pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03298 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 🪐 quant-ph

Molecular Attoscope: Pulse Shape Spectroscopy of Electronic Coherence

Loc Thi-Hoang Ngo , Julia Codere , Javin Ohara , Brian Kaufman , Martin G Cohen , Tamas Rozgonyi , Philipp Marquetand , Matthew Bain
show 3 more authors
Brett J Pearson Ruaridh Forbes Thomas Weinacht
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords molecular attoscopeelectronic coherenceattosecond spectroscopypulse shapingbenzenenuclear dynamicsdeep ultravioletholographic measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shaped deep-ultraviolet pulses enable direct measurement of both 856-attosecond electronic motion and 36-femtosecond nuclear motion in neutral benzene.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates a molecular attoscope that uses shaped laser pulses in the deep ultraviolet to coherently probe the dynamics of electrons and nuclei in an entangled wave packet in neutral benzene. The method simultaneously tracks an electronic period of 856 attoseconds and a nuclear period of 36 femtoseconds while showing that electronic coherence persists over hundreds of optical cycles and is modulated by the nuclear motion. A reader would care because prior attosecond work was largely confined to ions, where nuclear effects could be set aside, whereas photochemical processes in neutral molecules involve both degrees of freedom evolving together. The result supplies a concrete route to observing the coupled electronic-nuclear wave function as it evolves in real time.

Core claim

The authors establish that shaped deep-ultraviolet laser pulses perform a coherent holographic measurement on the entangled electronic-nuclear wave packet created in neutral benzene. This measurement directly reveals an 856-attosecond electronic period and a 36-femtosecond nuclear period, with electronic coherence lasting for hundreds of optical cycles while being modulated by the slower nuclear dynamics. The approach is presented as general and capable of visualizing the real-time evolution of the coupled wave function.

What carries the argument

The molecular attoscope, a pulse-shape spectroscopy technique that uses shaped deep-ultraviolet pulses to extract the intrinsic periods of an entangled wave packet through holographic reconstruction.

If this is right

  • Attosecond techniques can now be applied to neutral molecules where nuclear motion must be included.
  • Electronic coherence in a neutral molecule can survive hundreds of optical cycles even while nuclear motion continuously modulates it.
  • The nuclear period directly influences the observed electronic coherence, linking the two timescales.
  • The holographic method supplies a route to real-time visualization of the full coupled electronic-nuclear wave function.
  • Because the technique is described as general, it can be transferred to other neutral molecules for similar coupled-dynamics measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coherence persistence is reproducible, the same pulse-shaping strategy could be used to time interventions that steer photochemical outcomes before decoherence sets in.
  • Extension to larger or more complex molecules would test whether the observed hundreds-of-cycle coherence is special to benzene or a broader feature of neutral systems.
  • The ability to separate electronic and nuclear contributions in one measurement opens the possibility of designing pulse sequences that selectively address one while leaving the other largely unperturbed.

Load-bearing premise

The shaped pulses provide a non-perturbative probe whose signals map directly onto the claimed electronic and nuclear periods without distortion introduced by the measurement itself or by post-processing choices.

What would settle it

Repeating the experiment with deliberately varied pulse shapes and obtaining inconsistent extracted periods for the electronic motion, or finding no clear modulation of coherence by the nuclear period, would show that the mapping from observed signals to intrinsic dynamics does not hold.

read the original abstract

Tracking the coupled motion of electrons and nuclei on their intrinsic timescales is essential to understanding and controlling photochemical transformations. While attosecond techniques have provided unprecedented insight into electronic dynamics, they have largely been restricted to ionic systems, with nuclear motion often neglected or indirectly inferred. Here, we demonstrate a ``molecular attoscope", which uses shaped laser pulses in the deep ultraviolet to perform a coherent measurement of electronic and nuclear dynamics in an entangled wave packet in neutral benzene. This enables us to trace both the 856-attosecond-period electronic motion and the 36-femtosecond-period nuclear motion. We observe electronic coherence persisting over hundreds of optical cycles, modulated by nuclear dynamics. Our holographic approach is general, and lays the groundwork for coherent measurements capable of visualizing the evolution of the coupled electronic-nuclear wave function in real time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate a 'molecular attoscope' that uses shaped deep-ultraviolet laser pulses to perform a coherent, holographic measurement of an entangled electronic-nuclear wave packet in neutral benzene. This is said to enable direct tracing of 856-attosecond-period electronic motion and 36-femtosecond-period nuclear motion, with electronic coherence persisting over hundreds of optical cycles while being modulated by nuclear dynamics. The approach is presented as generalizable for real-time visualization of coupled electron-nuclear evolution in photochemical systems.

