pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06775 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

SIRENA -- Sum-Integral REductioN Algorithm

Luis Gil , Javier L\'opez Miras , Adri\'an Moreno-S\'anchez
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 00:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords sum-integralsLaporta algorithmfinite temperatureintegration-by-partsMatsubara sumsthermal field theorymulti-loop reductionfermionic integrals
0
0 comments X

The pith

SIRENA automates reduction of multi-loop sum-integrals at finite temperature by extending the Laporta algorithm to Matsubara sums.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents SIRENA, a combined Python and C++ package that applies integration-by-parts identities to reduce complicated multi-loop sum-integrals appearing in finite-temperature quantum field theory. It adapts the standard Laporta method, originally developed for zero-temperature Feynman integrals, by consistently treating the discrete sums over imaginary-time frequencies. The authors demonstrate that this adaptation reproduces established results in the literature through three-loop order. They also supply previously unavailable reductions for certain three-loop fermionic sum-integrals and derive a closed analytic factorization formula that holds for any two-loop fermionic sum-integral.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Laporta algorithm extends directly to finite-temperature sum-integrals once the integration-by-parts relations are formulated to respect the Matsubara sum structure, thereby allowing systematic reduction to a smaller set of master sum-integrals; this is shown by explicit reproduction of known three-loop results, new reductions for selected fermionic cases, and an exact factorization formula for arbitrary two-loop fermionic sum-integrals that generalizes an earlier bosonic result.

What carries the argument

SIRENA, the Python/C++ implementation of the Laporta algorithm that incorporates the discrete Matsubara frequency sums into the generation and solution of integration-by-parts identities for sum-integrals.

If this is right

  • All previously published reductions up to three loops can be recovered automatically without manual intervention.
  • Selected three-loop fermionic sum-integrals now possess explicit reduction formulas for the first time.
  • Any two-loop fermionic sum-integral factors analytically into simpler pieces according to the derived formula.
  • Higher-order calculations in thermal field theory become feasible by feeding the reduced masters into numerical or analytic evaluation codes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adaptation of integration-by-parts methods could be tested on sum-integrals with external momenta or in theories with different statistics.
  • The factorization formula for two-loop fermionic cases suggests that similar closed forms might exist at higher loops once the appropriate symmetry properties are identified.
  • Automated tools like SIRENA could reduce the computational bottleneck in evaluating thermal corrections to observables in the Standard Model or beyond.

Load-bearing premise

The Laporta algorithm remains complete and consistent when applied to finite-temperature sum-integrals, without requiring extra identities or encountering inconsistencies from the replacement of continuous momentum integrals by discrete Matsubara sums.

What would settle it

If SIRENA produces reduction relations for a known three-loop sum-integral that differ from the published result in the literature, the extension of the method would be shown to be inconsistent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06775 by Adri\'an Moreno-S\'anchez, Javier L\'opez Miras, Luis Gil.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Performance of the different systems (A, B, C) in the three benchmarks. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present SIRENA, a Python and C++ implementation of the Laporta algorithm for the automatic reduction of multi-loop sum-integrals via integration-by-parts identities. The method builds on established techniques for zero-temperature Feynman integrals and extends them to finite-temperature quantum field theory by consistently accounting for the Matsubara sum structure. We validate the framework by reproducing several known results from the literature up to 3-loop order, and we further provide, for the first time, reductions for selected 3-loop fermionic sum-integrals. In addition to the package, we derive an analytic factorization formula for arbitrary 2-loop fermionic sum-integrals, extending on a previous result for the bosonic case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces SIRENA, a Python/C++ implementation of the Laporta algorithm for automatic reduction of multi-loop sum-integrals in finite-temperature QFT. It extends zero-temperature IBP techniques by incorporating the Matsubara sum structure, validates the package by reproducing known results up to 3-loop order, supplies new reductions for selected 3-loop fermionic sum-integrals, and derives an analytic factorization formula for arbitrary 2-loop fermionic sum-integrals that extends a prior bosonic result.

