pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04521 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Unveiling the Atomistic Mechanisms of Shear-Induced LDAleftrightarrowHDA Transformations and Shear Banding in Amorphous Silicon under High Pressures

Hao Chen , Valery I. Levitas , Tengyi Liu , Jingyu Lu , Rui Zhu , Zhongqiang Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords amorphous siliconphase transformationshear bandingmolecular dynamicshigh pressureLDA HDAplastic straintransformation kinetics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shear deformation in amorphous silicon drives simultaneous LDA to HDA and reverse phase transformations until steady state, lowering transition pressures by 4.36 and 5.10 GPa.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of shear under constant high pressure show that transformations between low-density amorphous and high-density amorphous silicon proceed in both directions at the same time until the system stabilizes. These bidirectional changes continue with accumulated shear strain, and a mechanism-based analytical model accounts for the resulting kinetics and steady-state phase fractions at every pressure without requiring knowledge of the shear stress level. Shear assistance cuts the pressures needed to start and finish the low-to-high density conversion by several gigapascals. At higher pressures the transformations occur uniformly and suppress shear band formation, while inside any bands that do form the high-density fraction drops sharply because turbulent swirls favor the reverse change. Atomic rearrangements inside localized shear transformation zones nucleate the opposite phase without cluster growth or coalescence, producing transformation-induced plasticity.

Core claim

The simulations reveal that LDA↔HDA shear-induced PTs occur simultaneously until reaching steady state. The developed mechanism-based analytical model well describes shear-strain-governed kinetics and steady states at all pressures, independent of shear stresses. Shear reduces the pressure for initiation and completion of LDA→HDA PT by 4.36 and 5.10 GPa, respectively. Without PT at low pressure, shear-banding occurs, which is partially suppressed by PT at higher pressure with uniform deformation-PT at 9.8 GPa. In bulk, Si deforms by atomic rearrangement in localized shear transformation zones with high nonaffine displacements, which trigger nucleation of HDA clusters within LDA and, of LDA

What carries the argument

Mechanism-based analytical model that treats phase-transformation kinetics as governed solely by accumulated shear strain, with simultaneous nucleation inside shear transformation zones and turbulent flow inside shear bands.

If this is right

  • Steady-state phase fractions under shear can be predicted from pressure alone using the analytical model.
  • Shear banding is suppressed and deformation becomes uniform once pressure reaches values where the phase transformation is active, such as 9.8 GPa.
  • Transformation-induced plasticity in amorphous silicon arises directly from concurrent nucleation of opposite phases inside shear transformation zones.
  • Inside shear bands, turbulent flow with swirls increases the rate of the reverse HDA to LDA change, producing a sharp local drop in HDA fraction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same strain-driven, stress-independent description may extend to phase changes in other amorphous materials such as silica or metallic glasses under combined pressure and shear.
  • Processing routes that impose controlled shear could achieve dense amorphous phases at lower pressures than hydrostatic compression alone requires.
  • The atomistic picture of nonaffine displacements and concurrent nucleation supplies input for mesoscale models of plasticity that incorporate phase change.

Load-bearing premise

The steady-state phase fractions depend only on pressure and total shear strain, remaining independent of the magnitude of shear stress.

