pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01411 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Quantum jump trajectories, hybrid systems, non-Hermitian evolutions, quantum/classical walks

Alberto Barchielli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 14:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords quantum jumpsstochastic master equationhybrid systemsnon-Hermitian evolutionquantum walkstypical trajectoriesexclusive probability densitiesopen quantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Typical trajectories recursively construct solutions to non-linear quantum jump master equations and unify hybrid evolutions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Quantum stochastic master equations of jump type are formulated in general and connected to quantum-classical hybrid systems and filtering theory. The notion of a typical trajectory allows the conditional state to be built recursively as the solution to the non-linear stochastic master equation. Exclusive probability densities give a full description of all jump-related probabilities, including waiting-time distributions. This single framework unifies and generalizes evolutions under non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, random quantum channels, quantum renewal processes, continuous-time open quantum walks, and Lindblad rate equations.

Core claim

By introducing the notion of typical trajectory, the solution of the non-linear stochastic master equation (the conditional state) can be constructed recursively. By the notion of exclusive probability densities all the probabilities related to the jumps, in particular the waiting times of the jumps and their probability distributions, can be described. This general formulation and the idea of hybrid system allow to unify and generalize different fields: evolutions under non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, unitary dynamics interspersed by quantum channels at random times, quantum renewal processes, continuous time open quantum walks, Lindblad rate equation.

What carries the argument

Typical trajectories that recursively construct the conditional state, together with exclusive probability densities for jump statistics, within the quantum-classical hybrid-system formulation of jump-type stochastic master equations.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid-system perspective together with the definitions of typical trajectories and exclusive densities apply without further restrictions to every listed evolution type while preserving their original physics.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation showing that the recursive construction along typical trajectories fails to recover the known conditional state for a standard non-Hermitian evolution, or that the exclusive densities do not reproduce the correct waiting-time distribution for jumps in a continuous-time open quantum walk.

read the original abstract

Quantum stochastic master equations of jump type are formulated in a general way and connections with quantum/classical hybrid systems and quantum filtering theory are discussed. By introducing the notion of ``typical trajectory", we show how to recursively construct the solution of the non-linear stochastic master equation (the conditional state). Moreover, by the notion of ``exclusive probability densities" we can describe all the probabilities related to the jumps, in particular, the waiting times of the jumps and their probability distributions. This general formulation and the idea of hybrid system allow to unify and generalize different fields: evolutions under non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, unitary dynamics interspersed by quantum channels at random times, quantum renewal processes, continuous time open quantum walks, Lindblad rate equation, ...

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates quantum stochastic master equations of jump type in a general way and discusses connections to quantum/classical hybrid systems and quantum filtering theory. It introduces the notion of 'typical trajectory' to recursively construct the solution of the non-linear stochastic master equation (the conditional state). It further defines 'exclusive probability densities' to describe all probabilities related to jumps, including waiting times and their distributions. This framework is presented as unifying and generalizing several areas: evolutions under non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, unitary dynamics interspersed by quantum channels at random times, quantum renewal processes, continuous-time open quantum walks, and Lindblad rate equations.

Significance. If the mappings are shown to preserve the original physics and recover known results exactly in each setting, the hybrid-system perspective together with the typical-trajectory recursion and exclusive densities could supply a useful unifying language for jump processes across open quantum systems and quantum walks. The recursive construction may offer a practical route to solving conditional-state dynamics, while the exclusive densities could simplify extraction of waiting-time statistics. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present, but the explicit focus on trajectory-level probabilities is a constructive strength if the unification holds.

