pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27170 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.FA· math.MP

Light-Cone Structure of Propagation of Entanglement

Israel Michael Sigal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.FAmath.MP
keywords entanglement propagationlight-conebipartite systemslocalized couplingsquantum networksentanglement transportlower bound
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bipartite quantum systems with localized couplings exhibit an effective light-cone for entanglement propagation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that entanglement cannot spread arbitrarily fast in a wide class of bipartite quantum systems when the couplings between components are localized. Instead, an effective light-cone governs the spread and imposes a strict lower bound on the time required to move entanglement to a distant location or sustain it there. This bound holds under ideal conditions with no loss or decoherence, revealing a structural limit rooted in the interaction pattern itself. A reader would care because it supplies a fundamental time scale for tasks like entanglement distribution in quantum networks, independent of external imperfections.

Core claim

For a wide class of bipartite systems with localized couplings, we establish existence of an effective light-cone for propagation of entanglement. This result yields a hard lower bound on the time it takes, under ideal conditions (no loss, no decoherence), to transport entanglement to a distant location (say, a node of a graph-structured quantum network), or to maintain it there.

What carries the argument

The effective light-cone for entanglement propagation, which follows from the localized couplings restricting how entanglement can spread in the bipartite system.

If this is right

  • Entanglement transport to a distant node requires at least a minimum time set by the light-cone.
  • Quantum networks face a structural speed limit on long-range entanglement distribution.
  • Maintaining entanglement at a remote location is also constrained by the same bound.
  • The result applies across many systems sharing only the property of localized couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This bound may constrain how quickly quantum teleportation or similar protocols can operate over extended distances.
  • Analogous cone structures might appear for other quantum resources like coherence or discord in similar systems.
  • Direct tests could involve measuring entanglement arrival times in engineered arrays of qubits with controlled short-range links.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum systems are bipartite with couplings localized to nearby parts, and evolution occurs with no loss or decoherence.

What would settle it

Observing entanglement appear at a distant site in less time than the light-cone bound allows, in a bipartite system whose couplings are only localized and under ideal conditions, would disprove the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27170 by Israel Michael Sigal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Physical set-up: entanglement is created at t = 0 in Y and measured at t in X. We formulate our main result. It uses the notions of local entanglement, local separability and (local) κ-separability, with 0 < κ ≪ 1, introduced in the next subsection. The latter notion describes states at the trace norm distance κ from separable ones. Let dXY denote the distance between subsets X and Y of Λ. We show Theorem … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Light cone ΛY,c of Y . If a set X lies outside ΛY,c, then the probability of entanglement in X is negligible. To our knowledge, this is the first result on the space-time dynamics of the entanglement. This rigorous result, obtained from the first principles, yields a hard lower bound, Tmin ≥ L/c(µ), on time it takes, under ideal conditions (no loss, no de￾coherence), to transport entanglement to a location… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For a wide class of bipartite systems with localized couplings, we establish existence of an effective light-cone for propagation of entanglement. This result yields a hard lower bound on the time it takes, under ideal conditions (no loss, no decoherence), to transport entanglement to a distant location (say, a node of a graph-structured quantum network), or to maintain it there.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes the existence of an effective light-cone for entanglement propagation in a wide class of bipartite quantum systems with localized couplings. By adapting Lieb-Robinson-type bounds to suitable entanglement monotones (e.g., concurrence or logarithmic negativity) for Hamiltonians with interaction terms supported on localized subsets of the bipartite partition, it derives a hard lower bound on the time required to transport entanglement to a distant location under ideal closed-system dynamics with no loss or decoherence.

Significance. If the result holds, it supplies a rigorous, parameter-free lower bound on entanglement transport times that extends the Lieb-Robinson framework directly to entanglement measures. This strengthens the theoretical understanding of information flow in many-body systems and has direct relevance to the design of quantum networks, where the bound applies under explicitly stated ideal conditions without hidden assumptions such as translation invariance or specific dimensionality.

minor comments (2)
  1. The precise delimitation of the 'wide class' of systems (via the locality condition on couplings) is used at every step of the derivation but could be stated as a single formal assumption in the introduction for easier reference.
  2. A short remark comparing the obtained bound with standard Lieb-Robinson velocity estimates for local observables would help contextualize the result for readers familiar with the original bounds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately captures the core contribution: an effective light-cone bound on entanglement propagation derived from Lieb-Robinson-type estimates applied to entanglement monotones under localized couplings and ideal closed-system dynamics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper derives an effective light-cone for entanglement propagation by adapting Lieb-Robinson-type bounds to a suitable entanglement monotone (e.g., concurrence or logarithmic negativity) for Hamiltonians whose interactions are supported on localized subsets of a bipartite partition. The resulting lower bound on transport time follows directly from the exponential decay outside the cone under the stated ideal closed-system dynamics. The 'wide class' is delimited solely by the locality condition on couplings, which is an explicit input assumption used at every step of the proof rather than a derived output. No self-definitional reductions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear; the derivation is self-contained and relies on standard external techniques.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are available from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5343 in / 1128 out tokens · 73861 ms · 2026-05-07T09:34:32.395352+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Ignacio Cirac, and Maciej Lewenstein,Entanglement percolation in quan- tum networks, Nature Physics3(2007), no

