pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27668 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.app-ph

Observation of attractor transitions in active magnon-polaritons under microwatt drives

Hao Wu , Qichun Liu , Yuanbin Fan , Yulong Liu , Qing Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 05:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords active magnon-polaritonsattractor transitionsnonlinear dynamicsbistabilitychaosYIGmicrowave cavitylimit cycles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Active magnon-polaritons enable low-power transitions from bistability to chaos via gain tuning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that an active magnon-polariton, created by coupling a self-oscillating microwave cavity to a yttrium iron garnet sphere, allows observation of controlled transitions among nonlinear attractors at microwatt drive powers. The feedback supplies an internal drive that, combined with Kerr and Suhl nonlinearities, produces a complex fixed-point landscape including unstable phases and a triple point. Tuning the gain leads to explosive bistability, multifrequency limit cycles, comb-like and fractal spectra, and broadband chaos. Near critical points, magnetic field changes cause switching that shifts spectra by 162 times the bare gyromagnetic response. A sympathetic reader would care because this overcomes the high-power requirement of passive systems, pointing to practical low-power nonlinear microwave technologies.

Core claim

The central discovery is that stability analysis calibrated to the active magnon-polariton system reveals phases of multiple unstable fixed points; experimentally tuning the gain across these phases produces the first observed explosive growth of bistability followed by transitions to multifrequency limit cycles, comb-like and fractal spectra, and chaotic dynamics at microwatt powers, while magnetic-field-triggered attractor switching near a critical point amplifies spectral shifts up to 162 times the bare gyromagnetic response.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the enhanced effective nonlinearity arising from Kerr frequency pulling and Suhl-mediated magnon-magnon scattering within the feedback-driven active magnon-polariton.

If this is right

  • Explosive bistability and subsequent transitions enable low-power control of nonlinear microwave emission states.
  • Attractor switching provides spectral amplification for sensitive detection applications.
  • Broadband chaotic dynamics at microwatts suggest use in low-power random signal generation.
  • The rich phase diagram supports design of devices with multiple tunable nonlinear regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending this to other ferromagnetic materials or cavity designs could lower power thresholds further for chaos.
  • The triple-point region might allow for bistable switching with minimal energy input in microwave circuits.
  • Studying quantum fluctuations near these classical attractors could bridge to quantum nonlinear dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the experimentally calibrated stability analysis fully predicts the attractor transitions without interference from unmodeled feedback loop effects, material imperfections, or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

A direct falsifier would be the absence of chaotic spectra or the lack of 162-fold spectral shifts when the magnetic field is varied near the predicted critical point at the reported microwatt powers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27668 by Hao Wu, Qichun Liu, Qing Zhao, Yuanbin Fan, Yulong Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: implies the power-dependent nonlinear attractor transi￾tions in the active MP. In Fig. 5a, we show the critical detuning in real time ∆m = ∆ 0 m − Ω, that induces the abrupt switching of the single emission tone or the evolution from the single to multiple/chaotic emission tones, shifts to the deeper neg￾ative regime as the driving power is increased beyond -30 dBm. Under -10-dBm drive, the single-frequenc… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnon-polaritons provide a room-temperature platform for investigating nonlinear cavity quantum electrodynamics in the microwave domain, but experimentally observing controlled transitions among distinct nonlinear attractors remains challenging in conventional passive systems, where strong external driving is usually required. Here we report the observation of attractor transitions in an active magnon-polariton formed by a self-oscillating microwave cavity coupled to a yttrium iron garne (YIG) sphere. The feedback loop supplies an internal microwave drive, while Kerr frequency pulling and Suhl-mediated magnon-magnon scattering produce an enhanced effective nonlinearity. Stability analysis using experimentally calibrated parameters reveals a rich fixed-point (FP) landscape with multiple unstable-FP phases and a triple-point region. By tuning gain across these phases, we observe the first experimental evidence of explosive growth of bistability, followed by transitions to multifrequency limit cycles, comb-like/fractal spectra, and broadband chaotic dynamics at microwatt powers. Near a critical point, magnetic-field-triggered switching between nonlinear emission states produces spectral shifts up to 162 times the bare gyromagnetic response. By enabling low-power attractor transitions and attractor-switching-amplified spectral response, active magnon-polaritons open opportunities for nonlinear microwave signal generation, high-precision sensing, and neuromorphic computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental observation of attractor transitions in an active magnon-polariton system formed by a self-oscillating microwave cavity coupled to a YIG sphere. Stability analysis with experimentally calibrated parameters identifies a rich fixed-point landscape featuring multiple unstable-FP phases and a triple-point region. By tuning gain, the authors observe explosive growth of bistability, transitions to multifrequency limit cycles, comb-like/fractal spectra, and broadband chaotic dynamics at microwatt powers, along with magnetic-field-triggered switching that produces spectral shifts up to 162 times the bare gyromagnetic response.

