pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05067 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational multipoles from scattering amplitudes in higher dimensions

Francesco Campanella , Fabio Riccioni
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords gravitational multipolesscattering amplitudeshigher-dimensional gravityMyers-Perry solutionKerr solutionspin universalitystress-energy tensorblack hole multipoles
0
0 comments X

The pith

In five dimensions, minimally coupled fields from scattering amplitudes produce multipoles that do not match the Myers-Perry black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic way to read gravitational multipole moments out of scattering amplitudes in any dimension. In four dimensions the method recovers the quadrupole and octupole moments of the Kerr solution from minimal couplings of massive vector and spin-3/2 fields. In five dimensions the same minimal couplings give a qualitatively different result: a massive vector field yields only a mass quadrupole while a massive antisymmetric tensor yields only a stress quadrupole. Direct computation of the stress-energy tensor shows that neither structure reproduces the multipoles of the Myers-Perry solution. This mismatch supplies an explicit example of the breakdown of spin universality once spacetime dimension exceeds four.

Core claim

A systematic extraction of multipole data from scattering amplitudes reveals that, in five dimensions, the quadrupolar structure generated by a minimally coupled massive vector field consists solely of a mass quadrupole, while the structure generated by a minimally coupled massive antisymmetric tensor consists solely of a stress quadrupole. Computation of the corresponding stress-energy tensor demonstrates that neither matches the multipolar structure of the Myers-Perry solution, furnishing a direct manifestation that spin universality fails in higher dimensions.

What carries the argument

The systematic procedure for extracting multipole moments from scattering amplitudes in arbitrary dimensions, together with the stress-energy tensor constructed from those amplitudes.

If this is right

  • Rotating black hole solutions in dimensions greater than four require non-minimal couplings in their effective field theory descriptions.
  • The additional infinite family of stress multipole moments that appear in higher dimensions must be generated separately from the usual mass and current moments.
  • Spin universality of gravitational multipoles is a four-dimensional phenomenon and does not hold in higher dimensions.
  • In four dimensions the most general rotating solution with spin-induced multipoles up to octupole order can be obtained by allowing non-minimal couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Effective field theories for higher-dimensional black holes are expected to contain additional higher-derivative or non-minimal operators that are not needed in four dimensions.
  • The mismatch suggests that matching the full classical solution may require either different field content or carefully tuned non-minimal couplings beyond minimal vector and tensor fields.
  • The method offers a concrete way to test whether proposed higher-dimensional black hole solutions can be reproduced from quantum field theory amplitudes.
  • The result raises the question of whether other known higher-dimensional black hole solutions exhibit similar mismatches with minimal couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The multipole moments read from the amplitudes of the chosen massive vector and antisymmetric tensor fields correspond to the classical multipolar structure that a rotating black hole solution must possess in five dimensions.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the mass and stress quadrupole moments of the five-dimensional Myers-Perry metric that agrees with the amplitude-derived values for either the vector or the antisymmetric tensor field would falsify the reported mismatch.

read the original abstract

We investigate the gravitational multipole structure derived from scattering amplitudes in both four- and higher-dimensional spacetimes, with particular focus on the five-dimensional case. We develop a systematic procedure to extract multipole data from scattering amplitudes in arbitrary dimensions. In four dimensions, only two independent multipole moments exist: mass and current moments. In this setting, we analyze the coupling of massive spin-1 and spin-3/2 fields to gravity, showing how the quadrupole and octupole structure of the Kerr solution arises from minimally coupled theories. We then extend the analysis to include non-minimal couplings, deriving the most general rotating solution with spin-induced multipoles up to octupole order. In higher dimensions, an additional infinite family of ``stress'' multipole moments arises. Focusing on the five-dimensional case, we consider both a massive vector and a massive antisymmetric tensor coupled to gravity, and show that the resulting quadrupolar structure is qualitatively different: while the vector field produces only a mass quadrupole, the antisymmetric tensor generates only a stress quadrupole. By computing the corresponding stress-energy tensor, we demonstrate that minimally coupled theories fail to reproduce the multipolar structure of the Myers-Perry solution. This provides a direct manifestation of the breakdown of spin universality in higher dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic procedure to extract gravitational multipole moments from scattering amplitudes in arbitrary dimensions. In 4D it shows that minimal couplings of massive spin-1 and spin-3/2 fields reproduce the quadrupole and octupole structure of Kerr, and derives the most general non-minimally coupled rotating solution up to octupole order. In 5D it considers minimal couplings of a massive vector (yielding only a mass quadrupole) and a massive antisymmetric tensor (yielding only a stress quadrupole), computes the associated stress-energy tensor, and concludes that neither reproduces the multipolar structure of the Myers-Perry solution, thereby exhibiting the breakdown of spin universality in higher dimensions.

