pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05822 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Investigating the Relationship Between Physical Properties and Spatial Irregularities at Coronal Hole Boundaries

Nawin Ngampoopun , David M. Long , Lucie M. Green , Stephanie L. Yardley , Alexander W. James , Emily I. Mason , Stephan G. Heinemann , Vadim M. Uritsky
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords coronal holescoronal hole boundariesdifferential emission measuremagnetic reconnectionsolar magnetic fieldsolar windboundary irregularities
0
0 comments X

The pith

Leading coronal hole boundaries show higher temperature, stronger unipolar fields, and smoother edges than trailing boundaries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This case study examines the boundary of one large low-latitude coronal hole by deriving plasma temperatures via differential emission measure analysis and quantifying edge irregularities with correlation dimension mapping. The leading boundary registers a slightly higher average temperature, a stronger and more unipolar magnetic field, and a smoother contour than the trailing boundary. The authors link these contrasts to the leading side consisting of large, well-organized coronal loops while the trailing side consists of dispersed, randomly oriented small magnetic bipoles. They conclude that the local magnetic configuration and the character of reconnection at the open-closed interface set the observable properties of the boundary.

Core claim

In this coronal hole the leading boundary has a slightly higher average plasma temperature, is associated with a stronger and more unipolar magnetic field, and has a smoother boundary line than the trailing counterpart, as measured by differential emission measure and correlation dimension mapping. These differences are hypothesised to be direct consequences of the local magnetic field configurations: the leading boundary corresponds to large, well-organised coronal loops and the trailing boundary to more dispersed, randomly orientated small magnetic bipoles. The surrounding magnetic field structure and the nature of magnetic reconnection are therefore proposed to influence the properties of

What carries the argument

Leading-versus-trailing boundary comparison, with differential emission measure supplying temperature and field strength and correlation dimension mapping supplying a quantitative measure of spatial irregularity.

If this is right

  • Boundary smoothness increases where the surrounding magnetic loops are large and coherently organized.
  • Average plasma temperature at the boundary is elevated on the side with stronger unipolar fields.
  • The efficiency and outcome of magnetic reconnection at the interface depend on whether the field consists of large loops or small random bipoles.
  • Solar wind release sites are therefore expected to differ systematically between the leading and trailing edges of the same coronal hole.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the asymmetry proves general, global solar wind models should treat coronal holes as having distinct leading and trailing outflow properties.
  • Changes in the large-scale solar magnetic field across the activity cycle could alter the typical balance of organized versus dispersed boundaries and therefore the average solar wind characteristics.
  • Targeted simulations of reconnection between a large loop system and an open field versus many small bipoles would provide an independent test of the proposed mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed differences in temperature, magnetic field strength, and boundary smoothness are produced by the differing magnetic loop organizations rather than by projection effects or the particular evolutionary history of this one coronal hole.

