Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A Universal Dance of Galactic Disks: Ubiquitous Precession and Its Implications

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-01 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Galactic disks precess due to external tidal torques from anisotropic matter within 30 kpc.

desk verdict TNG galaxies show common disk precession tied to tidal torques within 30 kpc, with links to warps and alignments, but the Milky Way rate is scaled to observations and torque validation is not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.00349 v2 pith:MRPJSSL2 submitted 2026-05-01 astro-ph.GA

Yuan Wang , Xiong Luo , Huiyuan Wang , Enci Wang , Hao Li , Federico Marinacci , Xuejian Shen , Mark Vogelsberger This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galacticdisksdiskprecessiontidaltorquesgalaxyevolutiongaswarpssatellitealignmentMilkyWaycosmologicalsimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses cosmological simulations to trace how Milky Way-like galaxies change their spin orientation over time. It establishes that disk precession occurs in most galaxies, driven by tidal forces from uneven matter distributions nearby. This process is strong at early times and persists today, leading to observable gas warps, orbital heating of stars, and alignment patterns among satellite galaxies. A sympathetic reader would care because these dynamics connect external environment to the internal structure and long-term fate of disk galaxies.

What carries the argument

External tidal torque from anisotropic matter distribution within 30 kpc, which drives changes in galactic disk spin orientation over time.

What would settle it

A direct kinematic measurement of the Milky Way disk precession rate that falls well outside the range of 3-10 degrees per billion years.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Leveraging the IllustrisTNG simulations, the authors trace the evolution of spin orientation in Milky Way-like galaxies over cosmic time. They find that disk precession is ubiquitous in galaxies and significantly affects galaxy evolution. The precession is driven by the external tidal torque originating from the anisotropic matter distribution within 30 kpc, and is violent at z > 1 and becomes gentler but significant at z ~ 0. Disk precession can induce significant cold gas warp, which is often observed in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. The Milky Way is predicted to precess at a rate of ≃3-10 degrees per billion years at the current epoch based on its observed warp.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations accurately capture the external tidal torques and resulting precession without significant numerical artifacts or missing baryonic physics that would alter the torque field or disk response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Disk precession induces significant cold gas warps observed in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies.
  • Violent precession heats stellar orbits and may produce prolate elliptical galaxies.
  • Tidal torque from central galaxies causes precession and radial alignment in satellite galaxy disks.
  • Precession of accreted cold gas streams, regulated by galaxy torque, is crucial for disk galaxy evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Observed warp angles in large galaxy samples could map local tidal fields without needing full dynamical modeling.
  • External torques may set a floor on disk stability that internal feedback models alone cannot reproduce.
  • If precession contributes to elliptical formation, the required merger fraction in simulations could be revised downward.
  • Future integral-field surveys could test whether precession rates correlate with local galaxy density as predicted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses IllustrisTNG cosmological simulations to trace the spin evolution of Milky Way-like galactic disks, claiming that disk precession is ubiquitous, driven by external tidal torques from anisotropic matter within 30 kpc. Precession is reported as violent at z>1 and gentler at z~0, inducing cold gas warps; the authors predict a Milky Way precession rate of ≃3-10 deg/Gyr based on its observed warp, suggest it can heat stellar orbits toward prolate ellipticals, explain radial alignments of satellites, and regulate accreted gas streams for disk evolution.