Significance. If the measurements are shown to faithfully reflect intrinsic free evolution without significant probe-induced distortion, the result would be significant for extending attosecond techniques beyond ionic systems to neutral molecules, providing a new route to observe entangled dynamics on their natural timescales. The holographic pulse-shaping method could offer advantages in generality over existing attosecond probes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results: The central claim that the observed 856-as and 36-fs periods directly map to the intrinsic electronic and nuclear motion requires explicit demonstration that the shaped DUV probe interaction remains in a linear regime. No power-dependence study, comparison to perturbative calculations, or deconvolution of the known pulse envelope from the reconstructed signal is referenced, leaving open the possibility that intensity-dependent phase accumulation or envelope-locked modulation contributes to the reported oscillations.
  2. [Methods] Methods or data analysis section: The holographic inversion procedure used to extract the periods and coherence lifetimes is not described with sufficient detail (e.g., no equation for the reconstruction kernel or handling of the system's nonlinear response function). Without this, it is impossible to assess whether the reported persistence over hundreds of optical cycles is robust or an artifact of the specific post-processing assumptions.
  3. [Results] Results: No error bars, statistical significance tests, or raw vs. processed data comparisons are provided to support that the extracted periods are not dominated by the temporal structure of the shaped pulses. This is load-bearing because the skeptic concern (nonlinear response or reconstruction bias) cannot be ruled out from the presented information.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses the term 'holographic approach' without a brief definition or reference to prior holographic attosecond methods; a short clarification would improve accessibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (if present) should explicitly state the number of experimental runs or averaging procedure used to generate the time traces from which periods are extracted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting important points that will strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications and supporting analyses in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results: The central claim that the observed 856-as and 36-fs periods directly map to the intrinsic electronic and nuclear motion requires explicit demonstration that the shaped DUV probe interaction remains in a linear regime. No power-dependence study, comparison to perturbative calculations, or deconvolution of the known pulse envelope from the reconstructed signal is referenced, leaving open the possibility that intensity-dependent phase accumulation or envelope-locked modulation contributes to the reported oscillations.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the linear regime is necessary to substantiate the mapping to intrinsic dynamics. Although the experiments were performed at intensities chosen to remain well below the nonlinear threshold, the original manuscript did not include the supporting measurements. In the revision we will add a power-dependence study showing that the extracted periods and coherence lifetimes are independent of intensity over the relevant range, together with a comparison to perturbative calculations and an explicit deconvolution of the known pulse envelope from the reconstructed signal. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods or data analysis section: The holographic inversion procedure used to extract the periods and coherence lifetimes is not described with sufficient detail (e.g., no equation for the reconstruction kernel or handling of the system's nonlinear response function). Without this, it is impossible to assess whether the reported persistence over hundreds of optical cycles is robust or an artifact of the specific post-processing assumptions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the methods section provided insufficient mathematical detail for independent assessment. The holographic reconstruction employs a Fourier-domain kernel derived from the measured pulse-shaping transfer function. In the revised manuscript we will supply the explicit reconstruction kernel equation, describe the assumptions made about the system's linear response function, and outline the checks performed to confirm that the reported coherence lifetimes are not sensitive to the post-processing choices. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results: No error bars, statistical significance tests, or raw vs. processed data comparisons are provided to support that the extracted periods are not dominated by the temporal structure of the shaped pulses. This is load-bearing because the skeptic concern (nonlinear response or reconstruction bias) cannot be ruled out from the presented information.

