pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00453 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.CY

Urban to Rural Migration in Eastern Europe: Unpacking digital ruralities through TikTok video analysis

Anca-Simona Horvath , Cristian Tosa , Simai (Stella) Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.CY
keywords urban to rural migrationTikTokdigital ruralityRomaniasocial mediaself-commodificationrural representationcontent analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

TikTok videos from Romania show urban migrants creating paid online content while often romanticizing rural life.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper collects 901 TikTok videos posted under three hashtags that document people relocating from cities to rural Romania, with those videos collectively viewed 24 million times. It applies a digital rurality lens drawn from spatial theory to examine the content as localities, formal representations, and everyday experiences. The study finds that these videos enable new paid labor involving self-commodification that creators rarely disclose to viewers, generate fresh representations that make remote areas unusually data-rich on the platform, and frequently present idealized or romanticized daily life. A sympathetic reader would care because the work shows how digital platforms are actively reshaping migration patterns, rural economies, and public images of the countryside in Eastern Europe.

Core claim

The paper claims that TikTok videos documenting urban-to-rural migration in Romania demonstrate three linked patterns: social media platforms enable new forms of paid labor that sometimes involve commodification of the self although many creators do not acknowledge this with audiences; the digital rural gains new forms of representation and rural areas in remote Romania prove highly data-rich across the platform; and the everyday lives represented are sometimes idealized or romanticised yet they serve as promoters for tourism and as sites to document health advice typically given by non-specialists, criticism of Western medicine, religious and political views, and general self-expression.

What carries the argument

The digital rurality framework, which applies Harvey's and Soja's spatial triad to rural spaces by treating digital technologies as re-mediators of lived experience, used to categorize videos into digital rural localities, formal representations of the digital rural, and everyday lives of the digital rural.

If this is right

  • Social media platforms create opportunities for paid labor in rural areas through content creation that sometimes commodifies personal experience.
  • Rural areas in remote Romania become highly data-rich on TikTok with new representational forms emerging.
  • Idealized or romanticised depictions of rural life promote tourism and serve as venues for sharing health advice, religious and political views, and self-expression.
  • Many creators do not explicitly disclose the commercial aspects of their content to their audiences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same platform dynamics may shape migration narratives in other Eastern European countries experiencing urban-to-rural shifts.
  • Dependence on selective self-presentation could create a rural economy that rewards visibility more than traditional agricultural or local work.
  • Widespread non-specialist health advice in these videos might influence health behaviors or trust in medical systems within rural communities.

Load-bearing premise

The 901 videos gathered under the three hashtags adequately represent the broader urban-to-rural migration process and the digital rurality interpretation captures lived experience without substantial distortion from platform algorithms or selective self-presentation.