major comments (2)
  1. [non-Hermitian evolutions section] The unification claim for non-Hermitian evolutions (abstract and the corresponding section) requires explicit verification that embedding into a hybrid system with explicit jump channels recovers the standard deterministic non-unitary evolution between post-selected jumps without extra terms in the generator or altered normalization; in particular, the waiting-time distribution must match exp(−∫γ(t)dt) for time-dependent rates.
  2. [continuous-time open quantum walks section] For continuous-time open quantum walks (abstract and the relevant section), the exclusive-probability-density construction must be shown to recover exactly the lattice structure, position-dependent rates, and known waiting-time laws without introducing modifications; otherwise the unification alters the original physics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that the constructions 'work and unify fields' but supplies no derivation outline, error analysis, or explicit checks against standard cases; adding a short illustrative example or pointer to a key equation would improve accessibility.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for 'typical trajectory' and 'exclusive probability densities' should be introduced with a clear table or glossary to ensure consistent use in the recursive construction and probability derivations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The major comments correctly identify the need for explicit verifications to substantiate the unification claims for non-Hermitian evolutions and continuous-time open quantum walks. We address each point below and will incorporate the requested derivations in the revised version to ensure the mappings preserve the original physics exactly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [non-Hermitian evolutions section] The unification claim for non-Hermitian evolutions (abstract and the corresponding section) requires explicit verification that embedding into a hybrid system with explicit jump channels recovers the standard deterministic non-unitary evolution between post-selected jumps without extra terms in the generator or altered normalization; in particular, the waiting-time distribution must match exp(−∫γ(t)dt) for time-dependent rates.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification strengthens the claim. In the non-Hermitian section the hybrid-system embedding is constructed by identifying the anti-Hermitian part with explicit jump channels; the typical-trajectory recursion then yields the non-Hermitian generator between jumps with no additional terms, and post-selection restores normalization. The exclusive probability density for the no-jump event directly produces the waiting-time distribution exp(−∫γ(t)dt) for time-dependent rates. To make this fully transparent we will add a dedicated derivation subsection comparing the embedded generator and waiting-time law to the standard non-Hermitian Schrödinger evolution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [continuous-time open quantum walks section] For continuous-time open quantum walks (abstract and the relevant section), the exclusive-probability-density construction must be shown to recover exactly the lattice structure, position-dependent rates, and known waiting-time laws without introducing modifications; otherwise the unification alters the original physics.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee’s concern. The exclusive probability densities are defined from the general jump master equation so that, when specialized to a lattice with position-dependent rates, they reproduce the standard continuous-time open quantum walk generator and the associated waiting-time statistics without modification. We will insert an explicit reduction showing that the lattice structure, position-dependent jump rates, and known waiting-time laws (including exponential and renewal-type distributions) are recovered exactly, with a side-by-side comparison to the literature formulations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

New notions of typical trajectories and exclusive densities introduced to solve the non-linear SME and unify hybrid-system descriptions without reducing to self-definition or fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper defines 'typical trajectory' explicitly as a tool to recursively construct the conditional state solution of the non-linear stochastic master equation, and 'exclusive probability densities' as a means to compute all jump-related probabilities including waiting-time distributions. These are presented as original constructs within the hybrid-system and quantum-filtering framework, applied to standard jump-type master equations. No equations or claims show the target quantities (conditional states or jump statistics) being used to define the inputs, nor are any 'predictions' obtained by fitting a subset of data and renaming the fit. Self-citations to prior quantum-trajectory work are present but function as background rather than load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes that close a circular chain. The unification across non-Hermitian evolutions, quantum walks, and renewal processes proceeds by embedding known generators into the hybrid perspective, preserving their original forms rather than deriving them tautologically from the new notions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard quantum stochastic calculus and filtering theory plus two newly introduced notions whose independence from prior literature is not shown in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum stochastic master equations of jump type can be formulated in a general way that encompasses the listed models.
    Stated in the abstract as the starting point for the unification.
invented entities (2)
  • typical trajectory no independent evidence
    purpose: Recursive construction of the conditional state from the nonlinear stochastic master equation
    Introduced in the abstract as the key device for solving the equation.
  • exclusive probability densities no independent evidence
    purpose: Description of all jump-related probabilities including waiting times
    Introduced in the abstract to handle jump statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5420 in / 1350 out tokens · 29712 ms · 2026-05-09T14:41:34.822388+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Barchielli,Measurement theory and stochastic differential equations in quantum mechanics, Phys

    A. Barchielli,Measurement theory and stochastic differential equations in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A34(1986) 1642–1649

    1986

  2. [2]

    Belavkin,Nondemolition measurements, nonlinear filtering and dynamic programming of quantum stochastic processes

    V .P. Belavkin,Nondemolition measurements, nonlinear filtering and dynamic programming of quantum stochastic processes. In A. Blaqui`ere (ed.),Modelling and Control of Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 121 (Springer, Berlin, 1988) pp. 245–265

    1988

  3. [3]

    Belavkin,A new wave equation for a continuous nondemolition measurement, Phys

    V .P. Belavkin,A new wave equation for a continuous nondemolition measurement, Phys. Lett. A140 (1989) 355-358