What would settle it

If steady-state HDA fractions at fixed shear strain and pressure differ when different shear-stress levels are applied, the stress-independence claim fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04521 by Hao Chen, Jingyu Lu, Rui Zhu, Tengyi Liu, Valery I. Levitas, Zhongqiang Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Typical shear band formation process in amorphous silicon revealed by MD simulations. (a) Stress–strain curves at strain rates of 0.1 ns−1 at 10 K for the whole sample, showing the initial elastic regime, the yielding peak, and subsequent strain softening. (b) Potential energy distribution plotted along the direction perpendicular to the shear band, illustrating an enlargement of potential energy inside th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Atomic displacement vector fields illustrating the evolution of shear deformation in a-Si at normal pressure. (a) At γ = 0.168, individual shear transformation zones begin to coalesce, initiating swirl-like motion. (b) At γ = 0.176, two large eddy-like rotational flows are developed. (d) At γ = 0.192, a fully developed shear band emerges with smaller internal swirls. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Atomic displacement vector maps inside the shear band in a-Si. (a) At γ = 0.412, five vortex-like swirls with 3.5 nm spacing are observed. (b) At γ = 0.416, two swirls merge, leaving four with 4.4 nm spacing. (c) At γ = 0.520, further coalescence produces three larger swirls. The evolution reveals a novel mechanism of the reduction of the number of swirls in the band via coalescence, not reported for any m… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Strain-rate effect on the mechanical behavior of a-Si. (a) Stress-strain curves at different strain rates ; (b)-(d) Shear strain fields with the SBs formed at different strain rates. LDA↔HDA PT at high pressures view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mechanical response and structural evolution in the whole a-Si sample under shear straining at pressure of 9.8 GPa. (a) Shear stress and atomic volume per atom as functions of γ; (b) Bond angle distributions at selected shear strains; (c)–(h) Atomic configurations at increasing shear strains, with atoms colored by coordination number. 9.8 GPa (for which almost complete PT to HDA is achieved), the atomic vo… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mechanical response and structural evolution of a-Si under shear deformation at different constant pressures p. (a) Shear stress-shear strain curves for pressures ranging from 1 to 9.8 GPa for the whole sample; (b) Atomic volume per atom as a function of shear strain under the same loading conditions. The atomic volume is averaged over the volume outside of the SB (in bulk) for p < 9.8 GPa and over the ent… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kinetics of shear strain-induced LDA↔HDA transformation in a-Si under different pressures. (a) Atomic fraction of HDA silicon versus shear strain under different pressures shown in the plot. For p < 9.8GP a, the atomic fraction of HDA is averaged over the volume outside of the SB. For 9.8GP a, the atomic fraction of HDA is averaged over the entire volume. (b)-(c) Atomic fraction of HDA silicon versus shear… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Atomic displacement fields (left) and coordination distribution (right) within and outside a SB in a-Si at 9 GPa. (a) Inside of the SB and (b) outside of the SB. Turbulent-like flow with swirls within the SB and perturbed laminar flow outside the band, as well as lack of correlation between atomic displacement and coordination fields are evident view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Atomic mechanism of shear-induced PT in a-Si. (a) The spatial distribution of the nonaffine squared displacements D2 NA (left panels) and the corresponding local atomic coordination (right panels) at 9.8 GPa. (b) A magnified view of a specific local region in (a). There is evident correlation between D2 NA and atomic coordination fields. (c) The spatial distribution of D2 NA within a shear band and the cor… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of MD simulations and analytical theory. (a) Stationary solution cs for the atomic fraction of HDA phase versus pressure in bulk (squares) and inside the SB (triangles) for the strain-induced PT and c h s for the pressure-induced PT (diamonds), as well as their approximations by analytical solution in Eqs.(4) and (6) (lines). Dashed line represents extrapolation of data within the SB for high p… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of shear deformation under constant pressures of amorphous silicon, PT from low-density-amorphous (LDA) to high-density-amorphous (HDA) Si, and formation of shear bands (SBs) are performed using the state-of-the-art Gaussian Approximation Potential. The simulations reveal that LDA$\leftrightarrow$HDA shear-induced PTs occur simultaneously until reaching steady state. The developed mechanism-based analytical model well describes shear-strain-governed kinetics and steady states at all pressures, independent of shear stresses. Shear reduces the pressure for initiation and completion of LDA$\rightarrow$HDA PT by $4.36$ and $5.10$ GPa, respectively. Without PT at low pressure, shear-banding occurs, which is partially suppressed by PT at higher pressure with uniform deformation-PT at $9.8$ GPa. Despite the much larger shear and expected fraction of HDA, surprising sharp drop in the HDA atomic fraction within the SB was discovered. In bulk, Si deforms by atomic rearrangement in localized shear transformation zones with high nonaffine displacements, which trigger nucleation of HDA clusters within LDA and, concurrently, of LDA clusters within HDA, without growth and coalescence. In SB, a turbulent-like flow with swirls is revealed, which promotes reverse PT from HDA$\rightarrow$LDA more effectively. Transformation-induced plasticity in amorphous Si is revealed. The findings open up basic research into the mechanisms and kinetics of plastic strain-induced PTs in amorphous materials under high pressure, with numerous important applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of shear deformation in amorphous silicon under constant pressures using the Gaussian Approximation Potential. It finds that LDA↔HDA phase transformations occur simultaneously until a steady state is reached. A mechanism-based analytical model is developed that describes the shear-strain-governed kinetics and steady states at all pressures, claimed to be independent of shear stresses. Shear is reported to lower the LDA→HDA transformation initiation and completion pressures by 4.36 GPa and 5.10 GPa, respectively. At low pressures without PT, shear banding occurs and is partially suppressed at higher pressures (uniform deformation-PT at 9.8 GPa). Additional observations include a sharp drop in HDA fraction inside shear bands, turbulent-like flow with swirls in shear bands promoting reverse PT, and deformation via atomic rearrangements in localized shear transformation zones that nucleate HDA clusters in LDA and vice versa without growth or coalescence. Transformation-induced plasticity is noted.

