pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00693 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Dynamical tidal Love numbers of black holes under generic perturbations: Connecting black hole perturbation theory with effective field theory

Sumanta Chakraborty , M.V.S Saketh , Tanja Hinderer , Jan Steinhoff
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords tidal Love numbersKerr black holeseffective field theoryblack hole perturbation theorydynamical tidesgravitational wavesspin-tidal couplingsfinite-size effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

The dynamical tidal response of spinning black holes includes a Love number appearing at linear order in frequency, derived by matching an effective field theory description to solutions of the perturbation equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs an effective field theory for Kerr black holes under generic perturbations that incorporates couplings between the black hole spin and gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic tidal fields. It then matches the EFT worldline description to wave-like solutions of the full black hole perturbation equations to extract the tidal response coefficients to linear order in frequency. The analysis covers scalar and gravitational cases and produces both dissipative and conservative contributions to the response while addressing spin-induced mixing of multipolar modes. A sympathetic reader would care because this provides a systematic method to include finite-size tidal effects when modeling the dynamics and gravitational waves from binary systems containing black holes.

Core claim

By establishing an EFT description of the perturbed black hole that accounts for the couplings between the spin, gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic tidal fields, and matching this to wave-like solutions to the full black hole perturbation equations, the dynamical Love number is obtained at linear order in frequency for spinning black holes, together with an approximate expression for the dynamical tidal response that includes both dissipative and conservative pieces, with spin-induced multipolar mode mixing treated as essential for consistency.

What carries the argument

An effective field theory worldline endowed with internal degrees of freedom for finite-size effects, matched to black hole perturbation theory solutions, where the dynamical Love number is the coefficient of the linear-in-frequency tidal response term after including spin-tidal couplings.

If this is right

  • The tidal response coefficients for spinning black holes can be computed systematically at linear frequency order including both dissipative and conservative pieces.
  • Spin-induced mixing of multipolar modes must be included to obtain a consistent matching between the EFT and perturbation theory.
  • The framework applies to both scalar and gravitational perturbations of Kerr black holes.
  • The resulting approximate dynamical tidal response expression can be used to model finite-size effects in binary black hole dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This matching procedure would enable incorporation of frequency-dependent tidal effects for spinning black holes into gravitational waveform models for inspiraling binaries.
  • The same EFT approach could be extended to higher orders in frequency by adding further operators that capture additional spin-tidal interactions.
  • The results imply that black hole tidal deformability becomes frequency-dependent at leading order once spin is taken into account, distinguishing it from the nonspinning static case.

Load-bearing premise

The effective field theory correctly encodes the couplings between spin and gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic tidal fields, and the matching to perturbation solutions remains valid once spin-induced mixing of multipolar modes is accounted for.

What would settle it

A direct extraction of the linear-in-frequency coefficient in the tidal response function from solutions to the Teukolsky equation for a spinning black hole, showing a value that differs from the matched EFT prediction after mode mixing, would falsify the central result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00693 by Jan Steinhoff, M.V.S Saketh, Sumanta Chakraborty, Tanja Hinderer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Relevant zones in the problem of matching of BH perturbation theory with EFT. As illustrated, BH perturbation view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The figure depicts view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The foundation for modeling the coupling of the internal structure of compact objects in binary systems to their dynamics and emitted gravitational waves is a systematic effective field theory (EFT) framework, where each compact object is replaced by a worldline endowed with a set of internal degrees of freedom. These degrees of freedom encode finite-size effects and thereby distinguish between different classes of compact objects. Among finite-size effects, tidal interactions play a central role, as they are associated to various kinds of deformations of a body under the influence of external tidal fields. In this work, we analyze the dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes to generic-spin perturbations, focusing primarily on the scalar and gravitational cases, and working to linear order in frequency. We establish an EFT description of the perturbed black hole that accounts for the couplings between the spin, gravitoelectric and -magnetic tidal fields. We match this to wave-like solutions to the full black hole perturbation equations in order to determine the tidal response coefficients. In particular, we obtain the dynamical Love number, which appears at linear order in frequency for spinning black holes, and derive an approximate expression for the dynamical tidal response, including both dissipative and conservative pieces. We also examine several technical subtleties that arise in the matching procedure, with special emphasis on the mixing of multipolar modes induced by the spin of the compact object, which proves to be essential for a consistent treatment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an EFT description of Kerr black holes under generic perturbations (scalar and gravitational), incorporating couplings between spin, gravitoelectric, and gravitomagnetic tidal fields. It matches this EFT to solutions of the black-hole perturbation equations at linear order in frequency, after including leading spin-induced multipolar mixing, to extract the dynamical Love number (appearing at O(ω) for spinning BHs) and an approximate expression for the full dynamical tidal response that separates dissipative and conservative pieces.

