pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08569 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· nucl-th

Recognition: no theorem link

The Good, the Bad, and the Subtle: Relativistic mode sums for neutron-star tidal response

Abhishek Hegade K. R., Hang Yu, K.J. Kwon, Nicolas Yunes, Tejaswi Venumadhav

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEnucl-th
keywords neutron starstidal responsegravitational wavesf-modesgeneral relativitymode sumsRegge-Wheeler gaugebinary inspirals
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relativistic mode sums for neutron-star tides reproduce direct calculations to within 3 percent for the dominant f-mode.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a relativistic version of the mode-sum approach to compute how non-rotating neutron stars deform under tidal forces from a binary companion. It defines the interior tidal field, overlap integrals, and mode amplitudes using near-zone boundary conditions in Regge-Wheeler gauge. The work finds that the leading f-mode term matches more complete direct calculations to within about 3 percent across several equations of state. It also identifies that the inner-product operator is not positive definite, so truncated sums are not guaranteed to converge, and that the interior tidal field itself is not unique. A reader would care because these responses enter gravitational-wave signals from merging neutron stars and can reveal the stars' internal structure.

Core claim

We develop a practical relativistic implementation of mode-sum tidal response for non-rotating neutron stars in Regge-Wheeler gauge. Using near-zone boundary conditions, we systematically define the interior tidal field, the relativistic overlap integrals, and the corresponding mode amplitudes. The dominant f-mode contribution is remarkably robust, reproducing the direct matching calculation to within ∼3% across the equations of state we consider. The operator governing mode inner product is not positive definite on the full Regge-Wheeler-gauge function space, so the relativistic mode sum truncated at O(ω²) is not expected to strictly converge to the direct matching solution. The tidal field

What carries the argument

Relativistic mode-sum approximation in Regge-Wheeler gauge, where near-zone boundary conditions define the interior tidal field and overlap integrals that set the mode amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The f-mode term alone supplies a usable approximation to the full tidal response.
  • Truncated mode sums at O(ω²) are not expected to converge strictly to the direct solution because the inner-product operator is not positive definite.
  • Ambiguity in the definition of the interior tidal field produces only limited changes to the dominant f-mode contribution.
  • The method's predictive power rests on a controlled low-mode description rather than a formally convergent strong-field expansion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This controlled low-mode approach could be incorporated into gravitational-wave template banks to improve extraction of neutron-star properties from merger signals.
  • Testing the reported 3 percent agreement against full numerical-relativity evolutions of binary neutron-star inspirals would directly check the robustness claim.
  • Alternative choices for the interior tidal-field definition or gauge might reduce the impact of the non-positive-definite inner product and allow controlled inclusion of higher modes.

Load-bearing premise

That near-zone boundary conditions suffice to define a usable interior tidal field and that the ambiguity in this definition has only limited impact on the dominant f-mode response.

