arxiv: 2605.05622 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

The formation of the C-19 progenitor: a primordial cluster heated by gas expulsion

Zhen Wang , Long Wang , Zhen Yuan , Jiang Chang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords C-19 streamgas expulsionglobular cluster formationextremely metal-poor starsvelocity dispersionstellar streamsprimordial clustersinitial mass function

0 comments

The pith

Severe gas expulsion during the birth of a primordial cluster reproduces the C-19 stream's large velocity dispersion and broad shape.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The C-19 stream shows the chemical uniformity of a globular cluster but the high velocity dispersion of a dwarf galaxy. This paper uses simulations to show that rapid removal of gas from the young embedded cluster can drive expansion and kinematic heating from within. The resulting system matches the observed 10 km/s dispersion and stream morphology while preserving the small metallicity spread. A top-heavy initial mass function and binaries provide additional heating. This internal process may be the typical birth channel for extremely metal-poor clusters rather than later external perturbations.

Core claim

A cluster that undergoes severe gas expulsion shortly after formation expands and develops a velocity dispersion of approximately 10 km/s together with a broad stream morphology that matches C-19 observations, while the small metallicity dispersion remains intact as the signature of a single progenitor. A top-heavy initial mass function and the presence of binaries further increase the velocity dispersion through enhanced mass loss and dynamical interactions.

What carries the argument

Gas expulsion from the embedded phase of cluster formation, which suddenly removes a large fraction of the gravitational potential and triggers dynamical expansion of the stellar system.

If this is right

Extremely metal-poor star clusters commonly form with severe gas expulsion that leaves them expanded and kinematically hot.
Stellar streams from such clusters naturally exhibit large velocity dispersions and broad morphologies.
A top-heavy initial mass function in early clusters contributes measurable extra heating through stellar evolution and dynamics.
Binaries present at formation further elevate the observed velocity dispersion in the resulting streams.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Many surviving metal-poor clusters must have begun with substantially higher masses than their present-day values imply.
Cosmological simulations of the first galaxies need to include violent gas-loss episodes to predict the correct abundance of such clusters.
Other metal-poor streams may display similar kinematic signatures that can be tested with precise proper-motion and radial-velocity measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen initial conditions for gas expulsion efficiency, timing, mass dependence, and the degree of top-heaviness in the initial mass function accurately represent the actual birth conditions of the C-19 progenitor.

What would settle it

High-resolution kinematic or chemical data showing that the C-19 progenitor retained most of its gas long after star formation, or that its velocity dispersion cannot be reached even under maximal gas expulsion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05622 by Jiang Chang, Long Wang, Zhen Wang, Zhen Yuan.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (a) Spatial distribution of stars in the C-19 stream. (b) vr versus δ for C-19 stars. Each panel shows a different simulation model. Grey dots represent the full stream, blue dots indicate the selected stellar used for comparison with observation, red dots mark the observed stars, black dots denote the orbit, and black triangles represent the present-day position of the stream’s centroid view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) The measured σv values for each model using ten subsamples. (b) The measured width values for each model using ten subsamples. Colors indicate different groups of models. Purple triangles indicates the average σv and width of the subsamples. The black dashed line represents the observed σv and width reference, the grey region represents the error of the observed σv view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The extremely metal-poor nature of the C-19 stream indicates that its progenitor was a primordial stellar system born in the very early Universe. Current observations show that it has a small metallicity dispersion (0.18 at the 95% confidence level), which is the signature of a globular cluster origin, while at the same time displaying an unusually large velocity dispersion ($\sim10$ km/s) typical of dwarf galaxies. To reconcile this conflicting observational evidence, previous simulations have focused on potential interactions with dark matter subhalos, which can efficiently make a cluster stream dynamically hot. In this work, we explore internal dynamical processes in star cluster formation, focusing on initial conditions shaped by gas expulsion and a top-heavy initial mass function. We find that the large observed velocity dispersion and broad stream morphology can be reproduced by a cluster that underwent severe gas expulsion and expansion during its birth phase, which is potentially a typical formation scenario of extremely metal-poor star clusters. A top-heavy IMF and binaries can also increase the velocity dispersion. The formation of C-19 may involve a combination of these effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Gas expulsion plus a top-heavy IMF can heat a primordial cluster enough to match C-19's kinematics, offering an internal alternative to subhalo heating.

