pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00286 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.chem-ph

Unified approach to time-resolved x-ray and electron diffraction imaging

Mingrui Yuan , Nikolay V. Golubev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords unified formalismtime-resolved x-ray diffractionultrafast electron diffractionquantum field theorygrapheneelectron dynamicsrelativistic couplingsdiffraction imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unified quantum-field-theory approach describes both time-resolved x-ray and electron diffraction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a common quantum-field-based formalism for time-resolved x-ray diffraction and ultrafast electron diffraction. This replaces separate theoretical frameworks with one that treats both consistently. A reader would care because it reveals the direct correspondence between the two methods and simplifies adding effects such as relativistic couplings. The formalism is tested by modeling laser-driven dynamics in graphene, showing how diffraction can probe intricate quantum processes.

Core claim

Starting from quantum fields, the authors derive a unified description that permits consistent consideration of TR-XRD and TR-UED. This elucidates the correspondence between them and allows similarities and differences to be systematically disentangled. Additional physical effects, including relativistic charge-current and current-current couplings, can be incorporated straightforwardly. The approach is applied to simulate diffraction measurements of laser-driven electron dynamics in graphene.

What carries the argument

The quantum-field-based common theoretical formalism for ultrafast diffraction imaging

Load-bearing premise

The quantum-field-theory starting point together with the chosen interaction terms remains valid and sufficient in the ultrafast regimes and for materials such as graphene.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the unified formalism's predictions and combined experimental data from TR-XRD and TR-UED on laser-driven graphene, especially regarding relativistic effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00286 by Mingrui Yuan, Nikolay V. Golubev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Laser-driven electron dynamics in graphene. Top panel: The blue curve represents the vector potential of the pump [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Simulated electron diffraction measurements prob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-resolved x-ray diffraction (TR-XRD) and ultrafast electron diffraction (TR-UED) are emerging tools for probing ultrafast quantum dynamics. From a theoretical perspective, they are commonly described within different frameworks and modeled using distinct approximations. Here, we present a unified quantum-field-based description of ultrafast diffraction imaging that permits consistent consideration of TR-XRD and TR-UED within a common theoretical formalism. Our approach elucidates the correspondence between TR-XRD and TR-UED and allows their similarities and differences to be systematically disentangled. The developed formalism is sufficiently general to consistently and straightforwardly incorporate additional physical effects of interest, such as relativistic charge-current and current-current couplings. We apply our approach to simulate diffraction measurements of laser-driven electron dynamics in graphene, demonstrating the unique capabilities of diffraction imaging to unravel intricate quantum processes in matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a unified quantum-field-theory (QFT) based formalism for describing time-resolved x-ray diffraction (TR-XRD) and ultrafast electron diffraction (TR-UED). It claims this common framework elucidates the correspondence between the techniques, permits systematic disentangling of their similarities and differences, straightforwardly incorporates additional effects such as relativistic charge-current and current-current couplings, and is demonstrated via simulations of laser-driven electron dynamics in graphene.

Significance. If the derivations are internally consistent, the work would offer a useful common platform for two complementary ultrafast diffraction methods that are typically treated with separate approximations. The generality for including relativistic couplings and the concrete graphene application could help advance consistent modeling of quantum dynamics in materials.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the formalism 'permits consistent consideration' and 'elucidates the correspondence,' but without an explicit statement of the key mapping or reduction between the TR-XRD and TR-UED limits (e.g., in the non-relativistic or far-field regime), it is difficult to assess how the unification is achieved.
  2. The claim that the approach is 'sufficiently general to consistently and straightforwardly incorporate additional physical effects' would benefit from a brief outline of the interaction Hamiltonian or the perturbative order at which the relativistic terms enter, to allow readers to judge the scope.
  3. In the graphene simulation section, the specific laser parameters, pulse durations, and momentum transfers used for the diffraction patterns should be tabulated or clearly referenced so that the results can be reproduced or compared with existing literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of its contributions, and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's comments confirm that the unified QFT formalism offers a useful common platform for TR-XRD and TR-UED. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives a unified QFT-based formalism for TR-XRD and TR-UED from standard quantum field theory starting points, then applies it to graphene simulations. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central unification and correspondence are presented as derived outputs rather than inputs. The formalism is described as general enough to add relativistic couplings without circularity. This is the expected non-finding for a methods paper whose claims rest on explicit construction rather than re-labeling of data fits.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard quantum-field-theory axioms for photon and electron fields plus domain assumptions about the validity of the diffraction imaging regime; no new free parameters or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory provides a consistent starting point for both x-ray and electron diffraction
    Invoked as the basis for the unified formalism in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1069 out tokens · 23867 ms · 2026-05-09T19:38:26.111845+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 163 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Krausz, Physica Scripta91, 063011 (2016)

