pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06461 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Quantum spin dynamics of heavy quarks and polarization observables in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Sunil Jaiswal , Sourav Dey , Amaresh Jaiswal
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords heavy quark spin dynamicsspin density matrixheavy ion collisionsspin alignmentD star mesonLambda_c baryonALICE measurementsdepolarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A density-matrix framework evolves heavy-quark polarization from initial magnetic alignment to final hadron observables.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs a quantum spin-density-matrix description of heavy quark spin dynamics inside the quark-gluon plasma. It begins with an initial polarization along the magnetic field direction and derives the time-evolution equation together with its analytic solution. The final polarization is translated into measurable quantities for vector mesons and baryons by a fragmentation prescription that combines the heavy quark spin with a light antiquark spin. Comparison to ALICE data on prompt D*+ spin alignment fixes the strength of an effective depolarization term that controls the spin relaxation time. The fitted value then supplies numerical estimates for the polarization of Lambda_c+ and anti-Lambda_c- baryons and for an elliptic polarization harmonic generated by the almond-shaped fireball geometry.

Core claim

The central claim is that heavy-quark spin polarization obeys a density-matrix evolution equation whose analytic solution, when combined with a fragmentation-based hadronization prescription, reproduces the observed D* spin alignment and thereby determines an effective depolarization strength that sets the spin-relaxation timescale and yields benchmark predictions for Lambda_c polarization.

What carries the argument

The quantum spin-density-matrix evolution equation for the heavy-quark polarization vector, solved analytically and mapped to observables by coupling the heavy-quark spin to a light antiquark during fragmentation.

Load-bearing premise

The fragmentation process couples the heavy quark spin to the light antiquark spin in a way that directly determines the observed vector-meson rho_00 and baryon polarization.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of Lambda_c polarization that lies outside the range allowed by the depolarization strength fitted to ALICE D* data would falsify the spin-transfer assumption in the hadronization prescription.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06461 by Amaresh Jaiswal, Sourav Dey, Sunil Jaiswal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Posterior fit of Eq. (29) to the ALICE measurement of 𝐷∗+ spin alignment [37]. The model prediction is averaged over the experimental 𝑝𝑇 and rapidity bins. The solid curve shows the posterior median and the shaded band shows the 68% credible interval. The dashed horizontal line indicates the unpolarized value 𝜌00 = 1∕3. 𝐷∗+ yield. Since the present analysis does not include a simultaneous description of th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Reference estimate for Λ+ 𝑐 and Λ̄ − 𝑐 polarization obtained by using the depolarization parameter 𝜅 fitted to the ALICE 𝐷∗+ spin-alignment data. The curves use Eqs. (31) and (32) with 𝐶Λ𝑐 = 1. The solid curves denote the posterior medians and the shaded bands denote the 68% credible intervals obtained by propagating the posterior for 𝜅. The same fitted spin-relaxation dynamics can be used to estimate open… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Second polarization harmonic 𝑝2 for the 𝐷∗+ spin￾alignment observable and for Λ+ 𝑐 polarization, obtained using the depolarization strength fitted to the ALICE 𝐷∗+ spin￾alignment data. The results are averaged over 0.3 < |𝑦| < 0.8. The solid curves denote the posterior medians and the shaded bands denote the 68% credible intervals. The corresponding harmonic coefficient is 𝑝 𝐷∗+ 𝑛 (𝑝𝑇 , 𝑦) = 6 3 − 𝑋(𝑝𝑇 , 𝑦… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a quantum spin-density-matrix framework for heavy-quark spin dynamics in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Starting from an initial polarization induced along the magnetic-field direction, we derive the evolution equation for spin polarization within this framework and obtain analytic solutions. The evolved polarization is connected to open heavy-flavor observables via a fragmentation-based hadronization prescription. For vector mesons, the spin-alignment parameter $\rho_{00}$ is constructed by coupling the heavy-quark spin to that of the light antiquark produced during fragmentation. We confront our results with recent ALICE measurements of prompt $D^{*+}$ spin alignment in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02~{\rm TeV}$ and extract an effective depolarization strength that determines the spin-relaxation time scale. Using this fitted parameter, we provide benchmark estimates for $\Lambda_c^+$ and $\bar{\Lambda}_c^-$ polarization, up to an overall spin-transfer normalization. We further estimate the recently proposed elliptic polarization harmonic arising from path-length-dependent depolarization in an anisotropic fireball.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a quantum spin-density-matrix framework for heavy-quark spin dynamics in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Starting from initial polarization along the magnetic-field direction, it derives the evolution equation and obtains analytic solutions for the time-dependent spin polarization. These are connected to observables via a fragmentation-based hadronization prescription in which the heavy-quark spin density matrix is coupled to an assumed light-antiquark spin state to construct the vector-meson alignment parameter rho_00 and analogous expressions for Lambda_c baryon polarization. The model is confronted with ALICE prompt D*+ rho_00 data in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV to extract an effective depolarization strength; this single fitted parameter is then used to provide benchmark estimates for Lambda_c^+ and anti-Lambda_c^- polarization (up to an overall normalization) and for the elliptic polarization harmonic arising from path-length-dependent depolarization in an anisotropic fireball.