    Antonio Ac´ ın, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Maciej Lewenstein,Entanglement percolation in quan- tum networks, Nature Physics3(2007), no. 4, 256–259

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Vincenzo Alba and Pasquale Calabrese,Entanglement dynamics after quantum quenches in integrable systems, SciPost Physics4(2018), no. 3, 017

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral,Entanglement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80(2008), 517

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Bravyi, M

    S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete,Lieb-Robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006), no. 5, 050401

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Ignacio Cirac, and Peter Zoller,Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication, Phys

    Hans-J¨ urgen Briegel, Wolfgang D¨ ur, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Peter Zoller,Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998), no. 26, 5932–5935

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech.0406(2004), P06002

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Phys.A 42(2009), 504005

    ,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys.A 42(2009), 504005

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    del Campo, I

    A. del Campo, I. L. Egusquiza, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga,Quantum speed limits in open system dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2013), 050403

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Chen and A

    C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas,Finite speed of quantum scrambling with long range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 25, 250605

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    C.-F. Chen, A. Lucas, and C. Yin,Speed limits and locality in many-body quantum dynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics86(2023), no. 11, 116001

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Cheneau and et al,Light-cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nature (London)481(2012), 484

    M. Cheneau and et al,Light-cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nature (London)481(2012), 484

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Cheneau,Experimental Tests of Lieb-Robinson Bounds, EMS Press, Berlin, 2022

    M. Cheneau,Experimental Tests of Lieb-Robinson Bounds, EMS Press, Berlin, 2022. 18 I. M. SIGAL

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Conway,A Course in Operator Theory, American Mathematical Soc., 2000

    John B. Conway,A Course in Operator Theory, American Mathematical Soc., 2000

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    Costas, N

    N. Costas, N. Belabas, and D. Barral,Spatio-spectral quantum networks in nonlinear pho- tonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Research (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Plenio,Colloquium: Area laws for the entan- glement entropy, Reviews of Modern Physics82(2010), no

    Jens Eisert, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B. Plenio,Colloquium: Area laws for the entan- glement entropy, Reviews of Modern Physics82(2010), no. 1, 277–306

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Eisert and T

    J. Eisert and T. J. Osborne,General entanglement scaling laws from time evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006), no. 15, 150404

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Eldredge, Z.-X

    Z. Eldredge, Z.-X. Gong, J. T Young, A. H. Moosavian, M. Foss-Feig, and A. V. Gorshkov, Fast quantum state transfer and entanglement renormalization using long-range interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), no. 17, 170503

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    J. M. Epstein and K. B. Whaley,Quantum speed limits for quantum-information-processing task, Phys. Rev. A95(2017), no. 4, 042314

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Faupin, M

    J. Faupin, M. Lemm, and I. M. Sigal,On Lieb-Robinson bounds for the Bose-Hubbard model, Commun. Math. Phys.394(2022), no. 3, 1011–1037

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Faupin, M

    J. Faupin, M. Lemm, I. M. Sigal, and I. M. Zhang,Improved macroscopic transport bounds for many-body lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Fawzi and R

    O. Fawzi and R. Renner,Quantum conditional mutual information and approximate Markov chains, Commun. Math. Phys.340(2015), no. 2, 575–611

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Flannigan et al,Recent Progress on Mid-Infrared Single-Photon Detectors and Sources for Satellite-based QKD, Quantum Science and Technology (2025)

    L. Flannigan et al,Recent Progress on Mid-Infrared Single-Photon Detectors and Sources for Satellite-based QKD, Quantum Science and Technology (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Clark, and Alexey V

    Michael Foss-Feig, Zhe-Xuan Gong, Charles W. Clark, and Alexey V. Gorshkov,Nearly Linear Light Cones in Long-Range Interacting Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters 114(2015), no. 15, 157201

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Nicolas Gisin, Gr´ egoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden,Quantum cryptogra- phy, Reviews of Modern Physics74(2002), no. 1, 145

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    Gogolin and J

    C. Gogolin and J. Eisert,Equilibration, thermalization, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79(2016), no. 5, 056001

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Goold et al.,The role of quantum information in thermodynamics — a topical review, J