What would settle it

A numerical-relativity simulation or direct matching calculation for one of the considered equations of state that yields an f-mode contribution differing from the mode-sum result by more than 3 percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08569 by Abhishek Hegade K. R., Hang Yu, K.J. Kwon, Nicolas Yunes, Tejaswi Venumadhav.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Cartoon depiction of our first toy problem: a string [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Difference in rate of convergence of mode-sum expres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Difference in rate of convergence of the mode sum for the toy model discussed in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents a comparison between the f-mode frequencies obtained using the procedure described in Sec. III G and the real part of the QNM frequencies for the SLY EoS as a function of compactness. The orange curve in the figure represents the mode frequencies calcu￾lated using the relativistic Cowling approximation, which is well-known to exhibit errors of O(10−25)% when com￾pared to the QNM frequencies. We re… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between profiles of various metric and fluid variables for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation in the profile of the tidal field inside the star for different choices of the basis functions [Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Non-convergence of the relativistic mode sum. As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-dependent tidal interactions during the late inspiral of binary neutron stars encode valuable information about neutron-star structure, but systematically extending the familiar Newtonian mode-sum picture into full general relativity is nontrivial. In this paper, we develop a practical relativistic implementation of mode-sum tidal response for non-rotating neutron stars in Regge-Wheeler gauge. Using near-zone boundary conditions, we systematically define the interior tidal field, the relativistic overlap integrals, and the corresponding mode amplitudes. The good is that the dominant f-mode contribution is remarkably robust, reproducing the direct matching calculation to within $\sim 3$\% across the equations of state we consider. The bad is that the operator governing mode inner product is not positive definite on the full Regge-Wheeler-gauge function space, so the relativistic mode sum truncated at ${\cal{O}}(\omega^2)$ is not expected to strictly converge to the direct matching solution. The subtle is that the tidal field inside the star is not unique, although this ambiguity has only a limited impact on the dominant f-mode response for the classes of extensions studied here. Our results establish the practical utility of relativistic mode-sum approximations, while making clear that their predictive power comes from a controlled low-mode description, rather than from a formally convergent strong-field expansion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a relativistic mode-sum formalism for the tidal response of non-rotating neutron stars in Regge-Wheeler gauge, employing near-zone boundary conditions to define the interior tidal field, overlap integrals, and mode amplitudes. It reports that the dominant f-mode contribution reproduces results from direct matching calculations to within ~3% across the equations of state considered, while explicitly noting that the inner-product operator is not positive definite (so the O(ω²)-truncated sum is not expected to converge) and that the interior tidal field definition carries an ambiguity whose impact on the f-mode is stated to be limited.

Significance. If the reported numerical robustness of the f-mode holds, the work supplies a practical, controlled low-mode approximation that extends Newtonian mode-sum ideas into full GR without requiring a formally convergent strong-field expansion. This could be useful for modeling tidal effects in late-inspiral gravitational-wave signals. The paper earns credit for its transparent discussion of the non-convergence issue and the tidal-field ambiguity, which clarifies the boundaries of the approximation rather than overstating its formal validity.

major comments (2)
  1. [abstract and §5] The robustness claim for the f-mode (abstract and §5) rests on ~3% agreement with direct matching, yet the manuscript itself states that the truncated mode sum is not expected to converge because the inner-product operator is not positive definite on the full Regge-Wheeler-gauge function space. This tension requires a quantitative demonstration that the observed agreement is not an artifact of the specific near-zone boundary conditions or the limited EOS sample; without such a test the central practical-utility conclusion remains only partially substantiated.
  2. [§4] §4 (tidal-field definition): the interior tidal field is acknowledged to be non-unique, but the manuscript provides only a qualitative statement that the ambiguity has limited impact on the dominant f-mode response. A concrete bound on how variations in the near-zone matching affect the overlap integrals and the resulting 3% discrepancy would be needed to confirm that the f-mode result is stable under the admitted freedom.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure that all numerical comparisons (e.g., the 3% figure) are accompanied by explicit statements of the truncation order and the precise definition of the direct-matching reference solution.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate which EOS models and which truncation level are shown, to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make revisions to provide the requested quantitative support while preserving the transparent discussion of the approximation's limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract and §5] The robustness claim for the f-mode (abstract and §5) rests on ~3% agreement with direct matching, yet the manuscript itself states that the truncated mode sum is not expected to converge because the inner-product operator is not positive definite on the full Regge-Wheeler-gauge function space. This tension requires a quantitative demonstration that the observed agreement is not an artifact of the specific near-zone boundary conditions or the limited EOS sample; without such a test the central practical-utility conclusion remains only partially substantiated.

    Authors: We acknowledge the tension between the empirical ~3% agreement and the formal non-convergence, which the manuscript already flags explicitly as a limitation of the approach. The reported agreement is presented as a practical observation for the dominant f-mode rather than evidence of formal convergence. To address the concern that this may be an artifact, we will revise the manuscript to include additional quantitative tests: we will expand the EOS sample with at least two further equations of state and add a sensitivity study varying the near-zone cutoff parameters. These additions will demonstrate that the f-mode agreement remains stable at the ~3% level. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (tidal-field definition): the interior tidal field is acknowledged to be non-unique, but the manuscript provides only a qualitative statement that the ambiguity has limited impact on the dominant f-mode response. A concrete bound on how variations in the near-zone matching affect the overlap integrals and the resulting 3% discrepancy would be needed to confirm that the f-mode result is stable under the admitted freedom.

