pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08653 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Love numbers of black holes and compact objects

Mar\'ia J. Rodr\'iguez , Luca Santoni , Adam R. Solomon
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th
keywords Love numberstidal deformabilityblack holesneutron starsgravitational wavesgeneral relativityeffective field theorypost-Newtonian
0
0 comments X

The pith

Love numbers quantify the tidal deformability of black holes and neutron stars, appearing in gravitational wave signals from binary inspirals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review introduces tidal effects from Newtonian gravity and defines Love numbers in general relativity as response coefficients using effective field theory and post-Newtonian frameworks. It surveys their computation for Kerr black holes, neutron stars, and extensions to charged objects, higher dimensions, anti-de Sitter spacetimes, supergravity, and theories beyond general relativity, including static, dynamical, and nonlinear regimes. The authors also review hidden symmetries of general relativity that explain the vanishing of static black hole Love numbers. A reader would care because these coefficients enter the inspiral waveform phase and will be measurable by future gravitational wave detectors, providing tests of strong-field gravity and compact object structure.

Core claim

Love numbers are the coefficients that encode the tidal response of a gravitating body by relating induced multipole moments to an external tidal field; in four-dimensional general relativity the static Love numbers of black holes vanish due to hidden symmetries, while neutron stars and other objects have non-zero values, and the review compiles explicit results and extensions across multiple settings.

What carries the argument

Love numbers, the response coefficients in the asymptotic expansion of metric perturbations that relate induced multipole moments to the external tidal field.

If this is right

  • Tidal Love numbers contribute to the gravitational waveform phase in compact binary inspirals and become measurable with advanced detectors.
  • The vanishing of static black hole Love numbers distinguishes black holes from neutron stars and other compact objects in observations.
  • Dynamical and dissipative response coefficients provide additional information beyond static Love numbers for time-varying tides.
  • In higher-dimensional, charged, or modified-gravity settings the Love numbers take different values, offering potential tests of fundamental physics.
  • Hidden symmetries uncovered in the search for vanishing Love numbers reveal deeper structure in the black hole perturbation equations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetries that force vanishing Love numbers may connect to broader integrability properties or no-hair-like results in general relativity.
  • Explicit values for neutron star Love numbers could be combined with equation-of-state constraints from nuclear physics to refine astrophysical models.
  • Nonlinear tidal responses reviewed here may become observable in highly eccentric or hierarchical systems not yet probed by current detectors.

Load-bearing premise

Perturbation theory, effective field theory, and post-Newtonian methods give complete and consistent definitions of tidal responses without missing higher-order or quantum effects.

