arxiv: 2604.27471 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Constraints on a Light Singlet Scalar from Combined Exotic Higgs Decays

F. Azari , M. Haghighat

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 08:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th

keywords singlet scalarexotic Higgs decaysmixing angleHiggs width constraintlight scalartwo-body and three-body decaysdecay rate bounds

0 comments

The pith

Requiring that exotic Higgs decays into a light singlet scalar do not exceed the SM total width bounds the mixing angle to cos θ below 0.13 for masses up to 40 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the Standard Model with a real gauge-singlet scalar and calculates the Higgs decay rates to two and three scalars when the scalar is light, between 0 and 40 GeV. It imposes the global requirement that the sum of these exotic partial widths cannot exceed the total Standard Model Higgs decay width. This condition produces a fourth-order inequality in the singlet vacuum expectation value whose solution restricts the Higgs-singlet mixing angle. The resulting bound holds uniformly across the mass range and supplies an indirect limit that does not rely on direct detection of the scalar. With an external tighter limit on mixing the authors further extract concrete upper bounds on each exotic decay rate.

Core claim

For a light real singlet scalar with mass in (0, 40) GeV the sum of the analytically computed widths Γ(h → φφ) + Γ(h → φφφ) must remain below the SM Higgs total width; this requirement translates into a fourth-order inequality on the singlet VEV that forces cos θ < 0.12–0.13 over the entire interval, independent of direct-search limits.

What carries the argument

The fourth-order inequality obtained by demanding Γ(h → φφ) + Γ(h → φφφ) ≤ Γ_h^SM, which directly limits the singlet VEV and thereby the mixing angle cos θ.

If this is right

The mixing-angle upper limit cos θ < 0.12–0.13 applies uniformly for every scalar mass in 0 < m_φ < 40 GeV.
Adopting the stronger external constraint cos θ < 0.1 yields Γ(h → φφ) < 0.06 MeV.
The same stronger mixing bound yields Γ(h → φφφ) < 5 × 10^{-6} MeV.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the bound is nearly saturated, precision measurements of the Higgs total width at future colliders could detect the exotic contribution without needing to reconstruct the light scalar directly.
The width-derived limit can be combined with existing direct-search exclusions to shrink the allowed parameter space in a model-independent way.
Any future observation of a larger-than-SM Higgs width would immediately relax or remove the present constraint on the singlet mixing.

Load-bearing premise

The Higgs boson’s total decay width is taken to be exactly the Standard Model value, so any exotic contribution is required not to exceed it.

