arxiv: 2605.00940 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Interpretable experiential learning based on state history and global feedback

Anton Kolonin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI

keywords interpretable learningexperiential learningreinforcement learningtransition graphstate historyglobal feedbackAtari Breakoutresource-constrained

0 comments

The pith

A transition graph built from state histories and global feedback can match some neural networks at playing Atari Breakout while remaining interpretable and light on resources.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an experiential learning method that constructs an explicit behavioral model as a graph linking sets of observed states. Transitions in the graph carry utility scores and counts of supporting evidence, updated incrementally from the sequence of past states together with overall reward signals. The design targets reinforcement learning problems where heavy neural networks would exceed available memory or processing power. Evaluation on the Atari Breakout environment produced scores comparable to selected neural baselines, supporting the claim that the graph approach can deliver effective control without large function approximators.

Core claim

The model learns a behavioral representation as a transition graph between sets of states, where each transition is annotated with a utility value and an evidence count derived solely from accumulated state history and global feedback signals, and this structure proves sufficient to achieve reinforcement learning performance on Atari Breakout comparable to some known neural network solutions.

What carries the argument

Transition graph whose nodes are sets of states and whose edges carry utility and evidence count attributes updated from history and feedback.

If this is right

Reinforcement learning becomes feasible in memory- and compute-limited settings without relying on neural network training.
The learned behavior remains human-readable because decisions trace directly to specific transitions in the graph.
The approach scales to other discrete control tasks where state histories can be recorded and grouped.
Global feedback can drive incremental updates without requiring backpropagation or gradient-based optimization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The explicit graph could let developers debug or correct agent behavior by inspecting or editing individual transitions.
Evidence counts might naturally support confidence-weighted exploration or safety checks during deployment.
The method could combine with neural components to handle continuous state spaces while retaining interpretability for discrete subsets.
Resource savings could enable on-device reinforcement learning for robotics or embedded control where cloud training is unavailable.

Load-bearing premise

That grouping states into sets and accumulating utilities plus evidence counts from history and global feedback alone can capture the dynamics needed for effective policy learning.

What would settle it

Running the model on Breakout and obtaining average scores substantially below those of the neural network baselines after the same number of training episodes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00940 by Anton Kolonin.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Scores earned in four different runs playing 100 games. Horizontal axis - games from 1 to 100. Vertical axis - scores per game. Blue - “Automated” agent following the game rules based on pre-processed input providing tentative horizontal coordinates of the ball and the paddle. Orange - “Model-based” playing using the model pre-trained by “Automated” agent without the ability to learn. Green - “Model-based”… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Scores obtained in four different runs on different computers while playing 1000 games with a state similarity threshold of SS=0.99. Horizontal axis - games from 1 to 1000. Vertical axis - scores per game. Plots in different colors correspond to different uncontrolled random seeds. The context size is CS=2. The Win and Mac labels in the legend correspond to the computers on which the respective run was run… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Scores obtained in three different runs, including 5000 games with three different fixed random seeds for the state similarity threshold SS=0.9. Horizontal axis - games from 1 to 5000. Vertical axis - scores per game. Scatter points of different colors correspond to different random seeds S (green – S=41, blue – S=2, orange – S=3). Context size CS=2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Average scores in a sliding window of 30 games across three different runs, including 5000 games with three different fixed random seeds for the state similarity threshold SS=0.9. Horizontal axis - games from 1 to 5000. Vertical axis - scores per game. Plots in different colors correspond to different random seeds S (green – S=41, blue – S=2, orange – S=3). Context size CS=2. Numbers in parentheses in the … view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Comparison of the results obtained in different runs of our system with different random seeds (2, 3, 41), and state similarity thresholds (SS=0.9 and SS=0.95) with the results obtained in the works Mnih et al. (2013) and Toromanoff et al. (2019), depending on the number of frames used for learning. 5. Discussion 5.1. Interpretation and Comparison with Prior Art The key observation is that for certain rand… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A new interpretable experiential learning model based on state history and global feedback is presented. It is capable of learning a behavioral model represented by a transition graph between sets of states, with transitions attributed with utility and evidence count. This model is expected to be suitable for solving reinforcement learning problem in resource-constrained environments. The model was thoroughly evaluated on the OpenAI Gym Atari Breakout benchmark, demonstrating performance comparable to some known neural network-based solutions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches a graph-based experiential RL model using state histories and utility labels but supplies almost no mechanics or numbers to back the claims.