What would settle it

A second coronal hole whose leading and trailing boundaries have nearly identical magnetic loop scales and orientations yet still display the same temperature, field, and smoothness differences would undermine the claimed causal link.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05822 by Alexander W. James, David M. Long, Emily I. Mason, Lucie M. Green, Nawin Ngampoopun, Stephan G. Heinemann, Stephanie L. Yardley, Vadim M. Uritsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: SDO observations of a low-latitude coronal hole on 2018 November 1 at 04:00:28 UT. Panel a displays the processed and PSF-corrected AIA 193 ˚A (see Section 2).The white and red arrows indicate the filament channel and coronal cell structure, respectively. Panel b shows the CH boundary derived using the CATCH algorithm in a red contour, with the uncertainties of the boundary shown in blue. Panel c correspon… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Global magnetic field configuration from the PFSS extrapolation. (a) The ADAPT/HMI magnetogram used as input for the PFSS extrapolation, saturated at ±50 G. (b) The magnetic field polarity at the source surface of 2 R⊙, saturated at ±0.5 G. The blue line represents the heliospheric current sheet, and the location of helmet streamers (HS) and pseudostreamers (PS) are labelled. (c) The footpoints of positive… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: DEM of the CH plasma on 2018 November 1 at 04:00 UT. (a) The spatially resolved DEM distribution of the CH and surrounding regions in 10 temperature bins. The red, blue and yellow contours indicate the bottom, trailing and leading boundary regions of the CH. The dashed-line squares indicate the sample of quiet Sun regions in south (red), east (blue) and west (yellow) direction from the CH. (b) Average DEM … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Correlation dimension map overlaid on the boundary of the CH across a 1-hour period, from 2018 November 01 04:00 to 05:00 UT. A 30 s animation of this figure is available as electronic supplementary material, covering an hour of solar time. 4.3. Irregularities of Coronal Hole Boundary The irregularities of the CH boundary can be quantified using the Correlation Dimension Mapping (CDM) method developed by M… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time-distance stack plots of the various properties along the CH boundary, starting from the southwest corner of the CH. From top to bottom, the left column shows the correlation dimension D, EM-weighted temperature T¯ and the signed magnetic flux B¯, while the right column shows the EM, the electron density Ne, and the unsigned magnetic flux B¯us. Each section is separated by the dash-dotted lines. The le… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The average correlation dimension, plasma parameters and magnetic field proper￾ties inside each coronal hole boundary section from 04:00 UT to 05:00 UT. Similar to view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simplified diagrams illustrating the overall structure of the leading (western: W) and trailing (eastern: E) boundary of the observed CH from a side view (panel a) and top view (panel b). The blue field lines are the CH field lines: dashed lines are open field lines, and the solid lines are closed field lines making up the helmet streamer legs. The leading boundary consists of large well-organised coronal … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between CH boundaries and their associated spatial irregularities that are obtained using different intensity thresholds. The value of 35 DN s−1 (middle panel) is the value used in the analysis. The white dashed lines indicate the CH boundary regions view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: AIA observations of CH in six EUV passbands. The left panel shows the low-latitude CH with its boundary overplotted in white. The coloured contours indicate different sections of the CH boundary region, similar to view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coronal hole boundaries are the interfaces between closed and open magnetic field regions in the solar atmosphere. Many fundamental processes take place at these regions, including magnetic reconnection that is responsible for solar wind release and restructuring of the solar magnetic field. In this paper, we present a case study in which we investigate the physical properties of the boundary of a large low-latitude coronal hole. Differential Emission Measure analysis is used to derive the plasma properties of these regions. We also apply correlation dimension mapping analysis to measure the irregularities of the coronal hole boundary. We find that the leading boundary of this coronal hole has a slightly higher average plasma temperature, is associated with a stronger and more unipolar magnetic field, and has a smoother boundary line than the trailing counterpart. These differences are hypothesised to be direct consequences of the local magnetic field configurations of the coronal hole boundary: the leading boundary corresponds to large, well-organised coronal loops, and the trailing boundary corresponds to more dispersed, randomly orientated small magnetic bipoles. Hence, we suggest that the surrounding magnetic field structure and the nature of magnetic reconnection influence the properties of coronal hole boundaries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a case study of one low-latitude coronal hole, employing Differential Emission Measure (DEM) analysis to derive plasma properties (temperature, density) at the boundaries and correlation-dimension mapping to quantify spatial irregularities. The authors report that the leading boundary exhibits slightly higher average temperature, stronger and more unipolar magnetic field, and smoother boundary morphology than the trailing boundary. They hypothesize that these contrasts arise directly from differing local magnetic topologies: large, organized coronal loops on the leading side versus dispersed, randomly oriented small bipoles on the trailing side, with implications for magnetic reconnection and solar wind release.

Significance. If the hypothesized causal link between magnetic configuration and boundary properties can be substantiated, the work would contribute to understanding how topology modulates coronal hole boundary dynamics and open-field plasma release. The application of established DEM inversion and fractal-dimension techniques to boundary characterization is a methodological strength, providing a reproducible observational framework. However, the single-epoch, single-event design inherently limits generalizability and leaves the interpretive claim vulnerable to untested alternatives.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion] Discussion section: The central hypothesis that observed differences in temperature, field polarity/strength, and boundary smoothness are 'direct consequences' of the proposed magnetic configurations (large loops vs. small bipoles) is presented without quantitative forward modeling, MHD simulation comparisons, or explicit tests that rule out line-of-sight projection through 3-D loop geometry or the hole's specific evolutionary stage.
  2. [Results] Results section: Reported differences in average plasma temperature and magnetic field properties are given without error bars, standard deviations, or statistical significance measures (e.g., t-test or Kolmogorov-Smirnov p-values between leading and trailing segments), undermining assessment of whether the leading-trailing asymmetry exceeds measurement uncertainty or boundary-definition sensitivity.
  3. [Methods] Methods section: The correlation-dimension analysis for boundary irregularity lacks a sensitivity study on the choice of intensity threshold for boundary tracing or the range of spatial scales over which the dimension is computed; these parameters can alter the reported smoothness contrast independently of the underlying magnetic topology.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'slightly higher average plasma temperature' is used without a numerical delta or context relative to typical coronal-hole boundary gradients, reducing clarity for readers.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: Several figures showing DEM maps and boundary overlays would benefit from explicit scale bars, color-bar units, and annotation of leading vs. trailing sides to aid immediate interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments by revising the relevant sections to incorporate statistical measures, sensitivity analyses, and more cautious interpretation of the results while acknowledging study limitations. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section: The central hypothesis that observed differences in temperature, field polarity/strength, and boundary smoothness are 'direct consequences' of the proposed magnetic configurations (large loops vs. small bipoles) is presented without quantitative forward modeling, MHD simulation comparisons, or explicit tests that rule out line-of-sight projection through 3-D loop geometry or the hole's specific evolutionary stage.