Significance. If the simulation-based results on torque-driven precession hold after validation, the work would identify a previously under-appreciated dynamical mechanism in galaxy evolution with direct links to observed warps, satellite alignments, and morphological changes. The cosmological simulation approach allows self-consistent gravitational interactions, which is a methodological strength, but the absence of shown torque decompositions, disk identification criteria, and convergence tests limits the current significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The Milky Way precession rate of ≃3-10 deg/Gyr is obtained by scaling simulation results to match the observed warp amplitude. This reduces the quoted 'prediction' to a post-hoc normalization rather than an independent forecast from the torque model, undermining the claim of a first-principles result.
  2. [Simulation analysis (implied in abstract)] The central attribution of precession to external tidal torques from anisotropic matter within 30 kpc rests entirely on time evolution of spin vectors extracted from TNG MW-like galaxies, yet the manuscript provides no details on disk identification criteria, spin vector tracking method, or torque measurement/decomposition procedure. Without these, the driver identification cannot be evaluated.
  3. [Methods (implied)] No convergence tests, resolution studies, or cross-code comparisons are described for the gravity solver, subgrid baryonic physics effects on matter anisotropy, or numerical diffusion in spin orientation measurements. This is load-bearing because the ubiquity claim and torque attribution depend on the fidelity of the TNG torque fields.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states precession 'significantly affects galaxy evolution' without quantifying the effect size (e.g., fraction of orbital heating or warp amplitude induced).
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the 30 kpc scale and redshift ranges is clear, but the transition from 'violent' to 'gentler' precession lacks a quantitative threshold or plot reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below, indicating revisions where the manuscript will be updated for greater clarity and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The Milky Way precession rate of ≃3-10 deg/Gyr is obtained by scaling simulation results to match the observed warp amplitude. This reduces the quoted 'prediction' to a post-hoc normalization rather than an independent forecast from the torque model, undermining the claim of a first-principles result.

    Authors: We agree that the quoted Milky Way precession rate is obtained by scaling the simulation-derived torque statistics to the observed warp amplitude, rather than constituting an independent first-principles forecast. In the revised manuscript we will rephrase the abstract to describe this quantity as an 'estimated' rate informed by the torque model and the observed warp, removing any implication of a pure prediction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation analysis (implied in abstract)] The central attribution of precession to external tidal torques from anisotropic matter within 30 kpc rests entirely on time evolution of spin vectors extracted from TNG MW-like galaxies, yet the manuscript provides no details on disk identification criteria, spin vector tracking method, or torque measurement/decomposition procedure. Without these, the driver identification cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We accept that the current text lacks sufficient methodological detail. The revised version will add an explicit Methods subsection specifying: (i) disk selection via a stellar circularity threshold (>0.5) combined with morphological criteria from the TNG catalogs; (ii) spin-vector computation as the total angular momentum of star particles within two effective radii; and (iii) torque decomposition obtained by summing gravitational forces from all particles inside 30 kpc after subtracting the self-torque of the central disk. These additions will allow direct evaluation of the external-torque attribution. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods (implied)] No convergence tests, resolution studies, or cross-code comparisons are described for the gravity solver, subgrid baryonic physics effects on matter anisotropy, or numerical diffusion in spin orientation measurements. This is load-bearing because the ubiquity claim and torque attribution depend on the fidelity of the TNG torque fields.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of dedicated convergence tests for spin orientation within this study. The revised manuscript will include a short discussion referencing the extensive resolution and convergence tests already published for the TNG suite (Pillepich et al. 2018 and subsequent TNG papers) and noting that the precession signal remains consistent across the TNG100 and TNG300 volumes. New resolution runs or cross-code comparisons lie outside the present scope but could be addressed in follow-up work; we therefore mark this revision as partial. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

MW precession 'prediction' reduces to scaling simulation results to match observed warp

  1. fitted input called prediction [abstract]
    "We predict that the Milky Way is precessing at a rate of ≃3-10 degrees per billion years at current epoch based on its observed warp."