Significance. If the matching is complete and unambiguous, the work supplies a controlled bridge between black-hole perturbation theory and worldline EFTs for finite-size effects. This is valuable for gravitational-wave modeling of binaries containing spinning black holes, where dynamical tidal contributions enter at low post-Newtonian orders. The explicit treatment of spin-tidal mixing and the extraction of both conservative and dissipative coefficients at linear frequency constitute a concrete advance over static Love-number calculations.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4 and Appendix B] §4 and Appendix B: the matching procedure includes the leading spin-tidal mixing operators and projects onto a finite multipole basis, but discards O(ω²) and higher-spin corrections. It is not demonstrated that these discarded channels cannot contribute at the same O(ω) order as the dynamical Love number; any such leakage would shift the extracted conservative coefficient by an amount comparable to the reported value and undermine the separation into conservative versus dissipative pieces.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and §1 use the phrase “generic-spin perturbations” without an explicit definition; a short parenthetical clarifying that this includes arbitrary spin orientations relative to the tidal field would improve readability.
  2. [§3] Several equations in §3 introduce auxiliary coefficients (e.g., the spin-tidal coupling constants) whose normalization conventions are stated only in the text; adding a compact table or explicit normalization statement would reduce the risk of misinterpretation when the expressions are reused.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important point about the matching procedure. We address the concern directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 and Appendix B] §4 and Appendix B: the matching procedure includes the leading spin-tidal mixing operators and projects onto a finite multipole basis, but discards O(ω²) and higher-spin corrections. It is not demonstrated that these discarded channels cannot contribute at the same O(ω) order as the dynamical Love number; any such leakage would shift the extracted conservative coefficient by an amount comparable to the reported value and undermine the separation into conservative versus dissipative pieces.

    Authors: We agree that the current text does not contain an explicit demonstration that O(ω²) and higher-spin corrections cannot feed into the O(ω) dynamical Love number. The black-hole perturbation solutions are obtained from the Teukolsky equation expanded to linear order in frequency, while the EFT side retains only the leading spin-tidal mixing operators and projects onto a finite multipole basis. In the frequency expansion, O(ω²) contributions appear only at quadratic order and do not mix into the linear term. Higher-spin operators (additional powers of the spin parameter beyond the leading mixing) enter with extra spin insertions that are orthogonal to the channels used for the O(ω) matching at the order considered. Nevertheless, because this separation is not spelled out, we will revise §4 and Appendix B to add a short power-counting subsection that explicitly shows why leakage is absent at O(ω). This addition will also reinforce the conservative-versus-dissipative decomposition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: dynamical Love numbers extracted by matching EFT to independent BH perturbation solutions