    J. Goold et al.,The role of quantum information in thermodynamics — a topical review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49(2016), 143001

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    M. B. Hastings,Locality in quantum and Markov dynamics on lattices and networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004), no. 14, 140402

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    ,An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.8 (2007), P08024, 14

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    ,Quantum belief propagation, an algorithm for thermal quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B76(2007), no. 20, 201102(R)

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Hastings and Tohru Koma,Spectral Gap and Exponential Decay of Correlations, Communications in Mathematical Physics265(2006), no

    Matthew B. Hastings and Tohru Koma,Spectral Gap and Exponential Decay of Correlations, Communications in Mathematical Physics265(2006), no. 3, 781–804

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    Hayashi,Quantum Information Theory, Springer, 2006

    M. Hayashi,Quantum Information Theory, Springer, 2006

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Hoke, Matteo Ippoliti, Pedram Roushan, and et al,Measurement-induced entan- glement and teleportation on a noisy quantum processor, Nature622(2023), 481–486

    Jesse C. Hoke, Matteo Ippoliti, Pedram Roushan, and et al,Measurement-induced entan- glement and teleportation on a noisy quantum processor, Nature622(2023), 481–486

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    A. S. Holevo, M. E. Shirokov, and R. F. Werner,Separability and entanglement-breaking in infinite dimensions, Russian Math Surveys60(2005), 1-12

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    Micha l Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki,Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A223(1996), 1–8

    work page 1996

  35. [35]

    2, 865–942

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, Micha l Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki,Quantum entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics81(2009), no. 2, 865–942

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Pawe l Horodecki and Barbara Terhal,Schmidt number for density matrices, Phys. Rev. A 61(2000), 040301. LIGHT-CONE STRUCTURE OF PROPAGATION OF ENTANGLEMENT 19

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement

    Cheryne Jonay, David A. Huse, and Adam Nahum,Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement(2018), available at1803.00089

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Physics Reports 369 (2002) 431-548

    Michael Keyl, Fundamentals of quantum information theory. Physics Reports 369 (2002) 431-548

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    von Keyserlingk, Tibor Rakovszky, Frank Pollmann, and Shivaji L

    Curt W. von Keyserlingk, Tibor Rakovszky, Frank Pollmann, and Shivaji L. Sondhi,Oper- ator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and Entanglement Growth in Systems without Conservation Laws, Physical Review X8(2018), no. 2, 021013

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Jeff Kimble,Ballistic spreading of entanglement in a diffusive nonintegrable system, Phys

    H. Jeff Kimble,Ballistic spreading of entanglement in a diffusive nonintegrable system, Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013), 127205

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    7198, 1023–1030

    ,The quantum internet, Nature453(2008), no. 7198, 1023–1030

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Kliesch, C

    M. Kliesch, C. Gogolin, and J. Eisert,Lieb-Robinson bounds and the simulation of time- evolution of local observables in lattice systems, In Many-Electron Approaches in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics, 301-318. Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Kuwahara and Lemm

    T. Kuwahara and Lemm. M.,Enhanced Lieb-Robinson bounds for a class of Bose-Hubbard type Hamiltonians, Preprint, arXiv 2405.04672 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Kuwahara and K

    T. Kuwahara and K. Saito,Strictly linear light cones in long-range interacting systems of arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. X10(2020), no. 3, 031010

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    ,Lieb-Robinson bound and almost-linear light cone in interacting boson systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 7, 070403

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Kuwahara, T

    T. Kuwahara, T. V. Vu, and K. Saito,Optimal light cone and digital quantum simulation of interacting bosons, Nature Communications15(2024), 2520

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    M. Lemm, C. Rubiliani, and J. Zhang,On the microscopic propagation speed of long-range quantum many-body systems, Preprint, arXiv 2310.14896 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    M. Lemm, C. Rubiliani, I. M. Sigal, and J. Zhang,Information propagation in long-range quantum many-body systems, Physical Review A108(2023), no. 6, L060401

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Yaodong Li, Xiao Chen, and Matthew P. A. Fisher,Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Physical Review B98(2018), no. 20, 205136

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Lieb and Derek W

    Elliott H. Lieb and Derek W. Robinson,The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems, Communications in Mathematical Physics28(1972), no. 3, 251–257

    work page 1972

  51. [51]

    Liu, S.K

    S. Liu, S.K. Jian, and S.X. Zhang,Noisy Monitored Quantum Circuits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18783 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Matsuta, T

    T. Matsuta, T. Koma, and T. Nakamura,Improving the Lieb-Robinson bound for long-range interactions, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e18(2017), 519–528

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    M´ ark Mezei and Douglas Stanford,On entanglement spreading in chaotic systems, Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017), no. 5, 65