    The quoted rate is obtained by scaling the TNG-derived precession statistics to reproduce the amplitude of the observed Milky Way warp. This makes the numerical value a fitted normalization to the target datum rather than an independent forecast from the simulation torque field or first-principles torque calculation.

full rationale

The paper derives ubiquity of disk precession and its torque origin from direct tracking of spin vectors in IllustrisTNG galaxies; this is an empirical measurement from simulation output and does not reduce to its own inputs. The sole circular step is the Milky Way rate claim, which the abstract explicitly ties to scaling against the observed warp. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or self-definitional equations appear in the provided text. The result is therefore partially circular only in the specific 'prediction' step.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that IllustrisTNG's gravity solver and subgrid physics produce realistic external torques on disks; no independent verification of torque accuracy is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • precession rate scaling to observed warp
    The 3-10 deg/Gyr Milky Way prediction is obtained by matching simulation precession to the observed warp amplitude, introducing a normalization constant.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption External tidal torque from matter within 30 kpc dominates disk orientation change
    Invoked to explain the driver of precession; no alternative internal mechanisms are quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Universal Dance of Galactic Disks: Ubiquitous Precession and Its Implications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MRPJSSL2

@misc{pith2026260500349,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Universal Dance of Galactic Disks: Ubiquitous Precession and Its Implications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MRPJSSL2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.00349}
}
abstract

Precession is a very common phenomenon for small-scale astronomical objects. However, the precession of galactic disks, occurring on a scale larger than kilo-parsec, has barely been studied in the literature. Quantifying this precession in observations remains challenging due to the lack of high-resolution dynamical data. Cosmological simulations, where gravitational interactions are self-consistently modeled, offer a unique avenue for investigating disk precession. Leveraging the IllustrisTNG simulations, we trace the evolution of spin orientation in Milky Way-like galaxies over cosmic time. We find that disk precession is ubiquitous in galaxies and significantly affects galaxy evolution. The precession is driven by the external tidal torque originating from the anisotropic matter distribution within $30\ \mathrm{kpc}$, and is violent at $\mathrm{z} > 1$ and becomes gentler but significant at $\mathrm{z} \sim 0$, when the disks are considered dynamically settled. Disk precession can induce significant cold gas warp, which is often observed in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. We predict that the Milky Way is precessing at a rate of $\simeq3-10$ degrees per billion years at current epoch based on its observed warp. Violent precession can heat the orbits of stars, which may eventually produce prolate elliptical galaxies. The tidal torque from central galaxies can cause the precession of nearby satellite galaxies and causes their disks to point towards the centrals, which explains the observational radial alignment. We also find that the precession of accreted cold gas stream, regulated by the galaxies' torque, is crucial for the evolution of disk galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00349 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Disk precession illustrated through a representative Milky Way–analog galaxy (m∗ = 1.6 × 1010 M⊙, Subhalo ID 377137) gravitationally interacting with a satellite companion (m∗ = 4.0×108 M⊙; Subhalo ID 377138). We show the projected stellar distributions in the x–y and x–z planes for five consecutive snapshots (cosmic times indicated in the upper panels). All panels share the same coordinate system as that in the cen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Precession rate ΩL as a function of tdisk for the selected galaxies with the color-coding specific halo accretion rate, defined as ∆ log(m200c)/∆t. The halo mass m200c is the mass within a spherical region, within which the mean density is 200 times the critical density. The precession rates, ΩL, are calculated between consecutive snapshots during the selected disk stage and averaged over this 1 Gyr disk period. The… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left panel: Probability density distribution of the cosine of the angle between the tidal torque direction and the precession direction. The orange line represents torques from all satellite subhalos (m∗,sat ≥ 108M⊙) within 100 kpc, to ensure the accuracy of our measurements, we apply a selection threshold to the torque values (see Appendix B). The blue line shows the torques from all matter within the same radius. … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper left panel: The precession rate as a function of the warp angle for the selected galaxies. Both quantities are averaged over the one-Gyr disk period. The solid circles show the galaxies with tdisk ≥ 8 Gyr while the open triangles for galaxies with tdisk < 8 Gyr. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left panel: The projected spatial distribution of satellites within 100 kpc to the centrals by stacking satellites around each central disk galaxy across all selected snapshots. The size of the symbols correspond to the mass ratio between satellites and centrals. The x…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The evolution of the AM vectors for gas elements of two disk galaxies. We trace the evolution of the angle (α star gas ) between the AM vectors of gas elements and the spin direction of stellar component at z = 0. The left Subplot of each panel illustrates the evolutio…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Projected trajectories of spin vectors for six selected typical galaxies. The z-axis(x-axis) of the coordinate system is aligned with the spin vector (precession direction) of a galaxy at tdisk. Each trajectory shows the evolution of (x, y) components of the unit spin …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The relation between < ΩMx /ΩL > and tdisk. < ΩMx /ΩL > is the averaged ratio of the projected torque-induced precession rate (ΩMx ) to the precession rate (ΩL). The results are averaged over the disk period. The short line segments at the edges denote outliers. The me…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cold gas warp for a galaxy (Subid 482892 in Snap 82). Left panel shows the density map in face-on projection and right panel shows the map in edge-on projection. The x axis aligns with the warp direction (see Appendix C). The white cycle indicate 2re, black curve in th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Relationship between the axis ratios b/a and c/a for dynamically hot galaxies at z = 0. Black circles represent the dynamic hot galaxies in our sample, whose evolution is driven by strong precession, while the blue crosses denote the merger-dominated dynamic hot galax…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic diagram of a coordinate system established with the x–y plane in the disk plane, and the z-axis along the direction of central galaxy AM. A satellite galaxy is located in the y–z plane, where R denotes the distance from the central galaxy and β is the polar …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Theoretical calculations for the precession of disk induced by the tidal torque from a satellite system using Eq. F10 (solid lines) and Eq. F11 (far-field approximation, dotted lines). The left panel shows ΩM as a function of β, while the right panel is for variable R…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Warped Disk Galaxies: Alignment with the Large-Scale Tidal Field