    Authors: We agree that a concrete numerical bound would strengthen the discussion of the tidal-field ambiguity. In the revised version we will augment §4 with explicit calculations that vary the near-zone matching radius and boundary extensions, recomputing the overlap integrals and f-mode amplitudes for representative models. This will supply quantitative bounds showing that the variation in the f-mode contribution remains well below the 3% level of agreement with direct matching. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; f-mode robustness is validated against an independent direct-matching calculation

full rationale

The paper derives a relativistic mode-sum implementation in Regge-Wheeler gauge using near-zone boundary conditions to define interior tidal fields and overlap integrals. The central claim—that the dominant f-mode reproduces direct matching to ~3% across EOS—is presented as a numerical result from comparing two distinct methods, not as a quantity defined or fitted in terms of itself. The abstract explicitly flags the non-positive-definite inner-product operator and resulting lack of guaranteed convergence as a limitation ('the bad'), and notes the non-uniqueness of the interior tidal field ('the subtle') with limited impact. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The comparison to direct matching supplies external validation rather than circular reinforcement.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard general-relativity perturbation theory in a chosen gauge and on domain-specific boundary conditions whose justification is not fully detailed in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Regge-Wheeler gauge is appropriate for non-rotating neutron-star perturbations
    Standard choice for spherical background spacetimes in GR.
  • domain assumption Near-zone boundary conditions define the interior tidal field
    Invoked to set up the relativistic overlap integrals as described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5551 in / 1411 out tokens · 49962 ms · 2026-05-12T02:09:49.590435+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    What eigenfunction basis underlies the mode sum?

    work page

  2. [2]

    How do we define the tidal field inside the star?

    work page

  3. [3]

    What is the definition of the overlap integral in full general relativity? We already answered these questions theoretically and in harmonic gauge in a short Letter [33], which we summa- rize below:

    work page

  4. [4]

    This basis can accurately capture the QNM spectrum of compact stars up to thef-mode frequency [30, 38]

    The relevant basis is the set of stellar perturbation eigenfunctions that satisfy near-zone PN boundary conditions in the buffer zone, rather than quasi- normal boundary conditions at null infinity. This basis can accurately capture the QNM spectrum of compact stars up to thef-mode frequency [30, 38]

    work page

  5. [5]

    Any tidal field that satisfies the Hamiltonian and momentum constraint and matches smoothly to the external tidal field is a valid definition for the tidal field inside the star

    The tidal field inside the star is defined by separat- ing the metric perturbation inside the star arbitrar- ily into a self-field generated by the star and a tidal field. Any tidal field that satisfies the Hamiltonian and momentum constraint and matches smoothly to the external tidal field is a valid definition for the tidal field inside the star

    work page

  6. [6]

    homogeneous

    The definition of the overlap integral follows di- rectly from the operator equation that describes the evolution of the eigenfunctions. These answers, however, have not yet been backed up with concrete numerical results that implement the the- oretical ideas of [33] in practice. That is the purpose of this paper. In this paper, we implement the framework...

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors

    Eanna E. Flanagan and Tanja Hinderer, “Constrain- ing neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravita- tional wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    General Relativity and Gravitation , keywords =

    Katerina Chatziioannou, “Neutron-star tidal deformabil- ity and equation-of-state constraints,” General Relativity and Gravitation52(2020), 10.1007/s10714-020-02754-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02754-3 2020

  10. [10]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

    Tanja Hinderer, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,” Astrophys. J.677, 1216–1220 (2008), arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    Taylor Binnington and Eric Poisson, “Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084018 (2009), arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    Thibault Damour and Alessandro Nagar, “Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009), arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  13. [13]

    A General Variational Principle Gov- erning the Radial and the Non-Radial Oscillations of Gaseous Masses

    S. Chandrasekhar, “A General Variational Principle Gov- erning the Radial and the Non-Radial Oscillations of Gaseous Masses.” Astrophys. J.139, 664 (1964)

    work page 1964

  14. [14]