full rationale

The paper constructs an EFT worldline description that includes spin–gravitoelectric/gravitomagnetic couplings and then matches the resulting tidal response coefficients to solutions of the Teukolsky (or scalar) wave equations. The matching determines the linear-in-frequency dynamical Love number and the conservative/dissipative pieces from the asymptotic behavior of the independent perturbation solutions; it does not define those coefficients inside the EFT or rename a fit as a prediction. Spin-induced multipolar mixing is incorporated into the matching procedure (as described in the abstract and referenced sections), but the underlying wave solutions remain an external, non-circular input. No self-citation chain, self-definitional loop, or ansatz-smuggling is required for the central result. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the benchmark of black-hole perturbation theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of black-hole perturbation theory and the EFT worldline framework for compact objects; no new free parameters, axioms beyond domain conventions, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The tidal response can be expanded to linear order in frequency.
    Explicitly stated as the working regime of the calculation.
  • domain assumption The EFT worldline degrees of freedom correctly capture finite-size tidal effects for black holes.
    Foundation of the EFT approach described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1228 out tokens · 48665 ms · 2026-05-09T18:48:54.810341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    From the above expression, note that ˆℓs=0 = ˆℓ, the quan- tity that we have used to describe the near-zone physics in the scalar case

    +O(a 2ω2) = ˆℓs(ˆℓs + 1) + 2amω+ 4iωsr+ +O(a 2ω2). From the above expression, note that ˆℓs=0 = ˆℓ, the quan- tity that we have used to describe the near-zone physics in the scalar case. Therefore, it follows that, ˆℓs(ˆℓs + 1) =E ℓm −2amω−4iωsr + =ℓ(ℓ+ 1) +M ω −4isr+ M − 2am M − 2ams2 M ℓ(ℓ+ 1) , (139) implying, ˆℓs =ℓ+O(M ω). With this parametrization, ...

  2. [2]

    Considering thez→0 limit of Eq

    Boundary condition at the horizon As we are studying perturbations of a BH spacetime, whose distinguishing feature is the presence of an event 20 horizon, the appropriate boundary conditions are that there are only purely ingoing modes at the BH horizon. Considering thez→0 limit of Eq. (140), we obtain, sR(near) ℓm =C 1ziP+ +C 2z−iP+−s ≃C 1ei¯ωr∗ + C2 ∆s ...

  3. [3]

    In the z→ ∞limit, i.e., in the intermediate zone, the above solution, presented in Eq

    Solution in the intermediate zone Having derived the near-zone solution, with appropri- ate boundary condition at the horizon, let us consider its asymptotic limit, in order to determine the solution to the radial equation in the intermediate zone. In the z→ ∞limit, i.e., in the intermediate zone, the above solution, presented in Eq. (142), yields, sR(nea...

  4. [4]

    For this purpose, we can use the results presented in Eq

    Solution in the intermediate zone Having derived the general solution to the radial equa- tion in the far-zone, let us consider theωr≪1 limit and determine the solution in the intermediate zone. For this purpose, we can use the results presented in Eq. (D2) of Appendix D, such that Eq. (151) reduces to, sR(far) ℓm(int) = B∞ ℓm,reg Γ(¯ν+ 1) ω 2 ¯ν r ˜ℓ−s −...

  5. [5]

    For this purpose, we will first re-express the far-zone solution in terms of Bessel functions and then we will take the asymptotic limit

    Solution in the asymptotic region In order to find the matching of the perturbation the- ory approach with the EFT techniques we need to con- sider the asymptotic limit of the far-zone solution. For this purpose, we will first re-express the far-zone solution in terms of Bessel functions and then we will take the asymptotic limit. Therefore, to obtain the...

  6. [6]

    A Γ(−2ˆℓe) Γ(s− ˆℓe) e±iπ(ˆℓe+s)(−2ieP+) ˆℓe+s +B Γ(2 + 2ˆℓe) Γ(1 + ˆℓe +s) e∓iπ(1+ˆℓe−s)(−2ieP+)−1−ˆℓe+s # +e − 2i eP+ y

    The limit to the horizon We first consider the near-horizon limit, which corre- sponds toy→0. In this case, using Eq. (D3) in Ap- pendix D, the radial function in the limit towards the horizon becomes, sR(EF) ℓm |hor =y −2s " A Γ(−2ˆℓe) Γ(s− ˆℓe) e±iπ(ˆℓe+s)(−2ieP+) ˆℓe+s +B Γ(2 + 2ˆℓe) Γ(1 + ˆℓe +s) e∓iπ(1+ˆℓe−s)(−2ieP+)−1−ˆℓe+s # +e − 2i eP+ y " A Γ(−2ˆ...

