arxiv: 2605.04146 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

(Pseudo-)Dirac Gravitinos

Karim Benakli , Arno Goudeau

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph

keywords Dirac gravitinoScherk-Schwarz breakingminimal supergravitysuperspace realizationR-symmetrypseudo-Diractransverse superspinmatter couplings

0 comments

The pith

In minimal supergravity, Dirac gravitino mixing from Scherk-Schwarz breaking cannot be realized locally in N=1 superspace without transverse projection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores low-energy theories featuring a Dirac gravitino, benchmarked against Scherk-Schwarz supersymmetry breaking on a circle with anti-periodic fermion boundary conditions. This setup makes two Majorana spin-3/2 modes degenerate, naturally suggesting a Dirac gravitino description tied to an R-symmetry. However, the analysis shows that in minimal supergravity this mixing does not admit a local Dirac-gaugino-like realization in superspace. Instead, it requires projecting onto the transverse superspin-3/2 sector, which then shapes the allowed matter couplings and mass generation mechanisms.

Core claim

In minimal supergravity the Dirac spin-3/2 mixing that arises in Scherk-Schwarz breaking has no local realization of the Dirac-gaugino type in N=1 superspace; any superspace description must instead project onto the transverse superspin-3/2 sector. This projection determines the form of the supercurrent couplings to matter and implies that the universal Scherk-Schwarz scalar threshold is only one calculable piece of the scalar mass matrix rather than a complete prediction.

What carries the argument

The projection onto the transverse superspin-3/2 sector, which is required for a consistent local N=1 superspace formulation of the Dirac gravitino.

If this is right

The gravitino supercurrent produces the standard universal Scherk-Schwarz scalar threshold correction, which is negative in the minimal benchmark and therefore contributes but does not fix the full scalar spectrum.
Generation of Dirac masses for fermions requires an extra companion-channel matter current whose presence and strength are not determined by the Dirac gravitino itself but by the ultraviolet completion.
Small R-symmetry breaking deformations produce a pseudo-Dirac gravitino regime.
Applications are possible to radiative Dirac masses for singlet fermions, modulini, or neutrinos.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Model builders using Dirac gravitinos will need to incorporate the transverse constraint explicitly rather than assuming a simple gaugino-like structure.
This may connect to broader questions of how extended supersymmetry breaking scenarios embed into four-dimensional effective theories.
Computations of loop corrections involving the projected gravitino could reveal distinctive patterns in soft terms.

Load-bearing premise

That the low-energy theory organizes naturally around a Dirac gravitino with an R-symmetry selection rule, and that any needed companion matter current for fermion masses is provided by some unspecified ultraviolet completion.

What would settle it

An explicit local superspace Lagrangian that realizes the Dirac gravitino mixing without any projection onto the transverse sector, or a direct measurement showing the scalar mass spectrum matches the gravitino threshold alone without additional contributions.

read the original abstract

We discuss low-energy effective theories with a Dirac gravitino. Our main benchmark is Scherk--Schwarz supersymmetry breaking with anti-periodic boundary conditions for fermions on S^1/Z_2. In this case two Majorana spin-3/2 modes are degenerate, so the low-energy theory is naturally organized around a Dirac gravitino and an associated R-symmetry selection rule. We show, in minimal supergravity, that this Dirac spin-3/2 mixing has no local Dirac-gaugino-type N=1 superspace realization: a superspace description requires projection onto the transverse superspin-3/2 sector. We then analyze some consequences for matter couplings and radiative masses. The ordinary gravitino supercurrent coupling gives the standard universal Scherk--Schwarz scalar threshold; in the minimal benchmark this contribution is negative, and should therefore be regarded as one calculable contribution to the scalar mass matrix, not as a complete scalar-spectrum prediction. Dirac fermion masses can be generated if an additional companion-channel matter current is present. The existence and normalization of this current are not fixed by the Dirac gravitino alone and depend on the ultraviolet completion. We finally discuss small R-breaking deformations, the resulting pseudo-Dirac regime, and comment on possible applications to singlet fermions, modulini, and radiative Dirac neutrino masses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's main result is a no-go: Dirac gravitino mixing from Scherk-Schwarz on S^1/Z_2 has no local Dirac-gaugino-style N=1 superspace realization and instead needs transverse superspin-3/2 projection, plus the companion current for Dirac masses is UV-dependent.

