pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07619 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Typical Mixing and Rare-State Bottlenecks in Open Quantum Systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords open quantum systemsmixing timetrace distancetypicalityHaar-random statesrare-state bottlenecksrelaxation dynamicsLindblad evolution
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Broad ensembles of initial states in open quantum systems show concentrated trace-distance relaxation and mixing times around a deterministic mean.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that mixing times in open quantum systems, often set by rare worst-case states, actually concentrate for typical states drawn from broad unstructured ensembles. For Haar-random pure states, the instantaneous trace distance to the steady state concentrates at any fixed time, so typical relaxation curves bundle along the distance axis. This vertical concentration turns into horizontal concentration of the mixing time whenever the mean curve crosses a threshold with finite slope. The typical mixing timescale separates from the worst-case benchmark according to a rare-state bottleneck law governed by the logarithmic ratio of extremal to typical overlaps with the slow left eigenoperator, producing different hierarchies in skin-effect, boundary, and protected-sector settings. The result extends typicality to the non-observable quantity of mixing time and applies to other ensembles like unitary designs.

Core claim

For broad unstructured ensembles the nonlinear trace-distance relaxation curve itself concentrates around a deterministic mean. For Haar-random pure states this yields fixed-time concentration of the instantaneous trace distance to the steady state, which we term vertical concentration since typical relaxation curves bundle along the distance axis. Whenever the mean curve crosses the distance threshold with a finite slope, it converts this vertical concentration into a horizontal concentration of the mixing time, extending typicality from standard physical observables to a fundamentally non-observable dynamical quantity. In a one-mode tail regime, the separation between typical and worst-ca

What carries the argument

The rare-state bottleneck law that determines the typical-to-worst-case separation of mixing times via the logarithmic ratio of extremal to typical overlaps with the slow left eigenoperator, building on vertical concentration of trace-distance relaxation.

If this is right

  • Typical mixing times are set by the mean relaxation curve crossing the distance threshold rather than by exponentially rare outliers.
  • The typical-to-worst-case separation follows a logarithmic hierarchy in skin-effect systems, linear hierarchy for boundary-supported slow modes, and exponential hierarchy in protected-sector families.
  • The concentration of mixing times holds for Haar-random states and carries over to exact and approximate unitary 2-designs as well as Hilbert-Schmidt and induced ensembles.
  • Mixing time becomes a typical quantity with high probability for unstructured initial states, allowing dynamical properties to inherit concentration from physical observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental runs starting from effectively random states should observe mixing times close to the ensemble mean rather than the conservative worst-case bound.
  • The framework indicates that protecting an entire system against slow mixing requires addressing stagnation in the rare-state tail, not just average behavior.
  • Robustness to approximate designs suggests the concentration survives small experimental imperfections in state preparation.
  • The same vertical-to-horizontal conversion may apply to other non-observable dynamical quantities such as the decay of higher-order correlations.

Load-bearing premise

Initial states belong to broad unstructured ensembles such as Haar-random pure states and the system operates in a one-mode tail regime where separation is controlled by the logarithmic ratio of extremal to typical overlaps.

What would settle it

Numerical sampling of many Haar-random initial states in a concrete Lindblad system showing that the distribution of mixing times fails to concentrate sharply around the mean curve or deviates from the predicted logarithmic overlap ratio.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07619 by Caisheng Cheng, Ruicheng Bao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Left: fixed-rate single-particle skin baseline. Boundary localization keeps the extremal slow overlap of order one, while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Mixing in open quantum systems is often summarized by a single worst-case time, even though that benchmark can be set by exponentially rare initial states. We show that for broad unstructured ensembles the nonlinear trace-distance relaxation curve itself concentrates around a deterministic mean. For Haar-random pure states this yields fixed-time concentration of the instantaneous trace distance to the steady state, which we term vertical concentration since typical relaxation curves bundle along the distance axis. Whenever the mean curve crosses the distance threshold with a finite slope, it converts this vertical concentration into a horizontal concentration of the mixing time, extending typicality from standard physical observables to a fundamentally non-observable dynamical quantity. This sharp concentration naturally raises the question of how the typical mixing timescale compares to the worst-case benchmark. We show that in a one-mode tail regime, this separation is controlled by the logarithmic ratio of extremal to typical initial-state overlaps for the slow left eigenoperator. This rare-state bottleneck law yields a hierarchy that is logarithmic in skin-effect settings, linear for boundary-supported many-body slow modes, and exponential in a protected-sector family where generic states mix rapidly while rare states stagnate. The framework also extends beyond Haar to exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and Hilbert-Schmidt/induced ensembles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a framework for understanding typical mixing dynamics in open quantum systems. It demonstrates that for Haar-random pure states and other broad ensembles, the trace-distance relaxation curves concentrate around a deterministic mean at fixed times, referred to as vertical concentration. Under the condition that the mean curve crosses the threshold with finite slope, this leads to concentration of the mixing time, termed horizontal concentration. The paper derives a rare-state bottleneck law in the one-mode tail regime, where the typical-to-worst-case separation is determined by the logarithmic ratio of overlaps with the slow left eigenoperator. This results in different scaling hierarchies: logarithmic for skin-effect systems, linear for boundary-supported slow modes, and exponential for protected-sector families. The results are extended to unitary 2-designs and other ensembles.