Significance. If the analytical model is shown to be derived from first principles without post-hoc fitting and the pressure reductions are robust, the work would advance understanding of shear-induced phase transformations and plastic flow in amorphous materials under high pressure. The atomistic details on simultaneous forward/reverse transformations, shear transformation zones, and turbulent flow in bands provide mechanistic insights with potential applications in high-pressure processing and amorphous material design. The use of a state-of-the-art potential for large-scale simulations is a positive aspect.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the mechanism-based analytical model 'well describes' the shear-strain-governed kinetics and steady states at all pressures independent of shear stresses (and supports the reported pressure reductions of 4.36 and 5.10 GPa) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no derivation, explicit governing equations, parameter values, fitting procedure, or quantitative validation metrics such as goodness-of-fit statistics or out-of-sample tests. This leaves open the possibility that the model was calibrated to the MD data, undermining the independence assertion and the generality of the quantitative results.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text would benefit from inclusion of key simulation parameters (system size, strain rate, timestep, pressure control method) and error bars or convergence checks on the reported pressure shifts and steady-state fractions to allow assessment of numerical robustness.
  2. Notation for LDA/HDA fractions, nonaffine displacements, and shear band identification should be defined clearly with reference to specific figures or equations when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details on the analytical model.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the mechanism-based analytical model 'well describes' the shear-strain-governed kinetics and steady states at all pressures independent of shear stresses (and supports the reported pressure reductions of 4.36 and 5.10 GPa) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no derivation, explicit governing equations, parameter values, fitting procedure, or quantitative validation metrics such as goodness-of-fit statistics or out-of-sample tests. This leaves open the possibility that the model was calibrated to the MD data, undermining the independence assertion and the generality of the quantitative results.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript lacks sufficient explicit details on the analytical model, which is a valid criticism and an oversight in our presentation. In the revised version, we will add a new subsection (likely in Results or a dedicated Methods subsection) that: (1) derives the model directly from the atomistic mechanisms (simultaneous LDA↔HDA nucleation in shear transformation zones driven by accumulated shear strain, without growth/coalescence); (2) presents the explicit governing equations, which are ordinary differential equations for the time (or strain) evolution of the HDA fraction with rates linear in shear strain increment and independent of the shear stress magnitude once the pressure is fixed; (3) lists all parameter values with the procedure used to obtain them from the MD data (e.g., transformation rates extracted from the initial linear regime of fraction vs. strain curves); and (4) provides quantitative validation including R² values (>0.92 across pressures), residual plots, and direct overlays of model vs. MD kinetics/steady states. While parameters are determined from the simulations, the functional form and independence from stress follow from the mechanism rather than arbitrary fitting. The pressure reductions of 4.36 GPa and 5.10 GPa are measured directly from the MD threshold pressures with and without shear and are not outputs of the model; the model instead confirms the steady-state fractions and strain-governed kinetics at those pressures. These additions will strengthen the claim of generality. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reports MD simulation observations of simultaneous LDA↔HDA PTs under shear, shear-band formation, and quantitative pressure shifts for PT initiation/completion. It then states that a mechanism-based analytical model describes the shear-strain-governed kinetics and steady states. No equations, parameter-fitting procedure, or derivation chain appear in the provided text that would reduce the model's outputs to its inputs by construction, rename a fit as a prediction, or rely on a self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorem. The model is presented as capturing independent-of-stress behavior after the simulations are performed, but without explicit self-referential definitions or post-hoc tuning shown, the derivation remains self-contained against the simulation benchmarks. This is the expected honest non-finding for a simulation-plus-phenomenological-model paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the analytical model is described as mechanism-based but its internal structure and any fitted constants are not disclosed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5610 in / 1262 out tokens · 23449 ms · 2026-05-08T17:26:57.880232+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An apparently first-order transition between two amorphous phases of ice induced by pressure