    Authors: We agree that the hypothesis relies on observational correlations rather than direct quantitative tests. As this is an observational case study, new MHD simulations or forward modeling lie outside the present scope. In the revised manuscript we will rephrase the discussion to state that the differences are 'consistent with' the differing magnetic topologies rather than 'direct consequences', and we will explicitly note line-of-sight projection effects and the coronal hole's evolutionary stage as untested alternative explanations, together with references to existing MHD studies of coronal-hole boundaries. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: Reported differences in average plasma temperature and magnetic field properties are given without error bars, standard deviations, or statistical significance measures (e.g., t-test or Kolmogorov-Smirnov p-values between leading and trailing segments), undermining assessment of whether the leading-trailing asymmetry exceeds measurement uncertainty or boundary-definition sensitivity.

    Authors: This criticism is valid. We will add error bars to the reported average temperatures and magnetic-field quantities, derived from the formal uncertainties of the DEM inversions and magnetogram data. We will also include statistical tests (t-tests and, where appropriate, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests) comparing the leading and trailing boundary segments to quantify whether the observed differences are significant relative to measurement and boundary-definition uncertainties. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The correlation-dimension analysis for boundary irregularity lacks a sensitivity study on the choice of intensity threshold for boundary tracing or the range of spatial scales over which the dimension is computed; these parameters can alter the reported smoothness contrast independently of the underlying magnetic topology.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion. The revised methods section (or a new supplementary note) will present a sensitivity analysis in which the correlation dimension is recomputed for intensity thresholds varied by ±10 % around the adopted value and for several spatial-scale ranges. This will demonstrate that the reported leading-trailing smoothness contrast remains robust within the explored parameter space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pure observational case study with hypothesis only

full rationale

The paper performs DEM-derived plasma diagnostics and correlation-dimension boundary mapping on a single low-latitude coronal hole. Observed contrasts (temperature, field polarity, boundary smoothness) are reported directly from the data and then stated as a hypothesis linking them to leading/trailing magnetic topologies. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are defined in terms of the target quantities; no self-citation chain supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz; the central claim remains an interpretation of independent measurements rather than a reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters fitted; relies on standard solar physics assumptions for DEM inversion and correlation dimension as irregularity measure. No new entities postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Differential emission measure inversion reliably recovers average plasma temperature from EUV observations
    Implicit when using DEM to derive plasma properties
  • domain assumption Correlation dimension measures spatial irregularity of coronal hole boundary meaningfully
    Used without additional justification in abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 8414 in / 1072 out tokens · 61527 ms · 2026-05-08T05:23:50.150700+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., et al

    , volume = 201, number =. doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0264-1 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0264-1

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Coronal Cells in Coronal Holes: Systematic Analysis and Implications for Coronal Evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf7a9 , archivePrefix =. 2508.03607 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf7a9

  3. [3]

    , volume = 731, number = 2, pages = 112, doi =

  4. [4]

    N., Henney, C

    Twelfth International Solar Wind Conference , publisher =. doi:10.1063/1.3395870 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3395870

  5. [5]

    , volume = 931, number = 2, pages = 96, doi =

  6. [6]

    1999, XSPEC: An X-ray spectral fitting package,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:9910.005 http://ascl.net/9910.005 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    , volume = 558, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

  7. [7]