Significance. If the 5D extraction procedure and the direct correspondence between amplitude-derived multipoles/stress-energy and the classical Myers-Perry multipoles are rigorously validated, the work supplies a concrete amplitude-based diagnostic of the failure of spin universality beyond four dimensions. The 4D sector reproduces known Kerr moments from minimal couplings and supplies an explicit non-minimal generalization, which are clear strengths. The introduction of an infinite family of stress multipoles in D>4 is a potentially useful organizing principle, but its utility hinges on the anchoring of these moments to asymptotic metric data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Five-dimensional case] The central claim that minimal couplings fail to reproduce the Myers-Perry multipolar structure rests on the mapping between the amplitude-derived mass and stress quadrupoles and the classical multipoles of the 5D Myers-Perry solution. The procedure is validated against Kerr in 4D, but the 5D extension defines additional stress multipoles whose precise relation to the asymptotic expansion coefficients of Myers-Perry (or to an effective source) is not independently derived; an explicit side-by-side comparison of the stress-energy tensor components extracted from the amplitudes versus those implied by the known Myers-Perry metric would be required to establish the reported mismatch.
  2. [Stress-energy tensor computation] The statement that the vector field produces only a mass quadrupole while the antisymmetric tensor produces only a stress quadrupole, and that this precludes reproduction of Myers-Perry, depends on the completeness of the stress-energy tensor computation. Any truncation or omission of higher-order or dimension-specific contributions in that computation would undermine the conclusion that the multipolar structures are qualitatively different.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] The notation distinguishing mass versus stress multipole moments would benefit from an explicit table or dictionary that lists the independent components in 4D versus 5D.
  2. [Four-dimensional analysis] A brief appendix or subsection summarizing the 4D validation steps (amplitudes, extraction formulas, and comparison to Kerr) would make the 5D extension easier to follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The 4D results are validated against known Kerr multipoles, and the 5D analysis follows the same systematic extraction procedure. We address the two major comments below with clarifications on the mapping and stress-energy computation, and we will incorporate an explicit comparison to strengthen the 5D section.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Five-dimensional case] The central claim that minimal couplings fail to reproduce the Myers-Perry multipolar structure rests on the mapping between the amplitude-derived mass and stress quadrupoles and the classical multipoles of the 5D Myers-Perry solution. The procedure is validated against Kerr in 4D, but the 5D extension defines additional stress multipoles whose precise relation to the asymptotic expansion coefficients of Myers-Perry (or to an effective source) is not independently derived; an explicit side-by-side comparison of the stress-energy tensor components extracted from the amplitudes versus those implied by the known Myers-Perry metric would be required to establish the reported mismatch.

    Authors: The multipole extraction procedure is constructed to be dimension-independent, with the 4D validation against Kerr serving as the anchor. In 5D the additional stress multipoles arise naturally from the decomposition of the metric perturbation in the asymptotic region and are extracted from the same three-point amplitudes used in 4D. The mismatch with Myers-Perry is therefore a direct consequence of the amplitude-derived moments. We agree that an explicit side-by-side tabulation of the stress-energy tensor components will make the comparison fully transparent and will add this comparison (including the relevant asymptotic coefficients of the Myers-Perry metric) as a new appendix in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Stress-energy tensor computation] The statement that the vector field produces only a mass quadrupole while the antisymmetric tensor produces only a stress quadrupole, and that this precludes reproduction of Myers-Perry, depends on the completeness of the stress-energy tensor computation. Any truncation or omission of higher-order or dimension-specific contributions in that computation would undermine the conclusion that the multipolar structures are qualitatively different.

