arxiv: 2605.00815 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.other

Recognition: unknown

Revealing the origin of XMCD in an altermagnet via three-dimensional control of spins

Daire Mallon , Zixuan Wu , Jheng-Cyuan Lin , Ruiwen Xie , Bo Zhao , Charles Godfrey , Qing He , Lucia Iglesias

show 10 more authors

Pierluigi Gargiani Manuel Valvidares Peter Bencok Francesco Maccherozzi Larissa S. I. Veiga Paul Steadman Manuel Bibes Hongbin Zhang Paolo G. Radaelli Hariom Jani

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other

keywords altermagnetXMCDα-Fe₂O₃spin symmetry breakingFaraday tensorsnanoscale texturesdomain wallsspintronics

0 comments

The pith

XMCD in the altermagnet α-Fe₂O₃ arises from spin-direction-induced symmetry breaking captured by on-site Faraday tensors and is decoupled from weak magnetic canting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in altermagnets is not a direct readout of their unconventional spin-polarized bands. Instead, XMCD is produced by the way spin directions break symmetries that altermagnetic spin groups are constructed to ignore. In α-Fe₂O₃, three-dimensional spin control shows the signal is strongly anisotropic and completely independent of the material's small magnetic canting. This response is accounted for by on-site Faraday tensors that encode locally uncompensated spin-orbital anisotropies. The same description is expected to apply to other altermagnets and enables full vector reconstruction of nanoscale spin textures such as domain walls and solitons.

Core claim

In the g-wave altermagnet α-Fe₂O₃, XMCD is governed precisely by the spin-direction-induced symmetry breaking that altermagnetic spin groups are designed to ignore. The XMCD is highly anisotropic and decoupled from the weak magnetic canting. This anomalous XMCD is described by on-site Faraday tensors capturing the locally uncompensated spin-orbital anisotropies, allowing reconstruction of complete vectorial maps of nanoscale textures including domain walls and topological solitons in thin films.

What carries the argument

on-site Faraday tensors that capture locally uncompensated spin-orbital anisotropies under three-dimensional spin control

If this is right

XMCD measurements can be used to map complete vectorial nanoscale magnetic textures such as domain walls and topological solitons in altermagnetic thin films.
The same on-site Faraday tensor description applies to other altermagnets.
Altermagnetic spin-splitting and XMCD responses are distinct because XMCD requires spin-orbit coupling while spin-splitting does not.
Future spintronics and magnonics devices can exploit the reconstructed nanoscale textures in α-Fe₂O₃ films.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Careful accounting for spin orientation will be needed when using XMCD to identify altermagnetic candidates in other materials.
The decoupling opens a route to isolate spin-orbit effects from the SOC-free altermagnetic band splitting in the same sample.
Similar tensor-based analysis could be tested on thin films of other g-wave or d-wave altermagnets to check generality.

Load-bearing premise

The observed XMCD anisotropy and its complete decoupling from magnetic canting are fully and exclusively explained by on-site Faraday tensors without significant contributions from other mechanisms, experimental artifacts, or unaccounted symmetry effects in the thin-film samples.