Significance. If the fragmentation prescription holds, the work supplies a transparent analytic framework for extracting a spin-relaxation time scale from data and generating predictions for other heavy-flavor polarization observables. The derivation of closed-form analytic solutions for the density-matrix evolution is a genuine strength, as it makes the dependence on the depolarization parameter explicit and falsifiable. Timely comparison with recent ALICE measurements adds phenomenological relevance. However, the quantitative reach is constrained by the single-parameter fit and the untested hadronization assumption, limiting the result to a useful parametrization rather than a fully independent prediction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hadronization and observables section] Hadronization and observables section: The fragmentation-based prescription that couples the heavy-quark spin density matrix to the light antiquark spin state to obtain rho_00 (and the analogous construction for Lambda_c polarization) is the load-bearing step for all quantitative results. No sensitivity tests, alternative coupling rules, or comparison to lattice or other hadronization models are provided to justify this specific spin-coupling assumption. If light-quark spin correlations or additional depolarization during fragmentation are present, the extracted depolarization strength ceases to represent purely medium-induced relaxation, and the subsequent Lambda_c estimates become uncontrolled extrapolations.
  2. [Results and data comparison section] Results and data comparison section: The central quantitative claims rest on fitting one effective depolarization parameter to the ALICE D*+ rho_00 data and directly inserting the same value into the expressions for Lambda_c polarization and the elliptic harmonic. No independent cross-check against other data sets, no error propagation from the fit, and no alternative fits are shown; by construction the Lambda_c and elliptic-harmonic results are therefore scaled versions of the fitted quantity rather than independent predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that Lambda_c estimates are given 'up to an overall spin-transfer normalization'; this important caveat should be quantified with an estimated uncertainty range and discussed more explicitly in the main text when presenting the benchmark values.
  2. [Framework section] Notation for the depolarization strength and the spin-relaxation time scale should be introduced with a clear equation reference when first defined, to avoid ambiguity when the same parameter is reused across different observables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the recognition of the analytic solutions and the timely comparison with ALICE data. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hadronization and observables section] The fragmentation-based prescription that couples the heavy-quark spin density matrix to the light antiquark spin state to obtain rho_00 (and the analogous construction for Lambda_c polarization) is the load-bearing step for all quantitative results. No sensitivity tests, alternative coupling rules, or comparison to lattice or other hadronization models are provided to justify this specific spin-coupling assumption. If light-quark spin correlations or additional depolarization during fragmentation are present, the extracted depolarization strength ceases to represent purely medium-induced relaxation, and the subsequent Lambda_c estimates become uncontrolled extrapolations.