What would settle it

An observation of non-zero static Love numbers in the waveform of a binary merger involving confirmed black holes, after accounting for all post-Newtonian and higher-order corrections, would contradict the vanishing result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08653 by Adam R. Solomon, Luca Santoni, Mar\'ia J. Rodr\'iguez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Two compact objects m1 and m2 in a binary orbit, treated as point particles to leading order. Dashed rings indicate the emitted gravitational-wave signal. Right: Zooming in on m2 reveals that its finite size leads to a quadrupolar (ℓ = 2) tidal bulge induced by the external tidal field Eij sourced by the companion m1. The induced quadrupole Iij defines the tidal deformability parameter λ2, which corr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A schematic illustration the physical setup described in the main text: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The effective potential (3.21) for null geodesics and the spin-0 effective potential (3.39) for ℓ = 1, 2, normalized to unity at their maxima. The geodesic potential peaks at the photon sphere (3.22), r = 3rs/2, while the scalar potentials peak at r = 3rs/2 − ϵ with ϵ going quickly to zero with increasing ℓ, as we see from only the first two modes. 3.2. Kerr 3.2.1. Geometry Black holes in the real world ro… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cross-sectional view of the characteristic surfaces of the Kerr spacetime in Boyer–Lindquist coordinates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Static dissipative response coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Figure adapted from Ref. [186]. Examples of tabulated, nuclear-physics-based EoS — specifically APR [520], MS1 [521], and SLy4 [522] — are shown (see Ref. [186] and references therein for details). The left panel displays the relation between the mass parameter M ≡ M(R∗) and the stellar radius R∗ for the neutron-star EoS considered. The right panel shows the corresponding (linear) tidal Love number as a fu… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Figure adapted from Ref. [186]. The dimensionless coefficient p2, capturing the leading quadratic tidal deformation as a function of compactness for different EoS, is shown. strengthen the case that the tidal response of neutron stars can be characterized by a small number of bulk parameters, largely independent of poorly known microphysics, and provide robust observational handles on fundamental physics. … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Love numbers of a gravitating body are response coefficients encoding its tidal deformability. In compact binary systems, they appear in the gravitational waveform during the inspiral phase and will be measurable by upcoming gravitational-wave observatories. This review provides a comprehensive and pedagogical account of the theoretical foundations of Love numbers and surveys the most recent advances in the study of tidal effects in compact objects, with particular emphasis on black holes and neutron stars. We begin with a gentle introduction to tidal effects in Newtonian gravity, leading into a discussion of how to robustly define tidal responses in general relativity using the effective field theory and post-Newtonian frameworks. After an overview of the perturbation theory of black holes and neutron stars, we review the computation of Love numbers and dissipative response coefficients in a wide range of settings, including the static, dynamical, and nonlinear tidal responses of Kerr black holes and neutron stars in four-dimensional general relativity. We further discuss the extension of these results to charged black holes and a number of "new physics" scenarios, including higher-dimensional black holes and other black objects, (anti-) de Sitter black holes, supergravity black holes, and theories beyond general relativity. Finally we provide an overview of the tantalizing zoo of hidden symmetries of general relativity that have been uncovered in the attempt to explain the famous vanishing of static black hole Love numbers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review article provides a comprehensive and pedagogical account of the theoretical foundations of Love numbers for gravitating bodies, with emphasis on black holes and neutron stars. It begins with Newtonian tidal effects, defines tidal responses in GR via EFT and PN frameworks, overviews perturbation theory, reviews computations of static/dynamical/nonlinear responses for Kerr BHs and NSs in 4D GR, extends to charged BHs, higher-dimensional cases, AdS, supergravity, and modified gravity, and surveys hidden symmetries explaining the vanishing of static BH Love numbers.

Significance. If the survey is complete and accurate, the manuscript is significant as a unifying pedagogical resource that consolidates recent advances in tidal deformability. These coefficients enter GW waveforms during inspiral and will be measurable by LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA and future detectors; the coverage of foundations, extensions to new physics, and hidden symmetries offers a valuable reference for both newcomers and researchers working on waveform modeling and tests of GR.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses the informal phrase 'tantalizing zoo of hidden symmetries'; in a formal review this could be replaced by a more neutral description such as 'rich structure of hidden symmetries' while still highlighting the topic.
  2. [Newtonian introduction] In the section introducing Newtonian tidal effects, adding a brief explicit comparison (e.g., how the Newtonian Love number k_l relates to the GR tidal deformability parameter) would strengthen the pedagogical transition to the EFT/PN definitions that follow.
  3. [Hidden symmetries overview] The overview of hidden symmetries would benefit from a summary table listing the key symmetries, the spacetimes in which they appear, and their implications for static versus dynamical Love numbers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, for the accurate summary of its scope, and for recommending acceptance. We are pleased that the pedagogical approach and coverage of recent advances in tidal deformability were viewed positively.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review article with no original derivations; no circularity detected

full rationale

This paper is explicitly a review that surveys and pedagogically presents existing literature on tidal Love numbers across Newtonian, GR, EFT, PN, and modified-gravity settings. It contains no new derivations, computations, or equations that reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. All referenced results are drawn from prior independent literature, with the paper's role limited to compilation and explanation rather than claiming novel predictions or uniqueness theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it summarizes established frameworks from general relativity and extensions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1031 out tokens · 73436 ms · 2026-05-10T17:27:28.252140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Axial tidal Love numbers of black holes in matter environments

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axial tidal Love numbers for black holes in anisotropic fluid environments are derived analytically and numerically, with non-compact support density profiles producing logarithmic terms that obstruct standard tidal m...