What would settle it

An experimental determination that the combined two- and three-body exotic rates exceed the measured SM Higgs total width, or a direct extraction of cos θ > 0.13 with no corresponding increase in total width, would falsify the derived bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27471 by F. Azari, M. Haghighat.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Feynman Diagrams of Higgs decay channels to three new scalar singlet. Diagram (a) is the contact diagram, while (b) and (c) involve intermediate scalar exchange and are suppressed in the small-mixing regime. To this end, one can obtain the decay rate as follows: Γh→3ϕ = 81mh 64π 3 (λ3 − 2λϕ) 2 12 sin2 θ cos2 θI(mϕ), (13) where I(mϕ) = ∫ (1− √m2 ϕ /m2 h ) 2 4m2 ϕ /m2 h ( 2 s (s 4 + ( −6m2 ϕ m2 h − 2)s 3 + (… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Feynman rules for Higgs-scalar particle couplings relevant for the Higgs decay channels to three new scalar singlet. The vertex factors are shown for each interaction. in which A and B are considered in MeV units while mh, mϕ and vh are given in GeV units. The total Higgs decay width has been measured by the CMS collaboration using the off-shell production method. According to the Particle Data Group (PDG)… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The plot of I(mϕ) as a function of mϕ. The integral decreases as mϕ increases due to phase space suppression. which leads to an equation for vϕ as: W4 = a4v 4 ϕ + a3v 3 ϕ + a2v 2 ϕ + a1vϕ + a0 ≲ 0, (21) where a4 − a0 are defined as follows a4 = (A sin2 θ cos4 θ − 3.2(1 − 0.99 sin2 θ)) (MeV), a3 = 2Avh sin3 θ cos3 θ, a2 = ( Av2 h sin4 θ cos2 θ + B (m2 h−m2 ϕ ) 2 v 2 h sin4 θ cos4 θ ) , a1 = ( −2B m2 h−m2 ϕ … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The solid curve represents the value of cos θ for which the coefficient a4 in Eq. (25) vanishes, as a function of the scalar mass mϕ. The region below the curve corresponds to a4 < 0, which is the physically allowed region. This yields the bound cos θ < 0.12−0.13 across the mass range. As the sign of a4 is important for examining the inequality (21), we have solved a4 = 0 for different mϕ to find which ran… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: , which plots the roots of the quartic equation from (21) and shows agreement with the analytical expression (27). The figure indicates the allowed region begins at vϕ ≳ 5.9 TeV, consistent with the analytical calculation. cos θ=0.1, mφ=1 GeV -2 0 2 4 6 -0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 vφ(TeV) W4 (10)12 view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Values of vϕ and the couplings λ3, and λϕ as functions of mϕ, for a fixed mixing angle cos θ = 0.1. The curves are derived from the constraint that the sum of exotic Higgs decay rates saturates the allowed BSM width. As mϕ increases, the minimum allowed vϕ increases while λ3 decreases. 3.2 Higgs decay rate to two real scalar particles view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The partial decay width Γ(h → ϕϕ) as a function of the scalar mass mϕ, for a fixed mixing angle cos θ = 0.1. The curve represents the maximum allowed rate under the constraint Γ(h → ϕϕ)+Γ(h → ϕϕϕ) ≤ ΓBSM. The width remains approximately constant at 0.06 MeV due to the compensation between the decreasing phase space factor and the increasing coupling factors, with the squared coupling enhancing the compensa… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The partial decay width Γ(h → ϕϕϕ) as a function of the scalar mass mϕ, for a fixed mixing angle cos θ = 0.1. The curve represents the maximum allowed rate under the constraint Γ(h → ϕϕ) + Γ(h → ϕϕϕ) ≤ ΓBSM. The three-body width is significantly smaller than the two-body width, reaching at most 5 × 10−6 MeV. 4 Conclusion In this work, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of the exotic Higgs decays wi… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Complete set of Feynman rules for the Standard Model extended by a real singlet scalar field ϕ. All vertex factors are displayed with their corresponding diagrams. The interactions with gauge bosons (hVV, hhVV, etc.) are modified by factors of sin θ and cos θ relative to the SM couplings. 20 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the phenomenology of the Standard Model extended by a real gauge-singlet scalar field, focusing on exotic Higgs decay channels. For a light scalar mass in the range \(0 < m_{\phi} < 40\) GeV, the Higgs boson can decay to both two and three scalar final states. We derive analytical expressions for these decay rates and impose a global constraint on the model parameters by requiring that their sum does not exceed the total Standard Model Higgs boson decay width. This requirement translates into a fourth-order inequality with respect to the singlet vacuum expectation value, \(v_{\phi}\). We demonstrate that satisfying this inequality imposes an upper bound of \(\cos \theta < 0.12 - 0.13\) across the entire mass range, providing a complementary constraint to existing direct search limits. Utilizing stronger independent constraints on the mixing (e.g., \(\cos \theta < 0.1\)), we then predict upper bounds on the individual exotic decay rates as a function of \(m_{\phi}\) as \(\Gamma_{h \rightarrow \phi \phi} < 0.06\) MeV and \(\Gamma_{h \rightarrow \phi \phi \phi} < 5 \times 10^{- 6}\) MeV, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives closed-form rates for the two- and three-body exotic Higgs decays and combines them into a mass-independent mixing bound near 0.13, but the saturation condition on the total width omits the mixing suppression on the SM pieces.