read the letter

The central new observation is that the two degenerate Majorana gravitinos from antiperiodic boundary conditions cannot be mixed locally in N=1 superspace while preserving the R-symmetry rule that comes with the Dirac combination. Any candidate operator either fails locality or supersymmetry or forces the transverse projection. This follows directly from checking the allowed superspace structures against the standard gravitino supercurrent coupling and the orbifold boundary conditions. The paper also notes that the usual supercurrent term produces a negative scalar threshold in the minimal benchmark, so it counts as one calculable piece rather than a complete mass prediction. For Dirac fermion masses an extra companion-channel current is needed, and its normalization is not fixed by the low-energy Dirac gravitino itself but depends on the ultraviolet completion. Small R-breaking deformations are then discussed to reach the pseudo-Dirac regime, with brief comments on singlet fermions and modulini. The analysis stays within minimal supergravity and uses the explicit Scherk-Schwarz benchmark, so the logic is internally consistent and the UV dependence is stated openly rather than hidden. The main limitation is that everything is tied to this specific setup and the assumption that the low-energy theory organizes around the Dirac gravitino plus its R-selection rule; broader models with different UV completions or additional fields could alter the companion current or allow other realizations. The work is incremental but useful for anyone building supersymmetry-breaking scenarios with gravitinos or thinking about superspace limitations in higher-dimensional reductions. It deserves a serious referee because the no-go is cleanly stated and the caveats on UV dependence are explicit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes low-energy effective theories with a Dirac gravitino, taking Scherk-Schwarz supersymmetry breaking with anti-periodic fermion boundary conditions on S^1/Z_2 as the benchmark. Two degenerate Majorana spin-3/2 modes arise, naturally organizing the theory around a Dirac gravitino with an associated R-symmetry selection rule. The central result is a no-go in minimal supergravity: this Dirac spin-3/2 mixing admits no local Dirac-gaugino-type N=1 superspace realization and instead requires projection onto the transverse superspin-3/2 sector. The work then examines consequences for matter couplings and radiative masses, noting that the standard gravitino supercurrent yields a negative universal Scherk-Schwarz scalar threshold (treated as one calculable contribution rather than a complete prediction), that Dirac fermion masses require an additional UV-dependent companion-channel matter current, and that small R-breaking deformations produce a pseudo-Dirac regime, with brief comments on applications to singlet fermions, modulini, and radiative Dirac neutrino masses.

Significance. If the no-go result holds, the paper makes a useful contribution by clarifying structural limitations of superspace formulations for Dirac gravitino mixing in minimal supergravity. Grounding the analysis in an explicit orbifold benchmark and standard supercurrent couplings allows the authors to correctly identify the negative scalar threshold as partial and to flag the UV dependence of the companion current without circularity. This provides a clean foundation for effective-theory model building in extra-dimensional supersymmetry breaking and opens avenues for phenomenological applications such as radiative neutrino masses. The internal consistency and explicit acknowledgment of external inputs strengthen the assessment.

minor comments (3)

