pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27216 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Tuning of quantum nanoscaled friction within the Prandtl-Tomlinson model

Dai-Nam Le , Lilia M. Woods This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 09:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nanoscaled frictionPrandtl-Tomlinson modelquantum frictionstick-slip motionLandau-Zener tunnelingnanoparticle chainfrictional dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The frictional dynamics of nanoparticle chains can be controlled by the corrugation amplitude and characteristic length ratio in the Prandtl-Tomlinson model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the Prandtl-Tomlinson model to examine control of frictional force at nanoscales for both quantum and classical cases. Adjusting the corrugation strength of the potential and the ratio of lengths set by the nanoparticle and chain properties changes the motion type. Stick-slip is only one possibility; other regimes appear as well. Landau-Zener tunneling turns out to matter for the quantum version of the dynamics. The work aims to give concrete handles for managing friction based on measurable system features.

Core claim

In the Prandtl-Tomlinson framework applied to a nanoparticle interacting with a chain, frictional dynamics are governed by the corrugation parameter and the characteristic length ratio. These parameters, which depend on the nanoparticle-chain system, determine the accessible motion regimes. Besides the stick-slip regime, other types of motion occur. Landau-Zener tunneling plays a central role in the quantum frictional motion.

What carries the argument

The Prandtl-Tomlinson model of a particle pulled by a spring across a periodic corrugated potential, extended to quantum dynamics, with the corrugation amplitude and the ratio of nanoparticle to chain length scales serving as the tunable controls.

If this is right

  • Motion type can be switched by changing the corrugation amplitude or length ratio without altering other system features.
  • Quantum frictional behavior becomes accessible to control through the same two parameters.
  • Experimental force traces can be interpreted by mapping observed regimes onto the model's parameter space.
  • Quantum effects such as Landau-Zener transitions can be made dominant or suppressed by parameter choice.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same parameter controls may suggest design rules for friction in other atomic-scale models that share periodic potentials.
  • Material-specific chain spacings could be chosen to target desired friction regimes in fabricated nanostructures.
  • Velocity-dependent force measurements in trapped-ion or colloidal systems might test the predicted transitions between motion types.