read the letter

The main contribution is the set of analytic expressions for Γ(h → φφ) and Γ(h → φφφ) in the real-singlet model, followed by the requirement that their sum stays below the SM Higgs width. This produces a single upper limit cos θ < 0.12–0.13 that holds across the 0–40 GeV mass window and can be read off without scanning parameters. The three-body formula in particular is not obvious at first glance and is presented in usable form. Once a tighter external limit such as cos θ < 0.1 is imposed, the paper also quotes the resulting caps on the individual exotic widths, which are small enough to be relevant for future searches. That part is straightforward and correctly executed on the given assumptions. The soft spot is the width constraint itself. The paper writes Γ_exotic ≤ Γ_h^SM. In the model the SM partial widths are scaled by (1 − cos²θ), so the total width is actually (1 − cos²θ)Γ_SM + Γ_exotic. Keeping the total at or below the SM value would replace the right-hand side with cos²θ Γ_SM. At the quoted boundary the difference is only about 1.7 percent, yet the exotic widths depend on the same mixing parameter, so the fourth-order inequality will shift slightly once the factor is restored. The abstract gives no sign that this adjustment was made. The rest of the work is standard tree-level phenomenology with no new data or higher-order corrections. The numerical bound is not obviously present in the cited literature, but the overall approach is routine. A reader who needs quick analytic reference expressions or a simple complementary limit on light singlets will get value from the paper. It is internally consistent once the width detail is noted and shows honest engagement with the model, so it is worth sending to a referee for a standard phenomenology journal.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents constraints on a light real gauge-singlet scalar φ (0 < m_φ < 40 GeV) in the SM extension by requiring that the sum of exotic Higgs decay widths Γ(h → φφ) + Γ(h → φφφ) does not exceed the SM Higgs total width. Analytical expressions for these widths are derived, leading to a fourth-order inequality in the singlet VEV v_φ. Solving this yields an upper limit cos θ < 0.12–0.13 on the mixing angle across the mass range, which is then used with stronger mixing bounds to predict upper limits on the exotic widths: Γ(h→φφ) < 0.06 MeV and Γ(h→φφφ) < 5×10^{-6} MeV.

Significance. This work offers a complementary indirect constraint on light singlets from the precisely measured Higgs width, which is valuable alongside direct searches at the LHC. The derivation of analytical decay rates and the resulting mass-independent bound on cos θ are positive features. If the inequality setup is adjusted to properly account for mixing effects on the SM widths, the result could strengthen the case for using total width measurements in BSM phenomenology. The numerical bound is modest but provides a clear, falsifiable prediction.

major comments (2)

[Derivation of the global constraint (section containing the fourth-order inequality)] The saturation condition is set as Γ_exotic ≤ Γ_h^{SM} (see the paragraph deriving the fourth-order inequality on v_φ). However, in the singlet-mixed model the SM-like partial widths are scaled by cos²θ, so Γ_total = cos²θ ⋅ Γ_SM + Γ_exotic. The experimental observable is the signal strength μ ≈ cos⁴θ ⋅ (Γ_SM / Γ_total) rather than direct saturation against Γ_SM. The paper should derive and solve the corrected inequality to confirm whether the reported bound cos θ < 0.12-0.13 remains valid or requires adjustment. At the quoted boundary the correction is O(1%), but the fourth-order dependence on the mixing parameters makes explicit verification necessary.
[Abstract and results section] The abstract and results claim that the inequality imposes cos θ < 0.12-0.13 uniformly across the entire mass range, but no explicit solution of the fourth-order polynomial, no plot of the bound versus m_φ, and no verification that all diagrams and phase-space factors are included without approximation are provided. The manuscript should add this explicit check (e.g., in an appendix or figure) to support the central claim.

minor comments (2)

[Model setup] The definition of the mixing angle θ (i.e., whether the 125 GeV state is cos θ times the SM Higgs plus sin θ times the singlet) should be stated explicitly in the model Lagrangian section.
[Abstract and final results] The predicted upper bounds on the exotic widths are quoted in absolute MeV units; quoting the corresponding branching ratios relative to the total width would facilitate direct comparison with experimental limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding the precise formulation of the global constraint and the explicit verification of the mass-independent bound are helpful for improving clarity. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The saturation condition is set as Γ_exotic ≤ Γ_h^{SM}. However, in the singlet-mixed model the SM-like partial widths are scaled by cos²θ, so Γ_total = cos²θ ⋅ Γ_SM + Γ_exotic. The experimental observable is the signal strength μ ≈ cos⁴θ ⋅ (Γ_SM / Γ_total) rather than direct saturation against Γ_SM. The paper should derive and solve the corrected inequality to confirm whether the reported bound cos θ < 0.12-0.13 remains valid or requires adjustment. At the quoted boundary the correction is O(1%), but the fourth-order dependence makes explicit verification necessary.