Significance. If the mathematical derivations are confirmed, this work is significant as it extends the concept of typicality to non-observable dynamical quantities such as mixing times in open quantum systems. The identification of vertical and horizontal concentration provides a clear mechanism for how ensemble averaging affects relaxation dynamics. The rare-state bottleneck law offers a parameter-free explanation for the separation between typical and worst-case behaviors, with concrete hierarchies that can guide experimental and theoretical studies in quantum many-body systems, skin effects, and protected sectors. The conditional statements and extension to multiple ensembles enhance the robustness of the claims. The paper's strength lies in its rigorous treatment of concentration phenomena without introducing ad-hoc parameters.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract introduces 'vertical concentration' and 'horizontal concentration' without immediate definition; a short paragraph in the introduction defining these terms with reference to the trace-distance threshold would improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the distinction.
  2. The one-mode tail regime is central to the bottleneck law but its precise mathematical definition (e.g., the condition on the overlap distribution or the dominance of a single slow mode) should be stated explicitly with an equation early in the relevant section to avoid ambiguity in applying the logarithmic ratio.
  3. While the extension to 2-designs is noted, a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the concentration bounds for Haar vs. approximate 2-designs would help clarify the robustness of the results across ensembles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and detailed summary of our work on typical mixing and rare-state bottlenecks in open quantum systems. We appreciate the recognition of the significance of vertical and horizontal concentration phenomena as well as the rare-state bottleneck law. No specific major comments were listed in the report, so we have no point-by-point responses to provide. We are prepared to make any minor revisions requested by the editor or in a full referee report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from standard definitions of trace distance, eigenoperator overlaps, and concentration properties of Haar-random states (and 2-designs) under the one-mode tail regime. Vertical concentration follows from fixed-time typicality of the distance observable, and horizontal concentration of mixing time is obtained only conditionally on finite slope of the mean curve; the rare-state bottleneck is expressed directly as a logarithmic ratio of extremal-to-typical overlaps without any fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction. No self-definitional loops, ansatz smuggling via citation, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the chain; the framework remains self-contained against external benchmarks of random-matrix and open-system theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only view yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the one-mode tail regime may function as an ad-hoc modeling choice whose justification requires the full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5518 in / 1184 out tokens · 51455 ms · 2026-05-11T02:25:41.763355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2001)

  2. [2]

    Quantum generalizations of glauber and metropolis dynamics,

    A. Gily´ en, C.-F. Chen, J. F. Doriguello, and M. J. Kasto- ryano, Quantum generalizations of glauber and metropo- lis dynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20322 (2024)

  3. [4]

    H. Wang, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum algorithm for simulating the dynamics of an open quantum system, Phys. Rev. A83, 062317 (2011)

  4. [5]

    M. v. d. Worm, B. C. Sawyer, J. J. Bollinger, and M. Kastner, Relaxation timescales and decay of corre- lations in a long-range interacting quantum simulator, New Journal of Physics15, 083007 (2013)

  5. [6]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum sim- ulation, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

  6. [7]

    C. Chen, M. Kastoryano, F. Brand˜ ao,et al., Efficient quantum thermal simulation, Nature646, 561 (2025)

  7. [8]

    C.-F. Chen, M. J. Kastoryano, F. G. Brand˜ ao, and A. Gily´ en, Quantum thermal state preparation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18224 (2023)