    F. Krausz, Physica Scripta91, 063011 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    X. Hu, K. F. Mak, J. Zhang, Z. Wei, and F. Krausz, Light: Science & Applications15, 24 (2026)

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, Ch. Spielmann, G. A. Rei- der, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinz- mann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Nature414, 509 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Mairesse and F

    Y. Mairesse and F. Quéré, Physical Review A71, 011401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Itatani, F

    J. Itatani, F. Quéré, G. L. Yudin, M. Yu. Ivanov, F. Krausz, and P. B. Corkum, Physical Review Letters 88, 173903 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Science292, 1689 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Mairesse, A

    Y. Mairesse, A. De Bohan, L. J. Frasinski, H. Merdji, L. C. Dinu, P. Monchicourt, P. Breger, M. Kovačev, R. Taïeb, B. Carré, H. G. Muller, P. Agostini, and P. Salieres, Science302, 1540 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    P. M. Kraus, B. Mignolet, D. Baykusheva, A. Ru- penyan, L. Horny, E. F. Penka, G. Grassi, O. I. Tol- stikhin, J. Schneider, F. Jensen, L. B. Madsen, A. D. Bandrauk, F. Remacle, and H. J. Wörner, Science350, 790 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Gruson, L

    V. Gruson, L. Barreau, Á. Jiménez-Galan, F. Risoud, J. Caillat, A. Maquet, B. Carré, F. Lepetit, J.-F. Her- gott, T. Ruchon, L. Argenti, R. Taïeb, F. Martín, and P. Salières, Science354, 734 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Calegari, D

    F. Calegari, D. Ayuso, A. Trabattoni, L. Belshaw, S. De Camillis, S. Anumula, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, A. Palacios, P. Decleva, J. B. Greenwood, F. Martin, and M. Nisoli, Science346, 336 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Sansone, F

    G. Sansone, F. Kelkensberg, J. F. Pérez-Torres, F. Morales, M. F. Kling, W. Siu, O. Ghafur, P. Johns- son, M. Swoboda, E. Benedetti, F. Ferrari, F. Lépine, J. L. Sanz-Vicario, S. Zherebtsov, I. Znakovskaya, A. L’Huillier, M. Yu. Ivanov, M. Nisoli, F. Martín, and M. J. J. Vrakking, Nature465, 763 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Goulielmakis, Z.-H

    E. Goulielmakis, Z.-H. Loh, A. Wirth, R. Santra, N. Rohringer, V. S. Yakovlev, S. Zherebtsov, T. Pfeifer, A. M. Azzeer, M. F. Kling, S. R. Leone, and F. Krausz, Nature466, 739 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    D. T. Matselyukh, V. Despré, N. V. Golubev, A. I. Kuleff, and H. J. Wörner, Nature Physics18, 1206 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Chakraborty, M

    N. Chakraborty, M. A. Alarcón, M. P. McDonnell, K.Hauser, I.Shalaby, D.Biswas, J.K.Wood, N.V.Gol- ubev, and A. Sandhu, Physical Review A113, 023104 (2026)