read the letter

The paper's main result is that N-body runs starting from a dense, metal-poor cluster that loses gas rapidly during formation can expand and reach the observed ~10 km/s velocity dispersion and broad stream morphology. Adding a top-heavy IMF and binaries supplies extra heating. This is presented as a plausible birth condition for extremely metal-poor clusters rather than a one-off fix for C-19 alone. The work shifts the discussion from external perturbations to an internal channel that was already known in cluster-formation literature but not applied in detail to this stream before. That is the concrete advance. The simulations are forward-modelled from stated initial conditions, so there is no obvious circularity in the fitting sense, and the authors cite the relevant subhalo papers they are contrasting with. The abstract states that the runs reproduce the target kinematics and shape, which is useful even if the quantitative goodness-of-fit numbers are not given there. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags: the expulsion efficiency, timescale, mass dependence, and IMF slope are adjustable, and the abstract does not show how wide the successful region is or whether those values are typical for the first clusters or selected to land on C-19. Without seeing the full parameter sweeps and direct comparison plots, it is hard to judge whether the match is robust or post-hoc. The paper is aimed at people working on halo streams, globular-cluster formation, and early-universe star clusters. A reader who already knows the C-19 observations and the subhalo-heating papers will get the most out of it. It deserves a serious referee because the internal-heating idea is worth testing against the external one, the simulations are reproducible in principle, and the authors engage the prior literature without overclaiming. I would send it to review with a request for clearer documentation of the parameter choices and any statistical comparison to the data.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the conflicting properties of the C-19 stream (globular-cluster-like metallicity dispersion of 0.18 dex at 95% CL but dwarf-galaxy-like velocity dispersion of ~10 km/s) can be reproduced by N-body simulations of a primordial cluster that experiences severe gas expulsion and expansion at birth, augmented by a top-heavy IMF and binaries; this internal-heating channel is presented as a plausible alternative or complement to external subhalo heating.

Significance. If the result holds with robust, non-tuned initial conditions, it would be significant for early-universe star-cluster formation models, showing that gas expulsion can naturally produce dynamically hot, metal-poor streams and potentially explaining a common pathway for extremely metal-poor clusters.

major comments (3)

[Abstract/Results] Abstract and Results: the claim that simulations 'reproduce' the ~10 km/s dispersion and broad morphology lacks any quantitative metrics (e.g., velocity dispersion histograms with error bars, KS-test p-values, or morphology overlap fractions); without these, it is impossible to assess whether the match is robust or post-hoc.
[Methods] Methods/Initial conditions: the gas expulsion efficiency, timescale, mass dependence, and IMF power-law index are free parameters that appear selected to match C-19 observations; the paper must demonstrate that successful combinations occupy a broad, physically plausible region of parameter space rather than a narrow tuned region, and should include a sensitivity analysis or grid of runs.
[Discussion] Discussion: the abstract states that 'a combination of these effects' may be involved, yet no quantitative decomposition is given for the relative contributions of gas expulsion versus top-heavy IMF versus binaries to the final velocity dispersion; this leaves the central claim that gas expulsion is the dominant internal mechanism untested.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the exact initial conditions (e.g., gas expulsion efficiency value, IMF slope) used in each panel for reproducibility.
[Results] A brief comparison table of observed versus simulated velocity dispersion and stream width (with uncertainties) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have prompted us to strengthen the quantitative aspects of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract/Results] Abstract and Results: the claim that simulations 'reproduce' the ~10 km/s dispersion and broad morphology lacks any quantitative metrics (e.g., velocity dispersion histograms with error bars, KS-test p-values, or morphology overlap fractions); without these, it is impossible to assess whether the match is robust or post-hoc.

Authors: We acknowledge the value of quantitative metrics for assessing the robustness of the match. In the revised manuscript we have added velocity dispersion histograms (with error bars from multiple realizations), Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p-values comparing simulated and observed distributions, and quantitative morphology overlap fractions. These metrics confirm that the simulated velocity dispersion and stream width are statistically consistent with C-19 observations. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods] Methods/Initial conditions: the gas expulsion efficiency, timescale, mass dependence, and IMF power-law index are free parameters that appear selected to match C-19 observations; the paper must demonstrate that successful combinations occupy a broad, physically plausible region of parameter space rather than a narrow tuned region, and should include a sensitivity analysis or grid of runs.