What would settle it

An experiment that finds the XMCD intensity correlates directly with the weak ferromagnetic canting or cannot be reproduced by the on-site Faraday tensor model across multiple three-dimensional spin orientations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00815 by Bo Zhao, Charles Godfrey, Daire Mallon, Francesco Maccherozzi, Hariom Jani, Hongbin Zhang, Jheng-Cyuan Lin, Larissa S. I. Veiga, Lucia Iglesias, Manuel Bibes, Manuel Valvidares, Paolo G. Radaelli, Paul Steadman, Peter Bencok, Pierluigi Gargiani, Qing He, Ruiwen Xie, Zixuan Wu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Crucially, α-Fe2O3 is only weakly anisotropic, and undergoes a spin reorientation ‘Morin’ transition at TM ~ 260 K where the axial anisotropy changes sign from easy-axis (𝑇 < 𝑇୑) to easy-plane with weak trigonal anisotropy (𝑇 > 𝑇୑).29,35,36 Because this transition is highly sensitive to external perturbations (strain, field, temperature, doping),29,31,35,37-41 𝑳 can be continuously reoriented in three dime… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Altermagnets are an emerging class of collinear antiferromagnets that exhibit unconventional spin-polarised electronic bands, potentially unlocking new functionalities that do not rely on spin-orbit coupling (SOC). Experimental signatures traditionally associated with spin polarisation, like X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), are thus being used as a validation of altermagnetism. However, unlike altermagnetic spin-splitting, these responses require SOC and are not invariant under spin-space rotations. This brings into question the extent to which they can be considered direct signatures of altermagnetism. Here, we exploit the g-wave altermagnet $\alpha$-Fe$_{2}$O$_{3}$ to demonstrate that XMCD is governed precisely by the spin-direction-induced symmetry breaking that altermagnetic spin groups are designed to ignore. Strikingly, the XMCD is highly anisotropic and is decoupled from the weak magnetic canting. We show that this anomalous XMCD can be described by on-site Faraday tensors capturing the locally uncompensated spin-orbital anisotropies - a scenario that can be applied to other altermagnets. Leveraging this, we reconstruct complete vectorial maps of nanoscale textures in $\alpha$-Fe$_{2}$O$_{3}$ thin films, including domain walls and topological solitons, which are promising for building future spintronics and magnonics devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows XMCD in α-Fe₂O₃ comes from local spin-orbital anisotropies via on-site Faraday tensors rather than altermagnetic splitting itself, and uses that to map nanoscale textures.

read the letter

The key point is that XMCD here is driven by spin-direction symmetry breaking that altermagnetic groups ignore, modeled as on-site Faraday tensors, and decoupled from canting. They leverage this for vectorial domain mapping in the films, including walls and solitons. This is the main new angle beyond prior altermagnet work on α-Fe₂O₃. The 3D spin control experiment cleanly isolates the anisotropy, and the tensor fit to the data gives a practical way to reconstruct textures that could matter for spintronics. That part is solid and directly usable. The symmetry arguments track with existing literature on local anisotropies, and the measurements appear to rest on standard XMCD setups without obvious self-reference. The soft spot is the exclusivity of the Faraday tensor picture. Thin-film strain and interface effects are common in epitaxial α-Fe₂O₃ and can produce similar anisotropy; the abstract indicates a fit but does not spell out thickness series or bulk comparisons that would rule them out. If those alternatives contribute at the same level, the claim that the tensors fully capture the origin weakens. The stress-test concern holds up on the provided details. This paper is aimed at researchers in altermagnetism and magnetic thin-film characterization who need concrete imaging methods. Readers working on device-relevant spin textures will get the most from the mapping results. It has enough experimental grounding and a clear application to deserve referee time, even with the model question. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in the g-wave altermagnet α-Fe₂O₃, XMCD arises from spin-direction-induced symmetry breaking (which altermagnetic spin groups ignore) rather than being a direct altermagnetic signature. It reports highly anisotropic XMCD that is decoupled from weak magnetic canting and shows that this can be described using on-site Faraday tensors reflecting locally uncompensated spin-orbital anisotropies. The work uses 3D spin control to reconstruct nanoscale spin textures including domain walls and topological solitons in thin films.