Load-bearing premise

The Prandtl-Tomlinson model together with its selected parameters and quantum extensions already contains the essential physics of real nanoscaled friction.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of frictional force versus pulling speed or substrate corrugation in a nanoparticle-chain experiment that produces motion types absent from the model's predicted regimes at the measured length ratio.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27216 by Dai-Nam Le, Lilia M. Woods.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Graphical sketch of the considered system where a nanoparticle confined by a parabolic optical trap moves above an view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Total potential energy surface view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Classical (black) and quantum (blue) maximal lateral forces scaled by view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Classical (black) and quantum (blue) maximal lateral forces scaled by view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Classical (black) and quantum (blue) maximal lateral forces scaled by view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nanoscaled friction is a fundamental tribological phenomenon with complex behavior of its dynamical force. Here, we utilize the Prandtl-Tomlinson framework to investigate systematically the different means of control of the frictional force at the quantum and classical levels. It is found that the frictional dynamics can be controlled by the corrugation and characteristic length ratio parameters dependent upon properties of the nanoparticle-chain system. In addition to the stick-slip regime, other types of motion are uncovered, highlighting the richness of the frictional dynamics. The importance of Landau-Zener tunneling for the quantum motion is also analyzed. These findings provide valuable insights for interpreting experimental observations and controlling quantum frictional behavior in nanoscale systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Prandtl-Tomlinson model to study nanoscaled friction at both classical and quantum levels. It systematically varies the corrugation amplitude and characteristic length ratio to demonstrate control over frictional force and dynamics, identifies multiple motion regimes beyond stick-slip, and emphasizes the role of Landau-Zener tunneling in the quantum case. The central claim is that these parameters, linked to nanoparticle-chain properties, enable tuning of frictional behavior within the model.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work offers a clear demonstration of parameter-driven control of friction regimes inside a standard model, including the quantum contribution from Landau-Zener transitions. This could aid interpretation of nanoscale experiments and motivate further studies of tunable friction. The systematic parameter exploration is a positive feature, though external validity to real systems remains an open question outside the manuscript's scope.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (quantum dynamics): the analysis of Landau-Zener tunneling is presented via approximate rates, but no direct comparison to full time-dependent Schrödinger evolution or convergence checks with respect to basis size or time step is shown; this weakens the claim that LZ is the dominant mechanism for the observed quantum motion.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 and Fig. 5: the reported transitions between stick-slip and other regimes depend on the specific choice of damping and driving velocity; no systematic scan or robustness test against small variations in these auxiliary parameters is provided, making the 'richness of frictional dynamics' claim sensitive to unstated defaults.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that parameters are 'dependent upon properties of the nanoparticle-chain system,' yet the text treats them as independent inputs; a brief paragraph clarifying the intended mapping would improve clarity.
  2. [§2] Notation for the corrugation amplitude and length ratio is introduced inconsistently between the classical and quantum sections; a single table of symbols would help.
  3. [Figures] Figure captions lack error bars or ensemble sizes for the averaged friction forces; adding this information would strengthen the presentation of numerical results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (quantum dynamics): the analysis of Landau-Zener tunneling is presented via approximate rates, but no direct comparison to full time-dependent Schrödinger evolution or convergence checks with respect to basis size or time step is shown; this weakens the claim that LZ is the dominant mechanism for the observed quantum motion.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation against the full time-dependent Schrödinger equation would strengthen the quantum analysis. In the revised manuscript we will add representative comparisons to the exact evolution together with convergence checks on basis size and time step, confirming that the Landau-Zener rates capture the dominant contribution in the explored regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 and Fig. 5: the reported transitions between stick-slip and other regimes depend on the specific choice of damping and driving velocity; no systematic scan or robustness test against small variations in these auxiliary parameters is provided, making the 'richness of frictional dynamics' claim sensitive to unstated defaults.

    Authors: We acknowledge the dependence on auxiliary parameters. In the revision we will include a systematic scan of damping and driving velocity over a small interval around the reported values and demonstrate that the identified motion regimes remain robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow directly from model equations

full rationale

The paper performs a parametric study inside the established Prandtl-Tomlinson model (classical and quantum-extended). It varies the corrugation amplitude and characteristic length ratio, solves the equations of motion or Schrödinger evolution, and reports the resulting regimes (stick-slip and others) plus the role of Landau-Zener tunneling. These outcomes are direct numerical consequences of the chosen inputs; no prediction is fitted to data and then re-presented as independent, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The claim that dynamics are controllable by those parameters is true by construction of the model but is not disguised as a first-principles derivation beyond the model itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard Prandtl-Tomlinson potential and its quantum extension; no new entities are introduced, but the model contains several adjustable parameters whose values determine the reported regimes.

free parameters (2)
  • corrugation parameter
    Amplitude of the periodic potential; controls stick-slip vs other regimes and is varied to tune friction.
  • characteristic length ratio
    Ratio of particle spacing to surface lattice constant; another control knob for dynamics.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Prandtl-Tomlinson model accurately represents the essential energetics of nanoparticle-chain friction at both classical and quantum levels.
    Invoked throughout as the framework for all results.
  • domain assumption Landau-Zener tunneling formula applies directly to the quantum transitions between potential wells in this driven system.
    Used to analyze quantum motion without additional justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5409 in / 1419 out tokens · 48477 ms · 2026-05-07T09:58:24.119517+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Vakis, V

    A. Vakis, V. Yastrebov, J. Scheibert, L. Nicola, D. Dini, C. Minfray, A. Almqvist, M. Paggi, S. Lee, G. Limbert, J. Molinari, G. Anciaux, R. Aghababaei, S. Echeverri Restrepo, A. Papangelo, A. Cammarata, P. Nicolini, C. Putignano, G. Carbone, S. Stupkiewicz, J. Lengiewicz, G. Costagliola, F. Bosia, R. Guarino, N. Pugno, M. M¨ user, and M. Ciavarella, Mode...