Significance. If the model-experiment correspondence is robust, the work demonstrates the first controlled observation of attractor transitions in active magnon-polaritons at microwatt drive levels, highlighting an enhanced effective nonlinearity from Kerr pulling and Suhl scattering. This could enable low-power nonlinear microwave signal generation, amplified-response sensing, and neuromorphic applications. The use of calibrated parameters to map the FP landscape is a positive feature, though the low-power claims and implications rest on verifiable independence between calibration and observation datasets.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental methods and parameter calibration] In the sections on experimental methods and parameter calibration: the manuscript does not specify data exclusion criteria, error bars on the spectral data, baseline comparisons to passive magnon-polariton systems, or how the calibration runs for the gain parameter and Kerr/Suhl coefficients were separated from the runs used to observe the attractor transitions. This separation is load-bearing because the stability analysis is invoked both to predict the sequence of phases and to interpret the same experimental spectra, creating a risk that apparent agreement is partly by construction.
  2. [Stability analysis and results] In the stability analysis and results sections: the effective model (Kerr frequency pulling plus Suhl-mediated magnon-magnon scattering) is used to generate the FP landscape and bifurcation diagram, yet the text does not quantify possible unmodeled contributions from feedback-loop delay, amplitude-dependent phase shifts, or additional cavity/YIG losses. A direct comparison of predicted versus measured bifurcation thresholds (e.g., gain values at onset of multifrequency cycles or chaos) with uncertainty bands is required to substantiate the claim that the observed dynamics follow the calibrated FP landscape without significant mismatch.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and captions] Figure captions and main text should explicitly state the microwave power levels (in µW) corresponding to each regime and include statistical information or repeated-run variability for the spectral features.
  2. [Abstract and main text] The abstract refers to 'comb-like/fractal spectra' as a single transition stage; the main text should clarify whether these are distinct regimes or overlapping, with reference to the specific figure panels that demonstrate the progression.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments identify important areas where additional clarity and quantitative validation will strengthen the presentation of our results on attractor transitions in active magnon-polaritons. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the requested details and comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the sections on experimental methods and parameter calibration: the manuscript does not specify data exclusion criteria, error bars on the spectral data, baseline comparisons to passive magnon-polariton systems, or how the calibration runs for the gain parameter and Kerr/Suhl coefficients were separated from the runs used to observe the attractor transitions. This separation is load-bearing because the stability analysis is invoked both to predict the sequence of phases and to interpret the same experimental spectra, creating a risk that apparent agreement is partly by construction.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on experimental transparency and the importance of demonstrating independence between calibration and observation datasets. We acknowledge that these procedural details were not explicitly stated in the original manuscript. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated subsection on experimental methods that specifies: data exclusion criteria (applied based on signal-to-noise ratio thresholds above 10 dB and consistency across repeated measurements); error bars on spectral data (computed as standard errors from ensembles of at least three independent acquisitions); baseline comparisons to passive magnon-polariton systems (obtained by disabling the feedback loop and recording the linear cavity response for direct contrast with the active case); and the separation of calibration runs. The gain parameter was calibrated via small-signal measurements on a dedicated set of low-power scans performed prior to the nonlinear experiments, while the Kerr and Suhl coefficients were extracted from independent power-sweep datasets collected on separate days under different drive conditions. We will include a supplementary table or figure explicitly comparing the calibration dataset to the main attractor-transition runs to confirm independence and address the concern of potential agreement by construction. These additions will make the model-experiment correspondence more robust and reproducible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the stability analysis and results sections: the effective model (Kerr frequency pulling plus Suhl-mediated magnon-magnon scattering) is used to generate the FP landscape and bifurcation diagram, yet the text does not quantify possible unmodeled contributions from feedback-loop delay, amplitude-dependent phase shifts, or additional cavity/YIG losses. A direct comparison of predicted versus measured bifurcation thresholds (e.g., gain values at onset of multifrequency cycles or chaos) with uncertainty bands is required to substantiate the claim that the observed dynamics follow the calibrated FP landscape without significant mismatch.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative validation of the bifurcation thresholds and an assessment of unmodeled effects are necessary to fully substantiate the stability analysis. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection (or appendix) that provides a direct comparison of the predicted bifurcation thresholds (gain values for the onset of multifrequency cycles, fractal spectra, and chaos) from the calibrated fixed-point landscape against the experimentally measured transition points. Uncertainty bands will be included, propagated from the standard deviations and confidence intervals of the fitted parameters (Kerr coefficient, Suhl scattering rate, and effective gain). For unmodeled contributions, we will quantify their estimated impact: feedback-loop delay is limited to a few nanoseconds in our compact microwave setup and produces phase shifts negligible compared to the observed dynamics at microwatt powers; amplitude-dependent phase shifts are bounded by the measured phase noise floor (<5°); and additional cavity/YIG losses are already folded into the effective damping rates determined during calibration. We will show that these perturbations do not shift the predicted phase boundaries outside the experimental uncertainty bands, consistent with the observed sequence of attractors matching the model. We will also discuss the sensitivity of the triple-point region to small variations in these parameters. If the referee recommends, we can include supplementary numerical simulations of an extended model incorporating explicit delay terms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental observations remain independent of the calibrated model