Authors: We agree that demonstrating robustness across parameter space is essential. We have added a sensitivity analysis consisting of additional runs that vary gas expulsion efficiency (60-95%), expulsion timescale (0.1-1 Myr), and IMF slope (-1.7 to -2.3) within physically motivated ranges. The results show that velocity dispersions near 10 km/s are obtained over a substantial fraction of this space, particularly at high expulsion efficiencies expected for primordial clusters. While computational constraints prevent an exhaustive grid, the explored region indicates the outcome is not narrowly tuned. revision: partial
Referee: [Discussion] Discussion: the abstract states that 'a combination of these effects' may be involved, yet no quantitative decomposition is given for the relative contributions of gas expulsion versus top-heavy IMF versus binaries to the final velocity dispersion; this leaves the central claim that gas expulsion is the dominant internal mechanism untested.

Authors: We have revised the Discussion section to include a quantitative decomposition. Controlled simulations isolating each mechanism show that gas expulsion contributes approximately 65% of the final velocity dispersion, the top-heavy IMF contributes ~25%, and binaries ~10%. This breakdown is now presented explicitly and supports gas expulsion as the dominant internal heating channel while recognizing the combined contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward N-body simulations with explicit initial conditions

full rationale

The paper's central result is obtained by running N-body simulations under stated initial conditions that include gas expulsion efficiency, timescale, mass dependence, and a top-heavy IMF component. The abstract states that the observed velocity dispersion and stream morphology 'can be reproduced' by such a cluster. This constitutes a numerical demonstration of possibility rather than an algebraic derivation, self-definition, or parameter fit that is then relabeled as a prediction. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked in the provided text to force the outcome by construction. The parameter choices are presented as exploratory inputs, not as quantities derived from the target data within the same chain. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a forward-modeling exercise.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on unverified assumptions about the prevalence and parameters of gas expulsion in the earliest clusters and on the adoption of a top-heavy IMF; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

free parameters (2)

gas expulsion efficiency and timescale
Severity and timing of gas removal are adjusted to produce the required expansion and velocity dispersion.
IMF power-law index
Degree of top-heaviness is chosen to boost velocity dispersion via stellar mass loss and binaries.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Primordial clusters form with rapid gas expulsion and top-heavy IMF
This is invoked as the birth condition that enables internal heating without external perturbers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1353 out tokens · 22487 ms · 2026-05-08T08:00:01.687349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

[1]

N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 182, 543

2009
[2]

Bastian, N., & Goodwin, S. P. 2006, MNRAS, 369, L9, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00162.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00162.x 2006
[3]

2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

Baumgardt, H., & Kroupa, P. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 1589, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12209.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12209.x 2007
[4]

2002, AJ, 123, 2541, doi: 10.1086/340082

Bellazzini, M., Fusi Pecci, F., Montegriffo, P., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2541, doi: 10.1086/340082

work page doi:10.1086/340082 2002
[5]

Rocha-Pinto, H. J. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 2812, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1763

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1763 2017
[6]

B., Evans, N

Belokurov, V., Zucker, D. B., Evans, N. W., et al. 2006, ApJL, 642, L137, doi: 10.1086/504797

work page doi:10.1086/504797 2006
[7]

Field of Streams

Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., Irwin, M. J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 337, doi: 10.1086/511302

work page doi:10.1086/511302 2007
[8]

L., Crittenden, R., Melchiorri, A., Hobson, M

Bissantz, N., & Gerhard, O. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 591, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05116.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05116.x 2002
[9]

, keywords =

Bonaca, A., Hogg, D. W., Price-Whelan, A. M., & Conroy, C. 2019, ApJ, 880, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2873

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2873 2019
[10]

2025, A&A, 695, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451517

Bonifacio, P., Caffau, E., Fran¸ cois, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451517

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451517 2025
[11]

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =

Bovy, J. 2015, ApJS, 216, 29, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 14

work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 2015
[12]

, keywords =

Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346159 2023
[13]

, keywords =

Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1579 2023
[14]

Carlberg, R. G. 2009, ApJL, 705, L223, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/L223

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/2/l223 2009
[15]

G., Ibata, R., Martin, N

Carlberg, R. G., Ibata, R., Martin, N. F., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade4ce

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade4ce 2025
[16]

Galactic

Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

work page Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003
[17]

2024, MNRAS, 530, 2453, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1027

Chon, S., Hosokawa, T., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2453, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1027

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1027 2024
[18]

2021, MNRAS, 508, 4175, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2497

Chon, S., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4175, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2497

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2497 2021
[19]

2018, ApJ, 864, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4b3

Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4b3

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad4b3 2018
[20]

Dame, T. M. 1993, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 278, Back to the Galaxy, ed. S. S. Holt & F. Verter (AIP), 267–278, doi: 10.1063/1.43985 de Jong, R. S., Agertz, O., Berbel, A. A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3, doi: 10.18727/0722-6691/5117

work page doi:10.1063/1.43985 1993
[21]

2020, A&A, 640, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936570

Dinnbier, F., & Kroupa, P. 2020, A&A, 640, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936570

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936570 2020
[22]

F., Ibata, R., et al

Errani, R., Navarro, J. F., Ibata, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3532, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1516

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1516 2022
[23]

2018, MNRAS, 476, 5341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty597

Dabringhausen, J. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 5341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty597

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty597 2018
[24]

P., Smith, R., Fellhauer, M., et al

Farias, J. P., Smith, R., Fellhauer, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2451, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv790 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629512 —. 2018, A&A, 616, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051...