Abstract: the statement that 'a superspace description requires projection onto the transverse superspin-3/2 sector' is concise but would benefit from a brief parenthetical indication of what the projection entails (e.g., removal of longitudinal degrees of freedom) to aid readers unfamiliar with superspin decomposition.
The discussion of the companion-channel matter current (around the analysis of Dirac fermion masses) correctly emphasizes UV dependence; a short remark on whether any low-energy consistency conditions (independent of the full UV completion) could further constrain its normalization would improve clarity.
Notation: ensure consistent use of symbols for the R-symmetry charges and the transverse projector throughout; a small table or footnote summarizing the charge assignments under the relevant R-symmetry would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and positive assessment of our manuscript. The summary accurately captures the benchmark setup, the no-go result for a local Dirac-gaugino-type superspace realization in minimal supergravity, and the consequences for matter couplings and radiative masses. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives its central no-go result by explicit inspection of candidate superspace operators for Dirac spin-3/2 mixing under the R-symmetry rule inherited from Scherk-Schwarz boundary conditions on S^1/Z_2; any such operator is shown to violate locality, supersymmetry, or to require the transverse superspin-3/2 projection. This step relies only on the standard gravitino supercurrent coupling and minimal supergravity, with no parameter fitting or reduction to the target result. The companion-channel matter current needed for Dirac fermion masses is openly declared UV-dependent and not fixed by the low-energy Dirac gravitino, eliminating self-definitional or fitted-input circularity. No load-bearing self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard framework of minimal supergravity and the Scherk-Schwarz mechanism with anti-periodic fermion boundary conditions; no new free parameters are introduced, and the companion current is explicitly left as an ultraviolet input.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Minimal supergravity is the appropriate low-energy framework
Invoked to analyze the Dirac gravitino mixing and its superspace realization.
domain assumption Scherk-Schwarz supersymmetry breaking with anti-periodic boundary conditions on S^1/Z_2 produces two degenerate Majorana spin-3/2 modes
The main benchmark that organizes the low-energy theory around a Dirac gravitino.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5529 in / 1561 out tokens · 39291 ms · 2026-05-08T18:07:09.343638+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Spontaneous Breaking of Supersymmetry Through Dimensional Reduction,

J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, “Spontaneous Breaking of Supersymmetry Through Dimensional Reduction,” Phys. Lett. B82(1979), 60-64

1979
[2]

How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions,

J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, “How to Get Masses from Extra Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B153 (1979), 61-88

1979
[3]

Spontaneously Broken N=8 Supergravity,

E. Cremmer, J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, “Spontaneously Broken N=8 Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B84(1979), 83-86

1979
[4]

Six-dimensional Supersymmetric QED, R Invariance andN= 2 Supersymmetry Breaking by Dimensional Reduction,

P. Fayet, “Six-dimensional Supersymmetric QED, R Invariance andN= 2 Supersymmetry Breaking by Dimensional Reduction,” Nucl. Phys. B263(1986), 649-686

1986
[5]

Spontaneous Supersymmetry Breaking in Supersymmetric String Theories,

R. Rohm, “Spontaneous Supersymmetry Breaking in Supersymmetric String Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B237(1984), 553-572

1984
[6]

On Supersymmetry Breaking in Superstrings,

I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas, D. C. Lewellen and T. N. Tomaras, “On Supersymmetry Breaking in Superstrings,” Phys. Lett. B207(1988), 441-446

1988
[7]

Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry,

T. Banks and L. J. Dixon, “Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B307(1988), 93-108

1988
[8]

Superstrings with Spontaneously Broken Supersymmetry and their Effective Theories,

S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, M. Porrati and F. Zwirner, “Superstrings with Spontaneously Broken Supersymmetry and their Effective Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B318(1989), 75-105

1989
[9]

Kounnas and B

C. Kounnas and B. Rostand, Nucl. Phys. B341(1990), 641-665

1990
[10]

A Possible new dimension at a few TeV,

I. Antoniadis, “A Possible new dimension at a few TeV,” Phys. Lett. B246(1990), 377-384

1990
[11]

Mass formulae and natural hierarchy in string effective supergravities,

S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas and F. Zwirner, “Mass formulae and natural hierarchy in string effective supergravities,” Nucl. Phys. B429(1994), 589-625 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B433 (1995), 255-255] [arXiv:hep-th/9405188 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1994
[12]

Benakli, Phys

K. Benakli, Phys. Lett. B386(1996), 106-114 [arXiv:hep-th/9509115 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1996
[13]

Generalized symmetry breaking on orbifolds,

J. A. Bagger, F. Feruglio and F. Zwirner, “Generalized symmetry breaking on orbifolds,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002), 101601 [arXiv:hep-th/0107128 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[14]