    Authors: The stress-energy tensor is obtained from the on-shell three-point amplitudes via the standard Fourier-transform procedure that maps the amplitude to the effective source. All contributions up to the quadrupole order are retained; higher-order terms in the spin expansion do not enter the leading mass or stress quadrupoles. Dimension-specific factors (such as the 5D volume element and the decomposition into mass versus stress moments) are included explicitly. No truncations were performed that would alter the reported qualitative difference. We will add a short paragraph clarifying the order-by-order completeness of the computation to remove any ambiguity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Amplitude-derived multipoles independently compared to classical Myers-Perry solution

full rationale

The paper develops a systematic procedure for extracting multipole moments from scattering amplitudes of massive fields coupled to gravity. This procedure is validated in four dimensions by reproducing the known quadrupole and octupole structure of the Kerr solution from minimal couplings. In five dimensions, the same procedure applied to massive vector and antisymmetric tensor fields yields specific mass and stress quadrupoles, respectively. The corresponding stress-energy tensors are then computed and shown not to match the multipolar structure of the Myers-Perry solution. Since the classical multipoles of Myers-Perry are independently known from the exact solution metric, and the amplitude computation is based on quantum field theory Feynman rules, the mismatch is a genuine comparison rather than a definitional equivalence. No step reduces the output to the input by construction or via self-citation load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that scattering amplitudes encode classical multipoles and that the chosen matter fields test minimal coupling adequately. No explicit free parameters are mentioned. Relies on standard GR and QFT background.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Scattering amplitudes of fields coupled to gravity encode the multipole moments of the corresponding classical gravitational solutions
    This underpins the entire systematic procedure for extraction in arbitrary dimensions.
invented entities (1)
  • stress multipole moments no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the additional infinite family of multipoles that arise in higher-dimensional spacetimes beyond mass and current moments
    Introduced to explain the qualitative difference in 5D quadrupolar structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1584 out tokens · 85666 ms · 2026-05-08T16:29:35.868765+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kerr,Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,Phys

    R.P. Kerr,Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,Phys. Rev. Lett.11(1963) 237

    1963

  2. [2]

    Myers and M.J

    R.C. Myers and M.J. Perry,Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,Annals Phys. 172(1986) 304

    1986

  3. [3]

    A rotating black ring in five dimensions

    R. Emparan and H.S. Reall,A Rotating black ring solution in five-dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 101101 [hep-th/0110260]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Elvang and P

    H. Elvang and P. Figueras,Black Saturn,JHEP05(2007) 050 [hep-th/0701035]

    work page arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Emparan and R.C

    R. Emparan and R.C. Myers,Instability of ultra-spinning black holes,JHEP09(2003) 025 [hep-th/0308056]

    work page arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Elvang, R

    H. Elvang, R. Emparan and A. Virmani,Dynamics and stability of black rings,JHEP12 (2006) 074 [hep-th/0608076]

    work page arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Geroch,Multipole moments

    R.P. Geroch,Multipole moments. I. Flat space,J. Math. Phys.11(1970) 1955

    1970

  8. [8]

    Geroch,Multipole moments

    R.P. Geroch,Multipole moments. II. Curved space,J. Math. Phys.11(1970) 2580

    1970

  9. [9]

    Hansen,Multipole moments of stationary space-times,J

    R.O. Hansen,Multipole moments of stationary space-times,J. Math. Phys.15(1974) 46

    1974

  10. [10]

    Thorne,Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,Rev

    K.S. Thorne,Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.52(1980) 299

    1980

  11. [11]

    Gambino, P

    C. Gambino, P. Pani and F. Riccioni,Rotating metrics and new multipole moments from scattering amplitudes in arbitrary dimensions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 124018 [2403.16574]. – 19 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Vaidya,Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,Phys

    V. Vaidya,Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 024017 [1410.5348]

    work page arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings

    J. Vines,Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 084002 [1709.06016]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,JHEP11(2021) 070 [1709.04891]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim and S. Lee,The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,JHEP04(2019) 156 [1812.08752]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov and J. Vines,Scattering of Spinning Black Holes from Exponentiated Soft Factors,JHEP09(2019) 056 [1812.06895]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Black-hole scattering with general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov and J. Vines,Black-hole scattering with general spin directions from minimal-coupling amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 104024 [1906.10071]

    work page arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Kerr black holes as elementary particles,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang and D. O’Connell,Kerr black holes as elementary particles, JHEP01(2020) 046 [1906.10100]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Maybee, D