  7. [7]

    Extension to the intermediate zone In order to arrive at the intermediate zone, we take the limity→ ∞of Eq. (191), which implies that the argument of the confluent hypergeometric functions must vanish, and since lim z→0 M(a, b;z) = 1, we obtain, sR(EF) (int) ℓm =A r r+ ˆℓe−s" 1 + Γ(−2ˆℓe)Γ(1 + ˆℓe −s) Γ(−ˆℓe −s)Γ(2 + 2 ˆℓe) × r+ r 1+2ˆℓe 2ieP+ 1+2ˆℓe # .(...

  8. [8]

    (199) and Eq

    Scalar Perturbation For scalar perturbations, using the EFT results from Section II, the BH perturbation theory tidal response function turns out to be, λext ℓm = 1 M ω 2ℓ+1 Γ(1 + ˆℓe) Γ(2 + 2ˆℓe) Γ(1 + ˆℓe) Γ(1 + 2ˆℓe) (−4iM¯ω)2ˆℓe+1 π(−1)ℓ+1 2Γ(ℓ+ 1/2)Γ(ℓ+ 3/2) M ω 2 2ℓ+1 = (−1)ℓ+1π 22ℓ+2 × Γ(1 + ˆℓe) Γ(2 + 2ˆℓe) Γ(1 + ˆℓe) Γ(1 + 2ˆℓe) ! × (2im−4iM ω) 1...

  9. [9]

    1 + 2(l−1) ˆ∂r ˆr ! + 1 2 ℓ(ℓ−1) ˆ∂r ˆr !# + 2CKℓ−1(iˆxj) ˆxKℓ−1 ˆ∂r ˆr !ℓ

    Gravitational Perturbation The response function associated with the gravitational perturbation of an extremal Kerr BH, using the EFT matching used in Section IVD, takes the following form, −2λext ℓm =−(M ω) −2ℓ−1 (ℓ+ 1) (ℓ−1) 3 + 8ℓ+ 4ℓ2 3−8ℓ+ 4ℓ 2 C ∞ irreg C ∞reg =−(M ω) −2ℓ−1 (ℓ+ 1) (ℓ−1) 3 + 8ℓ+ 4ℓ2 3−8ℓ+ 4ℓ 2 Γ(3 + ˆℓe)Γ(ˆℓe −1) Γ(2 + 2ˆℓe)Γ(1 + 2ˆℓ...

    2023

  10. [10]

    The confluent hypergeometric functionU(a, b;z) can be expressed in terms of the other functionM(a, b;z), as follows [DLMF (13.2.42)], U(a, b;z) = Γ(1−b) Γ(a−b+ 1) M(a, b;z) + Γ(b−1) Γ(a) z1−bM(a−b+ 1,2−b;z).(D1)

  11. [11]

    The limit of the confluent hypergeometric functions in the zero limit takes the following form, lim z→0 M(a, b;z)∼1 ; lim z→0 U(a, b;z)∼ π sin(πb) 1 Γ(b)Γ(1 +a−b) − z1−b Γ(a)Γ(2−b) .(D2)

  12. [12]

    The asymptotic limit of the confluent hypergeometric functionM(a, b;z) becomes, lim z→∞ M(a, b;z) = Γ(b) Γ(b−a) e∓iπaz−a + Γ(b) Γ(a) ezza−b .(D3)

  13. [13]

    For a confluent hypergeometric functionM(a, b;z), if the coefficientsaandbsatisfies the relationb= 2a, then we have M ν+ 1 2 ,2ν+ 1; 2z = Γ(1 +ν)e z z 2 −ν Iν(z),(D4) U ν+ 1 2 ,2ν+ 1; 2z = 1√π ez (2z)−ν Kν(z).(D5)