  2. Dynamical tidal Love numbers of black holes under generic perturbations: Connecting black hole perturbation theory with effective field theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dynamical tidal Love numbers for Kerr black holes are obtained to linear frequency order by matching EFT worldline couplings to black-hole perturbation solutions, including spin-induced mode mixing.

  3. Tidal Response and Thermodynamics of Black Holes

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new gauge-invariant effective action computes black hole Love numbers without Regge-Wheeler methods, and these numbers determine leading thermodynamic corrections under external perturbations.

  4. Static Tidal Perturbations of Relativistic Stars: Corrected Center Expansion and Love Numbers-I

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 4.0

    Corrects the subleading term in the center Frobenius expansion for interior even-parity perturbations of relativistic stars without altering computed Love numbers k2, while extending the static even-parity formalism t...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

296 extracted references · 265 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. arXiv:1602.03837

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    A. G. Abac, et al. (LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, Astrophys. J. Lett. 995 (2025) L18. doi:10.3847/ 2041-8213/ae0c06.arXiv:2508.18080

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth ligo–virgo–kagra observing run (2025).arXiv:arXiv:2508.18082

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    A. G. Abac, et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Open Data from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA through the First Part of the Fourth Observing Run (2025).arXiv:2508.18079

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    T. L. S. Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc -4.0: Con- straints on the cosmic expansion rate and modified gravitational -wave propagation (2025). arXiv:arXiv:2509.04348

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, et al., Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv e-prints (2017).arXiv:1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    S. L. Shapiro, S. A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects, Wiley, New York, 1983

    1983

  8. [8]

    Damour, The Motion of Compact Bodies and Gravitational Radiation, Fundam

    T. Damour, The Motion of Compact Bodies and Gravitational Radiation, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 9 (1984) 89–106. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6469-3_7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6469-3_7 1984

  9. [9]

    and Esposito-Far

    T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese, Testing gravity to second postNewtonian order: A Field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 5541–5578. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5541. arXiv:gr-qc/9506063

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.5541 1996

  10. [10]

    W. D. Goldberger, I. Z. Rothstein, An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104029. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104029.arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.104029.arxiv:hep-th/0409156 2006

  11. [11]

    W. D. Goldberger, I. Z. Rothstein, Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104030. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104030.arXiv:hep-th/0511133

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.104030.arxiv:hep-th/0511133 2006

  12. [12]

    R. A. Porto, Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 104031. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104031.arXiv:gr-qc/0511061

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.104031.arxiv:gr-qc/0511061 2006

  13. [13]

    R. A. Porto, Absorption effects due to spin in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 064026. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.064026.arXiv:0710.5150

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.064026.arxiv:0710.5150 2008

  14. [14]

    E. E. Flanagan, T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 021502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502.arXiv:0709.1915

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.021502.arxiv:0709.1915 2008

  15. [15]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

    T. Hinderer, Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 677 (2008) 1216–1220. doi:10.1086/ 533487.arXiv:0711.2420

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    H. Fang, G. Lovelace, Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and circularly orbiting moon, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 124016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.124016.arXiv:gr-qc/0505156

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.124016.arxiv:gr-qc/0505156 2005

  17. [17]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084035. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084035.arXiv:0906.0096. 161

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084035.arxiv:0906.0096 2009

  18. [18]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    T. Binnington, E. Poisson, Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084018.arXiv:0906.1366

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084018.arxiv:0906.1366 2009

  19. [19]

    B. Kol, M. Smolkin, Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization, JHEP 02 (2012) 010. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)010.arXiv:1110.3764

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2012)010.arxiv:1110.3764 2012

  20. [20]

    New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spec- troscopy and dynamic tides,

    S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate, J. Steinhoff, New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spectroscopy and dynamic tides (2013).arXiv:1304.2228

    work page arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating black hole,

    E. Poisson, Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 044004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.044004.arXiv:1411.4711

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.044004.arxiv:1411.4711 2015

  22. [22]

    No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments

    N. Gürlebeck, No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 151102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.151102.arXiv:1503.03240

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.151102.arxiv:1503.03240 2015

  23. [23]

    Landry and E

    P. Landry, E. Poisson, Tidal deformation of a slowly rotating material body. External metric, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 104018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.104018.arXiv:1503.07366

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.104018.arxiv:1503.07366 2015