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    A. I. Volokitin and B. N. J. Persson, Near-field radiative heat transfer and noncontact friction, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 1291 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    K. A. Milton, J. S. Høye, and I. Brevik, The Reality of Casimir Friction, Symmetry8, 29 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    M. B. Far´ ıas, F. C. Lombardo, A. Soba, P. I. Villar, and R. S. Decca, Towards detecting traces of non-contact quantum friction in the corrections of the accumulated geometric phase, npj Quantum. Inf.6(2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    F. C. Lombardo, R. S. Decca, L. Viotti, and P. I. Villar, Detectable Signature of Quantum Friction on a Sliding Particle in Vacuum, Adv. Quantum. Technol.4, 2000155 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Ke, D.-N

    M. Ke, D.-N. Le, and L. M. Woods, Casimir interactions between two parallel graphene sheets carrying steady-state drift currents, Phys. Rev. B113, 075414 (2026)

    work page 2026

  7. [7]

    Szlufarska, M

    I. Szlufarska, M. Chandross, and R. W. Carpick, Recent advances in single-asperity nanotribology, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 123001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    X. Wang, Z. Liu, Y. He, S. Tan, G. Wang, and S. X. Mao, Atomic-scale friction between single-asperity contacts unveiled through in situ transmission electron microscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 737–745 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Wolloch, G

    M. Wolloch, G. Losi, M. Ferrario, and M. C. Righi, High-throughput screening of the static friction and ideal cleavage strength of solid interfaces, Sci. Rep.9, 17062 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Cahangirov, C

    S. Cahangirov, C. Ataca, M. Topsakal, H. Sahin, and S. Ciraci, Frictional Figures of Merit for Single Layered Nanostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 126103 (2012). 12

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Restuccia, G

    P. Restuccia, G. Losi, O. Chehaimi, M. Marsili, and M. C. Righi, High-Throughput First-Principles Prediction of Interfacial Adhesion Energies in Metal-on-Metal Contacts, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces15, 19624 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    G. Losi, O. Chehaimi, and M. C. Righi, Tribchem: A software for the first-principles, high-throughput study of solid interfaces and their tribological properties, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 5231 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    R. K. Barik and L. M. Woods, Frictional Properties of Two-Dimensional Materials: Data-Driven Machine Learning Pre- dictive Modeling, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces16, 40149 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    P. L. Silvestrelli, S. Subashchandrabose, A. Ambrosetti, and M. C. Righi, Sliding properties of transition metal dichalco- genide bilayers, J. Chem. Phys.163, 084709 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    D. T.-X. Dang, D.-N. Le, and L. M. Woods, Twisting inh-BN bilayers and their angle-dependent properties, Phys. Rev. B112, 085102 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Wolloch, G

    M. Wolloch, G. Levita, P. Restuccia, and M. C. Righi, Interfacial Charge Density and Its Connection to Adhesion and Frictional Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026804 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    P. C. Torche, A. Silva, D. Kramer, T. Polcar, and O. Hovorka, Multi-scale model predicting friction of crystalline materials, Adv. Mater. Interfaces9, 2100914 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Kajita, A

    S. Kajita, A. Pacini, G. Losi, N. Kikkawa, and M. C. Righi, Accurate multiscale simulation of frictional interfaces by quantum mechanics/green’s function molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 5176 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Tomlinson, CVI

    G. Tomlinson, CVI. A molecular theory of friction , London Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci.7, 905 (1929)

    work page 1929

  20. [20]

    Prandtl, Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinetischen Theorie der festen K¨ orper, J