  8. [9]

    Ding, C.-F

    Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033147 (2024)

  9. [10]

    X. Mi, A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. Miao, P. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, T. Ander- 6 sen,et al., Stable quantum-correlated many-body states through engineered dissipation, Science383, 1332 (2024)

  10. [11]

    Lin, Dissipative preparation of many-body quantum states: Toward practical quantum advantage, APL Com- putational Physics1, 010901 (2025)

    L. Lin, Dissipative preparation of many-body quantum states: Toward practical quantum advantage, APL Com- putational Physics1, 010901 (2025)

  11. [12]

    H. T. Quan, Y. D. Wang, Y.-x. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Maxwell’s demon assisted thermodynamic cycle in superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180402 (2006)

  12. [13]

    H. T. Quan, Y.-x. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E76, 031105 (2007)

  13. [14]

    H. T. Quan, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quan- tum heat engines. ii., Phys. Rev. E79, 041129 (2009)

  14. [15]

    J. Wang, J. He, and Y. Ma, Finite-time performance of a quantum heat engine with a squeezed thermal bath, Phys. Rev. E100, 052126 (2019)

  15. [16]

    J. Liu, K. A. Jung, and D. Segal, Periodically driven quantum thermal machines from warming up to limit cy- cle, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 200602 (2021)

  16. [17]

    Diaconis, The cutoff phenomenon in finite markov chains., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 1659 (1996)

    P. Diaconis, The cutoff phenomenon in finite markov chains., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 1659 (1996)

  17. [18]

    M. J. Kastoryano, D. Reeb, and M. M. Wolf, A cut- off phenomenon for quantum markov chains, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 075307 (2012)

  18. [19]

    T. S. Cubitt, A. Lucia, S. Michalakis, and D. Perez- Garcia, Stability of local quantum dissipative systems, Communications in Mathematical Physics337, 1275 (2015)

  19. [20]

    Bardet, A

    I. Bardet, A. Capel, L. Gao, A. Lucia, D. P´ erez- Garc´ ıa, and C. Rouz´ e, Rapid thermalization of spin chain commuting hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 060401 (2023)

  20. [21]

    Optimal quantum algorithm for Gibbs state preparation

    C. Rouz´ e, D. S. Fran¸ ca, and´A. M. Alhambra, Optimal quantum algorithm for gibbs state preparation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04885 (2024)

  21. [22]

    Z. Ding, B. Li, and L. Lin, Efficient quantum gibbs sam- plers with kubo–martin–schwinger detailed balance con- dition, Communications in Mathematical Physics406, 67 (2025)

  22. [23]

    Kochanowski, A

    J. Kochanowski, A. M. Alhambra, A. Capel, and C. Rouz´ e, Rapid thermalization of dissipative many-body dynamics of commuting hamiltonians, Communications in Mathematical Physics406, 176 (2025)

  23. [24]

    Alhambra

    M. Scandi and ´A. M. Alhambra, Thermalization in open many-body systems and kms detailed balance, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20064 (2025)

  24. [25]

    Tong and Y

    Y. Tong and Y. Zhan, Fast mixing of weakly interacting fermionic systems at any temperature, PRX Quantum6, 030301 (2025)

  25. [26]

    D. Fang, J. Lu, and Y. Tong, Mixing time of open quan- tum systems via hypocoercivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 140405 (2025)

  26. [27]

    Lu and O

    Z. Lu and O. Raz, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the markovian mpemba effect and its inverse, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 5083 (2017)

  27. [28]

    Klich, O

    I. Klich, O. Raz, O. Hirschberg, and M. Vucelja, Mpemba index and anomalous relaxation, Physical Review X9, 021060 (2019)

  28. [29]

    Carollo, A

    F. Carollo, A. Lasanta, and I. Lesanovsky, Exponentially accelerated approach to stationarity in markovian open quantum systems through the mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 060401 (2021)

  29. [30]

    Moroder, O

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, Thermodynamics of the quantum mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)

  30. [31]

    Bao and Z

    R. Bao and Z. Hou, Accelerating quantum relaxation via temporary reset: A mpemba-inspired approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 150403 (2025)

  31. [32]

    T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Liouvillian skin effect: Slowing down of relaxation pro- cesses without gap closing, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 070402 (2021)

  32. [33]