    1989

  4. [4]

    Barchielli, V .P

    A. Barchielli, V .P. Belavkin,Measurements continuous in time and a posteriori states in quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.24(1991) 1495–1514

    1991

  5. [5]

    Barchielli,On the quantum theory of measurements continuous in time, Rep

    A. Barchielli,On the quantum theory of measurements continuous in time, Rep. Math. Phys.33 (1993) 21–34. 44

    1993

  6. [6]

    Carmichael,An Open System Approach to Quantum Optics, Lect

    H. Carmichael,An Open System Approach to Quantum Optics, Lect. Notes in Physicsm 81(Springer, Berlin, 1993)

    1993

  7. [7]

    Barchielli, A

    A. Barchielli, A. M. Paganoni,Detection theory in quantum optics: Stochastic representation, Quantum Semiclass. Opt.8(1996) 133–156

    1996

  8. [8]

    Zoller and C.W

    P. Zoller and C.W. Gardiner,Quantum noise in quantum optics: the stochastic Schr ¨odinger equation. In S. Reynaud, E. Giacobino & J. Zinn-Justin eds.,Fluctuations quantiques, (Les Houches 1995) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1997) pp. 79–136

    1995

  9. [9]

    Holevo,Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics m 67 (Springer, Berlin, 2001)

    A.S. Holevo,Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics m 67 (Springer, Berlin, 2001)

    2001

  10. [10]

    K ¨ummerer and H

    B. K ¨ummerer and H. Maassen,An ergodic theorem for quantum counting processes, J. Phys. A 36 (2003) 2155

    2003

  11. [11]

    Barchielli,Continual Measurements in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Stochastic Calculus

    A. Barchielli,Continual Measurements in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Stochastic Calculus. In S. Attal, A. Joye, C.-A. Pillet (eds.),Open Quantum Systems III, Lect. Notes Math.1882(Springer, Berlin, 2006), pp. 207–291

    2006

  12. [12]

    Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 — Non-Classical Fields, (Springer, Berlin 2008)

    H. Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 — Non-Classical Fields, (Springer, Berlin 2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    Barchielli, M

    A. Barchielli, M. Gregoratti,Quantum Trajectories and Measurements in Continuous Time: The Diffusive Case, Lect. Notes Phys.782(Springer, Berlin & Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  14. [14]

    Wiseman and G.J

    H.M. Wiseman and G.J. Milburn,Quantum Measurement and Control(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    2010

  15. [15]

    Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and its Applications(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    K. Jacobs,Quantum Measurement Theory and its Applications(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Gross, C.M

    J.A. Gross, C.M. Caves, G.J. Milburn, J. Combes,Qubit models of weak continuous measurements: Markovian conditional and open-system dynamics, Quantum Sci. Technol.3(2018) 024005

    2018

  17. [17]

    Jackson, C.M

    C.S. Jackson, C.M. Caves,Simultaneous measurements of noncommuting observables: Positive transformations and instrumental Lie groups, Entropy25(2023) 1254

    2023

  18. [18]

    Maassen,Continuous observation of quantum systems, Int

    H. Maassen,Continuous observation of quantum systems, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 22 (2024) 2440011. Also in B.-G. Englert and R. Werner (eds.),Communicating the Quantum Way — Contributions in Honor of Alexander S Holevo’s 80th Birthday(World Scientific, 2025), pp. 261–299

    2024

  19. [19]

    Landi, M.J

    G.T. Landi, M.J. Kewming, M.T. Mitchison, P.P. Potts,Current fluctuations in open quantum sys- tems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics, PRX QUANTUM5(2024) 020201

    2024

  20. [20]

    Jackson,Sequential quantum measurements and the instrumental group algebra, Quantum Rep

    C.S. Jackson,Sequential quantum measurements and the instrumental group algebra, Quantum Rep. 7(2025) 57

    2025

  21. [21]

    Di ´osi, N

    L. Di ´osi, N. Gisin, W.T. Strunz,Quantum approach to coupling classical and quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A61(2000) 022108

    2000

  22. [22]

    Di ´osi,Hybrid quantum-classical master equations, Phys

    L. Di ´osi,Hybrid quantum-classical master equations, Phys. Scr.T163(2014) 014004. 45

    2014

  23. [23]