    Authors: We agree that the fragmentation prescription is a central assumption underlying the connection to observables and that the current manuscript provides no sensitivity tests or comparisons to alternative models. The prescription follows the standard fragmentation picture in which the heavy quark combines with a light antiquark whose spin state is taken to be uncorrelated on average. We acknowledge that light-quark spin correlations or additional depolarization during hadronization would render the extracted parameter effective rather than purely medium-induced. In the revised version we will expand the relevant section to state the assumption explicitly, discuss its uncertainties, and clarify that the depolarization strength should be interpreted as effective. We will also add a forward-looking remark on the desirability of future comparisons with more advanced hadronization models. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results and data comparison section] The central quantitative claims rest on fitting one effective depolarization parameter to the ALICE D*+ rho_00 data and directly inserting the same value into the expressions for Lambda_c polarization and the elliptic harmonic. No independent cross-check against other data sets, no error propagation from the fit, and no alternative fits are shown; by construction the Lambda_c and elliptic-harmonic results are therefore scaled versions of the fitted quantity rather than independent predictions.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the Lambda_c and elliptic-harmonic estimates are obtained by direct substitution of the single parameter fitted to the D*+ data. This construction is intentional: the manuscript presents a unified analytic framework in which the parameter extracted from the only currently available vector-meson polarization data is used to generate benchmark estimates for other observables. We do not present these estimates as independent predictions. In the revision we will add explicit error propagation from the fit, include a dedicated paragraph on the limitations arising from the single-parameter fit and the absence of independent cross-checks, and emphasize that the results remain conditional on the hadronization prescription. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Depolarization strength fitted to D*+ rho_00 data then inserted directly into Lambda_c polarization estimates

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and results section (confrontation with ALICE data)]
    "We confront our results with recent ALICE measurements of prompt D*+ spin alignment in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV and extract an effective depolarization strength that determines the spin-relaxation time scale. Using this fitted parameter, we provide benchmark estimates for Lambda_c+ and anti-Lambda_c- polarization, up to an overall spin-transfer normalization."

    The depolarization strength is obtained by fitting the model's rho_00 prediction to the measured D*+ alignment; the same numerical value is then inserted into the Lambda_c polarization formula. The Lambda_c 'estimates' are therefore proportional to the fitted parameter by construction and do not constitute an independent test of the spin-evolution dynamics.

full rationale

The paper derives an evolution equation for the heavy-quark spin density matrix, obtains analytic solutions, and connects them to observables via a fragmentation prescription that couples heavy-quark spin to light antiquark spin. The central load-bearing step is the extraction of a single effective depolarization parameter from ALICE D*+ data; this fitted value is then substituted into the expressions for Lambda_c polarization (and the elliptic harmonic). By the paper's own construction the resulting 'benchmark estimates' are scaled versions of the fitted quantity rather than independent predictions. The fragmentation coupling rule itself is an ansatz, but the circularity flag is triggered specifically by the fit-then-predict structure, not by the ansatz alone. No self-citation chain or self-definitional loop is required for the reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative outputs rest on one fitted effective depolarization strength and on the assumption that fragmentation hadronization preserves a simple spin-coupling relation between heavy quark and light antiquark.

free parameters (1)
  • effective depolarization strength
    Fitted to ALICE prompt D*+ spin-alignment data to set the spin-relaxation timescale; then reused for Lambda_c and elliptic-harmonic estimates.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Fragmentation-based hadronization prescription that couples heavy-quark spin to light-antiquark spin
    Invoked to construct rho_00 for vector mesons and polarization for Lambda_c from the evolved heavy-quark spin density matrix.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5489 in / 1569 out tokens · 31509 ms · 2026-05-08T08:24:10.071455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spin dynamics and polarization in relativistic systems: recent developments