What would settle it

Interviews or surveys with actual urban-to-rural migrants in Romania that test whether their reported daily experiences, income sources, and self-perceptions align with the commodified, idealized, and data-rich portrayals identified in the TikTok corpus.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00453 by Anca-Simona Horvath, Cristian Tosa, Simai (Stella) Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The four-step process in our methodology. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The mapping of rural migration topics. through before-and-after sequences that trace the progression of work across time. Animal Companionship (n=8, 7.5%) presents rural life through the lens of cohab￾itation with animals, using humor and sometimes ’cuteness’ to attract views and likes. The largest cluster, Nature & Aesthetics, (n=26, 24.3%) groups videos in which the rural environment is presented through… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Urban to rural migration is a less-researched phenomenon compared to its counterpart: rural to urban migration. In parts of Europe, an increasing number of people living in big urban centers within the country, or moving from other countries decide to relocate to rural areas. In this paper, we examine this phenomenon by analysing content posted on TikTok that documents this transition. We collected a corpus of 901 videos posted until late 2025, documenting urban to rural migration in Romania, under three hashtags, which have collectively been played a total of 24 million times at the time when we gathered the dataset. We analyse this corpus both quantitatively and qualitatively and discuss our findings through the lens of digital rurality - a theory based on Harvey's and Soja's spatial triad, applied to rural spaces, and based on the role of digital technologies as (re-)mediators of everyday lived experience. Specifically, we analyze the corpus as: (a) digital rural localities, (b) formal representations of the digital rural, and (c) everyday lives of the digital rural. We find that (a) Social media platforms enable new forms of paid labor that sometimes involve the commodification of the self in rural areas, although many of the creators we analyze do not explicitly acknowledge this with their audiences. (b) The digital rural gains new forms of representation, and rural areas in remote Romania are highly data-rich across TikTok. (c) The everyday lives represented through the digital rural are sometimes idealized or romanticised. However, they serve as promoters for tourism and are used as sites to document and discuss a variety of topics including giving ample health advice, typically by non-specialists and sometimes criticizing Western medicine, expressing and promoting religious and political views but also acting as forms of general self-expression.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines urban-to-rural migration in Romania through analysis of a corpus of 901 TikTok videos collected under three hashtags (totaling 24 million plays). It applies a mixed quantitative-qualitative approach framed by digital rurality theory, derived from Harvey's and Soja's spatial triad, to interpret the content in three categories: digital rural localities, formal representations of the digital rural, and everyday lives of the digital rural. The findings highlight new forms of platform-enabled paid labor involving self-commodification (often unacknowledged by creators), the emergence of data-rich representations of remote rural areas on TikTok, and sometimes idealized or romanticized portrayals of rural life that also promote tourism, provide health advice (including critiques of Western medicine), express religious/political views, and enable general self-expression.

Significance. If methodological transparency is improved, the work offers a valuable empirical contribution to digital geography, migration studies, and HCI by extending spatial theory to short-form video platforms. The substantial corpus size and focus on an under-researched migration direction (urban-to-rural in Eastern Europe) provide concrete examples of how social media mediates rural experiences, including platform labor dynamics and the datafication of remote spaces. The mixed-methods framing is a positive step toward bridging quantitative patterns with interpretive depth.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Corpus Collection] Abstract / Corpus Collection: The collection of 901 videos under three hashtags is described without specifying hashtag selection criteria, the total population of videos per hashtag at collection time, the sampling fraction or method (e.g., exhaustive, random, or popularity-thresholded), or any steps taken to mitigate algorithmic amplification or creator self-curation biases. This is load-bearing for claims (a) and (c) because the assertions about unacknowledged self-commodification and romanticization rest on the assumption that the sampled videos reflect lived migration experiences rather than platform-optimized or performative content.
  2. [Analysis Methods] Analysis Methods: The quantitative and qualitative procedures lack detail on the coding scheme, how themes (e.g., commodification of the self, idealization, health advice by non-specialists) were operationalized, inter-coder reliability measures, or validation against the digital rurality lens categories (localities, representations, everyday lives). Without these, it is difficult to evaluate whether the three headline findings are robust or shaped by the interpretive framework itself.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The collection date 'until late 2025' should be corrected or clarified, as it appears inconsistent with current timelines.
  2. [Theory / Introduction] A short explicit mapping of Harvey's and Soja's spatial triad onto the three analysis categories (a, b, c) would aid readers in following the theoretical application.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback, which identifies key opportunities to enhance the methodological transparency of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen its empirical contributions to digital geography, migration studies, and HCI.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Corpus Collection] Abstract / Corpus Collection: The collection of 901 videos under three hashtags is described without specifying hashtag selection criteria, the total population of videos per hashtag at collection time, the sampling fraction or method (e.g., exhaustive, random, or popularity-thresholded), or any steps taken to mitigate algorithmic amplification or creator self-curation biases. This is load-bearing for claims (a) and (c) because the assertions about unacknowledged self-commodification and romanticization rest on the assumption that the sampled videos reflect lived migration experiences rather than platform-optimized or performative content.