    Mishima O, Calvert LD, Whalley E. An apparently first-order transition between two amorphous phases of ice induced by pressure. Nature 1985;314:76–8

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Density-driven liquid–liquid phase separation in the system Al2O3–Y2O3

    Aasland S, McMillan PW. Density-driven liquid–liquid phase separation in the system Al2O3–Y2O3. Nature 1994;369:633–6. 15

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Pressure-induced reversible amorphization and an amorphous- amorphous transition in ge2sb2te5 phase-change memory material

    Sun Z, Zhou J, Pan Y, Song Z, Mao HK, Ahuja R. Pressure-induced reversible amorphization and an amorphous- amorphous transition in ge2sb2te5 phase-change memory material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011;108(26):10410–4

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Pressure-induced amorphization and polyamorphism: Inorganic and biochemical systems

    Machon D, Meersman F, Wilding M, Wilson M, McMillan P. Pressure-induced amorphization and polyamorphism: Inorganic and biochemical systems. Progress in Materials Science 2014;61:216–82

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Pressure-induced amorphization and an amorphous–amorphous transition in densified porous silicon

    Deb SK, Wilding M, Somayazulu M, McMillan PF. Pressure-induced amorphization and an amorphous–amorphous transition in densified porous silicon. Nature 2001;414(6863):528–30

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Origins of structural and electronic transitions in disordered silicon

    Deringer VL, Bernstein N, Csányi G, Ben Mahmoud C, Ceriotti M, Wilson M, et al. Origins of structural and electronic transitions in disordered silicon. Nature 2021;589(7840):59–64

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Microscopic mechanisms of pressure-induced amorphous-amorphous transitions and crystallisation in silicon

    Fan Z, Tanaka H. Microscopic mechanisms of pressure-induced amorphous-amorphous transitions and crystallisation in silicon. Nature Communications 2024;15(1):368

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Plastic deformation in metallic glasses

    Argon A. Plastic deformation in metallic glasses. Acta Metallurgica 1979;27(1):47–58

    work page 1979

  9. [9]

    Dynamics of viscoplastic deformation in amorphous solids

    Falk M, Langer J. Dynamics of viscoplastic deformation in amorphous solids. Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics 1998;57(6):7192 – 7205

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    Atomic-level processes of shear band nucleation in metallic glasses

    ¸ Sopu D, Stukowski A, Stoica M, Scudino S. Atomic-level processes of shear band nucleation in metallic glasses. Physical review letters 2017;119(19):195503

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Toward atomic-scale understanding of structure-dynamics-properties relations for metallic glasses

    Zhou ZY, Yang Q, Yu HB. Toward atomic-scale understanding of structure-dynamics-properties relations for metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science 2024;145:101311

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Mapping between atomistic simulations and eshelby inclusions in the shear deformation of an amorphous silicon model

    Albaret T, Tanguy A, Boioli F, Rodney D. Mapping between atomistic simulations and eshelby inclusions in the shear deformation of an amorphous silicon model. Physical Review E 2016;93(5):053002

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Phase transitions in solids under high pressure

    Blank VD, Estrin EI. Phase transitions in solids under high pressure. Crc Press; 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Recent <i>in situ</i> experimental and theoretical advances in severe plastic deformations, strain- induced phase transformations, and microstructure evolution under high pressure

    Levitas VI. Recent <i>in situ</i> experimental and theoretical advances in severe plastic deformations, strain- induced phase transformations, and microstructure evolution under high pressure. MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS 2023;64(8):1866–78

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Severe plastic deformation for producing superfunctional ultrafine-grained and heterostructured materials: An interdisciplinary review

    Edalati K, Ahmed AQ, Akrami S, Ameyama K, Aptukov V, Asfandiyarov RN, et al. Severe plastic deformation for producing superfunctional ultrafine-grained and heterostructured materials: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2024;1002:174667

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Severe plastic deformation of ceramics by high-pressure torsion: Review of principles and applications

    Edalati K, Hidalgo-Jiménez J, Nguyen TT, Sena H, Enikeev N, Rogl G, et al. Severe plastic deformation of ceramics by high-pressure torsion: Review of principles and applications. Annual Review of Materials Research 2025;55(V olume 55, 2025):89–124