    , volume = 971, number = 1, pages = 45, doi =

  8. [8]

    , volume = 246, number = 2, pages = 23, doi =

  9. [9]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , volume = 328, number = 8, pages = 773, doi =

  10. [10]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , volume = 5, number = 55, pages = 2801, doi =

  11. [11]

    ApJ , author =

    Coronal Electron Temperature Inferred from the Strahl Electrons in the Inner Heliosphere: Parker Solar Probe and Helios Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b7a , archivePrefix =. 2003.04016 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b7a 2003

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    , volume = 275, number =. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9804-8 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9804-8

  13. [13]

    , year = 2000, journal =

    Bradski, G. , year = 2000, journal =

    2000

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Hinode/Extreme-Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrometer Observations of the Temperature Structure of the Quiet Corona. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1522 , archivePrefix =. 0905.3603 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/2/1522

  15. [15]

    , volume = 761, number = 1, pages = 62, doi =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of Spatial Complexity in Flare Ribbon Substructure and Its Relationship to Magnetic Reconnection Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4a19 , archivePrefix =. 2602.20470 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4a19

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1007/s11207-016-0957-3 , keywords =

    , volume = 291, number = 7, pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-016-0957-3 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-016-0957-3

  18. [18]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8409685 , version =

    Scientific colour maps. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8409685 , version =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8409685

  19. [19]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics , volume = 6, number = 1, pages = 3, doi =

  20. [20]

    P., Landi, E., Mason, H

    , volume = 125, pages =. doi:10.1051/aas:1997368 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1997368

  21. [21]

    , volume = 241, number = 2, pages = 22, doi =

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1029/2002JA009284 , keywords =

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , volume = 108, number =. doi:10.1029/2002JA009284 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1029/2002ja009284

  23. [23]

    J., Velli, M

    The Solar Probe Plus Mission: Humanity's First Visit to Our Star. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0211-6

  24. [24]

    Astronomy and Computing , volume = 12, pages =

    ASDF: A new data format for astronomy , author =. Astronomy and Computing , volume = 12, pages =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2015.06.004 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2015.06.004 2015

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    , volume = 539, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117576 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117576

  26. [26]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219727 , keywords =

    , volume = 553, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219727 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219727

  27. [27]

    R., Millman, K

    , volume = 585, number = 7825, pages =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

  28. [28]

    , volume = 861, number = 2, pages = 151, doi =

  29. [29]

    , volume = 294, number = 10, pages = 144, doi =

  30. [30]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037613 , keywords =

    , volume = 638, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037613 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037613

  31. [31]

    , volume = 296, number = 1, pages = 18, doi =

  32. [32]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    , volume = 679, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347180 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347180

  33. [33]

    Astrophysical Journal , author =

    On the Origin of the Sudden Heliospheric Open Magnetic Flux Enhancement During the 2014 Pole Reversal. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2b69 , archivePrefix =. 2402.12805 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2b69 2014

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic Topology and Loop Statistics in Observed Coronal Holes Using Potential Field Modeling. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae39c4 , archivePrefix =. 2601.11080 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae39c4

  35. [35]

    Solar Physics , author =

    , volume = 290, number = 4, pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0666-3 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0666-3

  36. [36]

    , volume = 835, number = 2, pages = 268, doi =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The Basic Iterative Deconvolution: A Fast Instrumental Point-Spread Function Deconvolution Method That Corrects for Light That Is Scattered Out of the Field of View of a Detector. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02321-y , archivePrefix =. 2312.11784 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02321-y

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Revised Point-spread Functions for the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adbaed , archivePrefix =. 2410.08967 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adbaed

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Formation of a Coronal Hole by a Quiet-Sun Filament Eruption. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae11b0 , archivePrefix =. 2509.04663 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae11b0

  40. [40]

    Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment

    Computing in Science and Engineering , volume = 9, number = 3, pages =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  41. [41]

    doi:10.1086/340937 , keywords =

    , volume = 574, number = 1, pages =. doi:10.1086/340937 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1086/340937

  42. [42]

    doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9517-4 , keywords =

    , volume = 262, number = 1, pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9517-4 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9517-4

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1672 , keywords =

    , volume = 714, number = 2, pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1672 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1672

  44. [44]

    , volume = 925, number = 1, pages = 62, doi =

  45. [45]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad777 , keywords =

    , volume = 863, number = 2, pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad777 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad777 2041