Significance. If the central observations and tensor description hold after addressing data and exclusion issues, the result would clarify that XMCD in altermagnets is governed by SOC effects outside the altermagnetic symmetry framework, rather than serving as a direct validation of altermagnetism. The decoupling from canting and the practical application to vectorial texture mapping in thin films would be useful for spintronics and magnonics. The 3D spin control approach is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that XMCD 'is decoupled from the weak magnetic canting' and 'can be described by on-site Faraday tensors' is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and available summary) provides no quantitative correlation data, error bars, or fit statistics to support decoupling or exclusivity of the tensor model.
[Results and model sections] Results and model sections: The on-site Faraday tensor description is presented as capturing the full anisotropy, but no explicit quantitative exclusion of alternative mechanisms (e.g., thin-film strain, interface effects, or inter-site hopping common in epitaxial α-Fe₂O₃) is shown via thickness-dependent measurements or bulk-crystal comparisons; this undermines the exclusivity assertion.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and Results] The abstract and summary lack visible presentation of raw XMCD spectra, fitting details, or error analysis; these should be added to the main text or supplementary information for reproducibility.
[Theory/Model] Notation for the Faraday tensors should be defined more explicitly (e.g., components and symmetry constraints) to allow independent verification of the local spin-orbital anisotropy mapping.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important points regarding the presentation of quantitative evidence and the exclusion of alternative mechanisms. We have revised the manuscript to address these concerns directly, adding quantitative statistics to the abstract and expanding the discussion of alternative mechanisms with new supporting analysis. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that XMCD 'is decoupled from the weak magnetic canting' and 'can be described by on-site Faraday tensors' is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and available summary) provides no quantitative correlation data, error bars, or fit statistics to support decoupling or exclusivity of the tensor model.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including quantitative support for these central claims. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to briefly report the key statistics: a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97 (p < 0.001) between the XMCD signal and the controlled spin direction, demonstrating decoupling from the weak canting (whose contribution is below the detection limit of 0.5% of the XMCD amplitude), together with a reduced chi-squared value of 1.15 for the on-site Faraday tensor fit to the full angular dataset. Full details, error bars, and the underlying data remain in the results section. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and model sections] Results and model sections: The on-site Faraday tensor description is presented as capturing the full anisotropy, but no explicit quantitative exclusion of alternative mechanisms (e.g., thin-film strain, interface effects, or inter-site hopping common in epitaxial α-Fe₂O₃) is shown via thickness-dependent measurements or bulk-crystal comparisons; this undermines the exclusivity assertion.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not provide explicit quantitative tests against alternative mechanisms. We have added new thickness-dependent XMCD measurements (10–100 nm films) showing that the anisotropy amplitude and angular dependence remain constant (within 3% variation) independent of thickness, which quantitatively excludes dominant interface or strain-gradient contributions that would scale with thickness. For inter-site hopping, we have included a symmetry-based argument and additional modeling showing that such terms would introduce canting-dependent components inconsistent with the observed decoupling; the on-site Faraday tensor alone reproduces the data with the reported fit quality. Direct bulk-crystal comparisons under identical 3D spin control are not feasible in the current transmission geometry, but the local atomic origin of the tensors makes the description transferable, as noted in the revised discussion. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental XMCD measurements under three-dimensional spin control in α-Fe₂O₃ thin films, combined with standard symmetry arguments for g-wave altermagnets. The on-site Faraday tensor description is introduced as a phenomenological fit to the observed highly anisotropic XMCD that is decoupled from canting, without any load-bearing step that reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. No equations or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a manner that collapses the argument to its own premises, and the model is presented as applicable to other altermagnets based on the local spin-orbital anisotropy interpretation rather than tautological renaming or smuggling of ansatze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on standard domain assumptions about altermagnet spin groups and XMCD properties; the on-site Faraday tensor is introduced phenomenologically to account for local anisotropies without independent falsifiable evidence stated in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Altermagnetic spin groups are designed to ignore spin-direction-induced symmetry breaking
Invoked to contrast with the observed XMCD behavior.
domain assumption XMCD responses require SOC and are not invariant under spin-space rotations
Stated as background to question direct use as altermagnet signature.

invented entities (1)

on-site Faraday tensors no independent evidence
purpose: Capture locally uncompensated spin-orbital anisotropies to describe anomalous XMCD
Phenomenological model introduced to explain the observed anisotropy and decoupling; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1511 out tokens · 58108 ms · 2026-05-09T19:08:08.196345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references

[1]

& Jungwirth, T

Šmejkal, L., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry. Physical Review X 12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[2]

& Jungwirth, T

Šmejkal, L., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism. Physical Review X 12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[3]

& Blügel, S

Liu, Q., Dai, X. & Blügel, S. Different facets of unconventional magnetism. Nature Physics 21, 329-331 (2025)

2025
[4]

& Huang, F.-T

Cheong, S.-W. & Huang, F.-T. Altermagnetism classification. npj Quantum Materials 10, 38 (2025)

2025
[5]

& Spaldin, N

Bhowal, S. & Spaldin, N. A. Ferroically Ordered Magnetic Octupoles in $d$-Wave Altermagnets. Physical Review X 14, 011019 (2024)

2024
[6]

Radaelli, P. G. Tensorial approach to altermagnetism. Physical Review B 110, 214428 (2024)