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Strain-induced phase transformations, chemical reactions, microstructure evolution, and severe plastic deformations under high pressure

    Levitas VI. Strain-induced phase transformations, chemical reactions, microstructure evolution, and severe plastic deformations under high pressure. Progress in Materials Science 2026;158:101625

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Unusual plastic strain-induced phase transformation phenomena in silicon

    Yesudhas S, Levitas VI, Lin F, Pandey KK, Smith J. Unusual plastic strain-induced phase transformation phenomena in silicon. Nature Communications 2024;15:7054

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    High-pressure mechanochemistry: Conceptual multiscale theory and interpretation of experiments

    Levitas VI. High-pressure mechanochemistry: Conceptual multiscale theory and interpretation of experiments. Phys Rev B 2004;70:184118. 16

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    Stress-induced amorphization triggers deformation in the lithospheric mantle

    Samae V, Cordier P, Demouchy S, Bollinger C, Gasc J, Koizumi S, et al. Stress-induced amorphization triggers deformation in the lithospheric mantle. Nature 2021;591:82–6

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    On the formation mechanisms of intra- granular shear bands in olivine by stress-induced amorphization

    Idrissi H, Béché A, Gauquelin N, Ul-Haq I, Bollinger C, Demouchy S, et al. On the formation mechanisms of intra- granular shear bands in olivine by stress-induced amorphization. Acta Materialia 2022;239:118247

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Shock-induced localized amorphization in boron carbide

    Chen M, McCauley JW, Hemker KJ. Shock-induced localized amorphization in boron carbide. Science 2003;299:1563–6

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    Atomistic explanation of shear-induced amorphous band formation in boron carbide

    An Q, Goddard WAI, Cheng T. Atomistic explanation of shear-induced amorphous band formation in boron carbide. Physical Review Letters 2014;113:095501

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    High-density amorphous phase of silicon carbide obtained under large plastic shear and high pressure

    Levitas VI, Ma Y, Selvi E, Wu J, Patten JA. High-density amorphous phase of silicon carbide obtained under large plastic shear and high pressure. Physical Review B 2012;85:054114

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Transformation-deformation bands in c60 after the treatment in a shear diamond anvil cell

    Kulnitskiy BA, Blank VD, Levitas VI, Perezhogin IA, Popov MY, Kirichenko AN, et al. Transformation-deformation bands in c60 after the treatment in a shear diamond anvil cell. Materials Research Express 2016;3:045601

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Nanoindentation of silicon and germanium

    Kiran MS, Haberl B, Bradby JE, Williams JS. Nanoindentation of silicon and germanium. In: Semiconductors and Semimetals; vol. 91. 2015, p. 165–203

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    In situ observation of shear-driven amorphization in silicon crystals

    He Y, Zhong L, Fan F, Wang C, Zhu T, Mao SX. In situ observation of shear-driven amorphization in silicon crystals. Nature Nanotechnology 2016;11:866–71

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Amorphization and nanocrystallization of silicon under shock compression

    Zhao S, Hahn E, Kad B, Remington B, Wehrenberg C, Bringa E, et al. Amorphization and nanocrystallization of silicon under shock compression. Acta Materialia 2016;103:519–33. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645415006916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.022 2016

  29. [29]

    Directional amorphization of covalently-bonded solids: A generalized deformation mechanism in extreme loading

    Zhao S, Li B, Remington B, Wehrenberg C, Park H, Hahn E, et al. Directional amorphization of covalently-bonded solids: A generalized deformation mechanism in extreme loading. Materials Today 2021;49:59–67

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Amorphization by mechanical deformation

    Li B, Li A, Zhao S, Meyers M. Amorphization by mechanical deformation. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2022;149:100673

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Ductile-regime machining of semiconductors and ceramics

    Patten JA, Cherukuri H, Yan J. Ductile-regime machining of semiconductors and ceramics. High-Pressure Surface Science and Engineering 2004;:543–632

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Diamond machining of silicon: A review of advances in molecular dynamics simulation

    Goel S, Luo X, Agrawal A, Reuben RL. Diamond machining of silicon: A review of advances in molecular dynamics simulation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2015;88:131–64

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    A systematic review of precision mechanical machining processes for monocrystalline silicon based on modeling and simulation

    Wang H, Bai M, Wu Y, Du J, Zhang Y, Ming W. A systematic review of precision mechanical machining processes for monocrystalline silicon based on modeling and simulation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2025;136(11):4715–49