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    X. Gong, S. Heck, D. Jelovina, C. Perry, K. Zinchenko, R. Lucchese, and H. J. Wörner, Nature609, 507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Jordan, M

    I. Jordan, M. Huppert, D. Rattenbacher, M. Peper, D. Jelovina, C. Perry, A. Von Conta, A. Schild, and H. J. Wörner, Science369, 974 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    R.Borrego-Varillas, M.Lucchini,andM.Nisoli,Reports on Progress in Physics85, 066401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    D. Hui, H. Alqattan, S. Yamada, V. Pervak, K. Yabana, and M. T. Hassan, Nature Photonics16, 33 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    J. M. Cowley,Diffraction Physics, 3rd ed., North- Holland Personal Library (Elsevier Science B.V, Am- 26 sterdam ; New York, 1995)

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Schlichting and J

    I. Schlichting and J. Miao, Current Opinion in Struc- tural Biology22, 613 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Colliex, J

    C. Colliex, J. M. Cowley, S. L. Dudarev, M. Fink, J. Gjønnes, R. Hilderbrandt, A. Howie, D. F. Lynch, L. M. Peng, G. Ren, A. W. Ross, V. H. Smith, J. C. H. Spence, J. W. Steeds, J. Wang, M. J. Whelan, and B. B. Zvyagin, inInternational Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C, edited by H. Fuess, Th. Hahn, H. Wondratschek, U. Müller, U. Shmueli, E. Prince, A. A...

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    C. B. Carter,Transmission Electron Microscopy: Diffraction, Imaging, and Spectrometry, 1st ed. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, NY, 2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    M. Th. Hassan, J. S. Baskin, B. Liao, and A. H. Zewail, Nature Photonics11, 425 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    M. T. Hassan, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics51, 032005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bost- edt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Cof- fee, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, D. Dowell, S. Edstrom, A. Fisher, J. Frisch, S. Gilevich, J. Hastings, G. Hays, Ph. Hering, Z. Huang, R. Iverson, H. Loos, M. Messer- schmidt, A. Miahnahri, S. Moeller, H.-D. Nuhn, G. Pile, D. Ratner, J. Rzepiela, D. Schultz, T. ...

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Pellegrini, A

    C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 015006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Young, K

    L. Young, K. Ueda, M. Gühr, P. H. Bucksbaum, M. Si- mon, S. Mukamel, N. Rohringer, K. C. Prince, C. Mas- ciovecchio, M. Meyer, A. Rudenko, D. Rolles, C. Bost- edt, M. Fuchs, D. A. Reis, R. Santra, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, H. Ibrahim, F. Légaré, M. Vrakking, M. Isinger, D. Kroon, M. Gisselbrecht, A. L’Huillier, H. J. Wörner, and S. R. Leone, Journal of Phys...

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    E. Fill, L. Veisz, A. Apolonski, and F. Krausz, New Journal of Physics8, 272 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Hommelhoff, C

    P. Hommelhoff, C. Kealhofer, and M. A. Kasevich, Physical Review Letters97, 247402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    Baum and A

    P. Baum and A. H. Zewail, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104, 18409 (2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    S. A. Hilbert, C. Uiterwaal, B. Barwick, H. Batelaan, and A. H. Zewail, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106, 10558 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Kealhofer, W

    C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Science352, 429 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Zheng, D

    J. Zheng, D. Su, X. He, F. X. Kärtner, and D. Zhang, Science Advances12, eaec0008 (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Kozák, J

    M. Kozák, J. McNeur, K. J. Leedle, H. Deng, N. Schö- nenberger, A. Ruehl, I. Hartl, J. S. Harris, R. L. Byer, and P. Hommelhoff, Nature Communications8, 14342 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Morimoto and P

    Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Nature Physics14, 252 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Morimoto and P