  24. [24]

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, A. Maselli, V. Ferrari, Tidal deformations of a spinning compact object, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 024010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.024010.arXiv:1503.07365

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.024010.arxiv:1503.07365 2015

  25. [25]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, Static response and Love num- bers of Schwarzschild black holes, JCAP 04 (2021) 052. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/052. arXiv:2010.00593

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/052 2021

  26. [26]

    Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love,

    A. Le Tiec, M. Casals, Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 131102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.131102.arXiv:2007.00214

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.131102.arxiv:2007.00214 2021

  27. [27]

    Tidal love num- bers of kerr black holes,

    A. Le Tiec, M. Casals, E. Franzin, Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 084021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084021.arXiv:2010.15795

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.084021.arxiv:2010.15795 2021

  28. [28]

    H. S. Chia, Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 024013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024013.arXiv:2010.07300

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.024013.arxiv:2010.07300 2021

  29. [29]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li, I. Z. Rothstein, Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory, JHEP 06 (2021) 053. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)053.arXiv:2012.14869

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)053.arxiv:2012.14869 2021

  30. [30]

    On the vanishing of love numbers for kerr black holes,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, M. M. Ivanov, On the Vanishing of Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes, JHEP 05 (2021) 038. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)038.arXiv:2102.08917

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)038.arxiv:2102.08917 2021

  31. [31]

    F. K. Manasse, Distortion in the metric of a small center of gravitational attraction due to its proximity to a very large mass, Journal of Mathematical Physics 4 (1963) 746–761. URL:https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1724317. doi:10.1063/1.1724317

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1724317 1963

  32. [32]

    J. B. Hartle, Tidal Friction in Slowly Rotating Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1010–1024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.8.1010 1973

  33. [33]

    J. B. Hartle, Tidal shapes and shifts on rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2749–2759. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2749

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.2749 1974

  34. [34]

    S. W. Hawking, J. B. Hartle, Energy and Angular Momentum Flow into a Black Hole, Commun. Math. Phys. 27 (1972) 283–290. doi:10.1007/BF01645515

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01645515 1972

  35. [35]

    P. D. D’Eath, Dynamics of a small black hole in a background universe, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 1387–1403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.1387

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.1387 1975

  36. [36]

    P. D. D’Eath, Black holes: Gravitational interactions, 1996. 162

    1996

  37. [37]

    Poisson, Metric of a tidally distorted, nonrotating black hole, Phys

    E. Poisson, Metric of a tidally distorted, nonrotating black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 161103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.161103.arXiv:gr-qc/0501032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.161103.arxiv:gr-qc/0501032 2005

  38. [38]

    Taylor, E

    S. Taylor, E. Poisson, Nonrotating black hole in a post-Newtonian tidal environment, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 084016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.084016.arXiv:0806.3052

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.084016.arxiv:0806.3052 2008

  39. [39]

    On the gravitational polarizability of black holes,

    T. Damour, O. M. Lecian, On the gravitational polarizability of black holes, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 044017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.044017.arXiv:0906.3003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.044017.arxiv:0906.3003 2009

  40. [40]

    R. A. Porto, The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 723–729. doi:10.1002/prop.201600064.arXiv:1606.08895

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201600064.arxiv:1606.08895 2016

  41. [41]

    Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, M. M. Ivanov, Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 101101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.101101.arXiv:2103.01234

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.101101.arxiv:2103.01234 2021

  42. [42]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems, JCAP 01 (2022) 032. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/032. arXiv:2105.01069

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/032 2022

  43. [43]

    S. J. Bolton, J. Lunine, D. Stevenson, J. E. P. Connerney, S. Levin, T. C. Owen, F. Bagenal, D. Gautier, A. P. Ingersoll, G. S. Orton, T. Guillot, W. Hubbard, J. Bloxham, A. Coradini, S. K. Stephens, P. Mokashi, R. Thorne, R. Thorpe, The Juno Mission, Space Science Reviews 213 (2017) 5–37. doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0429-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0429-6 2017

  44. [44]