  14. [14]

    For a confluent hypergeometric functionM(a, b;z), if the coefficientsaandbsatisfies the relationb−2ais an integer, then we have two useful identities: M ν+ 1 2 ,2ν+ 1 +n; 2z = Γ(ν+ 1)e z z 2 −ν × nX k=0 (−n)k k! Γ(2ν+k) Γ(2ν) Γ(2ν+ 1 +n) Γ(2ν+ 1 +n+k) ν+k ν Iν+k(z),(D6) M ν+ 1 2 ,2ν+ 1−n; 2z = Γ(ν−n+ 1)e z z 2 n−ν × nX k=0 (−1)k (−n)k k! Γ(2ν−2n+k) Γ(2ν−2...

  15. [15]

    These identities relate the modified Bessel functions to Bessel functions of first and second kind. Iν(z) =e ∓iπν/2 Jν(±iz) ;K ν(z) = π 2 I−ν(z)−I ν(z) sin(πν) ;J −(m+ 1 2 )(x) = (−1)m+1Ym+ 1 2 (x),(D8) 37 Appendix E: Dynamical response function: Generic Spin In this appendix, we will present all the results for the simplification of the dynamical respons...

  16. [16]

    Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, “Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detec- tors,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 021502,arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

    T. Hinderer, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,” Astrophys. J.677(2008) 1216–1220,arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 697, 964 (2009)]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Relativistic tidal proper- ties of neutron stars,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 084035, arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, “Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 084018, arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]. [5]LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 16, (2018) 161101,arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization,

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin, “Black hole stereotyping: In- duced gravito-static polarization,”JHEP02(2012) 010, arXiv:1110.3764 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    Vanishing of Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers from Scattering Amplitudes,

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou, “Vanishing of Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers from Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 9, (2023) 091403,arXiv:2209.14324 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [24]

    Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post-Newtonian orders,

    E. Poisson, “Tidally induced multipole moments of a nonrotating black hole vanish to all post-Newtonian orders,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 10, (2021) 104062, arXiv:2108.07328 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [25]

    Geometric Symmetries for the Vanishing of the Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers,

    R. Berens, L. Hui, D. McLoughlin, R. Penco, and J. Staunton, “Geometric Symmetries for the Vanishing of the Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers,”arXiv:2510.18952 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  24. [26]

    Ladder Symmetry: The Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Vanishing Love Numbers,

    C. Sharma, S. Roy, and S. Sarkar, “Ladder Symmetry: The Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Vanishing Love Numbers,”arXiv:2511.09670 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  25. [27]

    Naturalness of vanishing black-hole tides,

    J. Parra-Martinez and A. Podo, “Naturalness of vanish- ing black-hole tides,”arXiv:2510.20694 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  26. [28]

    Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems,

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. 39 Solomon, “Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implica- tions for love numbers and no-hair theorems,”JCAP01 no. 01, (2022) 032,arXiv:2105.01069 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [29]

    Exploring lad- der symmetry and Love numbers for static and rotating black holes,

    C. Sharma, R. Ghosh, and S. Sarkar, “Exploring lad- der symmetry and Love numbers for static and rotating black holes,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 4, (2024) L041505, arXiv:2401.00703 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [30]

    Running Love numbers and the Effective Field Theory of gravity,

    S. Barbosa, P. Brax, S. Fichet, and L. de Souza, “Running Love numbers and the Effective Field The- ory of gravity,”JCAP07(2025) 071,arXiv:2501.18684 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [31]

    Hidden symmetry of the static re- sponse of black holes: applications to Love numbers,

    J. Ben Achour, E. R. Livine, S. Mukohyama, and J.-P. Uzan, “Hidden symmetry of the static response of black holes: applications to Love numbers,”JHEP07(2022) 112,arXiv:2202.12828 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [32]

    Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes,

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes,” JHEP09(2022) 049,arXiv:2203.08832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [33]