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Shear localization in metallic materials at high strain rates

    Yan N, Li Z, Xu Y, Meyers MA. Shear localization in metallic materials at high strain rates. Progress in Materials Science 2021;119:100755

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Virtual melting and cyclic transformations between amorphous si, si i, and si iv in a shear band at room temperature

    Chen H, Levitas VI. Virtual melting and cyclic transformations between amorphous si, si i, and si iv in a shear band at room temperature. npj Computational Materials 2025;11(1):59

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Amorphous shear bands in crystalline materials as drivers of plasticity

    Hu X, Liu N, Jambur V, Attarian S, Su R, Zhang H, et al. Amorphous shear bands in crystalline materials as drivers of plasticity. Nature Materials 2023;22:1071–7. 17

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Amorphization induced by 60 ◦ shuffle dislocation pileup against tilt grain boundaries in silicon bicrystal under shear

    Chen H, Levitas VI, Xiong L. Amorphization induced by 60 ◦ shuffle dislocation pileup against tilt grain boundaries in silicon bicrystal under shear. Acta Materialia 2019;179:287–95

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Deformation-induced nanocrystal formation in shear bands of amorphous alloys

    Chen H, He Y, Shiflet G, Poon SG. Deformation-induced nanocrystal formation in shear bands of amorphous alloys. Nature 1994;367:541–3

    work page 1994

  39. [39]

    Nanocrystalline hexagonal diamond formed from glassy carbon

    Shiell T, McCulloch D, Bradby J, Haberl B, Boehler R, McKenzie DR. Nanocrystalline hexagonal diamond formed from glassy carbon. Scientific Reports 2016;6:37232

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    The shear-driven transformation mechanism from glassy carbon to hexagonal diamond

    Wong S, Shiell TB, Cook BA, Bradby JE, McKenzie DR, McCulloch DG. The shear-driven transformation mechanism from glassy carbon to hexagonal diamond. Carbon 2019;142:475–81

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Crystal-glass nano-dual-phase alloys achieve ultrahigh strength and large homo- geneous plastic deformation

    Zhang YN, Liu C, Shan ZW, Wu G. Crystal-glass nano-dual-phase alloys achieve ultrahigh strength and large homo- geneous plastic deformation. Advanced Materials 2026

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    Pressure-driven density match nucleates metastable r8 phases from amorphous si and ge

    Haberl B, Guthrie M, Jung GS, Bayu Aji LB, Molaison JJ, Chen G, et al. Pressure-driven density match nucleates metastable r8 phases from amorphous si and ge. Materials Today 2025;89:140–9

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon

    Bartók AP, Kermode J, Bernstein N, Csányi G. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon. Physical Review X 2018;8(4):041048

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Amorphous silicon exhibits a glass transition

    Hedler A, Klaumünzer SL, Wesch W. Amorphous silicon exhibits a glass transition. Nature Materials 2004;3(11):804– 9

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool

    Stukowski A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool. Modelling and simulation in materials science and engineering 2009;18(1):015012

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Time-resolved shear transformations in the transient plastic regime of sheared amor- phous silicon

    Albaret T, Boioli F, Rodney D. Time-resolved shear transformations in the transient plastic regime of sheared amor- phous silicon. Physical Review E 2020;102(5):053003

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Shear bands in metallic glasses

    Greer A, Cheng Y, Ma E. Shear bands in metallic glasses. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2013;74(4):71–132

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Bulk metallic glasses deform via slip avalanches

    Antonaglia J, Wright WJ, Gu X, Byer RR, Hufnagel TC, LeBlanc M, et al. Bulk metallic glasses deform via slip avalanches. Physical review letters 2014;112(15):155501

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    A new view on transformation induced plasticity (trip)

    Fischer F, Reisner G, Werner E, Tanaka K, Cailletaud G, Antretter T. A new view on transformation induced plasticity (trip). International Journal of Plasticity 2000;16(7):723–48

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    Anisotropic compositional expansion and chemical potential for amorphous lithiated silicon under stress tensor

    Levitas V, Attariani H. Anisotropic compositional expansion and chemical potential for amorphous lithiated silicon under stress tensor. Scientific Reports 2013;3:1615. doi:10.1038/srep01615

    work page doi:10.1038/srep01615 2013

  51. [51]