    Di ´osi,Hybrid completely positive Markovian quantum-classical dynamics, Phys

    L. Di ´osi,Hybrid completely positive Markovian quantum-classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. A107 (2023) 062206;Erratum, Phys. Rev. A108(2023) 059902(E)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Manfredi, A

    G. Manfredi, A. Rittaud, C. Tronci,Hybrid quantum-classical dynamics of pure-dephasing systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56(2023) 154002

    2023

  25. [25]

    Alonso, C

    J.L. Alonso, C. Bouthelier-Madre, J. Clemente-Gallardo, D. Mart ´ınez-Crespo, J. Pomar,Effective nonlinear Ehrenfest hybrid quantum-classical dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) 649

    2023

  26. [26]

    Sergi, D

    A. Sergi, D. Lamberto, A. Migliore, A. Messina,Quantum–classical hybrid systems and Ehrenfest’s Theorem, Entropy25(2023) 602

    2023

  27. [27]

    Oppenheim, C

    J. Oppenheim, C. Sparaciari, B. ˇSoda, Z. Weller-Davies,Objective trajectories in hybrid classical- quantum dynamics, Quantum7(2023) 891

    2023

  28. [28]

    Dammeier, R.F

    L. Dammeier, R.F. Werner,Quantum-classical hybrid systems and their quasifree transformations, Quantum7(2023) 1068

    2023

  29. [29]

    Barchielli,Markovian master equations for quantum-classical hybrid systems, Phys

    A. Barchielli,Markovian master equations for quantum-classical hybrid systems, Phys. Lett. A492 (2023) 129230

    2023

  30. [30]

    Layton, J

    I. Layton, J. Oppenheim, Z. Weller-Davies,A healthier semi-classical dynamics, Quantum 8 (2024) 1565

    2024

  31. [31]

    Barchielli, R

    A. Barchielli, R. Werner,Hybrid quantum-classical systems: Quasi-free Markovian dynamics, Int. J. Quantum Inf.22(2024) 2440002. Also in B.-G. Englert and R. Werner (eds.),Communicating the Quantum Way — Contributions in Honor of Alexander S Holevo’s 80th Birthday(World Scientific, 2025), pp. 211-259

    2024

  32. [32]

    Barchielli,Markovian dynamics for a quantum/classical system and quantum trajectories, J

    A. Barchielli,Markovian dynamics for a quantum/classical system and quantum trajectories, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57(2024) 315301

    2024

  33. [33]

    Ticozzi, K

    F. Ticozzi, K. Nishio, C. Altafini,Stabilization of stochastic quantum dynamics via open- and closed- loop control, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control58(2013) 74–85

    2013

  34. [34]

    Barchielli, M

    A. Barchielli, M. Gregoratti,Quantum measurements in continuous time, non-Markovian evolutions and feedback, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A370no. 1979 (2012) 5364–5385

    1979

  35. [35]

    Gough,A quantum Kalman filter-based PID controller, Open Systems and Information Dynamics 27(2020) 2050014

    J.E. Gough,A quantum Kalman filter-based PID controller, Open Systems and Information Dynamics 27(2020) 2050014

    2020

  36. [36]

    Tilloy,General quantum-classical dynamics as measurement based feedback, SciPost Phys.17 (2024) 083

    A. Tilloy,General quantum-classical dynamics as measurement based feedback, SciPost Phys.17 (2024) 083

    2024

  37. [37]

    Altafini, F

    C. Altafini, F. Ticozzi,Modeling and control of quantum systems: An introduction, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control57(2012) 1898–1917

    2012

  38. [38]

    Annby-Andersson, F

    B. Annby-Andersson, F. Bakhshinezhad, D. Bhattacharyya, G. De Sousa, C. Jarzynski, P. Samuels- son, P.P. Potts,Quantum Fokker-Planck Master Equation for Continuous Feedback Control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 050401

    2022

  39. [39]

    Albarelli, M.G

    F. Albarelli, M.G. Genoni,A pedagogical introduction to continuously monitored quantum systems and measurement-based feedback, Phys. Lett. A494(2024) 129260. 46

    2024

  40. [40]

    Rosal, G

    A.J.B. Rosal, G. Fiusa, P.P. Potts, G.T. Landi,Deterministic equations for feedback control of open quantum systems III: Full counting statistics for jump-based feedback, arXiv:2512.11078 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Davies,Quantum stochastic processes, Commun

    E.B. Davies,Quantum stochastic processes, Commun. Math. Phys.15(1969) 277–304

    1969

  42. [42]