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    The review summarizes developments in spin hydrodynamics, polarization from spin-vorticity coupling, pseudo-gauge freedom, and heavy-flavor spin dynamics in relativistic systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    E.V.Shuryak,TheoryofHadronicPlasma,Sov.Phys.JETP47(1978) 212–219

    1978

  2. [2]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.Ann

    U. Heinz, R. Snellings, Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 123–151. arXiv:1301.2826,doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170540

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102212-170540 2013

  3. [3]

    Everettet al.[JETSCAPE], Phys

    D. Everett, et al., Multisystem Bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of QCD matter, Phys. Rev. C 103 (5) (2021) 054904. arXiv:2011.01430,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054904

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.054904 2021

  4. [4]

    B.Svetitsky,Diffusionofcharmedquarksinthequark-gluonplasma, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 2484–2491.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2484

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.2484 1988

  5. [5]

    G. D. Moore, D. Teaney, How much do heavy quarks thermalize in a heavy ion collision?, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 064904.arXiv: hep-ph/0412346,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064904

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevc.71.064904 2005

  6. [6]

    Heavy-quark probes of the quark-gluon plasma and interpretation of recent data taken at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider,

    H. van Hees, V. Greco, R. Rapp, Heavy-quark probes of the quark- gluon plasma and interpretation of recent data taken at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 034913. arXiv:nucl-th/0508055,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034913

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.73.034913 2006

  7. [7]

    arXiv:hep-th/0605182,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.126005

    S.S.Gubser,DragforceinAdS/CFT,Phys.Rev.D74(2006)126005. arXiv:hep-th/0605182,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.126005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.126005 2006

  8. [8]

    van Hees, M

    H. van Hees, M. Mannarelli, V. Greco, R. Rapp, Nonperturbative heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 192301.arXiv:0709.2884,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 192301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100 2008

  9. [9]

    Akamatsu, T

    Y. Akamatsu, T. Hatsuda, T. Hirano, Heavy Quark Diffusion with RelativisticLangevinDynamicsintheQuark-GluonFluid,Phys.Rev. C 79 (2009) 054907.arXiv:0809.1499,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79. 054907

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79 2009

  10. [10]

    S. K. Das, J.-e. Alam, P. Mohanty, Dragging Heavy Quarks in Quark Gluon Plasma at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 014908.arXiv:1003.5508,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.014908

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.014908 2010

  11. [11]

    D.Banerjee,S.Datta,R.Gavai,P.Majumdar,HeavyQuarkMomen- tum Diffusion Coefficient from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 014510.arXiv:1109.5738,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014510

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.014510 2012

  12. [12]

    70 (2014) 00061.arXiv:1210.0292, doi:10.1051/epjconf/20147000061

    H.T.Ding,A.Francis,O.Kaczmarek,F.Karsch,H.Satz,W.Söldner, Charmonium dissociation and heavy quark transport in hot quenched lattice QCD, EPJ Web Conf. 70 (2014) 00061.arXiv:1210.0292, doi:10.1051/epjconf/20147000061

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/20147000061 2014

  13. [13]

    S. K. Das, F. Scardina, S. Plumari, V. Greco, Toward a solution to the raa and v2 puzzle for heavy quarks, Physics Letters B 747 (2015) 260–264

    2015

  14. [14]

    Adamczyk, et al., Measurement of𝐷 0 Azimuthal Anisotropy at Midrapidity in Au+Au Collisions at √𝑠𝑁𝑁=200 GeV, Phys

    L. Adamczyk, et al., Measurement of𝐷 0 Azimuthal Anisotropy at Midrapidity in Au+Au Collisions at √𝑠𝑁𝑁=200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (21) (2017) 212301.arXiv:1701.06060,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.118.212301

    work page arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    X.Dong,V.Greco,Heavyquarkproductionandpropertiesofquark– gluon plasma, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 104 (2019) 97–141

    2019

  16. [16]

    Acharya, et al., Prompt D0, D+, and D∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at √𝑠NN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 01 (2022) 174.arXiv:2110