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Warped galaxies show excess intermediate-angle alignments with the tidal t1 direction versus non-warped galaxies, consistent with disk-halo misalignment torques producing warps.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Simulations of Galaxy Formation in a Λ Cold Dark Matter Universe. II. The Fine Structure of Simulated Galactic Disks

    Abadi, M. G., Navarro, J. F., Steinmetz, M., & Eke, V. R. 2003, ApJ, 597, 21, doi: 10.1086/378316

    work page doi:10.1086/378316 2003

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Allgood, B., Flores, R. A., Primack, J. R., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1781, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10094.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10094.x 2006

  3. [3]

    B., Park J

    Ann, H. B., & Park, J.-C. 2006, NewA, 11, 293, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2005.08.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2005.08.006 2006

  4. [4]

    Shaping the Milky Way: The interplay of mergers and cosmic filaments

    Arora, A., Garavito-Camargo, N., Sanderson, R. E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.20133, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.20133

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.20133 2025

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06504.x , keywords =

    Athanassoula, E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x 2003

  6. [6]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.21703 , url =

    Benitez-Llambay, A. 2015, py-sphviewer: Py-SPHViewer v1.0.0, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.21703

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.21703 2015

  7. [7]

    E., & Frenk, C

    Bett, P. E., & Frenk, C. S. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1338, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1395

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1395 2016

  8. [8]

    Bosma, Astron

    Bosma, A. 1981, AJ, 86, 1825, doi: 10.1086/113063

    work page doi:10.1086/113063 1981

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Briggs, F. H. 1990, ApJ, 352, 15, doi: 10.1086/168512

    1990 doi

  2. [10]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 320, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0686-7

    Chen, X., Wang, S., Deng, L., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 320, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0686-7

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv270

    Primack, J. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv270

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    P., & Sellwood, J

    Debattista, V. P., & Sellwood, J. A. 1999, ApJL, 513, L107, doi: 10.1086/311913

    1999 doi

  5. [13]

    Diemer, B., Stevens, A. R. H., Lagos, C. d. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1529, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1323

    2019 doi

  6. [15]