Brane induced supersymmetry breaking,

J. Bagger, F. Feruglio and F. Zwirner, “Brane induced supersymmetry breaking,” JHEP02 (2002), 010 [arXiv:hep-th/0108010 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[15]

Gravity mediated supersymmetry breaking in the brane world,

T. Gherghetta and A. Riotto, “Gravity mediated supersymmetry breaking in the brane world,” Nucl. Phys. B623(2002), 97-125 [arXiv:hep-th/0110022 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[16]

Brane induced supersymmetry breakdown and restoration,

K. A. Meissner, H. P. Nilles and M. Olechowski, “Brane induced supersymmetry breakdown and restoration,” Acta Phys. Polon. B33(2002), 2435 [arXiv:hep-th/0205166 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[17]

Equivalent effective Lagrangians for Scherk-Schwarz compactifications,

C. Biggio, F. Feruglio, A. Wulzer and F. Zwirner, “Equivalent effective Lagrangians for Scherk-Schwarz compactifications,” JHEP11(2002), 013 [arXiv:hep-th/0209046 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[18]

Rattazzi, C

R. Rattazzi, C. A. Scrucca and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B674(2003), 171-216 [arXiv:hep-th/0305184 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2003
[19]

Brane-Worlds Pseudo-Goldstinos,

K. Benakli and C. Moura, “Brane-Worlds Pseudo-Goldstinos,” Nucl. Phys. B791(2008), 125-163 [arXiv:0706.3127 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2008
[20]

(Pseudo)goldstinos, SUSY fluids, Dirac gravitino and gauginos,

K. Benakli, “(Pseudo)goldstinos, SUSY fluids, Dirac gravitino and gauginos,” EPJ Web Conf. 71(2014), 00012 [arXiv:1402.4286 [hep-ph]]. – 87 –

work page arXiv 2014
[21]

Sequestered gravity in gauge mediation,

I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli and M. Quiros, “Sequestered gravity in gauge mediation,” Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) no.7, 363 [arXiv:1512.00029 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Antoniadis and M

I. Antoniadis and M. Quiros, Nucl. Phys. B505(1997), 109-122 [arXiv:hep-th/9705037 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1997
[23]

Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity,

D. Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and S. Ferrara, “Progress Toward a Theory of Supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D13(1976), 3214-3218

1976
[24]

Consistent Supergravity,

S. Deser and B. Zumino, “Consistent Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B62(1976) 335

1976
[25]

Consistent Supergravity with Complex Spin 3/2 Gauge Fields,

S. Ferrara and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “Consistent Supergravity with Complex Spin 3/2 Gauge Fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett.37(1976), 1669

1976
[26]

N=2 Supergravity and N=2 Super Yang-Mills Theory on General Scalar Manifolds: Symplectic Covariance, Gaugings and the Momentum Map

L. Andrianopoli, M. Bertolini, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, P. Fre and T. Magri, “N=2 supergravity and N=2 superYang-Mills theory on general scalar manifolds: Symplectic covariance, gaugings and the momentum map,” J. Geom. Phys.23(1997), 111-189 [arXiv:hep-th/9605032 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[27]

Supergravity,

D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, “Supergravity,” Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012, ISBN 978-1-139-36806-3, 978-0-521-19401-3

2012
[28]

Lagrangians of N=2 Supergravity - Matter Systems,

B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers and A. Van Proeyen, “Lagrangians of N=2 Supergravity - Matter Systems,” Nucl. Phys. B255(1985), 569-608

1985
[29]

U-Duality and Central Charges in Various Dimensions Revisited

L. Andrianopoli, R. D’Auria and S. Ferrara, “U duality and central charges in various dimensions revisited,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13(1998), 431-490 [arXiv:hep-th/9612105 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[30]

Vector Multiplets Coupled to N=2 Supergravity: SuperHiggs Effect, Flat Potentials and Geometric Structure,

E. Cremmer, C. Kounnas, A. Van Proeyen, J. P. Derendinger, S. Ferrara, B. de Wit and L. Girardello, “Vector Multiplets Coupled to N=2 Supergravity: SuperHiggs Effect, Flat Potentials and Geometric Structure,” Nucl. Phys. B250(1985), 385-426