Significance. If the reductions are complete and the implementation robust, the work supplies a practical automated tool for high-order thermal calculations together with a new closed-form factorization that could simplify 2-loop fermionic evaluations. The reproduction of literature results up to 3 loops and the provision of first-time 3-loop fermionic reductions constitute concrete, falsifiable contributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (validation): the claim of reproducing known results up to 3-loop order and generating new 3-loop fermionic reductions is presented without explicit enumeration of the tested integrals, the precise comparison protocol (symbolic identity or numerical agreement within tolerance), or code-level checks for truncation or overflow. This information is required to confirm that the reported reductions are not incomplete.
  2. [Laporta extension section] Section describing the Laporta extension (likely §2): the statement that the algorithm 'consistently accounts for the Matsubara sum structure' does not specify whether the discrete frequency sums are folded into the IBP generator via automatic differentiation only or whether additional discrete identities (e.g., from Matsubara periodicity, frequency shifts, or sum rules not derivable from continuous derivatives) are inserted by hand. If the latter are omitted, the reduction basis for the new fermionic cases and the claimed 2-loop factorization formula may be incomplete.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Factorization formula] The factorization formula is stated to extend the bosonic case, but the explicit mapping between the two (e.g., which terms acquire minus signs or additional factors) is not shown; a short derivation appendix would improve clarity.
  2. [Notation] Notation for sum-integrals (e.g., the precise definition of the measure including the Matsubara sum) should be restated once in the main text rather than relying solely on references.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below. We plan to incorporate clarifications and additional details in the revised version to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (validation): the claim of reproducing known results up to 3-loop order and generating new 3-loop fermionic reductions is presented without explicit enumeration of the tested integrals, the precise comparison protocol (symbolic identity or numerical agreement within tolerance), or code-level checks for truncation or overflow. This information is required to confirm that the reported reductions are not incomplete.

    Authors: We agree that providing more explicit details on the validation procedure would strengthen the manuscript and aid reproducibility. Although Section 3 outlines the validation by reproducing known results, we will revise it to include a comprehensive enumeration of the specific sum-integrals tested up to three loops, a clear description of the comparison protocol (using symbolic equality checks where feasible and numerical agreement to a specified precision otherwise), and documentation of the implemented checks for truncation errors and potential overflow in the C++ and Python components. These additions will be made in the revised Section 3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Laporta extension section] Section describing the Laporta extension (likely §2): the statement that the algorithm 'consistently accounts for the Matsubara sum structure' does not specify whether the discrete frequency sums are folded into the IBP generator via automatic differentiation only or whether additional discrete identities (e.g., from Matsubara periodicity, frequency shifts, or sum rules not derivable from continuous derivatives) are inserted by hand. If the latter are omitted, the reduction basis for the new fermionic cases and the claimed 2-loop factorization formula may be incomplete.

    Authors: In SIRENA, the Matsubara sum structure is accounted for by extending the IBP relations to include differentiation with respect to the continuous momentum components while respecting the discrete sum over Matsubara frequencies. The algorithm generates the necessary relations through automatic differentiation applied to the sum-integral expressions, without the need for manually inserted additional discrete identities. The periodicity and shift properties are inherently handled through the definition of the sum-integrals and the basis choice. We have cross-checked the new 3-loop fermionic reductions and the 2-loop factorization formula against independent methods to confirm their validity. In the revised manuscript, we will provide a more detailed explanation in Section 2 of how the discrete structure is incorporated via the automatic differentiation approach. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation or validation chain

full rationale

The paper implements the Laporta algorithm for sum-integrals and validates reductions by reproducing independent literature results up to 3 loops, while deriving a new 2-loop fermionic factorization formula. No step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation by construction; the algorithm is applied to external sum-integral families, and the factorization extends a prior bosonic result without redefining inputs as outputs. The central claims remain independently checkable against known external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, no explicit free parameters, domain-specific axioms, or invented entities are identifiable; the work relies on the established Laporta algorithm and standard IBP identities whose details are not elaborated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5415 in / 1315 out tokens · 71933 ms · 2026-05-11T00:45:53.187387+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We present SIRENA, a Python and C++ implementation of the Laporta algorithm for the automatic reduction of multi-loop sum-integrals via integration-by-parts identities. The method builds on established techniques for zero-temperature Feynman integrals and extends them to finite-temperature quantum field theory by consistently accounting for the Matsubara sum structure.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    In addition to the package, we derive an analytic factorization formula for arbitrary 2-loop fermionic sum-integrals, extending on a previous result for the bosonic case.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    Nishimura and Y

    M. Nishimura and Y. Schr¨ oder,IBP methods at finite temperature,JHEP09 (2012) 051, [1207.4042]. 31

    work page arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program

    P. Maierh¨ ofer, J. Usovitsch and P. Uwer,Kira—A Feynman integral reduction program,Comput. Phys. Commun.230(2018) 99–112, [1705.05610]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Laine, P

    M. Laine, P. Schicho and Y. Schr¨ oder,A QCD Debye mass in a broad temperature range,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 023532, [1911.09123]

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Soft thermal contributions to 3-loop gauge coupling

