive reconstruction of Toegye's concepts from the novel application to agentic AI cycles to avoid conflating historical fidelity with design innovation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these constructive comments, which identify key areas where the manuscript's claims can be more rigorously supported. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested strengthening.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Framework Reconstruction (post-abstract section)] The central reconstruction of Toegye Yi Hwang's philosophy into the five-stage EEFS (detailed in the framework description following the abstract) provides no derivation steps, direct original-text citations, or fidelity checks demonstrating that the stages and design principles follow from the source rather than being retrofitted to modern agentic AI terminology. This mapping is load-bearing for the paper's claim of philosophical grounding and must be strengthened with explicit textual evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the reconstruction requires explicit textual grounding to avoid any appearance of retrofitting. The current manuscript references Toegye's major works (e.g., the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning and his letters on moral cultivation) and aligns the five stages with his concepts of kyŏng (reverence) and the regulation of the four-seven emotions. In the revision we will add a new subsection that provides (1) direct quotations from primary sources in both Korean and English translation, (2) step-by-step derivation showing how each EEFS stage maps onto specific passages in Toegye's corpus, and (3) fidelity checks against established secondary scholarship (e.g., Kalton, 1988; Ro, 1989). These additions will demonstrate that the architecture follows from Toegye's cyclical model of moral-emotional development rather than being imposed by contemporary agentic-AI terminology. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [EEFS Evaluation Instrument] The EEFS Evaluation Instrument is introduced to enable systematic assessment, yet the manuscript supplies no pilot data, reliability metrics, or validation against existing ethical AI benchmarks. Without these, the instrument's claimed utility for measuring moral-emotional alignment remains untested and cannot support the paper's assessment goals.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript presents the EEFS Evaluation Instrument as a conceptual contribution without accompanying empirical validation. As the paper is primarily theoretical, the instrument is described with item examples, scoring rubrics, and alignment to the five EEFS stages, but no pilot data or psychometric metrics are included. In the revision we will (1) add an explicit limitations subsection stating that full validation (pilot testing, reliability coefficients, and benchmarking against instruments such as the Moral Foundations Questionnaire or AI ethics checklists) constitutes planned future work, and (2) expand the operationalization section with additional example items and administration guidelines to facilitate independent validation by others. This clarifies the instrument's current status while preserving its utility as a proposed assessment framework. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework is an interpretive reconstruction, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper presents EEFS as a reconstruction of Toegye Yi Hwang's philosophy aligned with agentic AI cycles, introducing design principles and an evaluation instrument as new contributions. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the provided text that would reduce any claim to its own inputs by construction. The five-stage structure is explicitly described as aligned with modern agentic cycles rather than derived tautologically from the source, and the work is framed as inspirational proposal rather than a closed logical loop. This is a standard interpretive application paper with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal depends on interpretive reconstruction of a historical philosophical source into a modern technical architecture; this introduces the EEFS as a new organizing entity while relying on an untested domain assumption about cross-era applicability.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Toegye Yi Hwang's moral-emotional philosophy supplies principles that can be faithfully reconstructed into a normative framework for regulating emotions in autonomous AI decision cycles.
    The entire EEFS architecture and design principles are derived from this source as the inspirational and structural foundation.
invented entities (1)
  • Ethical Emotion Feedback System (EEFS) no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide a five-stage architecture aligned with agentic AI cycles for ethical emotion regulation, including design principles and an evaluation instrument.
    Newly constructed in the paper as the central deliverable; no independent evidence of its functional validity or predictive power is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1607 out tokens · 53458 ms · 2026-05-10T19:38:44.155240+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ibal — Design-Time Constraint: Before initiating any goal-directed behavior, the system activates a set of ethical principles that constrain the permissible space of goals and interventions. These include dignity (safeguarding learner self- esteem and avoiding shame), fairness (ensuring equitable support regardless of learner characteristics), care (balan...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Feedback should remain encouraging and authentic while avoiding extremes such as over-praising or emotional detachment

    Gisu — System Behavior Layer: Once these ethical parameters are activated, the system generates emotional responses guided by them rather than optimized solely for engagement or task efficiency. Feedback should remain encouraging and authentic while avoiding extremes such as over-praising or emotional detachment. This layer transforms computationally gene...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Ye — Social Alignment Mechanism: Emotional expressions are calibrated according to relational and cultural context, including learner background, interpersonal history, and the learner’s current emotional state. A motivational message that benefits one learner may overwhelm another; therefore, this mechanism dynamically adjusts valence, intensity, and ton...

    work page

  4. [4]

    It examines potential risks of emotional harm, respect for learner autonomy, contextual appropriateness, and coherence with Ibal’s ethical framework

    Gyeong — Meta-Cognitive Loop: Before finalizing an emotional response, the system performs meta-cognitive self- evaluation to assess alignment with ethical constraints. It examines potential risks of emotional harm, respect for learner autonomy, contextual appropriateness, and coherence with Ibal’s ethical framework. If concerns are detected, the system r...

    work page

  5. [5]