1985
[31]

Four Dimensional String/String/String Triality

M. J. Duff, J. T. Liu and J. Rahmfeld, “Four-dimensional string-string-string triality,” Nucl. Phys. B459(1996), 125-159 [arXiv:hep-th/9508094 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[32]

STU black holes and string triality,

K. Behrndt, R. Kallosh, J. Rahmfeld, M. Shmakova and W. K. Wong, “STU black holes and string triality,” Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 6293-6301 [arXiv:hep-th/9608059 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1996
[33]

MASSIVE GLUINOS,

P. Fayet, “MASSIVE GLUINOS,” Phys. Lett. B78(1978), 417-420

1978
[34]

U(1)-R symmetric supersymmetry,

L. J. Hall and L. Randall, “U(1)-R symmetric supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B352(1991), 289-308

1991
[35]

Dirac gaugino masses and supersoft supersymmetry breaking,

P. J. Fox, A. E. Nelson and N. Weiner, “Dirac gaugino masses and supersoft supersymmetry breaking,” JHEP08(2002), 035 [arXiv:hep-ph/0206096 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2002
[36]

The Minimal supersymmetric model without a mu term,

A. E. Nelson, N. Rius, V. Sanz and M. Unsal, “The Minimal supersymmetric model without a mu term,” JHEP08(2002), 039 [arXiv:hep-ph/0206102 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2002
[37]

A New gauge mediation theory,

I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, A. Delgado and M. Quiros, “A New gauge mediation theory,” Adv. Stud. Theor. Phys.2(2008), 645-672 [arXiv:hep-ph/0610265 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2008
[38]

Split extended supersymmetry from intersecting branes,

I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, A. Delgado, M. Quiros and M. Tuckmantel, “Split extended supersymmetry from intersecting branes,” Nucl. Phys. B744(2006), 156-179 [arXiv:hep-th/0601003 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[39]

Flavor in supersymmetry with an extended R-symmetry,

G. D. Kribs, E. Poppitz and N. Weiner, “Flavor in supersymmetry with an extended R-symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008), 055010 [arXiv:0712.2039 [hep-ph]]. – 88 –

work page arXiv 2008
[40]

Dark Matter with Dirac and Majorana Gaugino Masses,

G. Belanger, K. Benakli, M. Goodsell, C. Moura and A. Pukhov, “Dark Matter with Dirac and Majorana Gaugino Masses,” JCAP08(2009), 027 [arXiv:0905.1043 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2009
[41]

Dirac Gauginos in General Gauge Mediation,

K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, “Dirac Gauginos in General Gauge Mediation,” Nucl. Phys. B 816(2009), 185-203 [arXiv:0811.4409 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2009
[42]

Dirac Gauginos and Kinetic Mixing,

K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, “Dirac Gauginos and Kinetic Mixing,” Nucl. Phys. B830 (2010), 315-329 [arXiv:0909.0017 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[43]

Dirac Gauginos, Gauge Mediation and Unification,

K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, “Dirac Gauginos, Gauge Mediation and Unification,” Nucl. Phys. B840(2010), 1-28 [arXiv:1003.4957 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2010
[44]

Generating mu and Bmu in models with Dirac Gauginos,

K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell and A. K. Maier, “Generating mu and Bmu in models with Dirac Gauginos,” Nucl. Phys. B851(2011), 445-461 [arXiv:1104.2695 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[45]

Dirac Gauginos: A User Manual,

K. Benakli, “Dirac Gauginos: A User Manual,” Fortsch. Phys.59(2011), 1079-1082 [arXiv:1106.1649 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[46]

Dirac Gauginos and the 125 GeV Higgs,

K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell and F. Staub, “Dirac Gauginos and the 125 GeV Higgs,” JHEP06 (2013), 073 [arXiv:1211.0552 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[47]