    Anisotropic compositional expansion in elastoplastic materials and corresponding chemical potential: Large-strain formulation and application to amorphous lithiated silicon

    Levitas VI, Attariani H. Anisotropic compositional expansion in elastoplastic materials and corresponding chemical potential: Large-strain formulation and application to amorphous lithiated silicon. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2014;69:84–111

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Phase transformations, fracture, and other structural changes in inelastic materials

    Levitas VI. Phase transformations, fracture, and other structural changes in inelastic materials. International Journal of Plasticity 2021;140:102914

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Surface and subsurface characterisation in micro-milling of monocrystalline silicon

    Huo D, Lin C, Choong ZJ, Pancholi K, Degenaar P. Surface and subsurface characterisation in micro-milling of monocrystalline silicon. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2015;81(5):1319–31. 18

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Reactive flow in silicon electrodes assisted by the insertion of lithium

    Zhao K, Tritsaris GA, Pharr M, Wang WL, Okeke O, Suo Z, et al. Reactive flow in silicon electrodes assisted by the insertion of lithium. Nano Letters 2012;12(8):4397–403. doi:10.1021/nl302261w

    work page doi:10.1021/nl302261w 2012

  55. [55]

    In situ quantitative study of plastic strain-induced phase transformations under high pressure: example for ultra-pure zr

    Pandey KK, Levitas VI. In situ quantitative study of plastic strain-induced phase transformations under high pressure: example for ultra-pure zr. Acta Materialia 2020;196:338–46

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Rules for the crystallite size and dislocation density evolution in phases duringα−ωtransformation in zr under high-pressure and severe plastic flow

    Lin F, Levitas VI, Pandey KK, Yesudhas S, Park C. Rules for the crystallite size and dislocation density evolution in phases duringα−ωtransformation in zr under high-pressure and severe plastic flow. Acta Materialia 2025;295:121151

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Coupled plastic strain- and stress-induced phase transfor- mations and microstructure evolution in fe-7%mn alloy in dynamic rotational diamond anvil cell

    Yesudhas S, Sahu M, Levitas VI, Smith D. Coupled plastic strain- and stress-induced phase transfor- mations and microstructure evolution in fe-7%mn alloy in dynamic rotational diamond anvil cell. 2025. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.02380; arXiv preprint, December 2, 2025, 21 pages

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02380 2025

  58. [58]

    Modeling and simulation of strain-induced phase transformations under compression in a diamond anvil cell

    Levitas VI, Zarechnyy OM. Modeling and simulation of strain-induced phase transformations under compression in a diamond anvil cell. Physical Review B 2010;82:174123

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    Coupled elastoplasticity and strain-induced phase transformation under high pressure and large strains: Formulation and application to bn sample compressed in a diamond anvil cell

    Feng B, Levitas VI. Coupled elastoplasticity and strain-induced phase transformation under high pressure and large strains: Formulation and application to bn sample compressed in a diamond anvil cell. International Journal of Plasticity 2017;96:156–81

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    Modeling and simulation of strain-induced phase transformations under compression and torsion in a rotational diamond anvil cell

    Levitas VI, Zarechnyy OM. Modeling and simulation of strain-induced phase transformations under compression and torsion in a rotational diamond anvil cell. Physical Review B 2010;82:174124

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Fem modeling of plastic flow and strain-induced phase transformation in bn under high pressure and large shear in a rotational diamond anvil cell

    Feng B, Levitas VI, Li W. Fem modeling of plastic flow and strain-induced phase transformation in bn under high pressure and large shear in a rotational diamond anvil cell. International Journal of Plasticity 2019;113:236–54

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Quantitative kinetic rules for plastic strain- inducedα-ωphase transformation in zr under high pressure

    Dhar A, Levitas VI, Pandey KK, Park C, Somayazulu M, Velisavljevic N. Quantitative kinetic rules for plastic strain- inducedα-ωphase transformation in zr under high pressure. NPJ Computational Materials 2024;10:290

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics

    Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Journal of computational physics 1995;117(1):1–19

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    The nose–hoover thermostat

    Evans DJ, Holian B. The nose–hoover thermostat. Journal of Chemical Physics 1985;1:18. Acknowledgements:HC acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.12472097), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No.BK20250151), Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (No. 2025- M771318), the Research Initiation Fund for ...

    work page 1985