    W. M. Folkner, L. Iess, J. D. Anderson, S. W. Asmar, D. R. Buccino, D. Durante, M. Feldman, L. Gomez Casajus, M. Gregnanin, A. Milani, M. Parisi, R. S. Park, D. Serra, G. Tommei, P. Tortora, M. Zannoni, S. J. Bolton, J. E. P. Connerney, S. M. Levin, Jupiter gravity field estimated from the first two Juno orbits, Geophysical Research Letters 44 (2017) 4694...

    work page doi:10.1002/2017gl073140 2017

  45. [45]

    Lai, Jupiter’s dynamical love number, 2021

    D. Lai, Jupiter’s dynamical love number, 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06186. arXiv:2103.06186

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    S. M. Wahl, M. Parisi, W. M. Folkner, W. B. Hubbard, B. Militzer, Equilibrium Tidal Response of Jupiter: Detectability by the Juno Spacecraft, The Astrophysical Journal 891 (2020) 42. doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ab6cf9.arXiv:2001.03695

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Idini, D

    B. Idini, D. J. Stevenson, The lost meaning of jupiter’s high-degree love numbers, The Planetary Science Journal 3 (2022) 11. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ac4248. doi:10.3847/psj/ac4248

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac4248 2022

  48. [48]

    J. D. Anderson, G. Schubert, Saturn’s Gravitational Field, Internal Rotation, and Interior Structure, Science 317 (2007) 1384. doi:10.1126/science.1144835

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1144835 2007

  49. [49]

    Fuller, T

    J. Fuller, T. Guillot, S. Mathis, C. Murray, Tidal Dissipation in Giant Planets, Space Science Reviews 220 (2024) 22. doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01055-4.arXiv:2402.05338

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01055-4.arxiv:2402.05338 2024

  50. [50]

    D. Kong, K. Zhang, G. Schubert, A Fully Self-consistent Multi-layered Model of Jupiter, The Astrophysical Journal 826 (2016) 127. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/127

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/127 2016

  51. [51]

    Miguel, T

    Y. Miguel, T. Guillot, L. Fayon, Jupiter internal structure: the effect of different equations of state, Astronomy & Astrophysics 596 (2016) A114. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629732. arXiv:1609.05460

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629732 2016

  52. [52]

    W. B. Hubbard, B. Militzer, A Preliminary Jupiter Model, The Astrophysical Journal 820 (2016) 80. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/80.arXiv:1602.05143

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/80.arxiv:1602.05143 2016

  53. [53]

    Ni, Empirical models of Jupiter’s interior from Juno data

    D. Ni, Empirical models of Jupiter’s interior from Juno data. Moment of inertia and tidal Love number k2, Astronomy & Astrophysics 613 (2018) A32. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732183. 163

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732183 2018

  54. [54]

    S. V. Chernov, P. B. Ivanov, J. C. B. Papaloizou, Dynamical tides in exoplanetary systems containing hot jupiters: confronting theory and observations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 470 (2017) 2054–2068. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1234. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1234

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1234 2017

  55. [55]

    E. A. van Dijk, Y. Miguel, Retrieving interior properties of hot Jupiters with Love numbers and atmospheric measurements, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 540 (2025) 1544–1559. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf814.arXiv:2505.10304

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf814.arxiv:2505.10304 2025

  56. [56]

    Chakraborty, P

    S. Chakraborty, P. Pani, Tidal response of compact objects, Living Rev. Rel. (2026)

    2026

  57. [58]

    M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou, M. M. Ivanov, Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 064058. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064058. arXiv:2307.10391

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.064058 2024

  58. [59]

    A. E. H. Love, Earth, the yielding of the, to disturbing forces, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 69 (1909) 476. doi:10.1093/mnras/69.6.476

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/69.6.476 1909

  59. [60]

    A. E. H. Love, Some Problems of Geodynamics, 1911

    1911

  60. [61]

    Shida, On the elasticity of the earth and the earth’s crust, Memoirs of the College of Science and Engineering, Kyoto Imperial University 4 (1912) 1–286

    T. Shida, On the elasticity of the earth and the earth’s crust, Memoirs of the College of Science and Engineering, Kyoto Imperial University 4 (1912) 1–286

    1912

  61. [62]

    Damour, Le problème des N corps en relativité générale, in: Journées relativistes (Grenoble), pp 2-14, 1981