    Authors: We agree that additional transparency is required here to allow proper evaluation of potential biases. In the revised manuscript, we will name the three specific hashtags, detail the selection criteria (relevance to Romanian urban-to-rural migration narratives and high engagement), report the total video population per hashtag at collection time where platform data permitted, clarify that collection was exhaustive within the date cutoff of late 2025, and add an explicit limitations subsection discussing algorithmic amplification, creator self-curation, and the performative character of TikTok content. This will directly support our interpretations of self-commodification and romanticization by acknowledging the platform-mediated nature of the corpus. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Analysis Methods] Analysis Methods: The quantitative and qualitative procedures lack detail on the coding scheme, how themes (e.g., commodification of the self, idealization, health advice by non-specialists) were operationalized, inter-coder reliability measures, or validation against the digital rurality lens categories (localities, representations, everyday lives). Without these, it is difficult to evaluate whether the three headline findings are robust or shaped by the interpretive framework itself.

    Authors: We concur that expanded methodological detail will improve rigor and replicability. The revised methods section will describe the coding scheme in full, including operational definitions for themes such as self-commodification (instances of monetized rural self-presentation without explicit disclosure), idealization (selective positive framing), and non-specialist health advice (content critiquing Western medicine). We will outline the application of the digital rurality categories (localities, representations, everyday lives) derived from Harvey and Soja, and report any inter-coder reliability procedures applied to a subset of the corpus. This will clarify that the three findings are grounded in the data while interpreted through the theoretical lens. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical corpus analysis framed by external theory

full rationale

The paper collects 901 TikTok videos under three hashtags and conducts quantitative/qualitative content analysis of themes such as commodification of self, representation, and romanticization. It applies the digital rurality lens drawn from Harvey and Soja's spatial triad as an interpretive framework to the external data. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations exist that reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs. The central claims rest on interpretation of independently gathered video content rather than self-definitional loops, self-citation load-bearing premises, or renaming of known results. The analysis is self-contained against the collected corpus and prior literature without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on an established spatial theory applied to social media data; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond the domain assumption of the digital rurality framework.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Digital rurality theory based on Harvey's and Soja's spatial triad, treating digital technologies as (re-)mediators of rural lived experience
    Invoked to structure the corpus analysis into localities, representations, and everyday lives.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1480 out tokens · 63228 ms · 2026-05-09T19:09:24.166013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ceccato, V., Kang, Y., Abraham, J., Näsman, P., Duarte, F., Gao, S., Ljungqvist, L., Zhang, F., Ratti, C.,

    URL:https://doi.org/10.2337/cd24-0089, doi:10.2337/cd24-0089. Ceccato, V., Kang, Y., Abraham, J., Näsman, P., Duarte, F., Gao, S., Ljungqvist, L., Zhang, F., Ratti, C.,

    work page doi:10.2337/cd24-0089

  2. [2]

    The British Jour- nal of Criminology 66, 265–289

    What makes a place safe? assessing ai-generated 25 safety perception scores using stockholm’s street view images. The British Jour- nal of Criminology 66, 265–289. URL:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaf017, doi:10.1093/bjc/azaf017. Chen, H., Wang, M., Zhang, Z.,

    work page doi:10.1093/bjc/azaf017

  3. [3]

    Cistelecan, A., Rogozanu, C., Marincea, A., Grama, A., Trifan, E., Baghiu, S., Mercescu, A., Cercel, C.,

    URL:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10115, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610115. Cistelecan, A., Rogozanu, C., Marincea, A., Grama, A., Trifan, E., Baghiu, S., Mercescu, A., Cercel, C.,

    work page doi:10.3390/ijerph191610115

  4. [4]

    URL:https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2025.2482389, doi:10.1080/25739638.2025.2482389

    Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Eu- rope 33, 167–179. URL:https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2025.2482389, doi:10.1080/25739638.2025.2482389. Císařová, L.W., Jansová, I., Mota, J.,

    work page doi:10.1080/25739638.2025.2482389 2025

  5. [5]

    Media and Communication doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7198

    Delayed reflections: Media and journal- ism data deserts in the post-socialist czech republic. Media and Communication doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7198. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G.,

    work page doi:10.17645/mac.7198

  6. [6]