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Nachtergaele, Y

    B. Nachtergaele, Y. Ogata, and R. Sims,Propagation of correlations in quantum lattice systems, J. Stat. Phys.124(2006), 1–13

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Nachtergaele, B

    B. Nachtergaele, B. Schlein, R. Sims, S. Starr, and V. Zagrebnov,On the existence of the dynamics for anharmonic quantum oscillator systems, Rev. Math. Phys.22(2010), 207– 231

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Nachtergaele and R

    B. Nachtergaele and R. Sims,Lieb-Robinson bounds and the exponential clustering theorem, Commun. Math. Phys.265(2006), 119–130

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Nachtergaele, R

    B. Nachtergaele, R. Sims, and A. Young,Quasi-locality bounds for quantum lattice systems. i. Lieb-Robinson bounds, quasi-local maps, and spectral flow automorphisms, J. Math. Phys. 60(2019), no. 6, 061101

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    3, 031016

    Adam Nahum, Jonathan Ruhman, Sagar Vijay, and Jeongwan Haah,Quantum Entangle- ment Growth under Random Unitary Dynamics, Physical Review X7(2017), no. 3, 031016

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    2, 021014

    Adam Nahum, Sagar Vijay, and Jeongwan Haah,Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits, Physical Review X8(2018), no. 2, 021014. 20 I. M. SIGAL

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    1, 010352

    Adam Nahum, S Roy, B Skinner, and J Ruhman,Measurement and entanglement phase transitions in all-to-all quantum circuits, on quantum trees, and in Landau-Ginsburg theory, PRX Quantum2(2021), no. 1, 010352

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information (Vol. 2), Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2001

    work page 2001

  62. [62]

    Ohya and I

    M. Ohya and I. Volovich,Mathematical foundations of quantum information and computa- tion and its applications to nano-and bio-systems, Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  63. [63]

    4, 1012–1236

    Stefano Pirandola et al,Advances in quantum cryptography, Advances in Optics and Pho- tonics12(2020), no. 4, 1012–1236

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani,An introduction to entanglement measures, Quantum Infor- mation & Computation7(2007), no. 1, 1–51

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    The Theory of the Quantum World: Proceedings of the 25th Solvay Conference on Physics

    J. Preskill,Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier, In “The Theory of the Quantum World: Proceedings of the 25th Solvay Conference on Physics”, World Scientific (2013), 63-80

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    ,Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2(2018), 79

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    ,Lecture Notes on Quantum Information, CALTECH, 2018

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    931, Springer, Cham, 2017

    Mukund Rangamani and Tadashi Takayanagi,Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 931, Springer, Cham, 2017

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Schatten,Norm Ideals of Completely Continuous Operators, Vol

    R. Schatten,Norm Ideals of Completely Continuous Operators, Vol. 27, Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    Schuch, S

    N. Schuch, S. K. Harrison, T. J. Osborne, and J. Eisert,Information propagation for interacting-particle systems, Phys. Rev. A84(2011), no. 3, 032309

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    M. E. Shirokov,The Schmidt number and partially entanglement breaking channels in infi- nite dimensions, Mathematical Notes93(2013), 766–779

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Sidhu et al,Advances in space quantum communications, IET Quantum Com- munication2(2021), no

    Jasminder S. Sidhu et al,Advances in space quantum communications, IET Quantum Com- munication2(2021), no. 4, 182–217

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    I. M. Sigal and X. Wu,On propagation of information in quantum mechanics and maximal velocity bounds, Lett. Math. Phys.115(2025), no. 17

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    ,On light cone bounds for Markov quantum open systems, Lett. Math. Phys. (2026)

    work page 2026

  75. [75]

    I. M. Sigal and J. Zhang,On propagation of information in quantum many-body systems, Annals of Physics (2025), 170103

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Simon,Trace Ideals and Their Applications, AMS Press, 2005

    B. Simon,Trace Ideals and Their Applications, AMS Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  77. [77]

    3, 031009

    Brian Skinner, Jonathan Ruhman, and Adam Nahum,Measurement-induced phase transi- tions in the dynamics of dntanglement, Physical Review X9(2019), no. 3, 031009

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Plenio,Colloquium: Quantum Coher- ence as a Resource, Rev

    Alexander Streltsov, Gerardo Adess, and Martin B. Plenio,Colloquium: Quantum Coher- ence as a Resource, Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017), 041003

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Tobias Swann, Denis Bernard, and Adam Nahum,Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement, Physical Review B112(2025), 064301

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Terhal,Detecting quantum entanglement, Theoretical Computer Science287 (2002), 313-335

    Barbara M. Terhal,Detecting quantum entanglement, Theoretical Computer Science287 (2002), 313-335

    work page 2002

Showing first 80 references.