    S. Acharya, et al., Prompt D0, D+, and D∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at √𝑠NN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 01 (2022) 174.arXiv:2110. 09420,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)174

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)174 2022

  17. [17]

    Braaten, M

    E. Braaten, M. H. Thoma, Energy loss of a heavy quark in the quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 44 (9) (1991) R2625.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.44.R2625

    1991

  18. [18]

    Golam Mustafa, D

    M. Golam Mustafa, D. Pal, D. Kumar Srivastava, Propagation of charm quarks in equilibrating quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 889–898, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 57, 3499–3499 (1998)]. arXiv:nucl-th/9706001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.57.3499

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.57.3499 1998

  19. [19]

    Romatschke, M

    P. Romatschke, M. Strickland, Collisional energy loss of a heavy quark in an anisotropic quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 125008.arXiv:hep-ph/0408275,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.125008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.125008 2005

  20. [20]

    van Hees, R

    H. van Hees, R. Rapp, Thermalization of heavy quarks in the quark- gluonplasma,Phys.Rev.C71(2005)034907.arXiv:nucl-th/0412015, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.034907

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.71.034907 2005

  21. [21]

    P. P. Bhaduri, N. Borghini, A. Jaiswal, M. Strickland, Anisotropic escape mechanism and elliptic flow of bottomonia, Phys. Rev. C 100(5)(2019)051901.arXiv:1809.06235,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100. 051901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100 2019

  22. [22]

    P. P. Bhaduri, M. Alqahtani, N. Borghini, A. Jaiswal, M. Strickland, Fireball tomography from bottomonia elliptic flow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (7) (2021) 585.arXiv: 2007.03939,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09383-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09383-3 2021

  23. [23]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, M. K. Köhler, A. Mazeliauskas, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, V. Vislavicius, The multiple-charm hierarchy in the statistical hadronization model, JHEP 07 (2021) 035.arXiv: 2104.12754,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)035

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)035 2021

  24. [24]

    Kumar, N

    D. Kumar, N. Sarkar, P. P. Bhaduri, A. Jaiswal, Examination of thermalization of quarkonia at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 107 (6) (2023) 064906.arXiv:2303. 02900,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.064906

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.064906 2023

  25. [25]

    and others

    A. Andronic, et al., Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter, Eur. Phys. J. A 60 (4) (2024) 88.arXiv:2402.04366, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01306-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01306-6 2024

  26. [26]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A803 (2008) 227–253.arXiv: 0711.0950,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298 2008

  27. [27]

    V.Skokov,A.Y.Illarionov,V.Toneev,Estimateofthemagneticfield strengthinheavy-ioncollisions,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A24(2009)5925– 5932.arXiv:0907.1396,doi:10.1142/S0217751X09047570

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x09047570 2009

  28. [28]

    Voronyuk, V

    V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, S. A. Voloshin, (Electro-)Magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 054911. arXiv:1103.4239,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054911

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.054911 2011

  29. [29]

    Bloczynski, X.-G

    J. Bloczynski, X.-G. Huang, X. Zhang, J. Liao, Azimuthally fluc- tuating magnetic field and its impacts on observables in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1529–1535.arXiv:1209.6594, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.12.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.12.030 2013

  30. [30]

    Tuchin, Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativisticheavy-ioncollisions,Adv.HighEnergyPhys.2013(2013) 490495.arXiv:1301.0099,doi:10.1155/2013/490495

    K. Tuchin, Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativisticheavy-ioncollisions,Adv.HighEnergyPhys.2013(2013) 490495.arXiv:1301.0099,doi:10.1155/2013/490495

    work page doi:10.1155/2013/490495 2013

  31. [31]

    L.McLerran,V.Skokov,CommentsAbouttheElectromagneticField in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 929 (2014) 184–190.arXiv: 1305.0774,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.05.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.05.008 2014

  32. [32]