    Delgado Viñas, C., Gómez Moreno, M.L.,

    URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040, doi:10.1111/glob.12040. Delgado Viñas, C., Gómez Moreno, M.L.,

    work page doi:10.1111/glob.12040

  7. [7]

    Eurostat,

    URL:https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081298, doi:10.3390/land11081298. Eurostat,

    work page doi:10.3390/land11081298

  8. [8]

    Journal of Rural Studies 23, 125–141

    Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies 23, 125–141. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016706000696, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002. Hart, S.K.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002 2006

  9. [10]

    Hawelka, B., Sitko, I., Beinat, E., Sobolevsky, S., Kazakopoulos, P., Ratti, C.,

    doi:10.1177/20563051211012344. Hawelka, B., Sitko, I., Beinat, E., Sobolevsky, S., Kazakopoulos, P., Ratti, C.,

    work page doi:10.1177/20563051211012344

  10. [11]

    Cartography and Geographic Information Science 41, 260–271

    Geo-located twitter as proxy for global mobil- ity patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 41, 260–271. URL:https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2014.890072, doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.890072. He, H., Leszczynski, A.,

    work page doi:10.1080/15230406.2014.890072 2014

  11. [12]

    Journal of Rural Studies 122, 103958

    Digital rurality: A three-fold model and research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 122, 103958. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725003997, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103958. Horvath, A.S., Pouliou, P.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103958 2025

  12. [13]

    Digital Twins in Architecture: An ecology of practices and understandings. 1 ed.. CRC Press, Netherlands. pp. 662–686. doi:10.1201/9781003425724-46. Hutto, C., Gilbert, E.,

    work page doi:10.1201/9781003425724-46

  13. [14]

    Landscape and Urban Planning 236, 104768

    Assessing differences in safety perceptions using geoai and survey across neighbourhoods in stock- holm, sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning 236, 104768. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204623000877, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104768. Komito, L.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104768 2023

  14. [15]

    27 Li, J., Wei, D., Lu, M.,

    URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21517, doi:10.1002/asi.21517. 27 Li, J., Wei, D., Lu, M.,

    work page doi:10.1002/asi.21517

  15. [16]

    Li, M., Guo, S., Duarte, F., Kumar, A., Kobori, N., Xue, F., Zhuang, W., Yeh, A.G.O., Ratti, C.,

    URL:https://pssxiv.cn/abs/202503.02789, doi:DOI:10.12451/202503.02789. Li, M., Guo, S., Duarte, F., Kumar, A., Kobori, N., Xue, F., Zhuang, W., Yeh, A.G.O., Ratti, C.,

    work page doi:10.12451/202503.02789

  16. [17]

    Mavrič, T., Čebron Lipovec, N.,

    doi:10.1038/s42949-025- 00306-9. Mavrič, T., Čebron Lipovec, N.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s42949-025-

  17. [18]

    Morra, D., Zhu, X., Liu, C., Fu, K., Duarte, F., Mora, S., He, Z., Ratti, C.,

    URL:https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7083, doi:10.17645/up.7083. Morra, D., Zhu, X., Liu, C., Fu, K., Duarte, F., Mora, S., He, Z., Ratti, C.,

    work page doi:10.17645/up.7083

  18. [19]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 382, 20240106

    Mapping sidewalk accessibility with smartphone imagery and visual ai: a participatory approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 382, 20240106. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0106, doi:10.1098/rsta.2024.0106. Mulianingrum, R.L., Hidayat, E.Y.,

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2024.0106 2024

  19. [20]

    Muntele, I., Istrate, M., Horea-S,erban, R.I., Banica, A.,

    URL: https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i6.11385, doi:10.30871/jaic.v9i6.11385. Muntele, I., Istrate, M., Horea-S,erban, R.I., Banica, A.,

    work page doi:10.30871/jaic.v9i6.11385

  20. [21]