    I'm terrible at math. I give up

    Junghwa — Temporal Ethical Equilibrium: Through the continuous circulation of ethical activation, behavioral regulation, self-reflection, and contextual calibration, the system sustains long-term ethical equilibrium. Drawing on Toegye’s conception of Deok (덕, 德) as dynamic moral balance, the system monitors longitudinal consistency across interactions, id...

    work page

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20082 , year=

    F. Kamalov, "Evolution of AI in Education: Agentic Workflows," arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20082, 2025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.20082

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.20082 2025

  7. [7]

    Agentic AI in Education: State of the Art and Future Directions,

    G. Kostopoulos et al., "Agentic AI in Education: State of the Art and Future Directions," IEEE Access, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Agentic AI: Autonomous Intelligence for Complex Goals—A comprehensive survey,

    D. B. Acharya, K. Kuppan, and B. Divya, "Agentic AI: Autonomous Intelligence for Complex Goals—A comprehensive survey," IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 18912–18936, 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Sheth, A

    T. Raheem and G. Hossain, "Agentic AI Systems: Opportunities, Challenges, and Trustworthiness," in 2025 IEEE Int. Conf. Electro Inf. Technol. (eIT), Valparaiso, IN, USA, 2025, pp. 618–624, doi: 10.1109/eIT64391.2025.11103638

    work page doi:10.1109/eit64391.2025.11103638 2025

  10. [10]

    The Cyclical Ethical Effects of Using Artificial Intelligence in Education,

    E. Dieterle, C. Dede, and M. Walker, "The Cyclical Ethical Effects of Using Artificial Intelligence in Education," AI & Society, vol. 39, pp. 633–643, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01497-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01497-w 2024

  11. [11]

    The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,

    A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, "The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines," Nature Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 2019

  12. [12]

    Multimodality of AI for Education: Toward Artificial General Intelligence,

    G. Lee et al., "Multimodality of AI for Education: Toward Artificial General Intelligence," IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 18, pp. 666–683, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2025.3574466. 10

    work page doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3574466 2025

  13. [13]

    Towards Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation Systems,

    Y. Chu, L. Liao, Z. Zhou, C.-W. Ngo, and R. Hong, "Towards Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation Systems," IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 27, pp. 8276–8287, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TMM.2025.3604951

    work page doi:10.1109/tmm.2025.3604951 2025

  14. [14]

    Digital Confucius and Virtuous AI: Confucianism in the Age of AI and Robotics,

    B. Seok, "Digital Confucius and Virtuous AI: Confucianism in the Age of AI and Robotics," J. Confucian Philos. Culture, vol. 42, pp. 5–17, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.22916/jcpc.2024..42.5

    work page doi:10.22916/jcpc.2024..42.5 2024

  15. [15]

    Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology,

    P.-H. Wong, "Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology," Philosophy & Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 67–86, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s13347-011-0021-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0021-z 2012

  16. [16]

    Building Trust in AI Through Dialogues With Eastern Ethics: Toward Ethical Partnerships in Education,

    J. C.-K. Lee, C. Dede, M. Wang, and X. Li, "Building Trust in AI Through Dialogues With Eastern Ethics: Toward Ethical Partnerships in Education," IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 18, pp. 833–841, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2025.3604616

    work page doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3604616 2025

  17. [17]

    The Philosophical Role of Toegye's Theory of Emotion in AI Ethics (AI 윤리에 대한 퇴계 감정론의 철학적 역할),

    S. Han, "The Philosophical Role of Toegye's Theory of Emotion in AI Ethics (AI 윤리에 대한 퇴계 감정론의 철학적 역할)," Toegyehak Nonjip, vol. 37, pp. 33–69, 2025, doi: 10.33213/THLJ.2025.0.37.33

    work page doi:10.33213/thlj.2025.0.37.33 2025

  18. [18]

    Kalton, The Four-Seven Debate: An Annotated Translation of the Most Famous Controversy in Korean Neo-Confucian Thought

    M. Kalton, The Four-Seven Debate: An Annotated Translation of the Most Famous Controversy in Korean Neo-Confucian Thought. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994

    work page 1994

  19. [19]

    The Four-Seven Debate on Emotions: Moral-Spiritual Meaning and Implication,

    E. Y. J. Chung, “The Four-Seven Debate on Emotions: Moral-Spiritual Meaning and Implication,” in The Moral and Religious Thought of Yi Hwang (Toegye): A Study of Korean Neo-Confucian Ethics and Spirituality. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, pp. 53–65, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77924-5_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77924-5_4 2021

  20. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14825 (2025)

    L. Yan, "From Passive Tool to Socio-cognitive Teammate: A Conceptual Framework for Agentic AI in Human-AI Collaborative Learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14825, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Exploring the Role of Agentic AI in Fostering Self-Efficacy, Autonomy Support, and Self-Learning Motivation in Higher Education,

    J. Alqurni, "Exploring the Role of Agentic AI in Fostering Self-Efficacy, Autonomy Support, and Self-Learning Motivation in Higher Education," Frontiers Artif. Intell., vol. 9, 1738774, 2026, doi: 10.3389/frai.2026.1738774

    work page doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1738774 2026

  22. [22]

    Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications,

    R. A. Calvo and S. D'Mello, "Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications," IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–37, 2010