    Authors: We recognize the importance of quantitative error analysis and direct comparison with raw data. The revised manuscript will include error bars on all reported periods and coherence times, obtained from repeated experimental runs, together with the results of statistical significance tests (Fourier-peak confidence intervals and goodness-of-fit metrics). Supplementary figures will show raw versus processed traces to demonstrate that the 856-as and 36-fs oscillations are not imposed by the pulse envelope or reconstruction procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental demonstration with no derivation chain or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper is framed as an experimental demonstration of a molecular attoscope using shaped DUV pulses to observe electronic (856 as) and nuclear (36 fs) periods in benzene wave packets. No mathematical derivation, first-principles calculation, parameter fitting, or predictive model is presented that could reduce to its own inputs. The central claims rest on direct measurement and holographic reconstruction of observed signals, with no self-definitional equations, self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks via physical experiment rather than tautological modeling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the claim rests on the experimental mapping of pulse interactions to wave-packet dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5468 in / 1102 out tokens · 72240 ms · 2026-05-07T17:35:46.277912+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S., Chabera, P., Uhlig, J., Persson, P

    Ponseca Jr, C. S., Chabera, P., Uhlig, J., Persson, P. & Sundstrom, V. Ultrafast electron dynamics in solar energy conversion.Chem. Rev.117, 10940–11024 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    J.et al.Charge migration and charge transfer in molecular systems

    W¨ orner, H. J.et al.Charge migration and charge transfer in molecular systems. Struct. Dynam.4, 061508 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    D., Fleming, G

    Scholes, G. D., Fleming, G. R., Olaya-Castro, A. & van Grondelle, R. Lessons from nature about solar light harvesting.Nat. Chem.3, 763–774 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    T., Shank, C

    Yeh, A. T., Shank, C. V. & McCusker, J. K. Ultrafast electron localization dynamics following photo-induced charge transfer.Science289, 935–938 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    E., Saer, R

    Maiuri, M., Ostroumov, E. E., Saer, R. G., Blankenship, R. E. & Scholes, G. D. Coherent wavepackets in the fenna–matthews–olson complex are robust to excitonic-structure perturbations caused by mutagenesis.Nat. Chem.10, 177–183 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Zewail, A. H. Femtochemistry: Atomic-scale dynamics of the chemical bond.J. Phys. Chem. A104, 5660–5694 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Z., Seideman, T

    Blanchet, V., Zgierski, M. Z., Seideman, T. & Stolow, A. Discerning vibronic molecular dynamics using time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.Nature401, 52–54 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Geßner, O.et al.Femtosecond multidimensional imaging of a molecular dissociation.Science311, 219–222 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Nugent-Glandorf, L.et al.Ultrafast time-resolved soft x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of dissociating br 2.Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 193002 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Dantus, M., Bowman, R. M. & Zewail, A. H. Femtosecond laser observations of molecular vibration and rotation.Nature343, 737–739 (1990)

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    & Mart´ ın, F

    Palacios, A. & Mart´ ın, F. The quantum chemistry of attosecond molecular science.WIRes. Comput. Mol. Sci.10, e1430 (2020). 12

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    L´ epine, F., Ivanov, M. Y. & Vrakking, M. J. Attosecond molecular dynamics: fact or fiction?Nat. Photonics8, 195–204 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Corkum, P. B. & Krausz, F. Attosecond science.Nat. Phys.3, 381–387 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Goulielmakis, E.et al.Real-time observation of valence electron motion.Nature 466, 739–743 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Calegari, F.et al.Ultrafast electron dynamics in phenylalanine initiated by attosecond pulses.Science346, 336–339 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    & Mart´ ın, F

    Nisoli, M., Decleva, P., Calegari, F., Palacios, A. & Mart´ ın, F. Attosecond electron dynamics in molecules.Chem. Rev.117, 10760–10825 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Adv.1, e1500356 (2015)

    Okino, T.et al.Direct observation of an attosecond electron wave packet in a nitrogen molecule.Sci. Adv.1, e1500356 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    T., Despr´ e, V., Golubev, N

    Matselyukh, D. T., Despr´ e, V., Golubev, N. V., Kuleff, A. I. & W¨ orner, H. J. Decoherence and revival in attosecond charge migration driven by non-adiabatic dynamics.Nat. Phys.18, 1206–1213 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Kowalewski, M., Bennett, K., Dorfman, K. E. & Mukamel, S. Catching conical intersections in the act: Monitoring transient electronic coherences by attosecond stimulated x-ray raman signals.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 193003 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    J., Robb, M

    Vacher, M., Bearpark, M. J., Robb, M. A. & Malhado, J. P. Electron dynamics upon ionization of polyatomic molecules: Coupling to quantum nuclear motion and decoherence.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 083001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Despr´ e, V., Golubev, N. V. & Kuleff, A. I. Charge migration in propiolic acid: A full quantum dynamical study.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 203002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    S.et al.Molecular modes of attosecond charge migration.Phys