    Nistor, A., Zadobrischi, E.,

    URL:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10902, doi:10.3390/su131910902. Nistor, A., Zadobrischi, E.,

    work page doi:10.3390/su131910902 2071

  21. [22]

    Orsi, G., Venverloo, T., La Grotteria, A., Fugiglando, U., Duarte, F., Santi, P., Ratti, C.,

    URL:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/11/448, doi:10.3390/admsci15110448. Orsi, G., Venverloo, T., La Grotteria, A., Fugiglando, U., Duarte, F., Santi, P., Ratti, C.,

    work page doi:10.3390/admsci15110448 2076

  22. [23]

    Transporta- tion Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 185, 105554

    Street design and driving behavior: Evi- dence from a large-scale study in milan and amsterdam. Transporta- tion Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 185, 105554. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X26000422, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2026.105554. 28 Petrescu-Mag, R.M., Petrescu, D.C., Azadi, H.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2026.105554 2026

  23. [24]

    Land Use Policy 113, 105851

    From scythe to smartphone: Rural transformation in romania evidenced by the percep- tion of rural land and population. Land Use Policy 113, 105851. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721005743, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105851. Quinn, B., Nichols, L., Frazee, J., Payton, M., Linger, R.M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105851 2021

  24. [25]

    de Souza, P., Anenberg, S., Makarewicz, C., Shirgaokar, M., Duarte, F., Ratti, C., Durant, J.L., Kinney, P.L., Niemeier, D.,

    URL:https://doi.org/10.2196/77383, doi:10.2196/77383. de Souza, P., Anenberg, S., Makarewicz, C., Shirgaokar, M., Duarte, F., Ratti, C., Durant, J.L., Kinney, P.L., Niemeier, D.,

    work page doi:10.2196/77383

  25. [26]

    de Souza, P.N., Shea, A.A., Vitzthum, V.J., Duarte, F., Hanly, C.G., Timmons, M., Huguelet, P., Sammel, M.D., Ratti, C., Braun, D., Nethery, R.C.,

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07926. de Souza, P.N., Shea, A.A., Vitzthum, V.J., Duarte, F., Hanly, C.G., Timmons, M., Huguelet, P., Sammel, M.D., Ratti, C., Braun, D., Nethery, R.C.,

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07926

  26. [27]

    The Lancet Planetary Health doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00080-4

    The effect of air pollution exposure on menstrual cycle health using self-reported data from a mobile health app: a prospective, observational study. The Lancet Planetary Health doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00080-4. de Statistică, I.N.,

    work page doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(25)00080-4

  27. [28]

    URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.013, doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.013. TikHub,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.013 2021

  28. [29]

    Journal of Rural Studies 102, 103075

    An examination of digital empathy: When farmers speak for the climate through tiktok. Journal of Rural Studies 102, 103075. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103075. Vais, D.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103075 2023

  29. [30]

    Urban Planning 7, 207–222

    Systematization: A key term in 20th-century romanian urbanism. Urban Planning 7, 207–222. URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4791, doi:10.17645/up.v7i1.4791. 29 Vázquez-Herrero, J., Negreira-Rey, M.C.,

    work page doi:10.17645/up.v7i1.4791

  30. [31]

    arXiv preprint URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15278v1

    Interpreting multimodal communication at scale in short-form video: Visual, audio, and textual mental health discourse on tiktok. arXiv preprint URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15278v1. Zhang, Y., Yasin, S.M., Sun, L.,

    work page arXiv

  31. [32]

    GeoJour- nal URL:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-025-11336-2, doi:10.1007/s10708- 025-11336-2

    The implications of urban-to-rural migration on rural development: A systematic literature review. GeoJour- nal URL:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-025-11336-2, doi:10.1007/s10708- 025-11336-2. Öcek, R.E., İslam, T.,

    work page doi:10.1007/s10708-025-11336-2

  32. [33]

    URL: https://10.14744/planlama.2024.00086, doi:10.14744/planlama.2024.00086. 30

    work page doi:10.14744/planlama.2024.00086 2024