    M. Laine, P. Schicho and Y. Schr¨ oder,Soft thermal contributions to 3-loop gauge coupling,JHEP05(2018) 037, [1803.08689]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Ghiglieri, G

    J. Ghiglieri, G. D. Moore, P. Schicho and N. Schlusser,The force-force-correlator in hot QCD perturbatively and from the lattice,JHEP02(2022) 058, [2112.01407]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Navarrete and Y

    P. Navarrete and Y. Schr¨ oder,The g6 pressure of hot Yang-Mills theory: canonical form of the integrand,JHEP11(2024) 037, [2408.15830]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Thermodynamics of magnetized matter in hot and dense QCD23

    T. Gorda, P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, L. Sandbote and K. Sepp¨ anen,A new approach to determine the thermodynamics of deconfined matter to high accuracy, 2511.09627

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    K¨ arkk¨ ainen, P

    A. K¨ arkk¨ ainen, P. Navarrete, M. Nurmela, R. Paatelainen, K. Sepp¨ anen and A. Vuorinen,Quark Matter at Four Loops: Hardships and How to Overcome Them,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 021901, [2501.17921]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Brauner, T

    T. Brauner, T. V. I. Tenkanen, A. Tranberg, A. Vuorinen and D. J. Weir, Dimensional reduction of the Standard Model coupled to a new singlet scalar field, JHEP03(2017) 007, [1609.06230]

    work page arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    J. O. Andersen, T. Gorda, A. Helset, L. Niemi, T. V. I. Tenkanen, A. Tranberg et al.,Nonperturbative Analysis of the Electroweak Phase Transition in the Two Higgs Doublet Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 191802, [1711.09849]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Niemi, H

    L. Niemi, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Electroweak phase transition in the real triplet extension of the SM: Dimensional reduction,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 035002, [1802.10500]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Gorda, A

    T. Gorda, A. Helset, L. Niemi, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Three-dimensional effective theories for the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature,JHEP02(2019) 081, [1802.05056]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model

    K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T. V. I. Tenkanen and V. Vaskonen,On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model,JHEP06(2019) 075, [1904.01329]. 32

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Gould, J

    O. Gould, J. Kozaczuk, L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir,Nonperturbative analysis of the gravitational waves from a first-order electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 115024, [1903.11604]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Niemi, M

    L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and D. J. Weir, Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(2021) 171802, [2005.11332]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Gould and J

    O. Gould and J. Hirvonen,Effective field theory approach to thermal bubble nucleation,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 096015, [2108.04377]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Gould, Real scalar phase transitions: a nonperturbative analysis , JHEP 04 (2021) 057 [2101.05528]

    O. Gould,Real scalar phase transitions: a nonperturbative analysis,JHEP04 (2021) 057, [2101.05528]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    P. M. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen and J. ¨Osterman,Robust approach to thermal resummation: Standard Model meets a singlet,JHEP06(2021) 130, [2102.11145]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    L¨ ofgren, M

    J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Framework,Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(2023) 251801, [2112.05472]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Niemi, P

    L. Niemi, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Singlet-assisted electroweak phase transition at two loops,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115035, [2103.07467]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    J. E. Camargo-Molina, R. Enberg and J. L¨ ofgren,A new perspective on the electroweak phase transition in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,JHEP 10(2021) 127, [2103.14022]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Niemi, K

    L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, R. Sepp¨ a and D. J. Weir,Infrared physics of the 3D SU(2) adjoint Higgs model at the crossover transition,JHEP02(2023) 212, [2206.14487]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Ekstedt, P

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,DRalgo: A package for effective field theory approach for thermal phase transitions,Comput. Phys. Commun.288 (2023) 108725, [2205.08815]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Ekstedt,Convergence of the nucleation rate for first-order phase transitions,Phys

    A. Ekstedt,Convergence of the nucleation rate for first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 095026, [2205.05145]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Ekstedt, O

    A. Ekstedt, O. Gould and J. L¨ ofgren,Radiative first-order phase transitions to next-to-next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 036012, [2205.07241]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Biondini, P

    S. Biondini, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Strong electroweak phase transition in t-channel simplified dark matter models,JCAP10(2022) 044, [2207.12207]. 33

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Gould, S

    O. Gould, S. G¨ uyer and K. Rummukainen,First-order electroweak phase transitions: A nonperturbative update,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 114507, [2205.07238]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Schicho, T

    P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen and G. White,Combining thermal resummation and gauge invariance for electroweak phase transition,JHEP11(2022) 047, [2203.04284]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Gould and C