    On the stability of differentially rotating bodies,

    D. Lynden-Bell and J. P. Ostriker, “On the stability of differentially rotating bodies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society136, 293 (1967)

    work page 1967

  15. [15]

    Lagrangian perturba- tion theory of nonrelativistic fluids

    J. L. Friedman and B. F. Schutz, “Lagrangian perturba- tion theory of nonrelativistic fluids.” Astrophys. J.221, 937–957 (1978)

    work page 1978

  16. [16]

    On formation of close binaries by two-body tidal capture

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, “On formation of close binaries by two-body tidal capture.” Astrophys. J.213, 183–192 (1977)

    work page 1977

  17. [17]

    Nonlinear mode coupling in rotating stars and ther-mode instability in neutron stars,

    A. K. Schenk, P. Arras, É. É. Flanagan, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, “Nonlinear mode coupling in rotating stars and ther-mode instability in neutron stars,” Physi- cal Review D65(2001), 10.1103/physrevd.65.024001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.024001 2001

  18. [18]

    Nonlinear tides in close binary systems,

    Nevin N. Weinberg, Phil Arras, Eliot Quataert, and Josh Burkart, “Nonlinear tides in close binary systems,” The Astrophysical Journal751, 136 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Beyond the linear tide: impact of the non-linear tidal response of neutron stars on gravitational waveforms from binary inspirals,

    Hang Yu, Nevin N Weinberg, Phil Arras, James Kwon, and Tejaswi Venumadhav, “Beyond the linear tide: impact of the non-linear tidal response of neutron stars on gravitational waveforms from binary inspirals,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society519, 4325–4343 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Res- onance Locking of Anharmonicg-Modes in Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries,

    K. J. Kwon, Hang Yu, and Tejaswi Venumadhav, “Res- onance Locking of Anharmonicg-Modes in Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries,” (2024), arXiv:2410.03831 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Reso- nance locking: radian-level phase shifts due to nonlinear hydrodynamics ofg-modes in merging neutron star bina- ries,

    K. J. Kwon, Hang Yu, and Tejaswi Venumadhav, “Reso- nance locking: radian-level phase shifts due to nonlinear hydrodynamics ofg-modes in merging neutron star bina- ries,” (2025), arXiv:2503.11837 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Hinderer et al., Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one- body approach, Phys

    Tanja Hindereret al., “Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one- body approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 181101 (2016), arXiv:1602.00599 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian

    Jan Steinhoff, Tanja Hinderer, Alessandra Buonanno, and Andrea Taracchini, “Dynamical Tides in Gen- eral Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One- Body Hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016), arXiv:1608.01907 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Spin effects on neutron star fundamental-mode dynamical tides: Phenomenology and comparison to numerical simulations,

    Jan Steinhoff, Tanja Hinderer, Tim Dietrich, and Fran- cois Foucart, “Spin effects on neutron star fundamental- mode dynamical tides: Phenomenology and comparison to numerical simulations,” Physical Review Research3, 033129 (2021), arXiv:2103.06100 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides,

    Hang Yu and Shu Yan Lau, “Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides,” 22 Phys. Rev. D111, 084029 (2025), arXiv:2501.13064 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Modeling matter(s) in SEOBNRv5THM: Generating fast and accurate effective-one-body wave- forms for spin-aligned binary neutron stars,

    Marcus Haberland, Alessandra Buonanno, and Jan Steinhoff, “Modeling matter(s) in SEOBNRv5THM: Generating fast and accurate effective-one-body wave- forms for spin-aligned binary neutron stars,” arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2503.18934 (2025), arXiv:2503.18934 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high-mass-ratio binary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal effects,

    Adrian Abac, Tim Dietrich, Alessandra Buonanno, Jan Steinhoff, and Maximiliano Ujevic, “New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high-mass-ratio binary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal effects,” Phys- ical Review D109(2024), 10.1103/physrevd.109.024062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.024062 2024

  28. [28]

    New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spec- troscopy and dynamic tides,

    Sayan Chakrabarti, Térence Delsate, and Jan Steinhoff, “New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spec- troscopy and dynamic tides,” (2013), arXiv:1304.2228 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Investigating tidal heat- ing in neutron stars via gravitational Raman scattering,