    Love symmetry,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, “Love symmetry,”JHEP10(2022) 175,arXiv:2209.02091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [34]

    Vanishing Love numbers of black holes in general rel- ativity: From spacetime conformal symmetry of a two- dimensional reduced geometry,

    T. Katagiri, M. Kimura, H. Nakano, and K. Omukai, “Vanishing Love numbers of black holes in general rel- ativity: From spacetime conformal symmetry of a two- dimensional reduced geometry,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 12, (2023) 124030,arXiv:2209.10469 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [35]

    Universal Ladder Structure Across Scales: From Quantum to Black Hole Physics

    R. Ghosh, R. P. Bhatt, S. Chakraborty, and S. Bose, “Universal Ladder Structure Across Scales: From Quantum to Black Hole Physics,”arXiv:2604.06249 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [36]

    Tidal Response of Compact Objects

    S. Chakraborty and P. Pani, “Tidal Response of Compact Objects,”arXiv:2604.08679 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [37]

    Love numbers of black holes and compact objects

    M. J. Rodr´ ıguez, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Love numbers of black holes and compact objects,” arXiv:2604.08653 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [38]

    Tidal interactions of inspiral- ing compact binaries,

    L. Bildsten and C. Cutler, “Tidal interactions of inspiral- ing compact binaries,”Astrophys. J.400(1992) 175–180

    1992

  37. [39]

    Hinderer et al., Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one- body approach, Phys

    T. Hindereret al., “Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116no. 18, (2016) 181101, arXiv:1602.00599 [gr-qc]. [26]ETCollaboration, A. Abacet al., “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,”arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  38. [40]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evanset al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]. [28]LISACollaboration, K. G. Arunet al., “New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA,”Living Rev. Rel.25 no. 1, (2022) 4,arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]. [29]https://einsteintelescope.eu

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  39. [41]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitzeet al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Con- tribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51no. 7, (2019) 035, arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]. [31]https://www.lisamission.org. [32]LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRACollaboration, A. G. Abacet al., “GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M ⊙,”Astro- phys....

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  40. [42]

    An Effective Field Theory of Gravity for Extended Objects

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,”Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104029,arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  41. [43]

    Goldberger and I

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “Dissipative ef- fects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104030,arXiv:hep-th/0511133

    work page arXiv 2006

  42. [44]

    Relativistic effective action of dynamical gravitomagnetic tides for slowly rotating neutron stars,

    P. K. Gupta, J. Steinhoff, and T. Hinderer, “Relativistic effective action of dynamical gravitomagnetic tides for slowly rotating neutron stars,”Phys. Rev. Res.3no. 1, (2021) 013147,arXiv:2011.03508 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [45]

    Gravitational Wave Scattering via the Born Series: Scalar Tidal Matching to O(G7) and Beyond,

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, G. Isabella, and M. Solon, “Gravitational Wave Scattering via the Born Series: Scalar Tidal Matching to O(G7) and Beyond,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 19, (2025) 191601,arXiv:2503.13593 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [46]

    Relativistic dy- namical tides: Subtleties and calibration,

    T. Katagiri, K. Yagi, and V. Cardoso, “Relativistic dy- namical tides: Subtleties and calibration,”Phys. Rev. D 111no. 8, (2025) 084080,arXiv:2409.18034 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [47]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars in Horndeski theories,

    R. F. Diedrichs, S. Tsujikawa, and K. Yagi, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars in Horndeski theories,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 044023,arXiv:2501.07998 [gr-qc]. [39]LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRACollabora- tion, A. G. Abacet al., “GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo...