    L. Prandtl, Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinetischen Theorie der festen K¨ orper, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 8,8, 85 (1928)

    work page 1928

  21. [21]

    F. R. Krajewski and M. H. M¨ user, Quantum Creep and Quantum-Creep Transitions in 1D Sine-Gordon Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 030601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    F. R. Krajewski and M. H. M¨ user, Quantum dynamics in the highly discrete, commensurate Frenkel Kontorova model: A path-integral molecular dynamics study, J. Chem. Phys.122, 124711 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    H. Xu, W. Chen, and Y. Zhu, Influence of the bond defect in driven Frenkel-Kontorova chains, Phys. Rev. B75, 224303 (2007)

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    V. A. Bustos and O. J. Furlong, Stick-slip friction: A Monte Carlo study, Tribol. Int.102, 355 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    O. J. Furlong, S. J. Manzi, V. D. Pereyra, V. Bustos, and W. T. Tysoe, Kinetic Monte Carlo theory of sliding friction, Phys. Rev. B80, 153408 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    R. A. El-Nabulsi, Path integral method for quantum dissipative systems with dynamical friction: Applications to quantum dots/zero-dimensional nanocrystals, Superlattices Microstruct.144, 106581 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    D.-N. Le, P. Rodriguez-Lopez, and L. M. Woods, Quantum stick-slip motion in nanoscaled friction, Quantumaccepted, 2502.14207v2 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Zanca, F

    T. Zanca, F. Pellegrini, G. E. Santoro, and E. Tosatti, Frictional lubricity enhanced by quantum mechanics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 3547 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Landau, Zur Theorie der Energieubertragung

    L. Landau, Zur Theorie der Energieubertragung. II, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion2, 46–51 (1932)

    work page 1932

  30. [30]

    Zener, Non-Adiabatic Crossing of Energy Levels, Proc

    C. Zener, Non-Adiabatic Crossing of Energy Levels, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A137, 696 (1932)

    work page 1932

  31. [31]

    V. L. Pokrovsky and N. A. Sinitsyn, Landau-Zener transitions in a linear chain, Phys. Rev. B65, 153105 (2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Huang and Y

    Z. Huang and Y. Zhao, Dynamics of dissipative Landau-Zener transitions, Phys. Rev. A97, 013803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Arceci, S

    L. Arceci, S. Barbarino, R. Fazio, and G. E. Santoro, Dissipative Landau-Zener problem and thermally assisted Quantum Annealing, Phys. Rev. B96, 054301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Influence of Dissipation on Quantum Tunneling in Macroscopic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 211 (1981)

    work page 1981

  35. [35]

    Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed

    U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Stone,The Theory of Intermolecular Forces(Oxford University Press, 2013)

    A. Stone,The Theory of Intermolecular Forces(Oxford University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    D.-N. Le, P. Rodriguez-Lopez, and L. M. Woods, Nonlinear effects in manybody van der waals interactions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013289 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    D. T.-X. Dang, D.-N. Le, and L. M. Woods, Dissecting van der Waals interactions with density functional theory – Wannier-basis approach, Comput. Phys. Commun.310, 109525 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Dittrich, P

    T. Dittrich, P. H¨ aanggi, G.-L. Ingold, B. Krammer, G. Sch¨ on, and W. Zwerger,Quantum transport and dissipation(Wiley- VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1998)

    work page 1998

  40. [40]

    Yamaguchi, T

    M. Yamaguchi, T. Yuge, and T. Ogawa, Markovian quantum master equation beyond adiabatic regime, Phys. Rev. E95, 012136 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of integrals, series, and products(Academic press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Socoliuc, R

    A. Socoliuc, R. Bennewitz, E. Gnecco, and E. Meyer, Transition from Stick-Slip to Continuous Sliding in Atomic Friction: Entering a New Regime of Ultralow Friction, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 134301 (2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    Bartels, G