read the letter

The central pitch is a transition graph built from state history, with edges carrying utility scores and evidence counts, driven by global feedback. The authors say this gives an interpretable, lightweight alternative to neural nets for RL and report that it reaches performance comparable to some neural baselines on Atari Breakout. That direction is worth noting because resource-constrained and explainable RL are real practical needs. The graph structure could in principle let someone inspect why an action was chosen, which is harder with deep networks. Beyond that, the paper does not show much. The abstract gives no algorithm for grouping states into sets, no update rule for the utilities or evidence counts, no training loop, and no quantitative results or baseline tables. Without those pieces it is impossible to tell whether the model actually learns or simply replays history in a way that happens to work on Breakout. The claim of suitability for edge devices also rests on an unshown assumption that the graph stays small and cheap to maintain. This work would mainly interest people already exploring non-neural RL or trying to add transparency to agents. A reader looking for concrete alternatives to deep RL would get little usable detail here. I would still send it to peer review so the authors can supply the missing steps, equations, and comparisons; the topic is relevant enough that a fuller version deserves a look, but the current draft is too thin to evaluate on its own.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an interpretable experiential learning model that builds a transition graph from state history and global feedback. States are grouped into sets, and transitions between them are annotated with utility values and evidence counts. The approach is positioned as suitable for reinforcement learning in resource-constrained environments, with an evaluation on the OpenAI Gym Atari Breakout benchmark claiming performance comparable to some neural-network baselines.

Significance. If the model construction, update rules, and empirical results hold, the work could provide a transparent, graph-based alternative to black-box neural RL methods, with potential advantages in interpretability and efficiency under resource limits.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of model construction, suitability for resource-constrained RL, and comparable performance on Atari Breakout are asserted without any derivation, algorithm pseudocode, update equations for utility or evidence counts, quantitative metrics (e.g., scores, episodes), or explicit baseline comparisons. This absence prevents evaluation of the weakest assumption that a transition graph built from state history and global feedback can deliver effective RL.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We address the concern regarding the abstract below and have made revisions to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of model construction, suitability for resource-constrained RL, and comparable performance on Atari Breakout are asserted without any derivation, algorithm pseudocode, update equations for utility or evidence counts, quantitative metrics (e.g., scores, episodes), or explicit baseline comparisons. This absence prevents evaluation of the weakest assumption that a transition graph built from state history and global feedback can deliver effective RL.

Authors: We agree that the abstract is high-level and omits explicit details on derivations, equations, pseudocode, and metrics, which is common for abstracts but can hinder immediate evaluation. The full manuscript supplies these elements: model construction and state-set transition graph in Section 2, update rules and equations for utility values and evidence counts in Section 3, the complete algorithm as pseudocode in Algorithm 1, and quantitative results (scores, episodes, and direct comparisons to neural baselines such as DQN) in Section 4 with tables and figures on the Atari Breakout benchmark. To address the comment directly, we have revised the abstract to incorporate a concise summary of the update mechanism, key performance metrics, and baseline comparisons while retaining its brevity. This revision enables readers to assess the core assumption more readily without altering the manuscript's technical content. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The abstract and available description present only a high-level claim of a new transition-graph model learned from state history and global feedback, with empirical evaluation on Atari Breakout showing comparable performance to some neural baselines. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations, or ansatzes are visible that could reduce any load-bearing step to its own inputs by construction. The model is introduced as novel and evaluated externally, making the argument self-contained against benchmarks with no detectable circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract supplies no information sufficient to identify free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5351 in / 1124 out tokens · 56700 ms · 2026-05-09T19:07:54.446732+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Nature , year =

Discovering state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms , author =. Nature , year =. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09761-x , url =

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09761-x
[2]

, title =

Vouros, George A. , title =. ACM Comput. Surv. , month = dec, articleno =. 2022 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3527448 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1145/3527448 2022
[3]

Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Experiential Learning in Discrete and Functional Environments

Kolonin, Anton. Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Experiential Learning in Discrete and Functional Environments. Artificial General Intelligence. 2022

2022
[4]

2025 , eprint=

Computational Concept of the Psyche (in Russian) , author=. 2025 , eprint=

2025
[5]

Trudy Instituta Sistemnego Analiza RAN , volume =

Goal-oriented systems, evolution, and the subjective aspect in systemology , author =. Trudy Instituta Sistemnego Analiza RAN , volume =. 2012 , publisher =

2012
[6]

Ekonomija Economics , author=

Mathematical Theory of Labour Motivation , year=. Ekonomija Economics , author=. doi:None , url=
[7]

Self in the World

Marti-5: A Mathematical Model of "Self in the World" as a First Step Toward Self-Awareness , author=. 2025 , eprint=