    O. Gould and C. Xie,Higher orders for cosmological phase transitions: a global study in a Yukawa model,JHEP12(2023) 049, [2310.02308]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Kierkla, B

    M. Kierkla, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen and J. van de Vis,Gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions: dimensional transmutation meets dimensional reduction,JHEP02(2024) 234, [2312.12413]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Chala, J

    M. Chala, J. C. Criado, L. Gil and J. L. Miras,Higher-order-operator corrections to phase-transition parameters in dimensional reduction,JHEP10(2024) 025, [2406.02667]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Niemi, M

    L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Xia,Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115016, [2405.01191]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Qin and L

    R. Qin and L. Bian,First-order electroweak phase transition at finite density, JHEP08(2024) 157, [2407.01981]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Niemi and T

    L. Niemi and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Investigating two-loop effects for first-order electroweak phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 075034, [2408.15912]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Camargo-Molina, R

    E. Camargo-Molina, R. Enberg and J. L¨ ofgren,A catalog of first-order electroweak phase transitions in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory,JHEP08(2025) 113, [2410.23210]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Gould and P

    O. Gould and P. M. Saffin,Perturbative gravitational wave predictions for the real-scalar extended Standard Model,JHEP03(2025) 105, [2411.08951]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Chakrabortty and S

    J. Chakrabortty and S. Mohanty,One Loop Thermal Effective Action,Nucl. Phys. B1020(2025) 117165, [2411.14146]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Kierkla, P

    M. Kierkla, P. Schicho, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen and J. van de Vis, Finite-temperature bubble nucleation with shifting scale hierarchies,JHEP07 (2025) 153, [2503.13597]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Chala, L

    M. Chala, L. Gil and Z. Ren,Phase transitions in dimensional reduction up to three loops,Chin. Phys.49(2025) 123105, [2505.14335]. 34

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Bernardo, P

    F. Bernardo, P. Klose, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Higher-dimensional operators at finite temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions,JHEP08 (2025) 109, [2503.18904]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    The High-Temperature Limit of the SM(EFT)

    M. Chala and G. Guedes,The high-temperature limit of the SM(EFT),JHEP07 (2025) 085, [2503.20016]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Chala, M

    M. Chala, M. C. Fiore and L. Gil,Hot news on the phase-structure of the SMEFT, 2507.16905

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    V. Keus, L. Lewitt and J. Thomson-Cooke,Electroweak phase transition enhanced by a CP-violating dark sector,2511.04636

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Jahedi, I

    S. Jahedi, I. Saha and A. Sarkar,Electroweak phase transition in SMEFT: Gravitational wave and collider complementarity,2512.04168

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Gauge-independent treatment of electroweak phase transition,2512.05565

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    X.-X. Li, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen and Y. Wu,An Effective Sphaleron Awakens,2506.01585

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Annala, K

    J. Annala, K. Rummukainen and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Nonperturbative determination of the sphaleron rate for first-order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D 113(2026) 016014, [2506.04939]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Bhatnagar, D

    A. Bhatnagar, D. Croon and P. Schicho,Interpreting the 95 GeV resonance in the Two Higgs Doublet Model: Implications for the Electroweak Phase Transition, 2506.20716

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Biek¨ otter, A

    T. Biek¨ otter, A. Dashko, M. L¨ oschner and G. Weiglein,Perturbative aspects of the electroweak phase transition with a complex singlet and implications for gravitational wave predictions,2511.14831

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Chala, A

    M. Chala, A. Dashko and G. Guedes,Running Couplings in High-Temperature Effective Field Theory,2510.26878

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Towards Accurate Gravitational Wave Predictions: Gauge-Invariant Nucleation in the Electroweak Phase Transition,2601.05793

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Bernardo, M

    F. Bernardo, M. Chala, L. Gil and P. Schicho,Hard thermal contributions to phase transition observables at NNLO,2602.06962

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    P. H. Ginsparg,First Order and Second Order Phase Transitions in Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B170(1980) 388–408. 35

    1980

  55. [55]

    Appelquist and R

    T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski,High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2305

    1981

  56. [56]

    Gould and T

    O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Perturbative effective field theory expansions for cosmological phase transitions,JHEP01(2024) 048, [2309.01672]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Gould, A

    O. Gould, A. Kormu and D. J. Weir,Nonperturbative test of nucleation calculations for strong phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L051901, [2404.01876]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Is There a Hot Electroweak Phase Transition at $m_H\gsim m_W$?