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Elemental Abundances at Coronal Hole Boundaries as a Means to Investigate Interchange Reconnection and the Solar Wind. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb7d4 , archivePrefix =. 2502.19639 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb7d4

  47. [47]

    R., Title, A

    , volume = 275, number =. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8

  48. [48]

    , volume = 948, number = 1, pages = 24, doi =

  49. [49]

    , volume = 848, number = 1, pages = 70, doi =

  50. [50]

    , volume = 918, number = 1, pages = 21, doi =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    The Effects of Differential Rotation on the Magnetic Structure of the Solar Corona: Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/429268 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/429268

  52. [52]

    , volume = 882, number = 2, pages = 90, doi =

  53. [53]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    , volume = 498, number = 4, pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2660 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2660

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912066 , keywords =

    , volume = 503, number = 3, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912066 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912066

  55. [55]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9124 , keywords =

    , volume = 937, number = 1, pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9124 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9124 2041

  56. [56]

    I., Lionello, R., Downs, C., et al

    Time-dependent Dynamics of the Corona. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad00bd , archivePrefix =. 2306.11956 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad00bd 2041

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Thermal structuring of the quiet solar corona. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452955 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452955

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Investigating Solar Wind Outflows from Open Closed Magnetic Field Structures Using Coordinated Solar Orbiter and Hinode Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02438-8 , archivePrefix =. 2502.08290 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02438-8

  59. [59]

    Proceedings of Workshop on Machine Learning Systems (LearningSys) in The Thirty-first Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , url =

    CuPy: A NumPy-Compatible Library for NVIDIA GPU Calculations , author =. Proceedings of Workshop on Machine Learning Systems (LearningSys) in The Thirty-first Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , url =

  60. [60]

    and Varoquaux, G

    Pedregosa, F. and Varoquaux, G. and Gramfort, A. and Michel, V. and Thirion, B. and Grisel, O. and Blondel, M. and Prettenhofer, P. and Weiss, R. and Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J. and Passos, A. and Cournapeau, D. and Brucher, M. and Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. , year = 2011, journal =. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in

    2011

  61. [61]

    D., Thompson , B

    , volume = 275, number =. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9841-3

  62. [62]

    , volume = 775, number = 2, pages = 100, doi =

  63. [63]

    , volume = 913, number = 1, pages = 28, doi =

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    A Community Data Set for Comparing Automated Coronal Hole Detection Schemes. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad1408 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad1408

  65. [65]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics , keywords =

    The Sun's supergranulation. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s41116-018-0013-5 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-018-0013-5

  66. [66]

    doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0101-y , keywords =

    , volume = 281, number = 2, pages =. doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0101-y , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0101-y

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Influence of coronal hole morphology on the solar wind speed at Earth. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142793 , archivePrefix =. 2204.00368 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142793

  68. [68]

    , volume = 295, number = 1, pages = 6, doi =

  69. [69]

    H., Schou, J., Bush, R

    , volume = 275, number =. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2

  70. [70]

    , volume = 749, number = 1, pages = 40, doi =

  71. [71]

    , volume = 772, number = 2, pages = 88, doi =

  72. [72]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , volume = 5, number = 54, pages = 2732, doi =

  73. [73]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039789 , keywords =

    , volume = 650, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039789 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039789

  74. [74]

    , year = 1998, month = jul, volume =

    The Advanced Composition Explorer. , year = 1998, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1023/A:1005082526237 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005082526237 1998

  75. [75]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913624 , keywords =

    , volume = 516, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913624 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913624

  76. [76]

    , volume = 890, number = 1, pages = 68, doi =

  77. [77]

    doi:10.1007/BF00153291 , keywords =

    , volume = 42, number = 1, pages =. doi:10.1007/BF00153291 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00153291

  78. [78]

    , year = 2026, month = feb, volume =

    Day-to-Day Boundary Fluctuations in Coronal Holes: Causes and Consequences. , year = 2026, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1007/s11207-026-02610-8 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-026-02610-8 2026

  79. [79]

    Van der Walt, J

    van der Walt,. scikit-image: image processing in. PeerJ , volume = 2, pages =. doi:10.7717/peerj.453 , issn =

    work page doi:10.7717/peerj.453

  80. [80]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , keywords =

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , volume = 125, number = 7, pages =. doi:10.1029/2018JA026005 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1029/2018ja026005

Showing first 80 references.