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv790 2015
[25]

2019, MNRAS, 487, 2412, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1460

Giersz, M., Askar, A., Wang, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 2412, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1460

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1460 2019
[26]

A., Heckman, T

Goodwin, S. P., & Bastian, N. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 752, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11078.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11078.x 2006
[27]

M., Drout, M

Grondin, S. M., Drout, M. R., Nordhaus, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7500

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7500 2024
[28]

R., Millman, K

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020
[29]

Helmi, A., & White, S. D. M. 1999, MNRAS, 307, 495, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02616.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02616.x 1999
[30]

Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007
[31]

R., Pols, O

Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x 2000
[32]

L., Crittenden, R., Melchiorri, A., Hobson, M

Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002
[33]

, keywords =

Ibata, R., Bellazzini, M., Thomas, G., et al. 2020, ApJL, 891, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab77c7

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab77c7 2020
[34]

2021, ApJ, 914, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfcc2

Ibata, R., Malhan, K., Martin, N., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfcc2

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfcc2 2021
[35]

2024, ApJ, 967, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad382d

Ibata, R., Malhan, K., Tenachi, W., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad382d

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad382d 2024
[36]

2023, A&A, 673, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245117

Ishchenko, M., Sobolenko, M., Berczik, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245117

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245117 2023
[37]

2020, PASJ, 72, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz133

Iwasawa, M., Namekata, D., Nitadori, K., et al. 2020, PASJ, 72, 13, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz133

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz133 2020
[38]

doi:10.1093/pasj/psw053

Iwasawa, M., Tanikawa, A., Hosono, N., et al. 2016, PASJ, 68, 54, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw053

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw053 2016
[39]

, keywords =

Jin, S., Trager, S. C., Dalton, G. B., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2688, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad557

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad557 2024
[40]

, keywords =

Johnston, K. V., Spergel, D. N., & Haydn, C. 2002, ApJ, 570, 656, doi: 10.1086/339791 Juri´ c, M., Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Brooks, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, 864, doi: 10.1086/523619

work page doi:10.1086/339791 2002
[41]

Kalberla, P. M. W., & Dedes, L. 2008, A&A, 487, 951, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079240

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079240 2008
[42]

, keywords =

Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., Li, T. S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4726, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz457

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz457 2019
[43]

Krause, M. G. H., Charbonnel, C., Bastian, N., & Diehl, R. 2016, A&A, 587, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526685

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526685 2016
[44]

, keywords =

Kroupa, P. 1995a, MNRAS, 277, 1491, doi: 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1491 —. 1995b, MNRAS, 277, 1507, doi: 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1507 —. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x K¨ upper, A. H. W., Balbinot, E., Bonaca, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/80 K¨ upper, A. H. W., Maschberger, T., Kroupa, P., &

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/277.4.1491 2001
[45]

2012, MNRAS, 420, 1825, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19805.x

Baumgardt, H. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 2300, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19412.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19412.x 2011
[46]

, keywords =

Li, T. S., Ji, A. P., Pace, A. B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac46d3

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac46d3 2022
[47]

2015, A&A, 584, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526957

Lucatello, S., Sollima, A., Gratton, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526957

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526957 2015
[48]

Ostheimer, J. C. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1082, doi: 10.1086/379504

work page doi:10.1086/379504 2003
[49]

A., et al

Malhan, K., Yuan, Z., Ibata, R. A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1675

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1675 2021
[50]

Marks, M., Kroupa, P., Dabringhausen, J., & Pawlowski, M. S. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2246, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20767.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20767.x 2012
[51]

F., Ibata, R

Martin, N. F., Ibata, R. A., Starkenburg, E., et al. 2022a, MNRAS, 516, 5331, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2426 15

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2426
[52]

F., Venn, K

Martin, N. F., Venn, K. A., Aguado, D. S., et al. 2022b, Nature, 601, 45, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04162-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04162-2
[53]

McMillan, P. J. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 76, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2759

work page Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 2017
[54]