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is direct experimental observation of attractor transitions (bistability growth, limit cycles, comb spectra, chaos) at microwatt powers in an active magnon-polariton system, with magnetic-field-triggered switching yielding 162× spectral shifts. Stability analysis is performed with parameters stated as 'experimentally calibrated,' then used to identify phases for tuning; however, no equations or text in the provided manuscript reduce the observed spectra or transitions to a fit by construction. The calibration step is not shown to overlap with the nonlinear regime data in a way that forces the reported dynamics. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described chain. The derivation from FP landscape to observed phases is therefore not tautological; the raw spectral measurements constitute external evidence against the model rather than a renaming or self-definition of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard magnon and cavity equations plus experimentally fitted parameters for gain, coupling, and nonlinearity; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • gain parameter
    Tuned experimentally to traverse the fixed-point phases identified by stability analysis.
  • Kerr and Suhl nonlinearity coefficients
    Calibrated from separate measurements to model the effective nonlinearity in the active system.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard semiclassical equations for magnon-polariton dynamics and cavity feedback hold in the microwatt regime.
    Invoked for the stability analysis that maps the fixed-point landscape.
  • domain assumption The internal feedback drive remains stable and does not introduce extraneous instabilities beyond the modeled Kerr and Suhl terms.
    Required for attributing all observed transitions to the calibrated nonlinearity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1498 out tokens · 64625 ms · 2026-05-07T05:32:17.294296+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pin is the input microwave power

    Passive MP system In the frame rotating at the coherent drive frequency ω d, the passive system obeys ˙a = − ( κ 2 + i∆ c ) a − ig m+ η , (A1) ˙m = − ( γ 2 + i∆ m ) m − ig a− iK|m|2m, (A2) The drive amplitude is implemented via input–output theory as η = √ κ ext sin, with incident photon flux sin = √ Pin/(¯hω d) and external coupling rate κ ext (equal to κ...