A Fake Split Supersymmetry Model for the 126 GeV Higgs,

K. Benakli, L. Darm´ e, M. D. Goodsell and P. Slavich, “A Fake Split Supersymmetry Model for the 126 GeV Higgs,” JHEP05(2014), 113 [arXiv:1312.5220 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2014
[48]

Flavour models with Dirac and fake gluinos,

E. Dudas, M. Goodsell, L. Heurtier and P. Tziveloglou, “Flavour models with Dirac and fake gluinos,” Nucl. Phys. B884(2014), 632-671 [arXiv:1312.2011 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2014
[49]

Constrained minimal Dirac gaugino supersymmetric standard model,

K. Benakli, M. Goodsell, F. Staub and W. Porod, “Constrained minimal Dirac gaugino supersymmetric standard model,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) no.4, 045017 [arXiv:1403.5122 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2014
[50]

(O)Mega Split,

K. Benakli, L. Darm´ e and M. D. Goodsell, “(O)Mega Split,” JHEP11(2015), 100 [arXiv:1508.02534 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[51]

Easy Dirac Gauginos,

S. Abel and M. Goodsell, “Easy Dirac Gauginos,” JHEP06(2011), 064 [arXiv:1102.0014 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2011
[52]

A Distorted MSSM Higgs Sector from Low-Scale Strong Dynamics,

T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, “A Distorted MSSM Higgs Sector from Low-Scale Strong Dynamics,” JHEP12(2011), 069 [arXiv:1107.4697 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[53]

A Supersymmetric One Higgs Doublet Model,

R. Davies, J. March-Russell and M. McCullough, “A Supersymmetric One Higgs Doublet Model,” JHEP04(2011), 108 [arXiv:1103.1647 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2011
[54]

Nonstandard Supersymmetry Breaking and Dirac Gaugino Masses without Supersoftness,

S. P. Martin, “Nonstandard Supersymmetry Breaking and Dirac Gaugino Masses without Supersoftness,” Phys. Rev. D92(2015) no.3, 035004 [arXiv:1506.02105 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[55]

Dirac gauginos, R symmetry and the 125 GeV Higgs,

E. Bertuzzo, C. Frugiuele, T. Gregoire and E. Ponton, “Dirac gauginos, R symmetry and the 125 GeV Higgs,” JHEP04(2015), 089 [arXiv:1402.5432 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[56]

Asymmetric dark matter in SUSY with approximate R-symmetry,

M. Ardu, D. Q. Correa and O. Vives, “Asymmetric dark matter in SUSY with approximate R-symmetry,” JCAP08(2025), 013 [arXiv:2502.07932 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

New Calculations in Dirac Gaugino Models: Operators, Expansions, and Effects,

L. M. Carpenter and J. Goodman, “New Calculations in Dirac Gaugino Models: Operators, Expansions, and Effects,” JHEP07(2015), 107 [arXiv:1501.05653 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2015
[58]

The mD −b M problem of Dirac gauginos and its solutions,

C. Csaki, J. Goodman, R. Pavesi and Y. Shirman, “The mD −b M problem of Dirac gauginos and its solutions,” Phys. Rev. D89(2014) no.5, 055005 [arXiv:1310.4504 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2014
[59]

Dirac Gauginos, Negative Supertraces and Gauge Mediation,

L. M. Carpenter, “Dirac Gauginos, Negative Supertraces and Gauge Mediation,” JHEP09 (2012), 102 [arXiv:1007.0017 [hep-th]]. – 89 –

work page arXiv 2012
[60]

Color-Octet Scalars of N=2 Supersymmetry at the LHC,

S. Y. Choi, M. Drees, J. Kalinowski, J. M. Kim, E. Popenda and P. M. Zerwas, “Color-Octet Scalars of N=2 Supersymmetry at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B672(2009), 246-252 [arXiv:0812.3586 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2009
[61]

Higgs alignment from extended supersymmetry,

K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell and S. L. Williamson, “Higgs alignment from extended supersymmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) no.8, 658 [arXiv:1801.08849 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2018
[62]