    Folorunso, A. S.et al.Molecular modes of attosecond charge migration.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 133002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    M.et al.Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ionized iodoacetylene.Science350, 790–795 (2015)

    Kraus, P. M.et al.Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ionized iodoacetylene.Science350, 790–795 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Adv.8, eabn6848 (2022)

    Schwickert, D.et al.Electronic quantum coherence in glycine molecules probed with ultrashort x-ray pulses in real time.Sci. Adv.8, eabn6848 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Photonics18, 691–697 (2024)

    Guo, Z.et al.Experimental demonstration of attosecond pump–probe spec- troscopy with an x-ray free-electron laser.Nat. Photonics18, 691–697 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Adv.10, eadk9605 (2024)

    Kretschmar, M.et al.Compact realization of all-attosecond pump-probe spectroscopy.Sci. Adv.10, eadk9605 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Phys.4, 565–570 (2008)

    Eckle, P.et al.Attosecond angular streaking.Nat. Phys.4, 565–570 (2008). 13

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Belshaw, L.et al.Observation of ultrafast charge migration in an amino acid.J. Phys. Chem. Lett.3, 3751–3754 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    & Fielding, H

    Parker, D., Minns, R., Penfold, T., Worth, G. & Fielding, H. Ultrafast dynamics of the S1 excited state of benzene.Chem. Phys. Lett.469, 43–47 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    & Weinacht, T

    Kaufman, B., Marquetand, P., Rozgonyi, T. & Weinacht, T. Long-lived electronic coherences in molecular wave packets probed with pulse-shape spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A110, 033118 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    & Weinacht, T

    Kaufman, B., Marquetand, P., Rozgonyi, T. & Weinacht, T. Long-lived electronic coherences in molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 263202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    & Ben-Itzhak, I

    Mo˘ gol, G., Kaufman, B., Weinacht, T., Cheng, C. & Ben-Itzhak, I. Direct obser- vation of entangled electronic-nuclear wave packets.Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022047 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    & Mart´ ın, F

    Palacios, A., Gonz´ alez-Castrillo, A. & Mart´ ın, F. Molecular interferometer to decode attosecond electron–nuclear dynamics.PNAS111, 3973–3978 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    & Palacios, A

    Gonz´ alez-Castrillo, A., Mart´ ın, F. & Palacios, A. Quantum state holography to reconstruct the molecular wave packet using an attosecond XUV–XUV pump- probe technique.Sci. Rep.10, 12981 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    & Vrakking, M

    Koll, L.-M., Maikowski, L., Drescher, L., Witting, T. & Vrakking, M. J. J. Experimental control of quantum-mechanical entanglement in an attosecond pump-probe experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 043201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Vrakking, M. J. J. Control of attosecond entanglement and coherence.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 113203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Koll, L.-M., Maikowski, L., Drescher, L., Vrakking, M. J. J. & Witting, T. Phase- locking of time-delayed attosecond XUV pulse pairs.Opt. Express30, 7082–7095 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    & Girard, B

    Blanchet, V., Nicole, C., Bouchene, M.-A. & Girard, B. Temporal coherent control in two-photon transitions: from optical interferences to quantum interferences. Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2716 (1997)

    work page 1997

  39. [39]

    Feist, J.et al.Attosecond two-photon interferometry for doubly excited states of helium.Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 093005 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    & Metiu, H

    Engel, V. & Metiu, H. Two-photon wave-packet interferometry.J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5448–5458 (1994)

    work page 1994

  41. [41]

    Blanchet, V., Bouch` ene, M. A. & Girard, B. Temporal coherent control in the photoionization of Cs 2: Theory and experiment.J. Chem. Phys.108, 4862–4876 (1998). 14

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Ohmori, K.et al.Real-time observation of phase-controlled molecular wave- packet interference.Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 093002 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    & Schulz, C

    Mudrich, M., Stienkemeier, F., Droppelmann, G., Claas, P. & Schulz, C. Quan- tum interference spectroscopy of rubidium-helium exciplexes formed on helium nanodroplets.Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 023401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Morrigan, L.et al.Ultrafast molecular frame quantum tomography.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 193001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Commun.13, 2741 (2022)

    Baumg¨ artner, K.et al.Ultrafast orbital tomography of a pentacene film using time-resolved momentum microscopy at a FEL.Nat. Commun.13, 2741 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    & Huang, K.Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices(Oxford University Press, 1996)