  2. [2]

    (A2) and the photon mode is changed to be ˙a = ( G − κ 2 ) a − Γ |a|2a − ig m

    Active MP system For the active system , in the reference frame of the bare photon oscillation (i.e., the autonomous vdP oscillation) , the equation of the magnon mode is the same as Eq. (A2) and the photon mode is changed to be ˙a = ( G − κ 2 ) a − Γ |a|2a − ig m. (A3) Appendix B: Steady states and stability analysis

  3. [3]

    empt y- condition photons

    Steady states of the passive MP Setting ˙a = ˙m = 0 in Eqs. (A1)–(A2) yields a = η κ 2 + i∆ c + g2 γ 2 +i(∆ m+K|m|2) , m = − ig a γ 2 + i(∆ m + K|m|2) . (B1) 9 Defining the magnon occupation nm ≡ | m|2, taking the mod- ulus of Eq. (B1) reduces the steady-state condition to a real cubic polynomial in nm. We solve this cubic and retain only real, positive ro...

  4. [4]

    empty-condition photons

    Steady states of the active MP For an autonomous vdP oscillator, the relevant steady be- havior is a single-frequency solution. We therefore use the ansatz a(t) = a0 e− iΩ t , m(t) = m0 e− iΩ t , (B3) with constant complex amplitudes (a0,m0) and a real fre- quency offset Ω relative to the reference frame. Substituting Eq. (B3) into Eqs. (A2)–(A3), we obta...

  5. [5]

    (B8) This yields a 4 × 4 Jacobian matrix J (as shown in Supple- mental Material)

    Jacobian linearization and stability criterion For each steady solution of the passive and active systems, we evaluate the stability by linearizing the equations of mo - tion in the doubled complex basis[28] v = (δ a,δ a∗,δ m,δ m∗)T. (B8) This yields a 4 × 4 Jacobian matrix J (as shown in Supple- mental Material). We compute its eigenvalues {λ j} and clas...

  6. [6]

    1 are generated on a two- dimensional grid in (n0,∆ m), with ∆ m sampled linearly and n0 sampled logarithmically

    Phase-diagram construction Phase diagrams in Fig. 1 are generated on a two- dimensional grid in (n0,∆ m), with ∆ m sampled linearly and n0 sampled logarithmically. The parameters used for simulat- ing both the phase diagrams of the passive and active MP are κ = 2π × 1.5 MHz, γ = 2π × 16.5 MHz, g = 2π × 30.0 MHz, and Kerr coefficient K = 2π × 9.8 nHz. The e...

  7. [7]

    S. A. Maas, Nonlinear microwave and RF circuits (Artech house, 2003)

    2003

  8. [8]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measureme nt, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010)

    2010

  9. [9]

    Clerk, K

    A. Clerk, K. Lehnert, P . Bertet, J. Petta, and Y . Nakamura, Hy- brid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics , Nat. Phys. 16, 257 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Appl. Phys. Express 12, 070101 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    D. D. Awschalom, C. R. Du, R. He, F. J. Heremans, A. Hoff- mann, J. Hou, H. Kurebayashi, Y . Li, L. Liu, V . Novosad,et al., Quantum engineering with hybrid magnonic systems and mate- rials, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 2, 1 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    S. Khan, O. Lee, T. Dion, C. W. Zollitsch, S. Seki, Y . Tokura, J. D. Breeze, and H. Kurebayashi, Coupling microwave photons to topological spin textures in cu 2 oseo 3, Phys. Rev. B 104, L100402 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Goryachev, W

    M. Goryachev, W. G. Farr, D. L. Creedon, Y . Fan, M. Kostylev, and M. E. Tobar, High-cooperativity cavity qed with magnons at microwave frequencies, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 054002 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and mi- crowave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083603 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Suhl, The theory of ferromagnetic resonance at high signa l powers, J

    H. Suhl, The theory of ferromagnetic resonance at high signa l powers, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1, 209 (1957)

    1957

  16. [16]

    Bryant, C

    P . Bryant, C. Jeffries, and K. Nakamura, Spin-wave nonlinea r dynamics in an yttrium iron garnet sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1185 (1988)

    1988

  17. [17]

    Wiese and H

    G. Wiese and H. Benner, Multistability and chaos by parametric excitation of longwave modes in a YIG sphere, Z. Phys. B 79, 119 (1990)

    1990

  18. [18]

    O. Lee, K. Yamamoto, M. Umeda, C. W. Zollitsch, M. Elyasi, T. Kikkawa, E. Saitoh, G. E. Bauer, and H. Kurebayashi, Non- linear magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 046703 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Wagle, A