    Davies,Quantum Theory of Open Systems(Academic, London, 1976)

    E.B. Davies,Quantum Theory of Open Systems(Academic, London, 1976)

    1976

  43. [43]

    Srinivas, E.B

    M.D. Srinivas, E.B. Davies,Photon counting probabilities in quantum opticsOpt. Acta28(1981) 981-996

    1981

  44. [44]

    Srinivas, E.B

    M.D. Srinivas, E.B. Davies,What are the photon counting probabilities for open systems — A reply to Mandel’s comments, Opt. Acta29(1982) 235-238

    1982

  45. [45]

    Barchielli,Direct and heterodyne detection and other applications of quantum stochastic calculus to quantum optics, Quantum Opt.2(1990) 423–441

    A. Barchielli,Direct and heterodyne detection and other applications of quantum stochastic calculus to quantum optics, Quantum Opt.2(1990) 423–441

    1990

  46. [46]

    Barchielli,On the quantum theory of direct detection

    A. Barchielli,On the quantum theory of direct detection. In O. Hirota, A.S. Holevo, C.M. Caves (eds.),Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement(Plenum Press, New York, 1997) pp. 243–252

    1997

  47. [47]

    D. Keys, J. Wehr,Poisson stochastic master equation unravelings and the measurement problem: A quantum stochastic calculus perspective, J. Math. Phys.61(2020) 032101;Erratum, J. Math. Phys. 63(2022) 109901

    2020

  48. [48]

    Donvil, P

    B. Donvil, P. Muratore-Ginanneschi,Quantum trajectory framework for general time-local master equations, Nature Commun.13(2022) 4140

    2022

  49. [49]

    Settimo, K

    F. Settimo, K. Luoma, D. Chru ´sci´nski, B. Vacchini, A. Smirne, J. Piilo,Generalized-rate-operator quantum jumps via realization-dependent transformations, Phys. Rev. A109(2024) 062201

    2024

  50. [50]

    Chru ´sci´nski, K

    D. Chru ´sci´nski, K. Luoma, J. Piilo, A. Smirne,How to design quantum-jump trajectories via distinct master equation representations, Quantum6(2022) 835

    2022

  51. [51]

    Mølmer, Y

    K. Mølmer, Y . Castin, J. Dalibard,A Monte Carlo wave function method in quantum optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B10(1993) 524–538

    1993

  52. [52]

    Radaelli, G.T

    M. Radaelli, G.T. Landi, F.C. Binder,Gillespie algorithm for quantum jump trajectories, Phys. Rev. A110(2024) 062212

    2024

  53. [53]

    Daley, D

    D.J. Daley, D. Vere-Jones,An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes — Volume II: General Theory and Structure, (Springer, 2008)

    2008

  54. [54]

    Lloyd, L

    S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, L. Martellini, S. Roncallo,Quantum stroboscopy for time measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2026); arXiv:2507.17740 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    S. Roy, S. Gupta, G. Morigi,Causality, localisation, and universality of monitored quantum walks with long-range hopping, Phys. Rev. E112(2025) 044146

    2025

  56. [56]

    Heine, E

    T. Heine, E. Barkai, K. Ziegler, S. Tornow,Quantum walks: First hitting times with weak measure- ments, arXiv:2506.21168 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Sergi, K.G

    A. Sergi, K.G. Zloshchastiev,Non-Hermitian quantum dynamics of a two-level system and models of dissipative environments, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B27(2013) 1350163. 47

    2013

  58. [58]

    T. Gao, E. Estrecho, K.Y . Bliokh, T.C.H. Liew, M.D. Fraser, S. Brodbeck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. H ¨ofling, Y . Yamamoto, F. Nori, Y .S. Kivshar, A.G. Truscott, R.G. Dall, E.A. Ostrovskaya,Ob- servation of non-Hermitian degeneracies in a chaotic exciton-polariton billiard, Nature526(2015) 554–558

    2015

  59. [59]

    Croke,PT-symmetric Hamiltonians and their application in quantum information, Phys

    S. Croke,PT-symmetric Hamiltonians and their application in quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 91(2015) 052113

    2015

  60. [60]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R.W. Chhajlany, F. Nori,Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. A100(2019) 062131

    2019

  61. [61]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi1, Y .N. Joglekar, K.W. Murch,Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Phys.15(2019) 1232–1236