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [48]

    Tidal response of regular black holes,

    C. Coviello, V. Vellucci, and L. Lehner, “Tidal response of regular black holes,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 104073,arXiv:2503.04287 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [49]

    From micro to macro and back: probing near-horizon quantum structures with gravitational waves,

    A. Maselli, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, T. Abdelsalhin, L. Gualtieri, and V. Ferrari, “From micro to macro and back: probing near-horizon quantum structures with gravitational waves,”Class. Quant. Grav.36no. 16, (2019) 167001,arXiv:1811.03689 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  48. [50]

    Dynamical Love numbers for area quantized black holes,

    S. Nair, S. Chakraborty, and S. Sarkar, “Dynamical love numbers for area quantized black holes,”Physical Review D107no. 12, (2023) 124041,2208.06235

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [51]

    Dynamical tidal love numbers of kerr-like compact ob- jects,

    S. Chakraborty, E. Maggio, M. Silvestrini, and P. Pani, “Dynamical tidal love numbers of kerr-like compact ob- jects,”Physical Review D110no. 8, (2024) 084042

    2024

  50. [52]

    Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation,

    P. A. Cano, “Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation,”JHEP07(2025) 152, arXiv:2502.20185 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [53]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Senatore, “Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 25, (2018) 251105,arXiv:1808.08962 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 109903 (2023)]

    work page arXiv 2018

  52. [54]

    Tidal deformation of black holes in Lovelock gravity,

    C. Singha and S. Chakraborty, “Tidal deformation of black holes in Lovelock gravity,”arXiv:2508.14944 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  53. [55]

    Gravitational waves and higher dimensions: Love numbers and Kaluza-Klein excitations,

    V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, and C. J. Moore, “Gravita- tional waves and higher dimensions: Love numbers and Kaluza-Klein excitations,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 12, (2019) 124037,arXiv:1910.09557 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [56]

    Tidal Love numbers of black holes and neutron stars in the presence of higher dimensions: Implications of GW170817,

    K. Chakravarti, S. Chakraborty, S. Bose, and S. Sen- Gupta, “Tidal Love numbers of black holes and neutron stars in the presence of higher dimensions: Implications of GW170817,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 2, (2019) 024036, arXiv:1811.11364 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  55. [57]

    Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,

    M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, “Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 8, (2023) 084011,arXiv:2304.03743 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [58]

    One Membrane to Love them all: Tidal deforma- tions of compact objects from the membrane paradigm,

    M. Silvestrini, E. Maggio, S. Chakraborty, and P. Pani, “One Membrane to Love them all: Tidal deforma- tions of compact objects from the membrane paradigm,” 40 arXiv:2506.16516 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  57. [59]

    No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments

    N. G¨ urlebeck, “No-hair theorem for Black Holes in As- trophysical Environments,”Phys. Rev. Lett.114no. 15, (2015) 151102,arXiv:1503.03240 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  58. [60]

    Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, “Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 8, (2017) 084014, arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 089901 (2017)]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  59. [61]

    Testing the na- ture of dark compact objects with gravitational waves,

    E. Maggio, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, “Testing the na- ture of dark compact objects with gravitational waves,” arXiv:2105.06410 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  60. [62]

    Distinguishing Boson Stars from Black Holes and Neutron Stars from Tidal Interactions in Inspiraling Binary Systems

    N. Sennett, T. Hinderer, J. Steinhoff, A. Buonanno, and S. Ossokine, “Distinguishing Boson Stars from Black Holes and Neutron Stars from Tidal Interactions in In- spiraling Binary Systems,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 2, (2017) 024002,arXiv:1704.08651 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  61. [63]

    Tidal deformability of boson stars and dark matter clumps,

    R. F. P. Mendes and H. Yang, “Tidal deformability of boson stars and dark matter clumps,”Class. Quant. Grav.34no. 18, (2017) 185001,arXiv:1606.03035 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  62. [64]

    Can we identify primordial black holes? Tidal tests for subsolar-mass gravitational-wave observations,

    F. Crescimbeni, G. Franciolini, P. Pani, and A. Riotto, “Can we identify primordial black holes? Tidal tests for subsolar-mass gravitational-wave observations,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 12, (2024) 124063,arXiv:2402.18656 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [65]

    Neutron star tidal deformability and equation of state constraints,

    K. Chatziioannou, “Neutron star tidal deformability and equation of state constraints,”Gen. Rel. Grav.52no. 11, (2020) 109,arXiv:2006.03168 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [66]