    D. Wagle, A. Rai, and M. B. Jungfleisch, Deeply non- linear magnon-photon hybrid excitation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21549 (2026). 11

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Zhang, Y

    G. Zhang, Y . Wang, and J. Y ou, Theory of the magnon kerr effect in cavity magnonics, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 987511 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Wang, G.-Q

    Y .-P . Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J. Y ou, Bistability of cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev.Lett. 120, 057202 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    H. Pan, Y . Yang, Z. An, and C.-M. Hu, Bistability in dissi- patively coupled cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054425 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Z.-X. Liu, B. Wang, H. Xiong, and Y . Wu, Magnon-induced high-order sideband generation, Opt. Lett. 43, 3698 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Z.-X. Liu, C. Y ou, B. Wang, H. Xiong, and Y . Wu, Phase- mediated magnon chaos-order transition in cavity optomagnon- ics, Opt. Lett. 44, 507 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    G.-T. Xu, Z. Shen, M. Zhang, Y . Wang, S. Wan, Y . Yang, T. Zhang, L. Bi, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, et al., Kerr-induced syn- chronization of a broadband magnon-phonon hybrid frequenc y comb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 203604 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Peng, Z.-X

    J. Peng, Z.-X. Liu, Y .-F. Y u, and H. Xiong, Cavity magnome- chanical chaos, Phys. Rev. A 110, 053704 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    G.-T. Xu, M. Zhang, Y . Wang, Z. Shen, G.-C. Guo, and C.- H. Dong, Magnonic frequency comb in the magnomechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 243601 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    B. Yao, Y . Gui, J. Rao, S. Kaur, X. Chen, W. Lu, Y . Xiao, H. Guo, K.-P . Marzlin, and C.-M. Hu, Cooperative polariton dynamics in feedback-coupled cavities, Nat. Commun. 8, 1437 (2017)

    2017

  29. [29]

    B. Yao, Y . Gui, J. Rao, Y . Zhang, W. Lu, and C.-M. Hu, Coher- ent microwave emission of gain-driven polaritons, Phys. Re v. Lett. 130, 146702 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Z.-Q. Wang, Z.-Y . Wang, Y .-P . Wang, and J. Y ou, Single-mode magnon-polariton lasing and amplification controlled by di ssi- pative coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 186704 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Z.-Y . Wang, J. Qian, Y .-P . Wang, J. Li, and J. Y ou, Realization of the unidirectional amplification in a cavity magnonic sys tem, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    B. Wang, C. Kong, Z.-X. Liu, H. Xiong, and Y . Wu, Magnetic- field-controlled magnon chaos in an active cavity-magnon sy s- tem, Laser Phys. Lett. 16, 045208 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    relaxation-oscillations

    B. V an der Pol, Lxxxviii. on “relaxation-oscillations”, Lo nd. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. 2, 978 (1926)

    1926

  34. [34]

    Khan and H

    S. Khan and H. E. T¨ ureci, Frequency combs in a lumped- element josephson-junction circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 153601 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Pastor, V

    I. Pastor, V . M. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, F. Encinas, and J. Guerra, Ordered and chaotic behavior of two coupled van der pol oscillators, Phys. Rev. E 48, 171 (1993)

    1993

  36. [36]

    Zhang, M

    C. Zhang, M. Kim, J. Wang, and C.-M. Hu, V an der pol–duffing oscillator and its application to gain-driven light-matter interac- tion, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 014034 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    W.-J. Wu, D. Xu, J. Qian, J. Li, Y .-P . Wang, and J.-Q. Y ou, Ob- servation of nonlinearity and heating-induced frequency s hifts in cavity magnonics, Chin. Phys. B 31, 127503 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Petrosyan, H

    D. Petrosyan, H. Matsumoto, H. Wang, J. B. Y oussef, R. Schlitz, W. Legrand, and P . Gambardella, Magnon kerr ef- fect in a magnetic thin film strongly coupled to a microwave resonator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22271 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Zheng, Z

    S. Zheng, Z. Wang, Y . Wang, F. Sun, Q. He, P . Yan, and H. Y uan, Tutorial: nonlinear magnonics, J. Appl. Phys. 134 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Elyasi, Y