    Y. Morimoto and P. Baum, Physical Review Letters 125, 193202 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    D. Hui, H. Alqattan, M. Sennary, N. V. Golubev, and M. T. Hassan, Science Advances10, eadp5805 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    J. Yang, X. Zhu, T. J. A. Wolf, Z. Li, J. P. F. Nunes, R.Coffee, J.P.Cryan, M.Gühr, K.Hegazy, T.F.Heinz, K. Jobe, R. Li, X. Shen, T. Veccione, S. Weathersby, K. J. Wilkin, C. Yoneda, Q. Zheng, T. J. Martinez, M. Centurion, and X. Wang, Science361, 64 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    T. J. A. Wolf, D. M. Sanchez, J. Yang, R. M. Parrish, J. P. F. Nunes, M. Centurion, R. Coffee, J. P. Cryan, M. Gühr, K. Hegazy, A. Kirrander, R. K. Li, J. Rud- dock, X. Shen, T. Vecchione, S. P. Weathersby, P. M. Weber, K. Wilkin, H. Yong, Q. Zheng, X. J. Wang, M. P. Minitti, and T. J. Martínez, Nature Chemistry 11, 504 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Y. Liu, S. L. Horton, J. Yang, J. P. F. Nunes, X. Shen, T. J. A. Wolf, R. Forbes, C. Cheng, B. Moore, M. Centurion, K. Hegazy, R. Li, M.-F. Lin, A. Stolow, P. Hockett, T. Rozgonyi, P. Marquetand, X. Wang, and T. Weinacht, Physical Review X10, 021016 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    J. Yang, X. Zhu, J. P. F. Nunes, J. K. Yu, R. M. Parrish, T. J. A. Wolf, M. Centurion, M. Gühr, R. Li, Y. Liu, B. Moore, M. Niebuhr, S. Park, X. Shen, S. Weathersby, T. Weinacht, T. J. Martinez, and X. Wang, Science368, 885 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    E. G. Champenois, N. H. List, M. Ware, M. Britton, P. H. Bucksbaum, X. Cheng, M. Centurion, J. P. Cryan, R. Forbes, I. Gabalski, K. Hegazy, M. C. Hoffmann, A. J. Howard, F. Ji, M.-F. Lin, J. P. F. Nunes, X. Shen, J. Yang, X. Wang, T. J. Martinez, and T. J. A. Wolf, Physical Review Letters131, 143001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Jiang, J

    H. Jiang, J. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Peng, C. Jin, X. Zou, P. Zhu, T. Jiang, Z. Lan, H. Yong, F. He, and D. Xiang, Nature Communications16, 6703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Coppens, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry43, 663 (1992)

    P. Coppens, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry43, 663 (1992)

    work page 1992

  46. [46]

    Coppens,X-Ray Charge Densities and Chemical Bonding, International Union of Crystallography Texts on Crystallography No

    P. Coppens,X-Ray Charge Densities and Chemical Bonding, International Union of Crystallography Texts on Crystallography No. 4 (International Union of Crys- tallography ; Oxford University Press, [Chester, Eng- land] : Oxford ; New York, 1997)

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    J. M. Cowley and International Union of Crystallogra- phy, eds.,Electron Diffraction Techniques: Vol.1, Ox- ford Scholarship Online (International Union of Crys- tallography, Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar, 1993)

    work page 1993

  48. [48]

    J. M. Cowley and International Union of Crystallogra- phy, eds.,Electron Diffraction Techniques: Vol.2, Ox- ford Scholarship Online (International Union of Crys- tallography, Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar, 1993)

    work page 1993

  49. [49]

    Santra, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics42, 023001 (2009)

    R. Santra, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics42, 023001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    J.CaoandK.R.Wilson,TheJournalofPhysicalChem- istry A102, 9523 (1998)

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    11 (Oxford Univ

    A.Authier,Dynamical Theory of X-ray Diffraction,repr ed., Monographs on Crystallography No. 11 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Shao and A