2025
[8]

2025 , eprint=

Benchmarking In-context Experiential Learning Through Repeated Product Recommendations , author=. 2025 , eprint=

2025
[9]

Representation learning: a review and new perspectives

Bengio, Yoshua and Courville, Aaron and Vincent, Pascal , title =. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , month = aug, pages =. 2013 , issue_date =. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 2013
[10]

and Sabri, Omar and Said, Wael , TITLE =

Alginahi, Yasser M. and Sabri, Omar and Said, Wael , TITLE =. Machines , VOLUME =. 2025 , NUMBER =

2025
[11]

Opportunities for Reinforcement Learning in Industrial Automation , year=

Xin, Quan and Wu, Guanlin and Fang, Wenqi and Cao, Jiang and Ping, Yang , booktitle=. Opportunities for Reinforcement Learning in Industrial Automation , year=
[12]

Deploying Reinforcement Learning Approaches for Smart Home Automation , year=

Sen, Amit Prakash and Goyal, Manish Kumar and Shalini , booktitle=. Deploying Reinforcement Learning Approaches for Smart Home Automation , year=
[13]

Energies , VOLUME =

Latoń, Dominik and Grela, Jakub and Ożadowicz, Andrzej , TITLE =. Energies , VOLUME =. 2024 , NUMBER =

2024
[14]

Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on MetaOS for the Cloud-Edge-IoT Continuum , pages =

Christopoulos, Marios and Spantideas, Sotirios and Giannopoulos, Anastasios and Trakadas, Panagiotis , title =. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on MetaOS for the Cloud-Edge-IoT Continuum , pages =. 2024 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3642975.3678961 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1145/3642975.3678961 2024
[15]

Accelerating Laboratory Automation Through Robot Skill Learning For Sample Scraping*,

Farooq, Ahmad and Iqbal, Kamran , year=. A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Optimization in Automation , url=. doi:10.1109/case59546.2024.10711718 , booktitle=

work page doi:10.1109/case59546.2024.10711718 2024
[16]

Global Interpretability: A Computational Complexity Perspective , author=

Local vs. Global Interpretability: A Computational Complexity Perspective , author=. 2024 , eprint=

2024
[17]

Process Mining for Unstructured Data: Challenges and Research Directions

Koschmider, Agnes and Aleknonytė-Resch, Milda and Fonger, Frederik and Imenkamp, Christian and Lepsien, Arvid and Apaydin, Kaan and Janssen, Dominik and Langhammer, Dominic and Ziolkowski, Tobias and Zisgen, Yorck. Process Mining for Unstructured Data: Challenges and Research Directions. Modellierung 2024. doi:10.18420/modellierung2024_012

work page doi:10.18420/modellierung2024_012 2024
[18]

2025 , eprint=

Advances in Process Optimization: A Comprehensive Survey of Process Mining, Predictive Process Monitoring, and Process-Aware Recommender Systems , author=. 2025 , eprint=

2025
[19]

and Naddaf, Yavar and Veness, Joel and Bowling, Michael , title =

Bellemare, Marc G. and Naddaf, Yavar and Veness, Joel and Bowling, Michael , title =. J. Artif. Int. Res. , month = may, pages =. 2013 , issue_date =

2013
[20]

Unsupervised state representation learning in atari , year =

Anand, Ankesh and Racah, Evan and Ozair, Sherjil and Bengio, Yoshua and C\^. Unsupervised state representation learning in atari , year =. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =
[21]

2019 , eprint=

Is Deep Reinforcement Learning Really Superhuman on Atari? Leveling the playing field , author=. 2019 , eprint=

2019
[22]

2013 , eprint=

Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning , author=. 2013 , eprint=

2013
[23]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2019 , year =

Recurrent Experience Replay in Distributed Reinforcement Learning , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2019 , year =

2019
[24]

2020 , eprint=

Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies , author=. 2020 , eprint=

2020
[25]

2020 , eprint=

Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmark , author=. 2020 , eprint=

2020
[26]

Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model

Schrittwieser, Julian and Antonoglou, Ioannis and Hubert, Thomas and Simonyan, Karen and Sifre, Laurent and Schmitt, Simon and Guez, Arthur and Lockhart, Edward and Hassabis, Demis and Graepel, Thore and Lillicrap, Timothy and Silver, David , year=. Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model , volume=. Nature , publisher=. doi:1...