    Chakraborty, G

    S. Chakraborty, G. Comp` ere, and L. Machet, “Tidal Love numbers and quasinormal modes of the Schwarzschild- Hernquist black hole,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 2, (2025) 024015,arXiv:2412.14831 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [67]

    Tidal deformability of dressed black holes and tests of ultralight bosons in extended mass ranges,

    V. De Luca and P. Pani, “Tidal deformability of dressed black holes and tests of ultralight bosons in extended mass ranges,”JCAP08(2021) 032,arXiv:2106.14428 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [68]

    Tidal de- formability of black holes surrounded by thin accre- tion disks,

    E. Cannizzaro, V. De Luca, and P. Pani, “Tidal de- formability of black holes surrounded by thin accre- tion disks,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 12, (2024) 123004, arXiv:2408.14208 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [69]

    Modeling horizon absorption in spinning binary black holes using effective worldline theory,

    M. V. S. Saketh, J. Steinhoff, J. Vines, and A. Buonanno, “Modeling horizon absorption in spinning binary black holes using effective worldline theory,”Phys. Rev. D107 no. 8, (2023) 084006,arXiv:2212.13095 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [70]

    Tidal re- sponse from scattering and the role of analytic con- tinuation,

    G. Creci, T. Hinderer, and J. Steinhoff, “Tidal re- sponse from scattering and the role of analytic con- tinuation,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 12, (2021) 124061, arXiv:2108.03385 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 109902 (2022)]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [71]

    New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spec- troscopy and dynamic tides,

    S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate, and J. Steinhoff, “New per- spectives on neutron star and black hole spectroscopy and dynamic tides,”arXiv(2013) ,1304.2228

    work page arXiv 2013

  70. [72]

    Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,

    H. S. Chia, “Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotat- ing black holes,”arXiv(2020) ,2010.07300

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [73]

    Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes,

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M. J. Rodriguez, and L. Santoni, “Dynamical Tidal Re- sponse of Schwarzschild Black Holes,”arXiv:2511.02372 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  72. [74]

    Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT

    H. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, N. Oshita, K. Takahashi, and V. Yingcharoenrat, “Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formal- ism and Worldline EFT,”arXiv:2511.12580 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [75]

    Dynamical Love numbers of black holes: Theory and gravitational waveforms,

    S. Chakraborty, V. De Luca, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani, “Dynamical Love numbers of black holes: Theory and gravitational waveforms,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 10, (2025) 104015,arXiv:2507.22994 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [76]

    Response of a Kerr black hole to a generic tidal perturbation,

    R. P. Bhatt, S. Chakraborty, and S. Bose, “Response of a Kerr black hole to a generic tidal perturbation,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 8, (2025) 084065,arXiv:2412.15117 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [78]

    Dynamical Love Num- bers for Kerr Black Holes,

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez, “Dynamical Love Num- bers for Kerr Black Holes,”arXiv:2310.03660 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  76. [79]

    Love Numbers for Ex- tremal Kerr Black Hole,

    M. Perry and M. J. Rodriguez, “Love Numbers for Ex- tremal Kerr Black Hole,”arXiv:2412.19699 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  77. [80]

    Thetidalresponseofarelativistic star,

    N. Andersson, R. Counsell, F. Gittins, and S. Ghosh, “The tidal response of a relativistic star,” arXiv:2511.05139 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  78. [81]

    Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating rel- ativistic stars,

    A. Hegade K. R., J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, “Dynami- cal tidal response of nonrotating relativistic stars,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 104064,arXiv:2403.03254 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [82]

    High precision analytical description of the allowed beta spectrum shape

    K. S. Thorne, “Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.52(Apr, 1980) 299– 339.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys. 52.299

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 1980

  80. [83]

    Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Tarac- chini, “Dynamical tides in general relativity: Effective action and effective-one-body hamiltonian,”arXiv(2016) ,1608.01907

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.