Authors: We agree that a fully rigorous treatment should incorporate the cos²θ scaling of the SM-like widths. The total width is Γ_total = cos²θ Γ_SM + Γ_exotic, and signal strengths involve the ratio Γ_SM / Γ_total. However, because the derived bound satisfies cosθ ≲ 0.13 (so cos²θ ≲ 0.017), the correction to the inequality Γ_exotic ≤ Γ_SM is only O(1%). Solving the self-consistent version Γ_exotic ≤ Γ_SM (1 − cos²θ) numerically yields an upper limit on cosθ that differs by less than 0.5% from the quoted 0.12–0.13 range across the mass interval. The fourth-order polynomial does not amplify the shift because the dominant terms remain the same. We will add a short paragraph and a footnote in the revised manuscript confirming this explicit check and stating that the central bound is unchanged to the reported precision. revision: partial
Referee: The abstract and results claim that the inequality imposes cos θ < 0.12-0.13 uniformly across the entire mass range, but no explicit solution of the fourth-order polynomial, no plot of the bound versus m_φ, and no verification that all diagrams and phase-space factors are included without approximation are provided. The manuscript should add this explicit check (e.g., in an appendix or figure) to support the central claim.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit documentation of the numerical solution. The fourth-order inequality was solved numerically for each m_φ value between 0 and 40 GeV using the exact analytical width expressions (which retain all tree-level diagrams and the full three-body phase-space factors without approximation). The resulting upper limit on cosθ is indeed nearly constant, varying only between 0.12 and 0.13. In the revised version we will add a figure showing the derived cosθ upper bound versus m_φ and include in an appendix the explicit polynomial coefficients together with sample numerical solutions at representative masses (e.g., 10 GeV and 30 GeV) to allow independent verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; bound derived from external SM width benchmark

full rationale

The paper first derives closed-form expressions for Γ(h→φφ) and Γ(h→φφφ) as functions of the model parameters including cos θ and v_φ. It then imposes the external requirement that the sum of these exotic widths does not exceed the independently measured or calculated SM Higgs total width Γ_h^SM. The resulting fourth-order inequality in v_φ is solved to extract the numerical upper limit cos θ < 0.12–0.13. Because Γ_h^SM is an external input (not fitted or defined from the same exotic widths), and cos θ appears as an input parameter whose value is constrained rather than presupposed, the derivation does not reduce to a tautology or self-definition. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to justify the central step. The logic is therefore self-contained against an external benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of the singlet scalar, the validity of the tree-level mixing and decay calculations, and the use of the measured SM Higgs width as an external upper limit.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The total Higgs decay width equals the Standard Model prediction
Invoked when requiring that the sum of exotic widths does not exceed the SM width.

invented entities (1)

real gauge-singlet scalar field φ no independent evidence
purpose: To extend the SM and generate exotic Higgs decays to two or three scalars
Postulated BSM degree of freedom whose mixing with the Higgs is constrained by the width requirement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5524 in / 1465 out tokens · 30823 ms · 2026-05-07T08:57:04.184925+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

S. L. Glashow, Partial Symmetries of Weak Interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22 (1961) 579

1961
[2]

Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys

S. Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264

1967
[3]

Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Conf

A. Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Conf. Proc. C680519 (1968) 367

1968
[4]

P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508

1964
[5]

Englert and R

F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Masses of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321

1964
[6]

G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585

1964
[7]

Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1, [arXiv:1207.7214]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012
[8]

Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30, [arXiv:1207.7235]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[9]

Silveira and A

V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. B161 (1985) 136

1985
[10]

McDonald, Phys

J. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 3637

1994
[11]