    L. Bartels, G. Meyer, and K.-H. Rieder, Basic Steps of Lateral Manipulation of Single Atoms and Diatomic Clusters with a Scanning Tunneling Microscope Tip, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 697 (1997)

    work page 1997

  44. [44]

    X.-Z. Liu, Z. Ye, Y. Dong, P. Egberts, R. W. Carpick, and A. Martini, Dynamics of Atomic Stick-Slip Friction Examined with Atomic Force Microscopy and Atomistic Simulations at Overlapping Speeds, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 146102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    C. M. Almeida, R. Prioli, B. Fragneaud, L. G. Can¸ cado, R. Paupitz, D. S. Galv˜ ao, M. De Cicco, M. G. Menezes, C. A. Achete, and R. B. Capaz, Giant and Tunable Anisotropy of Nanoscale Friction in Graphene, Sci. Rep.6, 31569 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Yang, K.-t

    C.-W. Yang, K.-t. Leung, R.-F. Ding, H.-C. Ko, Y.-H. Lu, C.-K. Fang, and I.-S. Hwang, Lateral Force Microscopy of Interfacial Nanobubbles: Friction Reduction and Novel Frictional Behavior, Sci. Rep.8, 3125 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Sch¨ affer, S

    E. Sch¨ affer, S. F. Nørrelykke, and J. Howard, Surface Forces and Drag Coefficients of Microspheres near a Plane Surface Measured with Optical Tweezers, Langmuir23, 3654 (2007). 13

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    Gangloff, A

    D. Gangloff, A. Bylinskii, I. Counts, W. Jhe, and V. Vuleti´ c, Velocity tuning of friction with two trapped atoms, Nat. Phys.11, 915–919 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Counts, D

    I. Counts, D. Gangloff, A. Bylinskii, J. Hur, R. Islam, and V. Vuleti´ c, Multislip Friction with a Single Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 043601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    N. A. Peters, T.-C. Wei, and P. G. Kwiat, Mixed-state sensitivity of several quantum-information benchmarks, Phys. Rev. A70, 052309 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Wilkie and M

    J. Wilkie and M. C ¸ etinba¸ s, Variable-stepsize Runge–Kutta methods for stochastic Schr¨ odinger equations, Physics Letters A337, 166 (2005)

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    S. M. Rytov, Y. A. Kravtsov, and V. I. Tatarskii,Principles of Statistical Radiophysics 3(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989)

    work page 1989

  53. [53]

    Gnecco, R

    E. Gnecco, R. Roth, and A. Baratoff, Analytical expressions for the kinetic friction in the Prandtl-Tomlinson model, Phys. Rev. B86, 035443 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    M. H. M¨ user, Velocity dependence of kinetic friction in the Prandtl-Tomlinson model, Phys. Rev. B84, 125419 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Shabani, A

    M. Shabani, A. Silva, F. Pellegrini, J. Wang, R. Buzio, A. Gerbi, A. Vanossi, A. Sadeghi, and E. Tosatti, Can Neural Networks Learn Atomic Stick–Slip Friction?, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces17, 42454 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Bonvin, L

    E. Bonvin, L. Devaud, M. Rossi, A. Militaru, L. Dania, D. S. Bykov, M. Teller, T. E. Northup, L. Novotny, and M. Frimmer, Hybrid Paul-optical trap with large optical access for levitated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043129 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Zenesini, H

    A. Zenesini, H. Lignier, G. Tayebirad, J. Radogostowicz, D. Ciampini, R. Mannella, S. Wimberger, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Time-Resolved Measurement of Landau-Zener Tunneling in Periodic Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 090403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  58. [58]

    Le, N.-T

    D.-N. Le, N.-T. D. Hoang, and V.-H. Le, Exact analytical solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation for a two dimensional purely sextic double-well potential, J. Math. Phys.59, 032101 (2018)

    work page 2018