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03051-4
[27]

2022 , eprint=

A Survey on Interpretable Reinforcement Learning , author=. 2022 , eprint=

2022
[28]

2023 , eprint=

Interpretable Reinforcement Learning for Robotics and Continuous Control , author=. 2023 , eprint=

2023
[29]

Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing , pages =

Zhao, Chenjing and Deng, Chuanshuai and Liu, Zhenghui and Zhang, Jiexin and Wu, Yunlong and Wang, Yanzhen and Yi, Xiaodong , title =. Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing , pages =. 2023 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3587716.3587798 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1145/3587716.3587798 2023
[30]

1961 , edition =

Wiener, Norbert , title =. 1961 , edition =

1961
[31]

2021 , eprint=

The General Theory of General Intelligence: A Pragmatic Patternist Perspective , author=. 2021 , eprint=

2021
[32]

Papers from the

Wang, Pei , title =. Papers from the. 2006 , pages =

2006
[33]

2011 , publisher =

Thinking, Fast and Slow , author =. 2011 , publisher =

2011
[34]

Pavel Vasilevich Simonov , title =
[35]

Dubynin, V. A. , title =. 2024 , note =

2024
[36]

1968 , address =

von Bertalanffy, Ludwig , title =. 1968 , address =

1968
[37]

Vityaev and A.V

E.E. Vityaev and A.V. Demin , keywords =. Cognitive architecture based on the functional systems theory , journal =. 2018 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.072 , url =

work page doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.072 2018
[38]

Cognitive Architecture of Collective Intelligence Based on Social Evidence , journal =

Anton Kolonin and Evgenii Vityaev and Yuriy Orlov , keywords =. Cognitive Architecture of Collective Intelligence Based on Social Evidence , journal =. 2016 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.467 , url =

work page doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.467 2016
[39]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , volume =

Cisek, Paul , title =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , volume =. 2007 , doi =

2007
[40]

1996 , school =

Wang, Pei , title =. 1996 , school =

1996
[41]

Computable cognitive model based on social evidence and restricted by resources: Applications for personalized search and social media in multi-agent environments , year=

Kolonin, Anton , booktitle=. Computable cognitive model based on social evidence and restricted by resources: Applications for personalized search and social media in multi-agent environments , year=
[42]

2008 , publisher=

Probabilistic Logic Networks: A Comprehensive Framework for Uncertain Inference , author=. 2008 , publisher=

2008
[43]

Vityaev and Leonid I

Evgenii E. Vityaev and Leonid I. Perlovsky and Boris Ya. Kovalerchuk and Stanislav O. Speransky , keywords =. Probabilistic dynamic logic of cognition , journal =. 2013 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2013.06.006 , url =

work page doi:10.1016/j.bica.2013.06.006 2013
[44]

The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11 (2):127–138, 2010

Friston, Karl , title=. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , year=. doi:10.1038/nrn2787 , url=

work page doi:10.1038/nrn2787
[45]

(2024) Introduction to Latent Variable Energy-Based Models: A Path Towards Autonomous Machine IntelligenceJ

Dawid, Anna and LeCun, Yann , year=. Introduction to latent variable energy-based models: a path toward autonomous machine intelligence , volume=. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ad292b , number=

work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ad292b
[46]

1982 , month =

Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel and Slovic, Paul , title =. 1982 , month =

1982
[47]

Theory of Functional Systems: A Keystone of Integrative Biology

Sudakov, Konstantin V. Theory of Functional Systems: A Keystone of Integrative Biology. Anticipation: Learning from the Past: The Russian/Soviet Contributions to the Science of Anticipation. 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19446-2_9

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19446-2_9 2015
[48]

1932 , series =

Bekhterev, Vladimir Mikhailovich , title =. 1932 , series =

1932
[49]

1920 , address =

Freud, Sigmund , title =. 1920 , address =

1920
[50]

2023 , month =

Kryukov, Vladimir Germanovich , title =. 2023 , month =

2023
[51]

and Gorban, Pavel A

Gorban, Alexander N. and Gorban, Pavel A. and Judge, George , TITLE =. Entropy , VOLUME =. 2010 , NUMBER =

2010
[52]

1927 , address =

Adler, Alfred , title =. 1927 , address =

1927
[53]

, title =

Maslow, Abraham H. , title =. 1971 , address =

1971
[54]

Langley , title =

P. Langley , title =. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000) , address =. 2000 , pages =

2000
[55]

T. M. Mitchell. The Need for Biases in Learning Generalizations. 1980

1980
[56]

M. J. Kearns , title =
[57]

Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. I. 1983

1983
[58]

R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. 2000

2000
[59]

Suppressed for Anonymity , author=
[60]

Newell and P

A. Newell and P. S. Rosenbloom. Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. 1981

1981
[61]

A. L. Samuel. Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 1959

1959