    M. V. S. Saketh, Zihan Zhou, Suprovo Ghosh, Jan Stein- hoff, and Debarati Chatterjee, “Investigating tidal heat- ing in neutron stars via gravitational Raman scattering,” Phys. Rev. D110, 103001 (2024), arXiv:2407.08327 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Relativistic excitation of compact stars,

    Zhiqiang Miao, Xuefeng Feng, Zhen Pan, and Huan Yang, “Relativistic excitation of compact stars,” (2025), arXiv:2506.23176 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Poisson, Phys

    Eric Poisson, “Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post- Newtonian operational definition for tidally induced mul- tipole moments,” Phys. Rev. D103, 064023 (2021), arXiv:2012.10184 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    Luc Blanchet, “Gravitational Radiation from Post- Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries,” Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Bender and Steven A

    Carl M. Bender and Steven A. Orszag,Advanced Mathe- matical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I(Springer, 1999)

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    Pitre and E

    Tristan Pitre and Eric Poisson, “General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals, without modes,” (2023), 10.48550/arxiv.2311.04075, arXiv:2311.04075 [gr- qc]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.04075 2023

  35. [35]

    Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating rel- ativistic stars,

    Abhishek Hegade K. R., Justin L. Ripley, and Nicolás Yunes, “Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating rel- ativistic stars,” Phys. Rev. D109, 104064 (2024), arXiv:2403.03254 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Thetidalresponseofarelativistic star,

    Nils Andersson, Rhys Counsell, Fabian Gittins, and SuprovoGhosh,“Thetidalresponseofarelativistic star,” (2025), arXiv:2511.05139 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    First constraint on the dissipative tidal deformability of neutron stars,

    Justin L. Ripley, Abhishek Hegade K. R., Rohit S. Chan- dramouli, and Nicolas Yunes, “First constraint on the dissipative tidal deformability of neutron stars,” (2023), 10.48550/arxiv.2312.11659, arXiv:2312.11659 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11659 2023

  38. [38]

    Probing internal dissipative processes of neutron stars with gravitational waves during the inspiral of neu- tron star binaries,

    Justin L. Ripley, Abhishek Hegade K. R., and Nicolas Yunes, “Probing internal dissipative processes of neutron stars with gravitational waves during the inspiral of neu- tron star binaries,” (2023), 10.48550/arxiv.2306.15633, arXiv:2306.15633 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.15633 2023

  39. [39]

    Relativistic and Dy- namical Love,

    Abhishek Hegade K. R., K. J. Kwon, Tejaswi Venumad- hav, Hang Yu, and Nicolás Yunes, “Relativistic and Dy- namical Love,” (2025), arXiv:2507.10693 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Neutron Stars as Perfect Fluids: Extracting the Linearized Response Function,

    Irvin Martínez-Rodríguez, “Neutron Stars as Perfect Fluids: Extracting the Linearized Response Function,” (2026), arXiv:2602.07115 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspi- rals,

    Tristan Pitre and Eric Poisson, “Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspi- rals,” Phys.Rev.D112,084017(2025),arXiv:2506.08722 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Nonlinear rel- ativistic tidal response of neutron stars,

    Paolo Pani, Massimiliano Maria Riva, Luca Santoni, Nikola Savić, and Filippo Vernizzi, “Nonlinear rel- ativistic tidal response of neutron stars,” (2025), arXiv:2512.14663 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Universal Relations with Dynamical Tides,

    Jayana A. Saes, Abhishek Hegade K. R., and Nicolás Yunes, “Universal Relations with Dynamical Tides,” (2025), arXiv:2511.19626 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Relativistic stellar pulsations with near-zone boundary conditions,

    Lee Lindblom, Gregory Mendell, and James R. Ipser, “Relativistic stellar pulsations with near-zone boundary conditions,” Physical Review D56, 2118–2126 (1997)

    work page 1997

  45. [45]

    On the stability of relativistic systems

    J. L. Friedman and B. F. Schutz, “On the stability of relativistic systems.” Astrophys. J.200, 204–220 (1975)

    work page 1975

  46. [46]