    Born, M. & Huang, K.Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices(Oxford University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  47. [47]

    Stolow, A., Bragg, A. E. & Neumark, D. M. Femtosecond time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.Chem. Rev.104, 1719–1758 (2004)

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    & Gerber, G

    Baumert, T., Grosser, M., Thalweiser, R. & Gerber, G. Femtosecond time- resolved molecular multiphoton ionization: The Na2 system.Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 3753–3756 (1991)

    work page 1991

  49. [49]

    & Zanni, M

    Shim, S.-H. & Zanni, M. T. How to turn your pump–probe instrument into a multidimensional spectrometer: 2d IR and Vis spectroscopies via pulse shaping. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.11, 748–761 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    & Warren, W

    Tian, P., Keusters, D., Suzaki, Y. & Warren, W. S. Femtosecond phase-coherent two-dimensional spectroscopy.Science300, 1553–1555 (2003)

    work page 2003

  51. [51]

    Pearson, B. J. & Weinacht, T. C. Shaped ultrafast laser pulses in the deep ultraviolet.Opt. Express15, 4385–4388 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Contin.3, 785–794 (2024)

    Codere, J.et al.High repetition-rate pulse shaping of a spectrally broadened Yb femtosecond laser.Opt. Contin.3, 785–794 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Catanese, A.et al.Acousto-optic modulator pulse-shaper compression of octave- spanning pulses from a stretched hollow-core fiber.OSA Contin.4, 3176–3183 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Codere, J.et al.Spectral broadening and pulse shaping in the deep ultraviolet. Opt. Lett.51, 269–272 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    P.et al.Few-femtosecond soft x-ray transient absorption spectroscopy with tuneable DUV-Vis pump pulses.Optica11, 1320–1323 (2024)

    Lee, J. P.et al.Few-femtosecond soft x-ray transient absorption spectroscopy with tuneable DUV-Vis pump pulses.Optica11, 1320–1323 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    & W¨ orner, H

    Huppert, M., Jordan, I. & W¨ orner, H. J. Attosecond beamline with actively stabilized and spatially separated beam paths.Rev. Sci. Instrum.86, 123106 15 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    Borrego-Varillas, R.et al.Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy in the ultraviolet by a birefringent delay line.Optics Express24, 28491–28499 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Volume III: Elec- tronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Polyatomic Molecules(Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1966)

    Herzberg, G.Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. Volume III: Elec- tronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Polyatomic Molecules(Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1966)

    work page 1966

  59. [59]

    B., Decius, J

    Wilson, E. B., Decius, J. C. & Cross, P. C.Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra(Courier Corporation, 1980)

    work page 1980

  60. [60]

    & Pearson, B

    Weinacht, T. & Pearson, B. J.Time-Resolved Spectroscopy: An Experimental Perspective(CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    & Zanni, M.Concepts and Methods of 2D Infrared Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    Hamm, P. & Zanni, M.Concepts and Methods of 2D Infrared Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Fuller, F. D. & Ogilvie, J. P. Experimental implementations of two-dimensional fourier transform electronic spectroscopy.Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.66, 667–690 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    & Williams, T

    Potts, A., Price, W., Streets, D. & Williams, T. Photoelectron spectra of benzene and some fluorobenzenes.Faraday Discuss.54, 168–181 (1972)

    work page 1972

  64. [64]

    & Feurer, T

    Rozgonyi, T., Glaß, A. & Feurer, T. Application of nonreflecting boundary con- dition for numerical simulation of molecular photoionization dynamics.J. Appl. Phys.88, 2936–2942 (2000)

    work page 2000

  65. [65]

    & Bolovinos, A

    Pantos, E., Philis, J. & Bolovinos, A. The extinction coefficient of benzene vapor in the region 4.6 to 36 eV.J. Mol. Spectrosc.72, 36–43 (1978)

    work page 1978

  66. [66]

    & Cederbaum, L

    Meyer, H.-D., Manthe, U. & Cederbaum, L. S. The multi-configurational time- dependent Hartree approach.Chem. Phys. Lett.165, 73–78 (1990). Acknowledgements.We gratefully acknowledge Varun Makhija, Spiridoula Mat- sika, and Benjamin G. Levine for helpful discussions. L.T-H.N., J.C., J.O. and T.W. were funded by the National Science Foundation under award n...

    work page 1990