    B. Maybee, D. O’Connell and J. Vines,Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,JHEP12(2019) 156 [1906.09260]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen and M. Zeng,Spinning black hole binary dynamics, scattering amplitudes, and effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 065014 [2005.03071]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Aoude and A

    R. Aoude and A. Ochirov,Classical observables from coherent-spin amplitudes,JHEP10 (2021) 008 [2108.01649]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Alessio,Kerr binary dynamics from minimal coupling and double copy,JHEP04(2024) 058 [2303.12784]

    F. Alessio,Kerr binary dynamics from minimal coupling and double copy,JHEP04(2024) 058 [2303.12784]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Kosmopoulos and A

    D. Kosmopoulos and A. Luna,Quadratic-in-spin Hamiltonian atO(G 2) from scattering amplitudes,JHEP07(2021) 037 [2102.10137]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Liu, R.A

    Z. Liu, R.A. Porto and Z. Yang,Spin Effects in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Post-Minkowskian Conservative Dynamics,JHEP06(2021) 012 [2102.10059]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Chen, M.-Z

    W.-M. Chen, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang and J.-W. Kim,The 2PM Hamiltonian for binary Kerr to quartic in spin,JHEP08(2022) 148 [2111.13639]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Menezes and M

    G. Menezes and M. Sergola,NLO deflections for spinning particles and Kerr black holes, JHEP10(2022) 105 [2205.11701]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban and F. Teng,Binary Dynamics through the Fifth Power of Spin at O(G2),Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 201402 [2203.06202]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Bautista,Dynamics for super-extremal Kerr binary systems at O(G2),Phys

    Y.F. Bautista,Dynamics for super-extremal Kerr binary systems at O(G2),Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 084036 [2304.04287]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Bohnenblust, L

    L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson and P. Pichini,Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,JHEP07(2025) 261 [2410.23271]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Chen and T

    G. Chen and T. Wang,Dynamics of spinning binary at 2PM,JHEP12(2025) 213 [2406.09086]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Akpinar, F

    D. Akpinar, F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, M.S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Spinning black hole – 20 – scattering atO(G 3S2): Casimir terms, radial action and hidden symmetry,JHEP03(2025) 126 [2407.19005]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Febres Cordero, M

    F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, G. Lin, M.S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 021601 [2205.07357]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Jakobsen, G

    G.U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and Y. Xu,Conservative Scattering of Spinning Black Holes at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 151401 [2306.01714]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Jakobsen and G

    G.U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull,Conservative and Radiative Dynamics of Spinning Bodies at Third Post-Minkowskian Order Using Worldline Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(2022) 141102 [2201.07778]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Damgaard, J

    P.H. Damgaard, J. Hoogeveen, A. Luna and J. Vines,Scattering angles in Kerr metrics, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 124030 [2208.11028]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    A. Luna, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell and A. Ross,Observables from the spinning eikonal, JHEP08(2024) 045 [2312.09960]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr – 104 – Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations,

    R. Gonzo and C. Shi,Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 221401 [2405.09687]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Akpinar, V

    D. Akpinar, V. del Duca and R. Gonzo,Spinning self-force EFT: 1SF waveform recursion relation and Compton scattering,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 084014 [2504.02025]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Alaverdian, Z

    M. Alaverdian, Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner et al., Observables and unconstrained spin tensor dynamics in general relativity from scattering amplitudes,JHEP12(2025) 054 [2503.03739]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Akpinar, F

    D. Akpinar, F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, A. Smirnov and M. Zeng,First Look at Quartic-in-Spin Binary Dynamics at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) 041602 [2502.08961]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Akpinar,Scattering gravitons off general spinning compact objects to O(G2S4),Phys

    D. Akpinar,Scattering gravitons off general spinning compact objects to O(G2S4),Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 045003 [2511.10280]

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Gatica and C.R.T

    J.P. Gatica and C.R.T. Jones,Classical spin transitions and absorptive scattering,JHEP04 (2026) 186 [2511.19601]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Hartle,Slowly rotating relativistic stars

    J.B. Hartle,Slowly rotating relativistic stars. 1. Equations of structure,Astrophys. J.150 (1967) 1005

    1967

  44. [44]