    JohnL.FriedmanandNikolaosStergioulas,Rotating Rel- ativistic Stars(2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    A Variational Principle and a Stability Criterion for the Non-Radial Modes of Pulsation of Stellar Models in General Relativ- ity,

    Steven L. Detweiler and James R. Ipser, “A Variational Principle and a Stability Criterion for the Non-Radial Modes of Pulsation of Stellar Models in General Relativ- ity,” Astrophys. J.185, 685–708 (1973)

    work page 1973

  48. [48]

    Perturbation theory for post-newtonian neutron stars,

    Fabian Gittins, Nils Andersson, and Shanshan Yin, “Perturbation theory for post-newtonian neutron stars,” (2025), arXiv:2503.03345 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Regular eigenvalue problems with eigen- value parameter in the boundary condition,

    Johann Walter, “Regular eigenvalue problems with eigen- value parameter in the boundary condition,” Mathema- tische Zeitschrift133, 301–312 (1973)

    work page 1973

  50. [50]

    Two-point boundary value problems with eigenvalue parameter in the boundary conditions,

    C. T. Fulton, “Two-point boundary value problems with eigenvalue parameter in the boundary conditions,” Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section A: Mathematics77A, 293–308 (1977)

    work page 1977

  51. [51]

    The quadrupole oscil- lations of neutron stars

    L. Lindblom and S. L. Detweiler, “The quadrupole oscil- lations of neutron stars.” ApJ53, 73–92 (1983)

    work page 1983

  52. [52]

    On the nonradial pulsa- tions of general relativistic stellar models,

    S. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, “On the nonradial pulsa- tions of general relativistic stellar models,” Astrophys. J. 292, 12–15 (1985)

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    Gravitational perturba- tions of the schwarzschild spacetime: A practical covari- ant and gauge-invariant formalism,

    Karl Martel and Eric Poisson, “Gravitational perturba- tions of the schwarzschild spacetime: A practical covari- ant and gauge-invariant formalism,” Physical Review D 71(2005), 10.1103/physrevd.71.104003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.104003 2005

  54. [54]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,

    Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Andrei O Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 163001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Generic instability of rotating rela- tivistic stars,

    John L. Friedman, “Generic instability of rotating rela- tivistic stars,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 62, 247–278 (1978)

    work page 1978

  56. [56]

    The Stability of Gaseous Masses for Radial and Non-Radial Oscillations in the Post- Newtonian Approximation of General Relativity

    S. Chandrasekhar, “The Stability of Gaseous Masses for Radial and Non-Radial Oscillations in the Post- Newtonian Approximation of General Relativity.” Astro- phys. J.142, 1519 (1965)

    work page 1965

  57. [57]

    Impact of the equation of state on <mml:math xmlns:mml=

    Athul Kunjipurayil, Tianqi Zhao, Bharat Ku- mar, Bijay K. Agrawal, and Madappa Prakash, “Impact of the equation of state on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> -and<mml:mathxmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/math/mathml" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math> -...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.063005 1998

  58. [58]

    W-modes - A new family of normal modes of pulsating relativistic stars,

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, “W-modes - A new family of normal modes of pulsating relativistic stars,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society255, 119–128 (1992)

    work page 1992

  59. [59]

    Nonradial oscillations of 23 stratified neutron stars with solid crusts: Mode char- acterization and tidal resonances in coalescing bina- ries,

    Yong Gao, Hao-Jui Kuan, Cheng-Jun Xia, Hector O. Silva, and Masaru Shibata, “Nonradial oscillations of 23 stratified neutron stars with solid crusts: Mode char- acterization and tidal resonances in coalescing bina- ries,” Phys. Rev. D112, 123006 (2025), arXiv:2509.00257 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Cosmological baryon and lepto n number in the presence of electroweak fermion number violation,

    Jocelyn S. Read, Benjamin D. Lackey, Benjamin J. Owen, and John L. Friedman, “Constraints on a phe- nomenologically parametrized neutron-star equation of state,” Physical Review D79(2009), 10.1103/phys- revd.79.124032

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2009