    H.-C. Shao and A. F. Starace, Physical Review Letters 105, 263201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    P. Baum, J. Manz, and A. Schild, Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy53, 987 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    H. J. Suominen and A. Kirrander, Physical Review Let- ters112, 043002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    V. S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, F. Krausz, and P. Baum, Scientific Reports5, 14581 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Centurion, T

    M. Centurion, T. J. Wolf, and J. Yang, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry73, 21 (2022). 27

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Santra, G

    R. Santra, G. Dixit, and J. M. Slowik, Physical Review Letters113, 189301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Robicheaux, Physical Review A62, 062706 (2000)

    F. Robicheaux, Physical Review A62, 062706 (2000)

    work page 2000

  59. [59]

    Tanaka, V

    S. Tanaka, V. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Physical Re- view A63, 063405 (2001)

    work page 2001

  60. [60]

    Bennett, J

    K. Bennett, J. D. Biggs, Y. Zhang, K. E. Dorfman, and S. Mukamel, The Journal of Chemical Physics140, 204311 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Dixit, O

    G. Dixit, O. Vendrell, and R. Santra, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 11636 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Dixit and R

    G. Dixit and R. Santra, The Journal of Chemical Physics138, 134311 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Dixit, J

    G. Dixit, J. M. Slowik, and R. Santra, Physical Review Letters110, 137403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    J. D. Biggs, K. Bennett, Y. Zhang, and S. Mukamel, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47, 124037 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    Dixit, J

    G. Dixit, J. M. Slowik, and R. Santra, Physical Review A89, 043409 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Popova-Gorelova and R

    D. Popova-Gorelova and R. Santra, Physical Review B 91, 184303 (2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Popova-Gorelova and R

    D. Popova-Gorelova and R. Santra, Physical Review B 92, 184304 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    J. R. Rouxel, M. Kowalewski, and S. Mukamel, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation12, 3959 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Dixit and R

    G. Dixit and R. Santra, Physical Review A96, 053413 (2017)

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Grosser, J

    M. Grosser, J. M. Slowik, and R. Santra, Physical Re- view A95, 062107 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    M.Kowalewski, K.Bennett,andS.Mukamel,Structural Dynamics4, 054101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Moreno Carrascosa and A

    A. Moreno Carrascosa and A. Kirrander, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics19, 19545 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    Bennett, M

    K. Bennett, M. Kowalewski, J. R. Rouxel, and S. Mukamel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 6538 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    D. Cho, J. R. Rouxel, M. Kowalewski, J. Y. Lee, and S. Mukamel, Journal of Chemical Theory and Compu- tation14, 329 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    D.Popova-Gorelova, D.A.Reis,andR.Santra,Physical Review B98, 224302 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Simmermacher, N

    M. Simmermacher, N. E. Henriksen, K. B. Møller, A. Moreno Carrascosa, and A. Kirrander, Physical Re- view Letters122, 073003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Simmermacher, A

    M. Simmermacher, A. Moreno Carrascosa, N. E. Hen- riksen, K. B. Møller, and A. Kirrander, The Journal of Chemical Physics151, 174302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Hermann, V

    G. Hermann, V. Pohl, G. Dixit, and J. C. Tremblay, Physical Review Letters124, 013002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Allum, K

    F. Allum, K. Amini, M. Ashfold, D. Bansal, R. J. F. Berger, M. Centurion, G. Dixit, D. Durham, E. Fasshauer, J. P. Figueira Nunes, I. Fischer, G. Grell, M. Ivanov, A. Kirrander, O. Kornilov, C. Kut- tner, K. Lopata, L. Ma, V. Makhija, A. Maxwell, A. Moreno Carrascosa, A. Natan, D. Neumark, S. Pratt, A. Röder, D. Rolles, J. M. Rost, T. Sekikawa, M. Sim- me...

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    S. Giri, J. C. Tremblay, and G. Dixit, Physical Review A104, 053115 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.