    Huang, Y

    A. Huang, Y. Jiang, S. Shi, J. Liao, P. Zhuang, Out-of-equilibrium chiral magnetic effect from chiral kinetic theory, Phys. Lett. B 777 (2018) 177–183.arXiv:1703.08856,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12. 025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12 2018

  33. [33]

    Dynamical magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions,

    A. Huang, D. She, S. Shi, M. Huang, J. Liao, Dynamical magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 107 (3) (2023) 034901. arXiv:2212.08579,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.034901 2023

  34. [34]

    Jiang, S

    Z.-F. Jiang, S. Cao, W.-J. Xing, X.-Y. Wu, C. B. Yang, B.-W. Zhang, Probing the initial longitudinal density profile and electromagnetic field inultrarelativistic heavy-ioncollisions with heavyquarks, Phys. Rev. C 105 (5) (2022) 054907.arXiv:2202.13555,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.105.054907. :Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 8 of 9 Quantum spin dynamics of h...

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    S. Dey, A. Jaiswal, Rotational Brownian motion and heavy quark polarization in QCD medium, Phys. Lett. B 873 (2026) 140202. arXiv:2502.20352,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140202

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140202 2026

  36. [36]

    Heavy quark polarization anisotropy as a novel probe of fireball geometry,

    A. Jaiswal, Heavy quark polarization anisotropy as a novel probe of fireball geometry (1 2026).arXiv:2601.22882

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Acharya, et al., First measurement of D∗+ vector meson spin alignmentinPb–Pbcollisionsat √𝑠NN = 5.02TeV,JHEP10(2025) 094.arXiv:2504.00714,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2025)094

    S. Acharya, et al., First measurement of D∗+ vector meson spin alignmentinPb–Pbcollisionsat √𝑠NN = 5.02TeV,JHEP10(2025) 094.arXiv:2504.00714,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2025)094

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2025)094 2025

  38. [38]

    J. J. Sakurai, J. Napolitano, Modern quantum mechanics., Addison- Wesley, 1994

    1994

  39. [39]

    E.Leader,SpininParticlePhysics,CambridgeMonographsonParti- cle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  40. [40]

    Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear col- lisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid

    L. Adamczyk, et al., GlobalΛhyperon polarization in nuclear colli- sions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature 548 (2017) 62–65. arXiv:1701.06657,doi:10.1038/nature23004

    work page doi:10.1038/nature23004 2017

  41. [41]

    Liang, X.-N

    Z.-T. Liang, X.-N. Wang, Spin alignment of vector mesons in non- central A+A collisions, Phys. Lett. B 629 (2005) 20–26.arXiv: nucl-th/0411101,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.060

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.060 2005

  42. [42]

    Yang, R.-H

    Y.-G. Yang, R.-H. Fang, Q. Wang, X.-N. Wang, Quark coalescence model for polarized vector mesons and baryons, Phys. Rev. C 97 (3) (2018) 034917.arXiv:1711.06008,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034917

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.034917 2018

  43. [43]

    A.V.Manohar,M.B.Wise,Heavyquarkphysics,Vol.10,Cambridge University Press, 2000.doi:10.1017/9781009402125

    work page doi:10.1017/9781009402125 2000

  44. [44]

    R. S. Bhalerao, Collectivity in large and small systems formed in ultrarelativistic collisions, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (3) (2021) 635–654. arXiv:2009.09586,doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00019-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00019-x 2021

  45. [45]

    C.Loizides,J.Kamin,D.d’Enterria,ImprovedMonteCarloGlauber predictionsatpresentandfuturenuclearcolliders,Phys.Rev.C97(5) (2018) 054910, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 99, 019901 (2019)].arXiv: 1710.07098,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054910

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.054910 2018

  46. [46]

    :Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 9 of 9

    BayesianAnalysisofNuclearDynamics(BAND)Frameworkproject, 2020,https://bandframework.github.io/. :Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 9 of 9

    2020