    C., Slone, O., Lisanti, M., & Cohen, T

    Dodge, B. C., Slone, O., Lisanti, M., & Cohen, T. 2023b, MNRAS, 518, 2870, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3249

    doi

  7. [16]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 1930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2482

    El-Badry, K., Quataert, E., Wetzel, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 1930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2482

    2018 doi

  8. [17]

    2007, ApJL, 662, L71, doi: 10.1086/519683 18 Garc´ ıa-Conde, B., Antoja, T., Roca-F` abrega, S., et al

    Faltenbacher, A., Li, C., Mao, S., et al. 2007, ApJL, 662, L71, doi: 10.1086/519683 18 Garc´ ıa-Conde, B., Antoja, T., Roca-F` abrega, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347446

    2007 doi

  9. [18]

    M., Hernquist, L., et al

    Genel, S., Fall, S. M., Hernquist, L., et al. 2015, ApJL, 804, L40, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/804/2/L40

    2015 doi

  10. [19]

    2013, MNRAS, 435, 1426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1383

    Genel, S., Vogelsberger, M., Nelson, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 1426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1383

    2013 doi

  11. [20]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.18042, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18042

    Gong, J.-Y., Lin, W., Tang, L., & Lan, Y. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.18042, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18042

    2025 doi

  12. [21]

    2023, A&A, 680, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347125

    Walker, S., & Mirakhor, M. 2023, A&A, 680, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347125

    2023 doi

  13. [22]

    J., Conroy, C., & Hernquist, L

    Han, J. J., Conroy, C., & Hernquist, L. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1481, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02076-9

    2023 doi

  14. [23]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1294, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02309-5

    Huang, Y., Feng, Q., Khachaturyants, T., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1294, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02309-5

    2024 doi

  15. [24]

    P., & Suto, Y

    Jing, Y. P., & Suto, Y. 2002, ApJ, 574, 538, doi: 10.1086/341065 J´ ozsa, G. I. G., Kenn, F., Klein, U., & Oosterloo, T. A. 2007, A&A, 468, 731, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066164

    2002 doi

  16. [25]

    H., Peirani, S., Kim, S., et al

    Kim, J. H., Peirani, S., Kim, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/90

    2014 doi

  17. [26]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6982

    Lan, Y., Tang, L., Lin, W., & Gong, J. 2024, ApJ, 974, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6982

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    E., Haiman, Z., Pandey, S., & Genel, S

    Lee, M. E., Haiman, Z., Pandey, S., & Genel, S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.12460, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.12460

    2025 doi

  19. [28]

    S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C

    Levine, E. S., Blitz, L., & Heiles, C. 2006, ApJ, 643, 881, doi: 10.1086/503091

    2006 doi

  20. [29]

    S., Erkal, D., et al

    Lilleengen, S., Petersen, M. S., Erkal, D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 774, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3108

    2023 doi

  21. [30]

    Lynden-Bell, D., & Kalnajs, A. J. 1972, MNRAS, 157, 1, doi: 10.1093/mnras/157.1.1

    1972 doi

  22. [31]

    1997, A&A, 318, 747, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9902123

    Masset, F., & Tagger, M. 1997, A&A, 318, 747, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9902123

    1997 doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    R., et al

    McCluskey, F., Wetzel, A., Loebman, S. R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 6926, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3547

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    P., Somerville, R

    Moster, B. P., Somerville, R. S., Maulbetsch, C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 903, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/903

    2010 doi

  25. [34]

    2015, MNRAS, 448, 59, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv017

    Nelson, D., Genel, S., Vogelsberger, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 59, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv017

    2015 doi

  26. [35]

    2019a, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2019a, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    doi

  27. [36]

    2019b, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

    Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pillepich, A., et al. 2019b, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

    doi

  28. [37]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.05235, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05235

    Pandya, S., Yang, Y., Van Alfen, N., Blazek, J., & Walters, R. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.05235, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05235

    2025 doi

  29. [38]