    Hartle and K.S

    J.B. Hartle and K.S. Thorne,Slowly Rotating Relativistic Stars. II. Models for Neutron Stars and Supermassive Stars,Astrophys. J.153(1968) 807

    1968

  45. [45]

    Bianchi, C

    M. Bianchi, C. Gambino, P. Pani and F. Riccioni,Source multipoles and energy-momentum tensors for spinning black holes and other compact objects in arbitrary dimensions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084013 [2412.01771]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Israel,Source of the Kerr metric,Phys

    W. Israel,Source of the Kerr metric,Phys. Rev. D2(1970) 641

    1970

  47. [47]

    Bjerrum-Bohr, J.F

    N.E.J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J.F. Donoghue and B.R. Holstein,Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 084005 [hep-th/0211071]

    work page arXiv 2003

  48. [48]

    Kosower, B

    D.A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,JHEP02(2019) 137 [1811.10950]. – 21 –

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Bianchi, C

    M. Bianchi, C. Gambino, F. Riccioni and V. Zevola,Probing the multipolar structure of Myers-Perry black holes with scattering amplitudes,JHEP08(2025) 151 [2505.04800]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Bianchi, C

    M. Bianchi, C. Gambino and F. Riccioni,A Rutherford-like formula for scattering off Kerr-Newman BHs and subleading corrections,JHEP08(2023) 188 [2306.08969]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Bjerrum-Bohr, B.R

    N.E.J. Bjerrum-Bohr, B.R. Holstein, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,Graviton-Photon Scattering, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 064008 [1410.4148]

    work page arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Gherghetta and W

    T. Gherghetta and W. Ke,Effective interactions and on-shell recursion relation for massive spin 3/2,JHEP04(2025) 014 [2408.16065]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Donoghue, B.R

    J.F. Donoghue, B.R. Holstein, B. Garbrecht and T. Konstandin,Quantum corrections to the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om and Kerr-Newman metrics,Phys. Lett. B529(2002) 132 [hep-th/0112237]

    work page arXiv 2002

  54. [54]

    Holstein and J.F

    B.R. Holstein and J.F. Donoghue,Classical physics and quantum loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 201602 [hep-th/0405239]

    work page arXiv 2004

  55. [55]

    Bjerrum-Bohr, P.H

    N.E.J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P.H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 171601 [1806.04920]

    work page arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Mougiakakos and P

    S. Mougiakakos and P. Vanhove,Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric from scattering amplitudes in various dimensions,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 026001 [2010.08882]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    D’Onofrio, F

    S. D’Onofrio, F. Fragomeno, C. Gambino and F. Riccioni,The Reissner-Nordstr¨ om-Tangherlini solution from scattering amplitudes of charged scalars, JHEP09(2022) 013 [2207.05841]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Cangemi, M

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini and E. Skvortsov,Kerr Black Holes From Massive Higher-Spin Gauge Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 221401 [2212.06120]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Cangemi, M

    L. Cangemi, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, A. Ochirov, P. Pichini and E. Skvortsov,From higher-spin gauge interactions to Compton amplitudes for root-Kerr,JHEP09(2024) 196 [2311.14668]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Chiodaroli, M

    M. Chiodaroli, M. Gunaydin, H. Johansson and R. Roiban,Spinor-helicity formalism for massive and massless amplitudes in five dimensions,JHEP02(2023) 040 [2202.08257]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Pokraka, S

    A. Pokraka, S. Rajan, L. Ren, A. Volovich and W.W. Zhao,Five-dimensional spinor helicity for all masses and spins,2405.09533

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Alessio, P

    F. Alessio, P. Di Vecchia, M. Firrotta and P. Pichini,Searching for Kerr in string amplitudes,2506.15529

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Gambino, F

    C. Gambino, F. Riccioni and V.S. Sanchis,The gyromagnetic factor of charged rotating black holes in various dimensions from scattering amplitudes,JHEP03(2026) 106 [2509.08456]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Chong, M

    Z.W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C.N. Pope,General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 161301 [hep-th/0506029]

    work page arXiv 2005

  65. [65]

    Deshpande and O

    R. Deshpande and O. Lunin,Rotating Einstein-Maxwell black holes in odd dimensions, JHEP06(2025) 066 [2411.01795]. – 22 –

    work page arXiv 2025