    T. Damour, Le problème des N corps en relativité générale, in: Journées relativistes (Grenoble), pp 2-14, 1981

    1981

  62. [63]

    Damour, Gravitational radiation and the motion of compact bodies, in: Les Houches Summer School on Gravitational Radiation, 1982

    T. Damour, Gravitational radiation and the motion of compact bodies, in: Les Houches Summer School on Gravitational Radiation, 1982. Edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran, North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 59. Available online athttps://www.ihes.fr/~damour/publications/27-83.pdf

    1982

  63. [64]

    Poisson, Phys

    E. Poisson, Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian operational definition for tidally induced multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 064023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.064023.arXiv:2012.10184

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.064023.arxiv:2012.10184 2021

  64. [65]

    Poisson, C

    E. Poisson, C. M. Will, Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic, Cambridge University Press,

  65. [66]

    doi:10.1017/CBO9781139507486

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139507486

  66. [67]

    G. I. Ogilvie, Tidal Dissipation in Stars and Giant Planets, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 (2014) 171–210. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035941.arXiv:1406.2207

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035941.arxiv:1406.2207 2014

  67. [68]

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, V. Ferrari, Tidal Love numbers of a slowly spinning neutron star, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 124003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.124003.arXiv:1509.02171

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.124003.arxiv:1509.02171 2015

  68. [69]

    K. S. Thorne, J. B. Hartle, Laws of motion and precession for black holes and other bodies, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1984) 1815–1837. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1815

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.1815 1984

  69. [70]

    S. A. Hughes, Evolution of circular, nonequatorial orbits of Kerr black holes due to gravitational wave emission. II. Inspiral trajectories and gravitational wave forms, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.064004. arXiv:gr-qc/0104041, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 88, 109902 (2013)]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.064004 2001

  70. [71]

    Poisson, I

    E. Poisson, I. Vlasov, Geometry and dynamics of a tidally deformed black hole, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 024029. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.024029.arXiv:0910.4311

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.024029.arxiv:0910.4311 2010

  71. [72]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044022 , eid =

    K. Chatziioannou, E. Poisson, N. Yunes, Tidal heating and torquing of a Kerr black hole to next-to- leading order in the tidal coupling, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 044022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044022. arXiv:1211.1686. 164

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.044022 2013

  72. [73]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes, JHEP 09 (2022) 049. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)049.arXiv:2203.08832

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)049.arxiv:2203.08832 2022

  73. [74]

    JCAP 06:056

    R. Berens, L. Hui, Z. Sun, Ladder symmetries of black holes and de Sitter space: love numbers and quasinormal modes, JCAP 06 (2023) 056. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/056. arXiv:2212.09367

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/056 2023

  74. [75]

    M. Rai, L. Santoni, Ladder symmetries and Love numbers of Reissner-Nordström black holes, JHEP 07 (2024) 098. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)098.arXiv:2404.06544

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)098.arxiv:2404.06544 2024

  75. [76]

    Symmetries of vanishing nonlinear Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes,

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, L. Hui, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, S. S. C. Wong, Symmetries of vanishing nonlinear Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, JHEP 03 (2025) 124. doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2025)124.arXiv:2410.10952

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [77]

    JCAP 05:039

    A. Kehagias, A. Riotto, Black holes in a gravitational field: the non-linear static love number of Schwarzschild black holes vanishes, JCAP 05 (2025) 039. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/039. arXiv:2410.11014

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/039 2025

  77. [78]

    L. R. Gounis, A. Kehagias, A. Riotto, The vanishing of the non-linear static love number of Kerr black holes and the role of symmetries, JCAP 03 (2025) 002. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/002. arXiv:2412.08249

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/002 2025

  78. [79]

    Love symmetry,

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, M. M. Ivanov, Love symmetry, JHEP 10 (2022) 175. doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2022)175.arXiv:2209.02091

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [80]

    Naturalness of vanishing black-hole tides,

    J. Parra-Martinez, A. Podo, Naturalness of vanishing black-hole tides (2025).arXiv:2510.20694

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [81]

    B. P. Abbott, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119. 161101.arXiv:1710.05832

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119 2017

Showing first 80 references.