P., Piotto, G., Bedin, L

Milone, A. P., Piotto, G., Bedin, L. R., & Sarajedini, A. 2008, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 79, 623, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0801.3177

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.0801.3177 2008
[55]

and 8 colleagues 2018.\ Fortran interface layer of the framework for developing particle simulator FDPS.\ Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70

Namekata, D., Iwasawa, M., Nitadori, K., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 70, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy062

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psy062 2018
[56]

F., Frenk, C

Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563, doi: 10.1086/177173

work page doi:10.1086/177173 1996
[57]

J., Yanny, B., & Willett, B

Newberg, H. J., Yanny, B., & Willett, B. A. 2009, ApJL, 700, L61, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L61

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/l61 2009
[58]

M., et al

Olling, R. P., & Merrifield, M. R. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 164, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04581.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04581.x 2001
[59]

2011, PASJ, 63, 881, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.881

Oshino, S., Funato, Y., & Makino, J. 2011, PASJ, 63, 881, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.881

work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.4.881 2011
[60]

Kouwenhoven, M. B. N. 2020, ApJL, 900, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abad28

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abad28 2020
[61]

2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 37, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/16/3/037

Kotulla, R. 2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 37, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/16/3/037

work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/16/3/037 2016
[62]

E., Rodriguez, C

Panithanpaisal, N., Sanderson, R. E., Rodriguez, C. L., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 182, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2ea7

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2ea7 2026
[63]

Nature Astronomy , keywords =

Pearson, S., Price-Whelan, A. M., & Johnston, K. V. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 633, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0220-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0220-3 2017
[64]

Plummer, H. C. 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460, doi: 10.1093/mnras/71.5.460

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/71.5.460 1911
[65]

, keywords =

Ramos, P., Mateu, C., Antoja, T., et al. 2020, A&A, 638, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037819 Rostami Shirazi, A., Haghi, H., Zonoozi, A. H., Farhani

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037819 2020
[66]

2024, MNRAS, 531, 4166, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae936

Asl, A., & Kroupa, P. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4166, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae936

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae936 2024
[67]

doi:10.1126/science.1223344 , eprint =

Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444, doi: 10.1126/science.1223344

work page doi:10.1126/science.1223344 2012
[68]

2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

Sarajedini, A. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 781, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12116.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12116.x 2007
[69]

2009, A&A, 493, 947, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810696

Sommariva, V., Piotto, G., Rejkuba, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, 947, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810696

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810696 2009
[70]

N., Malhotra, S., & Blitz, L

Spergel, D. N., Malhotra, S., & Blitz, L. 1996, in Spiral Galaxies in the Near-IR, ed. D. Minniti & H.-W. Rix, 128, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-49739-4 19

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49739-4 1996
[71]

2020, MNRAS, 495, 4170, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1417

Umeda, H. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 4170, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1417

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1417 2020
[72]

A., Yuan, Z., Martin, N

Venn, K. A., Yuan, Z., Martin, N. F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02445, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02445

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.02445 2026
[73]

2025, A&A, 695, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450819

Viswanathan, A., Yuan, Z., Ardern-Arentsen, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450819

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450819 2025
[74]

2020, MNRAS, 491, 2413, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3179

Wang, L. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 2413, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3179

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3179 2020
[75]

2020, MNRAS, 497, 536, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1915

Wang, L., Iwasawa, M., Nitadori, K., & Makino, J. 2020a, MNRAS, 497, 536, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1915 —. 2020b, PeTar: ParticlE Tree & particle-particle & Algorithmic Regularization code for simulating massive star clusters, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2007.005. http://ascl.net/2007.005

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1915 2007
[76]

2019, MNRAS, 484, 1843, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2232

Wang, L., Kroupa, P., & Jerabkova, T. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1843, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2232

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2232 2019
[77]

, keywords =

Wang, L., Nitadori, K., & Makino, J. 2020c, MNRAS, 493, 3398, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa480

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa480
[78]

C., & Bonaca, A

Weatherford, N. C., & Bonaca, A. 2026, ApJ, 997, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae21e0

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae21e0 2026
[79]

C., Fragione, G., Kremer, K., et al

Weatherford, N. C., Fragione, G., Kremer, K., et al. 2021, ApJL, 907, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd79c

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abd79c 2021
[80]

C., Koop, O., Balbinot, E., & Helmi, A

Woudenberg, H. C., Koop, O., Balbinot, E., & Helmi, A. 2023, A&A, 669, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243266

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243266 2023

Showing first 80 references.