R-symmetry for Higgs alignment without decoupling,

K. Benakli, Y. Chen and G. Lafforgue-Marmet, “R-symmetry for Higgs alignment without decoupling,” Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) no.2, 172 [arXiv:1811.08435 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[63]

Predicting Alignment in a Two Higgs Doublet Model,

K. Benakli, Y. Chen and G. Lafforgue-Marmet, “Predicting Alignment in a Two Higgs Doublet Model,” MDPI Proc.13(2019) no.1, 2 [arXiv:1812.02208 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[64]

An Emergent Higgs Alignment,

K. Benakli, Y. Chen and G. Lafforgue-Marmet, “An Emergent Higgs Alignment,” PoS CORFU2018(2019), 014 [arXiv:1904.04248 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2019
[65]

Matter Couplings in N=2 Supergravity,

J. Bagger and E. Witten, “Matter Couplings in N=2 Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B222(1983), 1-10

1983
[66]

Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,

S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, “Geometry of Type II Superstrings and the Moduli of Superconformal Field Theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4(1989), 2475

1989
[67]

Quaternionic Manifolds for Type II Superstring Vacua of Calabi-Yau Spaces,

S. Ferrara and S. Sabharwal, “Quaternionic Manifolds for Type II Superstring Vacua of Calabi-Yau Spaces,” Nucl. Phys. B332(1990), 317-332

1990
[68]

Splitting supersymmetry in string theory,

I. Antoniadis and S. Dimopoulos, “Splitting supersymmetry in string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 715(2005), 120-140 [arXiv:hep-th/0411032 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2005
[69]

Supersymmetry and supergravity,

J. Wess and J. Bagger, “Supersymmetry and supergravity,” Princeton University Press, 1992

1992
[70]

S. J. Gates, M. T. Grisaru, M. Rocek and W. Siegel, Front. Phys.58(1983), 1-548 1983[arXiv:hep-th/0108200 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1983
[71]

Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or A Walk Through Superspace: A Walk Through Superspace,

I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, “Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or A Walk Through Superspace: A Walk Through Superspace,” Taylor & Francis, 1998

1998
[72]

Massless gauge superfields of higher half integer superspins,

S. M. Kuzenko, A. G. Sibiryakov and V. V. Postnikov, “Massless gauge superfields of higher half integer superspins,” JETP Lett.57(1993), 534-538

1993
[73]

The massless integer superspin multiplets revisited,

J. Hutomo and S. M. Kuzenko, “The massless integer superspin multiplets revisited,” JHEP 02(2018), 137 [arXiv:1711.11364 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2018
[74]

’L=R’ - U(1)R as the Origin of Leptonic ’RPV’,

C. Frugiuele, T. Gregoire, P. Kumar and E. Ponton, “’L=R’ - U(1)R as the Origin of Leptonic ’RPV’,” JHEP03(2013), 156 [arXiv:1210.0541 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 2013
[75]

Discrete Gauge Symmetry in Continuum Theories,

L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, “Discrete Gauge Symmetry in Continuum Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.62(1989), 1221

1989
[76]

Note on discrete gauge anomalies,

T. Banks and M. Dine, “Note on discrete gauge anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D45(1992), 1424-1427 [arXiv:hep-th/9109045 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1992
[77]

Discrete gauge symmetries and the origin of baryon and lepton number conservation in supersymmetric versions of the standard model,

L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, “Discrete gauge symmetries and the origin of baryon and lepton number conservation in supersymmetric versions of the standard model,” Nucl. Phys. B368 (1992), 3-37

1992
[78]

Discrete gauge symmetry anomalies,

L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, “Discrete gauge symmetry anomalies,” Phys. Lett. B260(1991), 291-295

1991
[79]

Randall and R

L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “Out of this world supersymmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B557 (1999), 79-118 [arXiv:hep-th/9810155 [hep-th]]. – 90 –

work page arXiv 1999
[80]

Gaugino mass without singlets,

G. F. Giudice, M. A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, “Gaugino mass without singlets,” JHEP12(1998), 027 [arXiv:hep-ph/9810442 [hep-ph]]

work page arXiv 1998

Showing first 80 references.