Profumo, M

S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, C. L. Wainwright, P. Winslow, Singlet-Catalyzed Electroweak Phase Transitions and Precision Higgs Studies, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 035018, [arXiv:1407.5342]

work page arXiv 2015
[12]

G. C. Branco et al., Theory and phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1, [arXiv:1106.0034]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[13]

Veltman and F

M. Veltman and F. Yndurain, Radiative corrections to WW scattering, Nucl. Phys. B325 (1989) 1

1989
[14]

Schabinger and J

R. Schabinger and J. D. Wells, A Minimal Spontaneously Broken Hidden Sector and its Impact on Higgs Boson Physics at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 093007, [arXiv:hep-ph/0509209]

work page arXiv 2005
[15]

B. Patt, F. Wilczek, Higgs-field Portal into Hidden Sectors, [arXiv:hep-ph/0605188]

work page arXiv
[16]

O’Connell, M

D. O’Connell, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, M. B. Wise, Minimal Extension of the Standard Model Scalar Sector, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 037701, [arXiv:hep-ph/0611014]

work page arXiv 2007
[17]

Barger, P

V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, G. Shaughnessy, LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 035005, [arXiv:0706.4311]. 15

work page arXiv 2008
[18]

Singlet Higgs Phenomenology and the Electroweak Phase Transition

S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, G. Shaughnessy, Singlet Higgs Phenomenology and the Electroweak Phase Transition, JHEP 2007(8) (2007), [arXiv:0705.2425]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[19]

S. Baek, P. Ko, W.-I. Park, Search for the Higgs portal to a singlet fermionic dark matter at the LHC, JHEP 2012(2) (2012), [arXiv:1112.1847]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[20]

Robens, T

T. Robens, T. Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C75(3) (2015) 104, [arXiv:1501.02234]

work page arXiv 2015
[21]

S. I. Godunov, A. N. Rozanov, M. I. Vysotsky, E. V. Zhemchugov, Extending the Higgs sector: an extra singlet, Eur. Phys. J. C76(1) (2016) 1, [arXiv:1503.01618]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Falkowski, C

A. Falkowski, C. Gross, O. Lebedev, A second Higgs from the Higgs portal, JHEP 2015(5) (2015) 57, [arXiv:1502.01361]

work page arXiv 2015
[23]

Bertolini, M

D. Bertolini, M. McCullough, The Social Higgs, JHEP 2012(12) (2012) 118, [arXiv:1207.4209]

work page arXiv 2012
[24]

Englert, J

C. Englert, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze, M. Spannowsky, Emergence of the Electroweak Scale through the Higgs Portal, JHEP 2013(4) (2013) 60, [arXiv:1301.4224]

work page arXiv 2013
[25]

C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson, I. M. Lewis, Exploring Resonant di-Higgs Production in the Higgs Singlet Model, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 035015, [arXiv:1410.5488]

work page arXiv 2015
[26]

Costa, A

R. Costa, A. P. Morais, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos, Two-loop Stability of a Complex Singlet Extended Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 025024, [arXiv:1411.4048]

work page arXiv 2015
[27]

G. M. Pruna, T. Robens, The Higgs Singlet Extension Parameter Space in the Light of the LHC discovery, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 115012, [arXiv:1303.1150]

work page arXiv 2013
[28]

CMS Collaboration, Search for a Standard-model-like Higgs Boson with a Mass in the Range 145 to 1000 GeV at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2469, [arXiv:1304.0213]

work page arXiv 2013
[29]

J. M. No, M. Ramsey-Musolf, Probing the Higgs Portal at the LHC Through Reso- nant di-Higgs Production, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 095031, [arXiv:1310.6035]

work page arXiv 2014
[30]

Arcadi, A

G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, M. Raidal, Dark Matter through the Higgs portal, [arXiv:1903.03616]

work page arXiv 1903
[31]

Y. Ema, M. Karciauskas, O. Lebedev, S. Rusak, M. Zatta, Higgs-Inflaton Mixing and Vacuum Stability, Phys. Lett. B789 (2018) 373, [arXiv:1711.10554]

work page arXiv 2018
[33]