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion from Human Facial Movements,

    L. F. Barrett, R. Adolphs, S. Marsella, A. M. Martinez, and S. D. Pollak, "Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion from Human Facial Movements," Psychol. Sci. Public Interest, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–68, 2019

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    The Ethics of Emotion in Artificial Intelligence Systems,

    L. Stark and J. Hoey, "The Ethics of Emotion in Artificial Intelligence Systems," in Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2021, pp. 782–793, doi: 10.1145/3442188.3445939

    work page doi:10.1145/3442188.3445939 2021

  25. [25]

    Stud ent Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions

    H. Zhang, Y. Liu, M. Jiang, J. Chen, M. Wang, and F. Paas, "Emotional Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis," Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 37, 106, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10648- 025-10086-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10648- 2025

  26. [26]

    Integrating Artificial Intelligence to Assess Emotions in Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review,

    A. O. Rojas Vistorte et al., "Integrating Artificial Intelligence to Assess Emotions in Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review," Frontiers Psychol., vol. 15, 1387089, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089

    work page doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089 2024

  27. [27]

    The Effects of Affective Pedagogical Agent in Multimedia Learning Environments: A Meta- Analysis,

    Y. Wang, S. Gong, Y. Cao, Y. Lang, and X. Xu, "The Effects of Affective Pedagogical Agent in Multimedia Learning Environments: A Meta- Analysis," Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 38, 100506, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100506

    work page doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100506 2023

  28. [28]

    Empathic Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Systematic Literature Review,

    E. Ortega-Ochoa, M. Arguedas, and T. Daradoumis, "Empathic Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Systematic Literature Review," Brit. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 886–909, 2024, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13413

    work page doi:10.1111/bjet.13413 2024

  29. [29]

    How AI Companions Shape Learner's Socio-Emotional Learning and Metacognitive Development,

    B. Maples, M. Cerit, A. Vishwanath, and R. Pea, "How AI Companions Shape Learner's Socio-Emotional Learning and Metacognitive Development," AI & Society, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00146-025-02737-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02737-5 2025

  30. [30]

    Kirk, Iason Gabriel, Christopher Summerfield, et al

    H. R. Kirk, I. Gabriel, C. Summerfield, B. Vidgen, and S. A. Hale, "Why Human–AI Relationships Need Socioaffective Alignment," Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, 728, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04532-5

    work page doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04532-5 2025

  31. [31]

    The Idea of Gyeong/Jing 敬 in Yi Toegye’s Korean Neo- Confucianism and Its Availability in Contemporary Ethical Debate,

    S. G. Choi, “The Idea of Gyeong/Jing 敬 in Yi Toegye’s Korean Neo- Confucianism and Its Availability in Contemporary Ethical Debate,” in E. Y. J. Chung and J. S. Oh, Eds., Emotions in Korean Philosophy and Religion: Confucian, Comparative, and Contemporary Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, pp. 121–141, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94747-7_3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94747-7_3 2022

  32. [32]

    Self-reflection, Reverence (Gyeong), and Mind Cultivation (Simhak),

    E. Y. J. Chung, “Self-reflection, Reverence (Gyeong), and Mind Cultivation (Simhak),” in The Moral and Religious Thought of Yi Hwang (Toegye): A Study of Korean Neo-Confucian Ethics and Spirituality. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, pp. 81–90, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77924-5_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77924-5_6 2021

  33. [33]

    Thinking Through the Emotions with Korean Confucianism: Philosophical Translation and the Four-Seven Debate,

    J. E. Harroff, “Thinking Through the Emotions with Korean Confucianism: Philosophical Translation and the Four-Seven Debate,” in E. Y. J. Chung and J. S. Oh, Eds., Emotions in Korean Philosophy and Religion: Confucian, Comparative, and Contemporary Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, pp. 187–216, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94747-7_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94747-7_6 2022

  34. [34]

    IEEE Standard for Ethical Considerations in Emulated Empathy in Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, IEEE Std 7014-2024, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Luckin, W

    R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, and L. B. Forcier, Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London, U.K.: Pearson, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects,

    J. J. Gross, "Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects," Psychol. Inquiry, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781

    work page doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.940781 2015

  37. [37]

    Luckin, Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner- Centred Ecologies

    R. Luckin, Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner- Centred Ecologies. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2010

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Learning and Instruction , volume = 22, number = 2, pages =

    S. D'Mello and A. Graesser, "Dynamics of Affective States During Complex Learning," Learn. Instruct., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001 2012

  39. [39]

    Vallor, Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting

    S. Vallor, Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. New York, NY, USA: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees

    B. Mittelstadt, "Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI," Nature Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 501–507, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s42256- 019-0114-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256- 2019

  41. [41]

    Intelligence Augmentation: Upskilling Humans to Complement AI,

    C. Dede, A. Etemadi, and T. Forshaw, “Intelligence Augmentation: Upskilling Humans to Complement AI,” The Next Level Lab at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021. [28] J. Dewey, Art as Experience. New York, NY, USA: Minton, Balch & Co., 1934. A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author is especially indebted to Professor Chris Dede for his m...

    work page 2021