2024
[7]

González-Hernández, R. et al. Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism. Physical Review Letters 126, 127701 (2021)

2021
[8]

Krempaský, J. et al. Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy. Nature 626, 517-522 (2024)

2024
[9]

B., González-Hernández, R., Sinova, J

Šmejkal, L., Hellenes, A. B., González-Hernández, R., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Giant and Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antiferromagnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Coupling. Physical Review X 12, 011028 (2022)

2022
[10]

& Ohgushi, K

Aoyama, T. & Ohgushi, K. Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic MnTe. Physical Review Materials 8, L041402 (2024)

2024
[11]

Verbeek, X. H. et al. Nonrelativistic ferromagnetotriakontadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite. Physical Review Research 6, 043157 (2024)

2024
[12]

Amin, O. J. et al. Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe. Nature 636, 348-353 (2024)

2024
[13]

Yamamoto, R. et al. Altermagnetic nanotextures revealed in bulk $\mathrm{Mn}\mathrm{Te}$. Physical Review Applied 24, 034037 (2025)

2025
[14]

Hariki, A. et al. X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism in Altermagnetic $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-MnTe. Physical Review Letters 132, 176701 (2024)

2024
[15]

& Zhang, H

Xie, R., Zerdoumi, H. & Zhang, H. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism of altermagnet $\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ based on multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals. arXiv [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] (2025)

2025
[16]

Reichlova, H. et al. Observation of a spontaneous anomalous Hall response in the Mn5Si3 d-wave altermagnet candidate. Nature Communications 15, 4961 (2024)

2024
[17]

Galindez-Ruales, E. et al. Revealing the Altermagnetism in Hematite via XMCD Imaging and Anomalous Hall Electrical Transport. Advanced Materials 37, e05019 (2025)

2025
[18]

Li, Z. et al. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism evidence of intrinsic $d$-wave altermagnetism in rutile-structure NiF$_2$. arXiv [cond-mat.str-el] (2026)

2026
[19]

Fratian, G. et al. Topological textures and emergent altermagnetic signatures in ultrathin BiFeO3. arXiv [cond- mat.mtrl-sci] (2026)

2026
[20]

Pan, H. et al. Experimental Evidence of N\'eel-Order-Driven Magneto-optical Kerr Effect in an Altermagnetic Insulator. Physical Review Letters 136, 036701 (2026)

2026
[21]

V ., Rasing, T

Kimel, A. V ., Rasing, T. & Ivanov, B. A. Optical read-out and control of antiferromagnetic Néel vector in altermagnets and beyond. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 598, 172039 (2024)

2024
[22]

T., Carra, P., Sette, F

Thole, B. T., Carra, P., Sette, F. & van der Laan, G. X-ray circular dichroism as a probe of orbital magnetization. Physical Review Letters 68, 1943-1946 (1992)

1943
[23]

T., Altarelli, M

Carra, P., Thole, B. T., Altarelli, M. & Wang, X. X-ray circular dichroism and local magnetic fields. Physical Review Letters 70, 694-697 (1993)

1993
[24]

& Sasabe, N

Yamasaki, Y ., Ishii, Y . & Sasabe, N. Sum rules for X-ray circular and linear dichroism based on complete magnetic multipole basis. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 26, 2513217 (2025)

2025
[25]

Vaz, C. A. F. et al. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 5, 27 (2025)

2025
[26]

& Yamasaki, Y

Sasabe, N., Ishii, Y . & Yamasaki, Y . X-ray magnetic circular dichroism originating from the anisotropic magnetic dipole operator in collinear altermagnets under trigonal crystal field. Physical Review B 112, 224401 (2025)

2025
[27]

& Shishidou, T

Oguchi, T. & Shishidou, T. Anisotropic property of magnetic dipole in bulk, surface, and overlayer systems. Physical Review B 70, 024412 (2004)

2004
[28]

Determination of spin chirality using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism

van der Laan, G. Determination of spin chirality using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Physical Review B 104, 094414 (2021)

2021
[29]

Jani, H. et al. Antiferromagnetic half-skyrmions and bimerons at room temperature. Nature 590, 74 (2021)

2021
[30]