    2019

  62. [62]

    Ashida, Z

    Y . Ashida, Z. Gong, M. Ueda,Non-Hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69(2020) 249–435

    2020

  63. [63]

    Dubey, C

    V . Dubey, C. Bernardin, A. Dhar,Quantum dynamics under continuous projective measurements: Non-Hermitian description and the continuum-space limit, Phys. Rev. A103(2021) 032221

    2021

  64. [64]

    Nongthombam, A.K

    R. Nongthombam, A.K. Sarma,Homodyne measurement of a non-Hermitian qubit undergoing fluor- escence, arXiv:2510.13345 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Nongthombam, A

    R. Nongthombam, A. Verma, A.K. Sarma,Role of inefficient measurement in realizing post- selection-based non-Hermitian qubits, arXiv:2510.21159 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Longhi,Phase transitions and virtual exceptional points in quantum emitters coupled to dissipative baths, J

    S. Longhi,Phase transitions and virtual exceptional points in quantum emitters coupled to dissipative baths, J. Appl. Phys.138(2025) 184401

    2025

  67. [67]

    K. Ho, S. Perna, S. Wittrock, Nhat-Tan Phan, S. Tsunegi, H. Kubota, S. Yuasa, P. Bortolotti, M. d’Aquino, C. Serpico, V . Cros, R. Lebrun,Encirclement of an exceptional point and eigenvalue switch in non-Hermitian coupled spintronic nano-oscillators, Newton2(2026) 100333

    2026

  68. [68]

    Phys.484(2026) 170298

    Duttatreya, Ipsika Mohanty, Sanjib Dey,Improved coherence time of a non-Hermitian qubit in a PT-symmetric environment, Ann. Phys.484(2026) 170298

    2026

  69. [69]

    Goychuk, P

    I. Goychuk, P. H ¨anggi,Quantum two-state dynamics driven by stationary non-Markovian discrete noise: Exact results, Chemical Physics324(2006) 160-171

    2006

  70. [70]

    Schomerus, E

    H. Schomerus, E. Lutz,Nonexponential decoherence and momentum subdiffusion in a quantum L´evy kicked rotator, PRL98(2007) 260401

    2007

  71. [71]

    D. Das, S. Dattagupta, S. Gupta,Quantum unitary evolution interspersed with repeated non-unitary interactions at random times: the method of stochastic Liouville equation, and two examples of interactions in the context of a tight-binding chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 053101

    2022

  72. [72]

    Nagar, S

    A. Nagar, S. Gupta,Stochastic resetting in interacting particle systems: a review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 (2023) 283001

    2023

  73. [73]

    Budini,Stochastic representation of a class of non-Markovian completely positive evolutions, Phys

    A.A. Budini,Stochastic representation of a class of non-Markovian completely positive evolutions, Phys. Rev. A69(2004) 042107

    2004

  74. [74]

    Vacchini, A

    B. Vacchini, A. Smirne, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, H.-P. Breuer,Markovianity and non-Markovianity in quantum and classical systems, New J. Phys.13(2011) 093004. 48

    2011

  75. [75]

    Vacchini,Non-Markovian master equations from piecewise dynamics, Phys

    B. Vacchini,Non-Markovian master equations from piecewise dynamics, Phys. Rev. A87(2013) 030101(R)

    2013

  76. [76]

    Vacchini,Quantum renewal processes, Scientific Reports10(2020) 5592

    B. Vacchini,Quantum renewal processes, Scientific Reports10(2020) 5592

    2020

  77. [77]

    Megier, M

    N. Megier, M. Ponzi, A. Smirne, B. Vacchini,Memory effects in quantum dynamics modelled by quantum renewal processes, Entropy23(2021) 905

    2021

  78. [78]

    Budini,Lindblad rate equations, Phys

    A.A. Budini,Lindblad rate equations, Phys. Rev. A74(2006) 053815

    2006

  79. [79]

    Breuer, J

    H.-P. Breuer, J. Gemmer, M. Michel,Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: Correlated projection su- peroperators and Hilbert space averaging, Phys. Rev. E73(2006) 016139

    2006

  80. [80]

    Breuer,Non-Markovian generalization of the Lindblad theory of open quantum system, Phys

    H.-P. Breuer,Non-Markovian generalization of the Lindblad theory of open quantum system, Phys. Rev. A75(2007) 022103

    2007

Showing first 80 references.