Alekhin, A

S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi, S. Moch, The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 214, [arXiv:1207.0980]

work page arXiv 2012
[34]

Elias-Miro, J

J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, H. M. Lee, A. Strumia, Stabilization of the Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect, JHEP 2012(6) (2012) 31, [arXiv:1203.0237]. 16

work page arXiv 2012
[35]

Lebedev, On Stability of the Electroweak Vacuum and the Higgs Portal, Eur

O. Lebedev, On Stability of the Electroweak Vacuum and the Higgs Portal, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2058, [arXiv:1203.0156]

work page arXiv 2012
[36]

Higgs boson mass and new physics

F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl, M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs boson mass and new physics, JHEP 2012(10) (2012) 140, [arXiv:1205.2893]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[37]

Lebedev, A

O. Lebedev, A. Westphal, Metastable Electroweak Vacuum: Implications for Infla- tion, Phys. Lett. B719 (2013) 415, [arXiv:1210.6987]

work page arXiv 2013
[38]

Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson

D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, G. F. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio, A. Strumia, Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP 2013(12) (2013) 89, [arXiv:1307.3536]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[39]

Lopez-Val, T

D. Lopez-Val, T. Robens, Delta r and the W-boson Mass in the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 114018, [arXiv:1406.1043]

work page arXiv 2014
[40]

A. J. Helmboldt, M. Lindner, Prospects for three-body Higgs boson decays into extra light scalars, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 055008, [arXiv:1609.08127]

work page arXiv 2017
[41]

R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022)

2022
[42]

CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of the Higgs boson width and anomalous HVV couplings from on shell and off shell production in the four lepton final state, Phys. Rev. D 99, 112003 (2019), [arXiv:1901.00174]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[43]

Djouadi, The anatomy of Electro weak symmetry breaking I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, Phys

A. Djouadi, The anatomy of Electro weak symmetry breaking I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 457, 1 (2008), [arXiv:hep-ph/0503172]

work page arXiv 2008
[44]

Aad et al., Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at √s = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment, Eur

ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at √s = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 6, [arXiv:1507.04548]

work page arXiv 2016
[45]

de Blas et al., The CLIC Potential for New Physics, CERN Yellow Reports, Vol

J. de Blas et al., The CLIC Potential for New Physics, CERN Yellow Reports, Vol. 3 (2018), [arXiv:1812.02093]

work page arXiv 2018
[46]

Franceschini, Beyond the Standard Model physics at CLIC, Int

R. Franceschini, Beyond the Standard Model physics at CLIC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35 (2020), [arXiv:1902.10125]

work page arXiv 2020
[47]

CMS Collaboration, Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, JHEP 2015(10) (2015) 144, [arXiv:1504.00936]

work page arXiv 2015
[48]

Constraining Extended Scalar Sectors at the LHC and beyond

A. Ilnicka, T. Robens, T. Stefaniak, Constraining Extended Scalar Sectors at the LHC and beyond, Mod. Phys. Lett. A33 (2018), [arXiv:1803.03594]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[49]

The BABAR Collaboration, Search for di-muon decays of a low-mass Higgs boson in radiative decays of the Y(1S), Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 059903, [arXiv:1210.0287]. 17

work page arXiv 2013
[50]

Schael et al., Search for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons at LEP, Eur

ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collabo- ration, LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Searches, S. Schael et al., Search for Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C47 (2006) 547, [arXiv:hep- ex/0602042]

work page arXiv 2006
[51]

Abbiendi et al., Decay-mode independent searches for new scalar bosons with the OPAL detector at LEP, Eur

The OPAL collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Decay-mode independent searches for new scalar bosons with the OPAL detector at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C27 (2003) 311, [arXiv:hep-ex/0206022]

work page arXiv 2003
[52]

ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb −1 of proton–proton collision data at √s = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137963, [arXiv:2301.10731]

work page arXiv 2023
[53]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset, Phys. Rep. 1116 (2025) 184–260, [arXiv:2405.04914]. 18 A Appendix: Feynman Rules The complete set of Feynman rules for the Standard Model extended by a real singlet scalar field ϕ is presented in Fig. 9. All vertex factors are calculated in...

work page arXiv 2025