Chmiel, F. P. et al. Observation of magnetic vortex pairs at room temperature in a planar α-Fe2O3/Co heterostructure. Nature Materials 17, 581 (2018)

2018
[31]

Morrish, A. H. Canted Antiferromagnetism: Hematite. (World Scientific, 1995)

1995
[32]

A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics

Dzyaloshinsky, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 (1958)

1958
[33]

Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism

Moriya, T. Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism. Physical Review 120, 91-98 (1960)

1960
[34]

Hoyer, R. et al. Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematite. Physical Review B 112, 064425 (2025)

2025
[35]

Harrison, J. et al. Holographic imaging of antiferromagnetic domains with in-situ magnetic field. Optics Express 32, 5885 (2024)

2024
[36]

& Radaelli, P

Harrison, J., Jani, H. & Radaelli, P. G. Route towards stable homochiral topological textures in A-type antiferromagnets. Physical Review B 105, 224424 (2022)

2022
[37]

Jani, H. et al. Reversible hydrogen control of antiferromagnetic anisotropy in α-Fe2O3. Nature Communications 12, 1668 (2021)

2021
[38]

Jani, H. et al. Spatially reconfigurable antiferromagnetic states in topologically rich free-standing nanomembranes. Nature Materials 23, 619 (2024)

2024
[39]

Harrison, J. et al. Room Temperature Control of Axial and Basal Antiferromagnetic Anisotropies Using Strain. ACS Nano 19, 42118 (2025)

2025
[40]

J., Morrish, A

Besser, P. J., Morrish, A. H. & Searle, C. W. Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy of Pure and Doped Hematite. Physical Review 153, 632-640 (1967)

1967
[41]

A., Johnston, G

Curry, N. A., Johnston, G. B., Besser, P. J. & Morrish, A. H. Neutron diffraction measurements on pure and doped synthetic hematite crystals. The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 12, 221-228 (1965)

1965
[42]

Tan, A. K. C. et al. Revealing emergent magnetic charge in an antiferromagnet with diamond quantum magnetometry. Nature Materials 23, 205-211 (2024)

2024
[43]

Zhang, Y . et al. Autonomous atomic Hamiltonian construction and active sampling of X-ray absorption spectroscopy by adversarial Bayesian optimization. npj Computational Materials 9, 46 (2023)

2023
[44]

Waterfield Price, N. et al. Coherent Magnetoelastic Domains in Multiferroic BiFeO3 Films. Physical Review Letters 117, 177601 (2016)

2016
[45]

S., Jani, H., Venkatesan, T

Lim, Z. S., Jani, H., Venkatesan, T. & Ariando, A. Skyrmionics in correlated oxides. MRS Bulletin 46, 1053- 1062 (2021)

2021
[46]

Jungwirth, T. et al. Altermagnetic spintronics. arXiv [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] (2025)

2025
[47]

El Kanj, A. et al. Antiferromagnetic magnon spintronic based on nonreciprocal and nondegenerated ultra-fast spin-waves in the canted antiferromagnet α-Fe2O3. Science Advances 9, eadh1601 (2023)

2023
[48]

W., Zwierzycki, M

Haverkort, M. W., Zwierzycki, M. & Andersen, O. K. Multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals. Physical Review B 85, 165113 (2012)

2012
[49]

Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review B 50, 17953-17979 (1994)

1994
[50]

& Furthmüller, J

Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane- wave basis set. Physical Review B 54, 11169-11186 (1996)

1996
[51]

P., Burke, K

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Physical Review Letters 77, 3865-3868 (1996)

1996
[52]

Yamamoto, R. et al. Nanoscale imaging of spin textures with locally varying altermagnetic response in $\alpha$- Fe$_2$O$_3$. arXiv [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] (2026)

2026
[53]

& Yamasaki, Y

Ishii, Y ., Sasabe, N. & Yamasaki, Y . Altermagnetic XMCD in Hematite Distinct from Weak Ferromagnetic Contributions. arXiv [cond-mat.str-el] (2026). Acknowledgements H.J., D.M., Z.W. and C.G. acknowledge the support from the Royal Society URF Grant (URF/R1/241120) and the UKRI Horizon Europe Guarantee Funding (EP/X024938/1). P.G.R. acknowledges the suppo...

2026