    Z. Wang, Y. Lu, Y. Peng, R. Qi, Y. Wang, and J. Jie, Ac- celerating relaxation dynamics in open quantum systems with liouvillian skin effect, Phys. Rev. B108, 054313 (2023)

  33. [34]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai, Resolving a discrepancy be- tween liouvillian gap and relaxation time in boundary- dissipated quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230604 (2020)

  34. [35]

    Mori, Metastability associated with many-body explo- sion of eigenmode expansion coefficients, Phys

    T. Mori, Metastability associated with many-body explo- sion of eigenmode expansion coefficients, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043137 (2021)

  35. [36]

    Chru´ sci´ nski, G

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski, G. Kimura, A. Kossakowski, and Y. Shishido, Universal constraint for relaxation rates for quantum dynamical semigroup, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 050401 (2021)

  36. [37]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai, Symmetrized liouvillian gap in markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 230404 (2023)

  37. [38]

    Shirai and T

    T. Shirai and T. Mori, Accelerated decay due to opera- tor spreading in bulk-dissipated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 040201 (2024)

  38. [39]

    R. Bao, C. Du, Z. Cao, and Z. Hou, Universal trade-off between irreversibility and intrinsic timescale in thermal relaxation with applications to thermodynamic inference, Phys. Rev. E112, 044134 (2025)

  39. [40]

    Mori, Liouvillian-gap analysis of open quantum many- body systems in the weak dissipation limit, Phys

    T. Mori, Liouvillian-gap analysis of open quantum many- body systems in the weak dissipation limit, Phys. Rev. B109, 064311 (2024)

  40. [41]

    F. Ares, P. Calabrese, and S. Murciano, The quantum mpemba effects, Nature Reviews Physics7, 451 (2025)

  41. [42]

    Gal and O

    A. Gal and O. Raz, Precooling strategy allows exponen- tially faster heating, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 060602 (2020)

  42. [43]

    Kumar and J

    A. Kumar and J. Bechhoefer, Exponentially faster cool- ing in a colloidal system, Nature584, 64 (2020)

  43. [44]

    G. Teza, R. Yaacoby, and O. Raz, Relaxation short- cuts through boundary coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 017101 (2023)

  44. [45]

    F. J. Schwarzendahl and H. L¨ owen, Anomalous cooling and overcooling of active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 138002 (2022)

  45. [46]

    Z. Cao, R. Bao, J. Zheng, and Z. Hou, Fast functionalization with high performance in the au- tonomous information engine, The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry Letters14, 66 (2023), pMID: 36566388, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03335

  46. [47]

    R. Bao, Z. Cao, J. Zheng, and Z. Hou, Designing autonomous maxwell’s demon via stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043066 (2023)

  47. [48]

    N. Ohga, H. Hayakawa, and S. Ito, Microscopic theory of mpemba effects and a no-mpemba theorem for monotone many-body systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06623 7 (2024)

  48. [49]

    Pagare and Z

    A. Pagare and Z. Lu, Mpemba-like sensory withdrawal effect, PRX Life2, 043019 (2024)

  49. [50]

    Van Vu and H

    T. Van Vu and H. Hayakawa, Thermomajorization mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 107101 (2025)

  50. [51]

    Nava and R

    A. Nava and R. Egger, Pontus-mpemba effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 140404 (2025)

  51. [52]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. u. u. u. u. Gut ¸˘ a, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Towards a theory of metastability in open quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 240404 (2016)

  52. [53]

    Macieszczak, D

    K. Macieszczak, D. C. Rose, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Theory of classical metastability in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033047 (2021)

  53. [54]

    Bao, Initial-state typicality in quantum relaxation, Physical Review Letters136, 070402 (2026)

    R. Bao, Initial-state typicality in quantum relaxation, Physical Review Letters136, 070402 (2026)

  54. [55]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nature Physics2, 754 (2006)

  55. [56]

    Hayden, D

    P. Hayden, D. W. Leung, and A. Winter, Aspects of generic entanglement, Communications in mathematical physics265, 95 (2006)

  56. [57]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh` ı, Canonical typicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 050403 (2006)

  57. [58]

    Linden, S

    N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Quan- tum mechanical evolution towards thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. E79, 061103 (2009)

  58. [59]

    Bartsch and J

    C. Bartsch and J. Gemmer, Dynamical typicality of quantum expectation values, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 110403 (2009)