    Peebles, P. J. E. 1969, ApJ, 155, 393, doi: 10.1086/149876

    1969 doi

  30. [39]

    J., & Kuhn, J

    Pereira, M. J., & Kuhn, J. R. 2005, ApJL, 627, L21, doi: 10.1086/432089

    2005 doi

  31. [40]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

    Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Springel, V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2019 doi

  33. [42]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 590, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1017-3

    Poggio, E., Drimmel, R., Andrae, R., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 590, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1017-3

    2020 doi

  34. [43]

    2025, A&A, 702, A164, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555412

    Quezada, C., Zoccali, M., Valenti, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A164, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555412

    2025 doi

  35. [44]

    2002, A&A, 382, 513, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011672

    Reshetnikov, V., Battaner, E., Combes, F., & Jim´ enez-Vicente, J. 2002, A&A, 382, 513, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011672

    2002 doi

  36. [45]

    1998, A&A, 337, 9, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9806114

    Reshetnikov, V., & Combes, F. 1998, A&A, 337, 9, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9806114

    1998 doi arXiv

  37. [46]

    P., Chugunov, I

    Reshetnikov, V. P., Chugunov, I. V., Marchuk, A. A., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554941

    2025 doi

  38. [47]

    V., et al

    Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Pillepich, A., Sales, L. V., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2371, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw456

    2016 doi

  39. [48]

    F., Lotz, J

    Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Snyder, G. F., Lotz, J. M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4140, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3345

    2019 doi

  40. [49]

    M., et al

    Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Genel, S., Fall, S. M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac806

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.03793, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.03793

    Sankar, S., Stern, J., Power, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.03793, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.03793

    2025 doi arXiv

  42. [51]

    Schwarzkopf, U., & Dettmar, R. J. 2001, A&A, 373, 402, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010548

    2001 doi

  43. [52]

    L., D’Onghia, E., et al

    Semczuk, M., Lokas, E. L., D’Onghia, E., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 3535, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2609

    2020 doi

  44. [53]

    Shen, J., & Sellwood, J. A. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10477.x

    2006 doi

  45. [54]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, 123548, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123548

    Sheng, M.-J., Zhu, L., Yu, H.-R., et al. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 123548, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123548

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3e6

    Shi, Y., Yan, L., Armus, L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3e6

    2018 doi

  47. [56]

    S., & Casertano, S

    Sparke, L. S., & Casertano, S. 1988, MNRAS, 234, 873, doi: 10.1093/mnras/234.4.873

    1988 doi

  48. [57]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    2018 doi

  49. [58]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 5587, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz243

    Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 5587, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz243

    2019 doi

  50. [59]

    2023, Galaxies, 11, 59, doi: 10.3390/galaxies11020059

    Vasiliev, E. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 59, doi: 10.3390/galaxies11020059

    2023 doi

  51. [60]

    J., Jing, Y

    Wang, H., Mo, H. J., Jing, Y. P., Yang, X., & Wang, Y. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1973, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18301.x 19

    2011 doi

  52. [61]

    2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944

    2017 doi

  53. [62]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, L46, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu106

    Peirani, S. 2014, MNRAS, 445, L46, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu106

    2014 doi

  54. [63]

    White, S. D. M. 1984, ApJ, 286, 38, doi: 10.1086/162573

    1984 doi

  55. [64]

    G., Jung, S

    Zee, W.-B. G., Jung, S. L., Paudel, S., & Yoon, S.-J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.18942, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.18942

    2025 doi

  56. [65]

    2026, A&A, 706, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557613

    Zhu, L., Cai, R., Kang, X., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557613

    2026 doi

  57. [66]

    M., & Hahn, O

    Zjupa, J., Sch¨ afer, B. M., & Hahn, O. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2010.07951, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.07951

    2020 doi

  58. [67]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 1625, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2945

    Zjupa, J., & Springel, V. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1625, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2945

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.