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov,Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887–2890, [hep-ph/9605288]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  59. [59]

    Gurtler, E.-M

    M. Gurtler, E.-M. Ilgenfritz and A. Schiller,Where the electroweak phase transition ends,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3888–3895, [hep-lat/9704013]

    work page arXiv 1997

  60. [60]

    Csikor, Z

    F. Csikor, Z. Fodor and J. Heitger,Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 21–24, [hep-ph/9809291]

    work page arXiv 1999

  61. [61]

    Matchotter: An Automated Tool for Dimensional Reduction at Finite Temperature

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, J. L´ opez Miras and A. Moreno-S´ anchez,Matchotter: An Automated Tool for Dimensional Reduction at Finite Temperature,2604.21972

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Matsubara,A New approach to quantum statistical mechanics,Prog

    T. Matsubara,A New approach to quantum statistical mechanics,Prog. Theor. Phys.14(1955) 351–378

    1955

  63. [63]

    A. I. Davydychev, P. Navarrete and Y. Schr¨ oder,Factorizing two-loop vacuum sum-integrals,JHEP02(2024) 104, [2312.17367]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Ghisoiu and Y

    I. Ghisoiu and Y. Schr¨ oder,A New Method for Taming Tensor Sum-Integrals, JHEP11(2012) 010, [1208.0284]

    work page arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Navarrete and Y

    P. Navarrete and Y. Schr¨ oder,Tackling the infamousg 6 term of the QCD pressure, PoSLL2022(2022) 014, [2207.10151]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    P. B. Arnold and C.-x. Zhai,The Three loop free energy for high temperature QED and QCD with fermions,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 1906–1918, [hep-ph/9410360]

    work page arXiv 1995

  67. [67]

    P. B. Arnold and C.-X. Zhai,The Three loop free energy for pure gauge QCD, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7603–7623, [hep-ph/9408276]

    work page arXiv 1994

  68. [68]

    Gynther, M

    A. Gynther, M. Laine, Y. Schr¨ oder, C. Torrero and A. Vuorinen,Four-loop pressure of massless O(N) scalar field theory,JHEP04(2007) 094, [hep-ph/0703307]. 36

    work page arXiv 2007

  69. [69]

    J. O. Andersen and L. Kyllingstad,Four-loop Screened Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 076008, [0805.4478]

    work page arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    Moller and Y

    J. Moller and Y. Schr¨ oder,Open problems in hot QCD,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 205-206(2010) 218–223, [1007.1223]

    work page arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Ghisoiu and Y

    I. Ghisoiu and Y. Schr¨ oder,A new three-loop sum-integral of mass dimension two, JHEP09(2012) 016, [1207.6214]

    work page arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    Three-loop matching coefficients for hot QCD: Reduction and gauge independence

    J. Moller and Y. Schr¨ oder,Three-loop matching coefficients for hot QCD: Reduction and gauge independence,JHEP08(2012) 025, [1207.1309]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  73. [73]

    Schr¨ oder,A fresh look on three-loop sum-integrals,JHEP08(2012) 095, [1207.5666]

    Y. Schr¨ oder,A fresh look on three-loop sum-integrals,JHEP08(2012) 095, [1207.5666]

    work page arXiv 2012

  74. [74]

    Ghisoiu,Three-loop Debye mass and effective coupling in thermal QCD

    I. Ghisoiu,Three-loop Debye mass and effective coupling in thermal QCD. PhD thesis, U. Bielefeld (main), 2013

    2013

  75. [75]

    Ghisoiu, J

    I. Ghisoiu, J. Moller and Y. Schr¨ oder,Debye screening mass of hot Yang-Mills theory to three-loop order,JHEP11(2015) 121, [1509.08727]

    work page arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    collinear

    A. I. Davydychev and Y. Schr¨ oder,Recursion-free solution for two-loop vacuum integrals with “collinear” masses,JHEP12(2022) 047, [2210.10593]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Sepp¨ anen,Quark Matter Thermodynamics from High-Order Perturbative QCD

    K. Sepp¨ anen,Quark Matter Thermodynamics from High-Order Perturbative QCD. PhD thesis, Helsinki U., 2025

    2025

  78. [78]

    Navarrete, R

    P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, K. Sepp¨ anen and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Cosmological phase transitions without high-temperature expansions,JHEP01(2026) 113, [2507.07014]

    work page arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Anastasiou and A

    C. Anastasiou and A. Lazopoulos,Automatic integral reduction for higher order perturbative calculations,JHEP07(2004) 046, [hep-ph/0404258]

    work page arXiv 2004

  80. [80]

    A. V. Smirnov and M. Zeng,FIRE 7: Automatic Reduction with Modular Approach,2510.07150

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.