  59. [60]

    Riddell, N

    J. Riddell, N. J. Pagliaroli, and ´A. M. Alhambra, Con- centration of quantum equilibration and an estimate of the recurrence time, SciPost Physics15, 165 (2023)

  60. [61]

    See Supplemental Material at [url] for complementary derivations

  61. [62]

    B. J. Brown, D. Loss, J. K. Pachos, C. N. Self, and J. R. Wootton, Quantum memories at finite temperature, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045005 (2016)

  62. [63]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 4452 (2002)

  63. [64]

    B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 307 (2015)

  64. [65]

    Temme, M

    K. Temme, M. J. Kastoryano, M. B. Ruskai, M. M. Wolf, and F. Verstraete, The divergence and mixing times of quantum markov processes, Journal of Mathematical Physics51(2010)

  65. [66]

    C.-F. Chen, M. J. Kastoryano, and A. Gily´ en, An effi- cient and exact noncommutative quantum gibbs sampler, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09207 (2023)

  66. [67]

    Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Rapid quantum ground state prepa- ration via dissipative dynamics, Physical Review X16, 011004 (2026)

  67. [68]

    Kochsiek, F

    S. Kochsiek, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Accelerat- ing the approach of dissipative quantum spin systems towards stationarity through global spin rotations, Phys. Rev. A106, 012207 (2022)

  68. [69]

    G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects, Physics Reports 1164, 1 (2026)

  69. [70]

    M. J. Kastoryano and K. Temme, Quantum logarithmic sobolev inequalities and rapid mixing, Journal of Math- ematical Physics54(2013)

  70. [71]

    Dankert, R

    C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Ex- act and approximate unitary 2-designs and their applica- tion to fidelity estimation, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics80, 012304 (2009)

  71. [73]

    L. Cui, T. Schuster, F. Brandao, and H.-Y. Huang, Uni- tary designs in nearly optimal depth, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06216 (2025)

  72. [74]

    Huang, S

    H.-Y. Huang, S. Choi, J. R. McClean, and J. Preskill, The vast world of quantum advantage, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05720 (2025)

  73. [75]

    Typical Mixing and Rare-State Bottlenecks in Open Quantum Systems

    Https://github.com/Ustcmilkquamtum/code-for- Typical-Mixing-and-Rare-State-Bottlenecks-in-Open- Quantum-Systems.git. End Matter For the full Haar ensemble, the barycenter is the max- imally mixed state. This barycenter defines a determin- istic reference trajectory,ρ ref =E Haar[|ψ⟩⟨ψ|], h t := ∥Λt (ρref)−σ∥ 1 , t ref(ε) := inf{t≥0 :h t ≤ε}. Be- cause the...

  74. [76]

    Taking the supremum over suchtproves (S95)

    Thenρ 0 =P j pj |Ψj⟩⟨Ψj|, so convexity of the trace norm gives 2 1− 1 D e−ηLt = etLL(ρ0)−σ L 1 ≤ X j pj gt(Ψj)≤sup j gt(Ψj).(S105) Hence for everyt < η −1 L log(2(1−1/D)/ε), somejsatisfiesg t(Ψj)> ε. Taking the supremum over suchtproves (S95). Letρ ψ :=|ψ⟩⟨ψ|, and define the reduced statesρ log(ψ) := Trsyn(ρψ), ρ syn(ψ) := Trlog(ρψ).Introduce the corre- l...

  75. [77]

    A. A. Mele, Introduction to haar measure tools in quantum information: A beginner’s tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024)

  76. [78]

    Ledoux,The concentration of measure phenomenon, 89 (American Mathematical Soc., 2001)

    M. Ledoux,The concentration of measure phenomenon, 89 (American Mathematical Soc., 2001)

  77. [79]

    E. B. Davies, Markovian master equations, Communications in mathematical Physics39, 91 (1974)

  78. [80]

    M. J. Kastoryano and F. G. Brandao, Quantum gibbs samplers: The commuting case, Communications in Mathematical Physics344, 915 (2016)

  79. [81]

    Bardet, A

    I. Bardet, A. Capel, L. Gao, A. Lucia, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, and C. Rouz´ e, Rapid thermalization of spin chain commuting hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 060401 (2023)

  80. [82]

    Dankert, R

    C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics80, 012304 (2009)

Showing first 80 references.