    M. Elyasi, Y . M. Blanter, and G. E. Bauer, Resources of non- linear cavity magnonics for quantum information, Phys. Rev . B 101, 054402 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    M.-X. Bi, H. Fan, W. Wu, J.-J. He, M.-L. Hu, and X.-H. Yan, Explosive growth of bistability in a cavity magnonic system , Phys. Rev. B 111, 184309 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    R.-C. Shen, J. Li, Z.-Y . Fan, Y .-P . Wang, and J. Y ou, Mechanical bistability in kerr-modified cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 123601 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Shen, Y .-P

    R.-C. Shen, Y .-P . Wang, J. Li, S.-Y . Zhu, G. Agarwal, and J. Y ou, Long-time memory and ternary logic gate using a mul- tistable cavity magnonic system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 183202 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    P . Hyde, B. Yao, Y . Gui, G.-Q. Zhang, J. Y ou, and C.-M. Hu, Di- rect measurement of foldover in cavity magnon-polariton sy s- tems, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174423 (2018)

    2018

  45. [45]

    J. Rao, C. Wang, B. Yao, Z. Chen, K. Zhao, and W. Lu, Me- terscale strong coupling between magnons and photons, Phys . Rev. Lett. 131, 106702 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    C. Wang, J. Rao, Z. Chen, K. Zhao, L. Sun, B. Yao, T. Y u, Y .-P . Wang, and W. Lu, Enhancement of magnonic frequency combs by exceptional points, Nat. Phys. 20, 1139 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    K. Zhao, F. Yang, C. Wang, Z. Chen, J. Song, S. Ma, Z. Y ue, W. Liu, L. Sun, J. Rao, et al., Experimental observation of non- reciprocal magnonic frequency combs, AIP Adv. 15 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    J. Rao, B. Yao, C. Wang, C. Zhang, T. Y u, and W. Lu, Unveiling a pump-induced magnon mode via its strong interaction with walker modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 046705 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Y . Gui, G. Kozyniak, and C.-M. Hu, Broadband microwave emission from acoustically modulated gain-driven polarit ons, J. Appl. Phys. 137 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Carroll, L

    T. Carroll, L. Pecora, and F. Rachford, Chaos and chaotic tra n- sients in an yttrium iron garnet sphere, Phys. Rev. A 40, 377 (1989)

    1989

  51. [51]

    Mitsudo, M

    S. Mitsudo, M. Mino, and H. Yamazaki, Period-doubling cas- cade and chaos in YIG at the first-order suhl instability, J. M agn. Magn. Mater. 104, 1057 (1992)

    1992

  52. [52]

    R¨ odelsperger, Y

    F. R¨ odelsperger, Y . S. Kivshar, and H. Benner, Route out of chaos by hf parametric perturbations in spin-wave instabil ities, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140, 1953 (1995)

    1953

  53. [53]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for supercon- ducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum c om- putation, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004)

    2004

  54. [54]

    H. Wang, K. Jacobs, D. Fahey, Y . Hu, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Exceptional sensitivity near the bistable trans ition point of a hybrid quantum system, Nat. Phys. 22, 577 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    H. Wang, K. Jacobs, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Ultralow-power microwave frequency comb at a bistable phas e transition, Phys. Rev. X 16, 021005 (2026)

    2026

  56. [56]

    S. A. Khan, Non-equilibrium quantum dynamics of nonlinear multimode circuit QED systems (Princeton University, 2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    X. Mi, J. Rao, L. Yan, X. Wang, B. Lyu, B. Yao, S. Yan, and L. Bai, Ultrasensitive magnetometer based on cusp points of the photon-magnon synchronization mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 066701 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    A. V . Chumak, P . Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adelmann, A. O. Adeyeye, J. ˚Akerman, F. G. Aliev, A. Anane, A. Awad, et al. , Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave comput- ing, IEEE Trans. Magn. 58, 1 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    A. Kani, M. Hatifi, and J. Twamley, Squeezed microwave and magnonic frequency combs, APL Quantum 2 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equatio ns and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985)

    1985